Impact of syncope and pre-syncope on short-term mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

[Characterization of patients with syncope in the emergency department-secondary diagnoses and laboratory parameters of inpatients versus outpatients]

Over 1391 patients presented to the emergency department (ED) of a German university hospital with primary diagnosis of syncope from 2019-2022. This monocentric, retrospective study aims to characterize this cohort regarding secondary diagnoses and blood laboratory parameters. Principal focus lay on the differentiation between inpatients (n = 190; 13.7%) and outpatients (n = 1201; 86.3%). Most common secondary diagnoses comprised head injury (n = 188; 13.5%), infection (n = 126; 9.1%), body injury (n = 124; 8.9%), neurological disease (n = 85; 6.1%), arrhythmogenic heart failure (n = 76; 5.5%), cardiovascular risk factors (n = 75; 5.4%), metabolic/nephrological disease (n = 69; 5.0%), and structural heart disease (n = 68; 4.9%). Surgical interventions were performed using catheter (n = 16; 1.2%), percutaneous coronary interventions (n = 15; 1.1%), and pacemaker/defibrillator/event recorders (n = 12; 0.9%). Inpatients had significantly more secondary diagnoses (3.5 vs. 0.3) and higher incidences of abnormal laboratory parameters compared to outpatients. Secondary diagnoses more common in inpatients included cardiovascular risk factors (37.9 vs. 0.2%), arrhythmogenic heart failure (35.3 vs. 0.7%), infection (57.9 vs. 1.3%), and lung disease (6.3 vs. 0.2%). Abnormal blood laboratory values more frequent in inpatients included elevated levels of highly sensitive (hs) troponin T (58.8 vs. 25.7%), creatinine (36.2 vs. 14.8%), leukocytes (43.4 vs. 36.3%), besides decreased hemoglobin (33.3 vs. 16.0%), potassium (5.3 vs. 1.2%), and sodium (2.1 vs. 0.6%).

Analysis of clinical characteristics in 1940 patients with acute pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

The clinical characteristics of acute pulmonary embolism (APE) according to mortality risk has been partly explored. Further research is required in light of the latest guide update on risk stratification for APE.

METHODS

We collected the data from hospitalized patients with APE. Patients were classified according to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology's (ESC) guidelines. The clinical traits between different risk stratification of APE was investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 1940 patients had APE. Patients who were stratified as high risk showed the highest frequency of both syncope (4.5 % vs 6.6 % vs 12.7 %; P = 0.002) and dyspnea (61.9 % vs 73.0 % vs 73.8 %, P = 0.007) when compared to the other two groups. The rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) were: 49.4 % in low-risk stratification, 63.2 % in intermediate-risk stratification, and 68.1 % in high-risk stratification, (Pfor trend = 0.001), while the proportion of low-risk stratification patients increased (2.5 %-13.3 %, Pfor trend<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, clinical characteristics differ among pulmonary embolism patients with different risk stratification. Furthermore, the percentage of low-risk patients increased progressively while overall in-hospital death rates among APE patients gradually decreased.

Impact of chest pain on mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

Evidence for the prognostic impact of chest pain in acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is limited. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of chest pain in a Chinese cohort of patients with APE. Consecutive hospitalized patients diagnosed with APE between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled and followed prospectively for 2 years at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The primary outcome was in-hospital all- cause mortality, while the secondary outcomes included 3-month, 6-month, and 2-year all-cause mortality, APE recurrence, mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay (LOS). A total of 737 APE patients met the study criteria, with 254 patients (34.5%) presented with chest pain at admission. Patients with chest pain had significantly lower in-hospital (3.1% vs. 11.2%), 3-month (3.7% vs. 7.5%), 6-month (5.3% vs. 10.0%), and 2-year (9.8% vs. 15.4%) all-cause mortality compared to patients without chest pain (all P < 0.05). A lower rate of mechanical ventilation was observed in APE patients with chest pain, and no significant differences were identified in terms of APE recurrence and LOS between APE patients with and without chest pain. Chest pain was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in three separate multivariable models (range of odds ratios 0.390-0.423, all P < 0.05). APE patients with chest pain had a lower short-term and long-term all-cause mortality compared to those without chest pain. Chest pain may be considered a strong, favorable prognostic marker in acute pulmonary embolism.

