Lymphvascular space involvement compromises the survival of patients with stage I endometrial cancer: Results of a multicenter study

Prognostic evaluation of lymph-vascular space invasion in patients with endometrioid and non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic value of lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) on endometrial cancer (EC) remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the impact of LVSI on patients with endometrioid and non-endometrioid EC in China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed EC patients who underwent surgery from 2010 to 2019 in seven Chinese hospitals retrospectively and stratified patients based on histopathologic types and LVSI status. Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) algorithm was used to balance the confounding factors. The survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to find prognostic independent risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 3715 EC patients, LVSI positive rate was 9.31% (346/3715). After matching, LVSI present group had shorter DFS (P = 0.005), and similar OS (P = 0.656) than LVSI absent group for endometrioid EC patients. For non-endometrioid EC patients, there was no statistical difference in either DFS (P = 0.536) or OS (P = 0.512) after matching. The multivariate Cox analysis showed that LVSI was an independent risk factor of DFS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.62, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.35-5.10, P = 0.005] and not OS (HR 1.24, 95%CI 0.49-3.13, P = 0.656) for endometrioid EC patients. It was not a prognostic factor of either DFS (HR 1.28, 95%CI 0.58-2.81, P = 0.539) or OS (HR 1.33, 95%CI 0.55-3.13, P = 0.515) for non-endometrioid EC patients.

CONCLUSION

LVSI is an adverse prognostic factor for endometrioid EC patients and has no impact on non-endometrioid EC patients. Necessity of postoperative adjuvant therapy based on LVSI needs to be carefully considered for non-endometrioid EC patients.

Evaluation of prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion in early stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Studies evaluating the prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in early stage endometrial cancer (EC) are conflicting.

Objectives

To evaluate whether LVSI identified in stage I EC is associated with worse survival.

Search strategy

A comprehensive literature search of three databases (Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane) was performed up to April 30th 2023.

Selection criteria

Cohort studies that have evaluated the relationship between LVSI and prognosis in patients with stage I EC were included.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, extracted the data of recurrence and survival, and conducted meta-analysis using random effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated by I2 test.

Main results

A total of 15 studies involving 6,705 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled rate of LVSI was 14% [95% confidence interval (CI) CI 0.09-0.18] in stage I EC. LVSI was significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence [odds ratio (OR) = 2.79, 95%CI 2.07-3.77], reduced overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR)=5.19, 95%CI 3.33-8.07] and recurrence free survival (RFS) [HR = 5.26, 95%CI 3.45-8.02] in stage I EC patients. Similarly, LVSI was associated with an increased risk of recurrence [OR= 3.10, 95%CI 2.13-4.51], decreased OS [HR=5.52, 95%CI 2.16-14.09] and RFS [HR = 4.81, 95%CI 2.34-9.91] in stage IA grade 1 or 2 endometrioid carcinoma patients.

Conclusion

The presence of LVSI in stage I EC and in stage IA, grade 1 or 2 endometrioid carcinoma is associated with an increased risk of recurrence, lower OS and RFS.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier 42023425231.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessing lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) status of endometrial cancer (EC) has guiding significance in lymph node dissection. However, LVSI can only be obtained after surgery. Researchers have tried to extract the information of LVSI using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of preoperative MRI to predict the LVSI status of EC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search was conducted by using the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Articles were included according to the criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. A bivariate random effects model was used to obtain pooled summary estimates, heterogeneity, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A subgroup analysis was performed to identify sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of nine articles (814 patients) were included. The risk of bias was low or unclear for most studies, and the applicability concerns were low or unclear for all studies. The summary AUC values as well as pooled sensitivity and specificity of LVSI status in EC were 0.82, 73%, and 77%, respectively. According to the subgroup analysis, radiomics/non-radiomics features, country/region, sample size, age, MR manufacturer, magnetic field, scores of risk bias, and scores of applicability concern may have caused heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed that MRI has moderate diagnostic efficacy for LVSI status in EC. Large-sample, uniformly designed studies are needed to verify the true value of MRI in assessing LVSI.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of early stage endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

No consensus exists on the adjuvant chemotherapy for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage I-II endometrial cancer with risk factors for recurrence. This study evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy's efficacy in improving these patients' survival.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with FIGO Stage I-II endometrial cancer with recurrence risk factors. The patients received no adjuvant therapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) but received platinum-based chemotherapy at Shiga University of Medical Science (SUMS).

