1
|
Perri G, van Hilst J, Li S, Besselink MG, Hogg ME, Marchegiani G. Teaching modern pancreatic surgery: close relationship between centralization, innovation, and dissemination of care. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad081. [PMID: 37698977 PMCID: PMC10496870 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic surgery is increasingly moving towards centralization in high-volume centres, supported by evidence on the volume-outcome relationship. At the same time, minimally invasive pancreatic surgery is becoming more and more established worldwide, and interest in new techniques, such as robotic pancreatoduodenectomy, is growing. Such recent innovations are reshaping modern pancreatic surgery, but they also represent new challenges for surgical training in its current form. METHODS This narrative review presents a chosen selection of literature, giving a picture of the current state of training in pancreatic surgery, together with the authors' own views, and in the context of centralization and innovation towards minimally invasive techniques. RESULTS Centralization of pancreatic surgery at high-volume centres, volume-outcome relationships, innovation through minimally invasive technologies, learning curves in both traditional and minimally invasive surgery, and standardized training paths are the different, but deeply interconnected, topics of this article. Proper training is essential to ensure quality of care, but innovation and centralization may represent challenges to overcome with new training models. CONCLUSION Innovations in pancreatic surgery are introduced with the aim of increasing the quality of care. However, their successful implementation is deeply dependent on dissemination and standardization of surgical training, adapted to fit in the changing landscape of modern pancreatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giampaolo Perri
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shen Li
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of HPB Surgery, NorthShore Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thobie A, Bouvier AM, Bouvier V, Jooste V, Queneherve L, Nousbaum JB, Alves A, Dejardin O. Survival variability across hospitals after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A multilevel survival analysis on a high-resolution population-based study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1450-1456. [PMID: 37055280 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Resection is the cornerstone of curative management for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Hospital surgical volume influence post-operative mortality. Few is known about impact on survival. METHODS Population included 763 patients resected for PDAC within the 4 French digestive tumor registries between 2000 and 2014. Spline method was used to determine annual surgical volume thresholds influencing survival. A multilevel survival regression model was used to study center effect. RESULTS Population was divided into three groups: low-volume (LVC) (<41 hepatobiliary/pancreatic procedures/year), medium-volume (MVC) (41-233) and high-volume centers (HVC) (>233). Patients in LVC were older (p = 0.02), had a lower rate of disease-free margins (76.7% vs. 77.2% and 69.5%, p = 0.028) and a higher post-operative mortality than in MVC and HVC (12.5% and 7.5% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.004). Median survival was higher in HVC than in other centers (25 vs. 15.2 months, p < 0.0001). Survival variance attributable to center effect accounted for 3.7% of total variance. In multilevel survival analysis, surgical volume explained the inter-hospital survival heterogeneity (non-significant variance after adding the volume to the model p = 0.3). Patients resected in HVC had a better survival than in LVC (HR 0.64 [0.50-0.82], p < 0.0001). There was no difference between MVC and HVC. CONCLUSION Regarding center effect, individual characteristics had little impact on survival variability across hospitals. Hospital volume was a major contributor to the center effect. Given the difficulty of centralizing pancreatic surgery, it would be wise to determine which factors would indicate management in a HVC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Thobie
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital of Avranches-Granville, Avranches, France; UMR INSERM 1086 'ANTICIPE', Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
| | - Anne-Marie Bouvier
- Registre des cancers digestifs de Bourgogne, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France; INSERM UMR 1231, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Véronique Bouvier
- UMR INSERM 1086 'ANTICIPE', Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Registre des cancers digestifs du Calvados, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France; Department of Research, Epidemiology Research and Evaluation Unit, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | - Valérie Jooste
- Registre des cancers digestifs de Bourgogne, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France; INSERM UMR 1231, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Lucille Queneherve
- Registre des cancers digestifs du Finistère, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France; EA7479 SPURBO, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Nousbaum
- Registre des cancers digestifs du Finistère, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France; EA7479 SPURBO, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France
| | - Arnaud Alves
- UMR INSERM 1086 'ANTICIPE', Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Registre des cancers digestifs du Calvados, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France; Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | - Olivier Dejardin
