1
|
Van Werkhoven LA, Cammareri E, Hoogeman MS, Nout RA, Milder MTW, Nuyttens JJME. Stereotactic body radiation therapy on abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases: a systematic review on toxicity. Acta Oncol 2024; 63:822-832. [PMID: 39473177 PMCID: PMC11541805 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.40681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 10/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To review available data on toxicity during and/or after treatment of abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases (A-P LN) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to provide an overview of adverse events and its relation to dose or fractionation. MATERIAL AND METHODS For this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAH for studies published between the database inception and October 3rd, 2023. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with 1-5 A-P LN oligometastases, (2) treatment with SBRT to a median prescribed dose of ≥55 Gy BED10, and (3) description of acute and/or late toxicity. There were no language or date restrictions. RESULTS A total of 35 studies, including 1,512 patients, were selected. Late grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 0.6% and 0.1% of the patients treated for A-P LN oligometastases. All late adverse events grade ≥ 3 occurred after treatment of the tumor with a minimum BED10 of 72 Gy. Of the 11 patients with severe late toxicity, five patients were re-irradiated. Late grade 2 and 1 toxicity was reported in 3.4% and 8.3% of the patients. Acute toxicity grades 4, 3, 2, and 1 occurred in 0.1%, 0.2%, 4.4%, and 19.8% of the patients, respectively. INTERPRETATION SBRT for A-P LN oligometastases show low toxicity rates. Nearly 50% of late adverse events ≥ grade 3 were associated with re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A Van Werkhoven
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands.
| | - Eugenio Cammareri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mischa S Hoogeman
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike T W Milder
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gueiderikh A, Baude J, Baron D, Schiappa R, Katsahian S, Moreau D, Laurans M, Bibault JE, Kreps S, Bondiau PY, Quivrin M, Lépinoy A, Pasquier D, Hannoun-Levi JM, Giraud P. Nodal radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma recurrence: predictive factors for efficacy. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1468248. [PMID: 39525616 PMCID: PMC11543566 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1468248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Nodes are the second site for prostate cancer recurrence. Whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) has shown superiority over nodal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in two retrospective cohorts. We aimed to compare both modalities and assess factors associated with treatment outcomes. Materials and methods This retrospective multicentric cohort study included patients from five institutions spanning from 2010 to 2022. Patients had a history of prostatic adenocarcinoma classified as N0 M0 at diagnosis with a first nodal-only pelvic castration-sensitive recurrence. Failure-free survival (FFS) was defined as the time from the end of RT to the first failure event-biochemical or imaging recurrence, or death. Results A total of 147 patients (pts) were analyzed, mainly treated for a recurrence after initial prostatectomy (87%), with 64 (43.5%) undergoing SBRT and 83 (56.5%) undergoing WPRT. SBRT was chosen mainly for dosimetric constraints (67%) and was associated with a lower rate of concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prescription. With a median follow-up of 68 months [inter-quartile range (IQR) = 51], FFS was significantly lower in the SBRT group (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, WPRT and ADT were associated with a longer FFS. Factors associated with a longer FFS after SBRT included associated ADT, lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, a PSA doubling time >6 months, and a Gleason score <8. SBRT was associated with a lower rate of genitourinary and gastrointestinal grade ≥2 complications. Discussion For an isolated pelvic nodal prostate cancer recurrence, SBRT is associated with a shorter FFS compared to WPRT. SBRT is often more convenient for patients and leaves further pelvic salvage options available, so it can be explored as an option for well-informed patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gueiderikh
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Jérémy Baude
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - David Baron
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- Epidemiology, Biostatistic and Health Data Department, University Cote d’Azur, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Sandrine Katsahian
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) Centre, Paris, France
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre d’Investigation Clinique 1418 (CIC1418) Épidémiologie Clinique, Paris, France
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR_S 1138 équipe 22, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France
| | - Damien Moreau
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | - Marc Laurans
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Bibault
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Kreps
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Magali Quivrin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Alexis Lépinoy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre O. Lambret, Lille, France
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, UMR 9189 - CRIStAL, Lille, France
| | | | - Philippe Giraud
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lancia A, Ingrosso G, Detti B, Festa E, Bonzano E, Linguanti F, Camilli F, Bertini N, La Mattina S, Orsatti C, Francolini G, Abenavoli EM, Livi L, Aristei C, de Jong D, Al Feghali KA, Siva S, Becherini C. Biology-guided radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer: time to push the envelope? Front Oncol 2024; 14:1455428. [PMID: 39314633 PMCID: PMC11417306 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1455428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer has undergone a profound revolution in recent years. In addition to the introduction of novel molecules in the clinics, the field has witnessed a tremendous development of functional imaging modalities adding new biological insights which can ultimately inform tailored treatment strategies, including local therapies. The evolution and rise of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) have been particularly notable in patients with oligometastatic disease, where it has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective treatment strategy yielding favorable results in terms of disease control and improved oncological outcomes. The possibility of debulking all sites of disease, matched with the ambition of potentially extending this treatment paradigm to polymetastatic patients in the not-too-distant future, makes Biology-guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) an attractive paradigm which can be used in conjunction with systemic therapy in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Matteo Hospital Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiotherapy Unit Prato, Usl Centro Toscana, Presidio Villa Fiorita, Prato, Italy
| | - Eleonora Festa
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Bonzano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Matteo Hospital Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Federico Camilli
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bertini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Salvatore La Mattina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Matteo Hospital Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Pavia, Italy
| | - Carolina Orsatti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Dorine de Jong
- Medical Affairs, RefleXion Medical, Inc., Hayward, CA, United States
| | | | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Macchia G, Pezzulla D, Campitelli M, Laliscia C, Fodor A, Bonome P, Draghini L, Ippolito E, De Sanctis V, Ferioli M, Titone F, Balcet V, Di Cataldo V, Russo D, Vicenzi L, Cossa S, Lucci S, Cilla S, Deodato F, Gambacorta MA, Scambia G, Morganti AG, Ferrandina G. Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Uterine Cancer (MITO-RT2/RAD): A Large, Real-World Study in Collaboration With Italian Association of Radiation Oncology, Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer, and Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group Groups. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:321-332. [PMID: 37150261 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This retrospective, multicenter study analyzes the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy in a large cohort of patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent uterine cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Clinical and radiation therapy data from several radiation therapy centers treating patients by stereotactic body radiation therapy between March 2006 and October 2021 were collected. Objective response rate was defined as complete and partial response, and clinical benefit included objective response rate plus stable disease. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scales were used to grade toxicities. Primary endpoints were the rate of complete response to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and the 2-year actuarial local control rate "per-lesion" basis. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival, as well as toxicity. RESULTS In the study, 157 patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent uterine cancer bearing 272 lesions treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy at 14 centers were analyzed. Lymph node metastases (137, 50.4%) were prevalent, followed by parenchyma lesions (135, 49.6%). Median total dose was 35 Gy (10-75.2), in 5 fractions (range, 1-10). Complete and partial responses were 174 (64.0%), and 54 (19.9%), respectively. Stable disease was registered in 29 (10.6%), and 15 (5.5%) lesions progressed. Type of lesion (lymph node), volume (≤13.7 cc) and total dose (BED10 >59.5 Gy) were significantly associated with a higher probability of achieving complete response. Patients achieving complete response (CR) "per-lesion" basis experienced a 2-year actuarial local control rate of 92.4% versus 33.5% in lesions not achieving complete response (NCR; P < .001). Moreover, the 2-year actuarial progression-free survival rate in patients with CR was 45.4%, and patients with NCR had a 2-year rate of 17.6% (P < .001). Finally, patients who had a CR had a 2-year overall survival rate of 82.7%, compared with 56.5% for NCR patients (P <.001). Severe acute toxicity was around 2%, including one toxic death due to gastric perforation, and severe late toxicity around 4%. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy in this setting was confirmed. The low toxicity profile and the high local control rate in complete responder patients encourage the wider use of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Maura Campitelli