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty-eight patients with endometrial cancer were identified. Of these, 118 met the inclusion criteria, 321 were excluded from NCCH, while 49 met the inclusion criteria, and 150 were excluded from SUMS. Multivariate analyses of age, surgery, para-aortic lymphadenectomy, omentectomy, histological type, myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, and adjuvant therapy revealed that in patients aged > 60 years with type II histology, the outer half of myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, and positive peritoneal cytology had significantly worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates, and patients aged > 60 years with type II histology, outer half of myometrial invasion, and positive peritoneal cytology had significantly worse overall survival (OS) rates. Patients that received adjuvant chemotherapy showed equivalent effects on RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82-5.53) and worse on OS ([HR = 5.20; 95 %CI = 1.26-21.50) than patients who did not.

CONCLUSION

This study did not show that adjuvant chemotherapy for FIGO Stages I-II endometrial cancer with recurrence risk factors has survival benefit. Further large-scale studies are necessary to validate our findings.

[Molecular-integrated risk profile: An opportunity for therapeutic de-escalation in intermediate and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer]

In Europe, endometrial cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women. The majority of patients are diagnosed at a localized stage. For these patients, the standard of care is based on an hysterectomy with salpingo oophorectomy±lymph node staging. Through the assessment of histopathologic features, risk groups are determined: low, intermediate, high-intermediate, and high risk. Adjuvant strategies are guided by these risk groups. While the prognosis of low-risk and high-risk is well known, that of intermediate and high-intermediate risk is more heterogeneous, and the therapeutic index of adjuvant treatments is more questionable. Several trials (PORTEC [Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma] I, GOG [Gynecologic Oncology Group] 99, ASTEC [A Study in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer] EN.5, PORTEC II, Sorbe et al trial) have assessed observation, vaginal cuff brachytherapy and/or pelvic external beam radiotherapy in this population. Vaginal cuff brachytherapy reduces the local recurrence rate, and pelvic external beam radiotherapy the pelvic recurrence rate. However, no benefit in terms of overall survival or occurrence of distant metastases is highlighted. Compared to observation, brachytherapy and above all external beam radiotherapy are associated with an increased morbidity, and with a decreased quality of life. In order to improve the therapeutic ratio and to optimize medico-economic decisions, therapeutic de-escalation strategies, based on the molecular profiles, are emerging in clinical trials, and in the recommendations for the management of intermediate and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancers. The four main molecular profiles highlighted by the genomic analyzes of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) - POLE (polymerase epsilon) mutation, non-specific molecular profile, MMR (MisMatch repair) deficiency, and p53 mutation - but also the quantification of lymphovascular space invasion (absent, focal or substantial), and the assessment of L1CAM (L1 cell adhesion molecule) overexpression represent growing concerns. Thus, the use of molecular-integrated risk profile to determine the best adjuvant treatment represent a major way to personalize adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancers, with therapeutic de-escalation opportunity for around half of the high-intermediate risks. However, in the absence of prospective data, inclusion in clinical trials assessing molecular profile-based treatment remains the best therapeutic opportunity.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma with lymph-vascular invasion

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate if addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to radiation therapy improves overall survival in patients with high-intermediate risk stage I endometrial carcinoma with lymphovascular invasion.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2015 with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma with lymphovascular invasion who underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy and met the GOG-99 criteria for high-intermediate risk were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (administered within 6 months of surgery) and had at least 1 month of follow-up were selected for further analysis. Overall survival was compared with the log-rank test following stratification by type of radiation treatment. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 2881 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified; 2417 (83.9%) patients received radiation therapy alone while 464 (16.1%) received chemoradiation. Rate of adjuvant chemotherapy administration was comparable between patients who received vaginal brachytherapy alone (16.2%), and external beam radiation therapy (with or without vaginal brachytherapy) (15.8%), p=0.78. Rate of chemoradiation was higher for patients with grade 3 (28.8%) tumors compared with those with grade 2 (9.9%) and grade 1 (8.3%) tumors, p<0.001. After controlling for confounders for patients receiving external beam radiation, addition of chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.46). For patients receiving vaginal brachytherapy addition of chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.644, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.92). Benefit was limited to patients with grade 3 tumors, p=0.026; 4-year overall survival rate was 81.1% versus 74.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with high-intermediate risk FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion, addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy was associated with a survival benefit for patients with grade 3 tumors receiving vaginal brachytherapy.

