1
|
Vanmaele A, Rastogi V, Oliveira-Pinto J, Ten Raa S, van Rijn MJE, Bastos Gonçalves F, de Bruin JL, Verhagen HJM. Single Centre Evaluation of the Proposal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Guidelines to Stratify Surveillance after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2025; 69:744-754. [PMID: 39909310 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 02/07/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare methods that identify patients at low risk of developing complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and who would thus not require surveillance in the first post-operative years. METHODS This was a retrospective, single centre, cohort study including all patients after elective infrarenal EVAR with both immediate post-operative and one year computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging. Patients were categorised by adherence to instructions for use (IFU), adequate seal, and absence of endoleak (method A1), and without high risk features (method A2) on the first post-operative CTA. Additionally, these patients were dichotomised based on aneurysm sac shrinkage at one year (> 5 mm maximum diameter reduction, method B). Outcomes were graft related adverse events and all cause death. Negative predictive value (NPV) was used to compare risk classifications. RESULTS Of 422 eligible patients, 297 underwent the required imaging for classification: 140 (47.1%) and 109 (36.7%) patients were classified as low risk based on methods A1 and A2, respectively, while 147 (49.5%) were assumed low risk based on method B. The five year cumulative incidence of adverse events in low risk patients according to method A1 was 14.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5 - 20.9%), similar to method A2 (16.1%, 95% CI 8.8 - 23.4%) and method B (15.4%, 95% CI 9.3 - 21.5%). The five year median NPV for adverse events for method A1 was 85.2% (95% CI 79.7 - 90.8%), comparable with method A2 (83.8%, 95% CI 76.9 - 90.3%; p = .37) and method B (84.7%, 95% CI 79.4 - 89.5%; p = .87). Significantly higher NPVs were found by combining method A1 or A2 with method B, with median values ≥ 95% up to four years after EVAR. The five year NPV for death did not differ between methods (five year NPVmethod A1, 81.7%, 95% CI 76.6 - 86.5%). CONCLUSION Refraining from imaging in the first five years after EVAR in patients treated within IFU and with a favourable post-operative CTA would have failed to detect important complications at an early stage. It is proposed to combine the post-operative CTA with sac shrinkage at one year in order to stratify post-EVAR surveillance. No benefit was found in considering the high risk features suggested in the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Vanmaele
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Vinamr Rastogi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - José Oliveira-Pinto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Unidade Local de Saúde de Trás os Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal; Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Oporto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sander Ten Raa
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Frederico Bastos Gonçalves
- NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jorg L de Bruin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jácome F, Ribeiro B, Rocha-Neves J, Teixeira JF, Dias-Neto M. Secondary interventions and surveillance after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2025; 66:120-132. [PMID: 40372104 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.25.13183-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The early survival benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) appear to diminish over time, and late aneurysm-related mortality remains a significant concern. Our aim is to determine the rate of secondary interventions (SI) and assess compliance with post-EVAR surveillance. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent elective EVAR between February 2009 and May 2019 at a tertiary center. The primary outcomes were freedom from SI and compliance with follow-up (imaging performed within a time interval of no more than 18 months). Secondary outcome was overall patient survival. RESULTS A total of 214 patients underwent EVAR, with a median follow-up of 44 months. During this period, 42 SI were performed in 25 patients. Of all SI, 33.3% (14/42) were due to symptomatic complications. Freedom from SI was 96.3±1.3% at 30 days and 93.6±1.7%, 90.3±2.2% and 85.9±3.0 at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Endoleaks were the main cause of SI after EVAR (N.=26), primarily type 1 and type 2. At 5 years, patient survival rates were similar (76.7±4.1% vs. 84.4±7.2%, P=0.386). Compliance with surveillance was 80.4±2.9% at 1 year, and 37.7±5.4% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS SI after EVAR were frequent, with endoleaks being the leading cause and associated with cases of aneurysm sac rupture. Although compliance with surveillance decreases over longer follow-up periods, the impact of this trend on long-term outcomes after EVAR warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Jácome
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Local Health Unit of São João, Porto, Portugal -
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal -
| | | | - João Rocha-Neves
- Unit of Anatomy, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - José F Teixeira
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Local Health Unit of São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Marina Dias-Neto
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Local Health Unit of São João, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cardiovascular R&D Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grima MJ, Ancetti S, Pherwani AD, Gonçalves FB, Budtz-Lilly J, Behrendt CA, Scali ST, Beck AW, Mani K. Standards for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Quality Improvement Registries: A Delphi Consensus Report From VASCUNET and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2025; 69:516-521. [PMID: 39638234 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 09/22/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Outcome registries in vascular surgery are used increasingly to drive quality improvement by vascular societies. The VASCUNET collaboration, within the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS), and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries (ICVR) developed a set of variables for quality improvement registries on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair as a registry standard. METHODS Representatives from international vascular registries within VASCUNET, ICVR, and other nations with established registries were invited to provide the variables. The final variables were developed through a two stage modified Delphi process. Variables from the established registries with at least 60% consensus among all the registries were included for round 1. A five point Likert scale (strongly disagree to fully agree) was used. If the limit of consensual agreement was not reached in round 1, the variable was discussed again in round 2. For round 2, an array question method (yes, no to unsure) was used. Agreement of at least 70% resulted in the variable being included in the final dataset. RESULTS A total of 88 of 371 variables extracted from all AAA registries were circulated in the modified Delphi process as they reached the 60% consensus threshold. The questionnaire was circulated to 55 participants (round 1: 49; 89%; round 2: 43; 78%). After two rounds, 70 variables were recommended on consensual agreement. These variables comprised demographics (n = 4), pre-operative information (n = 28), intra-operative variables (n = 18), post-operative variables (n = 5), and follow up (n = 13). CONCLUSION Based on this modified Delphi process, an international panel of vascular surgeons representing quality improvement registries recommended 70 core variables as standard in AAA repair registries. The inclusion of a core set of variables in AAA vascular registries may help to further harmonise observational research and quality of AAA repair among global healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Joe Grima
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, L-iMsida, Malta.
