Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Specific lineage transition of tumor-associated macrophages elicits immune evasion of ascitic tumor cells in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (PM-GC), recognized as one of the deadliest cancers. However, whether and how the tumor cell-extrinsic tumor microenvironment (TME) is involved in the therapeutic failure remains unknown. Thus, this study systematically assessed the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in ascites from patients with PM-GC, and its contribution to dissemination and immune evasion of ascites-disseminated tumor cells (aDTCs).

METHODS

Sixty-three ascites and 43 peripheral blood (PB) samples from 51 patients with PM-GC were included in this study. aDTCs in ascites and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in paired PB were immunophenotypically profiled. Using single-cell RNA transcriptional sequencing (scRNA-seq), crosstalk between aDTCs and the TME features of ascites was inspected. Further studies on the mechanism underlying aDTCs-immune cells crosstalk were performed on in vitro cultured aDTCs.

RESULTS

Immune cells in ascites interact with aDTCs, prompting their immune evasion. Specifically, we found that the tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in ascites underwent a continuum lineage transition from cathepsinhigh (CTShigh) to complement 1qhigh (C1Qhigh) TAM. CTShigh TAM initially attracted the metastatic tumor cells to ascites, thereafter, transitioning terminally to C1Qhigh TAM to trigger overproliferation and immune escape of aDTCs. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that C1Qhigh TAMs significantly enhanced the expression of PD-L1 and NECTIN2 on aDTCs, which was driven by the activation of the C1q-mediated complement pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, we identified an immunosuppressive macrophage transition from CTShigh to C1Qhigh TAM in ascites from patients with PM-GC. This may contribute to developing potential TAM-targeted immunotherapies for PM-GC.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, multicenter, retrospective study

Background

Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have a high risk of recurrence. Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy brings new hope for these patients. The study aims to evaluate the safety, surgery-related outcomes and oncological outcomes for neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in real-world setting with a large sample size and long-term follow-up.

Methods

Patients with clinical stage IB-IIIB NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy at two Chinese institutions were included in this retrospective cohort study. Surgical and oncological outcomes of the enrolled NSCLC patients were collected and analyzed.

Results

There were 158 patients identified, of which 124 (78.5%) were at stage IIIA-IIIB and the remaining 34 (21.5%) were at stage IB-IIB. Forty-one patients (25.9%) received two cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, 80 (50.6%) had three cycles, and 37 (23.4%) had four cycles. Twenty-four patients (15.2%) experienced grade 3 or worse immune-related adverse events. The median interval time between the last neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was 37 [interquartile range (IQR), 31-43] days. Fifty-eight out of 96 (60.4%) central NSCLC patients who were expected to undergo complex surgery had the scope or the difficulty of operation reduced. Ninety-five (60.1%) patients achieved major pathologic response (MPR), including 62 (39.2%) patients with pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate regression analysis showed that no clinical factor other than programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was predictive of the pathological response. The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 27.1 months. MPR and pCR were significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Neither stage nor PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with long-term survival.

Conclusions

The neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy is a feasible strategy for NSCLC with a favorable rate of pCR/MPR, modified resection and 2-year survival. No clinical factor other than PD-L1 expression was predictive of the pathological response. pCR/MPR may be effective surrogate endpoint for survival in NSCLC patients who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy.

T-cell subsets and cytokines are indicative of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy responses in NSCLC

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is a promising treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the immunological mechanisms contributing to tumor regression and biomarkers corresponding to different pathological responses remain unclear.

METHODS

Using dynamic and paired blood samples from NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, we analyzed the frequencies of CD8 + T-cell and Treg subsets and their dynamic changes during neoadjuvant treatment through flow cytometry. Cytokine profiles and function-related gene expression of CD8 + T cells and Tregs were analyzed through flow cytometry and mRNA-seq. Infiltrating T-cell subsets in resected tissues from patients with different pathological responses were analyzed through multiplex immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Forty-two NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy were enrolled and then underwent surgical resection and pathological evaluation. Nineteen patients had pCR (45%), 7 patients had MPR (17%), and 16 patients had non-MPR (38%). In patients with pCR, the frequencies of CD137 + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.0475), PD-1 + Ki-67 + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.0261) and Tregs (P = 0.0317) were significantly different from those of non-pCR patients before treatment. pCR patients usually had low frequencies of CD137 + CD8 + T cells, PD-1 + Ki-67 + CD8 + T cells and Tregs, and their AUCs were higher than that of tissue PD-L1 expression. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy markedly improved CD8 + T-cell proliferation and activation, especially in pCR patients, as the frequencies of CD137 + CD8 + (P = 0.0136) and Ki-67 + CD8 + (P = 0.0391) T cells were significantly increased. The blood levels of cytokines such as IL-2 (P = 0.0391) and CXCL10 (P = 0.0195) were also significantly increased in the pCR group, which is consistent with the high density of activated cytotoxic T cells at the tumor site (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy drives CD8 + T cells toward a proliferative and active profile. The frequencies of CD137 + CD8 + T cells, PD-1 + Ki-67 + CD8 + T cells and Tregs at baseline might predict the response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC patients. The increase in IL-2 and CXCL10 might reflect the chemotaxis and enrichment of cytotoxic T cells at the tumor site and a better response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: promising strategies to overcoming challenges

Resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a significant challenge in the treatment of this disease. The mechanisms of resistance are multifactorial and include molecular target alterations and activation of alternative pathways, tumor heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment change, immune evasion, and immunosuppression. Promising strategies for overcoming resistance include the development of combination therapies, understanding the resistance mechanisms to better use novel drug targets, the identification of biomarkers, the modulation of the tumor microenvironment and so on. Ongoing research into the mechanisms of resistance and the development of new therapeutic approaches hold great promise for improving outcomes for patients with NSCLC. Here, we summarize diverse mechanisms driving resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in NSCLC and the latest potential and promising strategies to overcome the resistance to help patients who suffer from NSCLC.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy Following Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy in Resectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Among Chinese Populations: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment but may pose greater technical challenges for surgery. This study aims to assess the feasibility and oncological effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for resectable stage III NSCLC after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

METHODS

Initial stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy undergoing either VATS or open lobectomy at 6 medical centers during 2019-2023 were retrospectively identified. Perioperative outcomes and 2-year survival was analyzed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was employed to balance patient baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the total 143 patients, PSM yielded 62 cases each for VATS and OPEN groups. Induction-related adverse events were comparable between the 2 groups. VATS showed a 14.5% conversion rate. Notably, VATS decreased numeric rating scales for postoperative pain, shortened chest tube duration (5[4-7] vs. 6[5-8] days, P = .021), reduced postoperative comorbidities (21.0% vs. 37.1%, P = .048), and dissected less N1 lymph nodes (5[4-6] vs. 7[5-9], P = .005) compared with thoracotomy. Even when converted, VATS achieves perioperative outcomes equivalent to thoracotomy. Additionally, over a median follow-up of 29.5 months, VATS and thoracotomy demonstrated comparable 2-year recurrence-free survival (77.20% vs. 73.73%, P = .640), overall survival (87.22% vs. 88.00%, P = .738), cumulative incidences of cancer-related death, and recurrence patterns. Subsequent subgroup comparisons and multivariate Cox analysis likewise revealed no statistical difference between VATS and thoracotomy.

