Statin adherence and LDL cholesterol levels. Should we assess adherence prior to statin upgrade?

Effectiveness of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in secondary cardiovascular prevention

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of statin treatment to reduce coronary events and mortality has been hardly examined considering goals of LDL-C. We aimed to analyse such association in secondary cardiovascular prevention.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of electronic health records from the SIDIAP database, Catalonia-Spain. Recruitment period was from 2006 to 2017 and study period finished at the end of 2018. We included 54,175 people aged ≥35 years in cardiovascular secondary prevention starting statin treatment. We analysed the association of achieved LDL-C goals after statin initiation with coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Mean age was 69 years and 20,146 (37.2%) were women. Coronary heart disease occurred in 5687 (10.5%) participants, and 10,676 (19.7%) persons passed away. Median follow-up lasted 5.7 years (interquartile range, 3.4-8.1). The coronary heart disease HRs (95% CI) for the LDL-C goals of 70-100, <70-55 and <55 mg/dL were .86 (.81-.92), .83 (.76-.9) and .8 (.72-.88), respectively. They were .89 (.83-.96) in the group with 30%-40% reduction and .86 (.8-.93) in the groups with 40%-50% and ≥50% reduction. We observed no association with mortality. We observed no relevant differences by sex or age.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-level retrospective analysis of real-world data observed that treatment with statins is effective to achieve certain LDL-C goals and CHD reduction. The lack of significant difference between LDL-C goals needs confirmation in additional studies with real-world data. The LDL-C target should consider the magnitude of the decrease in coronary events.

Persistence and Adherence to PCSK9 Inhibitor Monoclonal Antibodies Versus Ezetimibe in Real-World Settings

INTRODUCTION

The cardiovascular disease risk reduction benefits of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9i mAb) and ezetimibe are dependent on remaining on treatment and being persistent and adherent. We estimated the percentage of patients on therapy, persistent and adherent at 182 and 365 days among US adults with health insurance who initiated a PCSK9i mAb (n = 16,588) or ezetimibe (n = 83,086) between July 2015 and December 2019.

METHODS

Using pharmacy fill claims, being on therapy was defined as having a day of medication supply in the last 60 of 182 and 365 days following treatment initiation, being persistent was defined as not having a gap of 60 days or more between the last day of supply from one prescription fill and the next fill, and being adherent was defined by having medication available to take on ≥ 80% of the 182 and 365 days following treatment initiation. We estimated multivariable-adjusted risk ratios for being persistent and adherent comparing patients initiating PCSK9i mAb versus ezetimibe using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

At 182 days following initiation, 80% and 68% were on therapy and 76% and 64% were persistent among patients who initiated a PCSK9i mAb and ezetimibe, respectively. Among patients who were on therapy and persistent at 182 days following initiation, 88% and 81% of those who initiated a PCSK9i mAb and ezetimibe, respectively, were on therapy at 365 days. Among those on therapy and persistent at 182 days following initiation, being persistent and being adherent at 365 days were each more common among PCSK9i mAb versus ezetimibe initiators (persistent: 82% versus 76%, multivariable-adjusted risk ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.08; adherent: 74% versus 71%, multivariable-adjusted risk ratio 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest approaches to increase persistence and adherence to PCSK9i mAb and ezetimibe should be implemented prior to or within 182 days following treatment initiation.

Lack of Awareness of Own Hypercholesterolemia or Statin Medication among Adult Statin Users in the United States: Prevalence and Patient Characteristics in a Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

Knowledge of a patient’s medication is important in treating hyperlipidemia; however, little is known about this in practice. We carried out a repeated cross-sectional study to analyze a nationally representative sample of US adult statin users from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999−2018. We used medication bottle checks and self-reported survey data to estimate the percentage of individuals who are unaware of their hypercholesterolemia, type of medication, or how to take their medication. We used logistic regression to examine their characteristics. We included 8798 statin users; however, 17.6% were unaware of their hypercholesterolemia or statin use. Being older, male, non-Hispanic Black, taking a wider range of prescription medications, and previous diabetes or cardiovascular disease diagnosis were associated with lack of awareness. Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was lower among those lacking awareness (85.5 vs. 100.7 mg/dL; p < 0.001). Many of those unaware of drug type had been given little information about statins; 34.0% had no diagnosis of diabetes or cardiovascular disease, and of these, 27.1% were >75 years old. Roughly one in six lacked awareness, but no association was found with hypercholesterolemia control. Healthcare providers should ascertain a patient’s understanding and consider the risks and benefits of statin medication.