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Concetta Laliscia
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrei Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonome
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | | | - Edy Ippolito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Roma, Italy
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Radiotherapy Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, S. Andrea Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Martina Ferioli
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum. Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Titone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Vittoria Balcet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedale degli Infermi, Biella
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Lisa Vicenzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Sabrina Cossa
- UOC Radioterapia, Fondazione "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza," IRCCS, S. Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Simona Lucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise, Campobasso, Molise, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy; Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum. Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Goyal S, Periasamy K, Madan R, Vias P, Chandran V. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for oligometastatic inguinal lymph node in castrate resistant prostate cancer. Asian J Urol 2023; 10:109-112. [PMID: 36721692 PMCID: PMC9875146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
|
6
|
Zamagni A, Bonetti M, Buwenge M, Macchia G, Deodato F, Cilla S, Galietta E, Strigari L, Cellini F, Tagliaferri L, Cammelli S, Morganti AG. Stereotactic radiotherapy of nodal oligometastases from prostate cancer: a prisma-compliant systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:845-863. [PMID: 35980556 PMCID: PMC9637632 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10183-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, metastases-directed therapies can delay the initiation or switch of systemic treatments and allow local control (LC) and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in patients with lymph nodes (LN) oligometastases. We performed a systematic review on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in this setting. Papers reporting LC and/or PFS were selected. Data on ADT-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity were also collected from the selected studies. Fifteen studies were eligible (414 patients), 14 of them were retrospective analyses. A high heterogeneity was observed in terms of patient selection and treatment. In one study SBRT was delivered as a single 20 Gy fraction, while in the others the median total dose ranged between 24 and 40 Gy delivered in 3-6 fractions. LC and PFS were reported in 15 and 12 papers, respectively. LC was reported as a crude percentage in 13 studies, with 100% rate in seven and 63.2-98.0% in six reports. Five studies reported actuarial LC (2-year LC: 70.0-100%). PFS was reported as a crude rate in 11 studies (range 27.3-68.8%). Actuarial 2-year PFS was reported in four studies (range 30.0-50.0%). SBRT tolerability was excellent, with only two patients with grade 3 acute toxicity and two patients with grade 3 late toxicity. SBRT for LN oligorecurrences from PCa in safe and provides optimal LC. However, the long-term effect on PFS and OS is still unclear as well as which patients are the best candidate for this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Zamagni
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Mattia Bonetti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Erika Galietta
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ingrosso G, Bottero M, Becherini C, Caini S, Alì E, Lancia A, Ost P, Sanguineti G, Siva S, Zilli T, Francolini G, Bellavita R, Aristei C, Livi L, Detti B. A systematic review and meta-analysis on non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: The radiation oncologist's perspective. Semin Oncol 2022; 49:409-418. [PMID: 36192243 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality in men. In patients undergoing a failure after radical treatment, one of the therapeutic option is androgen deprivation: despite initial response rates, a progression to a state of castration resistance is observed in most of the patients. In the present article, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all clinical trials assessing treatment for nmCRPC with next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors. We performed a review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials comparing new agents (apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide) with placebo as control arm, in the setting of nmCRPC. Patients treated with next-generation ARIs had a 26% reduction in the risk of death compared with placebo; compared with other ARIs, darolutamide had the lowest rate of grade 3 and 4 AEs and the lowest therapy discontinuation rate due to any grade AEs. This meta-analysis shows that treatment with new ARIs is safe and significantly reduces the risk of death and of metastasis onset in nmCRPC patients. Under way studies on new biomarkers such as genomic classifiers will probably allow the stratification in more specific subsets of disease. New imaging modalities such as PSMA-PET have shown greater sensibility and specificity than conventional imaging in metastases detection. All patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion, with a total of 2,694 who underwent next-generation ARIs (806 apalutamide, 955 darolutamide, 933 enzalutamide) and 1,423 in the placebo arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Marta Bottero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention, and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Emanuele Alì
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology Department. Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rita Bellavita
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shen J, Tao Y, He L, Guan H, Zhen H, Liu Z, Zhang F. Clinical application of radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic ovarian cancer: a sharp tool to prolong the interval of systemic treatment. Discov Oncol 2022; 13:82. [PMID: 36006491 PMCID: PMC9411494 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00540-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the advances of radiation technology, treatment of oligometastatic disease, with limited metastatic burden, have more chances to achieve long-term local control. Here we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT) in oligometastatic ovarian cancer patients. METHODS A retrospective analysis collecting 142 patients (189 lesions) with oligometastatic ovarian cancer were included in the study. All pateints received radiotherapy and the curative effect and response rate were evaluated by diagnostic imaging after 1-3 months of radiotherapy with RECIST. Endpoints were the rate of complete response (CR), chemotherapy-free interval (CFI), local control (LC) rate and overall survival (OS) rate. Toxicity was evaluated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). Logistic and Cox regression were used for the uni- and multivariate analysis of factors influencing survival outcomes. RESULTS From 2013.1.1 to 2020.12.30, a total of 142 ovarian cancer patients (189 oligometastasis lesions) were included in the analysis. Prescribed doses to an average GTV of 3.10 cm were 1.8-8 Gy/fraction, median BED (28-115, a/b = 10 Gy), 5-28 fractions. For 179 evaluable lesions, the cases of CR, partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) after radiotherapy were 22,39,38 and 80 respectively. The disease control rate (DCR): CR + PR + SD was 55.31%, and the objective response rate (ORR): CR + PR was 34.08%. No patient developed grade 3 or higher side effect. The median CFI was 14 months (1-99 months), and the LC rate was 69.7%, 54.3% and 40.9% in 1 year, 2 years and 5 years respectively. GTV < 3 cm before treatment, platinum sensitivity, time from the last treatment ≥ 6 months, single lesion and BED(a/b = 10 Gy) ≥ 60 are the factors of good LC (p < 0.05). The total OS of 1 year, 2 years and 5 years were 67.1%, 52.6% and 30.3%, respectively. Single lesion (HR 0.598, 95%CI 0.405-0.884), DCR (HR 0.640, 95% CI 0.448-0.918) and ORR(HR 0.466, 95% CI 0.308-0.707) were the significant factors influencing 5-year OS. CONCLUSION For patients with oligometastatic ovarian cancer, radiotherapy has high LC, long chemotherapy-free interval, and survival benefits. Subgroup analysis shows that patients with single lesion and good local treatment results have higher overall survival rate, suggesting that active treatment is also beneficial for oligometastatic ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730 People’s Republic of China
| | - Yinjie Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730 People’s Republic of China
| | - Lei He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730 People’s Republic of China
| | - Hui Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730 People’s Republic of China
| | - Hongnan Zhen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730 People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhikai Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730 People’s Republic of China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730 People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Macchia G, Nardangeli A, Laliscia C, Fodor A, Draghini L, Gentile PC, D'Agostino GR, Balcet V, Bonome P, Ferioli M, Autorino R, Vicenzi L, Raguso A, Borghesi S, Ippolito E, Di Cataldo V, Cilla S, Perrucci E, Campitelli M, Gambacorta MA, Deodato F, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic cervical cancer (MITO-RT2/RAD study): a collaboration of MITO, AIRO GYN, and MaNGO groups. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:732-739. [PMID: 35193941 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This retrospective, multicenter study analyzes the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy in a large cohort of patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS A standardized data collection from several radiotherapy centers that treated patients by stereotactic body radiotherapy between March 2006 and February 2021 was set up. Clinical and stereotactic body radiotherapy parameters were collected. Objective response rate was defined as a composite of complete and partial response, while clinical benefit included objective response rate plus stable disease. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scales were used to grade toxicities. The primary endpoints were the rate of complete response to stereotactic body radiotherapy, and the 2 year actuarial local control rate on a 'per lesion' basis. The secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival, as well as toxicity. RESULTS A total of 83 patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer bearing 125 lesions treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy at 15 different centers were selected for analysis. Of the sites of metastatic disease, lymph node metastases were most common (55.2%), followed by parenchyma lesions (44.8%). Median total dose was 35 Gy (range 10-60), in five fractions (range 1-10), with a median dose/fraction of 7 Gy (range 4-26). Complete, partial, and stable response were found in 73 (58.4%), 29 (23.2%), and 16 (12.8%) lesions, respectively, reaching 94.4% of the clinical benefit rate. Forty-six (55.4%) patients had a complete response. Patients achieving complete response on a 'per lesion' basis experienced a 2 year actuarial local control rate of 89.0% versus 22.1% in lesions not achieving complete response (p<0.001). The 2 year actuarial progression-free survival rate was 42.5% in patients with complete response versus 7.8% in patients with partial response or stable or progressive disease (p=0.001). The 2 year actuarial overall survival rate was 68.9% in patients with complete response versus 44.3% in patients with partial response or stable or progressive disease (p=0.015). Fifteen patients (18.1%) had mild acute toxicity, totaling 29 side events. Late toxicity was documented in four patients (4.8%) totaling seven adverse events. CONCLUSION Our analysis confirmed the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer patients. The low toxicity profile encourages the wider use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessia Nardangeli
