Maternal clinical disease characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes in twin and singleton pregnancies with severe preeclampsia

Effect of Third Interstitial Fluid on Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Severe Pre-eclampsia and Twin Pregnancy: A 5-year Single-center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify the effect of third interstitial fluid on adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies with severe pre-eclampsia, and explore the differences in bad ending between twins and singletons.

METHODS

The present retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with severe pre-eclampsia, who delivered in Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China, between 2017 and 2022. The adverse outcomes in singleton and twin pregnancies with severe pre-eclampsia were initially investigated. Then, the diverse maternal and fetal consequences between singleton and twin pregnancies in patients with severe pre-eclampsia were compared after merging with the third interstitial fluid.

RESULTS

A total of 709 patients were included for the present study. Among these patients, 68 patients had twin pregnancies, and 641 patients had singleton pregnancies. The rate of postpartum hemorrhage (2.81% vs. 13.24%, P<0.001), and admission rate to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) after birth (30.73% vs. 63.24%, P=0.011) were significantly higher in twin pregnancies. The neonatal weight of twins was statistically lower than singletons (1964.73±510.61 g vs. 2142.92±731.25 g, P=0.008). For the groups with the third interstitial fluid, the delivery week (P=0.001) and rate of admission to the NICU after birth were significantly advanced in twin pregnancy group, when compared to singleton pregnancy group (P=0.032), and the length of hospital stay was shorter (P=0.044). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the twin pregnancy group and the singletony pregnancy group without the third interstitial fluid.

CONCLUSION

The maternal and fetal adverse outcomes of patients with severe pre-eclampsia increased in twin pregnancies, when compared to singleton pregnancies. Thus, when patients develop the third interstitial fluid, twin pregnancies would more likely lead to adverse fetal outcomes, when compared to singleton pregnancies, and there would be no significant difference in maternal adverse outcomes. More attention should be given to patients who merge with the third interstitial fluid.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in twin vs. singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology

OBJECTIVE

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Although twin pregnancies had a higher risk of developing HDP, it is not known whether HDP in twins will increase the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. We aimed to assess whether this association differed in singleton and twin pregnancies in women who conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART).

METHODS

We finally included 193,590 live births born via ART from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) for the years 2015-2019. We used Log-binomial regression to evaluate the associations between HDP and the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes in ART mothers.

RESULTS

Among 193,590 ART-treated mothers, there were 140,870 and 52,720 mothers who had singleton pregnancies and twin pregnancies, respectively. Those ART mothers with twin pregnancies had a higher rate of HDP than singleton pregnancies (20.5% vs. 11.0%). In singleton pregnancies, the risks of preterm birth [adjusted risk ratio (aRR)): 2.80, 95% CI 2.67-2.93], low birth weight (aRR: 2.80, 95% CI 2.67-2.93), small for gestational age (aRR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.34-1.49), 5 min Apgar <7 (aRR: 1.66, 95% CI 1.50-1.83) and cesarean section (aRR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.21-1.25) were significantly higher in HDP mothers than in non-HDP mothers respectively. However, in contrast to singleton pregnancies, these associations were weak or reversed in twin pregnancies, after adjusting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

In ART-treated women, although twin pregnancies had a higher HDP rate, the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes associated with HDP was lower than that of singletons.

Outcomes Associated With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Twin Compared With Singleton Gestations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether pregnancy outcomes associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in twin pregnancies differ relatively from those in singleton pregnancy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of all women with a liveborn singleton or twin hospital birth in Ontario, Canada, between 2012 and 2019. Data were obtained from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between women with and without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in twin gestations, and separately in singleton gestations. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% CIs were generated using modified Poisson regression and were compared between twins and singletons using relative risk ratios.