LDL‑induced NLRC3 inflammasome activation in cardiac fibroblasts contributes to cardiomyocytic dysfunction

Heart failure (HF) is a progressive myocardial disease that affects pulse rate. Notably, chronic inflammation serves a crucial role in cardiac dysfunction and HF. Appropriate cardiomyocyte‑fibroblast communication is essential for cardiac function. In addition, cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) are the main cellular population in the cardiac microenvironment; therefore, determining the role of CFs in HF progression and the associated molecular basis is important. In the present study, ELISAs were performed to detect inflammatory factors in the sera of patients with HF and their association with CF activation was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The mechanism underlying the proinflammatory phenotype of CFs was investigated via western blotting. Notably, the levels of IL10 and TNF‑α were significantly increased in the sera of patients with HF. Further analysis revealed that CFs were extensively activated in the cardiac tissues of patients with HF and released excessive amounts of cytokines, which could impair the viability of cardiomyocytes. Moreover, low‑density lipoprotein (LDL)‑induced NLRC3 inflammasome was activated in CFs, which gave rise to proinflammatory phenotypes. Targeting LDL in CFs significantly improved the functioning of cardiomyocytes and inhibited apoptosis. These findings highlighted the critical role of LDL in inflammasome activation; to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to reveal that CF‑induced microenvironmental inflammation may suppress cardiomyocyte viability. The present study established the cellular basis for CF activation during HF progression and provided information on the cellular interactions important for HF treatment.

Evaluating the Impact of Outpatient Multi-Dose Medication Packaging Service (MDMPS) on Medication Adherence and Clinical Outcomes

Background:

There is limited understanding on the impact of the multidose medication packaging service (MDMPS).

Objectives:

The main objective of this study was to evaluate changes in medication adherence in patients using MDMPS compared to patients receiving standard medication packaging (control group). The other objectives were to determine the association between medication adherence and clinical outcomes, and to assess patients’/caregivers’ perceptions toward MDMPS.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among primary care patients in Singapore enrolled into MDMPS between 2012 and 2017. Eligible patients were taking at least five chronic medications, diagnosed with Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia and/or Type 2 Diabetes, with prescription records for at least six months before and after the index period. They were matched to control patients based on the type of comorbidities and medication adherence status. Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) of both groups were compared between baseline and at least six months post-index period. Interviewer-administered questionnaires were also conducted for MDMPS patients.

Results:

The MPR of MDMPS patients (n = 100) increased by 0.37% (P < .001) compared to the control group (n = 100). MDMPS patients with diabetes had reduced HbA1c by 0.1% after six months (P = .022) but was not significant after 12 months. No significant changes were seen in blood pressure and LDL-C between both groups. At least 50% of patients were highly satisfied with MDMPS.

Conclusion:

MDMPS can improve medication adherence. Further studies are needed to understand its clinical impact.

Real-world evaluation of the impact of statin intensity on adherence and persistence to therapy: A Scottish population-based study

Aim

To assess associations between statin intensity and adherence, persistence and discontinuation of statin therapy in Scotland.

Method

Retrospective cohort study, using linked electronic health records covering a period from January 2009 to December 2016. The study cohort included adult patients (≥18 years) newly initiating statins within Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland. Study outcomes comprised adherence, discontinuation and persistence to treatment, stratified by three exposure groups (high, moderate and low intensity). Discontinuation and persistence were calculated using the refill‐gap and anniversary methods, respectively. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was used as a proxy for adherence. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate discontinuation, and associations between adherence/persistence and statin intensity were assessed using logistic regression.

Results

A total of 73 716 patients with a mean age of 61.4 ± 12.6 years were included; the majority (88.3%) received moderate intensity statins. Discontinuation rates differed between intensity levels, with high‐intensity patients less likely to discontinue treatment compared to those on moderate intensity (prior cardiovascular disease [CVD]: HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.34‐0.55]; no prior CVD: 0.80 [0.74‐0.86]). Persistence declined over time, and high‐intensity patients had the highest persistence rates. Overall, 52.6% of patients were adherent to treatment (PDC ≥ 80%), but adherence was considerably higher among high‐intensity patients (63.7%).

Conclusion

High‐intensity statins were associated with better persistence and adherence to treatment, but overall long‐term persistence and adherence remain a challenge, particularly among patients without prior CVD. This needs addressing.