| | | | - Arun D Pherwani
- Keele University School of Medicine, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| | - Frederico B Gonçalves
- NOVA Medical School - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, (NMS|FCM), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jacob Budtz-Lilly
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christian-Alexander Behrendt
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Asklepios Clinic Wandsbek, Asklepios Medical School, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Salvatore T Scali
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Tongeren OLRM, Vanmaele A, Rastogi V, Hoeks SE, Verhagen HJM, de Bruin JL. Volume Measurements for Surveillance after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair using Artificial Intelligence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2025; 69:61-70. [PMID: 39237055 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.08.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 08/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is suboptimal due to limited compliance and relatively large variability in measurement methods of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac size after treatment. Measuring volume offers a more sensitive early indicator of aneurysm sac growth or regression and stability, but is more time consuming and thus less practical than measuring maximum diameter. This study evaluated the accuracy and consistency of the artificial intelligence (AI) driven software PRAEVAorta 2 and compared it with an established semi-automated segmentation method. METHODS Post-EVAR aneurysm sac volumes measured by AI were compared with a semi-automated segmentation method (3mensio software) in patients with an infrarenal AAA, focusing on absolute aneurysm volume and volume evolution over time. The clinical impact of both methods was evaluated by categorising patients as showing either AAA sac regression, stabilisation, or growth comparing the 30 day and one year post-EVAR computed tomography angiography (CTA) images. Inter- and intra-method agreement were assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Cohen's κ statistic. RESULTS Forty nine patients (98 CTA images) were analysed, after excluding 15 patients due to segmentation errors by AI owing to low quality CT scans. Aneurysm sac volume measurements showed excellent correlation (ICC = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 - 0.99) with good to excellent correlation for volume evolution over time (ICC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 - 0.91). Categorisation of AAA sac evolution showed fair correlation (Cohen's κ = 0.33), with 12 discrepancies (24%) between methods. The intra-method agreement for the AI software demonstrated perfect consistency (bias = -0.01 cc), indicating that it is more reliable compared with the semi-automated method. CONCLUSION Despite some differences in AAA sac volume measurements, the highly consistent AI driven software accurately measured AAA sac volume evolution. AAA sac evolution classification appears to be more reliable than existing methods and may therefore improve risk stratification post-EVAR, and could facilitate AI driven personalised surveillance programmes. While high quality CTA images are crucial, considering radiation exposure is important, validating the software with non-contrast CT scans might reduce the radiation burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexander Vanmaele
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vinamr Rastogi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne E Hoeks
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hence J M Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jorg L de Bruin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scicluna R, Grima MJ. Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Surveillance Program Driven by Artificial Intelligence: Is This the Holy Grail of Surveillance? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2025; 69:71-72. [PMID: 39342983 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Scicluna
- Department of General Surgery, Vascular Unit, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Matthew Joe Grima
- Department of General Surgery, Vascular Unit, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghoddusi Johari H, Ranjbar K, Kassaee K, Hoseini SM, Shahriarirad R. Evaluation of Aneurysm Cases Undergoing Surgery at a Tertiary Center in Iran: A 22-year Retrospective Study. Health Sci Rep 2025; 8:e70331. [PMID: 39777283 PMCID: PMC11705405 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims An arterial aneurysm is characterized by a localized expansion of a blood vessel relative to its original dimensions. Specifically, an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is identified as an aortic diameter measuring at least one and a half times the standard diameter at the renal artery level, approximately equivalent to 2.0 cm. In this study, we aim to evaluate the prevalence of AAA, along with the clinical features, trend, and incidence of ruptured AAA among patients undergoing surgery in our center. Methods The database of patients operated in Namazi Hospital from 2000 to 2021 was retrieved and patients undergoing vascular surgeries due to aneurysm were reviewed. All data were analyzed with SPSS version 26.0. Results A total of 599 cases of aneurysm were operated, among which 334 were contributed to the aorta and included in our study. The average age of the participants was 69.6 (SD: 12.1, range 16-93) years and 161 (85.2%) were male. The majority of cases were in the 60 to 80 years age group (n = 205; 62.5%). There was a significant association between the age groups and the AAA rupture (p = 0.003), with the highest occurrence among the above 80 years age group (n = 37, 49.3%). Regarding the location of the aneurysm, 274 were located in the infrarenal and abdominal region, 21 in the thoracoabdominal region, and 12 in the thoracic region. Among the cases in our study, 112 were cases of ruptured aneurysms. Furthermore, the age of patients with ruptured aneurysm were significantly higher compared to non-ruptured patients (71.8 vs. 68.5; p = 0.019). Conclusion We observed an increase in the incidence of AAA surgeries in our center throughout the years, with the population growing towards younger population, while the incidence of rupture increasing towards older age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Ghoddusi Johari
- Vascular Surgery DepartmentShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
- Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research CenterShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
| | - Keivan Ranjbar
- Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research CenterShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular CenterTufts Medical CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kimia Kassaee
- School of MedicineIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | | | - Reza Shahriarirad
- Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research CenterShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Setia K, Otoya D, Boyd S, Fong K, Amendola MF, Lavingia KS. Socioeconomic Status Based on Area Deprivation Index Does Not Affect Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the VA Health-Care System. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 109:245-255. [PMID: 39067846 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living conditions and socioeconomic status are known to impact individual health and access to medical care. Prior research has validated the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) tool as a measure of socioeconomic disadvantage for a given locality. Living in a neighborhood with a higher ADI score has been associated with increased rates of hospital readmission due to complications following surgery. We set forth to identify the possible associations between a patient's ADI score and postoperative endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes in the Veterans Health Care Administration (VHA). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients who underwent EVAR from January 2010 to December 2021 at a level 1A VHA Hospital. Patient demographics and intraoperative variables were obtained. ADI score was calculated based on home addresses and resulted in a local score on a scale of 1-10 and a national percentile on a scale of 1-100. We then further stratified these patients into local and national quintile groups. Local ADI 1 included scores of 1-2, and local ADI 5 included scores of 9-10. National ADI 1 comprised scores 1-20, and national ADI 5 scored 81-100. The other scores were equally divided into ADI 2, 3, and 4. Higher ADI scores were associated with lower socioeconomic status. We identified clinical outcomes, including wound infection, respiratory failure, urinary tract infection, acute kidney injury, limb stenosis, readmission, length of stay, and subsequent reintervention rates. RESULTS 241 patients underwent EVAR over the time period examined. 57.3% (n = 138) of patients were in quintiles 4 and 5 for local ADI; when national ADI percentiles organized these same patients, 47.3% (n = 114) were in quintiles 4 and 5. Patient demographics did not vary between the local and national groups. We saw no statistically significant difference in intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, readmission, loss to follow-up, or 1-year mortality rates across ADI quintiles at the local or national level. Binary Logistic Regression showed no statistical significance for local and national ADI quintiles for hospital readmission and overall postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS We found that there was no statistical significance between hospital readmission rates or worse surgical outcomes across local and national ADI quintiles. This suggests that the VHA resources and multidisciplinary support may improve care across neighborhoods. This comprehensive care provided at VHA may mitigate postoperative complications in patients undergoing EVARs. Further research is warranted to investigate the role of area deprivation in health care and EVAR outcomes in a veteran population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karishma Setia
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
| | - Diana Otoya
- Virginia Commonwealth University Healthcare System, Richmond, VA
| | - Sally Boyd
- Virginia Commonwealth University Healthcare System, Richmond, VA
| | - Kathryn Fong
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; Central Virginia VA Healthcare System, Richmond, VA
| | - Michael F Amendola
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; Central Virginia VA Healthcare System, Richmond, VA
| | - Kedar S Lavingia
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; Central Virginia VA Healthcare System, Richmond, VA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schutt J, Bohr NL, Cao K, Pocivavsek L, Milner R. Social Determinants of Health Factors and Loss-To-Follow-Up in the Field of Vascular Surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 105:316-324. [PMID: 38609010 PMCID: PMC12080956 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is estimated that 22-57% of vascular patients are lost to follow-up (LTF) which is of concern as the Society of Vascular Surgery recommends annual patient follow-up. The purpose of this report was to identify social determinants of health factors (SDoH) and their relationship to LTF in vascular patients. METHODS The methods employed were a systematic literature review of 29 empirical articles and a retrospective quality improvement report with 27 endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) patients at the University of Chicago. RESULTS The systematic literature review resulted in 2,931 articles which were reduced to 29 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Demographic variables were more frequently cited than SDoH factors, but the most common were smoking, transportation, and socioeconomic status/insurance. Additionally, 176 EVAR and TEVAR patients were called resulting in 27 patients who completed a SDoH questionnaire. Twenty-six percent indicated they had missed at least 1 appointment with the top reasons being work or family responsibilities. Due to limited patient size no statistical analyses were performed, but frequencies of responses to SDoH questions were reported to augment the existing limited literature and guide future research into variables such as one's ability to pay for basics like food or mortgage. CONCLUSIONS SDoH factors are important yet understudied aspects of endovascular repairs that require more research to understand their impact on vascular surgery follow-up rates and outcomes. Additional research is needed as lack of consideration of such factors may impact the generalizability of existing research and such knowledge may help in informing clinician treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathon Schutt
- Midwestern University Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Downers Grove, IL.
