Comparison of three different injection methods for arterial phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging of the liver

Reducing transient severe motion artifacts of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI by oxygen inhalation: effective for pleural effusion but not ascites

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of low-flow oxygen inhalation in mitigating transient severe motion (TSM) artifacts associated with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced hepatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Patients undergoing gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI were included. During the examination, the experimental group received oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula, while the control group did not. Images and TSM scores were evaluated and compared across precontrast, arterial, venous, and hepatobiliary phases. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the presence of pleural effusion or ascites.

RESULTS

A total of 325 patients were included. The motion scores were highest in the arterial phase and lowest in the hepatobiliary phase in both groups, but were significantly lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05). The incidence of TSM was significantly lower in the experimental group (3.29%) compared to the control group (13.29%, p = 0.01). While pleural effusion was associated with reduced image quality in both groups (p < 0.05), the image quality in the pleural effusion category was higher in the experimental group than in the control group. Oxygen inhalation showed limited efficacy in mitigating TSM related to ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-flow oxygen inhalation can effectively reduce the occurrence of gadoxetate disodium-related TSM. Pleural effusion may impair respiratory function and contribute to TSM, which can be alleviated by oxygen supplementation. However, Oxygen inhalation is less effective under the condition of ascites.

Intra-patient and inter-observer image quality analysis in liver MRI study with gadoxetic acid using two different multi-arterial phase techniques

PURPOSE

To evaluate intra-patient and interobserver agreement in patients who underwent liver MRI with gadoxetic acid using two different multi-arterial phase (AP) techniques.

METHODS

A total of 154 prospectively enrolled patients underwent clinical gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI twice within 12 months, using two different multi-arterial algorithms: CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and TWIST-VIBE. For every patient, breath-holding time, body mass index, sex, age were recorded. The phase without contrast media and the APs were independently evaluated by two radiologists who quantified Gibbs artefacts, noise, respiratory motion artefacts, and general image quality. Presence or absence of Gibbs artefacts and noise was compared by the McNemar's test. Respiratory motion artefacts and image quality scores were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Interobserver agreement was assessed by Cohen kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Compared with TWIST-VIBE, CAIPIRINHA-VIBE images had better scores for every parameter except higher noise score. Triple APs were always acquired with TWIST-VIBE but failed in 37% using CAIPIRINHA-VIBE: 11% have only one AP, 26% have two. Breath-holding time was the only parameter that influenced the success of multi-arterial techniques. TWIST-VIBE images had worst score for Gibbs and respiratory motion artefacts but lower noise score.

CONCLUSION

CAIPIRINHA-VIBE images were always diagnostic, but with a failure of triple-AP in 37%. TWIST-VIBE was successful in obtaining three APs in all patients. Breath-holding time is the only parameter which can influence the preliminary choice between CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and TWIST-VIBE algorithm.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

If the patient is expected to perform good breath-holds, TWIST-VIBE is preferable; otherwise, CAIPIRINHA-VIBE is more appropriate.

Influence of injection rate in determining the development of artifacts during the acquisition of dynamic arterial phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI studies

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether different Gd-EOB-DTPA injection rates could influence the development of artifacts during the arterial phase of liver MRI studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI studies performed for different clinical indications at a single tertiary referral center were retrospectively evaluated. Each examination was acquired on a 1.5 T scanner with T1 In- and Out-of-Phase, T2 with and without fat-saturation, DWI, and 3D-T1 fat-sat dynamic sequences. Patients were divided into two groups according to the injection rate (1 ml/s and 1.5 ml/s). A single radiologist recorded the presence or absence of artifacts during different acquisition phases, respectively: (1) all examination; (2) only during the arterial phase; (3) only during the portal-venous phase; (4) both in arterial and portal-venous phases. From a total of 748 MRI studies performed, 229 were excluded due to the presence of artifacts during the entire examination. The remaining 519 MRI studies were divided into two groups according to the injection rate.

