Editor's Choice - Assessment of Correlation Between Mean Size of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm at Time of Intact Repair Against Repair and Rupture Rate in Nine Countries

Disparities in mortality rates from aortic aneurysm and dissection by country-level income status and sex

Objective

To investigate the impact of national income level and sex on mortality trends from aortic aneurysm and dissection in addition to all aortic disease as a whole.

Methods

Using data from the World Health Organization mortality database, we conducted an analysis of mortality trends from aortic disease between 2000 and 2019, Countries were categorized into middle-income and high-income countries (MICs and HICs) on the basis of income level. Age-standardized and sex-specific age-standardized mortality rates per 100,000 persons, along with male-to-female mortality ratios, were calculated. Trends over the study period were analyzed using joinpoint regression.

Results

Our analysis comprised 29 MICs and 46 HICs, with an average population of 595 million and 1042 million during the observation period. During the observation period, age-standardized mortality rates from aortic disease decreased to 2.21 (2.17-2.25) and 2.28 (2.26-2.30) in MICs and HICs, respectively (average annual percentage change of -0.5% in MICs and -1.8% in HICs, P < .05 for both). However, mortality rates from aortic dissection increased in HICs from 2000 to 2019 (average annual percentage change of 1.3%, P < .001). Mortality from aortic disease, aortic dissection, and aortic aneurysm were male dominant in MICs and HICs but decreasing trends during the observation periods except for aortic dissection in MICs.

Conclusions

We present the contemporary and comprehensive analysis of global socioeconomic status and aortic diseases mortality. Although trends of mortality from aortic diseases are on the decline in both MICs and HICs, there is a striking increase in mortality for aortic dissection, specifically in HICs.

Editor's Choice - Outcomes Following Intact and Ruptured Aneurysm Repair across Nations: Analysis of International Registry Data from the VASCUNET Collaboration 2014 - 2019

OBJECTIVE

To determine the peri-operative mortality rate for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in 10 countries and to compare practice and outcomes over a six year period by age, sex, and geographic location.

METHODS

This VASCUNET study used prospectively collected data from vascular registries in 10 countries on primary repair of intact and ruptured AAAs undertaken between January 2014 and December 2019. The primary outcome was peri-operative death (30 day or in hospital). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between peri-operative death, patient characteristics, and type of procedure. Factors associated with the use of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The analysis included 50 642 intact and 9 453 ruptured AAA repairs. The proportion of EVARs for intact repairs increased from 63.4% in 2014 to 67.3% in 2016 before falling to 62.3% in 2019 (p < .001), but practice varied between countries. EVAR procedures were more common among older patients (p < .001) and men (p < .001). Overall peri-operative mortality after intact AAA repair was 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 - 1.5%) and did not change over time. Mortality rates were stable within countries. Among ruptured AAA repairs, the proportion of EVARs increased from 23.7% in 2014 to 35.2% in 2019 (p < .001). The average aortic diameter was 7.8 cm for men and 7.0 cm for women (p < .001). The overall peri-operative mortality rate was 31.3% (95% CI 30.4 - 32.2%); the rates were 36.0% (95% CI 34.9 - 37.2%) for open repair and 19.7% (95% CI 18.2 - 21.3%) for EVAR. This difference and shift to EVAR reduced peri-operative mortality from 32.6% (in 2014) to 28.7% (in 2019).

CONCLUSION

The international practice of intact AAA repair was associated with low mortality rates in registry reported data. There remains variation in the use of EVAR for intact AAAs across countries. Overall peri-operative mortality remains high after ruptured AAA, but an increased use of EVAR has reduced rates over time.

