The liver-first approach for locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases

Extent-based tailored strategy for rectal cancer with resectable synchronous liver metastases: Long-term oncologic results of a multicentric cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is no standard surgical management for rectal cancer with synchronous resectable liver metastases. The aim of this study was to assess the oncologic outcomes of an adaptative and individualized strategy considering the extension of both tumoral sites in the management of rectal cancer with synchronous resectable liver metastases.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2020, all consecutive patients treated for low/midrectal cancer with resectable synchronous resectable liver metastases in 4 French centers were included. The choice of strategy was not systematic but tailored on a case-by-case basis to the extension of rectal cancer and liver metastases, prioritizing the most advanced site. The success of the strategy was defined as complete resection of both tumor sites.

RESULTS

Among 83 included patients, most had locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3T4 = 96%) and a median of 3 liver metastases. Forty patients underwent a rectum-first strategy, 31 a liver-first strategy, and 12 a simultaneous resection strategy. Complete resection rate of both sites was 82%. After a 43-month follow-up, median overall survival was 58 months. One- and 3-year survival rates were 94% and 73%, with no difference between strategies (P = .650). In multivariate analysis, the only prognostic factor for overall survival was complete resection of both sites (P = .011, hazard ratio, 0.321; 95% confidence interval, 0.135-0.768), with a median overall survival of 72 months in these patients.

CONCLUSION

Extent-based tailored strategy for rectal cancer with synchronous resectable liver metastases, on the basis of disease extension, allows high rates of complete resection and favorable long-term survival outcomes. This individualized approach maximizes potential for curative outcomes in patients with metastatic rectal cancer.

Pelvic Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients With Synchronous Potentially Treatable Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

The optimal management strategy for Stage IV rectal cancer with potentially treatable liver metastases remains controversial, particularly regarding the role of pelvic radiotherapy (RT).

AIMS

We intend to investigate the impact of pelvic RT on oncological outcomes of rectal cancer with potentially treatable liver metastasis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective study included 83 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases from June 2012 to January 2022. All patients underwent radical surgery for rectal cancer and treatment of synchronous liver metastases, as determined by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). We divided the 83 patients into two treatment groups: chemoradiotherapy and surgery (CRT + S) and chemotherapy and surgery (C + S). The CRT + S group (n = 40) received pelvic RT, systemic therapy, and liver metastasis treatment. The C + S group (n = 43) received systemic therapy and liver metastasis treatment only. A total of 83 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 45 months (range 12-127 months). In the CRT + S group, 48.2% (40/83) of patients underwent chemoradiotherapy, while the C + S group comprised 51.8% (43/83) of patients who received chemotherapy only. The CRT + S group demonstrated significantly longer local recurrence-free survival compared to the C + S group (median 37.5 vs. 34 months; p = 0.011). In addition, patients in the CRT + S group had a longer median overall survival (OS) compared to the C + S group (46.50 vs. 44.0 months; p = 0.0497). Notably, achieving no evidence of disease (NED) status after definitive treatment for both primary and liver metastases was associated with improved OS (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the addition of pelvic RT to multimodality therapy for patients with rectal cancer and potentially treatable liver metastases may improve local control and long-term survival. The findings support the consideration of RT in the clinical management of this patient population.

Liver-first approach to the treatment of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The optimal approach to the treatment of colorectal carcinoma and synchronous liver metastases remains controversial. The objective of this review was to analyze the outcomes of adopting the liver-first approach for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases who initially underwent systemic chemotherapy and/or resection of the metastatic lesions and primary colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for the identification and retrieval of eligible studies. Studies that included details of using the liver-first approach for the treatment of synchronous liver metastases of colorectal cancer and its outcomes, including the patients' survival data, were included. Proportional meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects restricted maximum likelihood method to summarize the three- and five-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the patients.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and fifty-five articles describing the results of studies on the liver-first approach were identified. Three independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of the articles and excluded 750 articles. Thereafter, 29 retrospective and comparative studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. No randomized controlled trials were identified in the database search.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy for hepatic metastasis can prepare a patient for resection of liver metastases, offering the opportunity for potentially curative treatment of synchronous hepatic metastases initially considered unresectable. The decision regarding the resection of primary colorectal carcinoma and liver metastases should be based on individualized patient response. Prospero database registration ID: CRD42022337047 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

Multimodal treatment of rectal cancer with resectable synchronous liver metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Specific studies on stage IV rectal cancer are lacking. The aim of this study is to describe the current status of rectum-first approach (RFA), liver-first approach (LFA) and simultaneous approach (SA) in these patients.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane including studies published from January 2005 to January 2021. Studies on colon cancer only, colon and rectal cancer without distinction, extrahepatic metastases at diagnosis, or case reports/letters were excluded. Main outcomes were 5-yr overall survival (OS) and treatment completion rates.