CONCLUSION

VATS is a viable and effective option for resectable stage III NSCLC patients following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, leading to decreased surgical-related pain, earlier chest tube removal, reduced postoperative complications, and similar survival outcomes compared to thoracotomy.

Subsequent surgical treatment or maintenance immunotherapy in stage III lung cancer patients achieving a favorable response following neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A matched retrospective cohort study from the surgical perspective

BACKGROUND

Current treatment strategies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are highly individualized and subject to ongoing debates. In the era of immunotherapy, surgery assumes a critical role. The aim of this study was to investigate if subsequent surgical intervention, following a favorable response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy, could yield a more favorable prognosis for patients with advanced stage III NSCLC compared to the continuation of immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

METHODS

We included patients whose tumors exhibited a favorable response (including partial response [PR] and complete response [CR]) to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. These patients were categorized into two groups based on their subsequent treatment plans: surgical and nonsurgical (continuation of maintenance immunotherapy and chemotherapy). The efficacy and long-term prognosis of these groups were compared after matching them in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores.

RESULTS

In total, 186 patients (93 in each group) were included in this study after matching via propensity scores. The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 96.0%, 88.5%, and 93.1%, 80.7% in the surgical group, and 93.2%, 83.1%, and 57.7%, 50.4% in the nonsurgical group, respectively. Patients in the surgical group exhibited significantly superior PFS and OS compared to those in the nonsurgical group (p = 0.025 and p = 0.00086). Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed ΔBMI, Δtumor size reduction, tumor response, earlier clinical stage (IIIb vs. IIIa), and surgery as independent protective factor for patient prognosis. We further selected 101 patients with CR (39 in the surgical group and 62 in the nonsurgical group) and found that patients in the surgical group were significantly better in both PFS and OS. Our subgroup analysis in postoperative patients demonstrated that different surgical strategies did not significantly affect the long-term prognosis of patients (PFS and OS) but could impact their perioperative experience.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced stage III NSCLC, whose tumors achieved PR and CR after 2-4 cycles of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, experience a more promising prognosis with subsequent surgical intervention compared with the continued immunotherapy. Despite encountering formidable obstacles, such as protracted surgical procedures and associated trauma, we must rise to the challenge and unleash the power of surgery after immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) combined with chemotherapy can improve non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients' pathological responses and show promising improvements in survival. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a systemic inflammatory disease, and its associated abnormal inflammatory response affects not only the immunotherapy efficacy but also immune-related adverse events. It remains unclear whether NSCLC patients with COPD can benefit from neoadjuvant ICIs combined with chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective observational clinical study was conducted on 105 consecutive NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant ICIs combined with chemotherapy at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Tianjin Chest Hospital between April 2020 and April 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 74 NSCLC patients were included in the study, including 30 patients with COPD and 44 patients without COPD. The percentage of patients with a pathological complete response (PCR) was higher in the COPD group than in the non-COPD group (43.3% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.042). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with PCR showed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was statistically significant for presence of COPD (OR = 3.020, 95%CI: 1.042-8.757; P = 0.042). Major pathological response (66.7% vs. 50%, P = 0.155), R0 resection rate (96.7% vs.93.2%, P = 0.642), N2 lymph node downstaging(92.3% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.182) and objective response rate (70% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.57) were not significantly different between the groups. Progression-free survival(PFS) was not reached in the COPD group and 17 months (95%CI: 12.1-21.9) in the non-COPD group, with statistically significance (χ2 = 6.247, P = 0.012). Multivariate Cox's regression analysis showed that the adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) was statistically significant for presence of COPD (HRadj = 0.321, 95%CI: 0.111-0.930; P = 0.036). The grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events in the COPD group were leukopenia (3.3%, 6.7%), neutropenia (3.3%, 6.7%), fatigue (6.7%, 0%), gastrointestinal reactions (3.3%, 0%), and hypothyroidism (3.3%, 0%). In the non-COPD group, the corresponding adverse events were leukopenia (6.8%, 6.8%), neutropenia (3.3%, 6.8%), fatigue (2.3%, 0%), gastrointestinal reactions (2.3%, 0%), and hypothyroidism (2.3%, 0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicates that the presence of COPD may improve PCR, prolong PFS, and have an acceptable safety profile in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant ICIs combined with chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in operable nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In localized nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) systemic recurrences after surgery are common. Therefore, adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used. With the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in metastatic disease the question is whether ICIs can further improve the outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

In several phase I/II trials, major pathological response (MPR) rates with several ICIs between 7% and 50% were seen. No major additional side effects occurred. In combination with chemotherapy CheckMate-816 randomized additional neoadjuvant nivolumab and achieved a high pathological complete response (pCR) rate and a better event-free survival (EFS) - without negatively influencing surgery. More randomized trials are performed with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and adjuvant treatment after surgery. In Keynote-671, pembrolizumab is used pre and postoperatively with a significantly higher EFS rate at 2 years (62.4% vs. 40.6%). Similar preliminary results are reported in the AEGEAN (durvalumab) and Neotorch (toripalimab) trials. Higher tumour stage and MPR, partly programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumour mutational burden (TMB) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) are correlated with efficacy.

SUMMARY

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy improves MPR and EFS rates, especially in more advanced tumours and tumours expressing PD-L1 - without relevantly increasing toxicities. But further and longer evaluation is needed.

