Significance of malperfusion syndromes prior to contemporary surgical repair for acute type A dissection: outcomes and need for additional revascularizations

Outcomes following repair of acute type A aortic dissection in patients with cerebral malperfusion

OBJECTIVES

Patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) presenting with cerebral malperfusion have significantly poorer postoperative outcomes, making the decision whether to perform acute surgery difficult. The aim of this study was to investigate types of neurological symptoms and radiological findings and their association with permanent neurological injury and mortality following ATAAD repair.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. A total of 629 patients underwent ATAAD surgery between January 1998 and December 2023 at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Of these, 93 (14.7%) presented with cerebral malperfusion and constituted the study population. The primary endpoints were clinical neurological injury and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day mortality was 25.0%. Fifty-two patients (57.1%) had persisting neurological deficit. Patients with postoperative neurological deficit had significantly higher 30-day mortality than patients without postoperative neurological deficit (37.3% vs 5.1%, p > 0.001). Common carotid artery dissection and carotid artery occlusion were significantly more frequent in patients who developed postoperative neurological injury. Preoperative hemiparesis/hemiplegia was associated with a significant increase of persisting neurological deficits, and unconsciousness was associated with a significant increase in 30-day mortality or persisting neurological deficits. After repair, 52.2% of patients showed an improvement in their clinical neurological status.

CONCLUSION

In ATAAD patients who present with cerebral malperfusion, the risk of permanent neurological deficit and 30-day mortality is high, but a significant proportion of patients survive and more than half demonstrate an improved neurological state postoperatively.

Intraoperative assessment and treatment of residual distal malperfusion improves outcomes in patients with acute Debakey I dissection

OBJECTIVES

Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) with malperfusion carries high mortality and morbidity despite current surgical techniques; new approaches are needed to improve outcomes. This study evaluates the outcomes of patients undergoing intraoperative assessment and treatment of distal malperfusion during central aortic repair.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 551 TAAD patients from 2000 to 2023 identified 54 patients with clinical malperfusion of the mesenteric, renal, spinal cord or iliofemoral based on clinical presentation, imaging and biomarkers. Patients with radiological aortic branch involvement but without clinical symptoms were excluded. Patients were grouped into: standard approach (n = 36), where central aortic repair was followed by postoperative ICU care, and comprehensive approach (n = 18), where intraoperative evaluation for persistent malperfusion was conducted after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass, with immediate intervention if needed. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Secondary outcomes included resolution of malperfusion.

RESULTS

Of 54 patients, 41% (n = 22) had mesenteric, 46% (n = 25) renal, 11% (n = 6) spinal and 76% (n = 41) iliofemoral malperfusion. The comprehensive approach was significantly associated with reduced odds of the composite outcome [odds ratio (OR): 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04-0.63, P = 0.008] and increased odds of resolving malperfusion (OR: 4.55, 95% CI: 1.26-16.44, P = 0.021). In the mesenteric subgroup (n = 22), odds of malperfusion resolution were markedly higher (OR: 19.30, 95% CI: 2.17-171.65, P = 0.008). However, no significant associations were found in the limb (OR: 3.17, P = 0.107) or renal subgroups (OR: 4.38, P = 0.164).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TAAD undergoing immediate intraoperative evaluation to identify and treat distal malperfusion simultaneously with central aortic repair may benefit from lower rates of complications and bowel resection. Further studies with larger datasets are needed to validate this approach.

Performance of the open-first repair strategy in type A aortic dissection with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome eligible for delayed repair

OBJECTIVE

For patients with type A aortic dissection complicated by mesenteric malperfusion syndrome, some centers advocate a nontraditional approach based on up-front endovascular intervention and delayed open repair. However, the efficacy of this strategy cannot be understood without first understanding outcomes of the traditional open-first strategy in the same select patient population eligible for delayed repair, applying modern techniques of hybrid aortic surgery.

METHODS

Patients with acute type A aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion syndrome were queried from a single institution. Those presenting with aortic rupture, tamponade, or cardiogenic shock (ineligible for delayed repair) were excluded. Patients were managed with immediate open aortic repair. Short-term and long-term outcomes are reported.

RESULTS

A total of 1228 patients were treated for acute type A dissection in the study period, of whom 77 were included in the mesenteric malperfusion syndrome cohort. In-hospital mortality was 29% compared with 39% in an identically selected mesenteric malperfusion syndrome population undergoing delayed repair reported previously. Among patients with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome, 32% underwent additional procedures addressing distal malperfusion in a hybrid operating room during or after open repair. Concomitant proximal malperfusion (coronary, cerebral, or upper extremity) was common in the mesenteric malperfusion syndrome cohort, present in 35% of cases. Although early mortality was greater in the mesenteric malperfusion syndrome cohort compared with all acute type A dissections, 10-year survival among those discharged alive was similar (65% vs 59%, P = .18).

CONCLUSIONS

The traditional open-first repair strategy performs equal to or better than the delayed repair strategy for patients with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome eligible for delayed repair.

Transfusion and coagulation management in acute type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

In acute type A dissection, the coagulation system is impaired by the dissection and its complications as well as the use of the heart-lung machine with hypothermia. Because of the critical importance of effective haemostasis at the end of the operation, the use of coagulation products and blood transfusions is usually unavoidable.

AIM

This retrospective study aims to analyse the use of blood products and coagulation factors in the context of acute aortic dissections, and the factors influencing their use.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2022, 369 patients were operated on for acute type A dissection. Clinical details, including the status at presentation and perioperatively administered transfusions and coagulation factors were obtained, and patients were stratified according to the Penn classification. A multivariable linear regression analysis for transfusions and coagulation factors was conducted, including typical risk factors.

RESULTS

The use of perioperatively required transfusions and coagulation factor (prothrombin complex concentrate and fibrinogen) substitution increased significantly with a higher ischaemic burden, including both localized and generalized malperfusion (Penn A

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical repair for acute type A dissection remains major surgery, requiring transfusions and coagulation factors in almost all patients. The ischaemic burden was identified as the most important factor that necessitates the use of these products, and was associated with early death. With proper management, acceptable rethoracotomy and chest drain rates with good clinical outcomes can be achieved.

Collapse

Key Words

• Aortic dissection
• Aortic surgery
• Coagulation factors
• Transfusions

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Aortic Dissection/surgery
• Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging
• Aortic Dissection/blood
• Aortic Dissection/mortality
• Retrospective Studies
• Male
• Female
• Middle Aged
• Risk Factors
• Treatment Outcome
• Blood Transfusion/mortality
• Aortic Aneurysm/surgery
• Aortic Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging
• Aortic Aneurysm/blood
• Aortic Aneurysm/mortality
• Blood Coagulation/drug effects
• Aged
• Acute Disease
• Blood Coagulation Factors/adverse effects
• Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use
• Blood Coagulation Factors/administration & dosage
• Time Factors
• Coagulants/adverse effects
• Coagulants/therapeutic use
• Coagulants/administration & dosage
• Risk Assessment
• Adult
• Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Philipp Pfeiffer Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Vanessa Buchholz Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Chris Probst Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Ahmed Ghazy Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
René Rissel Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Jan Griesinger Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Hendrik Treede Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Daniel-Sebastian Dohle Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

MR Angiography for Aortic Diseases

Aortic pathologic conditions represent diverse disorders, including aortic aneurysm, acute aortic syndrome, traumatic aortic injury, and atherosclerosis. Given the nonspecific clinical features, noninvasive imaging is critical in screening, diagnosis, management, and posttherapeutic surveillance. Of the commonly used imaging modalities, including ultrasound, computed tomography, and MR imaging, the final choice often depends on a combination of factors: acuity of clinical presentation, suspected underlying diagnosis, and institutional practice. Further research is needed to identify the potential clinical role and define appropriate use criteria for advanced MR applications such as four-dimenional flow to manage patients with aortic pathologic conditions.