- UMR INSERM 1086 'ANTICIPE', Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Department of Research, Epidemiology Research and Evaluation Unit, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seufferlein T, Mayerle J, Böck S, Brunner T, Ettrich TJ, Grenacher L, Gress TM, Hackert T, Heinemann V, Kestler A, Sinn M, Tannapfel A, Wedding U, Uhl W. S3-Leitlinie zum exokrinen Pankreaskarzinom – Langversion 2.0 – Dezember 2021 – AWMF-Registernummer: 032/010OL. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:e812-e909. [PMID: 36368658 DOI: 10.1055/a-1856-7346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stefan Böck
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Universitätsklinikum München, Germany
| | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Thomas Mathias Gress
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Endokrinologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie Universitätsklinikum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Klinikum der Universität München-Campus Grosshadern, München, Germany
| | | | - Marianne Sinn
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II Onkologie Hämatologie, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Waldemar Uhl
- Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St Josef-Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
King D, Kamran U, Dosanjh A, Coupland B, Mytton J, Leeds JS, Nayar M, Patel P, Oppong KW, Trudgill NJ. Rate of pancreatic cancer following a negative endoscopic ultrasound and associated factors. Endoscopy 2022; 54:1053-1061. [PMID: 35359019 DOI: 10.1055/a-1784-1661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Data are limited regarding pancreatic cancer diagnosed following a pancreaticobiliary endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) that does not diagnose pancreatic cancer. We have studied the frequency of, and factors associated with, post-EUS pancreatic cancer (PEPC) and 1-year mortality. METHODS : Between 2010 and 2017, patients with pancreatic cancer and a preceding pancreaticobiliary EUS were identified in a national cohort using Hospital Episode Statistics. Patients with a pancreaticobiliary EUS 6-18 months before a later pancreatic cancer diagnosis were the PEPC cases; controls were those with pancreatic cancer diagnosed within 6 months of pancreaticobiliary EUS. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the factors associated with PEPC and a Cox regression model examined factors associated with 1-year cumulative mortality. RESULTS : 9363 pancreatic cancer patients were studied; 93.5 % identified as controls (men 53.2 %; median age 68 [interquartile range (IQR) 61-75]); 6.5 % as PEPC cases (men 58.2 %; median age 69 [IQR 61-77]). PEPC was associated with older age (≥ 75 years compared with < 65 years, odds ratio [OR] 1.42, 95 %CI 1.15-1.76), increasing co-morbidity (Charlson co-morbidity score > 5, OR 1.90, 95 %CI 1.49-2.43), chronic pancreatitis (OR 3.13, 95 %CI 2.50-3.92), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.58, 95 %CI 1.31-1.90). Metal biliary stents (OR 0.57, 95 %CI 0.38-0.86) and EUS-FNA (OR 0.49, 95 %CI 0.41-0.58) were inversely associated with PEPC. PEPC was associated with a higher cumulative mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio 1.12, 95 %CI 1.02-1.24), with only 14 % of PEPC patients (95 %CI 12 %-17 %) having a surgical resection, compared with 21 % (95 %CI 20 %-22 %) of controls. CONCLUSIONS : PEPC occurred in 6.5 % of patients and was associated with chronic pancreatitis, older age, more co-morbidities, and specifically diabetes mellitus. PEPC was associated with a worse prognosis and lower surgical resection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic King
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Umair Kamran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Amandeep Dosanjh
- Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ben Coupland
- Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jemma Mytton
- Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - John S Leeds
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Manu Nayar
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Prashant Patel
- Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kofi W Oppong
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Nigel J Trudgill
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, West Bromwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Logan K, Pearson F, Kenny RP, Pandanaboyana S, Sharp L. Are older patients less likely to be treated for pancreatic cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 80:102215. [PMID: 35901624 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the seventh commonest cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Although prognosis is poor, both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy improve survival. However, it has been suggested that not all pancreatic cancer patients who may benefit from treatment receive it. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the existence of age-related inequalities in receipt of first-line pancreatic cancer treatment. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and grey literature were searched for population-based studies investigating treatment receipt, reported by age, for patients with primary pancreatic cancer from inception until 4th June 2020, and updated 5th August 2021. Studies from countries with universal healthcare were included, to minimise influence of health system-related economic factors. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken comparing likelihood of treatment receipt in older versus younger patients. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Eighteen papers were included; 12 independent populations were eligible for meta-analysis. In most studies, < 10% of older patients were treated. Older age (generally ≥65) was significantly associated with reduced receipt of any treatment (OR=0.14, 95% CI 0.10-0.21, n = 12 studies), surgery (OR=0.15, 95% CI 0.09-0.24, n = 9 studies) and chemotherapy as a primary treatment (OR=0.13, 95% CI 0.07-0.24, n = 5 studies). The effect of age was independent of methodological quality, patient population or time-period of patient diagnosis and remained in studies with confounder adjustment. The mean quality score of included studies was 6/8. Inequalities in receipt of healthcare interventions across social groups is a recognised concern internationally. This review shows that older age is significantly, and consistently, associated with non-receipt of treatment in pancreatic cancer. However, there are risks and side-effects associated with pancreatic cancer treatment. Further research on what influences patient and professional treatment decision-making is required to better understand these apparent inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty Logan
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Pearson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan Pw Kenny
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom; HPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ratnayake B, Pendharkar SA, Connor S, Koea J, Sarfati D, Dennett E, Pandanaboyana S, Windsor JA. Patient volume and clinical outcome after pancreatic cancer resection: A contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2022; 172:273-283. [PMID: 35034796 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer remains a highly fatal disease with a 5-year overall survival of less than 10%. In seeking to improve clinical outcomes, there is ongoing debate about the weight that should be given to patient volume in centralization models. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the relationship between patient volume and clinical outcome after pancreatic resection for cancer in the contemporary literature. METHODS The Google Scholar, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from February 2015 until June 2021 for articles reporting patient volume and outcomes after pancreatic cancer resection. RESULTS There were 46 eligible studies over a 6-year period comprising 526,344 patients. The median defined annual patient volume thresholds varied: low-volume 0 (range 0-9), medium-volume 9 (range 3-29), high-volume 19 (range 9-97), and very-high-volume 28 (range 17-60) patients. The latter 2 were associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality (P < .001), 90-day mortality (P < .001), overall postoperative morbidity (P = .005), failure to rescue rate (P = .006), and R0 resection rate (P = .008) compared with very-low/low-volume hospitals. Centralization was associated with lower 30-day mortality in 3 out of 5 studies, while postoperative morbidity was similar in 4 out of 4 studies. Median survival was longer in patients traveling greater distance for pancreatic resection in 2 out of 3 studies. Median and 5-year survival did not differ between urban and rural settings. CONCLUSION The contemporary literature confirms a strong relationship between patient volume and clinical outcome for pancreatic cancer resection despite expected bias toward more complex surgery in high-volume centers. These outcomes include lower mortality, morbidity, failure-to-rescue, and positive resection margin rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bathiya Ratnayake
- Surgical and Translational Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand; HBP/Upper GI Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. https://twitter.com/ProfJohnWindsor
| | - Sayali A Pendharkar
- Surgical and Translational Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Saxon Connor
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jonathan Koea
- Upper GI Unit, Northshore Hospital, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Diana Sarfati
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Cancer Control Agency, Te Aho O Te Kahu, Ministry of Health, New Zealand
| | - Elizabeth Dennett
- Cancer Control Agency, Te Aho O Te Kahu, Ministry of Health, New Zealand
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - John A Windsor
- Surgical and Translational Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand; HBP/Upper GI Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Concin N, Planchamp F, Abu-Rustum NR, Ataseven B, Cibula D, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Knapp P, Marth C, Morice P, Querleu D, Sehouli J, Stepanyan A, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zapardiel I, Persson J. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1508-1529. [PMID: 34795020 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care. OBJECTIVE In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs. RESULTS Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria .,Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial Sloann Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pawel Knapp
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Oncology Center of Bialystok, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Alsace, France
