1
|
Patel BM, Khanna D, Khanna S, Hapshy V, Khanna P, Kahar P, Parmar MS. Effects of COVID-19 on Pregnant Women and Newborns: A Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e30555. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
2
|
Yefet E, Massalha M, Alter A, Gal Harnik A, Hosari Mahamed S, Novick L, Wattad M, Sakas J, Baram S, Weiss A, Iskander R, Peretz A, Rozenberg O, Younis JS, Perlitz Y, Nachum Z. Should pregnant women be screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection? A prospective multicenter cohort study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 160:161-166. [PMID: 35842225 PMCID: PMC9349848 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), ranges from asymptomatic to severe infection. We aimed to compare the prevalence of COVID-19 in asymptomatic pregnant versus nonpregnant women in order to establish recommendations for a COVID-19 screening strategy. METHODS A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted. Asymptomatic pregnant or nonpregnant women after March 2020 (the time when COVID-19 was first detected in north Israel) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using nasopharyngeal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test, anti-nucleocapsid IgG, and anti-spike IgG. Diagnosis was made if at least one test result was positive. Pregnant women were tested between 34 and 42 weeks, mostly at birth. RESULTS Among the 297 participating women, 152 were pregnant and 145 were nonpregnant. The prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 was similar between the groups (4 [2.6%] and 8 [5.5%], respectively; P = 0.2). All women with COVID-19 delivered healthy appropriate-for-gestational-age babies without malformations, at term. CONCLUSIONS The rate of asymptomatic COVID-19 in pregnant women is low and comparable to the rate among nonpregnant women. Pregnancy outcomes are favorable. Future screening programs should consider that one of 25 screened asymptomatic women will be positive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enav Yefet
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBaruch Padeh Medical Center Poriya, Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of MedicinePoriyaIsrael,Azrieli Faculty of MedicineBar‐Ilan UniversitySafedIsrael
| | - Manal Massalha
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyEmek Medical CenterAfulaIsrael,Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, TechnionHaifaIsrael
| | - Adi Alter
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBaruch Padeh Medical Center Poriya, Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of MedicinePoriyaIsrael
| | - Amit Gal Harnik
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBaruch Padeh Medical Center Poriya, Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of MedicinePoriyaIsrael
| | | | - Lia Novick
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBaruch Padeh Medical Center Poriya, Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of MedicinePoriyaIsrael
| | - Malak Wattad
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyEmek Medical CenterAfulaIsrael
| | - Jawad Sakas
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBaruch Padeh Medical Center Poriya, Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of MedicinePoriyaIsrael
| | - Shira Baram
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyEmek Medical CenterAfulaIsrael
| | - Amir Weiss
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyEmek Medical CenterAfulaIsrael,Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, TechnionHaifaIsrael
| | - Rula Iskander
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyEmek Medical CenterAfulaIsrael
| | - Avi Peretz
- Azrieli Faculty of MedicineBar‐Ilan UniversitySafedIsrael,Clinical Microbiology LaboratoryBaruch Padeh Medical Center Poriya, Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of MedicinePoriyaIsrael
| | | | - Johnny S. Younis
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBaruch Padeh Medical Center Poriya, Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of MedicinePoriyaIsrael,Azrieli Faculty of MedicineBar‐Ilan UniversitySafedIsrael
| | - Yuri Perlitz
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBaruch Padeh Medical Center Poriya, Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of MedicinePoriyaIsrael,Azrieli Faculty of MedicineBar‐Ilan UniversitySafedIsrael
| | - Zohar Nachum
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyEmek Medical CenterAfulaIsrael,Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, TechnionHaifaIsrael
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nair AV, Ramanathan S, Venugopalan P. Chest imaging in pregnant patients with COVID-19: Recommendations, justification, and optimization. Acta Radiol Open 2022; 11:20584601221077394. [PMID: 35284094 PMCID: PMC8905047 DOI: 10.1177/20584601221077394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Evaluation of COVID-19 related complication is challenging in pregnancy, due to concerns about ionizing radiation risk to mother and the fetus. Although there are instances when diagnostic imaging is clinically warranted for COVID-19 evaluation despite the minimal risks of radiation exposure, often there are concerns raised by the patients and sometimes by the attending physicians. This article reviews the current recommendations on indications of chest imaging in pregnant patients with COVID-19, the dose optimization strategies, and the risks related to imaging exposure during pregnancy. In clinical practice, these imaging strategies are key in addressing the complex obstetrical complications associated with COVID-19 pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Subramaniyan Ramanathan
