Management and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer - A national population-based study.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:100-107. [PMID: 29224985 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.013]

Recurrence patterns and management of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is still challenging because of inhomogeneous patient cohorts regarding previous treatments as well as different recurrence patterns and locations. The aim of this study was to investigate the treatments and surgical approaches tailored to them.

METHODS

We included all patients who were treated for LRRC without distant metastasis at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany, between 2010 and 2021. We collected data from our electronic clinical data management system regarding the initial diagnosis and treatment, as well as the locations and treatment of the recurrent tumor.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 666 patients who were curatively treated for rectal cancer of whom 36 patients (5.4%) developed LRRC without distant recurrence. Most patients (26/36) had a tailored therapy regimen that included surgery with or without perioperative radiation and/or chemotherapy. The most common site of local relapse was around the former colorectal anastomosis (15/36, 41.7%). The operative procedures ranged from anterior resection to multi-organ resection and exenteration. A complete resection (R0) could be achieved in twelve patients (12/22. 54.5%). The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 79% and 72%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Most local recurrences occur at the anastomotic site and are mostly eligible for curative surgical therapy with good long-term survival.

Total Pelvic Exenteration with Presacral Fascia and Pelvic Musculature Excision for Pelvic Recurrence of Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Local relapse has not been eradicated even in the era of total mesorectum excision.1,2 Although various approaches have been attempted, R0 resection remains the only potentially curative treatment.3,4 PATIENT AND METHODS: A 45-year-old woman with a history of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection was diagnosed with pelvic recurrence 7 months ago. Then, she received chemoradiotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) showed pelvic recurrences at the surface of the right piriformis and obturator internus, posterior vaginal wall, and presacral fascia. The patient also had bilateral hydronephrosis. No distant metastasis was found. First, the lateral pelvic lymph nodes were removed. Then, the internal iliac arteries and veins were transected. Next, the fibrotic ureters were isolated and cut. Then, presacral fascia at the S4 and S5 levels was excised. Anteriorly, the urethra and vagina were transected. Lastly, the suspected pelvic recurrent lesions were resected en bloc with partial right piriformis, obturator internus, and gluteus maximus through a combined abdominal and perineal approach. Greater omental pedicle flap was transplanted into the pelvic cavity and pelvic floor was reconstructed.

RESULTS

The operative time was 600 min, and blood loss was 400 ml. Postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 14 days after surgery. Pathology report showed a moderately differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma invading the vagina, presacral fascia, and pelvic musculature. All margins were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

As demonstrated by this case, image-guided total pelvic exenteration with presacral fascia and sidewall musculature excision provides an opportunity to cure pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer.5.

Early Outcomes of Preoperative Short Course Radiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Response-adapted Chemotherapy for Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Limited evidence exists for dose escalation in neoadjuvant short course radiotherapy (SCRT) for rectal cancer. With enhanced imaging and radiotherapy techniques over the past decades along with the valuable endpoint of pathological complete response (pCR), we believe SCRT with simultaneous integrated boost could potentially provide deeper pathological responses and improve local control.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2020 and December 2022, locoregional-advanced rectal cancer patients that were treated with neoadjuvant SCRT with simultaneous integrated boost up to 5.5-6Gy per fraction with five daily fractions followed by response-adapted chemotherapy was retrospectively reviewed. The pCR rates, R0 resection rates, tumor downstaging, toxicities, and early pattern of recurrence are reported.

RESULTS

Among the 76 patients, 67 (88%) were able to undergo curative intent surgery. R0 resection was achieved in 99% (n = 66) of patients with pCR rates of 28% (n = 19). Forty-six percent (n = 31) of patients had significant pathological downstaging (ypT2N0) and 55% (n = 37) of patients had both T and N downstaging. Most common grade 3 or above radiotherapy-related side-effects were proctitis, rectal pain, and dermatitis found in 5% (n = 4), 3% (n = 2) and 3% (n = 2) of patients, respectively. Grade 3 or above surgical complications were observed in 15% (n = 10) of patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow-up of 27 months, only 6% (n = 4) had local recurrence after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant short course radiotherapy with simultaneous boost for rectal cancer is feasible with no added toxicities. Patients who underwent surgery achieve a high R0 resection and pCR rates. Early data suggest low rates of locoregional recurrence. Further follow-up and research is needed to validate and optimize the dose, method, and schedule of dose escalation.

Radical radiotherapy without surgical tumor resection for rectal cancer

In this editorial, I would like to comment on the article, recently published in the World Journal of Clinical Oncology. The article focuses on non-surgical treatments for locally recurrent rectal cancer, including the watch-and-wait (WW) strategy after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and particle beam therapy. As treatment options for rectal cancer continue to evolve, the high complete response rate achieved with TNT has led to the development of a new non-surgical approach: WW. Chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy, in particular, has a low rate of tumor growth and is a treatment aimed at achieving a cure without surgery. However, the risk of recurrence within two years is significant, necessitating careful follow-up. Establishing standardized follow-up methods that can be implemented by many physicians is essential. Carbon ion radiotherapy has demonstrated high local control with a low incidence of severe late toxicities, even after previous pelvic radiotherapy. While these new non-surgical curative treatments for rectal cancer require further investigation, future advancements in this field are anticipated.

Current Management of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), which occurs in 6-12% of patients previously treated with surgery, with or without pre-operative chemoradiation therapy, represents a complex and heterogeneous disease profoundly affecting the patient's quality of life (QoL) and long-term survival. Its management usually requires a multidisciplinary approach, to evaluate the several aspects of a LRRC, such as resectability or the best approach to reduce symptoms. Surgical treatment is more complex and usually needs high-volume centers to obtain a higher rate of radical (R0) resections and to reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Multiple factors related to the patient, to the primary tumor, and to the surgery for the primary tumor contribute to the development of local recurrence. Accurate pre-treatment staging of the recurrence is essential, and several classification systems are currently used for this purpose. Achieving an R0 resection through radical surgery remains the most critical factor for a favorable oncologic outcome, although both chemotherapy and radiotherapy play a significant role in facilitating this goal. If a R0 resection of a LRRC is not feasible, palliative treatment is mandatory to reduce the LRRC-related symptoms, especially pain, minimizing the effect of the recurrence on the QoL of the patients. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive narrative review of the literature regarding the management of LRRC.

Risk factors and treatment strategies for local recurrence of locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in total mesorectal excision (TME) and neoadjuvant radiotherapy, locally advanced rectal cancer remains challenging, impacting patient quality of life and mortality. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and assess treatment strategies for recurrence.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 682 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant CRT and TME at Samsung Medical Center from 2008 to 2017. The exclusion criteria ensured a homogenous cohort. Clinical staging involved colonoscopies, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and digital rectal exam. Risk factors, treatment modalities, and oncological outcomes for local recurrence were evaluated.