RESULTS

The first group (flow rate = 1 ml/s) was composed by 312 (60.1%) patients and the second group (flow rate = 1.5 ml/s) by 207 (39.9%) patients. In the first group, 2 (0.6%) patients showed artifacts in all dynamic sequences; 13 (4%) only in the arterial phase, 16 (5%) only in the portal-venous phase, and 38 (12%) both in arterial and portal-venous phases; a total of 243 (78%) showed no artifacts. In the second group, 3 (1.5%) patients had artifacts in all dynamic sequences, 82 (40%) only in the arterial phase, 20 (10%) only in the portal-venous phase, and 53 (25%) both in arterial and portal-venous phases; a total of 49 (23.5%) showed no artifacts. A significant difference between the two groups regarding the absence of artifacts in all examination and the presence of artifacts only during the arterial phase was found (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The development of artifacts during the arterial phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI studies could be related to the injection rate and its reduction may help to decrease the incidence of artifacts.

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Assessment of arterial phase artifacts and hepatobiliary uptake in a large series

PURPOSE

To report the quality of gadoxetate disodium MRI in a large series by assessing the prevalence of: 1) arterial phase (AP) artifacts and its predictive factors, 2) decreased hepatic contrast uptake during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP).

METHODS

This retrospective single center study included 851 patients (M/F:537/314, mean age: 63y) with gadoxetate disodium MRI. The MRI protocol included unenhanced, dual arterial [early and late arterial phases (AP)], portal venous, transitional and hepatobiliary phases. Three radiologists graded dynamic images using a 5-scale score (1: no motion, 5: severe, nondiagnostic) for assessment of transient severe motion (TSM, defined as a score ≥4 during at least one AP with a score ≤3 during other phases). HBP uptake was assessed using a 3-scale score (based on portal vein/hepatic signal). The association between demographic, clinical and acquisition parameters with TSM was tested in uni- and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

TSM was observed in 103/851 patients (12.1 %): 83 (9.8 %) in one AP and 20 (2.3 %) in both APs. A score of 5 (nondiagnostic) was assigned in 7 patients in one AP (0.8 %) and none in both. Presence of TSM was significantly associated with age (p = 0.002) and liver disease (p = 0.033) in univariate but not in multivariate analysis (p > 0.05). No association was found between acquisition parameters and TSM occurrence. Limited or severely limited HBP contrast uptake was observed in 87 patients (10.2 %), and TSM was never associated with severely limited HBP contrast uptake.

CONCLUSION

TSM was present in approximately 12 % of gadoxetate disodium MRIs, rarely on both APs (2.3 %), and was poorly predicted. TSM was never associated with severely limited HBP contrast uptake.

Predictive factors of truncation artifacts in the arterial phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: a nationwide multicenter study

PURPOSE

To identify predictive factors for truncation artifacts (TAs) in the arterial phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in a multicenter study in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on patient factors (age, sex, weight, presence of viral hepatitis, and other conditions) and imaging parameters (e.g., triggering, voxel size, matrix, k-space ordering, acquisition time, reduction factor, flip angle, fat suppression, field strength, injection rate, and saline volume) were obtained. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the correlation of these parameters.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1444 patients from 43 institutions who were scanned using GE, Siemens, Philips, or Toshiba MRI equipment (501, 354, 349, and 240 patients, respectively). The total incidence of TAs was 12.5% (17.2, 3.6, 15.7, and 12.1%, respectively). The matrix [odds ratio (OR) 0.13], flip angle (OR 5.77), use of fat suppression (OR 0.106), and field strength (OR 0.092) used in the Philips equipment significantly increased the incidence of TAs in MRI examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of TAs in the arterial phase is influenced by several patient factors and imaging parameters. Especially, Siemens and Toshiba equipment had a significantly lower frequency of TAs. This indicates that such vendor-specific technology used in the dynamic sequence may have a TA-resistant effect.