RESULTS

22 studies were included for a total of 1,653 patients. 77% of the studies were retrospective and mainly (59%) reported one treatment approach. The primary endpoint was declared in 27% of the studies. Irrespective of treatment approaches, the 5-yr OS rate was reported in 72% of the studies. The 5-yr OS rates ranged from 38.5% to 75% for LFA, from 28% and 80% for RFA and from 28.2% to 77.3% for SA. Treatment completion rates ranged from 50% to 100% for LFA, from 37% to 100% for RFA, and from 66% to 100% for SA.

CONCLUSION

The wide heterogeneity of the results reflects that the therapeutic strategy in this setting is a case-by-case multidisciplinary decision and depends on several patient-specific features.

Organ sparing to cure stage IV rectal cancer: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Rectal sparing is an option for some rectal cancers with complete or good response after chemoradiotherapy (CRT); however, it has never been evaluated in patients with metastases. We assessed long-term outcomes of a rectal-sparing approach in a liver-first strategy for patients with rectal cancer with resectable liver metastases.

CASE SUMMARY

We examined patients who underwent an organ-sparing approach for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases using a liver-first strategy during 2010-2015 (n = 8). Patients received primary chemotherapy and pelvic CRT. Liver surgery was performed during the interval between CRT completion and rectal tumor re-evaluation. Clinical and oncological characteristics and long-term outcomes were assessed.All patients underwent liver metastatic resection with curative intent. The R0 rate was 100%. Six and two patients underwent local excision and a watch-and-wait (WW) approach, respectively. All patients had T3N1 tumors at diagnosis and had good clinical response after CRT. The median survival time was 60 (range, 14-127) mo. Three patients were disease free for 5, 8, and 10 years after the procedure. Five patients developed metastatic recurrence in the liver (n = 5) and/or lungs (n = 2). Only one patient developed local recurrence concurrent with metastatic recurrence 24 mo after the WW approach. Two patients died during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest good local control in patients undergoing organ-sparing strategies for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. Prospective trials are required to validate these data and identify good candidates for these strategies.

Hepatectomy Before Primary Tumor Resection as Preferred Approach for Synchronous Liver Metastases from Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

For patients with synchronous liver metastases (LM) from rectal cancer, a consensus on surgical sequencing is lacking. We compared outcomes between the reverse (hepatectomy first), classic (primary tumor resection first), and combined (simultaneous hepatectomy and primary tumor resection) approaches.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was queried for patients with rectal cancer LM diagnosed before primary tumor resection who underwent hepatectomy for LM from January 2004 to April 2021. Clinicopathological factors and survival were compared between the three approaches.

RESULTS

Among 274 patients, 141 (51%) underwent the reverse approach; 73 (27%), the classic approach; and 60 (22%), the combined approach. Higher carcinoembryonic antigen level at LM diagnosis and higher number of LM were associated with the reverse approach. Combined approach patients had smaller tumors and underwent less complex hepatectomies. More than eight cycles of pre-hepatectomy chemotherapy and maximum diameter of LM > 5 cm were independently associated with worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.002 and 0.027, respectively). Although 35% of reverse-approach patients did not undergo primary tumor resection, OS did not differ between groups. Additionally, 82% of incomplete reverse-approach patients ultimately did not require diversion during follow-up. RAS/TP53 co-mutation was independently associated with lack of primary resection with the reverse approach (odds ratio: 0.16, 95% CI 0.038-0.64, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The reverse approach results in survival similar to that of combined and classic approaches and may obviate primary rectal tumor resections and diversions. RAS/TP53 co-mutation is associated with a lower rate of completion of the reverse approach.