Volumetric ADC histogram analysis for preoperative evaluation of LVSI status in stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of volumetric ADC histogram metrics for evaluating lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) status in stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC).

METHODS

Preoperative MRI of 227 patients with stage I EAC were retrospectively analyzed. ADC histogram data were derived from the whole tumor with ROIs drawn on all slices of DWI scans (b = 0, 1000 s/mm²). The Student t-test was performed to compare ADC histogram metrics (minADC, maxADC, and meanADC; 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of ADC; skewness; and kurtosis) between the LVSI-positive and LVSI-negative groups, as well as between stage Ia and Ib EACs. ROC curve analysis was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ADC histogram metrics in predicting LVSI status in EAC.

RESULTS

The minADC and meanADC and 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of ADC were significantly lower in LVSI-positive EACs compared with those in the LVSI-negative groups for stage I, Ia, and Ib EACs (all p < 0.05). MeanADC ≤ 0.857 × 10^-3 mm²/s, meanADC ≤ 0.854 × 10^-3 mm²/s, and the 90th percentile of ADC ≤ 1.06 × 10^-3 mm²/s yielded the largest AUC of 0.844, 0.844, and 0.849 for evaluating LVSI positivity in stage I, Ia, and Ib tumors, respectively, with sensitivity of 75.4%, 75.0%, and 76.2%; specificity of 80.0%, 83.1%, and 82.1%; and accuracy of 79.3%, 81.5%, and 79.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Volumetric ADC histogram metrics might be helpful for the preoperative evaluation of LVSI status and personalized clinical management in patients with stage I EAC.

KEY POINTS

• Volumetric ADC histogram analysis helps evaluate LVSI status preoperatively. • LVSI-positive EAC is associated with a reduction in multiple volumetric ADC histogram metrics. • MeanADC and the 90th percentile of ADC were shown to be best in evaluating LVSI- positivity in stage Ia and Ib EACs, respectively.

Absence of prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in patients with endometrial cancer and negative sentinel lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if the prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is different in endometrial cancer patients with negative lymph nodes following sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping or lymph node dissection (LND) as staging procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 510 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma in our institution between 2007 and 2014. We excluded patients that were diagnosed with positive nodes (Stage IIIc). We compared patients' characteristics and survival outcomes as function of their LVSI status (positive LVSI vs negative LVSI subgroups) in each cohort separately.

RESULTS

413 patients met the inclusion criteria, out of whom 239 underwent SLN and 174 patients underwent LND only. In the SLN group, life table analysis showed 5-year OS and PFS of 80% and 72% in patients with LVSI compared to 96%, and 93% without LVSI. Same trend was observed among patients with LND with 5-year OS and PFS of 74% and 64% in patients with LVSI compared to 97%, and 90% without LVSI. On multivariable analysis, adjusted for age, FIGO stage, grade and maximal tumor size, the favorable survival of negative LVSI remained only in the LND cohort (SLN cohort: HR 1.2, CI [0.3-4.0], P = 0.8 and HR 1.7, CI [0.7-4.3], p = 0.2 for OS and PFS, respectively; LND cohort: HR 3.1, CI [1.4-6.5], p < 0.001 and HR 2.5, CI [1.2-4.9], p = 0.01 for OS and PFS, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic value of LVSI disappears when patients undergo staging with SLN and are found to have negative nodes in contrast to those who have undergone LND. Future studies should confirm our observation on patients with negative sentinel nodes, and plan on tailoring adjuvant treatment to this specific subgroup.

The TCGA Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer and Its Possible Impact on Adjuvant Treatment Decisions

Simple Summary

The Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) is a recently developed tool to identify four distinct molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer. Patients identified as Polymerase Epsilon exonuclease domain mutated (POLE EDM) or p53-mutated have significantly altered prognosis compared to patients allocated to the mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) or p53 wt groups. The aim of this review is to give a broad overview over the initial development and refinement of the classifier as well as possible effects on the recommended adjuvant treatment. We have summarized the clinical data of 8 studies including 3650 endometrial cancer patients and analyzed the distribution of tumor stage and adjuvant treatment received in respect to the molecular subgroups. Based on the findings of the summarized studies treatment de-escalation might be feasible for POLE EDM patients while p53 abn patients should receive adjuvant (chemo-)radiotherapy.