Effect of Gadoxetic Acid Injection Duration on Tumor Enhancement in Arterial Phase Liver MRI

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Rapid injection of gadoxetic acid has been shown not to increase tumor enhancement in arterial phase liver MRI for unknown reasons. This study aimed to investigate the effect of injection durations on peak contrast concentration in tumors and to correlate it with signal enhancement in gadoxetic acid-enhanced arterial phase MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced arterial phase MRI was obtained using a bolus-tracking technique with injection durations of 1, 3, and 6s in six rabbits with VX2 liver tumors. The peak concentration of gadoxetic acid in the aorta and tumor was estimated by iopromide-enhanced time-resolved CT using the same injection volume and durations with those for MRI. Signal enhancement on MRI and peak enhancement on CT were compared and correlated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in MR signal enhancement of tumors among the 3 injection durations (p = 0.87). In CT, shorter injection durations significantly increased peak contrast concentration in the aorta (p < 0.01) but produced equivalent peak contrast concentration in tumors (p = 0.24). The longer injections resulted in the stronger correlation between peak contrast concentration in CT and MR signal enhancement in tumors (r = 0.31, 0.43, and 0.86 with 1s-, 3s-, and 6s-injection, respectively) with a statistical significance only found with 6s-injection (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Estimation of contrast concentration by CT demonstrated that shorter injections did not increase peak contrast concentration in tumors despite increased peak concentration in the aorta. Furthermore, tumor signal enhancement in gadoxetic acid-enhanced arterial phase MRI was less correlated with the peak contrast concentration with shorter injections.

[Examination of Gd-EOB-DTPA Liver Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Using Radial VIBE with k-space Weighted Image Contrast Method]

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic imaging (DCE-MRI) is a useful method for detection and diagnosis of liver lesions. However, DCE-MRI using Gd-EOB-DTPA has some problems with arterial phase images. Radial volumetric imaging breath-holding examination (r-VIBE) with k-space weighted image contrast reconstruction (KWIC), which is a modification of Cartesian VIBE (c-VIBE), is a new 3D-gradient echo sequence with a number of advantages compared with c-VIBE, including lower motion sensitivity. This study was performed to evaluate image contrast, blurring, and temporal phase division effects of r-VIBE in comparison with c-VIBE. Image contrast using diluted Gd-EOB-DTPA aqueous solution showed no significant difference between r-VIBE and c-VIBE. Imaging was performed with r-VIBE and c-VIBE during injection of a Gd-EOB-DTPA solution into a serpentine tube. r-VIBE showed a smaller half-width of the signal intensity profile of the tube and less image artifacts by blurring when compared to c-VIBE. The arrival times and durations of the maximum signal strengths of r-VIBE and c-VIBE images during injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA solution into the tube were almost identical. r-VIBE improved the temporal resolution without degradation of liver DCE-MRI using Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Gadoxetate-enhanced dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for evaluation of liver function and liver fibrosis in preclinical trials

Background

To facilitate translational drug development for liver fibrosis, preclinical trials need to be run in parallel with clinical research. Liver function estimation by gadoxetate-enhanced dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is being established in clinical research, but still rarely used in preclinical trials. We aimed to evaluate feasibility of DCE-MRI indices as translatable biomarkers in a liver fibrosis animal model.

Methods

Liver fibrosis was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats by thioacetamide (200 mg, 150 mg, and saline for the high-dose, low-dose, and control groups, respectively). Subsequently, DCE-MRI was performed to measure: relative liver enhancement at 3-min (RLE-3), RLE-15, initial area-under-the-curve until 3-min (iAUC-3), iAUC-15, and maximum-enhancement (Emax). The correlation coefficients between these MRI indices and the histologic collagen area, indocyanine green retention at 15-min (ICG-R15), and shear wave elastography (SWE) were calculated. Diagnostic performance to diagnose liver fibrosis was also evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