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Artem Stepanyan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Nairi Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, VKV American Hospital, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thobie A, Mulliri A, Bouvier V, Launoy G, Alves A, Dejardin O. Same Chance of Accessing Resection? Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Resection Rates Among Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma-A Systematic Review. Health Equity 2021; 5:143-150. [PMID: 33778318 PMCID: PMC7990568 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2019.0099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The incidence of pancreatic cancer is growing and the survival rate remains one of the worst in oncology. Surgical resection is currently a crucial curative option for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). Socioeconomic factors could influence access to surgery. This article reviews the literature on the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on access to curative surgery among patients with PA. Methods: The EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched by three investigators to generate 16 studies for review. Results: Patients with the lowest SES are less likely to undergo surgery than high SES. Low income, low levels of education, not being insured, and living in deprived and rural areas have all been associated with decreased rates of surgical resection. Given the type of health care system and geographic disparities, results in North American populations are difficult to transpose to European countries. However, a similar trend is observed in difficulty for the poorest patients in accessing resection. Low SES seems to be less likely to be offered surgery and more likely to refuse it. Conclusions: Inequalities in insurance coverage and living in poor/lower educational level areas are all demonstrated factors of a lower likelihood of resection populations. It is important to assess the causal effect of socioeconomic deprivation to improve understanding of this disease and improve access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Thobie
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France.,UMR INSERM 1086 UCN 'ANTICIPE,' Caen, France
| | - Andrea Mulliri
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France
| | - Véronique Bouvier
- UMR INSERM 1086 UCN 'ANTICIPE,' Caen, France.,Registre des Tumeurs Digestives du Calvados, Caen, France.,Department of Research, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France
| | - Guy Launoy
- UMR INSERM 1086 UCN 'ANTICIPE,' Caen, France.,Registre des Tumeurs Digestives du Calvados, Caen, France.,Department of Research, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France
| | - Arnaud Alves
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France.,UMR INSERM 1086 UCN 'ANTICIPE,' Caen, France.,Registre des Tumeurs Digestives du Calvados, Caen, France.,Department of Research, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France
| | - Olivier Dejardin
- UMR INSERM 1086 UCN 'ANTICIPE,' Caen, France.,Department of Research, University Hospital of Caen, Caen Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Disparities in access to health care system as determinant of survival for patients with pancreatic cancer in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Sci Rep 2021; 11:6346. [PMID: 33737639 PMCID: PMC7973503 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85759-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Little is known about the features and outcomes of Brazilian patients with pancreatic cancer. We sought to describe the socio-economic characteristics, patterns of health care access, and survival of patients diagnosed with malignant pancreatic tumors from 2000 to 2014 in São Paulo, Brazil. We included patients with malignant exocrine and non-classified pancreatic tumors according to the International Classifications of Disease (ICD)-O-2 and -O-3, diagnosed from 2000 to 2014, who were registered in the FOSP database. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in the subgroup of patients with ductal or non-specified (adeno)carcinoma were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard model. The study population consists of 6855 patients. Median time from the first visit to diagnosis and treatment were 13 (Interquartile range [IQR] 4-30) and 24 (IQR 8-55) days, respectively. Both intervals were longer for patients treated in the public setting. Median OS was 4.9 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.7-5.2). Increasing age, male gender, lower educational level, treatment in the public setting, absence of treatment, advanced stage, and treatment from 2000 to 2004 were associated with inferior OS. From 2000-2004 to 2010-2014, no improvement in OS was seen for patients treated in the public setting. Survival of patients with malignant pancreatic tumors remains dismal. Socioeconomical variables, especially health care funding, are major determinants of survival. Further work is necessary to decrease inequalities in access to medical care for patients with pancreatic cancer in Brazil.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ahola R, Sand J, Laukkarinen J. Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery Improves Results: Review. Scand J Surg 2020; 109:4-10. [DOI: 10.1177/1457496919900411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aims: The effect of operation volume on the outcomes of pancreatic surgery has been a subject of research since the 1990s. In several countries around the world, this has led to the centralization of pancreatic surgery. However, controversy persists as to the benefits of centralization and what the optimal operation volume for pancreatic surgery actually is. This review summarizes the data on the effect of centralization on mortality, complications, hospital facilities used, and costs regarding pancreatic surgery. Materials and Methods: A systematic librarian-assisted search was performed in PubMed covering the years from August 1999 to August 2019. All studies comparing results of open pancreatic resections from high- and low-volume centers were included. In total 44, published articles were analyzed. Results: Studies used a variety of different criteria for high-volume and low-volume centers, which hampers the evaluating of the effect of operation volume. However, mortality in high-volume centers is consistently reported to be lower than in low-volume centers. In addition, failure to rescue critically ill patients is more common in low-volume centers. Cost-effectiveness has also been evaluated in the literature. Length of hospital stay in particular has been reported to be shorter in high-volume centers than in low-volume centers. Conclusion: The effect of centralization on the outcomes of pancreatic surgery has been under active research and the beneficial effect of it is associated especially with better short-term prognosis after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Ahola