Abstract

Adjuvant treatment decisions for endometrial cancer (EC) are based on stage, the histological grade of differentiation, histological subtype, and few histopathological markers. The Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) identified four risk groups of EC patients using a combination of immunohistochemistry and mutation analysis: Polymerase Epsilon exonuclease domain mutated (POLE EDM), mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53 wild-type/copy-number-low (p53 wt), and p53-mutated/copy-number-high (p53 abn). Patients allocated to the POLE or abnormal p53 expression subtype are faced with a significantly altered outcome possibly requiring a modified adjuvant treatment decision. Within this review, we summarize the development of ProMisE, characterize the four molecular subtypes, and finally discuss its value in terms of a patient-tailored therapy in order to prevent significant under or overtreatment.

Recurrence risk factors in stage IA grade 1 endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with early-stage endometrial cancers (EC) with disease recurrences have worse survival outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and pathologic factors that predict for all recurrences in stage IA grade 1 (IAG1) EC.

METHODS

Records from patients diagnosed with EC were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics of 222 patients with IAG1 EC who underwent surgical resection were analyzed. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify univariate and multivariate risk factors that predict for recurrence.

RESULTS

Seventeen (7.65%) patients had recurrences. The 3-year cumulative incidence of recurrence were significantly higher for patients with time from biopsy to surgery ≥6 months (54% vs. 8%, p=0.003), simple hysterectomy with ovarian preservation vs. total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (31% vs. 9%, p=0.032), any myometrial invasion vs. no invasion (18% vs. 2%, p=0.004), and tumor size ≥2 cm (15% vs. 2%, p=0.021). On, multivariate analysis, any myometrial invasion, increasing time from biopsy to surgery, and larger tumor size were independent predictors of any recurrence. Patients with recurrences had worse outcomes than those without (5-year overall survival [OS]=60%; 95% confidence interval [CI]=16%-86% vs. 5-year OS=95%; 95% CI=87%-99%, respectively, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Time from biopsy to surgery, larger tumors, and myometrial invasion are the most important predictors of recurrence. Though the recurrence rates are generally low in IAG1 EC, the survival rate for the patients with recurrences was worse than those without. Identification of additional recurrence risk factors can help select patients who may benefit from adjuvant treatment.

Clinical relevance of high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer according to European risk classification

OBJECTIVE

Risk models in endometrial cancer define prognosis and indicate adjuvant therapy. One of the currently used classifications was designed in 2016 in collaboration with the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO), and the European Society of Radiotherapy (ESTRO). A high-intermediate risk group was introduced within the intermediate risk group. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of this subclassification.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was carried out at five international tertiary institutions. Patients diagnosed with intermediate risk endometrial cancer on the basis of definitive pathology findings were included. Patients were stratified into intermediate and high-intermediate risk groups. Incidence of nodal metastases, and disease free and overall survival were compared between the two risk groups in univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

477 patients were included: 325 (68%) patients were identified as intermediate and 152 (32%) as high-intermediate endometrial cancer patients. Nodal metastases were found in 18 patients (11.8%) in the high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer group and 16 patients (4.9%) in the intermediate risk group. Lymphovascular space invasion was found to be a strong predictive factor of lymph node involvement. High-intermediate risk was found to be an independent factor of disease free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 3.08; p=0.050) and overall survival (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.10 to 3.60; p=0.022) in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The study validates the clinical significance of the intermediate risk endometrial cancer subclassification. Prognosis for high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer was significantly poorer. The prevalence of lymph node metastases was higher in this group of patients.

Is the risk of substantial LVSI in stage I endometrial cancer similar to PORTEC in the North American population? - A single-institution study

OBJECTIVES

A pooled analysis of PORTEC-1 & 2 identified substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in 4.8% of patients, which predicted for pelvic recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival. Our institution implemented the PORTEC three-tier system of LVSI reporting (absent, focal, or substantial). We aimed to quantify the incidence of substantial LVSI in a North American population and to correlate extent of LVSI with lymph node (LN) involvement.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on patients with clinically uterine-confined, endometrioid type endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging and were found to have pT1a-b disease. Binary logistic regression was used to assess predictors of LN involvement (defined as ITC, micrometastases, or macrometastases).