Incidence of Mortality and Complications in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The relationship between the early hemodynamic consequences of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and short-term morbidity and mortality has long been recognized. The mortality incidence and other complications after high-risk (massive) PE, the most severe category of the disease, are summarized in this meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting on patients with massive PE indexed by PubMed and the Cochrane Library over a 10-year period (2010-2020) was conducted. Studies with adequate information to specify a cohort of patients with high-risk PE defined by the American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology criteria and their clinical outcomes were included. Incidences were calculated as weighted averages with 95% CIs.

Results

A total of 27 publications spanning 1517 patients were identified that met the search criteria for high-risk PE. In-hospital all-cause mortality averaged 28.3% (95% CI, 20.9%-37.0%) in patients at high risk, comparable to the 30-day all-cause mortality of 30.2% (95% CI, 22.3%-39.6%). In-hospital major bleeding was 13.8% (95% CI, 9.3%-20.0%), and intracranial hemorrhage was reported in 3.6% (95% CI, 2.2%-5.9%). The risk of bias in publications was graded as low-to-moderate, with substantial heterogeneity among the studies.

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis provided low-quality to moderate-quality evidence documenting mortality, major bleeding, and other complications in patients meeting the American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology criteria for high-risk PE. This information was used to inform the design of the FLowTriever for Acute Massive Pulmonary Embolism (FLAME) study (NCT04795167), a study evaluating an advanced therapy for patients with high-risk PE.

Clinical Differences and Outcomes of COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Thromboembolism in Comparison with Non-COVID-19 Pulmonary Thromboembolism

(1) Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been reported to increase the risk of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). The aim of this study is to elucidate whether Coronavirus disease COVID-19-associated PTE has a different clinical expression than non-COVID-19 PTE due to a different pathophysiology. (2) Methods: retrospective study of PTE episodes conducted at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2020, comparing the group of COVID-19-associated PTE patients with a control group of non-COVID-19 PTE patients. (3) Results: A total of 229 patients with PTE were registered, 79 of whom had COVID-19. Cancer (15.2% vs. 39.3%; p < 0.001), previous surgery (0% vs. 8%; p = 0.01), previous VTE (2.5% vs. 15.3%; p = 0.003), signs and/or symptoms of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (7.6% vs. 22.7%; p = 0.004) and syncope (1.3% vs. 8.1%; p = 0.035) were less frequent in the COVID-19 group. Central thrombosis was more frequent in the control group (35.3% vs. 13.9%; p = 0.001). No VTE recurrent episodes were observed in the COVID-19 group, whereas four (2.7%) episodes were recorded for the control group. One-month bleeding rate was higher in the COVID-19 group (10.1% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.004). (4) Conclusion: COVID-19-associated PTE has clinical characteristics that differ from those of PTE without COVID-19, including inferior severity and a lower rate of VTE recurrence. Physicians should be aware of the high risk of bleeding in the first month of COVID-19-associated PTE.

Major bleeding in patients with pulmonary embolism presenting with syncope

INTRODUCTION

Syncope has been shown to be a risk factor of bleeding in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Whether syncope predicts bleeding in a broader population of patients with PE remains unknown.

METHODS

We used the RIETE registry data to assess whether initial presentation with syncope could predict bleeding in PE patients receiving anticoagulant therapy, and to explore the association between presence of syncope and timing and site of major bleeding events.

RESULTS

Among 45,765 patients with acute PE from March 2001 to January 2021, 6760 (14.8%) had syncope. Patients with syncope were older and more likely to have hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxaemia or elevated troponin levels than those without syncope. They also were more likely to receive thrombolytics. During the first 90 days, 1097 patients (2.4%) suffered major bleeding (gastrointestinal 335, hematoma 271 and intracranial 163) and 3611 died (158 had fatal bleeding). Patients with syncope had a higher rate of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.41-1.89) and a nonsignificantly higher rate of fatal bleeding (OR: 1.47; 95% CI: 0.99-2.17) than those without syncope. Multivariable analysis confirmed that patients with syncope were at increased risk for major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.15-1.55). On sensitivity analysis, the increased risk for major bleeding was confirmed in patients initially receiving anticoagulant therapy without thrombolytics at 7 days (aHR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.13-1.91) and 90 days (aHR: 1.33; 95%CI: 1.13-1.56).