| | - Nicole L Bohr
- Department of Nursing Research, UChicago Medicine, Chicago, IL; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Kathleen Cao
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Ross Milner
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wolf S, Ashouri Y, Succar B, Hsu CH, Abuhakmeh Y, Goshima K, Devito P, Zhou W. Follow-up compliance in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at Veterans Affairs hospitals. J Vasc Surg 2024; 80:89-95. [PMID: 38462060 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend annual imaging surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and every 5 years following open surgical repairs (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Adherence to these guidelines is low outside of clinical trials, and compliance at Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals is not yet well-established. We examined imaging follow-up compliance and mortality rates after AAA repair at VA hospitals. METHODS We queried the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for elective infrarenal AAA repairs, EVAR and OSR, then merged in follow-up imaging and mortality information. Mortality rate over time was derived using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Generalized estimating equation with a logit link and a sandwich standard error estimate was performed to compare the probability of having annual follow-up imaging over time between procedure types and to identify variables associated with follow-up imaging for EVAR patients. RESULTS Our analysis included 11,668 patients who underwent EVAR and 4507 patients who underwent OSR at VA hospitals between the years 2000 and 2019. The 30-day mortality rate for EVAR and OSR was 0.37% and 0.82%, respectively. OSR was associated with lower long-term mortality after adjusting age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and preoperative renal failure with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.92; P < .01). Of surviving patients, the follow-up imaging rate was 69.1% by 1 year post-EVAR. The follow-up rate after 5 years was 45.6% post-EVAR compared with 63.6% post-OSR of surviving patients. A history of smoking or drinking, baseline hypertension, and known cardiac disease were independently associated with poor follow-up after EVAR. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing elective open AAA repair in the VA hospital system had lower long-term mortality compared with patients who underwent endovascular repair. Compliance with post-EVAR imaging is low. Patient factors associated with poor post-EVAR imaging surveillance were smoking within the last year, excess alcohol consumption, and cardiac risk factors including hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sona Wolf
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ
| | - Yazan Ashouri
- University of Arizona, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tucson, AZ
| | - Bahaa Succar
- University of Arizona, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tucson, AZ
| | - Chiu-Hsieh Hsu
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Yousef Abuhakmeh
- University of Arizona, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tucson, AZ
| | - Karou Goshima
- University of Arizona, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tucson, AZ
| | - Peter Devito
- University of Arizona, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tucson, AZ
| | - Wei Zhou
- University of Arizona, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tucson, AZ.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Banks CA, Slay L, Williams BR, Sargent E, Alabi O, Jackson EA, Spangler E. Exploring how military culture shapes veterans' perception of aortic aneurysm repair: A qualitative study. Vascular 2024:17085381241262130. [PMID: 38877806 DOI: 10.1177/17085381241262130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Veterans represent a distinct cultural group whose perceptions of illness and treatment are influenced by military culture. The study explores how prior military service shapes Veterans' assumptions and behaviors in the setting of aneurysm repair surgery. STUDY DESIGN We conducted content and thematic analysis of a case series of 10 transcripts from telephone interviews with older (76.7 ± 4.3 years) African American and White male Veterans now residing in the Southern U.S. who underwent open or endovascular aneurysm surgery at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers or university affiliates between 2004 and2019. RESULTS Throughout the continuum of care, Veterans described deferring to authority and not questioning provider's decisions ["I just can't make a judgment on that, because I'm not a doctor"]. Veterans valued commitment and articulated pride in keeping logistically challenging surveillance appointments [I always took them very seriously. . . If I'm scheduled for something by the doctor, I always make it."]. The routine structure of VA care aligned with Veterans military experiences, facilitating compliance with doctor's orders. However, procedural deviations in VA care were disconcerting for patients ["They haven't reached out to me in at least three years, since my surgery; I was being seen once a year and then all of a sudden, they just quit."]. While Veterans praised VA care, they exhibited sensitivity to signs of untoward treatment from clinical and support staff "…my surgeon, he never talked to me before, nor after, no anytime…I thought that maybe that wasn't right". CONCLUSIONS Military culture embodies rank, order, and respect, and remains a source of strength and stability for Veterans in their medical care late in life. Cultural competency about how military service has shaped Veterans' expectations can enhance providers' awareness of patients' military mindsets and inform surgeons' efforts to engage Veterans in shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Adam Banks
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Laurie Slay
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Beverly R Williams
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama Division of Gerontology, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Emily Sargent
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Olamide Alabi
- School of Medicine Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Jackson
- Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Emily Spangler
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bastos Gonçalves F, Wanhainen A. The One Size Fits All EVAR Follow Up Has Proven Unsuccessful and Is a Thing of the Past. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:703-704. [PMID: 38521189 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Frederico Bastos Gonçalves
- Hospital de Santa Marta, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Hospital CUF Tejo, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical and Peri-operative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rakemaa L, Aho PS, Tulamo R, Laine MT, Laukontaus SJ, Hakovirta H, Venermo M. Ultrasound Surveillance is Feasible After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 100:223-232. [PMID: 37926137 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.09.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is traditionally done with computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans that exposes patient to radiation, nephrotoxic contrast media, and potentially increased risk for cancer. Ultrasound (US) is less labor intensive and expensive and might thus provide a good alternative for CTA surveillance. The aim of this study was to evaluate in real-life patient cohorts whether US is able to detect post-EVAR aneurysm-related complications similarly to CTA. METHODS This retrospective study compared the outcome of consecutive patients who underwent EVAR for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm and were surveilled solely by CTA (CTA-only cohort, n = 168) in 2000-2010 or by combined CTA and US (CTA/US cohort, n = 300) in 2011-2016, as a standard surveillance protocol in the department of vascular surgery, Helsinki University Hospital. The CTA-only patients were imaged at 1, 3, and 12 months and annually thereafter. The CTA/US patients were imaged with CTA at 3 and 12 months, US at 6 months and annually thereafter. If there were suspicion of >5 mm aneurysm growth, CTA scan was performed. The patients were reviewed for imaging data, reinterventions, aneurysm ruptures, and death until December 2018. The 2 groups were compared for secondary rupture, aneurysm-related and cancer-related death, reintervention related to abdominal aortic aneurysm, and maximum aneurysm diameter increase ≥5 mm. The mean follow-up in the CTA-only cohort was 67 months and in CTA/US cohort 43 months. RESULTS The 2 cohorts were alike for basic characteristics and for the mean aneurysm diameter. The total number of CT scans for detecting aneurysm was 84.1/100 patient years in the CTA-only cohort compared to 74.5/100 patient years for US/CTA cohort. Forty percent of patients under combined CTA/US surveillance received 1 or more additional CTA scans. The 2 cohorts did not differ for 1-year, 5-year and 8-year freedom from aneurysm related death, secondary sac rupture, nor the incidence of rupture preventing interventions. CONCLUSIONS Based on the follow-up data of this real-life cohort of 468 patients, combined surveillance with US and additional CTA either per protocol or due to suspicion of aneurysm-related complications had comparable outcome with sole CTA-surveillance. Thus, US can be considered a reasonable alternative for the CTA. However, our study showed also that the need of additional CTAs due to suspicion of endoleak or aneurysm nonrelated reasons is substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotta Rakemaa
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
| | - Pekka S Aho
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
| | - Riikka Tulamo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
| | - Matti T Laine
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
| | - Sani J Laukontaus
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
| | - Harri Hakovirta
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland; Department of Surgery, Satasairaala Hospital, Pori, Satakunta, Finland
| | - Maarit Venermo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Bellmunt Montoya S, Berard X, Boyle JR, D'Oria M, Prendes CF, Karkos CD, Kazimierczak A, Koelemay MJW, Kölbel T, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell JT, Trimarchi S, Tsilimparis N, Antoniou GA, Björck M, Coscas R, Dias NV, Kolh P, Lepidi S, Mees BME, Resch TA, Ricco JB, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Branzan D, Cheng SWK, Dalman RL, Dick F, Golledge J, Haulon S, van Herwaarden JA, Ilic NS, Jawien A, Mastracci TM, Oderich GS, Verzini F, Yeung KK. Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:192-331. [PMID: 38307694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 338] [Impact Index Per Article: 338.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy. METHODS The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence. RESULTS A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed. CONCLUSION The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.
