Infective endocarditis in patients with solid organ transplantation. A nationwide descriptive study

Infective endocarditis in HIV-infected patients. Analysis of a national cohort

BACKGROUND

There is limited recent evidence about infective endocarditis (IE) in HIV-infected patients. Our aim was to compare IE according to HIV infection presence.

METHODS

Consecutive inclusion of IE patients at 46 Spanish hospitals between 2008 and 2021.

RESULTS

From 5667 patients, 99 were HIV-infected (1·7%; 50 intravenous drugs users). Compared to patients without HIV, HIV-infected patients were more frequently male (84% vs. 67%), had younger median age (46 vs. 69 years), and less comorbidities, except liver disease (52% vs. 9%) and intravenous drug use (51% vs. 1%). They had more common tricuspid location (36% vs. 5%) and community-acquired IE (82% vs. 63%), vascular (29% vs. 17%) and cutaneous (22% vs. 7%) foci of infection, and Staphylococcus aureus aetiology (46% vs. 22%). Vegetations (84% vs. 72%), vascular phenomena (17% vs. 9%), splenomegaly (30% vs. 11%), and embolisation (41% vs 21%) were also more common. Surgical indication and surgery were less frequent in HIV-infected patients (54% vs 67%, 28% vs 47%, respectively). Median CD4 count in HIV-infected patients was 318 cells/mm3. In-hospital mortality (23% vs. 26%) and one-year mortality (25% vs. 32%) were similar in both groups. HIV infection was not independently associated with in-hospital (odds ratio 1·1, 95% CI 0·6-1·9) nor one-year mortality (hazard ratio 0·8, 95% CI 0·4-1·3).

CONCLUSIONS

In the combined antiretroviral therapy era, less than 2% of IE patients have HIV infection. HIV-infected patients have a different clinical profile than those without HIV, but the presence of HIV does not seem to impact on IE prognosis.

Therapeutic Myths in Solid Organ Transplantation Infectious Diseases

Infection management in solid organ transplantation poses unique challenges, with a diverse array of potential pathogens and associated antimicrobial therapies. With limited high-quality randomized clinical trials to direct optimal care, therapeutic "myths" may propagate and contribute to suboptimal or excessive antimicrobial use. We discuss 6 therapeutic myths with particular relevance to solid organ transplantation and provide recommendations for infectious diseases clinicians involved in the care of this high-risk population.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for perioperative management of infective endocarditis after COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a case report

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare cardiovascular complication in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). IE after COVID-19 can also be complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, the guidelines for the treatment of such cases are not clear. Here, we report a case of perioperative management of post-COVID-19 IE with ARDS using veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO).

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 40-year-old woman who was admitted on day 18 of COVID-19 onset and was administered oxygen therapy, remdesivir, and dexamethasone. The patient's condition improved; however, on day 24 of hospitalization, the patient developed hypoxemia and was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to respiratory failure. Blood culture revealed Corynebacterium striatum, and transesophageal echocardiography revealed vegetation on the aortic and mitral valves. Valve destruction was mild, and the cause of respiratory failure was thought to be ARDS. Despite continued antimicrobial therapy, ARDS did not improve the patient's condition, and valve destruction progressed; therefore, surgical treatment was scheduled on day 13 of ICU admission. After preoperative consultation with the team, a decision was made to initiate V-V ECMO after the patient was weaned from CPB, with concerns about further worsening of her respiratory status after surgery. The patient returned to the ICU with transition to V-V ECMO, and her circulation remained stable. The patient was weaned off V-V ECMO on postoperative day 33 and discharged from the ICU on postoperative day 47.

CONCLUSIONS

ARDS may occur in patients with IE after COVID-19. Owing to concerns about further exacerbation of pulmonary damage, the timing of surgery should be comprehensively considered. Preoperatively, clinicians should discuss perioperative ECMO introduction and configuration.

Prevalence and prognostic impact of stroke in a national cohort of infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a common complication of infective endocarditis (IE). Our aim was to describe the prevalence and prognostic impact of stroke in a national cohort of IE.

METHODS

Consecutive inclusion at 46 Spanish hospitals between 2008 and 2021.

RESULTS

Out of 5667 IE cases, 1125 had acute stroke (19.8%): 818 ischemic strokes (811 cardioembolic strokes (193 with hemorrhagic transformation), 4 transient ischemic attacks, 3 lacunar infarctions), 127 intracranial hemorrhages, and 27 other neurological complications (cerebral abscesses, encephalitis, and meningitis). Compared to patients without stroke, those with stroke had a similar mean age (69 years) but were more frequently female (68.2% vs 63.7%, p = 0.04) and had a higher incidence of intracardiac complications (35% vs 30%, p = 0.01), surgical indication (69.9% vs 65.9%, p = 0.001), in-hospital mortality (40.9% vs 22.0%, p < 0.001), and 1-year mortality (46.2% vs 27.9%, p < 0.001). The following variables were independently associated with stroke: mitral location (odds ratio (OR) = 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34-1.8, p < 0.001), vascular phenomenon (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 2.4-3.6, p = 0.0001), acute renal failure (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0-1.4, p = 0.021), septic shock (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1-1.6, p = 0.007), sepsis (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1-1.6, p = 0.005), surgery indicated but not performed (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.7, p < 0.001), community-acquired IE (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1-1.4, p = 0.017), and peripheral embolization (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.4-1.9, p < 0.001). Stroke was an independent predictor of in-hospital (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.78-2.51, p < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.6-2.5).

