1
|
Lan TL, Shiau CY, Wang LW, Liu YM, Chen YW, Huang PI, Hu YW, Lai IC, Wu YH, Lai TY, Kang YM, Yang WC, Lin YJ, Pan YY, Chiu CC, Liu CS, Hsieh TS, Lee JC, Lin FY, Chan CH, Lin HC, Lan KL. Feasibility and safety of Taipei Veterans General Hospital Heavy Ion Therapy Center: The first carbon-ion irradiation facility in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 2025; 88:196-204. [PMID: 39815405 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000001207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unlike conventional photon radiotherapy, particle therapy has the advantage of dose distribution. Carbon-ion radiotherapy is also advantageous in terms of biological effectiveness and other radiobiological aspects. These benefits lead to a higher response probability for previously known radioresistant tumor types. Therefore, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, which is located in the northern district of Taipei, built the first carbon-ion irradiation facility in Taiwan. METHODS Taipei Veterans General Hospital completed a phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety of carbon-ion radiotherapy. Six patients (4 males and 2 females with prostate adenocarcinoma, sacral chordoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, or parotid high-grade carcinoma) were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 62.7 years. The mean dose was 57.3 Gy(RBE) (fraction range, 4-16 Gy[RBE]). RESULTS During this phase 1 trial, all patients were monitored for 3 months to evaluate acute toxicity and short-term outcomes after treatment with carbon irradiation. Only 2 patients experienced grade 2 toxicity, which resolved without medication 1 month after completing treatment. The tumor response demonstrated 1 complete response, 1 partial response, and 4 cases of stable disease. CONCLUSION Carbon-ion radiotherapy was determined to be an effective and safe treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tien-Li Lan
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Cheng-Ying Shiau
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Ling-Wei Wang
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yu-Ming Liu
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Wei Chen
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Technology, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC
- College of Nuclear Science, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Pin-I Huang
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yu-Wen Hu
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - I-Chun Lai
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yuan-Hung Wu
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Tzu-Yu Lai
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yu-Mei Kang
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wan-Chin Yang
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yu-Jung Lin
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Ying Pan
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chi-Chuan Chiu
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Ching-Sheng Liu
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Tung-Sheng Hsieh
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Jia-Cheng Lee
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Technology, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Fang-Yi Lin
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chien-Hsuan Chan
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Hui-Chia Lin
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Keng-Li Lan
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao B, Kanematsu N, Aoki S, Mori S, Mizuno H, Masuda T, Takei H, Ishikawa H. Optimizing the dose-averaged linear energy transfer for the dominant intraprostatic lesions in high-risk localized prostate cancer patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2025; 33:100727. [PMID: 40026913 PMCID: PMC11869034 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Revised: 02/04/2025] [Accepted: 02/05/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer often targets the entire prostate with a uniform dose despite the presence of high-risk dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs). This study investigated the feasibility of focal dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) boost for prostate carbon-ion radiotherapy to deposit higher LETd to DILs while ensuring desired relative biological effectiveness weighted dose coverage to targets and sparing organs at risk (OARs). Materials and methods A retrospective planning study was conducted on 15 localized prostate cancer cases. The DILs were identified on multiparametric MRI and used to define the boost target (PTVboost). Two treatment plans were designed for each patient: 1) conventional plan optimized by the single-field uniform dose technique, and 2) boost plan optimized by the multifield optimization and LET painting technique, to achieve LETd boost within the PTVboost. Dose and LETd metrics of the targets and OARs were compared between the two plans. Results Compared to the conventional plans, the boost plans delivered clinically acceptable dose coverage (D90% and D50%) to the target (PTV2) within 1% differences while significantly increasing the minimum LETd by 16 ∼ 24 keV/μm for the PTVboost (63.9 ± 2.8 vs. 44.0 ± 1.3 keV/μm, p < 0.001). Furthermore, these improvements were consistent across all cases, irrespective of their anatomical features, including the boost volume's size, location, and shape. Conclusion Focal LETd boost was a feasible strategy for prostate carbon-ion radiotherapy. This investigation demonstrated its superiority in delivering LETd boost without depending on tumor location and volume across different cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Zhao
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Kanematsu