Malperfusion in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Nationwide Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study describes in detail the clinical burden of malperfusion associated with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) in a large, national cohort and the effect of treatment strategy on outcomes.

METHODS

All patients undergoing repair of ATAAD between 2017 and 2020 in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database were studied. Malperfusion was defined using STS definitions on the basis of imaging or the surgeon's evaluation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of patient and treatment factors on outcomes in patients with and without malperfusion.

RESULTS

A total of 9958 patients undergoing ATAAD repair were studied. Preoperative malperfusion occurred in 27.7% (2748 of 9958) of cases and most often involved the extremity (14.9%; 1484 of 9958), renal (10.2%), or cerebral (9.8%) vascular beds. Operative mortality was much greater among patients with malperfusion (26.8% vs 13.6%; P < .001). After adjustment, coronary malperfusion was associated with the highest odds of mortality (odds ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.85-2.81; P < .001) followed by mesenteric malperfusion (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.45-2.28; P < .001). Cerebral malperfusion was not independently associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.94-1.38; P = .18). Partial arch replacement (zone 1 or zone 2) compared with ascending aorta or hemiarch replacement only showed a similar rate of mortality in patients with malperfusion (24.8% vs 26.9%; P = .99) and without malperfusion (11.6% vs 13.6%; P = .54).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative malperfusion in ATAAD was common and associated with significant operative mortality, which varied according to the malperfused region. Partial aortic arch replacement, compared with ascending aorta or hemiarch replacement alone, was not associated with increased mortality.

Anesthetic Considerations for Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta

Thoracic aorta pathologies, especially those of the ascending aorta and aortic arch, were traditionally approached via open surgical repair. This carries risk of ischemic end-organ damage and other complications. Endovascular repair of ascending aorta and aortic arch pathologies is becoming more successful and widespread, thereby posing numerous challenges to the anesthesiologist. This article reviews the anesthesia-pertinent pathophysiology, repair techniques, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative management, and postoperative care of patients presenting for endovascular repair of thoracic aorta pathologies.

Optimized strategy to improve the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection with malperfusion syndrome

BACKGROUND

The mortality of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with malperfusion syndrome (MPS) is high. However, the management strategy remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the strategy for MPS at our institution.

METHODS

Among 724 patients with ATAAD, 167 patients with MPS were treated with immediate central repair (first stage) or an optimized strategy (second stage). In the second stage, the optimized strategy used was based on 6-hour threshold from symptom onset. For MPS with symptom onset within 6 hours, immediate central repair was performed, followed by endovascular reperfusion if malperfusion persisted. With symptom onset beyond 6 hours, individualized delayed central repair was performed. We compared outcomes between the first and second stages.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality of ATAAD was significantly decreased when the optimized strategy was used (4.3% in the second stage vs 12.5% in the first stage; P < .01). In the second stage, the in-hospital mortality for MPS was decreased (10.2% vs 33.9%; P < .01). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality for MPS with symptom onset within 6 hours and beyond 6 hours decreased from 24% to 7.5% and from 41.2% to 11.8%, respectively. The operative mortality of MPS in the second stage was comparable to that in patients without MPS (4.0% vs 2.4%; P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimized strategy significantly improved the outcomes of MPS. The 6-hour threshold from symptom onset could be very useful in determining the timing of central repair. For patients with MPS symptom onset within 6 hours, immediate central repair is reasonable; for those with symptom onset beyond 6 hours, individualized delayed central repair should be considered.

Case Report: Surgery combined with extracorporeal membraneoxygenation for acute type A aortic dissection complicated with acute myocardial infarction

Background

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most serious complications of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and markedly increases patient mortality. Simultaneous treatment strategies remain controversial. How to improve the treatment of these patients remains a critical challenge for cardiovascular surgeons.

Case presentation

All three patients who experienced chest pain were admitted to emergency department of our hospital. The 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed ST-segment depression, myocardial enzyme levels were significantly elevated. Emergency physicians diagnosed ATAAD with AMI, and emergency surgery was planned in collaboration with the cardiovascular surgery team. One-stage surgery for coronary revascularization and central aortic repair were performed, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was implanted, ECMO was discontinued when hemodynamics stabilized. The patient ultimately recovered well and was discharged.

Conclusion

For ATAAD combined with right ventricular AMI, one-stage surgery for coronary revascularization and central aortic repair, supported by ECMO as bridge, can be life-saving treatment strategy, the prognosis for all three patients was excellent.

Impact of direct mesenteric perfusion on malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection repair

OBJECTIVES

Mesenteric malperfusion in acute aortic dissection remains a life-threatening complication with no standardized treatment strategy. This study aimed to describe and evaluate the outcomes of our integrated approach combining exploratory laparotomy, immediate mesenteric reperfusion, and central aortic repair.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with acute aortic dissection with a preoperative diagnosis of mesenteric malperfusion who were treated between August 2011 and November 2022. Our surgical approach was to establish cardiopulmonary bypass, followed by exploratory laparotomy with mesenteric artery flow assessment using Doppler ultrasound and direct perfusion if needed, central aortic repair, and subsequent mesenteric artery reconstruction. The primary end-point was the 30-day operative mortality.

RESULTS

Among 217 patients with acute aortic dissection, 12 (5.5%) had mesenteric malperfusion on preoperative computed tomography. Ten patients underwent exploratory laparotomy, where Doppler ultrasonography revealed reduced mesenteric blood flow in five patients (2.3% of the total 217 patients). These patients underwent direct perfusion of the mesenteric artery via a side branch of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. Doppler ultrasound confirmed the restoration of mesenteric blood flow in all perfused patients. No bowel resections were required. The operative mortality in patients with mesenteric malperfusion was 20%. The causes of death were stroke (n = 1) and acute myocardial infarction (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Our integrated surgical strategy combining central aortic repair with concurrent exploratory laparotomy and immediate mesenteric perfusion demonstrated technical feasibility in managing mesenteric malperfusion during aortic repair. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted to validate these findings.

Malperfusion, Malperfusion Syndrome, and Mesenteric Ischemia in Aortic Dissection

Aortic malperfusion occurs in a significant percentage of patients with acute aortic dissection, and causes malperfusion syndrome, the clinical entity defined by end organ ischemia, in 10-33% of patients. Malperfusion syndrome can be rapidly lethal and can involve the coronary, cerebral, visceral, or lower extremity vessels. Depending on presentation, it may be appropriately and well treated with endovascular fenestration prior to definitive central aortic repair.