RESULTS

In total, 438 patients with pT1a-b disease were identified. In the overall cohort and in the subset meeting PORTEC-1 inclusion criteria (n = 195), no LVSI was present in 67.4% and 50.8%; focal LVSI was present in 16.7% and 24.1%; and substantial LVSI was present in 16.0% and 25.1%, respectively. Among patients who underwent surgical LN assessment (79.2%, n = 347), LNs were involved in 3.3% without LVSI, 7.5% with focal LVSI (OR 2.4), and 15.2% with substantial LVSI (OR 5.3) (p = .005), with a similar trend in the PORTEC-1 cohort. Extent of LVSI correlated with disease burden in LN metastases.

CONCLUSION

Our incidence of substantial LVSI was three to five times higher than reported by PORTEC and correlated with LN involvement. This questions the reproducibility of the three-tier LVSI reporting system and emphasizes the need for multi-institutional data outside PORTEC for confirmation of our findings.

Factors predicting recurrence in patients with stage IA endometrioid endometrial cancer: what is the importance of LVSI?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to define the clinical and pathological prognostic factors for recurrence and to evaluate the recurrence patterns and adjuvant therapies used in this group of patients with stage IA endometrioid type endometrial cancer (FIGO 2009-International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics).

METHODS

Among the patients with epithelial endometrial cancer operated between January 1993 and May 2013 in a single institution, 720 patients with stage IA endometrioid endometrial cancer were included. Patients with a tumor type of serous, clear cell, mucinous, undifferentiated, and mixed type and with a tumor containing sarcomatous component and the patients with a secondary primer cancer were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) was present in 60 (8.3%) patients. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 266 (36.9%) patients. Median follow-up time was 48 months (range 3-240). Recurrence occurred in 23 (3.4%) patients and 6 (0.9%) died of disease. The median time-to recurrence (TTR) was 24 months (range 4-52 months) in the patients with recurrence. LVSI was associated with recurrence in the univariate analysis. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) decreased from 96.8 to 80.1% in the presence of LVSI (p < 0.001). This association could not be shown in patients who had had lymphadenectomy (p = 0.136). Extra-pelvic recurrence occurred in 6.7% and 1% of the patients with and without LVSI, respectively, (p = 0.001). Any independent prognostic factor could not be detected in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Only LVSI and tumor grade were associated with DFS and disease-specific survival (DSS), respectively, in the 686 patients with stage IA endometrial cancer in the univariate analysis, since these associations could not be shown in multivariate analysis.

Impact of vaginal brachytherapy in intermediate and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer: a multicenter study from the FRANCOGYN group

Objective

According to recent European Society of Medical Oncology, European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines, adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (VB) is optional in patients with intermediate risk (IR) and high-intermediate risk (HIR) endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of this French retrospective, multicenter study was to assess the impact of VB in these groups on local recurrence rate, local recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Methods

Data of 191 patients with IR and HIR EC who underwent primary surgery with or without VB and no other adjuvant treatment between 2000 and 2016 were extracted from the FRANCOGYN database. Rate of local recurrence, OS and local RFS in these two groups were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

The number of patients with IR and HIR EC were 118 and 73 respectively. VB was used in 92 patients in IR group and 43 in HIR group. Median follow-up was 22 months. In the HIR group, the local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the no adjuvant therapy group in comparison with the VB group (16.7% and 0% respectively, p=0.02). There was also a significant improvement in local RFS (p=0.01) in VB group. In IR EC, there is no significant difference on local recurrence rate (4.2% and 3.2%, respectively, p=1.00) or local RFS (p=0.54) between the two groups.

Conclusions

VB is an efficient adjuvant treatment for patients with HIR EC. VB is not associated with an improvement of RFS or OS in IR EC patient.

Intrauterine Manipulator Use During Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Risk of Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine an association between intrauterine manipulator (IUM) use and frequency of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in women with endometrial cancer undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted among stage I-IV endometrial cancer patients who underwent hysterectomy between 2008 and 2015. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical details, and tumor characteristics. Women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with IUM use were compared with women who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Review of archived medical record for data collection and propensity score matching were performed to adjust for background differences between TLH-IUM and TAH groups. A systematic literature review with pooled analysis was performed to examine frequency of LVSI.