RESULT

During a median 62-month follow-up, 47 patients (6.9 %) experienced local recurrence. The risk factors for local recurrence included a positive circumferential resection margin (CRM), venous invasion, and perineural invasion. Of the 47 patients with local recurrence, 25 (53.2 %) were considered resectable. Out of these, 23 patients underwent curative resections, and 15 (65.2 %) achieved R0 resection. Patients with R0 resections exhibited superior 5-year survival rates compared to R1-2 resection or non-surgical treatment, and there was no survival difference between R1-2 resection and non-surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

In locally advanced rectal cancer, positive CRM, venous invasion, and perineural invasion were associated with local recurrence. R0 resection showed favorable outcomes, emphasizing the importance of surveillance in high-risk patients. Treatment decisions should consider these factors for improved oncologic outcomes and quality of life.

Outcomes of chemotherapy/chemoradiation vs. R2 surgical debulking vs. palliative care in nonresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer

Locally recurrent rectal cancer is resected with clear margins in only 50% of cases, and these patients achieve a three-year survival rate of 50%. Outcomes and therapeutic strategies for nonresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer have been much less explored. The aim of the study was to assess the three-year progression-free survival and the three-year overall survival in locally recurrent rectal cancer patients treated by chemotherapy/chemoradiation only vs. chemotherapy/chemoradiation and R2 surgical debulking vs. palliative care. A total of 86 patients affected by nonresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer were included: three-year progression-free survival was 15.8% with chemotherapy/chemoradiation vs. 20.3% with R2 surgical debulking (Log-rank p=0.567), but both rates were higher than best palliative care (0.0%, Log-rank p=0.0004). Three-year overall survival rates were respectively 62.0%, 70.8% and 0.0% (Log-rank p<0.0001). Chemotherapy/chemoradiation (HR 0.33, p=0.028) and R2 surgical debulking with or without chemotherapy/chemoradiation (HR 0.23, p=0.005) were independent predictors of improved progression-free survival on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, both chemotherapy/chemoradiation alone and R2 surgery with or without chemotherapy/chemoradiation provide a survival benefit over palliative care in nonresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer. However, considering that pelvic debulking is burdened by a high rate of complications, and considering its negligible impact on progression-free survival and overall survival when associated to medical therapy, surgery should be avoided in this setting.

Postoperative venous thromboembolism after surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence is common after curative resections of rectal cancer. Surgical resection is considered a primary curative treatment option for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). LRRC often requires a combined resection of other organs, especially in the case of posterior recurrence, which requires a combined resection of the sacrum, making the surgery highly invasive. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the lethal complications in the postoperative period, particularly in the field of pelvic surgery. We found no reports regarding the risks of postoperative VTE in surgery for LRRC, a typical highly invasive procedure in the field of colorectal surgery. This study aims to evaluate the risk of postoperative VTE in surgery for LRRC patients.

METHODS

From April 2010 to March 2022, a total of 166 patients underwent surgery for LRRC in the pelvic region at our institutions. Clinicopathological background and VTE incidence were compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

Among the 166 patients included in the study, 55 patients (33.1%) needed sacral resection. Pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of VTE was performed in 121 patients (73.3%), and the incidence of VTE was 9.09% (5/55 patients) among those who underwent surgery for LRRC with sacral resection, while it was 1.8% (2/111 patients) in those without sacral resection. In univariate analysis, the combination with sacral resection was identified as a risk factor for VTE in surgery for LRRC (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that surgery for LRRC combined with sacral resection could be a significant risk factor for VTE.

Post recurrence survival in early versus late period and its prognostic factors in rectal cancer patients

To identify factors associated with post-recurrence survival (PRS), we examined our institutional recurrence patterns following definitive resection for rectal cancer. We reviewed all patients with rectal cancer diagnosed at three hospitals in the east of Iran from 2011 to 2020. The optimal cut-off value was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine early recurrence. The effect of recurrence time was evaluated on PRS. 326 eligible patients with a mean ± SD age of 56 ± 12.8 years were included in this study. In a median (IQR: Inter-quartile range) follow-up time of 76 (62.2) months, 106 (32.5%) patients experienced at least any recurrence (locoregional or distant metastasis) following primary resection. The median (IQR) time from initial surgery to recurrence was 29.5 (31.2) months. Based on ROC analysis, early recurrence was specified at ≤ 29 months. However, for the patients who experienced only locoregional recurrence, 33 months was the cut-off to define early recurrence. Recurrence time and recurrence management were both significant variables on PRS. Moreover, TNM staging was significantly associated with early recurrence (P = 0.003). In this research, recurrence time, recurrence management and TNM staging were found to be correlated with PRS.

Treatment of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: A Review

ABSTRACT

Up to 10% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer will experience locoregional recurrence. In the setting of prior surgery and often radiation and chemotherapy, these represent uniquely challenging cases. When feasible, surgical resection offers the best chance for oncologic control yet risks significant morbidity. Studies have consistently indicated that a negative surgical resection margin is the strongest predictor of oncologic outcomes. Chemoradiation is often recommended to increase the chance of an R0 resection, and in cases of close/positive margins, intraoperative radiation/brachytherapy can be utilized. In patients who are not surgical candidates, radiation can provide symptomatic relief. Ongoing phase III trials are aiming to address questions regarding the role of reirradiation and induction multiagent chemotherapy regimens in this population.

Current Applications and Future Directions of Circulating Tumor Cells in Colorectal Cancer Recurrence

The ability to predict or detect colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence early after surgery enables physicians to apply appropriate treatment plans and different follow-up strategies to improve patient survival. Overall, 30-50% of CRC patients experience cancer recurrence after radical surgery, but current surveillance tools have limitations in the precise and early detection of cancer recurrence. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells that detach from the primary tumor and enter the bloodstream. These can provide real-time information on disease status. CTCs might become novel markers for predicting CRC recurrence and, more importantly, for making decisions about additional adjuvant chemotherapy. In this review, the clinical application of CTCs as a therapeutic marker for stage II CRC is described. It then discusses the utility of CTCs for monitoring cancer recurrence in advanced rectal cancer patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Finally, it discusses the roles of CTC subtypes and CTCs combined with clinicopathological factors in establishing a multimarker model for predicting CRC recurrence.