What Is the Efficacy of Bilateral Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion in Cerebral Protection?

Background/Objectives: Acute type A aortic dissection is among the many types of catastrophic cardiovascular emergencies. The development of serious morbidity, especially neurological complications after the operation, remains a huge threat. We aimed to present comparatively the results of using unilateral or bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion to minimize these threats and to demonstrate the postoperative effects of antegrade cerebral perfusion choices. Methods: The 147 patients who underwent emergency acute type A aortic dissection surgery between January 2018 and January 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (Group 1) (n = 89) and those who underwent bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (Group 2) (n = 59). Baseline demographics, and preoperative, operative, and postoperative data of patients were compared statistically. Results: When the analyses of baseline demographics, and preoperative and operative data were evaluated, no significant difference was found between the groups. In addition, when comparing postoperative results, no statistical difference was found between the groups except for new-onset permanent neurological complications. The rate of postoperative new-onset permanent neurological complications was found to be 17.9% in group 1, where unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion was applied, and 5.1% in group 2, where bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion was applied, and this comparison was statistically significant. Conclusions: The competence of the Willis Polygon should not be relied upon without any evidence, and we believe that bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion can be performed with a technique that does not compromise surgical comfort.

Aortic arch registry of type a aortic dissection (AoArch) - rationale, design and definition criteria

BACKGROUND

Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) is a deadly condition that demands immediate surgery, because it involves a critically. The mortality and morbidity associated with it are significant, and it is vital that the patient's conditions and treatment strategies are fully understood to ensure the appropriate management of TAAAD. This study aims to ascertain whether hemiarch repair (HAR) versus extended arch repair (EAR) with or without descending aortic intervention results in better perioperative and late outcomes for patients with TAAAD.

METHODS

Four leading centers of cardiac surgery from two European countries have joined forces to create a groundbreaking multicenter observational registry (AoArch). This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB 202201173). We conducted a retrospective review (NCT00591263) of our prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent operative repair of DeBakey type I or type II dissection from January 1, 2005 to March 2024 (NCT05927090). We will analyze how patient co-morbidities, referral conditions, and surgical strategies involving hemi-arch repair (HAR) and extended arch repair (EAR) impact early and late adverse events. We have developed a procedure urgency algorithm based on the severity of preoperative hemodynamic conditions and malperfusion due to TAAAD, and we will use it to assess the primary clinical outcomes: in-hospital mortality, late mortality, and reoperations on the aorta. We will define secondary outcomes as permanent neurologic deficit, the need for new dialysis, respiratory failure, a composite of major adverse events (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, the need for dialysis, or the need for tracheostomy), and a composite of major adverse pulmonary events (intubation over 48 h, pneumonia, reintubation, tracheostomy), and reoperation due to bleeding.

DISCUSSION

This multicenter registry will definitively determine the prognostic significance of critical preoperative conditions and the efficacy of extended arch interventions and hemiarch repair in reducing the risk of early adverse events after surgery for TAAAD. This registry will provide insights into the long-term durability of different strategies of surgical repair for TAAAD.

A novel hybrid prosthesis for open repair of acute DeBakey type I dissection with malperfusion: Early results from the PERSEVERE trial

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after hemiarch repair for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection (ADTI) remain unfavorable, with high rates of major adverse events and negative aortic remodeling. The PERSEVERE study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the AMDS Hybrid prosthesis, a novel bare metal stent, in patients presenting with preoperative malperfusion.

METHODS

PERSEVERE is a prospective single-arm investigational study conducted at 26 sites in the United States. Ninety-three patients underwent ADTI aortic dissection repair with AMDS implantation. The 30-day primary endpoints are a composite rate of 4 major adverse events and the rate of distal anastomotic new entry tears. The secondary endpoints include aortic remodeling.

RESULTS

Clinical malperfusion was documented in 76 patients (82%); only radiographic malperfusion, in 17 (18%). The median follow-up in the 93 patients was 5.6 months. Within 30 days, 9 patients died (9.7%), 10 patients (10.8%) experienced new disabling stroke, and 18 patients (19.4%) had new-onset renal failure requiring ≥1 dialysis treatment. There were no cases of myocardial infarction. The composite rate of major adverse events (27%) was lower than that reported in the reference cohort (58%). There were no distal anastomotic new entry tears. Technical success was achieved in 99% of patients. Early remodeling indicated total aortic diameter stability, true lumen expansion, and false lumen reduction in the treated aortic segment.

CONCLUSIONS

Early results show significant reductions in major adverse events and distal anastomotic new entry tears, successfully meeting both primary endpoints. The technical success rate was high. AMDS can be used safely in patients with ADTI dissection with malperfusion.

Machine learning in risk prediction of continuous renal replacement therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop machine learning models for risk prediction of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

METHODS

We extracted CABG patients from the electronic medical record system of the hospital. The endpoint of this study was the requirement for CRRT after CABG surgery. The Boruta method was used for feature selection. Seven machine learning algorithms were developed to train models and validated using 10 fold cross-validation (CV). Model discrimination and calibration were estimated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plot, respectively. We used the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to illustrate the effects of the features attributed to the model and analyze the effects of individual features on the output of the mode.

RESULTS

In this study, 72 (37.89%) patients underwent CRRT, with a higher mortality compared to those patients without CRRT. The Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB) model with the highest AUC were considered as the final predictive model and performed best in predicting postoperative CRRT. The analysis of importance revealed that cardiac troponin T, creatine kinase isoenzyme, albumin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, NYHA, serum creatinine, and age were the top seven features of the GNB model. The SHAP force analysis illustrated how created model visualized individualized prediction of CRRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning models were developed to predict CRRT. This contributes to the identification of risk variables for CRRT following CABG surgery in ICU patients and enables the optimization of perioperative managements for patients.

Incidence Rates of Penn Classes and Class-Specific Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Patients: An Epidemiologic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening emergency that is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. One of the complications is end-organ ischemia, a known predictor of mortality. The primary aims of this meta-analysis were to summarize the findings of observational studies investigating the utility of the Penn classification system and to analyze the incidence rates and mortality patterns within each class. The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched through to April 2023. These were filtered by multiple reviewers to give 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The extracted data included patient characteristics, and primary outcomes were the incidence rates of different Penn classes, along with the corresponding mortality for each class. Out of 1,512 studies identified during the initial search, 10 studies, including 4,494 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence of Penn A was highest at 0.55 (95% CI 0.52, 0.58), followed by Penn B at 0.21 (95% CI 0.17, 0.25), and finally Penn C at 0.14 (95% CI 0.11, 0.17). Patients with Penn BC were found to be at the highest risk of death, as their early mortality rates were 0.36 (95% CI 0.31, 0.41). Within those populations, the subtype with the highest individual mortality was Penn C at 0.21 (95% CI 0.15, 0.27), followed by Penn B at 0.19 (95% CI 0.15, 0.23) and Penn A at 0.07 (95% CI 0.05, 0.10). Among patients presenting with ATAAD, class A was most frequently observed, followed by classes B, C, and BC. These findings indicate an incremental increase in mortality rates with the progression of Penn classification.

