1
|
Lazzeri L, Andersson KL, Angioni S, Arena A, Arena S, Bartiromo L, Berlanda N, Bonin C, Candiani M, Centini G, Forno SD, Donati A, Exacoustos C, Fuggetta E, Labanca L, Maiorana A, Maneschi F, Mattei A, Muzii L, Ottolina J, Perandini A, Perelli F, Pino I, Porpora MG, Remorgida V, Scaramuzzino S, Schimberni M, Seracchioli R, Solima E, Vignali M, Zupi E, Martire FG. How to Manage Endometriosis in Adolescence: The Endometriosis Treatment Italian Club Approach. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023; 30:616-626. [PMID: 37001691 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
The evaluation of endometriosis in an adolescent girl is a challenging topic. The initial stage of the disease and the limited diagnostic instrument appropriate for the youth age and for its typical features can reduce the ability of the gynecologist. At the same time, missing a prompt diagnosis can delay the beginning of specific and punctual management of endometriosis, which could avoid a postponed diagnosis from 6 to 12 years, typical of adolescent girls complaining of dysmenorrhea. This article aimed to answer all the potential questions around the diagnosis and management of endometriosis in adolescents starting from a clinical case looking at the possible solution that is easily reproducible in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Lazzeri
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine (Drs. Lazzeri, Centini, Martire, and Zupi), Università di Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Karin Louise Andersson
- Department of Territory Health (Dr. Andersson, Exacoustos), Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Angioni
- Department of Surgical Sciences (Dr. Angioni), Università di Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Arena
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (Drs. A. Arena, Del Forno, and Seracchioli), DIMEC, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Saverio Arena
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Arena), Santa Maria della Misericordia hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ludovica Bartiromo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Bartiromo, Candiani, Ottolina, and Schimberni), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Berlanda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Berlanda and Donati), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Cecilia Bonin
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (Drs. Bonin and Perandini), Università di Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Candiani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Bartiromo, Candiani, Ottolina, and Schimberni), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Centini
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine (Drs. Lazzeri, Centini, Martire, and Zupi), Università di Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Simona Del Forno
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (Drs. A. Arena, Del Forno, and Seracchioli), DIMEC, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Agnese Donati
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Berlanda and Donati), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Caterina Exacoustos
- Department of Territory Health (Dr. Andersson, Exacoustos), Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Unit (Drs. Exacoustos, and Martire), University of Rome "Tor Vergata" Rome, Italy
| | - Eliana Fuggetta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Fuggetta and Maneschi), San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital (Drs. Labanca and Martire), Roma, Italy
| | - Luca Labanca
- Department of Surgical Sciences (Drs. Labanca), Valdarno Hospital, Azienda Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | - Antonio Maiorana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Maiorana), ARNAS Ospedale Civico Piazza Nicola, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Maneschi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Fuggetta and Maneschi), San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital (Drs. Labanca and Martire), Roma, Italy
| | - Alberto Mattei
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine (Drs. Lazzeri, Centini, Martire, and Zupi), Università di Siena, Siena, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Unit (Drs. Exacoustos, and Martire), University of Rome "Tor Vergata" Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urology (Drs. Muzii, Porpora, and Scaramuzzino), Università di Roma La Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Jessica Ottolina
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Bartiromo, Candiani, Ottolina, and Schimberni), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessio Perandini
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (Drs. Bonin and Perandini), Università di Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, Verona, Italy
| | - Federica Perelli
- Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Drs. Mattei and Perelli), Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Ida Pino
- Preventive Gynecology Unit (Dr. Pino), European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Porpora
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urology (Drs. Muzii, Porpora, and Scaramuzzino), Università di Roma La Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentino Remorgida
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Remorgida), University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Sara Scaramuzzino
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urology (Drs. Muzii, Porpora, and Scaramuzzino), Università di Roma La Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Schimberni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Bartiromo, Candiani, Ottolina, and Schimberni), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (Drs. A. Arena, Del Forno, and Seracchioli), DIMEC, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Phisiopatology (Dr. Seracchioli), IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna Italy
| | - Eugenio Solima
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Solima and Vignali), Macedonio Melloni Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Vignali
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Solima and Vignali), Macedonio Melloni Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Errico Zupi
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine (Drs. Lazzeri, Centini, Martire, and Zupi), Università di Siena, Siena, Italy.