Preliminary establishment and validation of the inversion method for growth and remodeling parameters of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm

Traditional medical imaging and biomechanical studies have challenges in analyzing the long-term evolution process of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The homogenized constrained mixture theory (HCMT) allows for quantitative analysis of the changes in the multidimensional morphology and composition of AAA. However, the accuracy of HCMT still requires further clinical verification. This study aims to establish a patient-specific AAA growth model based on HCMT, simulate the long-term growth and remodeling (G&R) process of AAA, and validate the feasibility and accuracy of the method using two additional AAA cases with five follow-up datasets. The media and adventitia layers of AAA were modeled as mixtures composed of elastin, collagen fibers, and smooth muscle cells (SMCs). The strain energy function was used to describe the continuous deposition and degradation effect of the mixture during the AAA evolution. Multiple sets of growth parameters were applied to finite element simulations, and the simulation results were compared with the follow-up data for gradually selecting the optimal growth parameters. Two additional AAA patients with different growth rates were used for validating this method, the optimal growth parameters were obtained using the first two follow-up imaging data, and the growth model was applied to simulate the subsequent four time points. The differences between the simulated diameters and the follow-up diameters of AAA were compared to validate the accuracy of the mechanistic model. The growth parameters, especially the stress-mediated substance deposition gain factor, are highly related to the AAA G&R process. When setting the optimal growth parameters to simulate AAA growth, the proportion of simulation results within the distance of less than 0.5 mm from the baseline models is above 80%. For the validating cases, the mean difference rates between the simulated diameter and the real-world diameter are within 2.5%, which basically meets the clinical demand for quantitatively predicting the AAA growth in maximum diameters. This study simulated the growth process of AAA, and validated the accuracy of this mechanistic model. This method was proved to be used to predict the G&R process of AAA caused by dynamic changes in the mixtures of the AAA vessel wall during long-term, assisting accurately and quantitatively predicting the multidimensional morphological development and mixtures evolution process of AAA in the clinic.

[Vascular Registry is a tool for quality improvement in vascular medicine]

A 2002 óta működő Érsebészeti Regiszter kezdetben verőérműtétek adatainak gyűjtéséből és a beavatkozások eredményeinek elemzéséből állt. Nagy előrelépést jelentett 2006-ban az Európai Érsebész Társaság VASCUNET Munkacsoportjához történő csatlakozás, mely szervezet azóta globális nemzetközi tudományos együttműködéssé fejlődött. A hazai regiszter adatainak felhasználásával az elmúlt 15 évben számos nagy nemzetközi tanulmányt folytattunk le, és ezek alapján több mint 30 publikáció jelent meg, melyekben aktív szerepet vállaltak a Magyar Angiológiai és Érsebészeti Társaság Regiszter Bizottságának tagjai is. Az egyes országok vascularis ellátásának jellemzőit és eredményeit összehasonlító tanulmányok különösen hasznos következtetések levonását tették lehetővé, ami hozzájárulhat vascularis ellátórendszerünk fejlődéséhez. Az újonnan létrehozott Nemzeti Vaszkuláris Regiszter további jelentősége, hogy a tudományos elemző tevékenység mellett fontos szerepet játszhat az érgyógyászati minőségfejlesztésben is. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(24–25): 950–954.

The association of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter with mortality in the International Consortium of Vascular Registries

BACKGROUND

The mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair is high, despite improvements in perioperative care, centralization of emergency vascular surgical services, and the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The diameter of intact AAA has been shown to be a predictor of short- and long-term survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of AAA diameter on mortality for rAAA repair using contemporary data collected from the International Consortium of Vascular Registries and compare outcomes by sex and the type of repair patients received.