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - J. Sand
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - J. Laukkarinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Homeyer RS, Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP, Kaltenborn A, Mirza D, Qu Z, Klempnauer J, Schrem H. Ventilation after pancreaticoduodenectomy increases perioperative mortality: Identification of risk factors and their relevance in Germany that do not apply in England. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2019; 18:379-388. [PMID: 31122750 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2019.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-operative risk factors for post-operative ventilation and their influence on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy are unknown. METHODS Totally 391 patients operated in Hannover, Germany were investigated with multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression modeling to identify independent risk factors for post-operative ventilation ≥6 h, patient survival and 90-day mortality. And 84 patients operated in Birmingham, United Kingdom were analyzed to assess the external relevance of findings. RESULTS Longer operations, history of thrombosis, intra-operative blood transfusion, lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) and higher values of the age at operation divided by the Horovitz Quotient independently increased the risk of post-operative ventilation ≥ 6 h in German patients (n = 108; 27.6%) (P<0.050). Blood transfusion and lower pre-operative eGFR levels increased the risk of early death in German patients significantly and independently of established prognostic factors. A history of thrombosis and lower eGFR levels were also independent significant risk factors for 90-day mortality in German patients but not in English patients. None of the English patients received post-operative ventilation. Significantly more German patients were >75 years, had a history of thrombosis, received blood transfusions, and had significantly worse lung function parameters. pT4 tumors were detected in 18 German patients (4.6%), but not in the English patients. CONCLUSIONS Identified risk factors for post-operative ventilation are clinically relevant in Germany but not in England and may be used to lower mortality risk. The German and the English cohorts displayed significant differences in the approach to patient selection and early post-operative extubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rieke-Sophie Homeyer
- Core Facility Quality Management Transplantation, Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Kaltenborn
- Core Facility Quality Management Transplantation, Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Zhi Qu
- Core Facility Quality Management Transplantation, Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Jürgen Klempnauer
- General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Harald Schrem
- Core Facility Quality Management Transplantation, Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University Graz, Auenbrugger Platz 5, 8036 Graz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
White KM, Seale H, Harrison R. Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:296. [PMID: 30866891 PMCID: PMC6416902 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6633-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical variation in ovarian cancer care has been reported internationally. Using Wennberg’s classification of clinical variation as effective care we can conceptualise variation through deviation from clinical guidelines. The aim of this review was to address knowledge gaps in the effectiveness of attempts to reduce unwarranted clinical variation through addressing the following questions: What is the evidence of guideline adherence in ovarian cancer and its deviation?; what are the key factors associated with variation in guideline adherence in ovarian cancer care?; and what quality improvement approaches have been used and what is the evidence of their effectiveness in enhancing guideline adherence in ovarian cancer care?. Methods Keywords and synonyms for the major concepts of ovarian cancer, guideline adherence and safety were developed and combined to form the search strategy. Systematic searches of four electronic databases were undertaken of publications from January 2007 to November 2018. Retrieved articles were assessed against the eligibility criteria to determine those for inclusion. Results Thirty-two papers were included in the review with three broad groupings identified: adherence to and deviation from guidelines (either local, national or international guidelines); factors impacting guidelines adherence; and quality improvement approaches. Conclusions Unwarranted clinical variation may be used as a marker for the effectiveness of a health system, based on the outcome of this systematic review. This review found that the implementation of quality indicators through a formal quality improvement program lead to improvements in guideline adherent care. Further research on outcomes of implementing quality improvement programs in ovarian cancer care will improve the ability to implement centralised care and further identify factors that to improve outcomes in ovarian cancer care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6633-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kahren M White
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. .,Cancer Institute NSW, PO Box 41, Alexandria, NSW, 1435, Australia.