| | - Francesco Giuseppe Martire
- Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Drs. Mattei and Perelli), Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Advances in Imaging for Assessing Pelvic Endometriosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12122960. [PMID: 36552967 PMCID: PMC9777476 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12122960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, due to the development of standardized diagnostic protocols associated with an improvement in the associated technology, the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis using imaging is becoming a reality. In particular, transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance are today the two imaging techniques that can accurately identify the majority of the phenotypes of endometriosis. This review focuses not only on these most common imaging modalities but also on some additional radiological techniques that were proposed for rectosigmoid colon endometriosis, such as double-contrast barium enema, rectal endoscopic ultrasonography, multidetector computed tomography enema, computed tomography colonography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography with 16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-estradiol.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bordonné C, Puntonet J, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Bourdon M, Marcellin L, Dion E, Plu-Bureau G, Santulli P, Chapron C. Imaging for evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73:290-303. [PMID: 34008384 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04710-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Endometriosis and adenomyosis are two frequent diseases that impair women's quality of life by causing pain and infertility. Both endometriosis and adenomyosis are heterogeneous diseases that manifest as different forms. Adenomyosis may be described as diffuse adenomyosis, focal adenomyosis especially of the outer myometrium and cystic adenomyoma. Endometriosis has three phenotypes: superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP), ovarian endometrioma (OMA), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). These two diseases are closely linked, and it is now clear that adenomyosis can either arise on its own or coexist with endometriosis. There is a strong clinical relationship between endometriosis and adenomyosis according to their respective phenotypes. Various classifications are available to describe both diseases. Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) and/or pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the first examination performed when endometriosis or adenomyosis are suspected. These two imaging techniques, used in a combination manner, allow accurate description of both endometriosis and adenomyosis, to assess the diagnosis and to improve clinical and surgical care. In this review, we described the different imaging aspects of endometriosis and adenomyosis to help the less experienced radiologist or gynecologist in the diagnosis and evaluation of those diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne Bordonné
- Section of Radiology, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France - .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, Paris, France -
| | - Julien Puntonet
- Section of Radiology, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Lorraine Maitrot-Mantelet
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology II and of Reproduction Medicine, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, INSERM, Cochin Institute, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Mathilde Bourdon
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, Paris, France.,Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology II and of Reproduction Medicine, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, INSERM, Cochin Institute, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Louis Marcellin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, Paris, France.,Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology II and of Reproduction Medicine, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, INSERM, Cochin Institute, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Dion
- Section of Radiology, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Geneviève Plu-Bureau
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology II and of Reproduction Medicine, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, INSERM, Cochin Institute, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Pietro Santulli
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, Paris, France.,Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology II and of Reproduction Medicine, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, INSERM, Cochin Institute, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Charles Chapron
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, Paris, France.,Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology II and of Reproduction Medicine, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, INSERM, Cochin Institute, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Celli V, Ciulla S, Dolciami M, Satta S, Ercolani G, Porpora MG, Catalano C, Manganaro L. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in endometriosis-associated pain. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73:553-571. [PMID: 33904689 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04782-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endometriosis affects 10%-15% of women in reproductive age and may cause no-cyclic chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, urinary tract symptoms, and it is frequently associated with infertility. The peak of incidence is between 24 and 29 years old and the clinical diagnosis of endometriosis is generally delayed by 6-7 years. Laparoscopy with surgical biopsies is the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of endometriosis, with histological verification of endometrial ectopic glands and/or stroma. However, nowadays two different non-invasive modalities are routinely used for a presumptive diagnosis: Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A structured search using PubMed was performed starting from October 2020 and including all relevant original and review articles published since 2000. The search used the following key word combinations: "Endometriosis MRI" AND "DIE and MRI" (45); "MRI endometriosis and Pelvic Pain" OR "Endometriosis and MRI technical development" (296). Ultimately, 87 articles were deemed relevant and used as the literature basis of this review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS TVUS represents the first imaging approach for endometriosis showing a good diagnostic performance but it is highly operator dependent. MRI is a second level examination often used in complex cases indeterminate after TVUS and in pre-operative planning. MRI is considered the best imaging technique for mapping endometriosis since it provides a more reliable map of deep infiltrating endometriosis than physical examination and transvaginal ultrasound. We have analyzed and described the main forms of endometriosis: adnexal endometriosis, adenomyosis, peritoneal implants and deep infiltrating endometriosis, showing their appearance in the two imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS Endometriosis is one of the most common gynecologic disorders correlated to chronic pelvic pain whose treatment is still today complex and controversial. In this context, MRI has become an important additional non-invasive tool to investigate cases of chronic pelvic pain related to deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) with or without neural involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Celli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sandra Ciulla
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Miriam Dolciami
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Serena Satta
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giada Ercolani
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria G Porpora
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Manganaro
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy - lucia.manganaro@uniroma1
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rousset P, Bischoff E, Charlot M, Grangeon F, Dubernard G, Paparel P, Lega JC, Golfier F. Bladder endometriosis: Preoperative MRI analysis with assessment of extension to ureteral orifices. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020; 102:255-263. [PMID: 33339775 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in locating endometriosis implants within the bladder wall with assessment of ureteral orifice extension using surgical findings as standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS MRI examinations of 39 consecutive women (mean age: 31.2±5.5 [SD] years; age range: 22-42years) operated in 3 university hospitals for bladder endometriosis over a 6-year period were reviewed by 2 independent readers. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Kappa tests. Results of consensus reading were used to calculate sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis, location and extent of endometriosis implants using surgical findings as the standard of reference. RESULTS Mean bladder repletion volume was 134±110 [SD] mL (range: 21-479mL). The mean largest endometriosis implant diameter was 30±7 [SD] mm (range: 19-41mm). On MR images, 34/39 (87%) endometriosis implants were present in the two anterior thirds of the dome (k=0.45), 31/39 (79%) extended or were present in the posterior third pouch (k=0.92) and 25/39 (64%) extended into the bladder base (k=0.84) with sensitivities of 100% (31/31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 89-100%), 100% (30/30; 95% CI: 88-100%) and 90% (19/21; 95% CI: 69-98%), respectively, specificities of 83% (5/6, 95% CI: 36-100), 88% (7/8, 95% CI: 47-100%), 87% (13/15; 95% CI: 52-96), respectively and accuracies of 97% (36/37, 95% CI: 86-100%), 97% (37/38; 95% CI: 86-100%), and 89% (32/36; 95% CI: 74-97%), respectively. In 9 (9/25; 36%) patients with bladder base involvement, a zero distance was reported between endometriosis implants and ureteral orifices, all but one presenting with low-to-moderate bladder volumes. In the two patients who needed ureteral resection-reimplantation, ureteral dilation was associated with a zero distance. External adenomyosis was reported in 26/39 (66%) patients (k=0.94). CONCLUSION A dedicated preoperative MRI work-up for bladder endometriosis helps accurately depict and locate endometriosis implants. Adequate bladder filling is needed to improve appropriate estimate of the distance between endometriosis implants and ureteral orifices to better predict requirement of ureteral resection-reimplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Rousset
- Lyon 1 Claude-Bernard University, EMR 3738, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | - Elodie Bischoff
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Mathilde Charlot
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Flavia Grangeon
- Lyon 1 Claude-Bernard University, EMR 3738, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Gil Dubernard
- Lyon 1 Claude-Bernard University, LabTAU, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, 69004 Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Paparel
- Lyon 1 Claude-Bernard University, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Urology Department, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Lega
- Lyon 1 Claude-Bernard University, UMR CNRS 5558, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Internal and Vascular Medicine Department, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - François Golfier
