1
|
Ruiz-Esteves KN, Shank KR, Deutsch AJ, Gunturi A, Chamorro-Pareja N, Colling CA, Zubiri L, Perlman K, Ouyang T, Villani AC, Florez JC, Gusev A, Reynolds KL, Miller KK, Udler MS, Sise ME, Rengarajan M. Identification of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Diabetes. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:1409-1416. [PMID: 39207773 PMCID: PMC11362970 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.3104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Importance Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer care; however, accompanying immune-related adverse events (irAEs) confer substantial morbidity and occasional mortality. Life-threatening irAEs may require permanent cessation of ICI, even in patients with positive tumor response. Therefore, it is imperative to comprehensively define the spectrum of irAEs to aid individualized decision-making around the initiation of ICI therapy. Objective To define incidence, risk factors, and clinical spectrum of an irreversible and life-threatening irAE: ICI-induced diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study, conducted at an academic integrated health care system examined 14 328 adult patients treated with ICIs, including 64 patients who developed ICI-induced diabetes, from July 2010 to January 2022. The data were analyzed from 2022 to 2023. Cases of ICI-induced diabetes were manually confirmed; detailed clinical phenotyping was performed at diagnosis and 1-year follow-up. For 862 patients, genotyping data were available, and polygenic risk for type 1 diabetes was determined. Main Outcomes and Measures For ICI-induced diabetes cases and controls, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, tumor category, and ICI category were compared. Among ICI-induced diabetes cases, markers of glycemic physiology were examined at diagnosis and 1-year follow-up. For patients with available genotyping, a published type 1 diabetes polygenic score (T1D GRS2) was calculated. Results Of 14 328 participants, 6571 (45.9%) were women, and the median (range) age was 66 (8-106) years. The prevalence of ICI-induced diabetes among ICI-treated patients was 0.45% (64 of 14 328), with an incidence of 124.8 per 100 000 person-years. Preexisting type 2 diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 5.91; 95% CI, 3.34-10.45) and treatment with combination ICI (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.44-4.59) were significant clinical risk factors of ICI-induced diabetes. T1D GRS2 was associated with ICI-induced diabetes risk, with an OR of 4.4 (95% CI, 1.8-10.5) for patients in the top decile of T1D GRS2, demonstrating a genetic association between spontaneous autoimmunity and irAEs. Patients with ICI-induced diabetes were in 3 distinct phenotypic categories based on autoantibodies and residual pancreatic function, with varying severity of initial presentation. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this analysis of 14 328 ICI-treated patients followed up from ICI initiation determined the incidence, risk factors and clinical spectrum of ICI-induced diabetes. Widespread implementation of this approach across organ-specific irAEs may enhance diagnosis and management of these conditions, and this becomes especially pertinent as ICI treatment rapidly expands to treat a wide spectrum of cancers and is used at earlier stages of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina N. Ruiz-Esteves
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Kaitlyn R. Shank
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston
| | - Aaron J. Deutsch
- Department of Medicine and Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alekhya Gunturi
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston
| | - Natalia Chamorro-Pareja
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Caitlin A. Colling
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Leyre Zubiri
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | | | - Tianqi Ouyang
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Alexandra-Chloé Villani
- Center for Cancer Research, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jose C. Florez
- Department of Medicine and Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Kerry L. Reynolds
- Department of Medicine, Mass General Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Karen K. Miller
- Neuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Miriam S. Udler
- Department of Medicine and Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meghan E. Sise
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Michelle Rengarajan
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdel-Wahab N, Suarez-Almazor ME. Rheumatic adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer immunotherapy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2024; 20:873-893. [PMID: 38400840 PMCID: PMC11449381 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2024.2323966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer treatment has marked a transformative era, albeit tempered by immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including those impacting the musculoskeletal system. The lack of precise epidemiologic data on rheumatic irAEs is attributed to factors such as potential underrecognition, underreporting in clinical trials, and the tendency to overlook manifestations without immediate life-threatening implications, further complicating the determination of accurate incidence rates, while the complete understanding of the mechanisms driving rheumatic irAEs remains elusive. AREAS COVERED This literature review comprehensively examines rheumatic irAEs in cancer patients undergoing ICI therapy, encompassing epidemiology, risk factors, mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and current management guidance for prevalent conditions such as inflammatory arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and myositis. Less frequent rheumatic and musculoskeletal irAEs are also explored, alongside insights into ongoing clinical trials testing therapeutic and preventive strategies for irAEs. A thorough literature search on Medline and the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Database was conducted up to October 2023 to compile relevant information. EXPERT OPINION In light of the evolving landscape of cancer immunotherapy, there is a compelling need for prospective longitudinal studies to enhance understanding and inform clinical management strategies for rheumatic irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noha Abdel-Wahab
- Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of General Internal Medicine; and Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Assiut University Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Maria E Suarez-Almazor
- Department of Health Services Research; and Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ceccarelli F, Natalucci F, Picciariello L, Cirillo A, Olivieri G, Veroli M, Pisegna S, Ciancarella C, Gelibter A, Picone V, Santini D, Botticelli A, Conti F. Antinuclear antibodies may predict the development of immune-related adverse events in asymptomatic patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: results from a single-center cohort. Clin Exp Med 2024; 24:72. [PMID: 38598028 PMCID: PMC11006777 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01317-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
We aim at investigating the association between subclinical autoimmunity and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a cohort of patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors for solid metastatic cancer. In the context of an oncology/rheumatology outpatient clinic, we evaluated patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Before treatment, each patient underwent a physical evaluation and a blood sample to identify the presence of a set of autoantibodies. Indeed, all the patients were followed during treatment to identify irAEs and to assess the association with autoantibodies. Fifty-one patients (M/F 16/35; median age 70 years, IQR 16.5) were evaluated; 34.8% of patients showed ANA positivity, 6.5% ENA positivity (anti-SSA), 4.3% Ratest positivity, and 2.1% (one patient) ACPA positivity. During a median period of 21 months (IQR 38.75), 39.2% of patients developed irAEs. Musculo-skeletal manifestations, in particular arthritis, were the most frequent. We found a significant association between the positivity for ANA and the development of irAES (p = 0.03, RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.03-3.92). Furthermore, the progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients developing irAEs compared to those who are not experiencing these events (p = 0.007). This study underlines the potential role of ANA positivity as a predictive biomarker for the development of irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fulvia Ceccarelli
- Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Arthritis Center, Rheumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Natalucci
- Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Arthritis Center, Rheumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Licia Picciariello
- Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Arthritis Center, Rheumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio Cirillo
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulio Olivieri
- Research Unit of Clinical Immunology and Vaccinology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- PhD Program in Immunology, Molecular Medicine and Applied Biotechnology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Veroli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Pisegna
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Ciancarella
- Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Arthritis Center, Rheumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alain Gelibter
- Division of Medical Oncology B, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picone
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Conti
- Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Arthritis Center, Rheumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhodapkar KM, Duffy A, Dhodapkar MV. Role of B cells in immune-related adverse events following checkpoint blockade. Immunol Rev 2023; 318:89-95. [PMID: 37421187 PMCID: PMC10530150 DOI: 10.1111/imr.13238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
Blockade of immune checkpoints has transformed the therapy of several cancers. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have emerged as a major challenge limiting the clinical application of this approach. B cells are recognized as major players in the pathogenesis of human autoimmunity and have been successfully targeted to treat these disorders. While T cells have been extensively studied as therapeutic targets of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), these checkpoints also impact B cell tolerance. Blockade of immune checkpoints in the clinic is associated with distinct changes in the B cell compartment that correlate with the development of irAEs. In this review, we focus on the possible role of humoral immunity, specifically human B cell subsets and autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of ICB-induced irAEs. There remains an unmet need to better understand the T:B cell cross talk underlying the activation of pathogenic B cells and the development of ICB-induced irAEs. Such studies may identify new targets or approaches to prevent or treat irAEs and improve the application of ICB therapy in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita M. Dhodapkar
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Alyssa Duffy
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Madhav V. Dhodapkar
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rheumatic Immune-Related Adverse Events due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors—A 2023 Update. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24065643. [PMID: 36982715 PMCID: PMC10051463 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