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Shuri Aoki
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Mori
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Mizuno
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Takamitsu Masuda
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Takei
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iwai Y, Mori S, Ishikawa H, Kanematsu N, Matsumoto S, Nakaji T, Okonogi N, Kobayashi K, Wakatsuki M, Uno T, Yamada S. Inter-fractional error and intra-fractional motion of prostate and dosimetry comparisons of patient position registrations with versus without fiducial markers during treatment with carbon-ion radiotherapy. Radiol Phys Technol 2024; 17:504-517. [PMID: 38691309 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00808-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
A few reports have discussed the influence of inter-fractional position error and intra-fractional motion on dose distribution, particularly regarding a spread-out Bragg peak. We investigated inter-fractional and intra-fractional prostate position error by monitoring fiducial marker positions. In 2020, data from 15 patients with prostate cancer who received carbon-ion beam radiotherapy (CIRT) with gold markers were investigated. We checked marker positions before and during irradiation to calculate the inter-fractional positioning and intra-fractional movement and evaluated the CIRT dose distribution by adjusting the planning beam isocenter and clinical target volume (CTV) position. We compared the CTV dose coverages (CTV receiving 95% [V95%] or 98% [V98%] of the prescribed dose) between skeletal and fiducial matching irradiation on the treatment planning system. For inter-fractional error, the mean distance between the marker position in the planning images and that in a patient starting irradiation with skeletal matching was 1.49 ± 1.11 mm (95th percentile = 1.85 mm). The 95th percentile (maximum) values of the intra-fractional movement were 0.79 mm (2.31 mm), 1.17 mm (2.48 mm), 1.88 mm (4.01 mm), 1.23 mm (3.00 mm), and 2.09 mm (8.46 mm) along the lateral, inferior, superior, dorsal, and ventral axes, respectively. The mean V95% and V98% were 98.2% and 96.2% for the skeletal matching plan and 99.5% and 96.8% for the fiducial matching plan, respectively. Fiducial matching irradiation improved the CTV dose coverage compared with skeletal matching irradiation for CIRT for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuma Iwai
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Mori
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Kanematsu
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Shinnosuke Matsumoto
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Taku Nakaji
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Okonogi
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kana Kobayashi
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaru Wakatsuki
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Uno
- Department of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mori S, Hirai R, Sakata Y, Koto M, Ishikawa H. Shortening image registration time using a deep neural network for patient positional verification in radiotherapy. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:1563-1572. [PMID: 37639109 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01320-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
We sought to accelerate 2D/3D image registration computation time using image synthesis with a deep neural network (DNN) to generate digitally reconstructed radiographic (DRR) images from X-ray flat panel detector (FPD) images. And we explored the feasibility of using our DNN in the patient setup verification application. Images of the prostate and of the head and neck (H&N) regions were acquired by two oblique X-ray fluoroscopic units and the treatment planning CT. DNN was designed to generate DRR images from the FPD image data. We evaluated the quality of the synthesized DRR images to compare the ground-truth DRR images using the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Image registration accuracy and computation time were evaluated by comparing the 2D-3D image registration algorithm using DRR and FPD image data with DRR and synthesized DRR images. Mean PSNR values were 23.4 ± 3.7 dB and 24.1 ± 3.9 dB for the pelvic and H&N regions, respectively. Mean SSIM values for both cases were also similar (= 0.90). Image registration accuracy was degraded by a mean of 0.43 mm and 0.30°, it was clinically acceptable. Computation time was accelerated by a factor of 0.69. Our DNN successfully generated DRR images from FPD image data, and improved 2D-3D image registration computation time up to 37% in average.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichiro Mori
- Quantum Life and Medical Science Directorate, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
| | - Ryusuke Hirai
- Corporate Research and Development Center, Toshiba Corporation, Kanagawa, 212-8582, Japan
| | - Yukinobu Sakata
- Corporate Research and Development Center, Toshiba Corporation, Kanagawa, 212-8582, Japan
| | - Masashi Koto
- QST hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
He P, Mori S, Ono T, Nomoto A, Ishikawa H. Impact of varying the number of irradiation fields on dose distribution: A four-dimensional scanned carbon-ion lung radiotherapy. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2023; 212:111183. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
|
6
|