[Treatment strategies for recurrent rectal cancer]

Multimodal treatment approaches with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by oncological and total mesorectal excision (TME) have significantly reduced the recurrence rate even in locally advanced rectal cancer. Nevertheless, up to 10% of patients develop a local relapse. Surgical R0 resection is the only chance of a cure in the treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Due to the altered anatomy and physiology of the true pelvis as a result of the pretreatment and operations as well as the localization and extent of the recurrence, the treatment decision is individualized and remains a challenge for the interdisciplinary team. Even locally advanced tumors with involvement of adjacent structures can be treated in designated centers using multimodal treatment concepts with potentially curative intent.

Changes in serum uric acid, serum uric acid/serum creatinine ratio, and gamma-glutamyltransferase might predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of changes in serum uric acid (SUA), the ratio of serum uric acid to serum creatinine (SUA/SCr), and serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) from before to after therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Data from 114 LARC patients from January 2016 to December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME). The change in SUA was calculated as a ratio: (SUA level after nCRT-SUA level before nCRT)/SUA level before nCRT. The change ratios of SUA/SCr and GGT were calculated in the same way. The efficacy of nCRT was evaluated by magnetic resonance (MR) and postoperative pathological response. A nonlinear model was used to evaluate whether the change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT were associated with the efficacy of nCRT. The predictive power of the change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to measure the associations between disease-free survival (DFS) and other predictive indicators. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to further compare DFS between groups.

RESULTS

The nonlinear model indicated that the change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT were associated with the efficacy of nCRT. The change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT were used to predict the area under the ROC curve of efficacy for nCRT (0.95, 0.91-0.99), which was better than the prediction by the change ratio of SUA (0.94, 0.89-0.99), SUA/SCr (0.90, 0.84-0.96), or GGT alone (0.86, 0.79-0.93; p < 0.05). The optimal cut-off values of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT change were 0.02, 0.01, and 0.04, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method indicated that patients with SUA, SUA/SCr, or GGT changes greater than the cut-off values had shorter DFS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, or GGT greater than the cut-off values implied a risk of poor pathological response after nCRT and shorter DFS in LARC patients.

Evolution of clinical nature, treatment and survival of locally recurrent rectal cancer: Comparative analysis of two national cross-sectional cohorts

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer declined after guideline revision in 2014. This decline is thought to affect the clinical nature and treatability of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Therefore, this study compared two national cross-sectional cohorts before and after the guideline revision with the aim to determine the changes in treatment and survival of LRRC patients over time.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of primary rectal cancer in 2011 (n = 2094) and 2016 (n = 2855) from two nationwide cohorts with a 4-year follow up were included. Main outcomes included time to LRRC, synchronous metastases at time of LRRC diagnosis, intention of treatment and 2-year overall survival after LRRC.

RESULTS

Use of neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for the primary tumour decreased from 88.5% to 60.0% from 2011 to 2016. The 3-year LRRC rate was not significantly different with 5.1% in 2011 (n = 114, median time to LRRC 16 months) and 6.3% in 2016 (n = 202, median time to LRRC 16 months). Synchronous metastasis rate did not significantly differ (27.2% vs 33.7%, p = 0.257). Treatment intent of the LRRC shifted towards more curative treatment (30.4% vs. 47.0%, p = 0.009). In the curatively treated group, two-year overall survival after LRRC diagnoses increased from 47.5% to 78.7% (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Primary rectal cancer patients in 2016 were treated less often with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, while LRRC rates remained similar. Those who developed LRRC were more often candidate for curative intent treatment compared to the 2011 cohort, and survival after curative intent treatment also improved substantially.

Multidisciplinary management of locally recurrent rectal cancer with carbon ion radiotherapy followed by prophylactic removal of the irradiated bowel: a case report

BACKGROUND

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) involving the upper sacrum is typically incurable, and palliative treatment is the only option for most patients, resulting in a poor prognosis and reduced quality of life. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has emerged as a promising modality for treating LRRC. This report presents a case of LRRC with sacral involvement that was managed via multidisciplinary therapy incorporating CIRT.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 55-year-old male was diagnosed with an anastomotic recurrence of rectal cancer 15 months after undergoing anterior resection. Computed tomography (CT) suggested that the lesion was at an anastomosis site and broadly adherent to the upper sacrum, and colonoscopy confirmed the diagnosis of LRRC. Histopathological examination of the biopsy specimens revealed adenocarcinoma cells and that lesion was genetically RAS-wild. Induction chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 and panitumumab was used as the first treatment. The recurrent lesion shrank and no signs of distant metastasis were observed after 11 cycles, although the range of the lesions attached to the sacrum remained unchanged. Therefore, we provided CIRT for this inoperable lesion and prophylactically removed the radiation-exposed bowel including the recurrent lesion, because radiation-induced ulcers can cause bleeding and perforation. Despite the presence of considerable fibrosis in the irradiated region, the operation was successful and the postoperative course had no untoward incidents. He is still recurrence-free 24 months following surgery, despite the lack of adjuvant chemotherapy. This is the first report of CIRT followed by CIRT-irradiated bowel removal for an unresectable anastomosis recurrent lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical course of this case suggests that CIRT could be a potentially effective therapeutic option for LRRC involving the bowel, as long as the prophylactic removal of the irradiated bowel is performed at the optimal time. Further research involving larger sample sizes is warranted to validate the findings and conclusions of this case report.

TORCH-R trial protocol: hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and toripalimab for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a prospective, single-arm, two-cohort, phase II trial

For patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), the response rate to chemoradiotherapy is 40%-50%. Additionally, only approximately 40%-50% of patients with recurrent rectal cancer are able to undergo R0 resection. Recent studies in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have shown promising synergistic effects when combining immunotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies) with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Therefore, incorporating immunotherapy into the treatment regimen for LRRC patients has the potential to further improve response rates and prognosis. To investigate this, the TORCH-R trial was conducted. This prospective, single-arm, two-cohort, phase II trial focuses on the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in LRRC patients without or with oligometastases. The trial will include two cohorts: cohort A consists of rectal cancer patients who are treatment-naive for local recurrence, and cohort B includes patients with progressive disease after first-line chemotherapy. Cohort A and cohort B patients will receive 25-40 Gy/5 Fx irradiation or 15-30 Gy/5 Fx reirradiation for pelvic recurrence, respectively. Subsequently, they will undergo 18 weeks of chemotherapy, toripalimab, and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for all metastatic lesions between chemoimmunotherapy cycles. Decisions regarding follow-up of complete response (CR), radical surgery, sustained treatment of non-resection, or exiting the trial are made by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). The primary endpoint of this study is the local objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints include the extrapelvic response rate, duration of response, local recurrence R0 resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability. Notably, this trial represents the first clinical exploration of inducing hypofractionated radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in LRRC patients.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05628038, identifier NCT05628038.