RESULTS

There were 687 women who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Of those, 419 women underwent TLH with IUM use and 194 women underwent TAH. The most common type of IUM was VCare (89.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of LVSI between the 2 groups: 15.1% for TLH-IUM vs 19.9% for TAH (P = 0.14). After propensity score matching, frequencies of LVSI were similar between the 2 groups: 21.2% for TLH-IUM vs 19.6% for TAH (P = 0.78). Systematic literature review identified 1371 cases of TLH-IUM and 1246 cases of TAH performed for endometrial cancer, and frequencies of LVSI were similar between the 2 groups (15.0% vs 13.6%, P = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that IUM use during TLH for endometrial cancer is not associated with increased frequency of LVSI.

A novel prediction score for predicting the baseline risk of recurrence of stage I-II endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a 3-year recurrence prediction score (RPS) system for predicting the baseline risk of recurrence of stage I-II endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

We reviewed 427 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging I-II endometrial carcinoma underwent surgery without any adjuvant therapy from 2005 to 2013. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the test cohort (n=251) comprising those who underwent surgery in odd-numbered years, and the validation cohort (n=176) comprising those who underwent surgery in even-numbered years. Multivariate analysis was performed using 7 candidate predictors to identify the risk factors for 3-year recurrence-free interval (RFI) in the test cohort. Each risk factor was scored based on logistic regression analyses of the test data set, and the sum of the risk factor scores was defined as the RPS system. We then applied the system in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that the significant risk factors were age ≥60 years, pathological type II, positive cervical stromal invasion, and positive peritoneal cytology. In the test cohort, the 3-year RFI rates were 100%, 95.8%, 79.9%, and 33.3% for RPSs of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In the validation cohort, the 3-year RFI was significantly higher in the low-RPS group (RPS 0 or 1) than in the high-RPS group (RPS 2 or 3) (95.2% vs. 79.9%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The RPS system shows significant reproducibility for predicting the baseline risk of recurrence. The system could potentially impact the choice of adjuvant therapy for stage I-II endometrial carcinoma.

The Impact of Lymphovascular Space Invasion on Recurrence and Survival in Iranian Patients With Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) on recurrence and survival in early stage of endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods

Patients with EC referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran were examined and enrolled over a 10-year period (2004 - 2015). The effect of LVSI on recurrence and overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test methods.

Results

A total of 160 patients with early stage EC were identified. Out of 160 women with EC, 135 (84.4%) underwent primary surgery. One hundred and twenty-one (76.2%) patients were not found to have LVSI, whereas 38 (23.8%) were found to have LVSI. Of the 38 patients with LVSI, 21 (55.3%) had endometrioid cell type tumor, 10 (26.3%) had serous, one (2.6%) had clear cell and six (15.8%) had adeno-squamous cell type tumor.

Conclusion

The presence of LVSI represents a factor strongly associated with high risk of recurrence and poor survival in early stage EC. Patients with lower International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stages may be at increased risk of recurrence and a poor overall survival if the pathological findings confirm the presence of LVSI. Thus, LVSI should be added to the traditional factors used to decide whether patients with early stage EC are at high risk of recurrence and adjuvant therapy planning.

Magnitude of risk for nodal metastasis associated with lymphvascular space invasion for endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

While lymphvascular space invasion (LVSI) is a risk factor for nodal metastasis in endometrial cancer, the magnitude of risk is poorly described. We examined the risk of nodal metastasis associated with LVSI for various combinations of tumor grade and depth of invasion and examined the effect of LVSI on survival.

METHODS

We identified patients with T1A (<50% myoinvasion) and T1B (>50% myoinvasion) endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the endometrium diagnosed between 2010 and 2012 and recorded in the National Cancer Database. The risk of nodal metastasis associated with LVSI stratified by grade and stage is reported. The association of LVSI and survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We identified 25,907 patients, including 3928 (15.2%) with LVSI. Among patients with LVSI, 21.0% had positive lymph nodes, compared to 2.1% in patients without LVSI (P<0.0001). In analyses stratified by stage and grade, LVSI was associated with increased risks of LN metastasis by a magnitude of 3 to over 10-fold. In a multivariable model controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics, the risk ratio of nodal disease with LVSI was 9.29 (95% CI, 7.29-11.84) for T1A tumors and 4.64 (95% CI 3.99-5.39) for T1B tumors. LVSI was associated with decreased survival even after adjustment for the presence of lymph node metastases (HR=1.92, 95% CI 1.56-2.36).