RESULTS

Overall, 932,218 women met the study criteria, of whom 917,542 (98.4%) and 14,676 (1.6%) had singleton and twin gestations, respectively. The incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was higher in women with twin compared with singleton gestations (14.4% vs 6.4%, aRR 1.85 [1.76-1.94]). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were associated with certain adverse outcomes in singleton gestations only and with other adverse outcomes in both the singleton and twin gestations, but the aRR was lower in twins. For example, preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (singletons: 15.2% [hypertensive disorders of pregnancy] vs 5.4% [no hypertensive disorders of pregnancy], aRR 2.42; twins: 67.5% [hypertensive disorders of pregnancy] vs 50.4% [no hypertensive disorders of pregnancy], aRR 1.30) and neonatal respiratory morbidity (singletons: 16.3% [hypertensive disorders of pregnancy] vs 8.7% [no hypertensive disorders of pregnancy], aRR 1.50; twins: 39.8% [hypertensive disorders of pregnancy] vs 32.7% [no hypertensive disorders of pregnancy], aRR 1.13). These findings persisted in the subgroups of women with preeclampsia and early-onset preeclampsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the absolute risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes is higher in twin compared with singleton pregnancies, the incremental risk of adverse outcomes associated with hypertensive disorders in twin pregnancies is lower than the incremental risk in singleton pregnancies. These findings may be attributed in part to the higher baseline risk of preterm birth and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin compared with singleton pregnancies.

A Review of Research Progress of Pregnancy with Twins with Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia has a significant long-term effect on the health of both mothers and babies. Preeclampsia-related pregnancy complications increase the morbidity and mortality of pregnant women and their fetuses by 5-8%. The recent advancement of assisted reproductive technology, combined with a rise in the number of elderly pregnant women, has resulted in pregnancy incidence with twins. Twins pregnant women have a 2-3 times greater risk of developing preeclampsia than singleton pregnant women, and it happens sooner and progresses faster. It is more severe and may appear in an atypical way. End-organ damage, such as renal failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, pulmonary edema, placental abruption, and cesarean section, are related maternal complications. Fetal growth retardation, stillbirth, and premature delivery with obstetric signs are all fetal complications. According to studies, all multiple pregnancies can take low-dose aspirin (60-150 mg) to minimize the risk of preeclampsia. To improve pregnancy outcomes and reduce the inherent risk of pregnancy with twins, twins should be handled as a high-risk pregnancy and treated differently than singletons. The literature on twin pregnancy with preeclampsia is the subject of this review. It will examine the current state of research on preeclampsia in pregnancy with twins, including the occurrence, diagnosis, and pathophysiological process. Moreover, the effect of pregnancy with twins on the perinatal outcome and pregnancy management of pregnancy with twins, including blood pressure management and preeclampsia prevention and treatment, is examined in this literature review. The goal is to figure out what kind of diagnosis and care you may need.

Twin gestation and the burden of adult cardio-renal disease

The rate of twin births has increased by nearly 80% in recent decades largely due to advanced reproductive technologies. Twins are often born preterm and/or growth restricted which are independently associated with impaired renal and vascular development. Many preterm and twin infants are surviving into adulthood, albeit with an increased burden of chronic health conditions. Twinning as a research tool offers the unique opportunity to investigate the impact of genetics versus the environment on clinical outcomes. This educational review will focus on delineating our current understanding of the renal and cardiovascular development and long-term outcomes among twin born individuals. Specifically, existing literature regarding how twins differ in kidney size and function as well as vascular stiffness and hypertension profiles from singletons will be discussed. The unique situation of twin-twin transfusion syndrome which is associated with distinct short- and long-term cardio-renal disease will be highlighted. Ultimately, the ability to stratify risk of future cardio-renal disease at birth for infants born preterm and/or growth restricted, including twins, is important to guide clinical follow up. In addition, this early risk stratification could direct research efforts to better understand the mechanisms driving impaired organogenesis and allow for discovery of therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying disease progression and improving longevity in the most vulnerable infant subgroups.