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Concetta Laliscia
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrei Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Pier Carlo Gentile
- Radiation Oncology Unit, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center San Pietro FBF, Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Roberto D'Agostino
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radiosurgery Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCSS Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Vittoria Balcet
- UOC Radioterapia, Nuovo Ospedale degli Infermi, Biella, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonome
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise, Campobasso, Molise, Italy
| | - Martina Ferioli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rosa Autorino
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Lisa Vicenzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Arcangela Raguso
- UOC Radioterapia, Fondazione "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", IRCCS, S. Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana sud est, Arezzo, Toscana, Italy
| | - Edy Ippolito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Roma, Italy
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise, Campobasso, Molise, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Perrucci
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Maura Campitelli
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia, Oncologia ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise, Campobasso, Molise, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stratification of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Patients by Liquid Biopsy: Clinical Insights from a Pilot Study. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10061321. [PMID: 35740343 PMCID: PMC9219949 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We propose a pilot, prospective, translational study with the aim of identifying possible molecular markers underlying metastatic prostate cancer (PC) evolution with the use of liquid biopsy. Twenty-eight castrate sensitive, oligometastatic PC patients undergoing bone and/or nodal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were recruited. Peripheral blood samples were collected before the commencement of SBRT, then they were processed for circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) extraction. Deep targeted sequencing was performed using a custom gene panel. The primary endpoint was to identify differences in the molecular contribution between the oligometastatic and polymetastatic evolution of PC to same-first oligo-recurrent disease presentation. Seventy-seven mutations were detected in 25/28 cfDNA samples: ATM in 14 (50%) cases, BRCA2 11 (39%), BRCA1 6 (21%), AR 13 (46%), ETV4, and ETV6 2 (7%). SBRT failure was associated with an increased risk of harboring the BRCA1 mutation (OR 10.5) (p = 0.043). The median cfDNA concentration was 24.02 ng/mL for ATM mutation carriers vs. 40.04 ng/mL for non-carriers (p = 0.039). Real-time molecular characterization of oligometastatic PC may allow for the identification of a true oligometastatic phenotype, with a stable disease over a long time being more likely to benefit from local, curative treatments or the achievement of long-term disease control. A prospective validation of our promising findings is desirable for a better understanding of the real impact of liquid biopsy in detecting tumor aggressiveness and clonal evolution.
Collapse
|
11
|
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Oligorecurrent/Oligoprogressive Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112680. [PMID: 35681659 PMCID: PMC9179886 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This paper is a review of the literature on oligorecurrent/oligoprogressive mediastinal and hilar lymph node metastasis treated with SBRT. The use of mediastinal SBRT had historically been not feasible in view of the expected toxicity due to the proximity of critical structures such as the airways and esophagus. Despite the heterogeneity and lack of some data in the studies analyzed, this literature review is the first published and can be a valid guide for the radiotherapist in the management of oligometastatic/oligoprogressive patients, with particular regard to the radiotherapy doses, dose constraints for organs at risk, and clinical outcomes. Abstract Introduction: Mediastinal or hilar lymph node metastases are a challenging condition in patients affected by solid tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could play a crucial role in the therapeutic management and in the so-called “no-fly zone”, delivering high doses of radiation in relatively few treatment fractions with excellent sparing of healthy surrounding tissues and low toxicity. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of SBRT in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lesions with particular regard to the radiotherapy doses, dose constraints for organs at risk, and clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: Two blinded investigators performed a critical review of the Medline, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA), starting from a specific question: What is the clinical impact of SBRT for the treatment of oligorecurrent/oligoprogressive mediastinal and hilar metastasis? All retrospective and prospective clinical trials published in English up to February 2022 were analyzed. Results: A total of 552 articles were identified and 12 of them were selected with a total number of 478 patients treated with SBRT for mediastinal or hilar node recurrence. All the studies are retrospective, published between 2015 and 2021 with a median follow-up ranging from 12 to 42.2 months. Studies following SBRT for lung lesions or retreatments after thorax radiotherapy for stage III lung cancer were also included. The studies showed extensive heterogeneity in terms of patient and treatment characteristics. Non-small cell lung cancer was the most frequently reported histology. Different dose schemes were used, with a higher prevalence of 4–8 Gy in 5 or 6 fractions, but dose escalation was also used up to 52 Gy in 4 fractions with dose constraints mainly derived from RTOG 0813 trial. The radiotherapy technique most frequently used was volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a median PTV volume ranging from 7 to 25.7 cc. The clinical outcome seems to be very encouraging with 1-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 84 to 94%, 53 to 88% and 23 to 53.9%, respectively. Half of the studies did not report toxicity greater than G3 and only five cases of fatal toxicity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: From the present review, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions because of the heterogeneity of the studies analyzed. However, SBRT appears to be a safe and effective option in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lymph node recurrence, with a good toxicity profile. Its use in clinical practice is still limited, and there is extensive heterogeneity in patient selection and fractionation schedules. Good performance status, small PTV volume, absence of previous thoracic irradiation, and administration of a high biologically effective dose (BED) seem to be factors that correlate with greater local control and better survival rates. In the presence of symptoms related to the thoracic lymph nodes, SBRT determines a rapid control that lasts over time. We look forward to the prospective studies that are underway for definitive conclusions.
Collapse
|
12
|
de Pablos-Rodríguez P, la Rosa A, Rebez G, Mascarós Martínez JM, González Pérez V, Arribas Alpuente L, Rubio-Briones J, Ramírez-Backhaus M. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metachronous oligorecurrent prostate cancer: A single-center experience. ACTAS UROLÓGICAS ESPAÑOLAS (ENGLISH EDITION) 2022; 46:238-244. [PMID: 35321821 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Metachronous oligorecurrence in prostate cancer (PCa) occurs in patients with localized disease who, after failed radical treatment, develop oligometastases. Metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) aims to delay androgen deprivation therapy. In this study, we report our experience to elucidate the role of SBRT in a selected population of patients with metachronous oligorecurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of patients treated with SBRT for oligorecurrent PCa between November 2015 and December 2020. We detailed clinicopathological characteristics at disease onset (age, PSA, stage, primary treatment), clinical scenario at diagnosis of oligorecurrence (PSA, PSA velocity, metastases characteristics), progression-free survival, castration resistance-free survival, dose, and toxicity of SBRT. RESULTS Thirty-eight SBRT treatments were applied to 13 lymph node and 25 bone metastases in a total of 28 patients. After a follow-up of 34.57 months (21.17-57.59), 17 patients had radiological progression of the disease and 11 presented castration resistant PCa. PFS and CRFS were 21.93 and 44.13 months, respectively. Only 2 patients presented grade 1 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS In patients with metachronous oligorecurrent PCa, SBRT constitutes a safe and effective treatment that allows delaying the onset of androgen deprivation therapy and the time to castration resistance, assuming low levels of toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P de Pablos-Rodríguez
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain.