MYH16 upregulation is associated with lung adenocarcinoma aggressiveness and immune infiltration

Myosin heavy chain 16 (MYH16) may significantly affect cell cycle progression. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence about the clinical relevance of MYH16 upregulation in pan cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). MYH16 expression patterns were evaluated in various bioinformatics databases using The Cancer Genome Atlas data set. Clinical and pathological factor data were employed to risk-stratify patients. The Kaplan-Meier plotter approach was used to estimate survival rates. Tumor immune infiltration was explored via the TIMER tool, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to identify the pathways involved in MYH16 upregulation. The results showed that MYH16 was abnormally upregulated in pan cancers, including LUAD. MYH16 expression induction in LUAD was found to be related to the tumor stage. Furthermore, MYH16 upregulation was correlated with LUAD development and worse overall survival, particularly in women. Notably, MYH16 overexpression in LUAD tissues corresponded to the amount of immune infiltration in the tumor. Additionally, univariate Cox hazard regression analysis revealed that MYH16 may be an independent prognostic indicator for LUAD. Furthermore, a nomogram was constructed according to MYH16 expression and clinical characteristics. BMP6 expression deficiency may be a key factor contributing to MYH16 upregulation in LUAD. Finally, GSEA demonstrated that MYH16 might mediate meiosis and gene silencing through RNA signaling pathways. This study, for the first time, showed that MYH16 upregulation in LUAD is associated with various risk factors, increased cancer aggressiveness, enhanced infiltration of tumor immune cells, and reduced survival rates.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy with Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score and Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICT) combined with radical lung cancer resection for the treatment of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To adjust for confounding factors, we innovatively adopted two matching methods: propensity score (PS) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with resectable NSCLC treated with NCT or NICT combined with radical lung cancer resection using propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:1 and IPTW to balance potential bias.

Results

After PSM, 116 pairs of patients who had undergone NCT or NICT were selected for the final analysis. The pathological complete remission (pCR) and major pathological remission (MPR) rates were significantly better in the NICT group than in the NCT group (pCR rate of 44.8% vs 2.6%, P< 0.001; MPR rate of 66.4% vs 20.7%, P< 0.001). No significant difference was seen between the NICT and NCT groups in terms of postoperative complications (12.1% vs 9.5%, P=0.182). Patients in the NICT group had significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival(OS) than those in the NCT group ([3-year DFS: 75.2% vs 43.3%, P< 0.001] and [3-year OS: 91.5% vs 58.0%, P< 0.001]). Among all patients, those with postoperative pathology of pCR had better DFS (P< 0.001) and OS (P= 0.009). Patients with postoperative pathology of MPR had better DFS (P< 0.001) and OS (P< 0.001). The IPTW method yielded similar pathologic and prognostic results.

Conclusion

Patients with resectable NSCLC treated with NICT had better pathological responses and prognosis, than those treated with NCT, and the safety profiles of NICT and NCT were similar.

Thyroid dysfunction induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors and tumor progression during neoadjuvant therapy of non‑small cell lung cancer: A case report and literature review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a demonstrable treatment response in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, immune-related adverse events and tumor progression in patients administered ICIs are of great concern. The present case study is of a 59-year-old male with NSCLC (squamous, stage IIIA) who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy before surgery. The patient first developed hyperthyroidism and then hypothyroidism, indicating that ICI-related thyroid dysfunction had occurred. Furthermore, the patient suffered from tumor progression and could not undergo resection. The present case called attention to the prevention and management of irAEs, and the precaution that should be taken with regard to tumor progression. The case also suggested that the development of ICI-related thyroid dysfunction may not predict an improved response to ICI therapies, which needs further evidence to illustrate.

Antiplatelet and Wound Healing Implications of Immunotherapy and Targeted Cancer Therapies in the Perioperative Period

The traditional paradigm of oncologic treatment centered on cytotoxic chemotherapy has undergone tremendous advancement during the last 15 yr with the advent of immunotherapy and targeted cancer therapies. These agents, including small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, are highly specific to individual tumor characteristics and can prevent cell growth and tumorigenesis by inhibiting specific molecular targets or single oncogenes. While generally better tolerated than traditional chemotherapy, these therapies are associated with unique constellations of adverse effects. Of particular importance in the perioperative and periprocedural settings are hematologic abnormalities, particularly antiplatelet effects with increased risk of bleeding, and implications for wound healing. This narrative review discusses targeted cancer therapies and provides recommendations for physicians managing these patients' care as it relates to procedural or surgical interventions.

Does major pathological response after neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in resectable nonsmall-cell lung cancers predict prognosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Overall survival is the gold-standard outcome measure for phase 3 trials, but the need for a long follow-up period can delay the translation of potentially effective treatment to clinical practice. The validity of major pathological response (MPR) as a surrogate of survival for non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant immunotherapy remains unclear.

METHODS

Eligibility was resectable stage I-III NSCLC and delivery of PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibitors prior to resection; other forms/modalities of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies were allowed. Statistics utilized the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or random-effect model depending on the heterogeneity ( I2 ).

RESULTS

Fifty-three trials (seven randomized, 29 prospective nonrandomized, 17 retrospective) were identified. The pooled rate of MPR was 53.8%. Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy achieved higher MPR (OR 6.19, 4.39-8.74, P <0.00001). MPR was associated with improved disease-free survival/progression-free survival/event-free survival (HR 0.28, 0.10-0.79, P =0.02) and overall survival (HR 0.80, 0.72-0.88, P <0.0001). Patients with stage III (vs I/II) and PD-L1 ≥1% (vs <1%) more likely achieved MPR (OR 1.66,1.02-2.70, P =0.04; OR 2.21,1.28-3.82, P =0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy achieved higher MPR in NSCLC patients, and increased MPR might be associated with survival benefits treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. It appears that the MPR may serve as a surrogate endpoint of survival to evaluate neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib and chemotherapy versus apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

Programed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, apatinib, and chemotherapy show synergistic antitumor effect in gastric cancer. This study aimed to evaluate this combination as a neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). In this retrospective study, data from 179 LAGC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy with a PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib and chemotherapy (PAC group, n=56), apatinib and chemotherapy (AC group, n=50), or chemotherapy alone (C group, n=73) were analyzed. The PAC group displayed a numerically higher radiologic objective response rate than the AC group (73.2% vs. 60.0%, P=0.149) and significantly higher than the C group (73.2% vs. 35.6%, P<0.001). Tumor resection rates between the PAC and AC groups were not significantly different (100.0% vs. 94.0%, P=0.102) but were higher in the PAC group compared to the C group (100.0% vs. 89.0%, P=0.010). Pathological evaluations revealed comparable R0 resection rates across all groups (P=0.873) and a non-significantly higher pathological complete response rate in the PAC group compared to the AC group (26.8% vs. 17.0%, P=0.236), while significantly higher than the C group (26.8% vs. 7.7%, P=0.005). Moreover, the PAC group exhibited a longer progression-free survival compared to the AC (P=0.036) and C (P<0.001) groups, an extended disease-free survival compared to the C group (P=0.002), and improved overall survival compared to the AC (P=0.028) and C (P=0.002) groups. Adverse events were generally comparable, with the highest incidence of peripheral neuropathy observed in the PAC group (26.8%, P=0.020). PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib and chemotherapy may represent an effective neoadjuvant regimen for LAGC management, necessitating further validation.