Treatment Strategies for Acute Aortic Dissection With Malperfusion: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection with malperfusion necessitates emergency surgery and is associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed patients' treatment courses from the initial management to hospital discharge in cases of acute aortic dissection (AAD) with malperfusion and investigated the risk factors associated with mortality.

METHODS

We evaluated cases of AAD with malperfusion treated at our institution over a 16-year period from 2007 to 2022. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. The study's primary outcome measure was mortality during hospitalization. We collected and analyzed data encompassing preoperative patient characteristics, Stanford classification, sites of preoperative malperfusion, surgical techniques employed, and postoperative complications. These variables were examined to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

During the study period, 366 patients were admitted with AAD, 102 of whom had malperfusion. There were 62 men (61%) and 40 women (39%), with a mean age of 64 ± 13 years (range: 28-87 years). According to the Stanford classification, 75 (74%) and 27 (26%) patients had type A and B aortic dissection, respectively, and 29 patients (28%) presented with shock. Preoperative malperfusion sites included the brain, coronary arteries, abdominal viscera, limbs, and spinal cord in 40 (39%), 10 (10%), 34 (33%), 52 (51%), and six (6%) patients, respectively. Eleven (11%) patients required immediate intervention in the emergency department. The treatments administered to the patients were as follows: ascending aortic replacement, 30 (29%) patients; aortic arch replacement, 34 (33%) patients; root replacement, three (3%) patients; thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), 12 (12%) patients; non-anatomic bypass, five (5%) patients; and conservative management, five (5%) patients. In-hospital mortality occurred in 23 (23%) patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified preoperative coronary malperfusion as an independent risk factor of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative coronary malperfusion is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients with AAD presenting with malperfusion.

Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Aortic Dissection with Malperfusion Syndrome

Purpose

There is limited data on the midterm results of endovascular treatment for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with malperfusion syndrome (MS), particularly in Asia. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute TBAD with MS.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for acute TBAD with MS.

Results

Among the 27 patients with TBAD and MS, malperfusion was observed in the isolated renal (44.4%), visceral (7.4%) and iliofemoral (25.9%) arteries, as well as their combinations (22.2%). The patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) only (25.9%), selective stenting only in arteries affected by malperfusion (22.2%), or combined treatment with TEVAR and selective stenting (51.9%). Primary technical success was achieved in all the patients. No inhospital mortality or early death within 30 days after operation occurred. The rates of stroke, limb ischemia, acute kidney injury, and reintervention at 30 days were 7.4%, 3.7%, 25.9%, and 3.7%, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 4.3±3.1 years. During the follow-up, the rates of death, stroke, maintenance hemodialysis, aneurysmal change, and reintervention were 0%, 3.7%, 7.4%, 7.4%, and 7.4%, respectively. Two patients required reintervention due to limb ischemia and aneurysmal changes in the distal portion of the stent graft. Computed tomography scans revealed a significant increase in aortic diameters in patients who underwent selective stenting compared to those who underwent TEVAR over a 3-year period, with changes in aortic area measuring 878.9 mm2 vs. 188.4 mm2 at the middle of the lesion (P=0.037), 303.7 mm2 vs. 22.8 mm2 at the level of the celiac trunk (P=0.025), and 442.9 mm2 vs. 37.3 mm2 at the level of the renal artery (P=0.019).

Conclusion

The endovascular treatment of acute TBAD with MS demonstrated a high primary technical success rate and promising short- and midterm clinical outcomes.

Endovascular Recanalization and Carotid Stenting: The New Approach to Restore Cerebral Perfusion during Aortic Dissection

A type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a dangerous condition requiring emergency surgery. Due to the similarity of the symptoms of cerebral malperfusion in TAAD and the signs of ischemic stroke, a differential diagnosis of these diseases is not always available. Patients with TAAD after cerebral malperfusion can have a neurological deficit. Thrombolysis is performed in this case. It can worsen the patient's condition and increase the risk of mortality and disability. The aim of the study is to evaluate the new approach to restoring cerebral perfusion during aortic dissection. This approach includes endovascular recanalization and carotid stenting.

METHODS

Two clinical cases of TAAD complicated by cerebral malperfusion are described. The first patient is 73 years old and was admitted as planned to perform transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for grade III aortic stenosis. The patient underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on the second day after admission. The second patient is 60 years old and was hospitalized by an ambulance with strong hypertension and ischemia. The surgical correction of aortic dissection was postponed until the neurological status assessment in both patients.

RESULTS

The surgery to correct the aorta dissection was deemed inappropriate. The carotid arteries have been reanalyzed, and cerebral perfusion has been restored in a short time in both patients.

CONCLUSION

Acute bilateral internal carotid occlusion is a potentially fatal TAAD outcome. Emergency endovascular recanalization and carotid stenting may be considered one of the few ways to restore cerebral perfusion.

Three-year outcomes of the Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation trial

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent in a prospective, nonrandomized, international study (Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation) of patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection.

METHODS

The Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent was used in combination with the standard surgical management of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection I to treat patients with (56.5%, 26/46) and without (43.5%, 20/46) preoperative clinical and radiographic malperfusion. All patients had a primary entry tear in the ascending aorta, and 97.8% (45/46) were treated with a hemiarch repair. Median follow-up was 3 years.

RESULTS

All 47 patients underwent emergency surgical repair with successful Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent implantation. One patient was excluded from analysis due to use in iatrogenic dissection. Overall mortality at 30 days and 3 years was 13.0% (6/46) and 21.7% (10/46), respectively. Overall new stroke rate at 30 days was 15.2% (7/46). No devices were explanted at any time during the 3-year median follow-up. At 3 years, the total aortic diameter in zones 0, 1, and 2 decreased or remained stable in 91.7%, 72.7%, and 75.0%, respectively. The false lumen was completely or partially thrombosed in 90.5% in zone 0, 60.0% in zone 1, and 68.2% in zone 2 at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent in the treatment of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection I holds promise as a simple technology that enables repair of the aortic arch and proximal descending aorta, while promoting positive aortic remodeling. Ongoing follow-up of the Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation trial will provide long-term, prospective, clinical outcomes and radiographic data on positive remodeling of the aortic arch.

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stenting of the Celiac Artery for Hepatic Hypoperfusion After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Case Report

Type A aortic dissection is a life-threatening emergency requiring prompt surgical treatment. The dissection itself and use of cardiopulmonary bypass can lead to further postoperative complications, including aortic branch occlusion, thrombosis, ischemia, and fatal end-organ damage. Celiac artery occlusion with consequent hepatic malperfusion is one feared complication of aortic dissection, which requires urgent surgical intervention. Optimal management of celiac artery dissection in the setting of type A aortic dissection has not yet been described in the literature. In this report, we describe a 39-year-old female patient with hypertension who was found to have celiac artery dissection and impending hepatic failure less than 48 hours after emergent ascending aortic replacement for type A aortic dissection. Placement of an ultrasound-guided endovascular celiac artery stent enabled reperfusion of the liver, ultimately saving the patient's life.