DISCUSSION

Syncope is a predictor of major bleeding events in patients with PE, even among those receiving anticoagulation monotherapy.

Clinical Phenotypes With Prognostic Implications in Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Syncope

Objectives

There are conflicting data concerning the prognostic significance of syncope in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to investigate the impact of syncope on clinical outcomes of acute PE, and determine the clinical phenotypes of PE patients with syncope and their correlation with prognosis.

Methods

In the ongoing, national, multicenter, registry study, the China pUlmonary thromboembolism REgistry Study (CURES) enrolling consecutive patients with acute PE, patients with and without syncope were investigated. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using nine variables relevant to syncope and PE, including age, sex, body mass index, history of cardiovascular disease, recent surgery or trauma, malignancy, pulse, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate. Patient classification was performed using cluster analysis based on the PCA-transformed data. The clinical presentation, disease severity and outcomes were compared among the phenotypes.

Results

In 7,438 patients with acute PE, 777 (10.4%) had syncope, with younger age, more females and higher body mass index. Patients with syncope had higher frequency of precordial pain, palpitation, and elevated cardiac biomarkers, as well as higher D-Dimer level. In the syncope group, more patients had right ventricular/left ventricular ratio &gt; 0.9 in ultrasonic cardiogram and these patients had higher estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure compared with patients without syncope. As the initial antithrombotic treatment, more patients with syncope received systemic thrombolysis. Despite a higher prevalence of hemodynamic instability (OR 7.626, 95% CI 2.960–19.644, P &lt; 0.001), syncope did not increase in-hospital death. Principal component analysis revealed that four independent components accounted for 60.3% of variance. PE patients with syncope were classified into four phenotypes, in which patients with high pulse and respiratory rate had markedly higher all-cause mortality during admission.

Conclusion

Syncope was associated with hemodynamic instability and more application of thrombolysis, without increasing in-hospital deaths. Different clinical phenotypes existed in PE patients with syncope, which might be caused by various mechanisms and thus correlated with clinical outcomes.

A New Index for the Prediction of 30-Day Mortality in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism: The Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Score (PEMS)

Our aim was to analyze possibility of combination of basic clinical and radiological signs to predict 30-day mortality after acute pulmonary embolism (PE). We included 486 patients. Age, gender, simplified pulmonary embolism index (sPESI), pH, troponin, N-terminal natriuretic peptide, minimal systolic and diastolic blood pressure, O2 saturation, syncope, need for vasopressors, thrombotic obstruction, vessel diameter, short axis ratio right ventricle/left ventricle, and contrast medium reflux into the inferior vena cava (IVC) were analyzed. A backward algorithm in a logistic regression model was used to identify relevant risk factors. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified that sPESI, pH, minimal diastolic blood pressure, IVC reflux, and need for vasopressors influenced 30-day mortality. A score for mortality prediction was constructed (the Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Score): sPESI >2 points (1 point), pH <7.35 (1 point), minimal diastolic blood pressure <45 mm Hg (1 point), IVC reflux (1 point), and need for vasopressors (2 points). Patients with >3 points showed higher 30-day mortality (sensitivity: 84.9%, specificity: 83.0%, positive predictive value: 51.8%, negative predictive value: 96.2%). The net reclassification improvement compared with the sPESI was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.73-1.15). In conclusion, a new score can predict 30-day mortality in patients with PE and is more sensitive than sPESI.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Syncope