A prospective case series assessing the Imperial College London intraoperative radiotherapy protocol for advanced rectal cancer: an IDEAL phase 2a study

AIM

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) decreases local recurrence rates for advanced rectal cancer. Nevertheless, utilization of IORT is limited due to the associated logistical and financial challenges. The aim of this study is to describe the development and delivery of a novel IORT protocol for advanced rectal cancer that overcomes these difficulties in the context of the early phase of an IDEAL 2a study. The primary outcome measure was the ability to deliver IORT using this novel protocol with IORT-related toxicity as the secondary outcome measure.

METHOD

Consecutive patients with advanced rectal cancer expected to have involved (R1) resection margins were enrolled. After resection, 12 Gy low-energy photon IORT was delivered using the Axxent device with a custom-designed elliptical spherical balloon applicator.

RESULTS

Six patients with a median age of 47 years (range 33-88 years; five women) were enrolled between 2018 and 2019. The indication was advanced cancer in four patients and atypical invasive pelvic side wall lymph nodes in two. IORT was successfully delivered in all cases. No toxicity was encountered. Three advanced cancer patients had R1 resection and one had complete resection (R0); resection margin status could not be established for the two lymph node cases. Five patients were alive at 3.4 (2.9-4.1) year follow-up. None of the R1 cases recurred.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to describe a novel IORT protocol using low-energy photon IORT for advanced rectal cancer. IORT could be delivered in all cases and no IORT-related toxicity was encountered. Available oncological outcome data are encouraging, but further studies will be necessary to determine the oncological effectiveness of this protocol.

Oncological outcomes of multimodality treatment for patients undergoing surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There are several strategies in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) with the optimum treatment yet to be established. This systematic review aims to compare oncological outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for LRRC who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), adjuvant CRT, surgery only or surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT).

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL was performed for studies that reported data on oncological outcomes for the different treatment modalities in patients with LRRC from January 1990 to January 2022. Weighted means were calculated for the following outcomes: postoperative resection status, local control, and overall survival at 3 and 5 years.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies of 974 patients were included and they received the following treatment: 346 neoadjuvant radiotherapy, 279 neoadjuvant CRT, 136 adjuvant CRT, 189 surgery only, and 24 surgery and IORT. The highest proportion of R0 resection was found in the neoadjuvant CRT group followed by neoadjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant CRT groups (64.07% vs 52.46% vs 47.0% respectively). The neoadjuvant CRT group had the highest mean 5-year local control rate (49.50%) followed by neoadjuvant radiotherapy (22.0%). Regarding the 5-year overall survival rate, the neoadjuvant CRT group had the highest mean of 34.92%, followed by surgery only (29.74%), neoadjuvant radiotherapy (28.94%) and adjuvant CRT (20.67%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this systematic review suggest that neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery can lead to improved resection status, long-term disease control and survival in the management of LRRC. However, treatment strategies in LRRC are complex and further comparisons, particularly taking into account previous treatments for the primary rectal cancer, are required.

Induction chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by chemoradiotherapy before surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has a high incidence of local and distant relapse even after adequate treatment. The emerging role of neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy may allow initial down staging of the primary tumor, less toxicity and early treatment of micrometastatic disease followed by chemoradiation with the hope of increased complete response rates before surgery OBJECTIVES: To identify the effect of induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiation (CCRTH) in locally advanced rectal cancer in terms of response and toxicity. Primary end point is assessment of pathological complete response rate after surgery. Secondary end points are disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after 3 years follow up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with MRI based criteria for staging high-risk LARC (T4 tumors, tumors within 2 mm of mesorectal fascia, T3 tumors at or below levators and T2-4 with LN +ve tumors) were included. Thirty-five patients were recruited. Patients received 12 weeks of induction capecitabine/oxaliplatin followed by concomitant capecitabine and conventional 3D-conformal radiotherapy. Surgery was done at least 6 weeks later .

RESULTS

Five patients (20.8%) had a pathological complete response (TRG 0) (ypT0N0). Another three patients (12.5%) had near complete pathological response (TRG 1). Regarding OS and pathological complete response corrlelation, it was statistically not significant in relation to patients with incomplete pathological response (p = 1).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy could be a promising option for better response rates either clinical or pathological for high risk LARC patients with acceptable toxicity.

Image-guided navigation for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer: evaluation of its early cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

A first pilot study showed that an image-guided navigation system could improve resection margin rates in locally advanced (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) patients. Incremental surgical innovation is often implemented without reimbursement consequences, health economic aspects should however also be taken into account. This study evaluates the early cost-effectiveness of navigated surgery compared to standard surgery in LARC and LRRC.

METHODS

A Markov decision model was constructed to estimate the expected costs and outcomes for navigated and standard surgery. The input parameters were based on pilot data from a prospective (navigation cohort n = 33) and retrospective (control group n = 142) data. Utility values were measured in a comparable group (n = 63) through the EQ5D-5L. Additionally, sensitivity and value of information analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Based on this early evaluation, navigated surgery showed incremental costs of €3141 and €2896 in LARC and LRRC. In LARC, navigated surgery resulted in 2.05 Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) vs 2.02 QALYs for standard surgery. For LRRC, we found 1.73 vs 1.67 QALYs respectively. This showed an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of €136.604 for LARC and €52.510 for LRRC per QALY gained. In scenario analyses, optimal utilization rates of the navigation technology lowered the ICER to €61.817 and €21.334 for LARC and LRRC. The ICERs of both indications were most sensitive to uncertainty surrounding the risk of progression in the first year after surgery, the risk of having a positive surgical margin, and the costs of the navigation system.

CONCLUSION

Adding navigation system use is expected to be cost-effective in LRRC and has the potential to become cost-effective in LARC. To increase the probability of being cost-effective, it is crucial to optimize efficient use of both the hybrid OR and the navigation system and identify subgroups where navigation is expected to show higher effectiveness.

MRI tumour regression grade in locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the agreement between magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) and pathological regression grade (pTRG) in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Also, the reproducibility of mrTRG was investigated.

METHODS

All patients with LRRC who underwent a resection between 2010 and 2018 after treatment with induction chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation in whom a restaging MRI was available were retrospectively selected. All MRI scans were reassessed by two independent radiologists using the mrTRG, and the pTRG was reassessed by an independent pathologist. The interobserver agreement between the radiologists as well as between the radiologists and the pathologist was assessed with the weighted kappa test. A subanalysis was performed to evaluate the influence of the interval between imaging and surgery.