Animal model was successful in that the collagen area of the liver was the largest in the high-dose group, followed by the low-dose group and control group. The correlation between the DCE-MRI indices and collagen area was high for iAUC-15, Emax, iAUC-3, and RLE-3 but moderate for RLE-15 (r, − 0.81, − 0.81, − 0.78, − 0.80, and − 0.51, respectively). The DCE-MRI indices showed moderate correlation with ICG-R15: the highest for iAUC-15, followed by iAUC-3, RLE-3, Emax, and RLE-15 (r, − 0.65, − 0.63, − 0.62, − 0.58, and − 0.56, respectively). The correlation coefficients between DCE-MRI indices and SWE ranged from − 0.59 to − 0.28. The diagnostic accuracy of RLE-3, iAUC-3, iAUC-15, and Emax was 100% (AUROC 1.000), whereas those of RLE-15 and SWE were relatively low (AUROC 0.777, 0.848, respectively).

Conclusion

Among the gadoxetate-enhanced DCE-MRI indices, iAUC-15 and iAUC-3 might be bidirectional translatable biomarkers between preclinical and clinical research for evaluating histopathologic liver fibrosis and physiologic liver functions in a non-invasive manner.

Gadoxetate acid disodium-enhanced MRI: Multiple arterial phases using differential sub-sampling with cartesian ordering (DISCO) may achieve more optimal late arterial phases than the single arterial phase imaging

BACKGROUND

To prospectively determine whether the use of a multiple arterial phase imaging (DISCO) improve the capturing rate of late arterial phase with less motion artifact than single arterial phase obtained with gadoxetate acid disodium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 06/2017 to 10/2018, prospectively acquired data of 132 patients who underwent either single (n = 67) or multiple arterial phase (n = 65) gadoxetate acid-enhanced MR imaging were analyzed. Two readers independently assessed arterial phase timing and the degree of motion artifact using a five-point scale. The kappa test was used to determine the agreement between the two readers, χ2 or fisher exact test were used for the categorical variables and Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used for the comparison of the motion artifacts.

RESULTS

Good to perfect inter-observer agreement was obtained for the arterial phase timing and degree of motion artifact (all kappa value >0.70). Optimal timing of arterial phase was observed in 95.4% (62/65) of multiple arterial phase compared with 73.1% (49/67) of single arterial phase (χ2 = 12.209, p < 0.001). Motion artifact score of the late arterial phase images measured using single arterial phase acquisition (3.22 ± 0.68) was significantly higher than the multiple arterial phase (2.42 ± 0.74) group (t = 5.921, p < 0.001). For the multiple arterial phase comparison, motion artifact score of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th phases were also significant reduced compared with 1st, 5th and 6th phases (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of multiple arterial phase acquisition with gadoxetate acid disodium can improve the capturing rate of well-timed late arterial phase with less motion artifact.

Modified CAIPIRINHA-VIBE without view-sharing on gadoxetic acid-enhanced multi-arterial phase MR imaging for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE

PURPOSE

We evaluated the detection rate and degree of motion artifact of the modified CAIPIRINHA-VIBE (mC-VIBE) without view-sharing and compare them with the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE (CDT-VIBE) with view-sharing on multi-arterial gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI in the assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 114 pathological-proven hepatic tumors in 114 patients with risk of HCC who underwent multi-arterial gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI between June 2016 and June 2018. All patients underwent triple arterial phase imaging using the mC-VIBE without view-sharing (54 patients; 49 HCCs and 5 non-HCCs) or the CDT-VIBE with view-sharing (60 patients; 55 HCCs and 5 non-HCCs). We compared the detection rate of two sequences for HCC, with reference to LI-RADS.V.2017. We also compared the mean motion scores and proportions of transient severe motion (TSM) in two sequences.

RESULT

For the examination using the mC-VIBE, the HCC-detection rate was significantly higher, compared with that using CDT-VIBE (93.9% [46/49] vs 80.0% [44/55], respectively; p = 0.047). For the examination with the mC-VIBE, mean motion scores were significantly lower compared with those of CDT-VIBE for all multi-arterial phases (1.21, 1.19, and 1.15 vs. 1.82, 1.85, and 1.84, respectively; p < 0.001 for all three comparisons). The proportion of TSM in the CDT-VIBE was significantly higher than that in the mC-VIBE (15.0% [9/60] vs 0.0% [0/54], respectively; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

In multi-arterial phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, the mC-VIBE sequence without view-sharing has slightly higher HCC-detection rate and fewer motion artifacts compared with CDT-VIBE with view-sharing.