A visceral organ function-focused therapeutic strategy using a 6-hour time window for patients with acute type a aortic dissection complicated by mesenteric malperfusion

BACKGROUND

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) complicated by mesenteric malperfusion is a critical and complicated condition. The optimal treatment strategy remains controversial, debate exists as to whether aortic dissection or mesenteric malperfusion should be addressed first, and the exact time window for mesenteric ischemia intervention is still unclear. To solve this problem, we developed a new concept based on the pathophysiological mechanism of mesenteric ischemia, using a 6-hour time window to divide newly admitted patients by the time from onset to admission, applying different treatment protocols to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with ATAAD complicated by mesenteric malperfusion.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that covered a five-year period. From July 2018 to December 2020(phase I), all patients underwent emergency open surgery. From January 2021 to June 2023(phase II), patients with an onset within 6 h all underwent open surgical repair, followed by immediately postoperative examination if the malperfusion is suspected, while the restoration of mesenteric perfusion and visceral organ function was performed first, followed by open repair, in patients with an onset beyond 6 h.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline and surgical data. In phase I, eleven patients with mesenteric malperfusion underwent open surgery, while in phase II, our novel strategy was applied, with sixteen patients with an onset greater than 6 h and eleven patients with an onset less than 6 h. During the waiting period, none died of aortic rupture, but four patients died of organ failure, twelve patients had organ function improvement and underwent surgery successfully survived. The overall mortality rate decreased with the use of this novel strategy (54.55% vs. 18.52%, p = 0.047). Furthermore, the surgical mortality rate between the two periods showed even stronger statistical significance (54.55% vs. 4.35%, p = 0.022). Moreover, the proportions of patients with sepsis and multiorgan failure also showed differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel strategy for patients with ATAAD complicated by mesenteric malperfusion not only improves the surgical success rate but also reduces the overall mortality rate.

Analysis of current mortality risk scores for acute type A aortic dissection: The Siena experience

OBJECTIVE

In literature, various risk scores have been described to predict in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing surgery for acute type A dissection. We want to evaluate which factors are most correlated with a negative outcome and testing the validity of the current scores in literature analyzing our experience of over 20 years in the surgery of type A aortic dissections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 324 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to 30-day survival or mortality. The preoperative variables analyzed are the parameters necessary for the calculation of scores: Penn Classification, Leipzig Halifax and adjusted Leipzig Halifax score, GERAADA score and EuroSCORE II. Intra- and post-operative mortality were 10.2% and 17.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the preoperative predictors of 30-day mortality were age greater than 70 years, low eject fraction levels, visceral and coronary malperfusion. Both GERAADA and EuroSCORE II were statistically significant predictors of 30-day mortality. However, EuroSCORE II underestimates the mortality compared to GERAADA score probably due to the lack of evaluation of fundamental preoperative factors in the course of type A aortic dissection.

RESULTS

The study has demonstrated the efficacy of the GERAADA score in predicting the outcome of patients undergoing surgery and the underestimation of the mortality of EuroSCORE II in our population.

Outcomes of emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection complicated by malperfusion syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to determine the impact of malperfusion syndrome on in-hospital mortality and midterm survival after emergency aortic arch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

This was an observational study of aortic surgeries from 2010 to 2018. All patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing open aortic arch reconstruction were included. Patients were dichotomized by the presence or absence of malperfusion syndrome and were analyzed for differences in short-term postoperative outcomes, including morbidity and in-hospital mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox analysis were performed to identify variables associated with survival.

RESULTS

A total of 467 patients undergoing aortic arch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection were identified, of whom 332 (71.1%) presented without malperfusion syndrome and 135 (28.9%) presented with malperfusion syndrome. Patients with malperfusion syndrome had higher in-hospital mortality (21.5% vs 5.7%) than patients without malperfusion syndrome. After multivariable adjustment, malperfusion syndrome was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio, 2.43, 95% confidence interval, 1.61-3.66, P < .001) compared with patients without malperfusion syndrome. The predicted risk of mortality increased as the number of malperfused vascular beds increased. Patients with coronary malperfusion syndrome and neuro-malperfusion syndrome had reduced survival compared with the rest of the cohort (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Malperfusion syndrome is associated with higher in-hospital mortality and reduced survival for patients with acute type A aortic dissection, with the risk of mortality increasing as the number of malperfused vascular beds increases. Coronary malperfusion syndrome and neuro-malperfusion syndrome may represent a high-risk subgroup of patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection complicated by malperfusion syndrome. Finally, malperfusion syndrome may benefit from immediate surgical intervention to restore true lumen perfusion, as opposed to operative delay.

Analysis of factors affecting outcome in acute type A aortic dissection complicated by preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation

OBJECTIVES

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) aggravates the pre-existing dismal prognosis of patients suffering from acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We aimed to identify factors affecting survival and outcome in ATAAD patients requiring CPR at presentation at 2 European aortic centres.

METHODS

Data on 112 surgical candidates and undergoing preoperative CPR were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to 30-day mortality. A multivariable model identified predictors for 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Preoperative death occurred in 23 patients (20.5%). In the remaining 89 surgical patients (79.5%) circulatory arrest time (41 ± 20 min in 30-day non-survivors vs 30 ± 13 min in 30-day survivor, P = 0.003) as well as cardiopulmonary bypass time (320 ± 132 min in 30-day non-survivors vs 252 ± 140 min in 30-day survivor, P = 0.020) time was significantly longer in patients with worse outcome. Thirty-day mortality of the total cohort was 61.6% (n = 69) with cardiac failure in 48% and aortic rupture or haemorrhagic shock (28%) as predominant reasons of death. Age [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.09, P = 0.034], preoperative coronary (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.34-9.26, p = 0.012) and spinal malperfusion (OR 12.49, 95% CI 1.83-225.02, P = 0.028) emerged as independent predictors for 30-day mortality while CPR due to tamponade was associated with improved early survival (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.091-0.81, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of underlying cause for CPR is mandatory. Pericardial tamponade, rapidly resolved with pericardial drainage, is a predictor for improved survival, while age and presence of coronary and spinal malperfusion are associated with dismal outcome in this high-risk patient group.

Sex-based outcomes in surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

OBJECTIVE

Epidemiologic variation with respect to sex has been established in aortic dissection. However, current literature on sex-based outcomes in patients with aortic dissection is conflicting. In this study we aimed to compare perioperative outcomes according to sex in patients treated surgically for acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies that reported sex-based differences in postoperative outcomes among patients with acute type A aortic dissection. The primary outcome was in-hospital/30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included postoperative stroke, renal failure requiring dialysis, and reoperation for bleeding. Data were aggregated using the random effects model as pooled risk ratio (RR). Meta-regression was applied to identify sources of heterogeneity between studies.