Effect of stage shift and immunotherapy treatment on lung cancer survival outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Non-small-cell lung cancer mortality has declined at a faster rate than incidence due to multiple factors, including changes in smoking behaviour, early detection which shifts diagnosis, and novel therapies. Limited resources require that we quantify the contribution of early detection versus novel therapies in improving lung cancer survival outcomes.

METHODS

Non-small-cell lung cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data were queried and divided into: (i) stage IV diagnosed in 2015 (n = 3774) and (ii) stage I-III diagnosed in 2010-2012 (n = 15 817). Multivariable Cox-proportional hazards models were performed to assess the independent association of immunotherapy or diagnosis at stage I/II versus III with survival.

RESULTS

Patients treated with immunotherapy had significantly better survival than those who did not (HRadj: 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.56), as did those diagnosed at stage I/II versus stage III (HRadj: 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.37). Patients on immunotherapy had a 10.7-month longer survival than those who were not. Stage I/II patients had an average survival benefit of 34 months, compared to stage III. If 25%% of stage IV patients not on immunotherapy received it, there would be a gain of 22 292 person-years survival per 100 000 diagnoses. A switch of only 25% from stage III to stage I/II would correspond to 70 833 person-years survival per 100 000 diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort study, earlier stage at diagnosis contributed to life expectancy by almost 3 years, while gains from immunotherapy would contribute ½ year of survival. Given the relative affordability of early detection, risk reduction through increased screening should be optimized.

Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has been increasingly applied to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the feasibility and oncological efficacy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is scarce. This study aims to assess the superiorities of RATS over (VATS) concerning short-term outcomes in treating NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Methods

NSCLC patients receiving RATS or VATS lobectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were retrospectively identified. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival profiles were analyzed.

Results

Forty-six NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were included and divided into the RATS (n=15) and VATS (n=31) groups. The baseline clinical characteristics and induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.050). The 30-day mortality in the RATS and VATS groups were 0% and 3.23%, respectively (p=1.000). Patients undergoing RATS were associated with reduced surgical-related intensive unit care (ICU) stay than those receiving VATS (0.0 [0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-1.0] days, p=0.026). Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 LNs (6.27 ± 1.94 vs 4.90 ± 1.92, p=0.042) and LN stations (3.07 ± 1.03 vs 2.52 ± 0.57, p=0.038) compared with VATS. By comparison, no difference was found in surgical outcomes, pathological results, and postoperative complications between the RATS and VATS groups (all p>0.050). Finally, RATS and VATS achieved comparable one-year recurrence-free survival (82.96% vs. 85.23%, p=0.821) and the timing of central nervous system, LN, and bone recurrences (all p>0.050).

Conclusion

RATS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, reducing surgical-related ICU stay, assessing increased N1 LNs and stations, and achieving similar survival profiles to VATS.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment + chemotherapy has been used for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this treatment is insufficient, particularly in Chinese patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for locally advanced NSCLC. For this, 50 patients with locally advanced NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed; of these, 23 patients received pre-operative camrelizumab or sintilimab + chemotherapy (ICI + chemo group) and 27 patients received pre-operative chemotherapy alone (chemo group). The objective response rate (73.9 vs. 44.4%, P=0.035) was superior in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Nevertheless, surgical resection rate (100.0 vs. 88.9%, P=0.240), major pathological response (60.9 vs. 41.7%, P=0.188) and complete pathological response (CPR; 30.4 vs. 8.3%, P=0.072) were not significantly different in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Following adjustment, ICI + chemo was independently associated with an elevated CPR (P=0.029). Disease-free survival (DFS) was prolonged in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group (1-year DFS, 94.1 vs. 81.6%; 2-year DFS, 80.7 vs. 42.9%; P=0.047), while no significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS; 1-year OS, 100.0 vs. 95.7%; 2-year OS, 90.0 vs. 64.9%; P=0.187). Additionally, the majority of adverse event incidences (apart from leukopenia) did not differ significantly between the ICI + chemo and chemo groups (all P>0.050). On the whole, the present study demonstrated that neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy exhibited adequate efficacy and acceptable toxicity compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Intensive cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Two cycles of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicity in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, approximately 25% of patients relapsed within 1 year after surgery, indicating that a short course of treatment may not be sufficient. Therefore, exploring the effects of intensive treatment is needed for optimal clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Locally advanced ESCC patients were administered three cycles of camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and capecitabine, followed by thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was pathologic response. Secondary endpoints included safety, feasibility, radiologic response, survival outcomes, and immunologic/genomic correlates of efficacy.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Forty-two patients received surgery, and R0 resection was achieved in all cases. The complete and major pathological response rates were 33.3% and 64.3%, respectively, and the objective response rate was 80.0%. Three cycles of treatment significantly improved T down-staging compared to two cycles (P = 0.03). The most common treatment-related adverse events were grades 1-2, and no surgical delay was reported. With a median follow-up of 24.3 months, the 1-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were both 97.6%, and the 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 92.3% and 97.6%, respectively. Three patients experienced disease recurrence or metastasis ranging from 12.5 to 25.8 months after surgery, and one patient died 6 months after surgery due to cardiovascular disease. Neither programmed death-ligand 1 expression nor tumor mutational burden was associated with pathological response. An increased infiltration of CD56dim natural killer cells in the pretreatment tumor was correlated with better pathological response in the primary tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems probable that intensive cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and capecitabine increased tumor regression and improved survival outcomes. Randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000029807, Registered February 14, 2020, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=49459 .