Syncope and presyncope lead to well over one million emergency room visits in the United States each year. Elucidating the cause of syncope or presyncope, which are grouped together given similar etiologies and outcomes, can be exceedingly difficult given the diverse etiologies. This becomes more challenging as some causes, such as vasovagal syncope, are relatively innocuous while others, such as cardiac-related syncope, carry a significant increased risk of death. While the mainstay of syncope and presyncope assessment is a detailed history and physical examination, imaging can play a role in certain situations. In patients where a cardiovascular etiology is suspected based on the appropriate history, physical examination, and ECG findings, resting transthoracic echocardiography is usually considered appropriate for the initial imaging. While no imaging studies are considered usually appropriate when there is a low probability of cardiac or neurologic pathology, chest radiography may be appropriate in certain clinical situations. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

A Floating Right Atrial and Ventricular Thrombus in a Patient with Syncope

Here, we describe a rare echocardiographic finding of a floating right heart thrombus in an elderly woman who presented with an unexplained syncope. Our case demonstrates the pivotal role of echocardiography in the workup of patients admitted with syncope.

Syncope in pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of syncope or collapse in pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. We examined the frequency with which syncope or collapse (presyncope) occurred alone or with other symptoms and signs in an unselected series of 224 patients presenting to a district general hospital with PE between September 2012 and March 2016. Confirmation of PE was by CT pulmonary angiogram in each case.

RESULTS

Our cohort of 224 patients comprised 97 men and 127 women, average age 66 years with age range of 21-94 years. Syncope or collapse was one of several symptoms and signs that led to a diagnosis of PE in 22 patients (9.8%) but was never the sole presenting feature. In descending order, these other clinical features were hypoxaemia (17 patients), dyspnoea (12), chest pain (9), tachycardia (7) and tachypnoea (7). ECG abnormalities reported to occur more commonly in PE were found in 13/17 patients for whom ECGs were available. Patients with PE presenting with syncope or collapse were judged to have a large clot load in 15/22 (68%) cases.

CONCLUSION

Syncope was a frequent presenting symptom in our study of 224 consecutive patients with PE but was never the sole clinical feature. It would be difficult to justify routine testing for PE in patients presenting only with syncope or collapse.

The Prognostic Value of Syncope on Mortality in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Syncope is a presenting symptom in 10% to 20% of patients with pulmonary embolism. We perform a meta-analysis to clarify the prognostic value of syncope on short-term mortality in pulmonary embolism patients and its association with hemodynamic instability.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched up until January 7, 2020. Studies reporting inhospital or 30-day mortality of adults with pulmonary embolism with and without syncope were included. Quality of included studies was evaluated with the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Meta-analysis was conducted to derive pooled odds ratios (ORs) and risk differences for the relation of syncope with mortality and hemodynamic instability. To study the influence of hemodynamic instability on the association between syncope and mortality, meta-regression was performed.

RESULTS

Search and selection resulted in 26 studies, of which 20 were pooled, involving 9,419 of 335,120 patients (3%) with syncope. Syncope was associated with higher mortality (OR 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 2.90; I2 88%; risk difference 4% [95% CI 1% to 8%]) and higher prevalence of hemodynamic instability (OR 4.36; 95% CI 2.27 to 8.37; I2 93%; risk difference 12% [95% CI 7% to 18%]). OR for mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism with syncope versus without it was higher in the presence of a larger difference in hemodynamic instability between groups (coefficient 0.05; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09).

CONCLUSION

The association between syncope and short-term mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism is explained by a difference in hemodynamic instability. This emphasizes the importance of risk stratification by hemodynamic status in pulmonary embolism patients with and without syncope.

Sudden unresponsive patient with normal vital signs: what is going on?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the differential diagnosis and diagnostic approach of sudden unresponsiveness with normal vital signs in various settings, including the ICU.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sudden unresponsiveness may be either transient or persistent, and may result from primary brain diseases or nonstructural systemic conditions. Life-threatening causes should always be discriminated from those more benign. Regional epidemiology, for example regarding intoxications, and evolving therapeutic management, for example for ischemic stroke, should always be taken into account for optimal opportunity for rapid diagnosis and best management.

SUMMARY

Sudden unresponsiveness with normal vital signs should trigger immediate and focused diagnostic evaluation to find or exclude those conditions requiring urgent, and possibly life-saving, management.