Collapse
|
14
|
Singh B, Andersson M, Edsfeldt A, Sonesson B, Gunnarsson M, Dias NV. Estimation of the Added Cancer Risk Derived From EVAR and CTA Follow-Up. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231219435. [PMID: 38140719 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231219435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the risk of radiation-induced cancer development in patients that have undergone an infrarenal EVAR, stratifying the relative contributions of the procedure and the preoperative and postoperative CTAs. METHODS AND MATERIALS The organ-specific absorbed radiation doses from CTA and the EVAR procedure were estimated from the radiation exposures of 95 and 45 male patients, respectively. Lifetime attributable risk (LAR) cancer predictions were calculated for 14 different organs. Life expectancy was assumed from a previous cohort of patients undergoing infra-renal EVAR. RESULTS The calculated total excess cancer risk was 0.0046, ie, 1 out of 220 patients will develop a neoplasm after being exposed to the ionizing radiation from the preoperative CTA, the EVAR and annual CTA examinations for 15 years. The procedure and the preoperative CTA contributed with 38% of the total excess risk, while the rest was derived from the follow-up. If the entire CTA based follow-up would have been eliminated, an excess risk of 0.0018 (1/560) would remain. CONCLUSIONS 1 out of 219 patients who have undergone EVAR of an infra-renal AAA have a lifetime risk of developing cancer secondary to the radiation exposures related to the procedure and the CTAs used preoperatively and during follow-up. This risk derives mostly from the yearly postoperative CTAs, underlining the potential benefits of reducing or replacing their use. CLINICAL IMPACT A simulation-based estimation reinforced the potential deleterious effects of the radiation exposure for patients undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) and subsequently followed by yearly Computer Tomography Angiographies (CTAs). The risk could be as high as 1 out 219 patients developing a neoplasm after 15 years. The largest exposure derives from the follow-up CTAs and efforts to minimize their use as well as the intraoperative radiation are greatly needed. The simulation-based estimations done in this study reinforce potential deleterious effects of the radiation exposure for patients undergoing EVAR of AAA. Efforts should be done to minimize the intraoperative radiation and the number of CTAs used during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharti Singh
- Vascular Center Malmö-Lund, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Martin Andersson
- Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics Malmö, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Andreas Edsfeldt
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Skåne, Lund/Malmö, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Björn Sonesson
- Vascular Center Malmö-Lund, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Mikael Gunnarsson
- Medical Radiation Physics Malmö, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nuno V Dias
- Vascular Center Malmö-Lund, Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Özdemir-van Brunschot D, Zerellari R, Tevs M, Holzhey D, Botsios S. Factors Influencing Compliance to Follow-Up After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2023; 57:878-883. [PMID: 37306151 DOI: 10.1177/15385744231183790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Regular follow-up after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm is necessary to detect endoleak and/or migration of the stentgraft. However, absence or incomplete compliance to follow-up is common in this patient population. In this study we will analyse the frequency of non-compliance to post-EVAR follow-up and explore the underlying reasons. METHODS All patients undergoing EVAR for infrarenal aortic aneurysm between 1st January 2011 and 31st December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Absence of compliance to FU was defined as not showing up at the out-patient clinic; incomplete FU was defined as a surveillance gap of >18 months. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Non-compliance to follow-up was 35.9% (175 patients). In the multivariate analysis the patients who came with a ruptured aneurysm and patients who needed secondary therapy in the first 30 days more often did not comply with the FU protocol (P = .03 and P < .01). Other studies have confirmed the low attendance to follow-up after EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Özdemir-van Brunschot
- Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Augusta Hospitaland Catholic Hospital Group Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Romina Zerellari
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Augusta Hospitaland Catholic Hospital Group Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Maria Tevs
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Augusta Hospitaland Catholic Hospital Group Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - David Holzhey
- Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Spiridon Botsios
- Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Augusta Hospitaland Catholic Hospital Group Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Otoya D, Lele S, Boyd S, Lavingia K, Amendola MF. Diagnosis of mental illness does not affect postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the VA healthcare system. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:1221-1227. [PMID: 37399970 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mental illness can be a debilitating chronic disease associated with a higher likelihood of preexisting medical comorbidities and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Given the relative prevalence of mental health disorders among the veteran population, we sought to examine postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS Retrospective review of a single institution Veterans Administration Hospital operative database was used to identify patients who underwent EVAR from January 2010 to December 2021. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, medications, and intraoperative variables were collected. In addition, mental illness status was evaluated to stratify patients based on preexisting anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, substance abuse disorder, or major psychiatric illness. The study's primary outcomes were postoperative complications, mortality, and follow-up rates. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, readmission rates, and intervention rates. RESULTS A total of 241 patients underwent infrarenal EVARs at our institution. One hundred forty patients (58.1%) were diagnosed with mental illness, whereas 101 (41.9%) had no prior diagnosis of mental illness. Of the 241 patients, 65.7% had a history of substance abuse disorder, 38.6% depression, 29.3% post-traumatic stress disorder, 19.3% anxiety, and 3.6% major psychiatric illness. There was no statistical difference in the number of medical comorbidities, race, smoking status, or medications compared with patients without mental illness. We found no statistical difference in access type, wound infection rates, hypogastric coiling, estimated blood loss, and operating time. χ2 analysis demonstrated a statistically significant lower overall postoperative complication rate (28.6% vs 32.7%; P = .05) and decreased loss to follow-up (8.6% vs 15.8%; P = .05) among patients with a preexisting mental illness diagnosis. There were no statistically significant differences in readmission rate, length of stay, or 30-day mortality. When stratified by type of mental illness, binary logistic regression demonstrated no statistically significant differences in primary outcomes of postoperative complications, readmission rates, loss to follow-up, and 1-year mortality. Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated no significant difference in cumulative survival in patients diagnosed with a mental illness (0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.107; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS There was no association between the presence of a prior mental health diagnosis and adverse outcomes following EVAR. Preceding mental illness did not correlate with an increased rate of complications, readmission, length of stay, or 30-day mortality in a veteran population. Lower loss to follow-up rates in patients with mental illness may reflect overall Veterans Health Administration expansion in resources and surveillance of these at-risk individuals. Further research is needed to assess the association between postoperative outcomes and mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Otoya
- Central Virginia Veterans Administration Health System, Richmond, VA
| | - Sonia Lele
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
| | - Sally Boyd
- Central Virginia Veterans Administration Health System, Richmond, VA
| | - Kedar Lavingia
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; Central Virginia Veterans Administration Health System, Richmond, VA.