Prescription switching: Rationales and risks

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug switching is commonplace across a broad range of indications and, within a drug class, is often facilitated by the availability of multiple drugs considered equivalent. Such treatment changes are often considered to improve outcomes via better efficacy or fewer side effects, or to be more cost-effective. Drug switching can be both appropriate and beneficial for several reasons; however, switching can also be associated with negative consequences.

AIM

To consider the impact of switching in two situations: the use of statins as a well-studied example of within-class drug switching, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-targeting drug switching as an example of cross-class switching.

RESULTS

With the example of statins, within-class switching may be justified to reduce side effects, although the decision to switch is often also driven by the lower cost of generic formulations. With the example of GnRH agonists/antagonists, switching often occurs without the realisation that these drugs belong to different classes, with potential clinical implications.

CONCLUSION

Lessons emerging from these examples will help inform healthcare practitioners who may be considering switching drug prescriptions.

Adherence to statin therapy favours survival of patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease

AIMS 

We hypothesized that adherence to statin therapy determines survival in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS 

Single-centre longitudinal observational study with 691 symptomatic PAD patients. Mortality was evaluated over a mean follow-up of 50 ± 26 months. We related statin adherence and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target attainment to all-cause mortality. Initially, 73% of our PAD patients were on statins. At follow-up, we observed an increase to 81% (P < 0.0001). Statin dosage, normalized to simvastatin 40 mg, increased from 50 to 58 mg/day (P < 0.0001), and was paralleled by a mean decrease of LDL-C from 97 to 82 mg/dL (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients receiving a high-intensity statin increased over time from 38% to 62% (P < 0.0001). Patients never receiving statins had a significant higher mortality rate (31%) than patients continuously on statins (13%) or having newly received a statin (8%; P < 0.0001). Moreover, patients on intensified statin medication had a low mortality of 9%. Those who terminated statin medication or reduced statin dosage had a higher mortality (34% and 20%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that adherence to or an increase of the statin dosage (both P = 0.001), as well as a newly prescribed statin therapy (P = 0.004) independently predicted reduced mortality.

CONCLUSION 

Our data suggest that adherence to statin therapy is associated with reduced mortality in symptomatic PAD patients. A strategy of intensive and sustained statin therapy is recommended.

Evidence to Support Inclusion of Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers in Randomised Controlled Trials

Pharmacogenetics and biomarkers are becoming normalised as important technologies to improve drug efficacy rates, reduce the incidence of adverse drug reactions, and make informed choices for targeted therapies. However, their wider clinical implementation has been limited by a lack of robust evidence. Suitable evidence is required before a biomarker's clinical use, and also before its use in a clinical trial. We have undertaken a review of five pharmacogenetic biomarker-guided randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and evaluated the evidence used by these trials to justify biomarker inclusion. We assessed and quantified the evidence cited in published rationale papers, or where these were not available, obtained protocols from trial authors. Very different levels of evidence were provided by the trials. We used these observations to write recommendations for future justifications of biomarker use in RCTs and encourage regulatory authorities to write clear guidelines.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Factors Associated With Nonadherence and Discontinuation of Statins Among People Aged ≥65 Years

Background

Older individuals (aged ≥65 years) are commonly prescribed statins but may experience a range of barriers in adhering to therapy. The factors associated with poor statin adherence and/or discontinuation among this population have not been comprehensively reviewed.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review to identify English articles published through December 12, 2016 that reported factors associated with nonadherence and/or discontinuation of statins among older persons. Data were pooled via random-effects meta-analysis techniques.

Results

Forty-five articles reporting data from more than 1.8 million older statin users from 13 countries were included. The factors associated with increased statin nonadherence were black/non-white race (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-1.98), female gender (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13), current smoker (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.21), higher copayments (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.25-1.52), new user (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.21-2.07), lower number of concurrent cardiovascular medications (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.09), primary prevention (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.40-1.59), having respiratory disorders (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.23) or depression (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.16), and not having renal disease (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.14). The factors associated with increased statin discontinuation were lower income status (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06-1.36), current smoker (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.23), higher copayment (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.53-1.70), higher number of medications (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06), presence of dementia (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.36), cancer (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.11-1.33) or respiratory disorders (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.34), primary prevention (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.24-2.22), and not having hypertension (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20) or diabetes (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15).