RESULTS

Out of 313 patients with LRRC treated during the study interval, 124 patients were selected. Interobserver agreement between the radiologists was fair (k = 0.28) using a two-tier grading system (mrTRG 1-2 versus mrTRG 3-5). For the lead radiologist, agreement with pTRG was moderate (k = 0.52; 95 per cent c.i. 0.36 to 0.68) when comparing good (mrTRG 1-2 and Mandard 1-2) and intermediate/poor responders (mrTRG 3-5 and Mandard 3-5), and the agreement was fair between the other abdominal radiologist and pTRG (k = 0.39; 95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.56). A shorter interval (less than 7 weeks) between MRI and surgery resulted in an improved agreement (k = 0.69), compared with an interval more than 7 weeks (k = 0.340). For the lead radiologist, the positive predictive value for predicting good responders was 95 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 71 per cent to 99 per cent), whereas this was 56 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 44 per cent to 66 per cent) for the other radiologist.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that, in LRRC, the reproducibility of mrTRG among radiologists is limited and the agreement of mrTRG with pTRG is low. However, a shorter interval between MRI and surgery seems to improve this agreement and, if assessed by a dedicated radiologist, mrTRG could predict good responders.

Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study

Background

Rectal cancer, one of most common neoplasms, is characterized by an overall survival rate exceeding 60%. Nonetheless, local recurrence (LR) following surgery for rectal cancer remains a formidable clinical problem. The aim of this study was to assess the value of postoperative endoscopic surveillance (PES) for the early detection of LR in rectal cancer after radical anterior resection with sigmoid-rectal anastomosis.

Methods

We performed an anterior resection in 228 patients with stages I‑III rectal cancer who had undergone surgery from 2001 to 2008 in the Oncology Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland. Of these patients, 169 had perioperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. All patients underwent PES with abdominal and pelvic imaging (abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance) and clinical examination. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to compare the value of colonoscopy versus imaging techniques for the diagnosis of LR.

Results

During the 5-year follow-up, recurrences occurred in 49 (21%) patients; of these, 15 (6%) had LR, which was most often located outside the intestinal lumen (n = 10, 4%). Anastomotic LR occurred in 5 (2%) patients. The mean time to anastomotic LR was 30 months after initial surgery, similar to that of other locations (29 months). Both imaging and endoscopy were shown to be efficient techniques for the diagnosis of LR in anastomotic sites. In the study group, endoscopy did not provide any additional benefit in patients who were receiving radiation therapy.

Conclusions

The benefit of PES for the detection of LR after curative treatment of rectal cancer is limited and not superior to imaging techniques. It remains a useful method, however, for the histopathological confirmation of suspected or confirmed recurrence.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02413-0.

Whole-exome sequencing of rectal cancer identifies locally recurrent mutations in the Wnt pathway

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) leads to a poor prognosis and appears as a clinically predominant pattern of failure. In this research, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 21 samples from 8 patients to search for the molecular mechanisms of LRRC. The data was analyzed by bioinformatics. Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) and Human Protein Atlas (HPA) were performed to validate the candidate genes. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the protein expression of LEF1 and CyclinD1 in LRRC, primary rectal cancer (PRC), and non-recurrent rectal cancer (NRRC) specimens. The results showed that LRRC, PRC, and NRRC had 668, 794, and 190 specific genes, respectively.

FGFR1 and MYC have copy number variants (CNVs) in PRC and LRRC, respectively. LRRC specific genes were mainly enriched in positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, plasma membrane, and ATP binding. The specific signaling pathways of LRRC were Wnt signaling pathway, gap junction, and glucagon signaling pathway, etc. The transcriptional and translational expression levels of genes including NFATC1, PRICKLE1, SOX17, and WNT6 related to Wnt signaling pathway were higher in rectal cancer (READ) tissues than normal rectal tissues. The PRICKLE1 mutation (c.C875T) and WNT6 mutation (c.G629A) were predicted as “D (deleterious)”. Expression levels of LEF1 and cytokinin D1 proteins: LRRC > PRC > NRRC > normal rectal tissue. Gene variants in the Wnt signaling pathway may be critical for the development of LRRC. The present study may provide a basis for the prediction of LRRC and the development of new therapeutic drugs.

Review of incomplete macroscopic resections (R2) in rectal cancer: Treatment, prognosis and future perspectives

Colorectal cancer is one of the most prevalent tumours, but with improved treatment and early detection, its prognosis has greatly improved in recent years. However, when the tumour is locally advanced at diagnosis or if there is local recurrence, it is more difficult to perform a complete tumour resection, and there may be a residual macroscopic tumour. In this paper, we review the literature on residual macroscopic tumour resections, concerning both locally advanced primary tumours and recurrences, evaluating the main problems encountered, the treatments applied, the prognosis and future perspectives in this field.

Treatment and subsequent prognosis in locally recurrent rectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study of 498 patients

PURPOSE

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) has a tremendous impact on prognosis as well as the quality of life. Because of the low incidence and various recurrence patterns, the treatment outcome of LRRC is not fully elucidated. The current study aimed to evaluate the prognosis and identify the prognosticators in patients with LRRC.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter study at 24 hospitals in Japan. Patients with primary rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between 1997 and 2012 and developed local recurrence only as a first recurrent event were recruited. The primary outcome of our study was overall survival (OS) after a diagnosis of LRRC.

RESULTS

Four hundred and ninety-eight patients were included in the study. Of these, 213 (42.8%) underwent surgical resection; this was associated with the best 5-year OS rate of 52%, followed by carbon ion/proton therapy (44%). Among LRRC patients, undifferentiated type, T4, high CEA level, and high CA19-9 level were independent prognosticators of OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.83, P = 0.008, HR = 1.54, P = 0.004, HR = 1.35, P = 0.03, and HR = 1.58, P = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale cohort study showed that surgical resection led to a favorable prognosis compared to other treatments for LRRC. Therefore, surgical resection should be considered whenever feasible for LRRC patients. In addition, undifferentiated type, T4, and tumor marker (CEA and CA19-9) elevation were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS among patients with LRRC.

Surgical treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a narrative review

Objective

To summarize the recent literature on surgical treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

Background

LRRC is a heterogeneous disease that requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach. The treatment and prognosis depend on the site and type of recurrence. Radical resection remains the primary method for achieving long-term survival and improving symptom control. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy can reduce tumor volume and improve the R0 resection rate. Surgeons must clearly understand pelvic anatomy, develop a detailed preoperative plan, adopt a multidisciplinary approach for the surgical resection of the tumor as well as any invaded soft tissues, vessels, and bones, and ensure proper reconstruction. However, extended radical surgery often leads to a higher risk of postoperative complications and a low quality of life.

Methods

We searched English-language articles with keywords “locally recurrent rectal cancer”, “surgery” and “multidisciplinary team” in PubMed published between January 2000 to October 2020.