- Department of Clinical Imaging, Al-Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - Prasanna Venugopalan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Travancore Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hashim NAF, Mahdy ZA, Abdul Rahman R, Kalok AHM, Sutan R. Universal Testing Policy for COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Front Public Health 2022; 10:588269. [PMID: 35211434 PMCID: PMC8861085 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.588269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread at an accelerated rate. WHO reported that in the general population, the majority are either asymptomatic or mildly infected. In view of the high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from a pregnant woman to her newborn, healthcare workers and other patients, it is a raised concern whether universal testing should be implemented in this targeted population. The current guidelines have not recommended a universal testing policy. In certain European countries, however, the policy was implemented by some hospitals in regions with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection. Aim(s) To assess the justification for universal screening of pregnant women for COVID-19 prior to admission in labor through systematic review of antenatal prevalence of asymptomatic infection, hence risk of inadvertent spread of infection. Materials and Methods Three databases confined to PubMed, Ovid and Science Direct were used to search for articles from November 2019 onwards published in the English language. The search was conducted using the keywords “COVID-19” or “coronavirus” or “SARS-CoV-2” and “pregnancy” or “pregnant” or “obstetric” or “labor” and “universal” or “testing” or “prevalence”. The review was registered with PROSPERO. Results The search result retrieved 34 studies, with the majority consisting of retrospective cohort studies, while other studies such as prospective cohort study, research letters and a case series were also identified. A total of 19,958 pregnant women were universally tested until the date of report. Overall, the prevalence of universal testing among pregnant women presenting to labor and delivery units are higher in Western regions. From the total number of pregnant women 5.3% tested positive and among these, the majority (75.5%) did not manifest any symptoms at the time of testing. Conclusion In areas with high prevalence of COVID-19 infection, the implementation of a universal testing policy among pregnant women presenting to labor and admission units may be cost effective in helping to curb disease transmission. Systematic Trial Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020184248, PROSPERO: CRD42020184248.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Amirah Farhanah Hashim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, Malaysia
| | - Zaleha Abdullah Mahdy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, Malaysia
| | - Rahana Abdul Rahman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, Malaysia
| | - Aida Hani Mohd Kalok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, Malaysia
| | - Rosnah Sutan
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heireman L, Baetens M, Menten B, Dehaene I, Padalko E. Comparison of the positivity rate of anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid SARS-CoV-2 IgG in asymptomatic pregnant women. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2021; 42:1541-1542. [PMID: 34958623 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1997960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L Heireman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Baetens
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - B Menten
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - I Dehaene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Padalko
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sah P, Fitzpatrick MC, Zimmer CF, Abdollahi E, Juden-Kelly L, Moghadas SM, Singer BH, Galvani AP. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2109229118. [PMID: 34376550 PMCID: PMC8403749 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2109229118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 247] [Impact Index Per Article: 82.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Quantification of asymptomatic infections is fundamental for effective public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Discrepancies regarding the extent of asymptomaticity have arisen from inconsistent terminology as well as conflation of index and secondary cases which biases toward lower asymptomaticity. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and World Health Organization Global Research Database on COVID-19 between January 1, 2020 and April 2, 2021 to identify studies that reported silent infections at the time of testing, whether presymptomatic or asymptomatic. Index cases were removed to minimize representational bias that would result in overestimation of symptomaticity. By analyzing over 350 studies, we estimate that the percentage of infections that never developed clinical symptoms, and thus were truly asymptomatic, was 35.1% (95% CI: 30.7 to 39.9%). At the time of testing, 42.8% (95% prediction interval: 5.2 to 91.1%) of cases exhibited no symptoms, a group comprising both asymptomatic and presymptomatic infections. Asymptomaticity was significantly lower among the elderly, at 19.7% (95% CI: 12.7 to 29.4%) compared with children at 46.7% (95% CI: 32.0 to 62.0%). We also found that cases with comorbidities had significantly lower asymptomaticity compared to cases with no underlying medical conditions. Without proactive policies to detect asymptomatic infections, such as rapid contact tracing, prolonged efforts for pandemic control may be needed even in the presence of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratha Sah
- Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520
| | - Meagan C Fitzpatrick
- Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
| | - Charlotte F Zimmer
- Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520
| | - Elaheh Abdollahi
- Agent-Based Modelling Laboratory, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - Lyndon Juden-Kelly
- Agent-Based Modelling Laboratory, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - Seyed M Moghadas
- Agent-Based Modelling Laboratory, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - Burton H Singer
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610
| | - Alison P Galvani
- Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A Comprehensive Analysis of Maternal and Newborn Disease and Related Control for COVID-19. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 3:1272-1294. [PMID: 33754135 PMCID: PMC7968576 DOI: 10.1007/s42399-021-00836-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The maternal-fetal/newborn unit is established at risk for COVID-19 infection. This narrative review summarizes the contemporary and cumulative publications which detail maternal infection, antenatal and newborn infections, and maternal/fetal/newborn management and prevention. There is a wide spectrum of maternal disease, but the potential for severe disease albeit in a minority is confirmed. COVID-19 carries risk for preterm delivery. Pregnant females can suffer multisystem disease, and co-morbidities play a significant role in risk. Congenital infection has been supported by several anecdotal reports, but strong confirmatory data are few. No typical congenital dysmorphisms are evident. Nevertheless, placental vascular compromise must be considered a risk for the fetus during advanced maternal infections. Clinical manifestations of newborn infection have been mild to moderate and relatively uncommon. Proven antiviral therapy is of yet lacking. The mode of delivery is a medical decision that must include patient risk assessment and patient directives. Both presymptomatic and asymptomatic mothers and offspring can complicate infection control management with the potential for spread to others in several regards. In the interim, infections of the maternal-fetal-newborn unit must be taken seriously both for the disease so caused and the potential for further dissemination of disease.
Collapse
|
8
|
Screening of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection during labor and delivery using polymerase chain reaction and immunoglobulin testing. Life Sci 2021; 271:119200. [PMID: 33577855 PMCID: PMC7871853 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Aims To assess severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during labor and delivery with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and using immunoglobulin G and M testing to correlate with maternal and perinatal outcomes. Main methods Pregnant women admitted for labor and delivery at two Spanish hospitals were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR test and by detection of serum immunoglobulins G and M. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared in women with laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with those with negative tests. Key findings Between March 31st and September 30th, 2020, 1211 pregnant women were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The prevalence of laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was 5.4% (n = 65), corresponding to (i) 22 ongoing infections at admission, including two with mild clinical symptoms and 20 asymptomatic women; (ii) 43 cases of previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure; (iii) and 1146 women who were negative for both SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serological test. None of the screened mothers required hospital admission for coronavirus disease before or after delivery, nor were any of the newborns admitted to the intensive care unit. All newborns from mothers with positive PCR on admission were PCR negative. There were no significant differences in maternal or perinatal outcomes among the three studied groups. Significance Ongoing or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection with asymptomatic or mild clinical symptoms detected during screening in pregnant women at labor and delivery do not have a higher rate of adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Immunological Changes in Pregnancy and Its Relation to COVID-19 Infection. COVID-19 INFECTIONS AND PREGNANCY 2021. [PMCID: PMC8298321 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-90595-4.00006-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This chapter describes the immunological adaptation to pregnancy. A special focus is drawn on the susceptibility to viral infections, especially COVID-19. Older literature refers to the pregnancy as an immunosuppressive state, while recent studies show an immunomodulation to adapt to the growing semiallograftic fetus. Despite this, pregnant women are not susceptible to all viral infections. Regarding influenza, pregnant women are not more susceptible to the infection, but more severe maternal courses. To prevent this, influenza vaccination is recommended for pregnant women. Based on the available evidence, pregnant patients are also not more susceptible to infection with regard to COVID-19 infection. Yet, more severe courses are described throughout gestation with the onset of obstetrical complications.
Collapse
|