| | - Michael F Amendola
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; Central Virginia Veterans Administration Health System, Richmond, VA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peres P, Lupson M, Dawson J. The benefits of a centralized remote surveillance program for vascular patients. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:913-921. [PMID: 36356674 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the clinical and financial utility of a centralized remote surveillance program for vascular patients compared with traditional outpatient follow-up. METHODS In 2014, the Royal Adelaide Hospital Department of Vascular Surgery introduced a centralized remote surveillance program where suitable patients were monitored by remote imaging in lieu of traditional outpatient appointments (OPAs). Surveillance imaging was performed at a site local to the patient and was reviewed centrally by a dedicated surveillance nurse. We undertook a 5-year retrospective analysis of the program's prospectively maintained database since its inception. Costs for inpatient admissions and OPAs were retrieved from hospital financial databases. The surveillance database and electronic patient records were analyzed for number and outcome of surveillance scans, interventions, and OPAs. Additional savings in travel distance, fuel costs, and CO2 emissions were also calculated. RESULTS Over 5 years, 1262 patients underwent a mean of four scans per patient. A total of 3718 OPAs were saved, approximating 930 hours of clinic and consultant time, with associated savings of Australian (A)$1,524,900 (United States [US]$ 1,065,684) over 5 years (A$ 304,980 [US$ 213,137] per year). For every OPA avoided, each patient saved 197 km travel and A$87 (US$ 61) fuel costs, with an associated 115 kg of CO2 emissions saved. Over 5 years, this equated to savings of 248,173 km travel, A$ 110,136 (US$ 76,969) fuel costs, and 146 tons of CO2 emissions. A total of 134 surveillance-detected pathologies (10.6%) required intervention, a further 28 despite surveillance (2.2%), and three following surveillance cessation (0.2%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that interventions despite surveillance were three times more expensive and incurred four times longer admissions than those due to surveillance. CONCLUSIONS Remote vascular surveillance, particularly applicable in our current COVID-19 pandemic climate, is associated with quantifiable financial, clinical, patient, and environmental beneficial outcomes and can be safely delivered to populations spanning large geographical areas such as those in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Peres
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Marianne Lupson
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Joseph Dawson
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Antoniou GA, Kontopodis N, Rogers SK, Golledge J, Forbes TL, Torella F, Verhagen HJM, Schermerhorn ML. Editor's Choice - Meta-Analysis of Compliance with Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Surveillance: The EVAR Surveillance Paradox. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:244-254. [PMID: 36273676 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the survival of patients who attended surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with those who were non-compliant. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and Embase were searched using the Ovid interface. REVIEW METHODS A systematic review was conducted complying with the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies compared survival in EVAR surveillance compliant patients with non-compliant patients. Non-compliance was defined as failure to attend at least one post-EVAR follow up. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework. Primary outcomes were survival and aneurysm related death. Effect measures were the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated using the inverse variance or Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and random effects models. RESULTS Thirteen cohort studies with a total of 22 762 patients were included. Eight studies were deemed high risk of bias. The pooled proportion of patients who were non-compliant with EVAR surveillance was 43% (95% CI 36 - 51). No statistically significant difference was found in the hazard of all cause mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.61 - 1.77), aneurysm related mortality (HR 1.80, 95% CI 0.85-3.80), or secondary intervention (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.31 - 1.41) between patients who had incomplete and complete follow up after EVAR. The odds of aneurysm rupture were lower in non-compliant patients (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39 - 1.01). The certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. Subgroup analysis for patients who had no surveillance vs. those with complete surveillance showed no significant difference in all cause mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.43 - 2.80). CONCLUSION Patients who were non-compliant with EVAR surveillance had similar survival to those who were compliant. These findings question the value of intense surveillance in all patients post-EVAR and highlight the need for further research on individualised or risk adjusted surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George A Antoniou
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Nikolaos Kontopodis
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University General Hospital of Heraklion, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Steven K Rogers
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jonathan Golledge
- Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Australia; Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Thomas L Forbes
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francesco Torella
- Liverpool Vascular & Endovascular Service, Liverpool, UK; School of Physical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hence J M Verhagen
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Salvi C, Besancenot A, Sebahi S, Rinckenbach S, Salomon Du Mont L. Influence of Home Location on Follow-Up Compliance after Endovascular Treatment for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 2023:S0890-5096(23)00001-8. [PMID: 36641089 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complications of EVAR require compliance to a close follow-up imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine whether home location predicted a poor compliance to imaging follow-up after EVAR. METHODS We analyzed a cohort of patients treated by EVAR at the Besançon University Hospital between 2007 and 2017. Follow-up imaging followed the French High Health Authority recommendations. Noncompliance with follow-up compliance was defined as a first missed postoperative appointment or 2 consecutive missed appointments after the first control CT-scan, and 2 groups of patients were identified: compliant (group C) or noncompliant (group NC). Univariate and multivariate analyzes were used to investigate compliance risk factors. Collected complications included endoleaks, limb thrombosis, infections, and secondary ruptures. RESULTS Two hundred and fifty-eight of the 359 patients treated during this period were enrolled, including 233 men (90.3%), with a mean age of 74.0 years (±9.0) and a mean follow-up of 5.0 years (±2.6). The compliance rate was 38.8% and the 1-year mortality rate was 12.0%. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, a place of residence greater located over 60 min away from the hospital had a poor effect on compliance (Odd ratio [OR] = 0.58; P = 0.047). Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAD) and an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter greater than 5.0 cm were protective factors (OR = 2.23; P = 0.006 and OR = 1.85, respectively; P = 0.002). Four-year all-cause mortality was 21.0% in group C and 17.0% in the NC group (P = 0.54). Complications were more significant in group C (59.0%) compared to group NC (39.0%) (P = 0.001). Two ruptures occurred in the NC group (1.3%), versus none in the C group (P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS In this study, a long distance from the home to the hospital was a detrimental factor for follow up compliance. However, a good compliance did not decrease the 4-year mortality rate. The high rate of noncompliance found should lead to a more personalized follow-up strategy taking into account the anatomical elements but also the comorbidities and some social aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlène Salvi
- University Hospital, Vascular Surgery Unit, Besançon, France.
| | | | - Soumia Sebahi
- University Hospital, Vascular Surgery Unit, Besançon, France
| | - Simon Rinckenbach
- University Hospital, Vascular Surgery Unit, Besançon, France; University of Franche Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Lucie Salomon Du Mont
- University Hospital, Vascular Surgery Unit, Besançon, France; University of Franche Comté, Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ul-Mulk Z, Antoniou GA. Prognostic prediction models for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061420. [PMID: 36307155 PMCID: PMC9621180 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has a marked short-term advantage over open surgical repair in managing abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA); however, this benefit is lost in the long term. The current trend towards stratified medicine has given rise to diverse prognostic prediction models and scoring systems for EVAR. These models could act as decision support tools that employ patient and operative factors, to improve long-term outcomes. Past literature evaluated and compared model performance for predicting one outcome, for example, mortality. None were deemed competent for clinical application. The proposed study will use a scoping review approach to capture literature on prognostic modelling in EVAR for all predictable outcomes. The results are anticipated to inform future research, identify knowledge gaps, and assist in determining the potential of models for clinical use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The proposed study will use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping Reviews as a framework for conducting the review. PubMed Central, Embase and Cochrane Library will be searched and screened for peer-reviewed studies on prognostic modelling for EVAR, published between 2000 and 2022. No limits exist on predictor variables used and outcomes predicted by the model for inclusion, provided they apply to AAA patients managed with EVAR. Data will be abstracted using a charting form based on the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies guidelines and PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. The Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis checklist will be used to critically appraise included studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Since scoping reviews cover secondary data from published literature, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at key conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoheb Ul-Mulk