| | - Holly Seale
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Reema Harrison
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu Z, Peneva IS, Evison F, Sahdra S, Mirza DF, Charnley RM, Savage R, Moss PA, Roberts KJ. Ninety day mortality following pancreatoduodenectomy in England: has the optimum centre volume been identified? HPB (Oxford) 2018; 20:1012-1020. [PMID: 29895441 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality following pancreatoduodenectomy is related to centre volume although the optimal volume is not defined. METHODS Patients undergoing PD between 2001 and 2016 were identified from UK national databases. The effects of patient variables, centre volume and time period upon 90 day mortality were studied. RESULTS 90 day mortality (970/14,935, 6.5%) was related to advanced age, comorbidity, diagnosis, ethnicity, deprivation, centre volume and time period. Mortality rates fell markedly from 10.0% in 2001-4 to 4.1% in 2013-16. There was no difference in 90 day mortality between high (36 -60 PD per year) and very high volume (>60) centres. However, patients operated upon at very high volume centres were more elderly (66, 58 -73 vs 65, 56 -72; median, IQR; p = 0.006), deprived (38.7 vs 34.6%; p < 0.001) and co morbid (48.9 vs 46.1%; p = 0.027). CONCLUSION Although a plateau in the centre volume and mortality relationship appears to have been demonstrated those patients treated at the highest volume centres were at higher risk of mortality. This data suggests therefore that to further understand outcomes from specialist centres characteristics of the patient population should be defined, not just centre volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Liu
- Depts of Statistics and Mathematics for Real World Systems CDT, University of Warwick, UK
| | - I S Peneva
- Depts of Statistics and Mathematics for Real World Systems CDT, University of Warwick, UK
| | - F Evison
- Department of Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham, UK
| | - S Sahdra
- Department of Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham, UK
| | - D F Mirza
- Department of HPB & Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, UK
| | - R M Charnley
- Department of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - R Savage
- Depts of Statistics and Mathematics for Real World Systems CDT, University of Warwick, UK
| | - P A Moss
- School of Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - K J Roberts
- Department of HPB & Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cowan RA, Tseng J, Ali N, Dearie H, Murthy V, Gennarelli RL, Iasonos A, Abu-Rustum NR, Chi DS, Long Roche KC, Brown CL. Exploring the impact of income and race on survival for women with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing primary debulking surgery at a high-volume center. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 149:43-48. [PMID: 29605049 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2017] [Revised: 11/03/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC) undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) at a high-volume center (HVC), to determine whether socio-demographic disparities in PDS outcome and overall survival (OS) were present. METHODS All patients with stages IIIB-IV high-grade OC undergoing PDS at our institution from 1/2001-12/2013 were identified. Patients self-identified race/ethnicity as non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Asian (A), or Hispanic (H). Income level for the entire cohort was estimated using the census-reported income level for each patient's zip code as a proxy for SES. Main outcome measures were PDS outcome and median OS. Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine differences in OS by racial/ethnic and income category, controlling for selected clinical factors. RESULTS 963 patients were identified for analysis: 855 NHW; 43 A, 34H, 28 NHB, and 3 unknown. PDS outcome was not significantly different among NHB and H as compared to NHW. Compared to NHW, Asians were more likely to have >1cm residual (AOR 2.32, 95%CI 1.1-4.9, p=0.03). Median income for the entire cohort was $85,814 (range $10,926-$231,667). After adjusting for significant prognostic factors, there were no significant differences in PDS outcome between income groups (p=0.7281). Median OS was 55.1mos (95%CI 51.8-58.5) with no significant differences in OS between the income (p=0.628) or racial/ethnic (p=0.615) groups. CONCLUSION Statistically significant socio-demographic disparities in PDS and survival outcomes were not observed among women with advanced OC treated at this HVC. Increased efforts are needed to centralize care to and increase the diversity of pts treated at HVCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee A Cowan
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jill Tseng
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Narisha Ali
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen Dearie
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vijayashree Murthy
- Department of Surgery, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA
| | - Renee L Gennarelli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara C Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol L Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mowbray NG, Griffith D, Hammoda M, Shingler G, Kambal A, Al-Sarireh B. A meta-analysis of the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting survival after pancreatic cancer resection. HPB (Oxford) 2018; 20:379-384. [PMID: 29336893 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Revised: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is thought to reflect cancer disease burden. To assess the prognostic ability of the NLR on overall survival in patients with resectable, pancreatic cancer a meta-analysis of published literature was undertaken. METHOD A systematic review was performed independently by two authors using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases. Included studies detailed the pre-operative NLR and overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients. RESULTS Of the 214 studies retrieved using the search strategy, 8 studies involving 1519 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Only one study did not find a statistically significant association between a high NLR and OS. The pooled Hazard Ratio was 1.77 (95% CI [1.45-2.15]; p < 0.01). The NLR cut-off values ranged from 2 to 5. There was low to moderate inter-study heterogeneity (I2 = 31%; p = 0.17), a low risk of intra-study bias, and potentially 3 unpublished (negative) studies. CONCLUSIONS A high pre-operative NLR indicates a worse prognosis than in patients with a low NLR. There is potential to use the NLR to direct therapies. A specific cut-off value has not been established from this study and so further research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Griffith
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK
| | - Mohammed Hammoda
- Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK
| | - Guy Shingler
- Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK
| | - Amir Kambal
- Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK
| | - Bilal Al-Sarireh
- Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Chen Y, Xue SA, Behboudi S, Mohammad GH, Pereira SP, Morris EC. Ex Vivo PD-L1/PD-1 Pathway Blockade Reverses Dysfunction of Circulating CEA-Specific T Cells in Pancreatic Cancer Patients. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:6178-6189. [PMID: 28710313 PMCID: PMC5683391 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a candidate target for cellular immunotherapy of pancreatic cancer. In this study, we have characterized the antigen-specific function of autologous cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) specific for the HLA-A2-restricted peptide, pCEA691-699, isolated from the peripheral T-cell repertoire of pancreatic cancer patients and sought to determine if ex vivo PD-L1 and TIM-3 blockade could enhance CTL function.Experimental Design: CD8+ T-cell lines were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 18 HLA-A2+ patients with pancreatic cancer and from 15 healthy controls. In vitro peptide-specific responses were evaluated by flow cytometry after staining for intracellular cytokine production and carboxy fluorescein succinimydyl ester cytotoxicity assays using pancreatic cancer cell lines as targets.Results: Cytokine-secreting functional CEA691-specific CTL lines were successfully generated from 10 of 18 pancreatic cancer patients, with two CTL lines able to recognize and kill both CEA691 peptide-loaded T2 cells and CEA+ HLA-A2+ pancreatic cancer cell lines. In the presence of ex vivo PD-L1 blockade, functional CEA691-specific CD8+ T-cell responses, including IFNγ secretion and proliferation, were enhanced, and this effect was more pronounced on Ag-specific T cells isolated from tumor draining lymph nodes.Conclusions: These data demonstrate that CEA691-specific CTL can be readily expanded from the self-restricted T-cell repertoire of pancreatic cancer patients and that their function can be enhanced by PD-L1 blockade. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6178-89. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Chen
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shao-An Xue
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Genetic Engineering Laboratory, School of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Xi'An University, Xi'An, P. R. China
| | | | - Goran H Mohammad
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Chemistry Department, College of Science, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimanyah, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
| | - Stephen P Pereira
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C Morris
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Clin Exp Metastasis 2017; 34:309-314. [PMID: 28516306 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-017-9849-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from pancreatic cancer have a short life expectancy. Systemic combination chemotherapy leads to a median overall survival of 7-8 months. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a treatment alternative, where studies in patients with PM from ovarian, gastric and colorectal cancer show a high safety profile and interesting results. This case study report data on the PIPAC treatment in patients with PM from pancreatic cancer. In a standard laparoscopy, chemotherapeutics (cisplatin and doxorubicin) are nebulized within the peritoneal cavity. After 30 min, the chemotherapeutics are evacuated through a closed system. The PIPAC procedure is repeated every 4-6 weeks. Five patients with PM from pancreatic cancer were treated with a total of 16 PIPAC procedures. All patients received >1 PIPAC and were eligible for evaluation of histological regression. Four patients demonstrated histological regression, and one patient had stable disease. Three patients are still alive, and the median overall survival is 14 months (range 10-20) since the diagnosis of PM. The histological regression and survival figures in this pilot study suggest activity of PIPAC with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin in pretreated peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic origin. This should now be evaluated in prospective studies.