Sato H, Kasuya G, Ishikawa H, Nomoto A, Ono T, Nakajima M, Isozaki Y, Yamamoto N, Iwai Y, Nemoto K, Ichikawa T, Tsuji H, the Working Group for Genitourinary Tumors. Long-term clinical outcomes after 12-fractionated carbon-ion radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer Sci 2021; 112:3598-3606. [PMID: 34107139 PMCID: PMC8409298 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There are no clinical reports of long-term follow-up after carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) using a dose of 51.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 12 fractions for localized prostate cancer, or of a comparison of clinical outcomes between passive and scanning beam irradiation. A total of 256 patients with localized prostate cancer who received CIRT at a dose of 51.6 Gy (RBE) in 12 fractions using two different beam delivery techniques (passive [n = 45] and scanning [n = 211]), and who were followed for more than 1 year, were analyzed. The biochemical relapse-free (bRF) rate was defined by the Phoenix definition, and the actuarial toxicity rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of the 256 patients, 41 (16.0%), 111 (43.4%), and 104 (40.6%) were classified as low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively, after a median follow-up of 7.0 (range 1.1-10.4) years. Androgen deprivation therapy was performed in 212 patients (82.8%). The 5-year bRF rates of the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were 95.1%, 90.9%, and 91.1%, respectively. The 5-year rates of grade 2 late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities in all patients were 0.4% and 6.3%, respectively. No grade ≥3 toxicities were observed. There were no significant differences in the rates of bRF or grade 2 toxicities in patients who received passive irradiation versus scanning irradiation. Our long-term follow-up results showed that a CIRT regimen of 51.6 Gy (RBE) in 12 fractions for localized prostate cancer yielded a good therapeutic outcome and low toxicity rates irrespective of the beam delivery technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiraku Sato
- Department of Radiation OncologyFaculty of MedicineYamagata UniversityYamagataJapan
| | - Goro Kasuya
- Quantum Medical Science DirectorateNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (formerly the National Institute of Radiological Science Hospital)QST HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- Quantum Medical Science DirectorateNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (formerly the National Institute of Radiological Science Hospital)QST HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Akihiro Nomoto
- Quantum Medical Science DirectorateNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (formerly the National Institute of Radiological Science Hospital)QST HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Takashi Ono
- Department of Radiation OncologyFaculty of MedicineYamagata UniversityYamagataJapan
- Quantum Medical Science DirectorateNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (formerly the National Institute of Radiological Science Hospital)QST HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Mio Nakajima
- Quantum Medical Science DirectorateNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (formerly the National Institute of Radiological Science Hospital)QST HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Yuka Isozaki
- Quantum Medical Science DirectorateNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (formerly the National Institute of Radiological Science Hospital)QST HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Naoyoshi Yamamoto
- Quantum Medical Science DirectorateNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (formerly the National Institute of Radiological Science Hospital)QST HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Yuma Iwai
- Quantum Medical Science DirectorateNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (formerly the National Institute of Radiological Science Hospital)QST HospitalChibaJapan
- Department of RadiologyGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Kenji Nemoto
- Department of Radiation OncologyFaculty of MedicineYamagata UniversityYamagataJapan
| | - Tomohiko Ichikawa
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- Quantum Medical Science DirectorateNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (formerly the National Institute of Radiological Science Hospital)QST HospitalChibaJapan
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fujiwara T, Koba Y, Mitsuya Y, Nakamura R, Tatsumoto R, Kawahara S, Maehata K, Yamaguchi H, Chang W, Matsufuji N, Takahashi H. Development and characterization of optical readout well-type glass gas electron multiplier for dose imaging in clinical carbon beams. Phys Med 2021; 82:72-78. [PMID: 33588230 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.01.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of carbon ion beams in cancer therapy (also known as hadron therapy) is steadily growing worldwide; therefore, the demand for more efficient dosimetry systems is also increasing because daily quality assurance (QA) measurements of hadron radiotherapy is one of the most complex and time consuming tasks. The aim of this study is to develop a two-dimensional dosimetry system that offers high spatial resolution, a large field of view, quick data response, and a linear dose-response relationship. We demonstrate the dose imaging performance of a novel digital dose imager using carbon ion beams for hadron therapy. The dose imager is based on a newly-developed gaseous detector, a well-type glass gas electron multiplier. The imager is successfully operated in a hadron therapy facility with clinical intensity beams for radiotherapy. It features a high spatial resolution of less than 1 mm and an almost linear dose-response relationship with no saturation and very low linear-energy-transfer dependence. Experimental results show that the dose imager has the potential to improve dosimetry accuracy for daily QA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Fujiwara
- National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan; Research Institute of Electronics, Shizuoka University, Johoku 3-5-1, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu 432-8011, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Koba