Presyncope Is Associated with Intensive Care Unit Admission in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism

INTRODUCTION

Syncope is common among emergency department (ED) patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and indicates a higher acuity and worse prognosis than in patients without syncope. Whether presyncope carries the same prognostic implications has not been established. We compared incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in three groups of ED PE patients: those with presyncope; syncope; and neither.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all adults with acute, objectively confirmed PE in 21 community EDs from January 2013-April 2015. We combined electronic health record extraction with manual chart abstraction. We used chi-square test for univariate comparisons and performed multivariate analysis to evaluate associations between presyncope or syncope and ICU admission from the ED, reported as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Among 2996 PE patients, 82 (2.7%) had presyncope and 109 (3.6%) had syncope. ICU admission was similar between groups (presyncope 18.3% vs syncope 25.7%) and different than their non-syncope counterparts (either 22.5% vs neither 4.7%; p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, both presyncope and syncope were independently associated with ICU admission, controlling for demographics, higher-risk PE Severity Index (PESI) class, ventilatory support, proximal clot location, and submassive and massive PE classification: presyncope, aOR 2.79 (95% CI, 1.40, 5.56); syncope, aOR 4.44 (95% CI 2.52, 7.80). These associations were only minimally affected when excluding massive PE from the model. There was no significant interaction between either syncope or presyncope and PESI, submassive or massive classification in predicting ICU admission.

CONCLUSION

Presyncope appears to carry similar strength of association with ICU admission as syncope in ED patients with acute PE. If this is confirmed, clinicians evaluating patients with acute PE may benefit from including presyncope in their calculus of risk assessment and site-of-care decision-making.

Significance of Syncope at Presentation among Patients With Pulmonary Emboli

Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary emboli (PE) present a challenging clinical problem. Although syncope has been suggested as a marker for adverse outcomes in these patients, data remain scarce. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of intermediate risk PE patients presenting with syncope. We performed a retrospective cohort study comprised of consecutive, normotensive, PE patients, with evidence of right ventricular involvement. The primary outcome of major adverse clinical events included either one or a combination of mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic instability and need for inotropic support, reperfusion therapy, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included each of the above individual components including major bleeding and renal failure. Overall, 212 patients were evaluated, 40 (19%) presented with syncope, and had a higher prevalence of major adverse clinical events (29% vs 9.4%, p = 0.003), as well as each of the individual secondary end points: mechanical ventilation (10% vs 1.8%, p = 0.026), hemodynamic instability (18% vs 2.9%, p = 0.02), increased need of inotropic support (10% vs 0.6%, p = 0.005), and bleeding (15% vs 2.4%, p = 0.004). The prevalence of in-hospital mortality was very low (0.5%) with no significant difference between those with and without syncope. There was no significant difference in the need for reperfusion therapy. Upon multivariable analysis, syncope was found to be an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes (odds ratio 3.8, confidence interval 1.48 to 9.76, p = 0.005). In conclusion, in intermediate-risk PE patients with right ventricular involvement, the presence of syncope is associated with a more complicated in-hospital course.

Prevalence and Predictors of Pulmonary Embolism in Hospitalized Patients with Syncope

OBJECTIVES

Approximately one in six patients hospitalized with syncope have pulmonary embolism (PE), according to the PE in Syncope Italian Trial study. Subsequent studies using administrative data have reported a PE prevalence of <3%. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of PE in hospitalized patients with syncope.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who were hospitalized in the MedStar Washington Hospital Center between May 1, 2015 and June 30, 2017 with deep venous thrombosis, PE, and syncope. Only patients who presented to the emergency department with syncope were included in the final analysis. PE was diagnosed by either positive computed tomographic angiography or a high-probability ventilation-perfusion scan. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess the associations between clinical variables and the diagnosis of PE in patients with syncope.

RESULTS

Of the 408 patients hospitalized with syncope (mean age, 67.5 years; 51% men [N = 208]), 25 (6%) had a diagnosis of PE. Elevated troponin levels (odds ratio 6.6, 95% confidence interval 1.9-22.9) and a dilated right ventricle on echocardiogram (odds ratio 6.9, 95% confidence interval 2.0-23.6) were independently associated with the diagnosis of PE. Age, active cancer, and history of deep venous thrombosis were not associated with the diagnosis of PE.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of PE in this study is approximately one-third of the reported prevalence in the PE in Syncope Italian Trial study and almost three times the value reported in administrative data-based studies. PE should be suspected in patients with syncope and elevated troponin levels or a dilated right ventricle on echocardiogram.