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - George A Antoniou
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester School of Medical Sciences, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alberga AJ, Stangenberger VA, de Bruin JL, Wever JJ, Wilschut JA, van den Brand CL, Verhagen HJM, W J M Wouters M. Administrative healthcare data as an addition to the Dutch surgaical aneurysm audit to evaluate mid-term reinterventions following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A pilot study. Int J Med Inform 2022; 164:104806. [PMID: 35671586 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) is a nationwide mandatory quality registry that evaluates the perioperative outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The DSAA includes perioperative outcomes that occur up to 30 days, but various complications following AAA repair occur after this period. Administrative healthcare data yield the possibility to evaluate later occuring outcomes such as reinterventions, without increasing the registration burden. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and the potential benefit of administrative healthcare data to evaluate mid-term reinterventions following intact AAA repair. METHOD All patients that underwent primary endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR) for an intact infrarenal AAA between January 2017 and December 2018 were selected from the DSAA. Subsequently, these patients were identified in a database containing reimbursement data. Healthcare activity codes that refer to reinterventions following AAA repair were examined to assess reinterventions within 12 and 15 months following EVAR and OSR. RESULTS We selected 4043 patients from the DSAA, and 2059 (51%) patients could be identified in the administrative healthcare database. Reintervention rates of 10.4% following EVAR and 9.5% following OSR within 12 months (p = 0.719), and 11.5% following EVAR and 10.8% following OSR within 15 months (p = 0.785) were reported. CONCLUSION Administrative healthcare data as an addition to the DSAA is potentially beneficial to evaluate mid-term reinterventions following intact AAA repair without increasing the registration burden for clinicians. Further validation is necessary before reliable implementation of this tool is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna J Alberga
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Jorg L de Bruin
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J Wever
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke A Wilschut
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hence J M Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Phillips AR, Andraska EA, Reitz KM, Gabriel L, Salem KM, Sridharan ND, Tzeng E, Liang NL. Any Postoperative Surveillance Improves Survival after Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 80:50-59. [PMID: 34775012 PMCID: PMC8897248 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has advanced the care of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) with improved early postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, this comes at the cost of a rigorous postoperative surveillance schedule to monitor for further aneurysmal degeneration. Adherence to surveillance recommendations is known to be poor in the elective setting, but has yet to be studied in the ruptured population. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of incomplete surveillance after EVAR for rAAA (rEVAR) and examine how adherence impacts outcomes. METHODS This was a retrospective case control study of patients undergoing rEVAR at a multiple hospital single healthcare center (2003-2020). Patients were excluded if they underwent open conversion during their index hospitalization or died within 60 days of surgery. Follow-up was broadly categorized as complete surveillance (60-day postoperative visit and annually thereafter) or incomplete surveillance, comprising both patients with less than recommended surveillance (minimal surveillance) and completely lost to follow-up (LTF). Any follow-up was defined as patients with complete or minimal surveillance. We investigated predictors of complete versus incomplete surveillance by multivariate logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and cumulative incidence of reintervention controlling for the competing risk of mortality, generating hazard ratios (HR) and subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR). RESULTS One-hundred and sixty patients (mean age 74 ± 10.1 years, 81.2% male) out of 673 total rAAA met study inclusion criteria. Complete surveillance was seen in 41.3% of our cohort, with the remainder with minimal surveillance (29.4%) or LTF (29.4%). Incomplete surveillance was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.56; 95% CI 1.02-6.43), lack of a primary care provider (PCP; OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-0.99), and longer driving distance from home to treating hospital (OR 2.37; 95% CI 1.08-5.20). Survival was not different between complete and incomplete surveillance groups, however any follow-up conferred improved survival over LTF (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.331-0.997; P = 0.049). Reintervention was associated with incomplete surveillance (SHR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11-0.75), and discharge to a facility (SHR 0.25; 95% CI 0.067-0.94). CONCLUSIONS Incomplete surveillance was observed in over 50% of patients who underwent rEVAR and was associated with male sex, lack of PCP, and longer driving distance. Any follow-up conferred a survival benefit, yet incomplete surveillance was associated with a lower risk of reintervention. Targeted strategies to prevent LTF, and less stringent, personalized follow-up plans that may confer similar survival benefit with better patient adherence should be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda R. Phillips
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UPMC. 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Elizabeth A. Andraska
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UPMC. 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Katherine M. Reitz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UPMC. 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Lucine Gabriel
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. 3550 Terrace Street, Pitsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Karim M. Salem
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UPMC. 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. 3550 Terrace Street, Pitsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Natalie D. Sridharan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UPMC. 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. 3550 Terrace Street, Pitsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Edith Tzeng
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UPMC. 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. 3550 Terrace Street, Pitsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Nathan L. Liang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UPMC. 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. 3550 Terrace Street, Pitsburgh, PA 15213
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bastos Gonçalves F, Vermassen F. No Survival Benefit for Patients Compliant with EVAR Follow Up: Bias or The End of Follow up as We Know It? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 63:400. [PMID: 35027272 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frederico Bastos Gonçalves
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kessler V, Klopf J, Eilenberg W, Neumayer C, Brostjan C. AAA Revisited: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors, Management, and Hallmarks of Pathogenesis. Biomedicines 2022; 10:94. [PMID: 35052774 PMCID: PMC8773452 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite declining incidence and mortality rates in many countries, the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) continues to represent a life-threatening cardiovascular condition with an overall prevalence of about 2-3% in the industrialized world. While the risk of AAA development is considerably higher for men of advanced age with a history of smoking, screening programs serve to detect the often asymptomatic condition and prevent aortic rupture with an associated death rate of up to 80%. This review summarizes the current knowledge on identified risk factors, the multifactorial process of pathogenesis, as well as the latest advances in medical treatment and surgical repair to provide a perspective for AAA management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Christine Brostjan
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (V.K.); (J.K.); (W.E.); (C.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Midterm outcomes of 455 patients receiving the AFX2 endovascular graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: A retrospective multi-center analysis. PLoS One 2022; 16:e0261623. [PMID: 34972133 PMCID: PMC8719761 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Since being introduced into clinical practice the AFX family of endografts has undergone labelling updates, design and manufacturing changes to address a Type III failure mode. The published literature on the performance of the current endograft-AFX2 -is limited to small series with limited follow up. The present study reports the largest series of patients implanted with AFX2 for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The study was a retrospective, 5 center study of patients receiving an AFX2 endograft from January 2016 until Dec 2020. Electronic case report forms were provided to four of the centers, with one additional site providing relevant outcomes in an independent dataset. Relevant outcomes were reported via Kaplan-Meier analysis and included all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related mortality, post EVAR aortic rupture, open conversion, device related reinterventions and endoleaks. Among a cohort of 460 patients, 405 underwent elective repair of an AAA, 50 were treated for a ruptured AAA, and 5 were aorto-iliac occlusive disease cases. For the elective cohort (mean age 73.7y, 77% male, mean AAA diameter 5.4cm), the peri-operative mortality was 1.7%. Freedom from aneurysm-related mortality was 98.2% at 1,2,3 and 4 years post-operatively, there were no post-operative aortic ruptures, and 2 patients required open conversion. Freedom from Type Ia endoleaks was 99.4% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years. Freedom from Type IIIa and Type IIIb endoleaks were 100% and 100% (year 1), 100% and 99.6% (year 2), 99.4% and 99.6% (year 3), 99.4% and 99.6% (year 4) respectively. Freedom from all device-related reintervention (including Type II endoleaks) at 4 y was 86.8%. The AFX2 endograft appears to perform to a satisfactory standard in terms of patient centric outcomes in mid-term follow up. The Type Ia and Type III endoleaks rates at 4y appear to be within acceptable limits. Further follow up studies are warranted.