KEY POINTS

• Multi-arterial phase using the mC-VIBE without view-sharing can overcome motion artifacts, resulting in providing optimal arterial phase imaging. • The HCC-detection rate is slightly higher with the mC-VIBE vs. CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE with view-sharing (CDT-VIBE). • View-sharing of CDT-VIBE in the multi-arterial phase is associated with increased frequency of TSM.

Intra-individual comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MRI using pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of HCCs using LI-RADS

OBJECTIVES

To determine the usefulness of extracellular contrast agent (ECA)-enhanced multiphasic liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme by intra-individual comparison with gadoxetic acid-MRI (EOB-MRI) with regard to image quality and the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 15 patients with 18 HCCs who underwent EOB-MRI using a Cartesian approach and ECA-MRI using the pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme (free-breathing continuous data acquisition for 64 s following ECA injection, generating six images). Two reviewers evaluated the arterial and portal phases of each MRI for artifacts, organ sharpness, and conspicuity of intrahepatic vessels and the hepatic tumors. A Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category was also assigned to each lesion.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the subjective image quality analysis between the arterial phases of two MRIs (p > 0.05). However, ghosting artifact was seen only in EOB-MRI (N = 3). Six HCCs showed different signal intensities in the arterial phase or portal phase between the two MRIs; five HCCs showed arterial hyperenhancement on ECA-MRI, but not on EOB-MRI. The capsule was observed in 15 HCCs on ECA-MRI and 6 HCCs on EOB-MRI. Five and one HCC were assigned as LR-5 and LR-4 with ECA-MRI and LR-4 and LR-3 with EOB-MRI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Free-breathing ECA-enhanced multiphasic liver MRI using a pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition was more sensitive in detecting arterial hyperenhancement of HCC than conventional EOB-MRI, and the image quality was acceptable.

KEY POINTS

• The pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme can be applied to perform free-breathing multiphasic dynamic liver MRI. • Adopting the pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme can improve the detection of arterial enhancement of HCC. • The pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme enables motion-free liver MRI.

Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI-RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is being adapted by many clinical practices. To support continuation of its use, LI-RADS (LR) is in need of multicenter validation studies of recent LI-RADS iterations. Furthermore, while both gadoxetate and extracellular agents have been incorporated into LI-RADS, comparison of the diagnostic performance between the two has yet to be determined.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the rate, diagnostic performance, and interreader reliability (IRR) of LI-RADS 2017 for hepatocellular carcinoma, including LR major and ancillary features, with both gadoxetate and extracellular agent-enhanced MRI against a reference standard of histopathology or imaging follow-up.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

In all, 114 patients with 144 observations were included who met LR 2017 criteria for at risk and had at least one hepatic observation on liver MRI performed with either gadoxetate (n = 52) or an extracellular agent (n = 92) between 2010-2016, with histopathology (n = 103) or follow-up imaging (n = 41).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5 and 3.0T/T₁ -T₂ WI, diffusion-weighted imaging.

ASSESSMENT

Three radiologists independently assessed major/ancillary features and assigned overall LI-RADS category for every observation.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Diagnostic performance of LR5/TIV+LR5 for identifying hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was compared between contrast agents with a generalized estimating equation. Weighted kappa was performed for interrater reliability.

RESULTS

The frequency of HCCs among LR1, LR2, LR3, L4, LR5, LRTIV+LR5, and LRM observations were: 0% (all readers), 0-12.5%, 11.4-26.9%, 50-76%, 83.0-95.1%, 83.3-100.0%, and 45.0-65.0%, respectively. Sensitivity of LR5/LRTIV+LR5 for HCC was 59.7-71.4% and specificity 85.0-96.8%. LI-RADS specificity and positive predictive value for observations imaged with gadoxetate was higher than extracellular agent for the most inexperienced reader (R3) (P = 0.009-0.034). IRR for LI-RADS categorization was substantial (k = 0.661).