RESULTS

Nine of 1022 studies were included for final analysis comprising 3338 female and 5979 male participants. Compared with male sex, female sex was associated with similar in-hospital/30-day mortality (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.85-1.28; P = .67), postoperative stroke risk (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.91-1.25; P = .43), and postoperative risk of acute renal failure requiring dialysis (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59-1.19; P = .32). A decreased risk of reoperation for bleeding (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94; P < .01) was observed in female participants. Meta-regression analysis indicated that differences in preoperative shock were a source of heterogeneity in the sex difference in in-hospital/30-day mortality across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients treated surgically for acute type A aortic dissection, female sex was not associated with increased risk of short-term mortality nor with major postoperative complications. Male sex was associated with a greater risk of postoperative bleeding.

Factors Associated with Newly Developed Postoperative Neurological Complications in Patients with Emergency Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Background and Objectives: Postoperative neurological complications (NCs) are an important cause of mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). The aim of the study was to determine the association between intraoperative risk factors and newly developed postoperative NCs in patients after emergency surgery for ATAAD. Materials and Methods: A total of 203 patients requiring emergency surgery were included in the study. Patients with preoperative neurological dysfunction, deceased on the operating table or within the first 48 h after intensive care admission, with uncertain postoperative neurologic status or with incomplete records were excluded. Results: Mean age was 57.61 ± 12.27 years. Hyperlipidemia was the most frequent comorbidity (69%). A bicuspid aortic valve was present in 12.8% of cases, severe acute aortic regurgitation was present in 29.1% of patients, and cardiac tamponade was present in 27.1% of cases. The innominate artery was the most frequently dissected supra-aortic artery in 27.1% of cases. In 65% of cases, the primary entry tear was at the level of the ascending aorta. The incidence of newly developed postoperative NCs was 39.4%. The most common surgical technique performed was supra-coronary ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement, in 53.2% of patients. Using logistic regression, cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.01-1.02; p < 0.001), aortic cross-clamp time over 3 h (OR = 2.71, 95% CI = 1.43-5.14, p = 0.002) and cerebral perfusion time (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.002-1.03; p = 0.027) were independently associated with newly developed postoperative NCs. Conclusions: Based on the results of the study, all efforts should be made to reduce operative times. Using a simple surgical technique, like the supra-coronary ascending aorta and hemiarch technique, whenever possible, and using a simpler technique for cerebral perfusion like unilateral cerebral perfusion via the right axillary artery, could reduce operating times.

Cerebral protection strategies for type A aortic dissection repair

Importance

Techniques to preserve neurological function during type A aortic dissection repairs have been broadly discussed in the literature and heavily debated. Despite the effectiveness of various approaches, a consensus lacks on how to maintain optimal cerebral temperature during surgery. This review examines the three predominant cerebral protection strategies in aortic arch reconstructions: straight deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (sDHCA), retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP), and antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP).

Observations

The signature characteristics of sDHCA, RCP, and ACP are similar-hypothermia, with or without cerebral perfusion. Employing cerebral perfusion techniques may prolong operative times, while ACP permits operation at higher body temperatures, albeit with restricted operative durations.

Conclusion

For type A dissection arch reconstructions, sDHCA, RCP, and ACP can be successfully implemented. Factors such as operative times and individual patient conditions should be considered when choosing a cerebral protection strategy.

Overview of acute type A aortic dissection in India

Acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening surgical emergency. Though the entity is associated with high mortality and morbidity, with well-executed and timely surgical intervention, mortality and morbidity could be reduced to a reasonable extent. Information about demographics, clinical pattern, and results of management of acute TAAD from the Indian subcontinent largely remains unpublished. There are only a few specialized centers performing aortic operations. Very often, the patients with acute TAAD are operated on by surgeons with limited experience and resources. The surgeon is operating like a "lone warrior" without the support of a specialized radiologist, interventionalist, and specialized anesthetist. In most of the hospitals, facilities for sophisticated monitoring, sealants, specialized grafts, and stent graft are not available. We follow a simple algorithm of diagnosis and surgical management. The goal of treatment is to save the life. We follow a conservative approach best suited to our circumstances. Mild hypothermia, carotid cannulation, and antegrade cerebral perfusion as cerebral protection strategies have yielded satisfactory results. In case of organ malperfusion, with some exceptions, we perform aortic repair first. Our policy, towards arch management is less aggressive. In high-risk cases, we perform an endovascular-compliant hemiarch or arch replacement, followed by stent grafting in the post-operative period.

Is central repair with coronary artery bypass grafting enough for multi-organ malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion?

OBJECTIVES

Acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion syndrome is rare but associated with high mortality. Multi-organ malperfusion is an independent predictor of acute type A aortic dissection. Coronary malperfusion requires treatment, but it is not feasible to treat all malperfusions. The adequacy of "central repair and coronary artery bypass grafting" for patients with coronary and other organ malperfusion is unknown.

METHODS

Of the 299 patients who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2018, 21 patients with coronary malperfusion, who received cental repair with coronary artery graft bypass, were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided; into Group M (n = 13, coronary and other organ malperfusion) and Group O (n = 8, coronary malperfusion only). The patient background, surgical content, details of malperfusion, surgical mortality and morbidity, and long-term outcome were compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference in operation time (205 ± 30 vs. 266 ± 88, p = 0.49), but the time from arrival to circulatory arrest tended to be shorter in Group M (81 vs. 134, p = 0.05). Among Group M, cerebral malperfusion was the most common at 92%. Two of the three cases with mesenteric malperfusion died. The mortality of Group M and Group O was 13% and 15% (P = 0.85), respectively. There was no difference in long-term mortality (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Central repair and coronary artery bypass grafting is a sufficiently acceptable treatment for patients with acute type A aortic dissection and multi-organ malperfusion, including coronary malperfusion.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Lower-extremity malperfusion syndrome in patients undergoing proximal aortic surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Objective

Data regarding management of lower-extremity malperfusion in the setting of type A aortic dissection are limited. This study aimed to compare acute type A aortic dissection with lower-extremity malperfusion outcomes in patients undergoing lower-extremity revascularization with no revascularization.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection surgery were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative variables were compared between patients with and without lower-extremity malperfusion. Factors associated with lower-extremity malperfusion, revascularization, and mortality were determined using univariable Cox regression and Firth's penalized likelihood modeling.

Results

From January 2007 to December 2021, 601 patients underwent proximal aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection at a quaternary care center. Of these, 85 of 601 patients (14%) presented with lower-extremity malperfusion and were more often male (P = .02), had concomitant moderate or greater aortic insufficiency (P = .05), had lower ejection fraction (P = .004), had preoperative dialysis dependence (P = .01), and had additional cerebral, visceral, and renal malperfusion syndromes (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier estimated survival fared worse with lower-extremity malperfusion compared with no lower-extremity malperfusion at 1, 5, and 10 years (84% vs 77%, 74% vs 71%, 65% vs 52%, respectively, P = .03). In the lower-extremity malperfusion group, 15 of 85 patients (18%) underwent lower-extremity revascularization without significant differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with patients not undergoing revascularization. Need for peripheral revascularization was associated with peripheral vascular disease (hazard ratio, 3.7 [1.0-14.0], P = .05) and pulse deficit (hazard ratio, 5.6 [1.3-24.0], P = .02) at presentation.