CONCLUSIONS

LVSI is independently associated with lymph node metastases in women with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer and an independent predictor of survival even after adjustment for the presence of lymph node metastases.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

Lymphovascular space invasion and the treatment of stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of clinical early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) in The Netherlands consists of primary hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy is given when 2 or more the following risk factors are present: 60 years or older, grade 3 histology, and 50% or more myometrial invasion. Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is a predictor of poor prognosis and early distant spread. It is unclear whether adjuvant radiotherapy is sufficient in patients with LVSI-positive EEC.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Eighty-one patients treated from 1999 until 2011 for stage I LVSI-positive EEC in 11 Dutch hospitals were included. The outcomes of patients with 0 to 1 risk factors were compared with those with 2 to 3 risk factors, and both were compared with the known literature.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients presented with recurrent disease, and 12 of those recurrences had a distant component. Overall and distant recurrence rates were 19.2% and 11.5% in patients with 0 to 1 risk factors followed by observation and 25.5% and 17% in patients with 2 to 3 risk factors who received adjuvant radiotherapy. Only 1 patient with grade 1 disease had a recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In stage I LVSI-positive EEC with 0 to 1 risk factors, observation might not be adequate. Moreover, despite adjuvant radiotherapy, a high overall and distant recurrence rate was observed in patients with 2 to 3 risk factors. The use of systemic treatment in these patients, with the exception of patients with grade 1 disease, should be investigated.

Staging for endometrial cancer: The controversy around lymphadenectomy - Can this be resolved?

Endometrial cancer remains the most common malignancy of the female genital tract. Lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors, and stratification into pelvic lymph node invasion (stage IIIC1) and para-aortic lymph node invasion (stage IIIC2) improved the predictive value of the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification. Radiological examination methods such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography do not have good-enough sensitivity to avoid lymphadenectomy for the assessment of lymph node invasion. Prediction scores are becoming increasingly valuable to exclude lymph node metastasis in low-risk groups, and biomarkers could help to identify patients with high-risk lymph node metastatic probability. The therapeutic role of lymph node dissection remains a matter of debate. Several end points can be considered to evaluate the opportunity of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. First, we compare survival according to the realization, the extent, and the numbers of nodes removed during lymphadenectomy. Second, we assess the opportunity of lymphadenectomy in order to tailor adjuvant treatment modalities. Third, we analyze the surgical complication rate after pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion and nodal involvement in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer patients treated with curative intent using surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess whether lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and nodal status provide adequate prognostic information in comparison with the entire set of traditional prognostic factors in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer patients treated and staged with primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-four previously untreated high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage I to IIIC; endometrioid, serous, or clear cell histology; diagnosed between November 1995 and December 2006; who presented to Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre for adjuvant radiotherapy were included in these analyses. All traditionally recognized prognostic factors and newly created 4 pairs of combination of LVSI and nodal status were studied with respect to survival and patterns of failure.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 4.8 years. Five-year failure-free survival for all patients according to FIGO stage I, II, and III were 87.4%, 89.0%, and 62.4 %, respectively. In multivariable analysis for relapse, positive LVSI had a hazard ratio of 4.9 (P = 0.000), which increased to 8.8 (P = 0.004) in the presence of positive nodes. For overall survival, only LVSI was significant, with a hazard ratio of 3.02 (P = 0.003). In particular, in the presence of LVSI and nodes, histological type, grade, and myometrial invasion were not significant prognosticators for relapse or overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This model enables the separation of good prognosis patients even among poorly differentiated endometrioid, serous, and clear cell carcinoma patients and can be used in simplifying the staging of endometrial cancer and for selecting patients for high-risk endometrial cancer studies.

[Sentinel node procedure and endometrial cancer: senti-endo results]

Based on two randomized trials and a meta-analysis, the recommendations of the National Cancer Institute (INCa) have validated the absence of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with endometrial cancer at low risk (type 1 histology stage IA grade 1-2) and intermediate (type 1 histology stage IA grade 3 and IB grade 1-2) but without taking into account the contribution of the sentinel node (SN) procedure. The senti-endo trial assessing the role of the SN procedure in patients with early stages endometrial cancer showed that the detection rate by hemi-pelvis right and left were 77 and 76%, respectively. The detection rate per patient was 89%. Among patients with at least a SN detected, the detection was unilateral in 34 cases (31%) and bilateral in 77 cases (69%). Of the 111 patients with at least a SN detected, 19 had lymph node metastases (17%). Considering the hemi-pelvis right and left as a unit, no false negative case was observed, hence the sensitivity and NPV was 100%. Considering the NPV per patient, three false negative cases were observed. Among the 57 patients at low risk, six (11%) had lymph node metastases on SN with negative non sentinel nodes. Of the 33 patients at intermediate risk, five (15%) had lymph node metastases on SN with negative non sentinel nodes. Senti-endo results emphasize the contribution of the SN procedure to assess the nodal status in patients with low or intermediate risk group raising the issue on new definition of the recommendations of INCa.