DATA CONCLUSION

Increasing numerical LI-RADS 2017 categories demonstrate a greater percentage of HCCs. LR5/TIV+LR5 demonstrates excellent specificity and fair sensitivity for HCC. MRI with gadoxetate in liver transplant candidates may be beneficial for less experienced readers, although further large-scale prospective studies are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e205-e215.

Experimental studies on artifacts and tumor enhancement on gadoxetic acid-enhanced arterial phase liver MRI in a rabbit VX2 tumor model

Background Rapid injection of gadoxetic acid is reported to produce more frequent artifacts and lower vascular enhancement on arterial phase liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, its effect on tumor enhancement and the mechanism of the artifacts remain unclear. Purpose To evaluate the effect of rapid injection of gadoxetic acid on artifacts and tumor enhancement during arterial phase liver MRI, and on arterial blood gases (ABGs) which may explain the cause of the artifacts. Material and Methods ABG analysis was performed in 13 free-breathing rabbits after rapid injection (1 mL/s; injection time = 0.6-0.8 s) of gadoxetic acid (0.025 mmol/kg). Dynamic liver MRI was performed in six anesthetized rabbits with VX2 tumors under a ventilation stoppage after rapid and slow injection (0.25 mL/s; injection time = 2.4-3.2 s) of gadoxetic acid. Artifacts and signal enhancement on arterial phase imaging were compared with those obtained after rapid injection of gadopentetic acid (Gd-DTPA, 0.1 mmol/kg) using a Friedman test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Results ABG analysis did not find any significant changes. Artifacts were not related to injection protocols ( P = 0.95). Aortic enhancement with slow injection of gadoxetic acid was significantly higher than that with rapid injection ( P < 0.05), and was comparable to that with Gd-DTPA injection. Tumor enhancement obtained with gadoxetic acid was not significantly different between rapid and slow injection, and was significantly lower than that with Gd-DTPA injection ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Rapid injection of gadoxetic acid did not affect ABGs and may not be the cause of the artifacts. It lowered vascular enhancement but not arterial tumor enhancement.

Transient severe motion in the arterial phase during gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging: evaluation of patients with multiple MR examinations

PURPOSE

To determine whether patients undergoing multiple gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) examinations who experienced transient severe motion (TSM) in the arterial phase were affected by the TSM noted in the first examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

214 patients who underwent three or more repeated gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging were retrospectively analyzed. Three radiologists scored all of the examinations demonstrating a motion artifact using a five-point rating scale. Risk factor analysis and comparison of TSM recurrence rates were performed in the whole study population as well as in a subpopulation of patients with TSM.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of TSM was 5.9% (54/922), which was observed in 40 patients. Thirty-two patients had one episode of TSM, and eight patients had recurrent TSM. Although TSM in the first examination increased the risk of recurrent TSM in the whole population (OR 24.45; P < 0.001), the incidence of recurrent TSM was low (2.4%, 22/922). On subpopulation analysis, TSM in the first examination did not influence recurrent TSM (OR 0.36; P = 0.250).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing multiple gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR examinations who experienced recurrent TSM were not affected by TSM in the first examination. Therefore, a single episode of TSM should not be considered a risk factor of recurrent TSM.

Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: 2016 Consensus Recommendations of the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses certain unique challenges beyond the scope of current guidelines. The regional heterogeneity of HCC in demographic characteristics, prevalence, surveillance, and socioeconomic status necessitates different treatment approaches, leading to variations in survival outcomes. Considering the medical practices in Korea, the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) study group for liver diseases has developed expert consensus recommendations for diagnosis of HCC by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with updated perspectives, using a modified Delphi method. During the 39th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of KSAR (2016), consensus was reached on 12 of 16 statements. These recommendations might serve to ensure a more standardized diagnosis of HCC by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Triple Arterial Phase MR Imaging with Gadoxetic Acid Using a Combination of Contrast Enhanced Time Robust Angiography, Keyhole, and Viewsharing Techniques and Two-Dimensional Parallel Imaging in Comparison with Conventional Single Arterial Phase