| | - A la Rosa
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - G Rebez
- Department of Urology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - V González Pérez
- Servicio de Radiofísica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Arribas Alpuente
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Rubio-Briones
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Ramírez-Backhaus
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cheng Y, Lin Y, Long Y, Du L, Chen R, Hu T, Guo Q, Liao G, Huang J. Is the CyberKnife © radiosurgery system effective and safe for patients? An umbrella review of the evidence. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1777-1791. [PMID: 35137603 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The CyberKnife© system combines real-time image guidance and a dynamic tracking system to implement frameless radiotherapy. This umbrella review is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CyberKnife. Methods: A comprehensive search of health technology assessments and systematic reviews was performed among the Embase, PubMed and other grey databases until July 2020. Treatment outcomes were extracted, and the quality of included studies were assessed using AMSTAR-2. Results: Nineteen studies were eligible. CyberKnife not only had a wide range of applications, long overall survival and great local control, but also had a limited toxicity and good cost-effectiveness compared with other radiotherapy equipment. Conclusion: Despite the relatively low quality of the evidence, our findings can still provide a decision reference for policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Cheng
- Medical Device Regulatory Research & Evaluation Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Yifei Lin
- Medical Device Regulatory Research & Evaluation Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
- Precision Medicine Research Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Youlin Long
- Medical Device Regulatory Research & Evaluation Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Liang Du
- Medical Device Regulatory Research & Evaluation Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Rui Chen
- School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Tengyue Hu
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Qiong Guo
- Medical Device Regulatory Research & Evaluation Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Ga Liao
- State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Centre for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
- Medical Big Data Centre, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
- Department of Information Management, Department of Stomatology Informatics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Jin Huang
- Medical Device Regulatory Research & Evaluation Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Detti B, Zilli T, Ingrosso G, Ribeiro I, Lancia A. Editorial: Interaction Between Modern Radiotherapy and Novel Drugs in Prostate Cancer: Future Perspectives. Front Oncol 2022; 12:876318. [PMID: 35433471 PMCID: PMC9005631 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.876318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Detti
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Firenze, Italy
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ivone Ribeiro
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Radiation Oncology, San Matteo Hospital Foundation (IRCCS) Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pasqualetti F, Trippa F, Aristei C, Borghesi S, Colosimo C, Cantarella M, Mazzola R, Ingrosso G. Stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastases in the lymph nodes. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:46-51. [PMID: 35402021 PMCID: PMC8989441 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Even though systemic therapy is standard treatment for lymph node metastases, metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) seems to be a valid option in oligometastatic patients with a low disease burden. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT ) is the gold standard for assessing metastases to the lymph nodes; co-registration of PET-CT images and planning CT images are the basis for gross tumor volume (GTV ) delineation. Appropriate techniques are needed to overcome target motion. SRT schedules depend on the irradiation site, target volume and dose constraints to the organs at risk (OARs) of toxicity. Although several fractionation schemes were reported, total doses of 48–60 Gy in 4–8 fractions were proposed for mediastinal lymph node SRT, with the spinal cord, esophagus, heart and proximal bronchial tree being the dose limiting OAR s. Total doses ranged from 30 to 45 Gy, with daily fractions of 7–12 Gy for abdominal lymph nodes, with dose limiting OARs being the liver, kidneys, bowel and bladder. SRT on lymph node metastases is safe; late side effects, particularly severe, are rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pasqualetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Trippa
- Radiation Oncology Centre, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | - Caterina Colosimo
- Operative Unit of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | | | - Rosario Mazzola
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cellini F, Tagliaferri L, Frascino V, Alitto AR, Fionda B, Boldrini L, Romano A, Casà C, Catucci F, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V. Radiation therapy for prostate cancer: What's the best in 2021. Urologia 2022; 89:5-15. [PMID: 34496707 DOI: 10.1177/03915603211042335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is highly involved in the management of prostate cancer. Its features and potential applications experienced a radical evolution over last decades, as they are associated to the continuous evolution of available technology and current oncological innovations. Some application of radiotherapy like brachytherapy have been recently enriched by innovative features and multidisciplinary dedications. In this report we aim to put some questions regarding the following issues regarding multiple aspects of modern application of radiation oncology: the current application of radiation oncology; the modern role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for both the management of primary lesions and for lymph-nodal recurrence; the management of the oligometastatic presentations; the role of brachytherapy; the aid played by the application of the organ at risk spacer (spacer OAR), fiducial markers, electromagnetic tracking systems and on-line Magnetic Resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), and the role of the new opportunity represented by radiomic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cellini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Frascino
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Alitto
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Pablos-Rodríguez P, la Rosa de los Ríos A, Rebez G, Mascarós Martínez J, González Pérez V, Arribas Alpuente L, Rubio-Briones J, Ramírez-Backhaus M. Terapia de radiación corporal estereotáctica en pacientes con cáncer de próstata oligorrecurrente metacrónico. Experiencia de un centro. Actas Urol Esp 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
18
|
Cozzi S, Botti A, Timon G, Blandino G, Najafi M, Manicone M, Bardoscia L, Ruggieri MP, Ciammella P, Iotti C. Prognostic factors, efficacy, and toxicity of involved-node stereotactic body radiation therapy for lymph node oligorecurrent prostate cancer : An investigation of 117 pelvic lymph nodes. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:700-709. [PMID: 34757443 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01871-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal radiotherapy regimen is not yet defined in the setting of oligorecurrent prostate cancer (oligorPC). There is evidence of high variability in treatment protocols among different centers worldwide, and no international consensus guidelines on treatment volumes, radiation schedules, and techniques. The purpose of the present retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of involved-pelvic-node stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligorPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with pelvic node oligorPC following primary surgery, radical radiotherapy, or salvage radiotherapy for biochemical or local relapse of prostate cancer who underwent involved-node SBRT with biological effective dose (BED) > 100 Gy, with or without concurrent and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), were retrospectively evaluated. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), overall survival (OS), possible prognostic factors, and toxicity outcomes were investigated. RESULTS From November 2012 to December 2019, 74 patients fitted the selection criteria. A total of 117 lesions were treated. Median follow-up was 31 months (range 6-89). Concurrent ADT was administered in 58.1% of patients. The 1‑year, 2‑year, and 3‑year DPFS was 77%, 37%, and 19%, respectively; the 1‑year, 2‑year, and 3‑year OS was 98%, 98%, and 95%, respectively. The presence of a single target lesion was associated with a statistically significant impact on OS. No in-field recurrence occurred. Patients who reached early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir (< 3 months after SBRT) had a lower 3‑year survival (p = 0.004). The value of PSA nadir after SBRT and the time between primary treatment and SBRT had an impact on bPFS. Concomitant ADT was associated with improved DPFS. No acute or early late (> 6 months) genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events of any grade were reported, albeit with relatively short median follow-up. CONCLUSION SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for oligorPC, with a 100% local control rate in our series. It is not possible to clearly assess the opportunity to postpone ADT prescription in patients with two or more nodal metastases. The number of secondary lesions, time-to-nadir PSA, PSA nadir value, and the time interval between primary treatment and SBRT were identified as prognostic factors. Future prospective randomized studies are desirable to better understand the still open questions regarding the oligorecurrent prostate cancer state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giorgia Timon
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Gladys Blandino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Masoumeh Najafi
- Department of Radiation Oncology Shohadaye Haft-e-Tir Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Teheran, Iran
| | - Moana Manicone
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lilia Bardoscia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, S. Luca Hospital, Healtcare Company Tuscany Nord Ovest, Lucca, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Ruggieri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy of lymph node metastases under MR-guidance: First clinical results and patient-reported outcomes. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:56-65. [PMID: 34468783 PMCID: PMC8760210 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01834-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Objective Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a noninvasive treatment option for lymph node metastases (LNM). Magnetic resonance (MR)-guidance offers superior tissue contrast and enables treatment of targets in close vicinity to radiosensitive organs at risk (OAR). However, literature on MR-guided SBRT of LNM is scarce with no report on outcome parameters. Materials and methods We report a subgroup analysis of a prospective observational study comprising patients with LNM. Patients received MR-guided SBRT at our MRIdian Linac (ViewRay Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) between January 2019 and February 2020. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method with log rank test to test for significance (p < 0.05). Our patient-reported outcome questionnaire was utilized to evaluate patients’ perspective. The CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v. 5.0 was used to describe toxicity. Results Twenty-nine patients (72.4% with prostate cancer; 51.7% with no distant metastases) received MR-guided SBRT for in total 39 LNM. Median dose was 27 Gy in three fractions, prescribed to the 80% isodose. At 1‑year, estimated LC, PFS and OS were 92.6, 67.4 and 100.0%. Compared to baseline, six patients (20.7%) developed new grade I toxicities (mainly fatigue). One grade II toxicity occurred (fatigue), with no adverse event grade ≥III. Overall treatment experience was rated particularly positive, while the technically required low room temperature still represents the greatest obstacle in the pursuit of the ideal patient acceptance. Conclusion MR-guided SBRT of LNM was demonstrated to be a well-accepted treatment modality with excellent preliminary results. Future studies should evaluate the clinical superiority to conventional SBRT. Video online The online version of this article contains one video. The article and the video are available online (10.1007/s00066-021-01834-w). The video can be found in the article back matter as “Supplementary Information”.