Thrombolysis in hemodynamically unstable patients: still underused: a review based on multicenter prospective registries on acute pulmonary embolism

Hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a complex and life-threatening event with a highly variable course and poor prognosis in the short-term period. Despite an immediate reperfusion treatment is recommended in these patients, previous investigations have reported a lower use of systemic thrombolysis (ST). The aim of the present review is to assess and describe the real use of ST in hemodynamically unstable patients with acute PE enrolled in prospective-multicenter registries between the 1990 and 2018. Over that period, 1216 articles were identified in Pubmed. After excluding the duplicates obtained using the different searching MeSH (n = 703), 513 articles were screened and then excluded for not meeting inclusion criteria due the article type, design of the study or no English language. As result, 13 articles were assessed for eligibility and carefully reviewed. Finally, five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The identified study registries enrolled prospectively 41364 consecutive patients with acute PE between the 1993 and the 2016. Among these, 2168 (5.2%) were hemodynamically unstable at presentation. ST was administered in 29.7% (n = 645) of patients while catheter-direct treatment (CDT) was used only in 1.4% (n = 32) of cases. Conversely, surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) was adopted as reperfusion treatment in 39 patients (1.7%). Intriguingly, the 68% of patients not received a reperfusion treatment despite they were hemodynamically unstable at admission. Despite the internationals guidelines recommendations, a prompt reperfusion is performed only in one on three hemodynamically unstable patients with acute PE.

Pearls and Myths in the Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Significant improvement has been achieved in diagnostic accuracy, validation of probability scores, and standardized treatment algorithms for patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. These developments have provided the tools for a safe and cost-effective management for most of these patients. In our experience, however, the presence of medical myths and ongoing controversies seem to hinder the implementation of these tools in everyday clinical practice. This review provides a selection of such dilemmas and controversies and discusses the published evidence beyond them. By doing so, we try to overcome these dilemmas and suggest pragmatic approaches guided by the available evidence and current guidelines.

Syncope in haemodynamically stable and unstable patients with acute pulmonary embolism - Results of the German nationwide inpatient sample

Syncope in pulmonary embolism (PE) could be the first sign of haemodynamic compromise. We aimed to investigate pathomechanisms of syncope and its impact on mortality. For this study, patients (aged ≥ 18years) were selected by screening the German nationwide inpatient sample for PE and stratified included patients by syncope (2011–2014). We analysed predictors of syncope in haemodynamically stable PE. Impact of syncope on in-hospital mortality in haemodynamically stable and unstable PE and benefit of systemic thrombolysis in haemodynamically stable PE with syncope (PE + Syncope) were analyzed. The German nationwide inpatient sample comprised 293,640 (84.9%) haemodynamically stable and 52,249 (15.1%) unstable PE patients; among them 2.3% had syncope. Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) was a key predictor for syncope. In-hospital mortality-rate was lower in haemodynamically stable (6.4% vs. 7.6%, P < 0.001) and unstable PE + Syncope than in PE−Syncope (48.4% vs. 55.5%, P < 0.001) with reduced risk for in-hospital death in stable (OR 0.68 (95%CI 0.61–0.75), P < 0.001) and unstable (OR 0.69 (95% CI 0.62–0.78), P < 0.001) inpatients independent of age and sex. Haemodynamically stable PE + Syncope patients were more often treated with systemic thrombolysis (3.1% vs. 2.1%, P < 0.001). Systemic thrombolysis was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in haemodynamically stable PE + Syncope (1.9% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.004) independently of age, RVD and tachycardia (OR 0.30 (95%CI 0.11–0.82), P = 0.019). In conclusion, in-hospital mortality was 6.4% in haemodynamically stable PE + Syncope. Haemodynamically stable PE + Syncope patients were more often treated with systemic thrombolysis and showed a trend to improved survial.