Conclusion

Interventions that target potentially modifiable factors including financial and social barriers, patients' perceptions about disease risk as well as polypharmacy may improve statin use in the older population.

Intensive Versus Moderate Statin Therapy Discontinuation in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

PURPOSE

The differences of discontinuation risk between intensive and mild-to-moderate statin therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke is not clear. This study aimed to clarify whether intensive statin therapy resulted in a significant increase in discontinuation early after discharge.

METHODS

This multicenter registry study enrolled consecutive hospitalized patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. All the patients were prescribed statin therapy at discharge. Intensity of statin therapy was defined according to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between statin therapy intensity and discontinuation.

FINDINGS

This study included 505 patients, of whom 64 and 441 received intensive and moderate statin therapy, respectively (mean follow-up, approximately 6 months). The rates of discontinuation of intensive and moderate statin therapy were 31.3% and 10.7% (P < 0.001), respectively. Variables with significant differences between the intensive and moderate statin therapy groups were included in the adjusted logistic regression model. Intensive statin therapy significantly increased discontinuation risk by 273.0% (odds ratio = 3.730; 95% CI, 2.013-6.911; P < .001) compared with moderate statin therapy. The result was consistent in most subgroups, except for patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores ≥4.

IMPLICATIONS

In stroke secondary prevention, intensive statin therapy may significantly increase the risk of early discontinuation compared with moderate statin therapy. Future clinical trials that involve a comparison between intensive and moderate statin therapy for stroke secondary prevention should address the differences in discontinuation between these 2 groups.

Contemporary rates and correlates of statin use and adherence in nondiabetic adults with cardiovascular risk factors: The KP CHAMP study

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy is highly efficacious in the prevention of fatal and nonfatal atherosclerotic events in persons at increased cardiovascular risk. However, its long-term effectiveness in practice depends on a high level of medication adherence by patients.

METHODS

We identified nondiabetic adults with cardiovascular risk factors between 2008 and 2010 within a large integrated health care delivery system in Northern California. Through 2013, we examined the use and adherence of newly initiated statin therapy based on data from dispensed prescriptions from outpatient pharmacy databases.

RESULTS

Among 209,704 eligible adults, 68,085 (32.5%) initiated statin therapy during the follow-up period, with 90.4% receiving low-potency statins. At 12 and 24 months after initiating statins, 84.3% and 80.2%, respectively, were actively receiving statin therapy, but only 42% and 30%, respectively, had no gaps in treatment during those time periods. There was also minimal switching between statins or use of other lipid-lowering therapies for augmentation during follow-up. Age≥50 years, Asian/Pacific Islander race, Hispanic ethnicity, prior myocardial infarction, prior ischemic stroke, hypertension, and baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol>100 mg/dL were associated with higher adjusted odds, whereas female gender, black race, current smoking, dementia were associated with lower adjusted odds, of active statin treatment at 12 months after initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

There remain opportunities for improving prevention in patients at risk for cardiovascular events. Our study identified certain patient subgroups that may benefit from interventions to enhance medication adherence, particularly by minimizing treatment gaps and discontinuation of statin therapy within the first year of treatment.

A systematic review to assess adherence and persistence with statins

OBJECTIVE

To identify and assess studies published over a 10 year period up to February 2016 which measure adherence or persistence with statins, to summarize their methods, strengths and weaknesses and to summarize evidence linking statin adherence/persistence with risk of cardiovascular events.

METHODS

Electronic databases and abstracts from four major cardiovascular disease conferences were searched from January 2005 to February 2016. The study selection process was performed by two reviewers working independently. Studies were included if they reported data regarding patient adherence or persistence with statins in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia, using any type of study design or length of follow-up. One reviewer extracted the study data and assessed study quality, which was checked by a second reviewer independently. Given the heterogeneity between the included studies a narrative critique and summary is presented.

RESULTS

We report on 84 real world studies which aimed to assess adherence or persistence with statins. The majority of studies concluded that good adherence/persistence was associated with reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality. In two studies high intensity statin regimens were associated with poorer patient adherence when compared to low intensity statins. Adherence and persistence with statin therapy also has an impact on hospitalization costs and other cardiovascular disease (CVD) related costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence and persistence are associated with a reduction in CVD events and mortality. There was limited evidence to suggest that high intensity statin regimens are associated with poorer treatment adherence when compared to lower intensity regimens. Hence, more robust studies are required to establish this association. As recommended by the 2013 ACC/AHA, 2016 ESC and several other clinical guidelines, clinicians and pharmacy managers should regularly monitor statin therapy adherence.