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; Department of Radiological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa, Tokyo 116-8551, Japan
| | - Yuki Mitsuya
- Institute of Engineering Innovation, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
| | - Riichiro Nakamura
- Department of Applied Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motoka, Nishi, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
| | - Ryuta Tatsumoto
- Department of Applied Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motoka, Nishi, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
| | - Shuto Kawahara
- Department of Applied Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motoka, Nishi, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
| | - Keisuke Maehata
- Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Fukuoka Medical Technology, Teikyo University, 6-22 Misaki, Omuta, Fukuoka 836-8505, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Yamaguchi
- National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan
| | - Weishan Chang
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Naruhiro Matsufuji
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takahashi
- Institute of Engineering Innovation, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kopp B, Mein S, Tessonnier T, Besuglow J, Harrabi S, Heim E, Abdollahi A, Haberer T, Debus J, Mairani A. Rapid effective dose calculation for raster-scanning 4He ion therapy with the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM). Phys Med 2020; 81:273-284. [PMID: 33353795 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and verify effective dose (DRBE) calculation in 4He ion beam therapy based on the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) and evaluate the bio-sensitivity of mMKM-based plans to clinical parameters using a fast analytical dose engine. METHODS Mixed radiation field particle spectra (MRFS) databases have been generated with Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations for 4He-ion beams. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and DRBE calculation using MRFS were established within a fast analytical engine. Spread-out Bragg-Peaks (SOBPs) in water were optimized for two dose levels and two tissue types with photon linear-quadratic model parameters αph, βph, and (α/β)ph to verify MRFS-derived database implementation against computations with MC-generated mixed-field α and β databases. Bio-sensitivity of the SOBPs was investigated by varying absolute values of βph, while keeping (α/β)ph constant. Additionally, dose, dose-averaged linear energy transfer, and bio-sensitivity were investigated for two patient cases. RESULTS Using MRFS-derived databases, dose differences ≲2% in the plateau and SOBP are observed compared to computations with MC-generated databases. Bio-sensitivity studies show larger deviations when altering the absolute βph value, with maximum D50% changes of ~5%, with similar results for patient cases. Bio-sensitivity analysis indicates a greater impact on DRBE varying (α/β)ph than βph in mMKM. CONCLUSIONS The MRSF approach yielded negligible differences in the target and small differences in the plateau compared to MC-generated databases. The presented analyses provide guidance for proper implementation of RBE-weighted 4He ion dose prescription and planning with mMKM. The MRFS-DRBE calculation approach using mMKM will be implemented in a clinical treatment planning system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Kopp
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Mein
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Besuglow
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Harrabi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E Heim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Abdollahi
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Debus
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Four-dimensional carbon-ion pencil beam treatment planning comparison between robust optimization and range-adapted internal target volume for respiratory-gated liver and lung treatment. Phys Med 2020; 80:277-287. [PMID: 33246187 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
We investigated the dose differences between robust optimization-based treatment planning (4DRO) and range-adapted internal target volume (rITV). We used 4DCT dataset of 20 lung cancer and 20 liver cancer patients, respectively, who had been treated with respiratory-gated carbon-ion pencil beam scanning therapy. 4DRO and rITV plans were created with the same clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR) contours. Four-dimensional dose distribution was calculated using deformable image registration. Dose metrics (e.g. D95, V20) were analyzed. Statistical significance was assessed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For the lung cases, the mean CTV-D95 value for the rITV plan (=98.5%) was same as that for the 4DRO plan (=98.5%, P = 0.106), while the mean D95 value for the CTV + setup margin contour for the rITV plan (=98.2%) was higher than that for the 4DRO plan (95.2%, P < 0.001). For the liver cases, the mean CTV-D95 value for the rITV plan (=98.1%) was slightly lower than that for the 4DRO plan (=98.5%, P < 0.01), while the mean D95 value for the CTV + setup margin contour for the rITV plan (=98.0%) was higher than that for the 4DRO plan (94.1%, P < 0.001). For the doses to the organs at risk (OARs), the ipsilateral lung-V20/liver-V20 values for the rITV plan (=10.1%/19.7%) was significantly higher than that for the 4DRO plan (=8.6%/17.6, P < 0.001). Although the target coverage for 4DRO plan may be worse than that for rITV plan in the presence of the setup error, the 4DRO plan can improve OAR dose while preserving acceptable target dose coverage.