CONCLUSION

One-fifth of patients with IE have concomitant stroke. Stroke is associated with mortality.

The interplay among a dental procedure, infective endocarditis, and an acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

This case report highlights the rare association among a dental procedure, infective endocarditis, and an acute ischemic stroke.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 54-year-old woman who experienced an acute ischemic stroke 5 weeks after a tooth extraction is described. The initial symptoms of this patient included mild to moderate word-finding difficulty and right facial droop. Computed tomographic angiography revealed a left M1 segment middle cerebral artery occlusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale, 0) with reconstitution of the distal middle cerebral branches through arterial collaterals. After initial administration of tissue plasminogen activator, endovascular thrombectomy was successfully performed with thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 3 (complete) recanalization. After the procedure, the patient showed improvement in language and neurologic deficits. Imaging showed multifocal, bilateral, cortical, and deep brain hemorrhages. Blood cultures grew Streptococcus mitis, ultimately leading to the diagnosis of endocarditis. Echocardiographic imaging revealed moderate to severe aortic insufficiency, a mitral valve vegetation, and mild mitral valve regurgitation. After evaluation by the cardiothoracic surgery team, the patient was discharged with intravenous antibiotics and short-term outpatient follow-up with the cardiothoracic surgery team.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Dental procedures, although generally safe, can introduce oral bacteria into the bloodstream, leading to bacterial seeding of cardiac valves and subsequent infective endocarditis. Recognizing infective endocarditis subsequent to a dental procedure, including a tooth extraction, as a potential cause of an acute ischemic stroke is vital so that prompt treatment can be initiated.

Contemporary Outcomes and Predictors of Inpatient Mortality for Infective Endocarditis Occurring in Renal Transplant Recipients in the United States

Renal transplant (RT) recipients are susceptible to infections because of immunosuppression. The literature regarding the epidemiology and outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE) in RT recipients is limited. We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample in the United States to study IE in RT and identify risk factors for inpatient mortality and IE development in RT patients. All patients ≥18 years who had IE with and without RT between 2007 and 2019 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. The demographics, co-morbidities, length of stay, hospital costs, and mortality of IE patients with RT were compared with IE patients without RT. Predictors of inpatient mortality for RT recipients with IE were analyzed. Between 2007 and 2019, there were 777,245 hospitalizations for IE, of which 3,782 had RT. The IE in RT cohort was younger than the general IE population and had higher proportions of males, non-White races, and Hispanic ethnicity, and higher burden of co-morbidities, but similar inpatient mortality rates. On multivariate analysis, Staphylococcal IE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 4.3, p = 0.015), stroke (aOR 6.4, 95% CI 2.7 to 15.3, p <0.001), anemia (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.0, p = 0.004), and shock (aOR 6.3, 95% CI 3.3 to 11.9, p <0.001) were associated with greater inpatient mortality, whereas Streptococcal endocarditis (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9, p = 0.038) was associated with lower inpatient mortality. In conclusion, RT patients with IE were younger and had more severe co-morbidities compared with IE patients without RT. Staphylococcal IE, presence of shock and stroke worsened the prognosis in these patients.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) has experienced enormous changes in recent decades [...].

Current Views on Infective Endocarditis: Changing Epidemiology, Improving Diagnostic Tools and Centering the Patient for Up-to-Date Management

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease, sometimes with longstanding sequels among surviving patients. The population at high risk of IE is represented by patients with underlying structural heart disease and/or intravascular prosthetic material. Taking into account the increasing number of intravascular and intracardiac procedures associated with device implantation, the number of patients at risk is growing too. If bacteremia develops, infected vegetation on the native/prosthetic valve or any intracardiac/intravascular device may occur as the final result of invading microorganisms/host immune system interaction. In the case of IE suspicion, all efforts must be focused on the diagnosis as IE can spread to almost any organ in the body. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of IE might be difficult and require a combination of clinical examination, microbiological assessment and echocardiographic evaluation. There is a need of novel microbiological and imaging techniques, especially in cases of blood culture-negative. In the last few years, the management of IE has changed. A multidisciplinary care team, including experts in infectious diseases, cardiology and cardiac surgery, namely, the Endocarditis Team, is highly recommended by the current guidelines.

Strengths and limitations of patient registries in infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious albeit relatively infrequent disease. Given the paucity of cases, particularly in non-referral centres, patient registries have progressively gained relevance to inform about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and natural history of IE in the last two decades. Although they have become key to advancing knowledge of IE, registries also have shortcomings that lead to relevant consequences that are often overlooked.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to discuss the strengths and limitations of registries in IE.

SOURCES

We conducted a PubMed search of relevant articles published between January 2000 and June 2022.