Conclusions

LRRC is a complex problem. Long-term survival is not impossible following multidisciplinary treatment in appropriately selected LRRC patients. The management of LRRC relies on a specialist team that determines the biological behavior of the tumor and evaluates treatment options through multidisciplinary discussions, thereby balancing the surgical costs and benefits, alleviating postoperative complications, and improving patients’ quality of life.

Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as neoadjuvant treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer: study protocol of a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arms, randomized controlled study (PelvEx II)

BACKGROUND

A resection with clear margins (R0 resection) is the most important prognostic factor in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). However, this is achieved in only 60 per cent of patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the addition of induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation improves the R0 resection rate in LRRC.

METHODS

This multicentre, international, open-label, phase III, parallel-arms study will enrol 364 patients with resectable LRRC after previous partial or total mesorectal resection without synchronous distant metastases or recent chemo- and/or radiotherapy treatment. Patients will be randomized to receive either induction chemotherapy (three 3-week cycles of CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin), four 2-week cycles of FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) or FOLFORI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan)) followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery (experimental arm) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery alone (control arm). Tumours will be restaged using MRI and, in the experimental arm, a further cycle of CAPOX or two cycles of FOLFOX/FOLFIRI will be administered before chemoradiotherapy in case of stable or responsive disease. The radiotherapy dose will be 25 × 2.0 Gy or 28 × 1.8 Gy in radiotherapy-naive patients, and 15 × 2.0 Gy in previously irradiated patients. The concomitant chemotherapy agent will be capecitabine administered twice daily at a dose of 825 mg/m2 on radiotherapy days. The primary endpoint of the study is the R0 resection rate. Secondary endpoints are long-term oncological outcomes, radiological and pathological response, toxicity, postoperative complications, costs, and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

This trial protocol describes the PelvEx II study. PelvEx II, designed as a multicentre, open-label, phase III, parallel-arms study, is the first randomized study to compare induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation and surgery with neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation and surgery alone in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, with the aim of improving the number of R0 resections.

Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of surgical outcome in patients with local pelvic recurrence of colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic local recurrence of colorectal cancer (PRCRC) may be cured if radical surgery is performed. Preoperative assessment normally includes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of specific MRI-related findings on outcome of surgery of PRCRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data from 95 consecutive patients, operated with a curative intent for PRCRC at Karolinska University Hospital during 2003-2013, were collected from medical records. Preoperative MRI examinations of the PRCRC were re-evaluated. The potential influence of clinical factors and specific MRI-findings (location, solid/mucinous, size, volume and border) on surgical resection margins (R0-R1) and survival were calculated with logistic and cox regression.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients had available MRI scans and were included in the study. Sixty-five patients (75%) had a R0 resection and 22 patients (25%) had a R1 resection of their PRCRC. In all, 47 patients (54%) had an involved lateral compartment. Lateral location was the only MRI finding associated with both an increased risk of R1 resection (OR 3.97, 95%CI: 1.31-12.04) and death (HR 1.94, 95%CI: 1.07-3.51). Lateral location entailed an increased risk of death also after R0 resection (HR2.09, 95%CI: 1.07-4.10). Five-year survival was 35% for all patients, 44% after R0 resection and 7% after R1 resection.

CONCLUSION

Tumour involvement of the lateral and posterior compartments on MRI was a predictor for R1 resection, but only lateral involvement was associated with an increased risk of death. An increased risk of death associated with lateral involvement was still present after R0 resection.

Clinical Reality and Treatment for Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: Despite advances in treatment, local recurrence remains a great concern in patients with rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of local recurrence of rectal cancer in our single center over a 7-year-period. Materials and Methods: Patients with stage I-III rectal cancer were treated with curative intent. The necessity for radiotherapy and chemotherapy was determined before surgery and/or postoperative histopathological results. Results: Of 365 rectal cancer patients, 76 (20.8%) developed recurrent disease. In total, 27 (7.4%) patients presented with a local tumor recurrence (isolated in 40.7% of cases). Radiotherapy was performed in 296 (81.1%) patients. The most often used schema was 5 × 5 Gy followed by immediate surgery (n = 214, 58.6%). Local recurrence occurred less frequently in patients treated with 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy followed by surgery (n = 9, 4%). Surgical procedures of relapses were performed in 12 patients, six of whom were operated with radical intent. Only two (7.4%) patients lived more than 5 years after local recurrence treatment. The incidence of local recurrence was associated with primary tumor distal location and worse prognosis. The median overall survival of patients after local recurrence treatment was 19 months. Conclusions: Individualized rectal cancer patient selection and systematic treatment algorithms should be used clinical practice to minimize likelihood of relapse. 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy followed by immediate surgery allows good local control in resectable cT2N+/cT3N0 patients. Radical resection of isolated local recurrence offers the best chances of cure.

Prediction of R0/R+ surgery by different classifications for locally recurrent rectal cancer

A widely adopted classification system for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is currently missing, and the indication for surgery is not standardized. To evaluate all the published classification systems in a large monocentric cohort of LRRC patients, assessing their capability to predict a radical (R0) resection. A total of 152 consecutive LRRC patients treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (NCIM) from 2009 to 2017 were classified according to Pilipshen, Mayo Clinic, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), Wanebo, Yamada, Boyle, Dutch TME Trial, Royal Marsden and National Cancer Institute of Milan (NCIM) classification systems. Central location of LRRC was significantly predictive of R0 resection across all classification systems. R + resection was predicted by the "anterior" category of MSKCC (OR 2.66, p = 0.007), the "S2b" (OR 3.50, p = 0.04) and the "S3" (OR 2.70, p = 0.01) categories of NCIM, "pelvic disease through anastomosis" of Pilipshen (OR 2.89, p = 0.002), "fixed at 2 sites" of Mayo Clinic (OR 2.68, p = 0.019), and "TR4" of Wanebo (OR 3.39, p = 0.002). The NCIM was the most predictive classification for R0 surgery. The NCIM classification seems to be superior among the others in predicting R0 surgery. Generally, lateral invasive and high sacral invasive relapses are associated with reduced probability of R0 surgery and unfavorable outcomes.

One-year excess mortality and treatment in surgically treated patients with colorectal cancer: A EURECCA European comparison

BACKGROUND

Mortality in the first postoperative year represents an accurate reflection of the perioperative risk after colorectal cancer surgery. This research compares one-year mortality after surgery divided into three age-categories (18-64, 65-74, ≥75 years), focusing on time trends and comparing treatment strategies.