An optimised liver-first strategy for synchronous metastatic rectal cancer leads to higher protocol completion and lower surgical morbidity

INTRODUCTION

The optimal management of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases remains debatable. Thus, we propose an optimised liver-first (OLF) strategy that combines concomitant pelvic irradiation with hepatic management. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and oncological quality of the OLF strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients underwent systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by preoperative radiotherapy. Liver resection was performed in one step (between radiotherapy and rectal surgery) or in two steps (before and after radiotherapy). The data were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively as intent to treat.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2018, 24 patients underwent the OLF strategy. The rate of treatment completion was 87.5%. Three patients (12.5%) did not proceed to the planned second-stage liver and rectal surgery because of progressive disease. The postoperative mortality rate was 0%, and the overall morbidity rates after liver and rectal surgeries were 21% and 28.6%, respectively. Only two patients developed severe complications. Liver and rectal complete resection was performed in 100% and 84.6%, respectively. A rectal-sparing strategy was performed in 6 patients who underwent local excision (n = 4) or a watch and wait strategy (n = 2). Among patients who completed treatment, the median overall and disease-free survivals were 60 months (range 12-139 months) and 40 months (range 10-139 months), respectively. Eleven patients (47.6%) developed recurrence, among whom five underwent further treatment with curative intent.

CONCLUSION

The OLF approach is feasible, relevant, and safe. Organ preservation was feasible for a quarter of patients and may be associated with reduced morbidity.

H.BuijsenJeroenFestenSebastiaande GraafEelco J. R.HaakHester E.HillingDenise E.HoffChristiaanIntvenMartijnKomenNielsKustersMirandavan LeerdamMonique E.PeetersKoen C. M. J.PetersFemke P.PronkApollovan der SandeMarit E.SchreursWilhelmina H.SonneveldDirk J. A.TalsmaAalbert K.TuynmanJurriaan B.Valkenburg‐van IerselLiselot B. J.VermaasMaartende Vos‐GeelenJudithvan WestreenenHenderik L.de WiltJohannes H. W.ZimmermanDavid D. E., Buijsen J, Festen S, de Graaf EJR, Haak HE, Hilling DE, Hoff C, Intven M, Komen N, Kusters M, van Leerdam ME, Peeters KCMJ, Peters FP, Pronk A, van der Sande ME, Schreurs WH, Sonneveld DJA, Talsma AK, Tuynman JB, Valkenburg‐van Iersel LBJ, Vermaas M, de Vos‐Geelen J, van Westreenen HL, de Wilt JHW, Zimmerman DDE. Selected stage IV rectal cancer patients managed by the watch-and-wait approach after pelvic radiotherapy: a good alternative to total mesorectal excision surgery?

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and oncological outcome of a selected group of stage IV rectal cancer patients managed by the watch-and-wait approach following a (near-)complete response of the primary rectal tumour after radiotherapy.

METHOD

Patients registered in the Dutch watch-and-wait registry since 2004 were selected when diagnosed with synchronous stage IV rectal cancer. Data on patient characteristics, treatment details, follow-up and survival were collected. The 2-year local regrowth rate, organ-preservation rate, colostomy-free rate, metastatic progression-free rate and 2- and 5-year overall survival were analysed.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 35 months, local regrowth was observed in 17 patients (40.5%). Nine patients underwent subsequent total mesorectal excision, resulting in a permanent colostomy in four patients. The 2-year local regrowth rate was 39.9%, the 2-year organ-preservation rate was 77.1%, the 2-year colostomy-free rate was 88.1%, and the 2-year metastatic progression-free rate was 46.7%. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.0% and 67.5%.

CONCLUSION

The watch-and-wait approach can be considered as an alternative to total mesorectal excision in a selected group of stage IV rectal cancer patients with a (near-)complete response following pelvic radiotherapy. Despite a relatively high regrowth rate, total mesorectal excision and a permanent colostomy can be avoided in the majority of these patients.

The liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of completion rates and effects on survival

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with synchronous colorectal liver metastases are increasingly being considered for a curative treatment, and the liver-first approach is gaining popularity in this context. However, little is known about the completion rates of the liver-first approach and its effects on survival.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of liver-first strategy for colorectal liver metastasis. The primary outcome was an assessment of the completion rates of the liver-first approach. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, causes of non-completion, and clinicopathologic data.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles were amenable for inclusion and the total study population was 1041. The median completion rate for the total population was 80% (range 20-100). The median overall survival for the completion and non-completion groups was 45 (range 12-69) months and 13 (range 10.5-25) months, respectively. Metadata showed a significant survival benefit for the completion group, with a univariate hazard ratio of 12.0 (95% confidence interval, range 5.7-24.4). The major cause of non-completion (76%) was liver disease progression before resection of the primary tumor. Pearson tests showed significant negative correlation between median number of lesions and median size of the largest metastasis and completion rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The liver-first approach offers a complete resection to most patients enrolled, with an overall survival benefit when completion can be assured. One-fifth fails to return to intended oncologic therapy and the major cause is interim metastatic progression, most often in the liver. Risk of non-completion is related to a higher number of lesions and large metastases. The majority of studies stem from primary rectal cancers, which may influence on the return to intended oncologic therapy as well.PROSPERO id no: 170459.