CONTENT

The backbone of the contemporary knowledge on IE has been built upon data collected in prospective registries, which has allowed us to collect data on relatively unknown aspects of the disease, identify knowledge gaps, and generate new hypotheses, serving as platforms for further research endeavours. Well-exploited registries can provide key information on how IE is distributed across populations and how it differentially impacts patients and subgroups. However, registries face several difficulties, such as the definition of IE, which includes subjective variables and changes over time. Other limitations include difficulty achieving a comprehensive collection of cases (which depends on both project funding and information systems), over-representation of the centres that created the registry, lack of inclusion of variables to assess endpoints that are relevant to patients in terms of quality of life and prognosis, and ethical issues.

IMPLICATIONS

The review of the advantages and disadvantages of registries aims to improve the quality of the information collected, the viability of the registry itself, and the ability to answer questions that are relevant to both researchers and patients.

Infective endocarditis in solid organ transplant: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infective endocarditis remains an uncommon disease with significant morbidity and mortality. In the last two decades, progress has been made describing the unique aspects of infective endocarditis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Incidence of infective endocarditis in SOT is higher when compared with the general population. End-stage organ dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, older age, and prior intravenous lines have been identified as risk factors predisposing to infective endocarditis in SOT. Staphylococci and enterococci represent the most frequently isolated pathogens, whereas fungi are rarely isolated. Median time from transplantation to diagnosis ranges from 33 to 66 months. Nosocomial acquisition and mural endocarditis are more common in SOT recipients with infective endocarditis. Procurement of organs from patients with infective endocarditis might be well tolerated so long as close monitoring and targeted antibiotics are given. Selected patients might benefit from heart transplantation as definitive or salvage therapy for infective endocarditis. Outcomes of infective endocarditis in SOT recipients compared with the general population might be similar; however, patient survival and graft function are reduced when recipients suffer from infective endocarditis.

SUMMARY

Infective endocarditis although rare can affect donors and recipients involved in the SOT process. Recognition of the unique characteristics in the presentation, prevention, medical, and surgical therapy of this disease is essential in order to minimize adverse outcomes.

In-hospital mortality and length of stay among patients with infective endocarditis and solid organ transplant: A study from National Inpatient Sample 2016-2019

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but serious complication following a Solid Organ Transplant (SOT). Due to the lack of sufficient studies, we aimed to compare in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) of patients primarily admitted for IE (index or principal hospitalization) with history of SOT, including the subgroup of heart or lung transplant (HLT), to those without a history of SOT (non-SOT) or HLT (non-HLT). We used the 2016–2019 National Inpatient Sample, the largest all-payer inpatient hospital data from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), including patients 18 years or older with IE, as a principal diagnosis for hospitalization. From 2016 to 2019, there were 56,330 principal or index hospitalizations for IE. Among them, 0.6 % (n = 327) were SOT recipients, 0.1% (n = 68) were HLT recipients, and 41.4% were females. The mean age was 51.9 ± 19.2 years. Compared to non-SOT controls, SOT recipients were older (mean age 59.3 vs. 51.8 years; P = 0.002) and had higher Charlson-comorbidity-index (CCI) of 3 or more (87.7% vs. 33.2%; p < 0.001). SOT status was not statistically significant for a higher or lower odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2, 2.4; p = 0.60) or increased or decreased LOS (coefficient: -0.1, 95% CI: -0.4, 0.1; p = 0.23) among index IE hospitalizations after controlling for age, sex, race, hospital-region, hospital-teaching status, income, insurance status, and CCI. HLT status was also not associated with higher or lower odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 13.1; p = 0.77) or increased or decreased LOS (coefficient: -0.1, 95% CI: -0.3, 0.5; p = 0.59). From 2016 to 2019, the rate of index IE hospitalization trends from 37.8 to 41.4 per 100,000 overall hospitalizations (p = 0.001). We found the rate of index IE hospitalizations increasing with time. Among index IE hospitalizations, SOT, including a subgroup of HLT recipients, have similar in-hospital mortality and LOS compared to non-SOT or non-HLT groups. We need a larger sample size to comment on outcomes of IE hospitalizations with the HLT subgroup.

Endocarditis in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

Infective Endocarditis (IE) is associated with significant mortality. Interestingly, IE in patients with liver transplantation has not been adequately described. The aim of this review was to systematically review all published cases of IE in liver transplant recipients and describe their epidemiology, microbiology, clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes. A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library (through 2 January 2021) for studies providing epidemiological, clinical, microbiological, treatment data and outcomes of IE in liver transplant recipients was conducted. A total of 39 studies, containing data for 62 patients, were included in the analysis. The most common causative pathogens were gram-positive microorganisms in 69.4%, fungi in 25.8%, and gram-negative microorganisms in 9.7% of cases, while in 9.3% IE was culture-negative. The aortic valve was the most commonly infected valve followed by mitral, tricuspid and the pulmonary valve. Aminoglycosides, vancomycin and aminopenicillins were the most commonly used antimicrobials, and surgical management was performed in half of the cases. Clinical cure was noted in 57.4%, while overall mortality was 43.5%. To conclude, this systematic review thoroughly describes IE in liver transplant recipients and provides information on epidemiology, clinical presentation, treatment and outcomes.