MATERIAL

Population-based data of all patients diagnosed and treated surgically for stage I-III primary colorectal cancer from 2007 to 2016, were collected from Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. Stratified for age-category and stage, treatment was evaluated, and 30-day, one-year and one-year excess mortality were calculated for colon and rectal cancer separately. Results were evaluated over two-year time periods.

RESULTS

Data of 206,024 patients were analysed. Postoperative 30-day and one-year mortality reduced significantly over time in all countries and age-categories. Within the oldest age category, in 2015-2016, one-year excess mortality varied from 9% in Belgium to 4% in Sweden for colon cancer and, from 9% in Belgium to 3% in the other countries for rectal cancer. With increasing age, patients were less likely to receive additional therapy besides surgery. In Belgium, colon cancer patients were more often treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). For neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, patients in Belgium and Norway were mostly treated with chemoradiotherapy. In the Netherlands and Sweden, radiotherapy alone was preferred (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvement over time in all countries and age-categories, substantial variation exists in one-year postoperative mortality. Differences in one-year excess postoperative mortality could be due to differences in treatment strategies, highlighting the consequences of under- and over-treatment on cancer survival.

Superior Effect of the Combination of Carbon-Ion Beam Irradiation and 5-Fluorouracil on Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells in vitro and in vivo

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate whether carbon-ion beam irradiation in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is superior to carbon-ion beam irradiation alone in targeting colorectal cancer stem-like cells (CSCs).

Materials and Methods

Human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, HCT116 and HT29, were treated with carbon-ion beam irradiation alone or in combination with 5-FU. Cell viability assay, colony and spheroid formation assay, apoptotic assay, and quantitative real-time PCR analysis of apoptosis- and autophagy-related gene expression were performed.

Results

Carbon-ion beam irradiation dose-dependently decreased CRC cell viability and showed significantly enhanced cell killing effect when combined with 5-FU. Carbon-ion beam irradiation in combination with 5-FU significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic cells. The expression of some apoptotic and autophagy-related genes such as Bax, Bcl2, Beclin1 and ATG7 was significantly induced by carbon-ion beam irradiation alone and was further enhanced when the beam was combined with 5-FU. The spheroid forming capacity of CD133+ cell subpopulations was significantly inhibited by carbon-ion beam in combination with 5-FU. Histopathologically, the combination of carbon-ion beam irradiation and 5-FU destroyed more xenograft tumor cells, and resulted in increased necrosis, cavitation, and fibrosis, compared to carbon-ion beam irradiation alone.

Conclusion

In conclusion, carbon-ion beam treatment combined with 5-FU has the potential to kill CRC cells including CSCs by inducing increased apoptosis and autophagy.

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Different Treatment Modes for Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer

Objective

Optimal approaches to patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer are unclear in China. This study aimed to evaluaty -30te the clinical outcomes and toxicity associated with different treatment regimens for patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer and previous radical surgical treatment between March 2010 and December 2017 with curative intent was performed. Disease-related endpoints included treatment progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier method. Toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, and complications were scored according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results

A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria in this study. The recurrence sites were mainly local recurrence in the pelvic cavity and regional lymph node metastasis. Twenty patients received chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery, 10 underwent surgery alone, and others received chemoradiotherapy-alone (n = 27) and chemotherapy-alone (n = 14) treatment. A clear difference was found in PFS between surgery/chemoradiotherapy with surgery and chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy groups (26.6 months vs 14.1 months, P = 0.033). The PFS of patients in the surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy, surgery alone, and chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy groups was 65.2 months, 20.2 months, and 14.2 months, respectively (P = 0.042). The multivariate analysis of PFS demonstrated that surgery was an independent factor. The proportion of patients with distant metastases after chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy was higher than that of patients undergoing surgery (36.6% vs 21.4%, P = 0.179). The OS of patients in the surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy, surgery alone, and chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy groups was 89.4 months, 66.0 months, and 62.8 months, respectively (P = 0.189). Radiation treatment and surgery did not increase extra severe toxicities.

Conclusion

Surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy was a beneficial treatment mode for managing patients with locally recurrent, nonmetastatic rectal cancer. It was associated with better local disease control, no increase in toxicity, and prolonged survival among patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer.

A proposal of an updated classification for pelvic relapses of rectal cancer to guide surgical decision-making

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Selection of patients affected by pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer (PRRC) who are likely to achieve a R0 resection is mandatory. The aim of this study was to propose a classification for PRRC to predict both radical surgery and disease-free survival (DFS).

METHODS

PRRC patients treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (Italy) were included in the study. PRRC were classified as S1, if located centrally (S1a-S1b) or anteriorly (S1c) within the pelvis; S2, in case of sacral involvement below (S2a) or above (S2b) the second sacral vertebra; S3, in case of lateral pelvic involvement.

RESULTS

Of 280 reviewed PRRC patients, 152 (54.3%) were evaluated for curative surgery. The strongest predictor of R+ resection was the S3 category (OR, 6.37; P = .011). Abdominosacral resection (P = .012), anterior exenteration (P = .012) and extended rectal re-excision (P = .003) were predictive of R0 resection. S3 category was highly predictive of poor DFS (HR 2.53; P = .038). DFS was significantly improved after R0 surgery for S1 (P < .0001) and S2 (P = .015) patients but not for S3 cases (P = .525).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed classification allows selection of subjects candidates to curative surgery, emphasizing that lateral pelvic involvement is the main predictor of R+ resection and independently affects the DFS.

Improved Outcomes for Responders After Treatment with Induction Chemotherapy and Chemo(re)irradiation for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the multimodality treatment for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), oncological outcomes remain poor. This study evaluated the effect of induction chemotherapy and subsequent chemo(re)irradiation on the pathologic response and the rate of resections with clear margins (R0 resection) in relation to long-term oncological outcomes.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with LRRC treated in the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven who underwent a resection after treatment with induction chemotherapy and subsequent chemo(re)irradiation between January 2010 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Induction chemotherapy consisted of CAPOX/FOLFOX. Endpoints were pathologic response, resection margin and overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and metastasis free survival (MFS).

RESULTS

A pathologic complete response was observed in 22 patients (17%), a "good" response (Mandard 2-3) in 74 patients (56%), and a "poor" response (Mandard 4-5) in 36 patients (27%). An R0 resection was obtained in 83 patients (63%). The degree of pathologic response was linearly correlated with the R0 resection rate (p = 0.026). In patients without synchronous metastases, pathologic response was an independent predictor for LRFS, MFS, and DFS (p = 0.004, p = 0.003, and p = 0.024, respectively), whereas R0 resection was an independent predictor for LRFS and OS (p = 0.020 and p = 0.028, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemotherapy in addition to neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation is a promising treatment strategy for patients with LRRC with high pathologic response rates that translate into improved oncological outcomes, especially when an R0 resection has been achieved.