With the aging of the population, malignancies are becoming common complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly in elderly patients. Such malignancies often interfere with RA treatment. Among several therapeutic agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) which antagonize immunological brakes on T lymphocytes have emerged as a promising treatment option for a variety of malignancies. In parallel, evidence has accumulated that ICIs are associated with numerous immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as hypophysitis, myocarditis, pneumonitis, and colitis. Moreover, ICIs not only exacerbate pre-existing autoimmune diseases, but also cause de novo rheumatic disease–like symptoms, such as arthritis, myositis, and vasculitis, which are currently termed rheumatic irAEs. Rheumatic irAEs differ from classical rheumatic diseases in multiple aspects, and treatment should be individualized based on the severity. Close collaboration with oncologists is critical for preventing irreversible organ damage. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the mechanisms and management of rheumatic irAEs with focus on arthritis, myositis, and vasculitis. Based on these findings, potential therapeutic strategies against rheumatic irAEs are discussed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lazzari C, Yacoub MR, Campochiaro C, Bulotta A, Palumbo D, Ogliari FR, Dagna L, Marchesi S, Ponzoni M, Gregorc V. Case report: Successful use of mepolizumab for immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced hypereosinophilic syndrome in two patients with solid malignancies. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1079034. [PMID: 36776300 PMCID: PMC9911301 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1079034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) represents a group of blood disorders characterized by an absolute eosinophil count (AEC) > 1.5 × 103/μl in the peripheral blood, which eventually extravasate and cause organ damage. It can be primary or secondary to infections or tumors. The infiltration of eosinophils in tissue and organs is associated with different disorders and, in some cases, with life-threatening manifestations. Albeit the pathogenesis of HES in patients with solid tumo\rs is not yet clarified; recently, HES has also been described as an immune-related adverse event in patients with solid tumors receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Treatment of HES is still debated, especially in patients with concomitant solid tumors, and different drugs including imatinib, hydroxyurea, interferon-ɑ, glucocorticoids, and the monoclonal antibody targeting circulating IL-5 mepolizumab have been proposed according to the underlying cause and the severity of HES. Herein, we describe, for the first time, the successful use of mepolizumab for the treatment of immune checkpoint-induced HES in two patients with metastatic solid tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Lazzari
- Department of Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute Fondazione Piemontese per l'Oncologia-Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS) Candiolo, Torino, Italy,*Correspondence: Chiara Lazzari,
| | - Mona Rita Yacoub
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Corrado Campochiaro
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bulotta
- Department of Oncology, Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Diego Palumbo
- Department of Radiology, Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesca Rita Ogliari
- Department of Oncology, Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Dagna
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Marchesi
- Department of Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute Fondazione Piemontese per l'Oncologia-Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS) Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Maurilio Ponzoni
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy,Pathology Unit, Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Vanesa Gregorc
- Department of Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute Fondazione Piemontese per l'Oncologia-Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS) Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Taylor J, Gandhi A, Gray E, Zaenker P. Checkpoint inhibitor immune-related adverse events: A focused review on autoantibodies and B cells as biomarkers, advancements and future possibilities. Front Immunol 2023; 13:991433. [PMID: 36713389 PMCID: PMC9874109 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.991433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has evolved rapidly with unprecedented treatment benefits being obtained for cancer patients, including improved patient survival. However, over half of the patients experience immune related adverse events (irAEs) or toxicities, which can be fatal, affect the quality of life of patients and potentially cause treatment interruption or cessation. Complications from these toxicities can also cause long term irreversible organ damage and other chronic health conditions. Toxicities can occur in various organ systems, with common observations in the skin, rheumatologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine system and the lungs. These are not only challenging to manage but also difficult to detect during the early stages of treatment. Currently, no biomarker exists to predict which patients are likely to develop toxicities from ICI therapy and efforts to identify robust biomarkers are ongoing. B cells and antibodies against autologous antigens (autoantibodies) have shown promise and are emerging as markers to predict the development of irAEs in cancer patients. In this review, we discuss the interplay between ICIs and toxicities in cancer patients, insights into the underlying mechanisms of irAEs, and the involvement of the humoral immune response, particularly by B cells and autoantibodies in irAE development. We also provide an appraisal of the progress, key empirical results and advances in B cell and autoantibody research as biomarkers for predicting irAEs. We conclude the review by outlining the challenges and steps required for their potential clinical application in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Taylor
- Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia,School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia,*Correspondence: John Taylor,
| | - Aesha Gandhi
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Elin Gray
- Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia,School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Pauline Zaenker
- Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia,School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|