METHODS

Prospective registry data on repair of rAAA from seven countries were collected from 2010 to 2016. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality after EVAR and open surgical repair (OSR). Data were stratified by type of repair and sex. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) for the association between AAA diameter and perioperative mortality and the association between type of repair and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to adjust for differences in patient characteristics.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 6428 patients with a mean age ranging from 70.2 to 75.4 years; the mean AAA diameter was 7.7 ± 1.8 cm. Females had a significantly smaller AAA diameter at presentation compared with males (6.9 ± 1.6 cm vs 7.9 ± 1.8 cm; P < .001). who underwent OSR had larger AAA diameters compared with those who underwent EVAR (P < .001). Females who underwent repair were significantly older (P < .001). Males were more likely to have cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, and renal impairment. Overall, AAA diameter was a predictor of mortality in univariate and multivariate analysis. When analyzing EVAR and OSR separately, the impact of AAA diameter per cm increase on mortality was apparent in both males and females undergoing EVAR, but not OSR (EVAR: male OR, 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.16] and EVAR: female OR, 1.17 [95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.35]). The early mortality rate for males and females who underwent EVAR was 18.9% and 25.9% (P < .001), respectively. The corresponding mortality for males and females who underwent OSR was 30.2% and 38.6% (P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In these real-world international data, there is a significant association between rAAA diameters and early mortality in males and females. This association was more evident in patients undergoing EVAR, but not shown in OSR. Despite improvements in overall AAA repair outcomes, the risk of mortality after rAAA repair is consistently higher for females.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

One-year volume growth of abdominal aortic aneurysms measured by extended field-of-view ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Measurement of volume has the potential to detect subtle growth not recognized in the current surveillance paradigm of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Currently available three-dimensional ultrasound allows for estimation of AAA volume, but for most patients, the AAA extends beyond the ultrasound field-of-view and only allows visualization of a partial AAA volume. A new extended field-of-view three-dimensional ultrasound protocol (XFoV US) has been found to improve the proportion of patients with visualization of the full AAA volume.

METHODS

To investigate the applicability of the XFoV US protocol in estimating AAA volume growth in follow-up, 86 patients with AAAs were recruited from the surveillance program at a university hospital. All were imaged by XFoV US at baseline and at one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Assessment of full volume, based on visualization of the AAA neck and bifurcation at both baseline and one-year follow-up, was achieved in 67/86 (78%) of patients. One-year mean growth in maximum diameter was 2.8 mm (6%/year), in centerline length 2.9 mm (4%/year), and in volume 15.9 mL (19%/year). In 17/67 (25%) of patients, volume growth was detected in diameter-stable AAAs. Baseline XFoV US volume was associated with one-year AAA volume growth, while, conversely, maximum baseline diameter was not associated with one-year AAA diameter growth.

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that the XFoV US protocol provides a safe and repeatable modality for assessing AAA volume growth, and that AAA volume is a promising predictive measure of AAA growth.

Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Improved-Field-of-View 3-D Ultrasound Performs Comparably to Computed Tomographic Angiography

Three-dimensional ultrasound (US) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is limited by the field-of-view of the 3D-US transducer. To obtain an extended field-of-view (XFoV), two transducer navigation system-assisted US protocols have been developed: XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D. In this study, the XFoV US protocols were compared with the currently available 3D-US protocol with standard field-of-view (FoV-st) and the established gold standard, computed tomography angiography (CTA). A total of 65 patients with AAA were included, and AAA imaging was processed offline with prototype software. The novel XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D protocols allowed for assessment of full AAA volume in significantly more patients (45/65 [69%] and 43/65 [66%], respectively), compared with the current 3D-US standard, FoV-st (30/65 [46%] patients). The mean difference in AAA volume estimation between each XFoV US protocol and 3-D CTA differed significantly (XFoV-2D: 16.9 mL, XFoV-3D: 7.6 mL, p = 0.002), indicating that XFoV-3D agreed best with 3D-CTA. No significant difference was found in the variance of full AAA volume quantification between each XFoV US protocol and CTA (p = 0.49). It is concluded that the XFoV US protocols improved the generation of full AAA volumes compared with the currently available 3D-US technology, with AAA volume estimates comparable to CTA estimates.