Collapse
|
19
|
Creighton N, Walton R, Roder DM, Aranda S, Richardson AJ, Merrett N, Currow D. Pancreatectomy is underused in NSW regions with low institutional surgical volumes: a population data linkage study. Med J Aust 2017; 206:23-29. [PMID: 28076733 DOI: 10.5694/mja16.00150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine differences in the proportions of people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatectomy, post-operative outcomes and 5-year survival in different New South Wales administrative health regions of residence. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective analysis of NSW data on pancreatic cancer incidence and surgery, 2005-2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The proportion of newly diagnosed patients with pancreatic cancer who were resected in each region; 90-day post-operative mortality; one-year post-operative survival; 5-year post-diagnosis survival. RESULTS 14% of people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer during 2010-2013 (431 of 3064) underwent pancreatectomy, an average of 108 resections per year. After adjusting for age, sex and comorbidities, the proportion that underwent resection varied significantly between regions, ranging between 8% and 21% (P<0.001). Higher resection rates were not associated with higher post-operative 90-day mortality or lower one-year survival (unadjusted and risk-adjusted analyses). Higher resection rates were associated with higher 5-year post-diagnosis survival: the mean survival in regions with resection rates below 10% was 3.4%, compared with 7.2% in regions with rates greater than 15% (unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses; P<0.001). There was a positive association between regional resection rate and the pancreatectomy volume of hospitals during 2005-2009. An additional 32 people would be resected annually if resection rates in low rate regions were increased to the 80th percentile regional resection rate (18%). CONCLUSION There is significant geographic variation in the proportion of people with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy, and the 5-year survival rate is higher in regions where this proportion is higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David M Roder
- Centre for Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roeyen G, Jansen M, Ruyssinck L, Chapelle T, Vanlander A, Bracke B, Hartman V, Ysebaert D, Berrevoet F. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy is more prevalent with pancreaticogastrostomy than with pancreaticojejunostomy. A retrospective multicentre observational cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18:1017-1022. [PMID: 27726974 PMCID: PMC5144554 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Revised: 09/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recently, pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) has attracted renewed interest as a reconstruction technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), as it may imply a lower risk of clinical pancreatic fistula than reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). We hypothesise that pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is more common during clinical follow-up after PG than it is after PJ. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study compares the prevalence of PEI in patients undergoing PD for malignancy with reconstruction by PG versus reconstruction by PJ. PEI during the first year of follow-up was defined as the intake of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) within one year postoperatively and/or an abnormal exocrine function test. RESULTS A total of 186 patients, having undergone surgery at two university hospitals, were included in the study. PEI during the first year postoperatively was present in 75.0% of the patients with PG, compared to 45.7% with PJ (p < 0.001). Intake of PERT within one year after surgery was found to be more prevalent in the PG group, i.e. 75.8% versus 38.5% (p < 0.001). There was a trend towards more disturbed exocrine function tests after PG (p = 0.061). CONCLUSIONS PEI is more common with PG reconstruction than with PJ reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert Roeyen
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Belgium.
| | - Miet Jansen
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Laure Ruyssinck
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Belgium
| | - Aude Vanlander
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Bart Bracke
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Belgium
| | - Vera Hartman
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Belgium
| | - Dirk Ysebaert
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Belgium
| | - Frederik Berrevoet
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|