Predicting response and toxicity to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer using antibodies to frameshift neoantigens

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new class of blood-based biomarkers, anti-frameshift peptide antibodies, for predicting both tumor responses and adverse immune events to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies in advanced lung cancer patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Serum samples were obtained from 74 lung cancer patients prior to palliative PD-(L)1 therapies with subsequently recorded tumor responses and immune adverse events (irAEs). Pretreatment samples were assayed on microarrays of frameshift peptides (FSPs), representing ~ 375,000 variant peptides that tumor cells can be informatically predicted to produce from translated mRNA processing errors. Serum-antibodies specifically recognizing these ligands were measured. Binding activities preferentially associated with best-response and adverse-event outcomes were determined. These antibody bound FSPs were used in iterative resampling analyses to develop predictive models of tumor response and immune toxicity.

RESULTS

Lung cancer serum samples were classified based on predictive models of ICI treatment outcomes. Disease progression was predicted pretreatment with ~ 98% accuracy in the full cohort of all response categories, though ~ 30% of the samples were indeterminate. This model was built with a heterogeneous sample cohort from patients that (i) would show either clear response or stable outcomes, (ii) would be administered either single or combination therapies and (iii) were diagnosed with different lung cancer subtypes. Removing the stable disease, combination therapy or SCLC groups from model building increased the proportion of samples classified while performance remained high. Informatic analyses showed that several of the FSPs in the all-response model mapped to translations of variant mRNAs from the same genes. In the predictive model for treatment toxicities, binding to irAE-associated FSPs provided 90% accuracy pretreatment, with no indeterminates. Several of the classifying FSPs displayed sequence similarity to self-proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-FSP antibodies may serve as biomarkers for predicting ICI outcomes when tested against ligands corresponding to mRNA-error derived FSPs. Model performances suggest this approach might provide a single test to predict treatment response to ICI and identify patients at high risk for immunotherapy toxicities.

Advances in efficacy prediction and monitoring of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become mainstream in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The idea of harnessing the immune system to fight cancer is fast developing. Neoadjuvant treatment in NSCLC is undergoing unprecedented change. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations not only seem to achieve population-wide treating coverage irrespective of PD-L1 expression but also enable achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). Despite these recent advancements in neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, not all patients respond favorably to treatment with ICIs plus chemo and may even suffer from severe immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Similar to selection for target therapy, identifying patients most likely to benefit from chemo-immunotherapy may be valuable. Recently, several prognostic and predictive factors associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in NSCLC, such as tumor-intrinsic biomarkers, tumor microenvironment biomarkers, liquid biopsies, microbiota, metabolic profiles, and clinical characteristics, have been described. However, a specific and sensitive biomarker remains to be identified. Recently, the construction of prediction models for ICI therapy using novel tools, such as multi-omics factors, proteomic tests, host immune classifiers, and machine learning algorithms, has gained attention. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the different positive prognostic and predictive factors in treating preoperative patients with ICIs, highlight the recent advances made in the efficacy prediction of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and provide an outlook for joint predictors.

Prognostic influence of PD-1/PD-L1 suppressors in combination with chemotherapeutic agents for non-small cell pulmonary carcinoma: system review and meta-analysis

Background

Lung cancer is a common malignant tumor, which is seriously harmful to human life and health. Nowadays, it has gradually become one of the best treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to combine immunotherapy and chemotherapy, and its clinical efficacy is preliminary. Nevertheless, substantial differences exist between various studies and various indicators. Despite their unconvincing results, high-quality research evidence is needed to support them. In this case, further correlative studies are necessary to investigate the prognostic outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 suppressors in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs in NSCLC.

Methods

The online public databases were searchable for the clinical trials that consisted of NSCLC patients who had concluded their chemotherapy and who had accepted PD-1/PD-L1 suppressors. The time-span of the search spanned from the beginning to the end of the database. Two investigators retrieved the data independently. RevMan 5.3 statistical software was utilized for the assessment of bias risk. The software followed the Cochrane Handbook 5.3 guidelines.

Results

There were seven clinically controlled studies with 2781 NSCLC samples finally included in this study. A meta-analysis of the post-treatment overall response rate (ORR) was undertaken. A remarkably higher ORR rate was observed in the study group (p<0.05). Study participants had a noticeably longer PFS (HR=0.61, 95% CI=0.54-0.70, P<0.00001). Study participants had markedly longer overall survival (OS) (HR=0.651, 95% CI=0.52-0.82, P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) of Grade 3 or above was not clinically clearly different (P>0.05), as demonstrated by the incidence of AEs. The funnel plots were separately charted in accordance with ORR rate, PFE, OS, and Grade 3 AEs. The majority of the funnel plots were symmetrical and a minority of funnel plots were asymmetrical, indicating the heterogeneity of research and the limited evidence available may lead to some publication bias in the contained literature.

Conclusion

The combined PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with conventional chemotherapy can dramatically elevate the prognosis of NSCLC patients, obviously enhancing the ORR rate and prolonging their PFS and OS. Furthermore, it was found that adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to conventional chemotherapy did not result in any additional adverse effects.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Myocarditis and Cardiomyopathy: A Translational Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized oncology and transformed the treatment of various malignancies. By unleashing the natural immunological brake of the immune system, ICIs were initially considered an effective, gentle therapy with few side effects. However, accumulated clinical knowledge reveals that ICIs are associated with inflammation and tissue damage in multiple organs, leading to immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Most irAEs involve the skin and gastrointestinal tract; however, cardiovascular involvement is associated with very high mortality rates, and its underlying pathomechanisms are poorly understood. Ranging from acute myocarditis to chronic cardiomyopathies, ICI-induced cardiotoxicity can present in various forms and entities. Revealing the inciting factors, understanding the pathogenesis, and identifying effective treatment strategies are needed to improve the care of tumor patients and our understanding of the immune and cardiovascular systems.

Role of Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is being increasingly adopted, but questions about the most appropriate applications remain. Although patients with resectable NSCLC are often treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy or targeted therapies +/− radiotherapy, they still have a high risk of recurrence and death. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4) have provided a new and effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Therefore, it is possible that ICIs for early-stage NSCLC may follow the pattern established in metastatic disease. Currently, there are several ongoing trials to determine the efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with local or regional disease. To date, only nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy has been approved by the U.S. FDA in the preoperative setting, but data continue to evolve rapidly, and treatment guidelines need to be determined. In this article, we review the current preclinical and clinical evidence on neoadjuvant ICIs alone and combination in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in resectable clinical stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Pembrolizumab has been shown to be effective and safe in improving the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the effectiveness and safty of pembrolizumab in the induction treatment of patients with potential resectable clinical stage III NSCLC remains undetermined.