- Lyon 1 Claude-Bernard University, EMR 3738, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Gynecological Oncological, and Obstetrics Department, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abdalla Ribeiro HS, da Costa Porto BT, Bassoi L, Ninomiya GY, Tomasi MC, Cervantes GV, Ribeiro PA. Effect of nodule size on symptoms and the choice of surgical technique in patients with bladder endometriosis. JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND PELVIC PAIN DISORDERS 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/2284026520977996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: In this study, we evaluated the relationships between symptoms of bladder endometriosis (EDT), lesion size, and the subsequent surgical technique used to excise the lesion. Methods: This is retrospective observational study of patients who underwent surgery in the Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Section at Hospital da Santa Casa of São Paulo, Brazil. A sample population of 39 women diagnosed with bladder EDT was included from 463 women presenting with deep pelvic EDT between January 2010 and March 2017. Clinical evaluations and surgical treatments for each EDT were performed. Results: Of the 39 women, 43.58% had dysmenorrhea or dyspareunia and 2.56% had hematuria. Furthermore, 21.10% presented with dysuria and endometriotic nodules on the bladder ( p < 0.04). The nodules had reached the muscle layer in 97.30% of patients, and a further 2.60% had reached the mucosal layer. In addition to bladder involvement, other pelvic regions were affected, including the left (15.8%) and right (13.2%) round ligament, left (68.4%) and right (65.8%) uterosacral ligament, retrocervical region (84.20%), and ureter (45.71%). Conclusion: The patients’ pain symptoms were found to be associated with bladder endometriosis and nodule size. Partial cystectomy with complete lesion excision might be an effective treatment option to relieve these symptoms. A study with a larger sample population is needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ribeiro
- Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Clinic, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Beatriz Taliberti da Costa Porto
- Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Clinic, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luisa Bassoi
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Mariana C Tomasi
- Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Clinic, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Graziele V Cervantes
- Gynecological Endoscopy and Endometriosis Clinic, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Ayroza Ribeiro
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mason BR, Chatterjee D, Menias CO, Thaker PH, Siegel CL, Yano M. Encyclopedia of endometriosis: a pictorial rad-path review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:1587-1607. [PMID: 31919647 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02381-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Endometriosis affects approximately 10% of reproductive age women and represents a significant cause of pelvic pain and infertility. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of endometriosis is often delayed by years. Endometriosis may manifest as cystic lesions in the ovaries known as endometriomas. Superficial endometriosis is typically detected by laparoscopy along the pelvic peritoneum as these lesions tend to be difficult to detect by imaging. Deep infiltrative endometriosis may be detected by ultrasound, CT or MRI in classic locations within the pelvis, such as the posterior cul-de-sac and uterosacral ligaments. Endometriosis may also involve the thorax, gastrointestinal and urinary tracts, and locations such as the abdominal wall and abdominal organs. We present MRI and CT case examples, together with corresponding laparoscopic and histopathology images to enhance radiologists' understanding of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon R Mason
- Department of Radiology, Stillwater Medical Center, Stillwater, OK, USA
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Premal H Thaker
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Cary Lynn Siegel
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd., Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Motoyo Yano
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Foti PV, Farina R, Palmucci S, Vizzini IAA, Libertini N, Coronella M, Spadola S, Caltabiano R, Iraci M, Basile A, Milone P, Cianci A, Ettorre GC. Endometriosis: clinical features, MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Insights Imaging 2018; 9:149-172. [PMID: 29450853 PMCID: PMC5893487 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-017-0591-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Revised: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We illustrate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of endometriosis. Background Endometriosis is a chronic gynaecological condition affecting women of reproductive age and may cause pelvic pain and infertility. It is characterized by the growth of functional ectopic endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus and includes three different manifestations: ovarian endometriomas, peritoneal implants, deep pelvic endometriosis. The primary locations are in the pelvis; extrapelvic endometriosis may rarely occur. Diagnosis requires a combination of clinical history, invasive and non-invasive techniques. The definitive diagnosis is based on laparoscopy with histological confirmation. Diagnostic imaging is necessary for treatment planning. MRI is as a second-line technique after ultrasound. The MRI appearance of endometriotic lesions is variable and depends on the quantity and age of haemorrhage, the amount of endometrial cells, stroma, smooth muscle proliferation and fibrosis. The purpose of surgery is to achieve complete resection of all endometriotic lesions in the same operation. Conclusion Owing to the possibility to perform a complete assessment of all pelvic compartments at one time, MRI represents the best imaging technique for preoperative staging of endometriosis, in order to choose the more appropriate surgical approach and to plan a multidisciplinary team work. Teaching Points • Endometriosis includes ovarian endometriomas, peritoneal implants and deep pelvic endometriosis. • MRI is a second-line imaging technique after US. • Deep pelvic endometriosis is associated with chronic pelvic pain and infertility. • Endometriosis is characterized by considerable diagnostic delay. • MRI is the best imaging technique for preoperative staging of endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Valerio Foti
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.