Objective

To determine whether triple arterial phase acquisition via a combination of Contrast Enhanced Time Robust Angiography, keyhole, temporal viewsharing and parallel imaging can improve arterial phase acquisition with higher spatial resolution than single arterial phase gadoxetic-acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and Methods

Informed consent was waived for this retrospective study by our Institutional Review Board. In 752 consecutive patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI, either single (n = 587) or triple (n = 165) arterial phases was obtained in a single breath-hold under MR fluoroscopy guidance. Arterial phase timing was assessed, and the degree of motion was rated on a four-point scale. The percentage of patients achieving the late arterial phase without significant motion was compared between the two methods using the χ² test.

Results

The late arterial phase was captured at least once in 96.4% (159/165) of the triple arterial phase group and in 84.2% (494/587) of the single arterial phase group (p < 0.001). Significant motion artifacts (score ≤ 2) were observed in 13.3% (22/165), 1.2% (2/165), 4.8% (8/165) on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd scans of triple arterial phase acquisitions and 6.0% (35/587) of single phase acquisitions. Thus, the late arterial phase without significant motion artifacts was captured in 96.4% (159/165) of the triple arterial phase group and in 79.9% (469/587) of the single arterial phase group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Triple arterial phase imaging may reliably provide adequate arterial phase imaging for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

Use of gadoxetate disodium for functional MRI based on its unique molecular mechanism

Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl dimeglumine (gadoxetate) is a recently developed hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast medium. Gadoxetate demonstrates unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, because its uptake in hepatocytes occurs via the organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) transporter expressed at the sinusoidal membrane, and its biliary excretion via the multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs) at the canalicular membrane. Based on these characteristics, gadoxetate-enhanced MRI can provide functional information on hepatobiliary diseases, including liver function estimation, biliary drainage evaluation and characterization of hepatocarcinogenesis. In addition, understanding its mode of action can provide an opportunity to use gadoxetate for cellular and molecular imaging. Radiologists and imaging scientists should be familiar with the basic mechanism of gadoxetate and OATP/MRP transporters.

Troubleshooting Arterial-Phase MR Images of Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced Liver

Gadoxetate disodium is a widely used magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent for liver MR imaging, and it provides both dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images. However, acquiring optimal arterial phase images at liver MR using gadoxetate disodium is more challenging than using conventional extracellular MR contrast agent because of the small volume administered, the gadolinium content of the agent, and the common occurrence of transient severe motion. In this article, we identify the challenges in obtaining high-quality arterial-phase images of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MR imaging and present strategies for optimizing arterial-phase imaging based on the thorough review of recent research in this field.

Transient respiratory motion artifact during arterial phase MRI with gadoxetate disodium: risk factor analyses

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to identify risk factors for arterial phase respiratory motion artifact in gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 220 consecutive patients who underwent 357 MRI examinations, including 68 patients who underwent multiple MRI examinations, with gadoxetate disodium between 2010 and 2013. The arterial phase timing was determined by a fluoroscopic-triggering method. T1-weighted unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images were reviewed to record respiratory motion artifact, which was graded on a 5-point scale. Arterial phase transient severe motion was considered to be present if the motion score was 4 or greater on the arterial phase images and if the motion scores were 2 or less on unenhanced and other contrast-enhanced images. Patient characteristics and risk factors (e.g., age, sex, weight, body mass index, medical and radiologic history, allergy to MRI and iodinated contrast agents, estimated glomerular filtration rate, Child-Pugh class, and findings on current MRI examinations) were recorded. We included a history of transient severe motion on prior MRI as a predictor variable. We performed univariable and multivariable analysis using the generalized estimated equations to adjust for clustering.