Collapse
|
20
|
Poon DMC, Chan CK, Chan TW, Cheung FY, Ho LY, Kwong PWK, Lee EKC, Leung AKC, Leung SYL, So HS, Tam PC, Ma WK. Hong Kong Urological Association-Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology consensus statements on the management of advanced prostate cancer-2019 Updates. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 17 Suppl 3:12-26. [PMID: 33860645 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To update the Hong Kong Urological Association-Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology consensus statements on the management of advanced prostate cancer, the same panelists as in the previous consensus panel held a series of meetings to discuss updated clinical evidence and experiences. METHODS The previous consensus statements were retained, deleted, or revised, and new statements were added. At the final meeting, all statements were reviewed and amended as appropriate, followed by panel voting. RESULTS There were significant changes and additions to the previous consensus statements, primarily driven by the advances in androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, treatment sequencing in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and increasing recognition of oligometastatic prostate cancer since the introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography. In this update, a total of 59 consensus statements were accepted and established. CONCLUSIONS The consensus panel updated consensus statements on the management of advanced prostate cancer, aiming to allow physicians in the region to keep abreast of the recent evidence on optimal clinical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Ming-Chun Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Chi-Kwok Chan
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Tim-Wai Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | | | - Lap-Yin Ho
- Asia Clinic, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | | | - Eric Ka-Chai Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | | | | | - Hing-Shing So
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Po-Chor Tam
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong
| | - Wai-Kit Ma
- Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Valero J, Montero A, Hernando O, Izquierdo M, Sánchez E, García-Aranda M, López M, Ciérvide R, Martí J, Álvarez B, Alonso R, Chen-Zhao X, Fernández-Letón P, Rubio C. Moderate hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiation therapy is feasible and well tolerated: experience from a single tertiary cancer centre. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1452-1462. [PMID: 33433839 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02543-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional post-prostatectomy radiation therapy comprises 6.5-8 weeks of treatment, therefore, hypofractionated and shortened schemes arouse increasing interest. We describe our experience regarding feasibility and clinical outcome of a post-prostatectomy moderate hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy schedule MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Oct 2015-Mar 2020, 113 patients, median age of 62 years-old (range 45-76) and prostate adenocarcinoma of low risk (30%), intermediate risk (49%) and high risk (21%) were included for adjuvant (34%) or salvage radiation therapy (66%) after radical prostatectomy (RP). All patients underwent radiotherapy with image-guided IMRT/VMAT to a total dose of 62.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy/fraction in 25 fractions. Sixteen patients (14%) received concomitant androgen deprivation therapy. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 29 months (range 3-60 months) all patients but three are alive. Eleven patients (10%) developed exclusive biochemical relapse while 19 patients (17%) presented macroscopically visible relapse: prostatectomy bed in two patients (2%), pelvic lymph nodes in 13 patients (11.5%) and distant metastases in four patients (4%). The 3 years actuarial rates for OS, bFRS, and DMFS were 99.1, 91.1 and 91.2%, respectively. Acute and late tolerance was satisfactory. Maximal acute genitourinary (AGU) toxicity was G2 in 8% of patients; maximal acute gastrointestinal (AGI) toxicity was G2 in 3.5% of patients; maximal late genitourinary (LGU) toxicity was G3 in 1% of patients and maximal late gastrointestinal (LGI) toxicity was G2 in 2% of patients. There were no cases of severe acute or late toxicity. No relationship was found between acute or late GI/GU adverse effects and dosimetric parameters, age, presence of comorbidities or concomitant treatments. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated radiotherapy (62.5 Gy in 25 2.5 Gy fractions) is feasible and well tolerated with low complication rates allowing for a moderate dose-escalation that offers encouraging clinical results for biochemical control and survival in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Valero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
| | - O Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Izquierdo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M García-Aranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Martí
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - X Chen-Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - C Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ingrosso G, Mariucci C, Tenti MV, Bini V, Alì E, Saldi S, Palumbo I, Bellavita R, Aristei C. Salvage radiotherapy in patients affected by oligorecurrent pelvic nodal prostate cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 22:2236-2243. [PMID: 32418156 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02364-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is an investigational treatment option in patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this retrospective study is to report oncologic outcome and toxicity of elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) in PCa patients affected by pelvic nodal oligorecurrence. METHODS 41 consecutive patients were treated with salvage radiotherapy. At biochemical recurrence after primary treatment, oligorecurrent disease was detected by positron emission tomography (PET) in 94% of the patients. Image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was delivered using tomotherapy. 83% of the patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with ENRT. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test was used to analyze associations between survival end-points and clinical parameters. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Toxicity was registered according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. RESULTS The median at follow-up was 33.6 months. At 3 years, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS) were 89%, 92%, and 53%, respectively. At univariate analysis, all survival end-points were correlated with the number of positive pelvic lymph nodes at oligorecurrence (≤ 3 vs > 3). Biochemical-PFS was correlated with PSA (p = 0.034) and PSA doubling time (p = 0.004) at oligorecurrence. At multivariate analysis, no independent variable was statistically significant. No patient experienced grade ≥ 2 late toxicity after radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The number of metastatic lymph nodes and PSA doubling time seems to be important prognostic factors in the pelvic oligorecurrent setting. Salvage radiotherapy combined with short-course ADT might be a valid treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - C Mariucci
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - M V Tenti
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - V Bini
- Internal Medicine, Endocrine and Metabolic Science Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - E Alì
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - S Saldi
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - I Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - R Bellavita
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - C Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Slevin F, Beasley M, Cross W, Scarsbrook A, Murray L, Henry A. Patterns of Lymph Node Failure in Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer Postradical Prostatectomy and Implications for Salvage Therapies. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1126-1140. [PMID: 33305073 PMCID: PMC7718540 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is increasing use of radical prostatectomy to treat patients with high-risk prostate cancer. This has contributed toward a pathologic stage migration, and a greater number of patients are subsequently being diagnosed with biochemical failure. There is increasing use of advanced imaging techniques in the setting of biochemical failure, including positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). METHODS AND MATERIALS This critical literature review highlights the evidence for PET-CT in postprostatectomy biochemical failure and identifies sites of pelvic lymph node relapse in the setting of biochemical failure and the potential implications that the locations of these relapses may have for salvage therapies. Potential future directions are then considered. RESULTS The optimal PET-CT tracer remains uncertain but there is increasing use of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT for investigating sites of nodal metastasis at low prostate-specific antigen levels, and this is leading to a blurring of the biochemical and radiologic recurrence phases. The optimal therapeutic approach remains undefined, with current trials investigating postoperative radiation therapy to the whole pelvis in addition to the prostatic fossa, the use of PET-CT in the setting of biochemical recurrence to guide delivery of salvage radiation therapy, and, for patients with node-only relapsed prostate cancer, the addition of whole pelvis radiation therapy to metastasis-directed therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The most appropriate target volume for salvage radiation therapy remains uncertain, and the findings of studies using PET-CT to map nodal recurrences suggest that there could be a role for extending whole pelvis radiation therapy volumes to increase coverage of superior nodal regions. The emerging fields of radiomics and radiogenomics could provide important prognostic information and aid decision making for patients with relapsed prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finbar Slevin