| | - Renato Farina
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Stefano Palmucci
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Ilenia Anna Agata Vizzini
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Norma Libertini
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Coronella
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Saveria Spadola
- Department G.F. Ingrassia - Institute of Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Rosario Caltabiano
- Department G.F. Ingrassia - Institute of Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Iraci
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties - Institute of Obstetrics and Ginecology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Basile
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Pietro Milone
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Cianci
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties - Institute of Obstetrics and Ginecology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
- Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Méndez Fernández R, Barrera Ortega J. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic endometriosis. RADIOLOGIA 2017; 59:286-296. [PMID: 28476282 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2017.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Revised: 02/04/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis is common in women of reproductive age; it can cause pelvic pain and infertility. It is important to diagnose endometriosis and to thoroughly evaluate its extension, especially when surgical treatment is being considered. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with careful examination technique and interpretation enables more accurate and complete diagnosis and staging than ultrasonography, especially in cases of deep pelvic endometriosis. Furthermore, MRI can identify implants in sites that can be difficult to access in endoscopic or laparoscopic explorations. In this article, we describe the appropriate MRI protocol for the study of pelvic endometriosis and the MRI signs of pelvic organ involvement. It is necessary to know the subtle findings and to look for them so we can ensure that they are not overlooked. We describe clinical grading systems for endometriosis and review the diagnostic efficacy of MRI in comparison with other imaging techniques and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Méndez Fernández
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico. Hospital Clínico San Carlos y RM N.ª Sra. del Rosario, Madrid, España.
| | - J Barrera Ortega
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico. Hospital Clínico San Carlos y RM N.ª Sra. del Rosario, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ferrero S, Candiani M, Somigliana E, Viganò P, Vercellini P. Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment, Impact on Fertility, and Risk of Malignant Transformation. Eur Urol 2016; 71:790-807. [PMID: 28040358 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The bladder is the most common site affected in urinary tract endometriosis. There is controversy regarding the pathogenesis, clinical management (diagnosis and treatment), impact on fertility, and risk of malignant transformation of bladder endometriosis (BE). OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate evidence regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment, impact on female fertility, and risk of malignant transformation of BE. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of PubMed/Medline from inception until October 2016 was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and was registered in the PROSPERO registry (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; CRD42016039281). Eighty-seven articles were selected for inclusion in this analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS BE is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma in the detrusor muscle. Ultrasonography is the first-line technique for assessment of BE owing to its accuracy, safety, and cost. Clinical management can be conservative, using hormonal therapies, or surgical. When conservative treatment is preferred, estrogen-progestogen combinations and progestogens should be chosen because of their favorable profile that allows long-term therapy. Surgery should guarantee complete removal of the bladder nodule to minimize recurrence, so transurethral surgery alone should be avoided in favor of segmental bladder resection. There is not a strong rationale for hypothesizing a detrimental impact of BE per se on fertility. Furthermore, current evidence does not support the removal of bladder endometriotic lesions because of the potential risk of malignant transformation since this phenomenon is exceedingly rare. CONCLUSIONS BE is a challenging condition, and the common coexistence of other types of endometriosis means that clinical management of BE should involve collaboration between gynecologists and urologists. PATIENT SUMMARY In this article we review available knowledge on bladder endometriosis. The review provides a useful tool to guide physicians in the management of this complex condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS AOU San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS AOU San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Massimo Candiani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University School of Medicine, IRCCS, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Edgardo Somigliana