Conclusions

Patients presenting with type A aortic dissection and lower-extremity malperfusion have worse overall survival compared with those without lower-extremity malperfusion. However, not all patients with type A aortic dissection and lower-extremity malperfusion require revascularization.

The role of delayed aortic surgery in type A aortic dissection and mesenteric ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Approximately one third of patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) present with pre-operative malperfusion syndromes (MPS). Of these, mesenteric malperfusion represents the greatest risk to patients with respect to increased short-term mortality. In select patients, it may be feasible to offer a staged approach by treating the mesenteric malperfusion first, optimizing the patient in the intensive care setting and then, following with a central aortic repair. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize cohort studies assessing the role of pre-operative interventions for mesenteric malperfusion.

METHODS

An electronic literature search of five databases was performed to identify all relevant studies providing studies examining short-term mortality on patients who underwent either endovascular or open revascularisation of mesenteric ischemia prior to central aortic repair. The primary outcome was all-cause, short-term mortality. Secondary outcomes were comparative mortality between a delayed repair vs. aortic repair first strategy, rates of postoperative laparotomy, bowel resection, and mortality following delayed aortic repair.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 8 studies qualifying for inclusion, with a total of 180 patients who underwent delayed aortic surgery in the setting of mesenteric MPS. The weighted short-term mortality following a mesenteric revascularisation first, delayed aortic surgery strategy was 22.5%. This strategy was also associated with a significantly lower mortality than a central repair first strategy (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.27), and a significantly lower rate of postoperative laparotomy/bowel resection (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.02-0.14). If patients survive to receive central repair, the weighted short-term mortality postoperatively is low (2.1%).

CONCLUSION

A summary of this evidence reveals a lower short-term mortality in hemodynamically stable patients with mesenteric malperfusion, along with a reduction in postoperative laparotomy/bowel resections. Of those patients who survive to receive central repair, short-term mortality remains very low in the select group of hemodynamically stable patients. Further high-quality studies with randomized or propensity matched data are required to verify these results.

MR Angiography for Aortic Diseases

Aortic pathologic conditions represent diverse disorders, including aortic aneurysm, acute aortic syndrome, traumatic aortic injury, and atherosclerosis. Given the nonspecific clinical features, noninvasive imaging is critical in screening, diagnosis, management, and posttherapeutic surveillance. Of the commonly used imaging modalities, including ultrasound, computed tomography, and MR imaging, the final choice often depends on a combination of factors: acuity of clinical presentation, suspected underlying diagnosis, and institutional practice. Further research is needed to identify the potential clinical role and define appropriate use criteria for advanced MR applications such as four-dimenional flow to manage patients with aortic pathologic conditions.

Preceding Aortic Bare Stenting for Visceral and Limb Malperfusion before Proximal Surgical Repair of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

Mesenteric malperfusion is a fatal complication of acute aortic dissection, which should rapidly be repaired. However, the optimal treatment strategy remains controversial in patients with type A aortic dissection. We report on a case with aortic bare stenting for visceral and lower limb malperfusion prior to the proximal repair. The visceral and limb reperfusion was obtained after aortic bare stenting and proximal repair was successfully performed. This technique can be an alternative option for visceral malperfusion due to type A aortic dissection. However, careful patient selection is required considering the risk of new dissection and rupture.

Outcomes of type A acute aortic dissection with cardiopulmonary arrest: Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-network Registry

OBJECTIVES

Preventing loss of life in patients with type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) who present with cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) can be extremely difficult. Thus, we investigated the early outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with type A AAD who were transported to hospitals belonging to the Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-network between January 2015 and December 2019 were considered for this study. We assessed the early mortality of these patients presenting with CPA and also investigated the differences in outcomes between patients with out-of-hospital and in-hospital CPA.

RESULTS

A total of 3307 patients with type A AAD were transported, 434 (13.1%) of whom presented with CPA. The overall mortality of patients presenting with CPA was 88.2% (383/434), of which 94.5% (240/254) experienced out-of-hospital CPA and 79.4% (143/180) experienced in-hospital CPA (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that aortic surgery [odds ratio (OR), 0.022; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.008-0.060; P < 0.001] and patient age over 80 years (OR, 2.946; 95% CI, 1.012-8.572; P = 0.047) were related with mortality in patients with type A AAD and CPA. Between in-hospital and out-of-hospital CPA, the proportions of DeBakey type 1 (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.065-5.054; P = 0.034), cerebral malperfusion (OR, 0.188; 95% CI, 0.056-0.629; P = 0.007), aortic surgery (OR, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.045-0.271; P = 0.001), age (OR, 0.969; 95% CI, 0.940-0.998; P = 0.039) and the time from symptom onset to hospital admission (OR, 1.122; 95% CI, 1.025-1.228; P = 0.012) were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type A AAD presenting with CPA exhibited extremely high rates of death. Patient outcomes following in-hospital CPA tended to be better than those following out-of-hospital CPA; however, this difference was not significantly different. To prevent deaths, aortic surgery, when possible, should be considered in patients with type A AAD who sustained CPA.

Impact of time from symptom onset to operation on outcome of repair of acute type A aortic dissection with malperfusion

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed patients with acute type A aortic dissection complicated by malperfusion syndrome to establish whether the timing of operative treatment and the location of malperfusion are factors in determining outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 331 patients with acute type A aortic dissection were treated surgically between August 2003 and May 2019. Eighty-four patients (25%) presented with preoperative malperfusion syndrome. Fifty-eight patients with malperfusion syndrome (69%) were transferred to the operating room within 5 hours of the onset of symptoms (immediate repair); 26 patients (31%) were transferred after 5 hours (later repair). We analyzed the effects of immediate aortic repair on surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the early mortality rates between patients with immediate and later aortic repair, which were 20.0% (n = 11/58) and 26.9% (n = 7/19), respectively (P = .12). Preoperative coronary malperfusion was the only predictor of early mortality. The cumulative 5-year survivals of patients with malperfusion syndrome in the immediate and later repair groups were 76.7% and 45.4%, respectively. A significant difference was noted in the long-term outcomes between the 2 groups (P = .02). On multivariable Cox survival analysis, coronary malperfusion and shock on arrival were associated with increased long-term mortality (P < .01 and P = .04). Conducting surgery within 5 hours of the onset of symptoms was a significant predictor of favorable long-term outcome (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although preoperative coronary malperfusion and shock on arrival worsened the long-term outcomes in patients undergoing aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection with preoperative malperfusion syndrome, conducting an operation within 5 hours of the onset of symptoms significantly improved their long-term outcomes.