Collapse
|
26
|
Kirkham EN, Nicholls J, Wilson WRW, Cooper DG, Paravastu SCV, Kulkarni SR. Safety and Validity of the Proposed European Society for Vascular Surgery Infrarenal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Surveillance Protocol: A Single Centre Evaluation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 62:879-885. [PMID: 34764002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Long term surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is essential to detect late complications, but there is variation in practice. The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) made a recommendation for a new surveillance protocol; one element involves risk stratifying patients depending on sac size reduction and presence of endoleak at their 30 day computed tomography angiogram into low risk groups (delayed imaging to five years) or higher risk groups (continue with the current protocol). The aim was to test this suggested protocol retrospectively within an EVAR patient cohort. METHODS Data on EVARs performed from October 2009 to October 2019 were collected. Information gathered from an existing surveillance programme was used to assess the proposed ESVS protocol. All patients who underwent re-intervention were reviewed to see whether adopting the proposed ESVS protocol would have detected these events. RESULTS In total, 309 procedures were included. Altogether, 219 of these patients had no endoleak (70.9%) and 86 had a type II (27.8%) endoleak. Only four developed a type I or III endoleak. No patient in the low risk cohort (no initial endoleak or sac shrinkage > 1 cm) required secondary intervention. Five year follow up data were available for 103 patients. In the type II endoleak group, there were 28 secondary interventions in 22 patients. No patient experienced a ruptured aneurysm within five years post-operatively. Had the proposed ESVS protocol been followed, all patients requiring a secondary intervention or with increasing sac size would have been detected/captured. Further, adherence to the ESVS guidelines would have resulted in 103 patients with a five year follow up history qualifying for reduced surveillance. A further 120 patients who had reached the three and four year follow up timepoints could have qualified for a reduced surveillance, reducing imaging cost further. CONCLUSION Adopting the proposed ESVS EVAR surveillance protocol safely identified "low risk" patients who did not go on to require a secondary intervention. These patients could benefit from reduced surveillance scanning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily N Kirkham
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Jonathan Nicholls
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - W Richard W Wilson
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - David G Cooper
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Sharath C V Paravastu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Sachin R Kulkarni
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mylonas S, Behrens A, Dorweiler B. [Pro Endo: No Need for Open Any More... Surveillance is All Important]. Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146:464-469. [PMID: 34666361 DOI: 10.1055/a-1618-6913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Since its first report in 1991, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become an established and preferred treatment modality for many patients. Several randomised controlled trials comparing EVAR and open repair have shown an early survival benefit, lower perioperative morbidity and shorter hospital stay with EVAR. As a result, EVAR has become the most common method of elective repair of BAAs in most vascular centres. Despite its widespread use, there are still subgroups of the patient population for whom the benefit of EVAR has not been clearly demonstrated. The most frequently discussed subgroup in this context is the patient with few risk factors - due to concerns about the durability and need of reinterventions. EVAR can provide durability and long-term survival similar to open repair in these younger patients, as long as the aneurysm anatomy and instructions for use are followed. The evidence on the effects of follow-up on patient survival is currently controversial. With increasing knowledge about the behavior of endoprostheses and factors that influence the complications of the endograft, changes in follow-up protocols have been made. A more patient-specific follow-up strategy and less compliance with a rigorous follow up scheme are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon Mylonas
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Amelie Behrens
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Bernhard Dorweiler
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Is Compliance With Guideline Recommended Follow-Up After Aortic Dissection Associated With Survival? Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 113:846-852. [PMID: 33878311 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with acute aortic dissection (AD) remain at risk for long-term complications and thus are recommended to adhere closely to American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association aorta guideline-based follow-up imaging and clinic visits. The long-term outcomes of compliance with such a model are not well understood. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients at a regional AD center who survived hospital discharge for AD and who were analyzed by compliance with initial follow-up at 3 months and long term after AD. The primary end point was death. RESULTS A total of 172 (66% type A; 33% type B) patients survived hospitalization and were followed up over 48 months (interquartile range [IQR], 21, 88 months). Of these patients, 122 (71%) attended the first follow-up appointment, and 90 (52%) attended more than two-thirds of recommended appointments. Patients who attended the first follow-up visit had improved long-term follow-up compliance (75% [IQR, 50%, 91%]) compared with patients who did not attend the first visit (18% [IQR, 0%, 57%]). Noncompliance with the scheduled long-term follow-up was associated with a 50% increase in the risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2, 2.1; P < .001). Furthermore, in patients with low compliance (consistently attending less than one-third of follow-up appointments), the lifetime risk of death after AD was more than double that of patients with high compliance (consistently attending more than two-thirds of appointments) (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5, 3.1; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Nearly one-third of patients with AD do not attend the first recommended follow-up visit, and such failure was associated with later noncompliance with subsequent follow-up. Low-compliant patients have double the lifetime risk of death after AD than do high-compliant patients.
Collapse
|
29
|
Iscan HZ, Unal EU, Akkaya B, Daglı M, Karahan M, Civelek I, Ozbek MH, Okten RS. Color Doppler ultrasound for surveillance following EVAR as the primary tool. J Card Surg 2020; 36:111-117. [PMID: 33225510 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As aneurysm-related events and rupture is not eliminated, postoperative lifelong surveillance is mandatory after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). For surveillance colored Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) is a standard method of noninvasive evaluation having the advantages of availability, cost-effectiveness, and lack of nephrotoxicity and radiation. We evaluated CDUS for primary surveillance tool after elective EVAR by comparing with computerized tomography. METHODS Between January 2018 and March 2020, 84 consecutive post-EVAR patients were evaluated. First, CDUS was performed by two Doppler operators from the Radiology Department and then computed tomographic angiography (CTA) was performed. The operators were blind to CTA reports. A reporting protocol was organized for endoleak detection and largest aneurysm diameter. RESULTS Among 84 patients, there were 11 detected endoleaks (13.1%) with CTA and seven of them was detected with CDUS (r = .884, p < .001). All Type I and III endoleaks were detected perfectly. There is an insufficiency in detecting low flow by CDUS. Eliminating this frailty, there was a strong correlation of aneurysm sac diameter measurement between CTA and CDUS (r = .777, p < .001). The sensitivity and specificity of CDUS was 63.6% and 100%, respectively. The accuracy was 95.2%. Positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 94.8%. Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression analysis showed no proportional bias (mean difference of 1.5 ± 2.2 mm, p = .233). CONCLUSIONS For surveillance, CDUS promises accurate results without missing any potential complication requiring intervention as Type I or III endoleak. Lack of detecting Type II endoleaks may be negligible as sac enlargement was the key for reintervention in this situation and CDUS has a remarkably high correlation with CTA in sac diameter measurement. CDUS may be a primary surveillance tool for EVAR and CTA will be reserved in case of aneurysm sac enlargement, detection of an endoleak, inadequate CDUS, or in case of unexplained abdominal symptomatology. By this way we not only avoid ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic agents, but also achieve cost saving issue also.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakkı Z Iscan
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ertekin U Unal
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Boğaçhan Akkaya
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Daglı
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Karahan
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Isa Civelek
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet H Ozbek
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Cardiovascular Hospital, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Rıza S Okten
- Department of Radiology, Ankara City Hospital Complex, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schmitz-Rixen T, Böckler D, J. Vogl T, T. Grundmann R. Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2020; 117:813-819. [PMID: 33568258 PMCID: PMC8005839 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review presents the surgical indications, surgical procedures, and results in the treatment of asymptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS An updated search of the literature on screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of AAA, based on the German clinical practice guideline published in 2018. RESULTS Surgery is indicated in men with an asymptomatic AAA ≥ 5.5 cm and in women, ≥ 5.0 cm. The indication in men is based on four randomized trials, while in women the data are not conclusive. The majority of patients with AAA (around 80%) meanwhile receive endovascular treatment (endovascular aortic repair, EVAR). Open surgery (open aneurysm repair, OAR) is reserved for patients with longer life expectancy and lower morbidity. The pooled 30-day mortality is 1.16% (95% confidence interval [0.92; 1.39]) following EVAR, 3.27% [2.7; 3.83] after OAR. Women have higher operative/interventional mortality than men (odds ratio 1.67%). The mortality for ruptured AAA is extremely high: around 80% of women and 70% of men die after AAA rupture. Ruptured AAA should, if possible, be treated via the endovascular approach, ideally with the patient under local anesthesia. Treatment at specialized centers guarantees the required expertise and infrastructure. Long-term periodic monitoring by mean of imaging (duplex sonography, plus computed tomography if needed) is essential, particularly following EVAR, to detect and (if appropriate) treat endoleaks, to document stable diameter of the eliminated aneurysmal sac, and to determine whether reintervention is necessary (long-term reintervention rate circa 18%). CONCLUSION Vascular surgery now offers a high degree of safety in the treatment of patients with asymptomatic AAA. Endovascular intervention is preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Schmitz-Rixen
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and the University Wound Center, Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Dittmar Böckler
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas J. Vogl
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and the University Wound Center, Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Reinhart T. Grundmann
- German Institute for Vascular Health Research (DIGG) of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wong DJ, Chaikof EL. The ESSEA Trial: A Clear Image of a Fuzzy Problem. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13:e010990. [PMID: 32507021 DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.120.010990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Elliot L Chaikof
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chastant R, Canaud L, Ozdemir BA, Aubas P, Molinari N, Picard E, Branchereau P, Marty-Ané CH, Alric P. Elective late open conversion after endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with comparable outcomes to primary open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:502-509.e1. [PMID: 32473342 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Three of four patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm are now treated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The incidence of secondary procedures and surgical conversions is increasing for a population theoretically unfit for open surgery. The indications and outcomes of late open surgical conversions after EVAR in a high-volume tertiary vascular unit are reported. METHODS This retrospective single-center study includes all patients who underwent a late open conversion between January 1996 and July 2018. Data were collected from records on patient demographics, operative indications, surgical strategy, perioperative outcomes, and medium-term survival. RESULTS Sixty-two consecutive patients (88.7% male) with a mean age of 77.5 years are included. The median duration since index EVAR was 38.5 months; 65% of stent grafts requiring late open conversion had suprarenal fixation. Indications included 22.6% type IA, 16.1% type IB, and 45.2% type II endoleaks; 12.9% graft thrombosis; and 14.5% endoprosthesis infection. Complete endograft explantation was performed in 37.1% of patients and a partial explantation in 54.8%, whereas 8.1% of stent grafts were wholly preserved in situ. Overall 30-day mortality was 12.9% (n = 8) in the cohort and 2.7% for elective patients. The all-cause morbidity rate was 40.1%, and the median length of hospital stay was 9 days. After follow-up of 28.4 months (range, 1.8-187.3 months), all-cause survival was 58.8%. Avoidance of aortic clamping (P = .006) and elective procedures (P = .019) were associated with a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay. Moreover, the 30-day mortality (P = .002), occurrence of postoperative renal dysfunction (P = .004), and intestinal ischemia (P = .017) were increased in the emergency setting. Excluding cases with rupture or infection, survival estimates were 97%, 97%, and 71% at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Technically more complex than primary open surgery, late open conversion is a procedure that generates an acceptable perioperative risk when it is performed in a high-volume aortic surgical center. Elective open conversion is associated with excellent early and late outcomes. Endograft preservation strategies decrease perioperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Chastant
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France.