Methods

A total of 25 patients who received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for preoperative stage III NSCLC between August 2020 and November 2021 in Zhongshan Hospital were retrospectively evaluated, and 21 of them were followed by pulmonary resection. The neoadjuvant treatment was as follows: intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg) on day 1, carboplatin [target area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL] or cisplatin (75 mg/m²) on day 1, and pemetrexed (500 mg/m² for adenocarcinoma) or nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m² for other subtypes) on day 1 of every 21-day cycle up to two or three cycles.

Results

The mean age of all 25 patients was 65 years, of whom 22 were men and 3 were women. Seventeen were diagnosed before treatment as clinical stage IIIA, seven as IIIB, and one as IIB. All received neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. Following induction therapy, 21 patients with stable disease or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) underwent surgical resection without delay. Among the patients who underwent operation, major pathological response (MPR) was achieved in 13 patients, including 6 (28.6%) patients achieved a complete pathological response (CPR). Two patients with partial radiologic remission refused operative treatment, one had progressive disease (PD), and another developed a grade immune pneumonia and could not tolerate surgery. However, none of the adverse events caused surgery delays or deaths.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy could be considered reliable for clinical stage III NSCLC, but needs to be validated with more robust clinical trials.

Deep learning for predicting major pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A multicentre study

Background

This study, based on multicentre cohorts, aims to utilize computed tomography (CT) images to construct a deep learning model for predicting major pathological response (MPR) to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and further explore the biological basis under its prediction.

Methods

274 patients undergoing curative surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC at 4 centres from January 2019 to December 2021 were included and divided into a training cohort, an internal validation cohort, and an external validation cohort. ShuffleNetV2x05-based features of the primary tumour on the CT scans within the 2 weeks preceding neoadjuvant administration were employed to develop a deep learning score for distinguishing MPR and non-MPR. To reveal the underlying biological basis of the deep learning score, a genetic analysis was conducted based on 25 patients with RNA-sequencing data.

Findings

MPR was achieved in 54.0% (n = 148) patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of the deep learning score to predict MPR was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58–0.86) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.58–0.85) in the internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively. After integrating the clinical characteristic into the deep learning score, the combined model achieved satisfactory performance in the internal validation (AUC: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64–0.89) and external validation cohorts (AUC: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62–0.87). In the biological basis exploration for the deep learning score, a high deep learning score was associated with the downregulation of pathways mediating tumour proliferation and the promotion of antitumour immune cell infiltration in the microenvironment.

Interpretation

The proposed deep learning model could effectively predict MPR in NSCLC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Funding

This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China, China (2017YFA0205200); National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (91959126, 82022036, 91959130, 81971776, 81771924, 6202790004, 81930053, 9195910169, 62176013, 8210071009); Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China (L182061); Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (XDB38040200); Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (GJJSTD20170004, QYZDJ-SSW-JSC005); Shanghai Hospital Development Center, China (SHDC2020CR3047B); and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China (21YF1438200).

Preoperative immunochemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of the clinical outcomes, optimal number of cycles, and peripheral immune markers

Background

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a particular focus on analyzing the optimal treatment cycle and peripheral immune markers.

Methods

Eligible patients with biopsy-confirmed stage III NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy between January 1st, 2018 and March 30th, 2021 were identified, and their oncological outcomes were collected.

Results

A total of 115 patients were identified, among whom 61, 51, and three cases were classified as clinical stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC at presentation, respectively. The objective response rate was 61.7% (71/115) after immunochemotherapy. The most frequent surgical procedure was lobectomy, performed in 91 (79.1%) cases, and all patients had microscopic-free margins. Major pathological response (MPR) was observed in 64 (55.7%) patients, among whom 44 (38.3%) achieved a complete pathological response; pathological-confirmed lymph node downstage (cN2-3 to ypN0-1) was described in 73.6% (67/91) of patients with cN2-3 diseases. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of all enrolled patients was 23.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.9-31.3] months, while for patients with residual tumors of more than 10%, the median DFS was 18.1 (95% CI: 12.5-23.8) months. The post-hoc multivariable analysis showed that three [odds ratio (OR), 4.78; 95% CI: 1.17-19.55] and four (OR: 6.50; 95% CI: 1.12-37.54) cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were prone to higher MPR rates compared to two cycles in patients that were classified as complete/partial response (CR/PR). However, adding over five cycles was not associated with a higher MPR rate (OR, 0.91; 95% CI: 0.15-5.47). The pretreatment lymphocyte count level (1.89±0.68 vs. 1.59±0.63, P=0.019) and monocyte count level (0.71±0.32 vs. 0.59, P=0.020) were significantly higher in MPR patients compared to non-MPR patients.

Conclusions

The present study confirmed a favorable real-world tumor downstage efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC. Even though CR/PR was achieved, it is still beneficial when extended into 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy significantly improved patients' overall survival when compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors displayed considerable advantages in neoadjuvant therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the specific application of neoadjuvant immunotherapy has not been well determined, and the long-term prognostic data of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy combined with surgical resection of NSCLC remains limited. In this study, we intended to assess the efficacy of the neoadjuvant therapy of the PD-1 inhibitor and long-term prognosis in patients with resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed NSCLC surgical patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy in our hospital, and divided them into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and a neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group. The propensity score matching method was used to evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable lung cancer, and the long-term prognosis of these two groups was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 62 cases were enrolled, including 20 patients (20/62, 32.26%) in the immunotherapy group and 42 patients (42/62, 67.74%) in the chemotherapy group. The clinical baseline data of these two groups were balanced. In the immunotherapy group, all patients had tumor regression in imaging finding (tumor regression ratio: 11.88% - 75.00%). In the chemotherapy group, 30 patients had tumor regression (tumor regression ratio: 2.70% - 58.97%). The R0 removal rates of cancers were comparable between the immunotherapy group and chemotherapy group (19/20, 95.00% vs. 39/42, 92.86%, P=1.000). The two groups were balanced in complete minimally invasive surgery, pneumonectomy, operative duration, blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. The immunotherapy group had more sleeve resection (36.84% vs. 10.26%, p=0.039) including bronchial sleeve and vascular sleeve, higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (57.89% vs. 5.13%, P<0.001) and major pathologic response (MPR) rate (78.95% vs. 10.26%, P<0.001). There were no differences in survival curves for: smoker and non-smoker, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, or right lung cancer and left lung cancer. Moreover, patients who achieved MPR (including pCR) had significantly better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Patients in immunotherapy group had significantly better OS and longer DFS than those in chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can provide better OS and DFS and improving pCR and MPR rates by shrinking tumors.This study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number ChiCTR2200060433. http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=170157&htm=4.