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Beasley
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - William Cross
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Reshko LB, Richardson MK, Spencer K, Kersh CR. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in Pelvic Lymph Node Oligometastases. Cancer Invest 2020; 38:599-607. [PMID: 32715780 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1801713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in achieving durable local control and palliation of pain in pelvic lymph node oligometastatic disease is not well-studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of 30 patients with 43 pelvic lymph node oligometastases from various primary cancers all but one with non-prostate primaries treated at our institution with SBRT. The median follow-up time was 21 months. The median SBRT dose was 24 Gy in four fractions. The one-, two-, and five-year local control was 74%, 71%, and 70% and one-, two-, and five-year overall survival was 70%, 47%, and 31%. Toxicities were mild with no grade 3 or higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonid B Reshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Martin K Richardson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA
| | - Kelly Spencer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA
| | - Charles R Kersh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Winkel D, Werensteijn-Honingh AM, Eppinga WSC, Intven MPW, Hes J, Snoeren LMW, Visser SA, Bol GH, Raaymakers BW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Kroon PS. Dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionation for SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154:243-248. [PMID: 32949691 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE At our department, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using the 1.5T MR-linac system (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) has been initiated for patients with lymph node oligometastases. Superior soft tissue contrast and the possibility for online plan adaptation on the Unity may allow for hypofractionated treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric feasibility and compare the plan quality of different hypofractionated schemes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data was used from 12 patients with single lymph node oligometastases (10 pelvic, 2 para-aortic), which were all treated on the Unity with a prescribed dose of 5x7 Gy to 95% of the PTV. Hypofractionation was investigated for 3x10 Gy and 1x20 Gy schemes (all 60 Gy BED α/β = 10). The pre-treatment plans were evaluated based on dose criteria and plan quality. If all criteria were met, the number of online adapted plans which also met all dose criteria was investigated. For pre-treatment plans meeting the criteria for all three fractionation schemes, the plan quality after online adaptation was compared using the four parameters described in the NRG-BR001 phase 1 trial. RESULTS Pre-treatment plans met all clinical criteria for the three different fractionation schemes in 10, 9 and 6 cases. 50/50, 45/45 17/30 of the corresponding online adapted plans met all criteria, respectively. Violations were primarily caused by surrounding organs at risk overlapping or adjacent to the PTV. The 1x20 Gy treatment plans were, in general, of lesser quality than the 5x7 Gy and 3x10 Gy plans. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated radiotherapy for lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac is feasible based on dose criteria and plan quality metrics. The location of the target relative to critical structures should be considered in choosing the most suitable fractionation scheme. Especially for single fraction treatment, meeting all dose criteria in the pre-treatment situation does not guarantee that this also applies during online treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Winkel
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Wietse S C Eppinga
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jochem Hes
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Louk M W Snoeren
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne A Visser
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gijsbert H Bol
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W Raaymakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Petra S Kroon
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the first clinical 1.5T MR-linac SBRT treatments of lymph node oligometastases compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment. Radiother Oncol 2020; 146:118-125. [PMID: 32146257 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Patients were treated at our institute for single and multiple lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac since August 2018. The superior soft-tissue contrast and additional software features of the MR-linac compared to CBCT-linacs allow for online adaptive treatment planning. The purpose of this study was to perform a target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the clinically delivered online adaptive radiotherapy treatment compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient data was used from 14 patients with single lymph node oligometastases and 6 patients with multiple (2-3) metastases. All patients were treated on the 1.5T MR-linac with a prescribed dose of 5 × 7 Gy to 95% of the PTV and a CBCT-linac plan was created for each patient. The difference in target coverage between these plans was compared and plans were evaluated based on dose criteria for each fraction after calculating the CBCT-plan on the daily anatomy. The GTV coverage was evaluated based on the online planning and the post-delivery MRI. RESULTS For both single and multiple lymph node oligometastases the GTV V35Gy had a median value of 100% for both the MR-linac plans and CBCT-plans pre- and post-delivery and did not significantly differ. The percentage of plans that met all dose constraints was improved from 19% to 84% and 20% to 67% for single and multiple lymph node cases, respectively. CONCLUSION Target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the first clinical 1.5T MR-linac SBRT treatments of lymph node oligometastases compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment shows a smaller amount of unplanned violations of high dose criteria. The GTV coverage was comparable. Benefit is primarily gained in patients treated for multiple lymph node oligometastases: geometrical deformations are accounted for, dose can be delivered in one plan and margins can be reduced.
Collapse
|
27
|
Macchia G, Lazzari R, Colombo N, Laliscia C, Capelli G, D'Agostino GR, Deodato F, Maranzano E, Ippolito E, Ronchi S, Paiar F, Scorsetti M, Cilla S, Ingargiola R, Huscher A, Cerrotta AM, Fodor A, Vicenzi L, Russo D, Borghesi S, Perrucci E, Pignata S, Aristei C, Morganti AG, Scambia G, Valentini V, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Ferrandina G. A Large, Multicenter, Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Oligometastatic Ovarian Cancer (MITO RT1 Study): A Collaboration of MITO, AIRO GYN, and MaNGO Groups. Oncologist 2019; 25:e311-e320. [PMID: 32043791 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have reported improvement of outcomes (progression-free survival, overall survival, and prolongation of androgen deprivation treatment-free survival) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in non-small cell lung cancer and prostate cancer. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study (MITO RT-01) was to define activity and safety of SBRT in a very large, real-world data set of patients with metastatic, persistent, and recurrent ovarian cancer (MPR-OC). MATERIALS AND METHODS The endpoints of the study were the rate of complete response (CR) to SBRT and the 24-month actuarial local control (LC) rate on "per-lesion" basis. The secondary endpoints were acute and late toxicities and the 24-month actuarial late toxicity-free survival. Objective response rate (ORR) included CR and partial response (PR). Clinical benefit (CB) included ORR and stable disease (SD). Toxicity was evaluated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scales, according to center policy. Logistic and Cox regression were used for the uni- and multivariate analysis of factors predicting clinical CR and actuarial outcomes. RESULTS CR, PR, and SD were observed in 291 (65.2%), 106 (23.8%), and 33 (7.4%) lesions, giving a rate of CB of 96.4%. Patient aged ≤60 years, planning target volume (PTV) ≤18 cm3 , lymph node disease, and biologically effective dose α/β10 > 70 Gy were associated with higher chance of CR in the multivariate analysis. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 3-120), the 24-month actuarial LC rate was 81.9%. Achievement of CR and total dose >25 Gy were associated with better LC rate in the multivariate analysis. Mild toxicity was experienced in 54 (20.7%) patients; of 63 side effects, 48 were grade 1, and 15 were grade 2. The 24-month late toxicity-free survival rate was 95.1%. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the activity and safety of SBRT in patients with MPR-OC and identifies clinical and treatment parameters able to predict CR and LC rate. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study aimed to define activity and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in a very large, real life data set of patients with metastatic, persistent, recurrent ovarian cancer (MPR-OC). Patient age <60 years, PTV <18 cm3 , lymph node disease, and biologically effective dose α/β10 >70 Gy were associated with higher chance of complete response (CR). Achievement of CR and total dose >25 Gy were associated with better local control (LC) rate. Mild toxicity was experienced in 20.7% of patients. In conclusion, this study confirms the activity and safety of SBRT in MPR-OC patients and identifies clinical and treatment parameters able to predict CR and LC rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Macchia
- Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II," Unità Operativa di Radioterapia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Roberta Lazzari
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Concetta Laliscia
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Capelli
- Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Roberto D'Agostino
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCSS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II," Unità Operativa di Radioterapia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | | | - Edy Ippolito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabiola Paiar
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCSS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II," Unità Operativa di Fisica Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Rossana Ingargiola
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Huscher
- U.O. di Radioterapia Oncologica "Guido Berlucchi," Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Cerrotta
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrei Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Vicenzi
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiotherapy Department, Azienda USL Toscana sud est, San Donato Hospital-Arezzo, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Perrucci
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Fondazione Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unità Operativa Complessa Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Roma, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Fondazione "Giovanni Paolo II," Unità Operativa di Radioterapia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unità Operativa Complessa di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unità Operativa Complessa Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Roma, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Winkel D, Werensteijn-Honingh AM, Kroon PS, Eppinga WS, Bol GH, Intven MP, de Boer HC, Snoeren LM, Hes J, Raaymakers BW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM. Individual lymph nodes: "See it and Zap it". Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 18:46-53. [PMID: 31341975 PMCID: PMC6630103 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE With magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy systems such as the 1.5T MR-linac the daily anatomy can be visualized before, during and after radiation delivery. With these treatment systems, seeing metastatic nodes with MRI and zapping them with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) comes into reach. The purpose of this study is to investigate different online treatment planning strategies and to determine the planning target volume (PTV) margin needed for adequate target coverage when treating lymph node oligometastases with SBRT on the 1.5T MR-linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten patients were treated for single pelvic or para-aortic lymph node metastases on the 1.5T MR-linac with a prescribed dose of 5x7Gy with a 3 mm isotropic GTV- PTV margin. Based on the daily MRI and actual contours, a completely new treatment plan was generated for each session (adapt to shape, ATS). These were compared with plans optimized on pre-treatment CT contours after correcting for the online target position (adapt to position, ATP). At the end of each treatment session, a post-radiation delivery MRI was acquired on which the GTV was delineated to evaluate the GTV coverage and PTV margins. RESULTS The median PTV V35Gy was 99.9% [90.7-100%] for the clinically delivered ATS plans compared to 93.6% [76.3-99.7%] when using ATP. The median GTV V35Gy during radiotherapy delivery was 100% [98-100%] on the online planning and post-delivery MRIs for ATS and 100% [93.9-100%] for ATP, respectively. The applied 3 mm isotropic PTV margin is considered adequate. CONCLUSION For pelvic and para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes, online MRI-guided adaptive treatment planning results in adequate PTV and GTV coverage when taking the actual patient anatomy into account (ATS). Generally, GTV coverage remained adequate throughout the treatment session for both adaptive planning strategies. "Seeing and zapping" metastatic lymph nodes comes within reach for MRI-guided SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Winkel
- Corresponding author at: University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, Q.00.3.11, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
De Bruycker A, De Bleser E, Decaestecker K, Fonteyne V, Lumen N, De Visschere P, De Man K, Delrue L, Lambert B, Ost P. Nodal Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: Anatomic Pattern of Possible Treatment Failure in Relation to Elective Surgical and Radiotherapy Treatment Templates. Eur Urol 2019; 75:826-833. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
30
|
|
31
|
Livi L, Detti B, Francolini G, Terziani F, Triggiani L, D’Angelillo RM, Ingrosso G. Combining abiraterone and radiotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a review of current evidence. TUMORI JOURNAL 2019; 105:277-281. [DOI: 10.1177/0300891619839282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer worldwide, with a very high rate of progression despite treatment. The most aggressive form of the disease is known as castration-resistant prostate cancer, which carries a poor prognosis. We reviewed available literature regarding the combination of abiraterone acetate antihormonal drug and ablative radiation therapy for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This dual treatment may enhance the effects of second-line hormonal therapy, as radiotherapy renders cancer cells more prone to immune-mediated cytotoxicity. Moreover, radiotherapy exerts its effect both on directly irradiated cells and on other distant tissues, with an abscopal effect, already demonstrated in other solid tumors. This combination treatment is safe and effective, with few adverse events. Moreover, it is of paramount importance in patients with oligoprogression of the primary disease, when current guidelines recommend continuing abiraterone treatment. Ablative radiation therapy is a noninvasive, nontoxic treatment with very high efficacy on local tumor growth control. In the available literature, the combination of radiation therapy and abiraterone acetate has prolonged both overall survival and progression-free survival, with a positive impact also on locoregional recurrence and distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla n.3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla n.3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla n.3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Terziani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla n.3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy for oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicenter study. World J Urol 2019; 37:2631-2637. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02717-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
|
33
|
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based metastasis-directed radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2019; 37:1535-1542. [PMID: 30824985 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02701-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this communication was to assess the efficacy of directed oligometastatic radiotherapy (RT) based on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical relapse (BCR) after primary treatment with curative intent. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a monocentric cohort of PCa patients diagnosed with oligometastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and treated with metastasis-directed RT. Inclusion criteria were: histologically proven PCa, BCR after primary treatment with curative intent, oligometastatic disease defined as ≤ 3 metastatic lesions. To evaluate the efficacy of the therapy, biochemical response defined as a decrease of > 50% of PSA (PSA50) was measured at 1 and 4 months. Patients were followed up until progression and start of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). BCR-free survival and ADT-free survival were calculated. RESULTS 20 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median PSA value: 1.4 ng/ml (IQR, 0.3-2.3 ng/ml). A total of 30 PSMA-positive lesions were treated: 18 lymph nodes (60%), nine bone (30%) and three visceral lesions (10%). Median follow-up was 15 months (range 4-33 months). Biochemical response at 1 and 4 months was found in 3/20 patients (15%) and 14/20 (70%), respectively. BCR-free survival rate at 1 year was 79% and 53% at 2 years. ADT-free survival at 2 years was 74%. CONCLUSION This retrospective study suggests that metastasis-directed RT based on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT may be a valuable treatment in patients with PCa oligometastatic disease, providing promising BCR-free survival rates and potentially postponing ADT for at least 2 years in 74% of the patients. Response assessment should not be measured before 4 months after treatment.