Profiling abdominal aortic aneurysm growth with three-dimensional ultrasound

BACKGROUND

"Profiling" is a new method based on three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) allowing for direct comparison of baseline and follow-up diameters along the AAA length. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of profiling to visualize AAA changes at sub-maximum diameters, and to categorize the growth profiles.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively and consecutively included patients under AAA surveillance at a tertiary referral centre. 3D-US images of AAAs at baseline and at one-year follow-up were segmented, generating a centerline and a mesh of the aneurysm geometry. The mesh was processed to illustrate diameter changes of a given AAA. Three growth profiles were identified: A) Peak Growth: the largest, significant (≥3.6 mm) diameter difference occurred within a 10 mm margin to either side of the maximum baseline diameter; B) Edge Growth: at least one significant diameter difference and the criteria for Peak Growth did not apply; C) No Growth: all diameter differences were nonsignificant. A centerline length of ≥60 mm was assumed to capture a comparable segment of the wall geometry at baseline and follow-up. Cohen's kappa and Kaplan Meier analysis were used to analyze data.

RESULTS

In total, 186 patients had growth profiles generated. Of these, 28 (15%) were discarded, mainly based on inadequate centerline lengths (n= 21, 11.3%). The remaining patients were categorized into Edge Growth (n=83, 52%), No Growth (n=47, 30%), and Peak Growth (n=28, 18%).

CONCLUSIONS

Profiling interprets AAA growth at sub-maximum diameters. Half of the cohort had Edge Growth. These AAAs risk being classified as stable.

Vogl T, T. Grundmann R. Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

This review presents the surgical indications, surgical procedures, and results in the treatment of asymptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

An updated search of the literature on screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of AAA, based on the German clinical practice guideline published in 2018.

RESULTS

Surgery is indicated in men with an asymptomatic AAA ≥ 5.5 cm and in women, ≥ 5.0 cm. The indication in men is based on four randomized trials, while in women the data are not conclusive. The majority of patients with AAA (around 80%) meanwhile receive endovascular treatment (endovascular aortic repair, EVAR). Open surgery (open aneurysm repair, OAR) is reserved for patients with longer life expectancy and lower morbidity. The pooled 30-day mortality is 1.16% (95% confidence interval [0.92; 1.39]) following EVAR, 3.27% [2.7; 3.83] after OAR. Women have higher operative/interventional mortality than men (odds ratio 1.67%). The mortality for ruptured AAA is extremely high: around 80% of women and 70% of men die after AAA rupture. Ruptured AAA should, if possible, be treated via the endovascular approach, ideally with the patient under local anesthesia. Treatment at specialized centers guarantees the required expertise and infrastructure. Long-term periodic monitoring by mean of imaging (duplex sonography, plus computed tomography if needed) is essential, particularly following EVAR, to detect and (if appropriate) treat endoleaks, to document stable diameter of the eliminated aneurysmal sac, and to determine whether reintervention is necessary (long-term reintervention rate circa 18%).

CONCLUSION

Vascular surgery now offers a high degree of safety in the treatment of patients with asymptomatic AAA. Endovascular intervention is preferred.

Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease: Similarities and Differences Among Cardiovascular Guidelines and NICE Guidance

The development of endovascular techniques has improved abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) management over the past 2 decades. Different cardiovascular societies worldwide have recommended the endovascular approach as the standard of care in their currently available guidelines. While endovascular treatment has established its role in daily clinical practice, a new debate has arisen regarding the indications, appropriateness, limitations, and role of open surgery. To inform this debate, the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from 2010 to May 2020; the systematic search identified 5 articles published between 2011 and 2020 by 4 cardiovascular societies and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Four debatable domains were assessed and analyzed: diagnostic methods and screening, preoperative management, indications and treatment modalities, and postoperative follow-up and endoleak management. The review addresses controversial proposals as well as widely accepted recommendations and "gray zone" issues that need to be further investigated and analyzed, such as screening in women, medical management, and follow-up imaging. While the recommendations for AAA management have significant overlap and agreement among international cardiovascular societies, the NICE guidelines diverge regarding the role of open repair in aortic disease, recommending conventional surgery in most elective cases.