No benefit after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in stage IV rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis on a real-world population

BACKGROUND

Stage IV rectal cancer occurs in 25% of patients and locoregional control of primary tumor is usually poorly considered, since priority is the treatment of metastatic disease.

AIMS

This study evaluates impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCHRTS) vs. upfront surgery on locoregional control and overall survival in stage IV rectal cancer.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with stage IV rectal carcinoma between 2009 and 2019, undergone elective surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (Italy), were included. Propensity score-based matching was performed between the two study groups. Loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meyer method.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were analyzed. After propensity score matching, 88 patients were included in the final analysis. The 3-yr LRRFS rates were 80.3% for nCHRTS vs. 90.4% for upfront surgery patients (p = 0.35). The 3-yr OS rates were respectively 81.8% vs. 58% (p = 0.36). KRAS mutation (HR 2.506, p = 0.038) and extra-liver metastases (HR 4.308, p = 0.003) were both predictive of worse OS in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The present study failed to demonstrate a significant impact of nCHRTS on LRRFS or OS in stage IV rectal cancer.

Upfront chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and oncologic outcomes of upfront chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.

METHODS

Forty-four patients who underwent upfront chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3/4, <2.0 mm from the mesorectal fascia) with synchronous liver metastases between January 2010 and June 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Primary and metastatic liver lesions were resected with curative intent. Upfront chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy were administered. Thereafter, restaging, surgery only, or additional chemotherapy followed by surgery was performed.

RESULTS

At the time of initial diagnosis, 20 patients had <3 liver metastases; 24 patients had ≥3 liver metastases. Twenty-three patients had hemi-liver metastases; 21 patients had bilobar liver metastases. R0 resection of rectal lesions was achieved in 43 patients. Synchronous R0 resection of liver metastases was achieved in 41 patients. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ III) were noted in 5 patients. Grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in 26 patients. All adverse events were managed effectively with medication and supportive care. The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 65.3% and 26.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Upfront chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery appear to be safe and effective in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases without substantially increasing treatment induced morbidity.

Laparoscopic staged colon-first resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: Perioperative and midterm outcomes from a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed to evaluate the short- and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic colon-first staged resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM).

METHODS

This study included patients with metastatic CRC who underwent laparoscopic surgical staged resection for the primary tumor and CRCLM between June 2013 and December 2018. Data collection included the baseline patient's and tumor features, the perioperative and histopathologic outcomes from both surgical procedures, and the oncologic follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were eligible for the study. Three major and 22 minor laparoscopic liver resections were performed following laparoscopic CRC surgery. Five patients required conversion to laparotomy during CRCLM resection, but no conversion was needed for the colorectal procedures. The rate of severe intraoperative complications (CLASSIC grade III-IV) was 8% and 16% during CRC and CRCLM resection, respectively. Three patients (12%) developed major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > III) after both interventions, including one death due to intraoperative bleeding. During a median follow-up of 30 months, 15 patients were diagnosed with disease recurrence. The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 33.3% and 73.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic staged resection for CRC and CRCLM is safe, feasible, and offers acceptable midterm oncological outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Multicentre study of short-course radiotherapy, systemic therapy and resection/ablation for stage IV rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment sequence for patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of short-course pelvic radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) followed by systemic therapy and local treatment of all tumour sites in patients with potentially curable stage IV rectal cancer in daily practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study performed in eight tertiary referral centres in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18 years or above with rectal cancer and potentially resectable liver ± extrahepatic metastases, treated between 2010 and 2015, were eligible. Main outcomes included full completion of treatment schedule, symptom control and survival.

RESULTS

In total, 169 patients were included with a median follow-up of 49·5 (95 pr cent c.i. 43·6 to 55·6) months. The completion rate for the entire treatment schedule was 65·7 per cent. Three-year progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were 24·2 (95 per cent c.i. 16·6 to 31·6) and 48·8 (40·4 to 57·2) per cent respectively. Median OS of patients who responded well and completed the treatment schedule was 51·5 months, compared with 15·1 months for patients who did not complete the treatment (P < 0·001). Adequate symptom control of the primary tumour was achieved in 87·0 per cent of all patients.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal treatment leads to relief of symptoms in most patients, and is associated with good survival rates in those able to complete the schedule. [Correction added on 12 February 2020, after first online publication: the Conclusion has been reworded for clarity].