A Computational Study of Dynamic Obstruction in Type B Aortic Dissection

A serious complication in aortic dissection is dynamic obstruction of the true lumen (TL). Dynamic obstruction results in malperfusion, a blockage of blood flow to a vital organ. Clinical data reveal that increases in central blood pressure promote dynamic obstruction. However, the mechanisms by which high pressures result in TL collapse are underexplored and poorly understood. Here, we developed a computational model to investigate biomechanical and hemodynamical factors involved in Dynamic obstruction. We hypothesize that relatively small pressure gradient between TL and false lumen (FL) are sufficient to displace the flap and induce obstruction. An idealized fluid-structure interaction model of type B aortic dissection was created. Simulations were performed under mean cardiac output while inducing dynamic changes in blood pressure by altering FL outflow resistance. As FL resistance increased, central aortic pressure increased from 95.7 to 115.3 mmHg. Concurrent with blood pressure increase, flap motion was observed, resulting in TL collapse, consistent with clinical findings. The maximum pressure gradient between TL and FL over the course of the dynamic obstruction was 4.5 mmHg, consistent with our hypothesis. Furthermore, the final stage of dynamic obstruction was very sudden in nature, occurring over a short time (<1 s) in our simulation, consistent with the clinical understanding of this dramatic event. Simulations also revealed sudden drops in flow and pressure in the TL in response to the flap motion, consistent with first stages of malperfusion. To our knowledge, this study represents the first computational analysis of potential mechanisms driving dynamic obstruction in aortic dissection.

The Anzhen Risk Scoring System for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Observational Study Protocol

Introduction: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a catastrophic disease with fatal outcomes. Malperfusion syndrome (MPS) is a serious complication of ATAAD, with an incidence of 20–40%. Many studies have shown that MPS is the main risk factor for poor ATAAD prognosis. However, a risk scoring system for ATAAD based on MPS is lacking. Here, we designed a risk scoring system for ATAAD to assess mortality through quantitative assessment of relevant organ malperfusion and subsequently develop rational treatment strategies.

Methods and analysis: This was a prospective observational study. Patients’ perioperative clinical data were collected to establish a database of ATAAD (N≥3000) and determine whether these patients had malperfusion complications. The Anzhen risk scoring system was established on the basis of organ malperfusion by using a random forest survival model and a logistics model. The better method was then chosen to establish a revised risk scoring system.

Ethics and dissemination: This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committees of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University (KS2019034-1). Patient consent was waived because biological samples were not collected, and no patient rights were violated. Findings will be disseminated at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed publications.

S100B predicts neurological injury and 30-day mortality following surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neurological injuries are frequent following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) repair occurring in 4-30% of all patients. Our objective was to study whether S100B can predict neurological injury following ATAAD repair.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. The study included all patients that underwent ATAAD repair at our institution between Jan 1998 and Dec 2021 and had recorded S100B-values. The primary outcome measure was neurological injury, defined as focal neurological deficit or coma diagnosed by clinical assessment with or without radiological confirmation and with a symptom duration of more than 24 h. Secondary outcome measure was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

538 patients underwent surgery during the study period and 393 patients, had recorded S100B-values. The patients had a mean age of 64.4 ± 11.1 years and 34% were female. Receiver operating characteristic curve for S100B 24 h postoperatively yielded area under the curve 0.687 (95% CI 0.615-0.759) and best Youden's index corresponded to S100B 0.225 which gave a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 75%. Multivariable logistic regression identified S100B ≥ 0.23 μg/l at 24 h as an independent predictor for neurological injury (OR 4.71, 95% CI 2.59-8.57; p < 0.01) along with preoperative cerebral malperfusion (OR 4.23, 95% CI 2.03-8.84; p < 0.01) as well as an independent predictor for 30-day mortality (OR 4.57, 95% CI 1.18-11.70; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that S100B, 24 h after surgery is a strong independent predictor for neurological injury and 30-day mortality after ATAAD repair.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

As this was a retrospective observational study it was not registered.

Fluid-structure interaction simulation of visceral perfusion and impact of different cannulation methods on aortic dissection

Hemodynamics in aortic dissection (AD) is closely associated with the risk of aortic aneurysm, rupture, and malperfusion. Altered blood flow in patients with AD can lead to severe complications such as visceral malperfusion. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of cannulation flow on hemodynamics in AD using a fluid-structure interaction simulation. We developed a specific-idealized AD model that included an intimal tear in the descending thoracic aorta, a re-entry tear in the left iliac artery, and nine branches. Two different cannulation methods were tested: (1) axillary cannulation (AC) only through the brachiocephalic trunk and (2) combined axillary and femoral cannulation (AFC) through the brachiocephalic trunk and the right common iliac artery. AC was found to result in the development of a pressure difference between the true lumen and false lumen, owing to the difference in the flow rate through each lumen. This pressure difference collapsed the true lumen, disturbing blood flow to the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. However, in AFC, the pressure levels between the two lumens were similar, and no collapse occurred. Moreover, the visceral flow was higher than that in AC. Lastly, the stiffness of the intimal flap affected the true lumen's collapse.

Stenting in Brain Hemodynamic Injury of Carotid Origin Caused by Type A Aortic Dissection: Local Experience and Systematic Literature Review

In this study, we report our local experience of type A aortic dissections in patients with cerebral malperfusion treated with carotid stenting before or after aortic surgery, and present a systematic literature review on these patients treated either with carotid stenting (CS) before or after aortic surgery (AS) or with aortic and carotid surgery alone (ACS). We report on patients treated in our center with carotid stenting for brain hemodynamic injury of carotid origin caused by type A dissection since 2018, and a systematic review was conducted in PubMed for articles published from 1990 to 2021. Out of 5307 articles, 19 articles could be included with a total of 80 patients analyzed: 9 from our center, 29 patients from case reports, and 51 patients from two retrospective cohorts. In total, 8 patients were treated by stenting first, 72 by surgery first, and 7 by stenting after surgery. The mean age; initial NIHSS score; time from symptom onset to treatment; post-treatment clinical improvement; post-treatment clinical worsening; mortality rate; follow-up duration; and follow-up mRS were, respectively, for each group (local cohort, CS before AS, ACS, CS after AS): 71.2 ± 5.3 yo, 65.5 ± 11.0 yo; 65.3 ± 13.1 yo, 68.7 ± 5.8 yo; 4 ± 8.4, 11.3 ± 8.5, 14.3 ± 8.0, 0; 11.8 ± 14.3 h, 21 ± 39.3 h, 13.6 ± 17.8 h, 13 ± 17.2 h; 56%, 71%, 86%, 57%; 11%, 28%, 0%, 14%; 25%, 12.3%, 14%, 33%; 5.25 ± 2.9 months, 54 months, 6.8 ± 3.8 months, 14 ± 14.4 months; 1 ± 1; 0.25 ± 0.5, 1.3 ± 0.8, 0.68 ± 0.6. Preoperative carotid stenting for hemodynamic cerebral malperfusion by true lumen compression appears to be feasible, and could be effective and safe, although there is still a lack of evidence due to the absence of comparative statistical analysis. The literature, albeit growing, is still limited, and prospective comparative studies are needed.

Optimal Extent of Repair for Acute Type I Aortic Dissection-Frozen Elephant Trunk? How Long and Why?

Acute Type A dissection is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent surgical treatment. The operative technique involves repairs of a variety of distal extents of the transverse aortic arch and the downstream aorta. We review the evidence surrounding the extent of repair for acute Type A aortic dissection and describe our approach to this disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.