Clinical characteristics of preeclampsia in twin versus singleton pregnancies

Objective: We aimed to compare features of preeclampsia between twin and singleton pregnancies.Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, women with twin pregnancies who were diagnosed with preeclampsia were matched to singleton pregnancies controls.Results: Ninety-four women with twin gestation diagnosed with preeclampsia were compared to singleton pregnancies with preeclampsia. Twin pregnancies were diagnosed at an earlier mean gestational age (33.23 ± 7.32 vs 35.93 ± 3.52 weeks, p = .001), and had an earlier gestational age at delivery (35.05 ± 2.28 vs 36.31 ± 3.25 weeks, p = .002) in comparison to singleton pregnancies. Mean systolic blood pressure at diagnosis was lower (147.22 ± 14.62 vs 152.7 ± 15.22 mmHg, p = .013), and the rate of thrombocytopenia <100,000 platelets/microliter, (17.02% vs 7.45%, p = .045) was higher in the twin preeclampsia group. A subanalysis for diagnosis prior to 34 weeks of gestation revealed that the rate of chronic hypertension was lower (3.03% vs 26.32%, p = .020), and the gestational age at delivery was higher (32.83 ± 2.16 weeks vs 31.02 ± 2.49, p = .008) among the twin preeclampsia group. In the prior to 34 weeks gestation preeclampsia subanalysis, less women in the twin group were hospitalized due to maternal indications (hypertension, ominous signs for PE, disturbed laboratory tests and suspicion for intra-hepatic cholestasis of pregnancies) in comparison to the singleton preeclampsia group (63.64% vs 89.47%, p = .028), while non-maternal/fetal indications (active labor, premature rupture of membranes, cervical dynamics, latent phase or gastroenteritis) for hospitalization were more common in the twin preeclampsia group (30.30% vs 0.00%).Conclusion: Preeclampsia in women with twin pregnancies is diagnosed at an earlier gestational age with lower level of hypertension and a higher rate of thrombocytopenia in comparison to singleton pregnancies.

Initial-onset symptoms of preeclampsia and their relation to pregnancy outcomes

Preeclampsia (PE) is a serious gestational idiopathic hypertensive disease, threatening both maternal and foetal safety. As a systemic disease, the initial-onset symptoms (IOSs) and clinical manifestations of PE can vary widely from patient to patient. However, a lack of evidence-based data on IOS and their relationship to their corresponding clinical features and pregnancy outcomes persists. We hypothesised that there would be a significant difference between the morbidity time, subsequent organ dysfunction and the status of mother and foetus in PE patients with different IOS. Moreover, early identification of the characteristics of the PE patients with different IOS could improve pregnancy outcomes through individualised prevention or intervention. This study aimed to analyse maternal and foetal condition and pregnancy outcomes of PE patients with different IOS, and to explore the disease progression and characteristics of maternal and foetal outcomes for different IOS, so as to provide the basis for future maternal and foetal monitoring of PE patients.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? In 2013, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists revised their definition of PE, sparking a heated debate. Subsequently in 2015, China updated its guidelines to define PE as hypertensive pregnancy accompanied by involvement of any other organ or organ system, to include the heart, lungs, liver and kidneys, among others. However, IOS can be varied in PE, so the maternal management and foetal monitoring should be classified through different IOS. No evidence-based data on IOS in PE patients exist.What the results of this study add? Significant differences in mean morbidity times and mean delivery times were demonstrated among patients with different IOS; medians of the interval from morbidity to delivery were between 4 and 6 weeks. Significant differences in laboratory values were found in patients with different IOS. In patients that did not present with proteinuria as an IOS, 89.1% experienced proteinuria following diagnosis. Patients with the most severe complications presented with hypertension as an IOS. Follow-up visits demonstrated different foetal weight medians.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? IOS could be an indicator to help evaluate the potential for different maternal and foetal complications and PE outcomes. Moreover, the duration of treatment for PE maybe 4-6 weeks.