Blood pressure and lipid target adherence in Korean patients receiving angiotensin II receptor blockers/statin regimens

OBJECTIVES

Hypertension and dyslipidemia are important cardiovascular risk factors. Simultaneously controlling blood pressure (BP) and lipid levels is effective in preventing cardiovascular events and premature death. This study investigated the association between adherence to angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/statin regimens and BP or low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) target attainment in Korean patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter study, we collected case report forms (CRFs) of hypertensive patients with concomitant dyslipidemia who were prescribed an ARB/statin regimen between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2015 from 51 outpatient clinics. A total of 672 and 609 patients were eventually included for statistical analyses of BP and LDL-C, respectively. Adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR) for 6 months following the index date.

RESULTS

The overall rates of attaining BP and LDL-C targets were 75.6% and 81.1%, respectively. The mean value of MPR for patients attaining target BP or LDL-C was significantly higher than that for those not attaining target BP or LDL-C. After adjustment for all covariates, increases in the quartiles of MPR were significantly associated with an increased probability of attaining target BP or LDL-C in all models (all p-trend <0.05). Attaining of BP control was significantly higher in quartiles 3 and 4 of MPR (MPR >0.95) than the lowest MPR (quartile 1), whereas attaining LDL-C target was associated with quartile 4 of MPR (MPR >0.97).

CONCLUSION

We identified a strong correlation between medication adherence and BP or LDL-C target achievement in Korean patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia. The adherence for reaching targets could be different between BP and LDL-C levels.

Correlation of compliance to statin therapy with lipid profile and serum HMGCoA reductase levels in dyslipidemic patients

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of statin therapy may be lost or vary with reduction in compliance and intensity of statin therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To study and correlate the quantitative effect of compliance on lipid profile and 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCoA-R) levels in dyslipidemic patients.

METHODS

Compliance to different intensity of statin therapy assessed by pill count was correlated with serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and HMGCoA-R.

RESULTS

Out of 200 patients, 160 received moderate intensity statin therapy whereas 40 were on high intensity statin therapy. The overall mean compliance of patients was 56.7%. The compliance of patients on moderate intensity statin therapy was higher (56.8%) than those on high intensity (56.4%) (p=0.92). There was significant inverse correlation (p<0.05) between compliance and TC, TG, LDL-C and HMGCoA-R levels and positive correlation (p<0.05) with HDL-C levels. The mean serum HMGCoA-R levels did not fall below 9-10ng/mL when compliance to either moderate or high intensity statin therapy was increased above 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

It is appropriate to improve the compliance to existing statin therapy than switching over to higher intensity statin therapy. Estimation of HMGCoA-R levels may be explored as a surrogate marker to monitor and assess the compliance of patients to statin therapy.

Burden of First and Recurrent Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Hyperlipidemia

BACKGROUND

Acute cardiovascular (CV) events have been evaluated in patients with specific comorbidities but have not focused on patients with hyperlipidemia or on the their long-term costs.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate incidence of CV events, costs, and resource utilization among patients with hyperlipidemia and baseline risk of CV disease (CVD).

METHODS

Patients (age 18 to 64 years) diagnosed with hyperlipidemia or using lipid-modifying medications were identified from administrative claims. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts based on pre-index clinical characteristics-secondary prevention (SP; history of CV event, n = 15 613); high risk (HR; CVD, n = 47 600); and primary prevention (PP; no CV event history or CVD, n = 60 637)-and followed up to 2 years after the CV event.

RESULTS

During follow-up, ≥1 new CV event occurred in 43.0% of the SP cohort, 33.9% of HR, and 20.9% of PP; and ≥3 new events occurred in 19.8% of the SP cohort, 12.9% of HR, and 5.5% of PP. Incremental total costs were $19 320 for SP, $20 003 for HR, and $17 650 for PP. Compared with patients with only 1 CV event, the mean 2-year cost was 30% higher in patients with 2 CV events and 48% higher in patients with 3 CV events. Only 50% of HR patients (with or without CV events) received statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with recurrent CV events had higher total health care costs during 24-month follow-up for each type of CV event. Total health care costs among patients with a CV event were higher for the initial as well as subsequent events. Statins and lipid-modifying medications were significantly underutilized in all cohorts, despite the presence of CVD.