RESULTS

The incidence of transient severe motion was 12.9% (46/357). On univariable analysis, a history of transient severe motion (odds ratio [OR] = 3.31; p = 0.04) on prior MRI and allergy to iodinated contrast agent (OR = 3.03; p = 0.01) statistically significantly increased the incidence of transient severe motion for a given MRI examination. These associations were not seen on multivariable analysis (adjusted OR = 2.38 and p = 0.23 for a history of transient severe motion; adjusted OR = 1.93 and p = 0.23 for allergy to CT contrast agent).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of transient severe motion during arterial phase MRI with gadoxetate disodium is 12.9% and is poorly predicted on the basis of risk factors.

Consensus report from the 7th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objectives

Liver-specific MRI is a fast-growing field, with technological and protocol advancements providing more robust imaging and allowing a greater depth of information per examination. This article reports the evidence for, and expert thinking on, current challenges in liver-specific MRI, as discussed at the 7th International Forum for Liver MRI, which was held in Shanghai, China, in October 2013.

Methods

Topics discussed included the role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma and small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from small intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (in patients with chronic liver disease), the differentiation of low-grade dysplastic nodule (DN) from pre-malignant high-grade DN and early HCC, and treatment planning and assessment of treatment response for patients with HCC and colorectal liver metastasis. Optimization of the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocol to gain robust arterial and hepatobiliary phase images was also discussed.

Results and conclusions

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI demonstrates added value for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions and shows promise in a number of new indications, including regional liver functional assessment and patient monitoring after therapy; however, more data are needed in some areas, and further developments are needed to translate cutting-edge techniques into clinical practice.

Key Points

• Liver-specific MRI is a fast-growing field, with many technological and protocol advancements.

• Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI demonstrates value for detecting and characterizing focal liver lesions.

• Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI shows promise in regional functional assessment and patient monitoring.

• Further developments are needed to translate cutting-edge techniques into clinical practice.

CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development, growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging play critical roles in the diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The first article of this two-part review discusses key concepts of HCC development, growth, and spread, emphasizing those features with imaging correlates and hence most relevant to radiologists; state-of-the-art CT and MR imaging technique with extracellular and hepatobiliary contrast agents; and the imaging appearance of precursor nodules that eventually may transform into overt HCC.

Liver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging

Liver-specific magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agents are increasingly used in evaluation of the liver. They are effective in detection and morphological characterization of lesions, and can be useful for evaluation of biliary tree anatomy and liver function. The typical appearances and imaging pitfalls of various tumours at MR imaging performed with these agents can be understood by the interplay of pharmacokinetics of these contrast agents and transporter expression of the tumour. This review focuses on the applications of these agents in oncological imaging.

Time-intensity curve in the abdominal aorta on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with high temporal and spatial resolution: Gd-EOB-DTPA versus Gd-DTPA in vivo

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in the time-intensity curves (TICs) of the abdominal aorta on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) between Gd-DTPA and Gd-EOB-DTPA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers underwent DCE-MRI three times with the following protocol: group A, Gd-DTPA at an injection rate of 3 ml/s; group B, Gd-EOB-DTPA, 3 ml/s; group C, Gd-EOB-DTPA, 1.5 ml/s. Signal intensities (SIs) of the abdominal aorta were measured, and the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) was calculated. Time-to-CER curves were compared among the three groups. The differences in maximum CER (CERmax) and time-to-peak of CER were analyzed.

RESULTS

The time-to-CER curve showed a double peak pattern in group A and single-peak pattern in groups B and C. The mean time between the first and the second peak was 6.2 s. The mean CERmax of each group was 4.50, 4.52 and 4.27, respectively. In group A, B and C, the mean time-to-peak was 14.6, 10.6 and 12.6 s, respectively. There was a significant difference between group A and B (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

To set up the optimal protocol for abdominal DCE-MRI, it should be noted that TIC in the Gd-DTPA and Gd-EOB-DTPA group showed different patterns, and a slower injection rate showed a less abrupt SI change in the Gd-EOB-DTPA group than in the Gd-DTPA group.