| | - Ludovic Canaud
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Baris Ata Ozdemir
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France; Vascular and Endovascular Department, North Bristol NHS Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Pierre Aubas
- Department of Medical Information, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Nicolas Molinari
- Department of Medical Information, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Eric Picard
- Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Caremeau Hospital, Nimes, France
| | - Pascal Branchereau
- Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Caremeau Hospital, Nimes, France
| | - Charles-Henri Marty-Ané
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Alric
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Galanakis N, Kontopodis N, Tavlas E, Tsetis D, Ioannou CV. Does a previous aortic endograft confer any protective effect during abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture? Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Vascular 2020; 28:241-250. [PMID: 31937207 DOI: 10.1177/1708538119896464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Whether prior endovascular aneurysm repair confers a protective effect in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is not known. We aimed to systematically review and compare the outcomes of rAAA in patients with and without prior endovascular aneurysm repair. METHODS We performed a systematic review that conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. We selected studies comparing the outcomes in patients with rAAA after prior endovascular aneurysm repair (group 1) and those with de novo rAAAs (group 2). We conducted a proportion meta-analysis of perioperative mortality and obtained summary estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. RESULTS We included four studies (retrospective observational studies) in quantitative synthesis reporting a total of 719 patients (group 1 (89) group 2 (630)). The perioperative mortality in groups 1 and 2 was 30.4% and 41%, respectively, and there was no statistical significant difference between the groups (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30-1.43, P = 0.29, I2=58%). However, patients presenting with rAAA following previous endovascular aneurysm repair were more hemodynamically stable (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.90, P = 0.03, I2=74%). The choice between endovascular or open surgery treatment in group 1 did not affect the perioperative mortality (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.41-3.04 P = 0.82, I2=0%). Endoleak types I and III were the main causes of rAAA in group 1. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative mortality was similar for rAAA either de novo or after prior endovascular aneurysm repair. However, ruptures in patients with prior endovascular aneurysm repair presented hemodynamically more stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Galanakis
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kontopodis
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Tavlas
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tsetis
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Christos V Ioannou
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bewley BR, Servais AB, Salehi P. The evolution of stent grafts for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: how design changes affect clinical outcomes. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:965-980. [DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1684897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Payam Salehi
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Boufi M, Ozdemir BA. Commentary: Surveillance After EVAR: Still Room for Debate. J Endovasc Ther 2019; 26:542-543. [PMID: 31303132 DOI: 10.1177/1526602819858622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mourad Boufi
- 1 Department of Vascular Surgery, APHM, University Hospital Nord, Marseille, France.,2 Aix-Marseille Université, IFSTTAR, UMR T24, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
de Mik SML, Geraedts ACM, Ubbink DT, Balm R. Effect of Imaging Surveillance After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair on Reinterventions and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2019; 26:531-541. [PMID: 31140361 PMCID: PMC6630065 DOI: 10.1177/1526602819852085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To study the effects of imaging surveillance after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) on reintervention and mortality. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted comparing complication rates in EVAR patients compliant with the imaging surveillance protocol vs partially or noncompliant patients. Two authors independently selected articles and performed quality assessment and data extraction. Risk differences for reintervention and mortality between compliant and partially/noncompliant patients were meta-analyzed. The pooled risk difference (RD) is reported with the 95% confidence interval (CI). The review protocol is registered at Prospero (CRD42017080494). Results: A total of 11 cohort studies involving 21,838 patients were included. Studies differed in imaging, their surveillance protocols, and definitions of compliance subgroups. Median follow-up was 31.7 months (interquartile range 29.8, 49.3). The overall reintervention rate was 5%, while the overall mortality was 31%. The RD for the reintervention rate was 4% (95% CI 1% to 7%) in favor of partial/noncompliance [number needed to harm 25 (95% CI 14 to 100)], while mortality showed a nonsignificant RD of 12% (95% CI −2% to 26%) in favor of partial/noncompliance. Two studies reported that 41% to 53% of reinterventions were performed for complications detected through imaging surveillance; the other events were detected through patient symptoms. Conclusion: Patients who are compliant with imaging surveillance appear to undergo more reinterventions than those who are partially or noncompliant. However, imaging surveillance does not seem to protect against mortality. This suggests that the recommended yearly imaging surveillance may not be beneficial for all EVAR patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvana M L de Mik
- 1 Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anna C M Geraedts
- 1 Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk T Ubbink
- 1 Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron Balm
- 1 Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Grima MJ, Karthikesalingam A, Holt PJ, Kerr D, Chetter I, Harrison S, Sayers R, Roy I, Vallabhaneni SR, Dominic P, Bachoo P, Griffin J, Lewis D, Hardman J, Rihan A, Brooks M, Woodburn K, Godfrey D, Nordon I, Vidal-Diez A, Stenson K, Bahia S, Patterson B, Oladokun D, De Bruin J, Loftus I, Thompson MM, Lowe C, Ashrafi M, Ghosh J, Ashleigh R. Multicentre Post-EVAR Surveillance Evaluation Study (EVAR-SCREEN). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 57:521-526. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
38
|
Chisci E, Guidotti A, Pigozzi C, Frosini P, Sapio PL, Troisi N, Ercolini L, Michelagnoli S. Long-term analysis of standard abdominal aortic endovascular repair using different grafts focusing on endoleak onset and its evolution. Int J Cardiol 2019; 276:53-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
39
|
Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, Dick F, van Herwaarden J, Karkos C, Koelemay M, Kölbel T, Loftus I, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell J, Szeberin Z, ESVS Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Chakfe N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Kakkos S, Koncar I, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, de Vega M, Vermassen F, Document reviewers, Björck M, Cheng S, Dalman R, Davidovic L, Donas K, Earnshaw J, Eckstein HH, Golledge J, Haulon S, Mastracci T, Naylor R, Ricco JB, Verhagen H. Editor's Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 57:8-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 873] [Impact Index Per Article: 145.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
40
|
Ultee KH, Verhagen HJ. Commentary on “The Implications of Non-compliance for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)”. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 55:503. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|