Steroid receptors, HER2/neu and Ki-67, in endometrioid type of endometrial carcinoma: Correlation with conventional histomorphological features of prognosis

Endometrial proliferation is regulated by steroid receptors such as estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha), estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) and progesterone receptor (PR). HER2/neu is an important growth factor receptor which affects cell proliferation and Ki67 is a marker of cellular proliferation. Their interaction in endometrioid type of endometrial carcinoma is still not fully understood. In this study, we analyzed the immunolocalisation of ERalpha and ERbeta with particular attention to the ERbetacx isoform, PR, HER2/neu and Ki67 in endometrioid carcinoma. Their correlations with each other and with the conventional morphological prognostic parameters of myoinvasion and tumor grade were analyzed with respect to overall survival. Out of a total 54 cases, 14 showed evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease within 5 years with poor outcome, whereas the rest had no evidence of disease. ERalpha, ERbeta, ERbetacx, PR, HER2/neu and Ki67 were detected using immunohistochemistry. The histological grade of the tumor correlated inversely with the intensity of immunolabelling of ERalpha and PR, and this was highly significant. The depth of myoinvasion showed an inverse correlation only with the ERbeta2/betacx immunopositivity and was not significantly associated with any other receptor evaluated. Analysis of the inter-relationship between receptor immunopositivity revealed a significant association of ERalpha immunolocalisation with ERbeta and with PR. Immunodetection of HER2/neu receptor correlated positively with both ERalpha and PR immunolabelling. The Ki-67 proliferation index correlated only with ERalpha immunopositivity. Preliminary observations suggested that with the exception of ERalpha, there was no correlation of any of the receptors evaluated with survival.

The Grading of Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma

Introduction:

To assess the prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Methods:

We reexamined single representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of 66 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma to identify LVSI. A 4-grade system was used to classify LVSI: absent (no LVSI), mild (1-2 foci of LVSI), moderate (3-8 foci of LVSI), and severe (≥9 foci of LVSI). We investigated the possible associations between the grade of LVSI and clinicopathologic factors.

Results:

Lymphovascular space invasion was present in 36 patients (54.5%) and absent in 30 (45.5%). Statistical analysis indicated that LVSI was significantly associated with advanced clinical stage, poor histological grade, and lymph node metastasis. Follow-up studies indicated that the disease-free survival time for patients without LVSI was significantly longer than that for patients with moderate LVSI (P = 0.01) and severe LVSI (P = 0.001). The overall survival (OS) time for patients with moderate or severe LVSI was significantly shorter than that for patients with mild or no LVSI. The grade of LVSI was found to be significantly associated with OS (P = 0.004). The grade of LVSI showed poor correlation with disease-free survival and OS.

Conclusions:

The grade of LVSI is an important predictive factor for disease recurrence and poor survival of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Transection of vaginal cuff is an independent prognostic factor in stage I endometrial cancer

AIMS

The objective was to identify prognostic factors of disease-free and overall survival in stage I endometrial carcinoma, thereby potentially facilitating the selection of patients who are on high risk for recurrence and who may benefit from transection of a vaginal cuff.

METHODS

In a retrospective review between 1994 and 2004, 340 patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma were managed surgically at two different hospitals in Rostock. The median follow-up was 79 (range 12-161) months. Clinical and histological parameters were compared using the SPSS software package.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis the factors associated with poor disease-free survival in stage I carcinoma were higher tumor grade (P=0.013), and no removed vaginal cuff (P=0.025). The corresponding factor for impaired overall survival was no removed vaginal cuff (P=0.003). All parameters with a P-value<0.25 in the univariate setting were entered into a multivariate analysis. The factors that maintained associated with poor disease-free and overall survival were higher tumor grade and lack of vaginal cuff.

CONCLUSIONS

The removal of a vaginal cuff during abdominal hysterectomy was found to be an independent prognostic factor in stage I endometrial carcinomas. A prospective surgical trial is needed to validate our results before changing current clinical practice.