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano and Department of Obstet-Gynecol, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Viganò
- Reproductive Sciences Laboratory, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Vercellini
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano and Department of Obstet-Gynecol, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
[Retroperitoneal endometriosis : When a rare form of endometriosis becomes a urological disease]. Urologe A 2016; 55:756-62. [PMID: 27294488 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-016-0119-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retroperitoneal endometriosis is a common benign disease, which requires an interdisciplinary approach. In the clinical practice diagnosis is often delayed for years after onset of the unspecific symptoms so that increased awareness is necessary for detection of the presence of the disease. OBJECTIVE This article provides a description of the disease including the symptoms and pathogenesis, an introduction to the complexity of diagnostic investigations and the current therapy recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS Comparison of current therapy recommendations according to the guidelines under consideration of individual studies and background research. Assessment of studies and the accompanying interpretations with the intention of presenting an introduction to the topic with therapy recommendations. RESULTS From a urological point of view retroperitoneal endometriosis is a benign disease affecting the ureters and urinary bladder. Involvement of the ureters leading to hydronephrosis caused by ureteral compression represents an absolute indication for therapy. Recurrent macrohematuria can also necessitate treatment. Treatment includes surgical excision of the focal point of endometriosis as the first line therapy. Various operative procedures and access routes are available but when possible a minimally invasive procedure should be used. A second line drug therapy is also possible. CONCLUSION Surgical excision of a clinically significant focus of endometriosis is the gold standard for therapy. This procedure should take place in a specialized center within an interdisciplinary consensus. Due to the fact that endometriosis is primarily a benign disease, medical clarification for the patient concerning the benefits and risks of therapy is absolutely necessary. An individual therapy concept under consideration of factors, such as the specific clinical relevance and psychological stress is recommended and in close cooperation with the patient.
Collapse
|
13
|
Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in the Management of Bladder Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22:403-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Revised: 10/27/2014] [Accepted: 10/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
14
|
Increased dose single-agent gemcitabine in platinum-taxane resistant metastatic ovarian cancer. TUMORI JOURNAL 2015; 101:36-40. [PMID: 25702671 DOI: 10.5301/je.5000209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
CONCLUSION In platinum–taxane resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), we aimed to determine the effectiveness. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2004 and 2013, patients afflicted with platinum–taxane resistant EOC and who were administered a 30-minute i.v. infusion of single-agent gemcitabine at a dose of 1,250 mg/m2 on the 1st, 8th and 15th days, every 28 days, were examined retrospectively. RESULTS Twenty-six patients with platinum–taxane resistant EOC were included in the study. The overall survival (OS) was 48 months. The median survival after becoming platinum–taxane resistant was 16 months for the study population. Median time to progression (TTP) and median survival after becoming platinum–taxane resistant for patients who received second-line treatment were 3.3 months and 16 months, respectively; for patients who received third-line treatment with gemcitabine, these were 3.7 months and 19 months, respectively. Administration of gemcitabine as second- and third-line chemotherapy in platinum–taxane resistant EOC, provides similar TTP and OS outcomes (p = 0.4, p = 0.9) with a similar response and toxicity rate. CONCLUSIONS Second- and third-line gemcitabine at a dose of 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days as a 30-minute i.v. infusion in platinum–taxane resistant EOC is an effective treatment option with a tolerable and manageable toxicity.
Collapse
|