The optimal neoadjuvant regimen for nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and complications of different neoadjuvant to determine the optimal regimens for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Web of Science, and PubMed databases was conducted through June 3, 2021, reporting a comparison of chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and immunotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 3462 studies, 25 were considered for evidence synthesis. 1035 patients who received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery did not prolong the overall survival (OS) compared with 1038 patients who received surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% CI 1·00-1·28, P = 0·05). 1192 patients received chemoradiotherapy and 864 patients received chemotherapy or radiotherapy; chemoradiotherapy prolonged the OS compared with chemotherapy (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0·29 to 0.95, P = .03). Compared with 110 patients who received other therapy, 93 patients who received immunotherapy had prolonged the OS (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1·08-2·25, P = .02). Chemoradiotherapy increased the pathological response rate (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1·33-2·12, P < .0001), and grade 3 and 4 adverse effects were not increased (HR 5.90, 95% CI 0.88 to 39.60, P = .007). Immunotherapy increased the pathological response (HR 2.79, 95% CI 1·71-4·54, P < .0001), with no significant effects on grades 3 and 4 adverse(HR 0.71, 95% CI 0·19-2·64, P = .61).

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that chemotherapy may prolong OS and PFS, but not statistically significant; however, the combination of chemotherapy and radiation did show an advantage, and immunotherapy may be also the choice for neoadjuvant therapy.

A Phase 1 Study of Concurrent Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Plus Chemoradiation Followed by Consolidation Pembrolizumab in Patients With Resectable Stage IIIA NSCLC

Introduction

Evidence supports the addition of immunotherapy to definitive chemoradiation for unresectable stage IIIA NSCLC. Adding pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC requires study for safety and feasibility.

Methods

Patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC received neoadjuvant cisplatin, etoposide, and pembrolizumab concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. Patients without progression underwent resection followed by 6 months of consolidation pembrolizumab. Safety and feasibility were defined as less than or equal to 30% grade 3 or higher pulmonary toxicity or any grade 4 or 5 nonhematologic toxicity. A total of 10 patients were to be enrolled initially. If less than or equal to two patients had events, another 10 were to be enrolled.

Results

The study closed after enrolling nine patients. The median age was 66 (range: 49–76) years. A total of 67% were female. Median follow-up was 38.3 months. Serious adverse events occurred in seven patients, including two grade 5 events: one sudden cardiac arrest in the neoadjuvant phase and one fatal pneumocystis pneumonia after resection. Eight patients were assessable for response. The overall response rate was 67%. Six underwent complete resection. Four achieved pathologic complete response, whereas one additional patient had complete nodal clearance. Median progression-free survival has not been reached. The 3-year overall survival was 64%.

Conclusions

Adding pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, and radiotherapy in resectable stage IIIA NSCLC resulted in an encouraging pathologic complete response rate. Higher-than-expected toxicities necessitated trial closure after meeting the rule for infeasibility. The relationship of grade 5 events to the addition of pembrolizumab is unclear.

A real-world comparison between neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy alone for resectable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy on pulmonary resection and related outcomes had been poorly reported in previous studies. The present study aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and intraoperative difficulty in the following surgery, in comparison with chemotherapy alone in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed clinical stages IB-IIIB(T3-4N2) NSCLC, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy + PD-1 inhibitors (PD-1 + Chemo group) or chemotherapy alone (Chemo group) followed by surgery between December 2018 and December 2020 were included. The clinicopathological characteristics were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 69 NSCLC patients in the PD-1 + Chemo group and 121 in the Chemo group. The major pathological response (MPR) rate in the PD-1 + Chemo group was 49.3%, higher than that of 19.0% in the Chemo group (p < 0.001). The 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 79.3% and 60.2%, respectively, in the two groups (p = 0.048). Multivariate analysis identified surgical radicality (hazard ratio (HR), 2.954, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.527-5.714, p = 0.001), and pathological response (MPR(CR) vs. SD(PD), HR, 0.248, 95% CI, 0.107-0.572, p = 0.001) to be independent prognostic factors for DFS. Lobectomy was performed in 73.9% and 66.1% of patients, respectively, and bronchial sleeve resection/bronchoplasty rate was also comparable (43.4% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.688). More patients in the PD-1 + Chemo group received vascular sleeve resection/angioplasty (15.9% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.039) and pericardial resection (10.1% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.038). After propensity score matching analysis, pericardial resection rate was still slightly higher in the PD-1 + Chemo group (9.4% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.05). Perioperative morbidities within 30 days and mortality in 90 days were comparable between groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC is safe and feasible, with higher MPR rates, as well as favorable DFS than chemotherapy alone. Surgical complexity might be increased in certain patients, with comparable perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for approximately 80–85% of all lung cancers and at present represents the main cause of cancer death among both men and women. To date, surgery represents the cornerstone; nevertheless, around 40% of completely resected patients develop disease recurrence. Therefore, combining neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy and surgery might lead to improved survival. Immunotherapy is normally well tolerated, although significant adverse reactions have been reported in certain patients treated with inhibitors of immune checkpoints. In this review, we explore the current literature on the use of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy followed by surgery for treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, with particular attention to the histological aspects, ongoing trials, and the most common surgical approaches. In conclusion, neoadjuvant immunotherapy whether combined or not with chemotherapy reveals a promising survival benefit for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer; nevertheless, more data remain necessary to identify the best candidates for neoadjuvant regimens.