Long-term outcomes following salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: A 15-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is a complex problem requiring multidisciplinary consultation and specialized surgical care. Given the paucity of published longer-term survival data, skepticism persists regarding the benefit of major extirpative surgery. We investigated ultra-long-term (~15 years) outcomes following radical resection of LRRC and sought relevant clinicopathologic prognostic variables.

METHODS

A cohort of 52 consecutive patients who underwent resection of LRRC at our institution between 1997 and 2005 were followed with serial exams and imaging up to the point of death, or 30/06/2019.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 16.5 years (9.9-18.3) for patients who were alive at last follow-up; only one patient was lost to follow-up, at 9.9 years. For the entire cohort of 52 patients, disease-specific survival (DSS) at 5, 10, and 15 years following salvage surgery was 41%, 33%, and 31%, respectively. All patients who had distant metastatic disease at the time of LRRC resection (n = 6) subsequently died of cancer, at a median of 21 months (4-46). In those without distant metastases at time of salvage surgery (n = 46), DSS at 5, 10, and 15 years was 47%, 38%, and 35%, respectively, median 60 months. Negative resection margin (R0) was independently predictive of superior outcomes. In patients with M0 disease who had R0 resection (n = 37), DSS at 5, 10 and 15 years was 58%, 47%, and 44%, respectively, median 73 months. No patient developed re-recurrence after 5.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates exceptionally durable long-term cancer-free survival following salvage surgery for LRRC, indicating that cure is possible.

Locally recurrent rectal cancer: what the radiologist should know

Despite advances in surgical techniques and chemoradiation therapy, recurrent rectal cancer remains a cause of morbidity and mortality. After successful treatment of rectal cancer, patients are typically enrolled in a surveillance strategy that includes imaging as studies have shown improved prognosis when recurrent rectal cancer is detected during imaging surveillance versus based on development of symptoms. Additionally, patients who experience a complete clinical response with chemoradiation therapy may elect to enroll in a "watch-and-wait" strategy that includes imaging surveillance rather than surgical resection. Factors that increase the likelihood of recurrence, patterns of recurrence, and the imaging appearances of recurrent rectal cancer are reviewed with a focus on CT, PET CT, and MR imaging.

Clinical impact of PET/MR in treated colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate if PET/MR induced management changes versus standard of care imaging (SCI) in treated colorectal cancer patients. The secondary aim was to assess the staging performance of PET/MR and of SCI versus the final oncologic stage.

METHODS

Treated CRC patients who underwent PET/MR with ¹⁸F-FDG and SCI between January 2016 and October 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Their medical records were evaluated to ascertain if PET/MR had impacted on their clinical management versus SCI. The final oncologic stage, as reported in the electronic medical record, was considered the true stage of disease.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients who underwent 42 PET/MR studies were included, mean age 56.7 years (range 39-75 years), 26 males, and 13 females. PET/MR changed clinical management 15/42 times (35.7%, standard error ± 7.4%); these 15 changes in management were due to upstaging in 9/42 (21.5%) and downstaging in 6/42 (14.2%). The differences in management prompted by SCI versus PET/MR were statistically significant, and PET/MR outperformed SCI (P value < 0.001; odds ratio = 2.8). In relation to the secondary outcome, PET/MR outperformed the SCI in accuracy of oncologic staging (P value = 0.016; odds ratio = 4.6).

CONCLUSIONS

PET/MR is a promising imaging tool in the evaluation of treated CRC and might change the management in these patients. However, multicenter prospective studies with larger patient samples are required in order to confirm these preliminary results.

Treatment and survival of locally recurrent rectal cancer: A cross-sectional population study 15 years after the Dutch TME trial

INTRODUCTION

Optimized treatment of primary rectal cancer might have influenced treatment characteristics and outcome of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Subgroup analysis of the Dutch TME trial showed that preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) for the primary tumour was an independent poor prognostic factor after diagnosis of LRRC. This cross-sectional population study aimed to evaluate treatment and overall survival (OS) of LRRC patients, stratified for prior preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) and intention of treatment of LRRC.

METHODS

All patients developing LRRC were selected from a collaborative Snapshot study on 2095 surgically treated rectal cancer patients from 71 Dutch hospitals in the year 2011. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to determine predictors for OS.

RESULTS

A total of 107 LRRC patients (5.1%) were included, of whom 88 (82%) underwent PRT for their primary tumour. LRRC was treated with initial curative intent in 31 patients (29%), with eventual resection in 20 patients (19%). Median OS was 22 and 8 months after curative and palliative intent treatment, respectively (p < 0.001). Initial CRM positivity and palliative intent treatment were associated with worse OS after LRRC, while prior PRT was not.

CONCLUSIONS

This cross-sectional study revealed that rectal cancer patients, who underwent curative resection in the Netherlands in 2011 and subsequently developed local recurrence, were amenable for again curative intent treatment in 29%, with a corresponding median survival of 22 months. Prior PRT was not significantly associated with survival after diagnosis of LRRC.

Results of re-irradiation for pelvic recurrence in anorectal cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes and toxicity profiles after re-irradiation in patients with pelvic recurrence of anorectal cancer.

METHODS

25 anorectal cancer patients who received re-irradiation for pelvic recurrence between 2005 and 2015 were included. For initial treatment, all patients underwent surgical resection and preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 21.5 months (range, 2.9-84.4). After a median of 43.3 months (range, 11.7-218.5), patients received re-irradiation with a median dose of 45 Gy (range, 36-60). The equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of re-irradiation-calculated using α/β = 10 Gy-ranged from 34.5 to 84.0 Gy (median, 46.4). Surgical resection was performed for 11 patients, and 14 patients received concurrent chemotherapy with re-irradiation. The 3-year local progression-free survival was 29.7%. The 3-year overall survival was 49.7%. Concurrent chemotherapy with re-irradiation and re-irradiation doses >50 Gy EQD2_α/β=10 were significant prognostic factors for local progression free survival and overall survival according to multivariate analysis. 90% (9 of 10) of patients with symptoms had improvement after re-irradiation. Among 23 patients available for evaluation of late toxicity, 12 developed late toxicities. There were no Grade 4 late toxicities, and 6 patients had Grade 3 late toxicities (small bowel obstruction, bowel perforation and fistula).

CONCLUSION

Re-irradiation for pelvic recurrence of anorectal cancer improved symptoms of patients but the rate of late toxicity was high. Further investigation for patient selection is required.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Re-irradiation could be considered as a possible option for pelvic recurrence of anorectal cancer in selected patients.