Collapse
|
10
|
Value of Three-Dimensional Imaging Systems for Image-Guided Carbon Ion Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11030297. [PMID: 30832346 PMCID: PMC6468538 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11030297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) allows excellent dose distribution because of the Bragg Peak. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, it delivers a higher dose with a smaller field. However, the dose distribution is sensitive to anatomical changes. Imaging technologies are necessary to reduce uncertainties during treatment, especially for hypofractionated and adaptive radiotherapy (ART). In-room computed tomography (CT) techniques, such as cone-beam CT (CBCT) and CT-on-rails are routinely used in photon centers and play a key role in improving treatment accuracy. For C-ion RT, there is an increasing demand for a three-dimensional (3D) image-guided system because of the limitations of the present two-dimensional (2D) imaging verification technology. This review discusses the current imaging system used in carbon ion centers and the potential benefits of a volumetric image-guided system.
Collapse
|
11
|
Real-time tumor tracking using fluoroscopic imaging with deep neural network analysis. Phys Med 2019; 59:22-29. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
12
|
Zhang H, Dai Z, Liu X, Chen W, Ma Y, He P, Dai T, Shen G, Yuan P, Li Q. A novel pencil beam model for carbon-ion dose calculation derived from Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med 2018; 55:15-24. [PMID: 30471815 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
An accurate kernel model is of vital importance for pencil-beam dose algorithm in charged particle therapy using precise spot-scanning beam delivery, in which an accurate depiction of the low dose envelope is especially crucial. Based on the Monte Carlo method, we investigated the dose contribution of secondary particles to the total dose and proposed a novel beam model to depict the lateral dose distribution of carbon-ion pencil beam in water. We demonstrated that the low dose envelope in single-spot profiles in water could be adequately modelled with the addition of a logistic distribution to a double Gaussian one, which was verified in both single carbon-ion pencil beam and superposed fields of different sizes with multiple pencil beams. Its superiority was mainly manifested at medium depths especially for high-energy beams with small fields compared with single, double and triple Gaussian models, where the secondary particles influenced the total dose considerably. The double Gaussian-logistic model could reduce the deviations from 4.1%, 1.7% to 0.3% in the plateau and peak regions, and from 19.2%, 4.9% to 1.2% in the tail region compared for the field size factor (FSF) calculations of 344 MeV/u carbon-ion pencil beam with the single and double Gaussian models. Compared with the triple Gaussian one, our newly-proposed model was on a par with it, even better than it in the plateau and peak regions. Thus our work will be helpful for improving the dose calculation accuracy for carbon-ion therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China; Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
| | - Zhongying Dai
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China; Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| | - Xinguo Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China; Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| | - Weiqiang Chen
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China; Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| | - Yuanyuan Ma
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China; Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| | - Pengbo He
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China; Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| | - Tianyuan Dai
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China; Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
| | - Guosheng Shen
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China; Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| | - Ping Yuan
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China.
| | - Qiang Li
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 73000, China; Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Trnková P, Knäusl B, Actis O, Bert C, Biegun AK, Boehlen TT, Furtado H, McClelland J, Mori S, Rinaldi I, Rucinski A, Knopf AC. Clinical implementations of 4D pencil beam scanned particle therapy: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2016 and 2017. Phys Med 2018; 54:121-130. [PMID: 30337001 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2016 and 2017, the 8th and 9th 4D treatment planning workshop took place in Groningen (the Netherlands) and Vienna (Austria), respectively. This annual workshop brings together international experts to discuss research, advances in clinical implementation as well as problems and challenges in 4D treatment planning, mainly in spot scanned proton therapy. In the last two years several aspects like treatment planning, beam delivery, Monte Carlo simulations, motion modeling and monitoring, QA phantoms as well as 4D imaging were thoroughly discussed. This report provides an overview of discussed topics, recent findings and literature review from the last two years. Its main focus is to highlight translation of 4D research into clinical practice and to discuss remaining challenges and pitfalls that still need to be addressed and to be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Trnková
- HollandPTC, P.O. Box 5046, 2600 GA Delft, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, P.O. Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara Knäusl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Austria
| | - Oxana Actis
- Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Aleksandra K Biegun
- KVI-Center for Advanced Radiation Technology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Till T Boehlen
- Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Hugo Furtado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Austria
| | - Jamie McClelland
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Dept. Medical Physics and Biomedical, University College London, London, UK
| | - Shinichiro Mori
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences for Charged Particle Therapy, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ilaria Rinaldi
- Lyon 1 University and CNRS/IN2P3, UMR 5822, 69622 Villeurbanne, France; MAASTRO Clinic, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Antje C Knopf
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|