Sintilimab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy has dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and has been included in first-line treatments. Sintilimab is a domestic anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody in China that has received approvals from the National Medical Products Administration to treat classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and squamous and non-squamous NSCLC. In a prospective clinical study we led, neoadjuvant sintilimab has led to major and complete pathologic responses, which are recommended as surrogate endpoints for neoadjuvant immunotherapy; however, its effect remains inconclusive in pulmonary ground glass nodules. Meanwhile, combination plans seem more likely to be satisfying therapeutic options. Specifically, sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy plans conferred better anti-tumor efficacy and clinical benefits compared to chemotherapy alone, which led to their approval in China and the acceptance of a biological license application in the US. Besides, the combination with other plans, such as docetaxel, cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy, radiation therapy, and anlotinib have also shown promising anti-tumor efficacy, with acceptable toxicities, and are therefore worth further exploration. In addition, several clinical trials on NSCLC at our center are ongoing. In general, sintilimab and its combinatorial plans were effective and well tolerated, but the treatment requires appropriate timing; pathologic responses can be surrogate endpoints for neoadjuvant immunotherapy, while more effective biomarkers are warranted. This study provides an overview of sintilimab-based clinical trials on NSCLC, and may support further investigation of sintilimab in future clinical trials.

The use of oncolytic virotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting

Surgical removal of tumors remains a front-line therapy for many types of cancer. However, this treatment often fails to eradicate disease due to either recurrence of the original tumor or development of distant micrometastases. To address these challenges, patients are often given non-curative treatments presurgery with the intent of improving surgical outcomes. These treatments, collectively known as neoadjuvant therapies, have traditionally focused on the presurgical use of chemotherapeutics. Recently, however, a variety of immunotherapies have also been identified as potentially effective in the neoadjuvant setting. One of these immunotherapies is oncolytic virotherapy, whose clinical use has exploded with the Food and Drug Administration approval of Talimogene Laherparepvec. This review summarizes both the preclinical and clinical literature examining the use of oncolytic virotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for different types of cancers and discusses some of the major questions that still need to be addressed in order for this unique use of immunotherapy to become clinically viable.

Real-world multicentre analysis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy in localized or oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (KOMPASSneoOP)

Background:

Recent clinical trials demonstrate the feasibility of neoadjuvant immuno(chemo)therapy and report high rates of pathological remission, a surrogate marker for overall survival.

Patients and methods:

This is a retrospective multicentre real-world analysis of patients with locally resectable NSCLC, including oligometastatic disease, who received neoadjuvant immuno(chemo)therapy and resection. Consolidating immunotherapy was applied following multidisciplinary board recommendation. Primary endpoint was the rate of complete pathological response (pCR, no residual vital tumour cells) or major pathological response (MPR, ⩽ 10% residual vital tumour cells). Secondary endpoints included the radiological response and survival.

Results:

Seven centres contributed 59 patients (56% stage IIB–IIIC, 44% in stage IVA–IVB with up to four oligometastatic sites). MPR was found in 68% including 53% with pCR. There were no radiological progressions. Median follow-up was 24.3 months. At 12 and 24 months, progression-free survival was 82.6% and 68.1%, and overall survival was 89.5% and 87.2%, respectively.

Conclusion:

To our knowledge, this study encompassed the largest NSCLC real-world cohort treated with neoadjuvant immuno(chemo)therapy to date. In routine clinical practice, resection after neoadjuvant immuno(chemo)therapy is feasible in patients with locally resectable NSCLC, including oligometastatic disease. In line with clinical trials, we found MPR in more than two-thirds of patients. Early data show encouraging survival.

Updated Prognostic Factors in Localized NSCLC

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 80% of lung cancer subtypes. Patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer may be considered for upfront surgical treatment. However, the overall 5-year survival rate is 59%. To improve survival, adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was largely explored and showed an overall benefit of survival at 5 years < 7%. The evaluation of recurrence risk and subsequent need for ACT is only based on tumor stage (TNM classification); however, more than 25% of patients with stage IA/B tumors will relapse. Recently, adjuvant targeted therapy has been approved for EGFR-mutated resected NSCLC and trials are evaluating other targeted therapies and immunotherapies in adjuvant settings. Costs, treatment duration, emergence of resistant clones and side effects stress the need for a better selection of patients. The identification and validation of prognostic and theranostic markers to better stratify patients who could benefit from adjuvant therapies are needed. In this review, we report current validated clinical, pathological and molecular prognosis biomarkers that influence outcome in resected NSCLC, and we also describe molecular biomarkers under evaluation that could be available in daily practice to drive ACT in resected NSCLC.

The Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The management of Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is complex and requires multidisciplinary input. Since the publication of the PACIFIC trial (consolidative durvalumab post concurrent chemotherapy and radiation in Stage III disease) which showed improved survival for patients in the immunotherapy arm, there has been much interest in the use of immunotherapy in the Stage III setting. In this review, we explore the biologic and clinical rationale for the use of immunotherapy in Stage III NSCLC, present previously published and upcoming data in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and concurrent realms of Stage III management, and discuss unanswered questions and challenges moving forward.

Pathologic responses in oligometastatic NSCLC patients treated with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade with and without chemotherapy followed by surgery

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have significantly improved outcome of patients with advanced NSCLC and recently also showed benefit in early-stage disease. Patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) harbor limited metastases, resectable primary tumors and derive benefit from treatment with multimodal locally ablative and systemic therapy approaches. Nothing is known about feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant ICI in this setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We here provide data from a multicenter retrospective study comprising 13 patients with NSCLC and OMD (≤3 distant metastases) from 5 university medical centers in Germany who have been treated with neoadjuvant ICI alone (n = 4) or in combination with chemotherapy (CT) (n = 9) prior to resection of the primary tumor. We analyzed complete (pCR) and major pathological remission (MPR) rates.

RESULTS

These data show that neoadjuvant immunotherapy applied mostly in combination with CT results in high rates of pCR and MPR (54 and 69%, respectively). Up to now, 85% of patients are free of progression with a median follow-up of 9 months (3-28 months). Single cell RNASeq analysis of tumor tissue from one patient treated with CT-ICI indicates a strong predominance of adaptive immune cell populations over a small minority of epithelial (tumor) cells.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant ICI with or without CT is a promising therapeutic concept in patients with OMD.

Mining the Gut Microbiota for Microbial-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Cancer Immunotherapy

The past two decades witnessed a revolution in our understanding of host–microbiota interactions that led to the concept of the super-organism consisting of a eukaryotic part and a prokaryotic part. Owing to the critical role of gut microbiota in modulating the host immune system, it is not beyond all expectations that more and more evidence indicated that the shift of gut microbiota influenced responses to numerous forms of cancer immunotherapy. Therapy targeting gut microbiota is becoming a promising strategy to improve cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the role of the gut microbiota in response to cancer immunotherapy, the mechanisms that the gut microbiota influences cancer immunotherapy, and therapeutic strategies targeting gut microbiota to improve cancer immunotherapy.