Collapse
|
34
|
Lancia A, Zilli T, Achard V, Dirix P, Everaerts W, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Ingrosso G, Liefhooghe N, Miralbell R, Siva S, Van der Eecken K, Ost P. Oligometastatic prostate cancer: The game is afoot. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 73:84-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 01/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
35
|
Winkel D, Bol GH, Werensteijn-Honingh AM, Kiekebosch IH, van Asselen B, Intven MP, Eppinga WS, Raaymakers BW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Kroon PS. Evaluation of plan adaptation strategies for stereotactic radiotherapy of lymph node oligometastases using online magnetic resonance image guidance. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:58-64. [PMID: 33458426 PMCID: PMC7807584 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recent studies have shown that the use of magnetic resonance (MR) guided online plan adaptation yields beneficial dosimetric values and reduces unplanned violations of the dose constraints for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lymph node oligometastases. The purpose of this R-IDEAL stage 0 study was to determine the optimal plan adaptation approach for MR-guided SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) and repeated MR data from five patients with in total 17 pathological lymph nodes, six different methods of plan adaptation were performed on the daily MRI and contours. To determine the optimal plan adaptation approach for treatment of lymph node oligometastases, the adapted plans were evaluated using clinical dose criteria and the time required for performing the plan adaptation. RESULTS The average time needed for the different plan adaptation methods ranged between 11 and 119 s. More advanced adaptation methods resulted in more plans that met the clinical dose criteria [range, 0-16 out of 17 plans]. The results show a large difference between target coverage achieved by the different plan adaptation methods. CONCLUSION Results suggested that multiple plan adaptation methods, based on plan adaptation on the daily anatomy, were feasible for MR-guided SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases. The most advanced method, in which a full online replanning was performed by segment shape and weight optimization after fluence optimization, yielded the most favourable dosimetric values and could be performed within a time-frame acceptable (<5 min) for MR-guided treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Winkel
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Gijsbert H. Bol
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ilse H. Kiekebosch
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bram van Asselen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P.W. Intven
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wietse S.C. Eppinga
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas W. Raaymakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Petra S. Kroon
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Winkel D, Kroon PS, Werensteijn-Honingh AM, Bol GH, Raaymakers BW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM. Simulated dosimetric impact of online replanning for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1705-1712. [PMID: 30280631 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1512152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Online 1.5T MR imaging on the MR-linac gives better target visualization compared to CBCT and facilitates online adaptive treatment strategies including daily replanning. In this simulation study, the dosimetric impact of online replanning was investigated for SBRT of lymph node oligometastases as a method for correcting for inter-fraction anatomical changes. METHODS Pre-treatment plans were created for 17 pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, with 3 and 8 mm PTV margins reflecting our clinical practice for lymph nodes with good and poor visibility on CBCT. The dose-volume parameters of the pre-treatment plans were evaluated on daily anatomy as visible on the repeated MRIs and compared to online replanning. RESULTS With online MRI-based replanning significant dosimetric improvements are obtained for the rectum, bladder, bowel and sigmoid without compromising the target dose. The amount of unintended violations of the dose constraints for target and surrounding organs could be reduced by 75% for 8 mm and 66% for 3 mm PTV margins. CONCLUSION The use of online replanning based on the actual anatomy as seen on repeated MRI compared to online position correction for lymph node oligometastases SBRT gives beneficial dosimetric outcomes and reduces the amount of unplanned violations of dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Winkel
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Petra S. Kroon
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gijsbert H. Bol
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W. Raaymakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Delouya G, Taussky D. Pelvic radiotherapy in prostate cancer: an unresolved question. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1428-1429. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
38
|
Siva S, Bressel M, Murphy DG, Shaw M, Chander S, Violet J, Tai KH, Udovicich C, Lim A, Selbie L, Hofman MS, Kron T, Moon D, Goad J, Lawrentschuk N, Foroudi F. Stereotactic Abative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Eur Urol 2018; 74:455-462. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
39
|
Mercier C, Dirix P, Meijnders P, Vermeulen P, Van Laere S, Debois H, Huget P, Verellen D. A phase I dose-escalation trial of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for non-spine bone and lymph node metastases (DESTROY-trial). Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:152. [PMID: 30126440 PMCID: PMC6102883 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1096-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In an oligometastatic setting, metastasis-directed treatment could render patients disease free, possibly for a protracted interval. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is one of the treatment modalities that can be offered to these patients. In addition, the radiobiological qualities of SABR are promising for the use in perceived radioresistant tumours. There is also emerging evidence that SABR can stimulate the immune response, and a specific therapeutic window may exist for the optimal use of radiotherapy as an immune adjuvant. However, when SABR is considered for non-spine bone or lymph node metastases, the optimal fractionation schedule is not yet known. Methods The DESTROY-trial is a non-randomized prospective phase I trial determining a regimen of choice for patients with non-spine bone and lymph node metastases. A total of 90 patients will be included in three different treatment regimens. They will be offered stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in 5, 3 or 1 fractions. Dose-limiting toxicity will be recorded as primary endpoint. Acute and late toxicity, local response and local recurrence, and progression-free survival are secondary endpoints. Liquid biopsies will be collected throughout the course of this study from the second fractionation schedule on. Discussion Despite its almost universal use in (oligo-)metastatic patients, the level of evidence supporting radical local treatment in general, and stereotactic radiotherapy in particular, is low. This prospective phase I trial will evaluate different SABR regimens for metastases and the differences in immune-stimulatory effects. Trial registration The Ethics committee of the GZA Hospitals (B099201732915) approved this study on 05/07/2017. Amendment for translational research was approved on 06/02/2018. Trial registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03486431) on 03/04/2018 – Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Mercier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium. .,University of Antwerp, Molecular Imaging, Pathology, Radiotherapy & Oncology (MIPRO), Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Paul Meijnders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.,University of Antwerp, Molecular Imaging, Pathology, Radiotherapy & Oncology (MIPRO), Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Vermeulen
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Oncologisch Centrum GZA, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.,University of Antwerp, Molecular Imaging, Pathology, Radiotherapy & Oncology (MIPRO), Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Steven Van Laere
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Oncologisch Centrum GZA, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.,University of Antwerp, Molecular Imaging, Pathology, Radiotherapy & Oncology (MIPRO), Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hilde Debois
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Philippe Huget
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.,Departement of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Oligorecurrent prostate cancer limited to lymph nodes: getting our ducks in a row : Nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. World J Urol 2018; 37:2607-2613. [PMID: 29752513 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2322-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Oligorecurrent prostate cancer with exclusive nodal involvement represents a common state of disease, amenable to local therapy. New radio-labeled tracers have enriched the possibility of cancer detection and treatment. In this review, we aim to illustrate the main nuclear medicine diagnostic options and the role of radiotherapy in this setting of patients. METHODS We performed a PubMed search referring to the PRISMA guidelines to analyze the performance of PSMA- and choline-PET in detecting oligorecurrence limited to lymph nodes, and to review the main studies supporting either ablative stereotactic body radiotherapy or regional lymph node irradiation in this clinical setting. RESULTS PSMA-PET has shown higher efficacy in the diagnosis of nodal lesions if compared with choline-PET. More specifically, for PSA ≤ 2 ng/ml, the median detection rate of choline-PET ranges from 19.5 to 44.5%, whereas PSMA ranges from 51.5 to 74%. SBRT achieves high local control rates positively affecting progression-free survival (PFS), with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival ranging from 25 to 44 months and with low toxicity rates (0-15%). Prophylactic nodal irradiation shows 3-year PFS rates ranging from 62 to 75%, but with a potential higher risk of toxicity. However, the chosen treatment option needs to be tailored on the single patient. CONCLUSIONS Newer PET/CT radio-labeled tracers have increased disease detection in oligorecurrent prostate cancer patients. Growing evidence of their impact on metastasis-directed therapy encourages the use of the most advanced radiotherapy techniques in the clinical management of such patients.
Collapse
|
41
|
Matsushita H, Jingu K, Umezawa R, Yamamoto T, Ishikawa Y, Takahashi N, Katagiri Y, Kadoya N. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Oligometastases in Lymph Nodes-A Review. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2018; 17:1533033818803597. [PMID: 30352542 PMCID: PMC6201169 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818803597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, the concept of oligometastases has become accepted and reports on stereotactic body radiotherapy as a treatment method have been published. Lesions in the brain, lung, and liver have been reported as target lesions. However, lymph node oligometastases could be a good candidate for stereotactic body radiotherapy as well. In this study, the usability of stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastases to lymph nodes is assessed by researching for each primary site. As a result, we could consider that stereotactic body radiotherapy could be almost well applied for lymph node oligometastases from the breast, gynecological organs, and prostate. However, doubts remain concerning the usefulness of stereotactic body radiotherapy for cervical node metastases from head and neck cancer or for mediastinal node metastases from lung or esophageal cancer since late toxicities have occurred with a large radiation dose at hypofractionation to major vessels or the central respiratory tract, especially in patients with irradiation histories. In addition, high-dose irradiation is required to control lymph node metastases from colorectal cancer due to its radioresistance, and severe late adverse events would therefore occur in adjacent organs such as the gastrointestinal tract. In cases of lymph node oligometastases with a primary tumor in the stomach or esophagus, stereotactic body radiotherapy should be used limitedly at present because this patient population is not so large and these metastases are often located close to organs at risk. Because of the varied status of recurrence and varied conditions of patients, it is difficult to determine the optimal dose for tumor control. It might be reasonable to determine the treatment dose individually based on dose constraints of adjacent organs. The oligometastatic state is becoming more frequently identified with more sensitive methods of detecting such oligometastases. In addition, there seems to be another type of oligometastases, so-called induced oligometastases, following successful systemic treatment. To determine the optimal indication of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lymph node oligometastases, further investigation about the mechanisms of oligometastases and further clinical studies including a phase III study are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haruo Matsushita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of
Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of
Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of
Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of
Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yojiro Ishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of
Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of
Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yu Katagiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of
Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of
Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|