Percutaneous Ablation Versus Surgical Resection for Local Recurrence Following Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis (REPART Study-UroCCR 71)

Thermal ablation for local tumor recurrence after previous partial nephrectomy: Perioperative and oncological outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) has emerged as an alternative to salvage radical nephrectomy (RN) for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) local recurrence. We report perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients treated with PTA for RCC local recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with on-site recurrence received PTA from 2008 to 2022. Primary endpoints were perioperative outcomes, complications, and readmission rates. Secondary endpoints were on site and out site tumor recurrence. Last, we collected renal function outcomes after PTA.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) treatment time was 75 (63-106) minutes. Intraoperative complications occurred in 1 (3.7%) patient, while postoperative in 2 (7.4%). Three patients (11%) received incomplete ablation, which required in one an adjunctive PTA and in 2 RN. Overall, 4 (16%) patients developed on site recurrence after a median follow-up of 30 (23-43) months: complete local control was achieved with subsequent PTA in 3 patients, while one developed bone metastases and, therefore, no other local treatments were performed. Moreover, 6 (24%) patients developed out-site recurrence after a median follow-up of 16 (10-23) months. Last, median creatinine drop at 1 month and at 1 year after PTA was -0.03 (-0.11 to 0.01) and -0.11 (-0.20 to -0.05), while median eGFR drop was 2 (0-7.65) and 9.5 (5-13.45).

CONCLUSION

PTA is a safe and feasible approach for management of on-site recurrences after PN. Low perioperative complication rates and optimal local cancer control were achieved in most patients, with no significant impairment of residual renal function.

Association of diabetes mellitus with long-term prognosis after ablation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of ablative treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from HCC patients who underwent ablation between January 2016 and December 2019. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes, such as overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were compared between those with and without DM. Predictive factors associated with survival and recurrence were identified through univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 3528 patients enrolled in the study, 588 (16.7%) had concurrent DM. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates in patients with DM (73.8%, 33.7%, and 5.8%, respectively) were significantly (P < 0.001) lower than those in the non-DM patients (70.4%, 37.6%, and 18.6%, respectively). Likewise, significant differences (P < 0.001) in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were observed between the DM (99.9%, 78.1%, and 29.1%, respectively) and non-DM (99.9%, 85.9%, and 54.3%, respectively) patients. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified DM as an independent risk factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.982; P < 0.001] and RFS (HR, 1.175; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with DM exhibited a poorer oncological prognosis than those without DM following ablation for HCC. DM was identified as an independent factor influencing the prognosis of HCC patients after curative ablation. Thus, active therapies targeting DM might enhance oncological outcomes and facilitate individualized treatment decisions.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Management of kidney cancer

OBJECTIVE

To update the French recommendations for the management of kidney cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted for the period from 2014 to 2024. The most relevant articles concerning the diagnosis, classification, surgical treatment, medical treatment, and follow-up of kidney cancer were selected and incorporated into the recommendations. The recommendations have been updated specifying the level of evidence (strong or weak).

RESULTS

Kidney cancer following prolonged occupational exposure to trichloroethylene should be considered an occupational disease. The reference examination for the diagnosis and staging of kidney cancer is the contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominal CT scan. PET scans are not indicated in the staging of kidney cancer. Percutaneous biopsy is recommended in situations where its results will influence therapeutic decisions. It should be used to reduce the number of surgeries for benign tumors, particularly avoiding unnecessary radical nephrectomies. Kidney tumors should be classified according to the pTNM 2017 classification, the WHO 2022 classification, and the ISUP nucleolar grade. Metastatic kidney cancers should be classified according to IMDC criteria. Surveillance of tumors smaller than 2cm should be prioritized and can be offered regardless of patient age. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is the reference surgical treatment for T1 tumors. Ablative therapies and surveillance are options for elderly patients with comorbidities for tumors larger than 2cm. Stereotactic radiotherapy is an option to discuss for treating localized kidney tumors in patients not eligible for other treatments. Radical nephrectomy is the first-line treatment for locally advanced localized cancers. Pembrolizumab is recommended for patients at high risk of recurrence after surgery for localized kidney cancer. In metastatic patients, cytoreductive nephrectomy can be immediate in cases of good prognosis, delayed in cases of intermediate or poor prognosis for patients stabilized by medical treatment, or as "consolidation" in patients with complete or major partial response at metastatic sites after systemic treatment. Surgical or local treatment of metastases can be proposed for single lesions or oligometastases. Recommended first-line drugs for metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma are combinations of axitinib/pembrolizumab, nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, and lenvatinib/pembrolizumab. Patients with non-clear cell metastatic kidney cancer should be presented to the CARARE Network and prioritized for inclusion in clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

These updated recommendations are a reference that will enable French and French-speaking practitioners to optimize their management of kidney cancer.

Incidence and predictors of ipsilateral local recurrence following partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

Ipsilateral local recurrence (LR) after partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may result from a metachronous tumor or PN bed recurrence. To date, literature has predominantly reported ipsilateral LRs collectively, although the pathophysiology and prognostic implications of these event may be distinct. We sought to assess variables associated with LR and evaluated associations of LR with metastasis and death from RCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified adults undergoing PN for unilateral, sporadic, localized RCC from 2000 to 2019 using a prospectively maintained, single institution registry. LR was defined as new, enhancing tumor within/near the PN bed on MRI/CT. Cox proportional hazards models were used to create a preoperative risk score for LR and to examine the association of LR with metastasis and CSS following PN among patients with clear cell RCC.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 2,164 PNs, 106 true LRs were identified, for a 10-year incidence of 6.2%. A preoperative risk score for LR based on age, symptoms, solitary kidney, complex tumor necessitating open partial nephrectomy, and cT stage was created (c-index = 0.73). Postoperatively, positive margins, pT stage, and clear cell subtype were associated with LR. Notably, 21% (23/106) of patients with LR presented with synchronous metastases. Following LR, 5-year metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival were 64% and 71%, respectively. LR remained associated with metastasis (HR 6.25; P < 0.001) and death from RCC (HR 1.93; P = 0.03) on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a preoperative risk score to identify patients at risk for LR following PN. LR was an independent risk factor for metastasis and death from RCC. Further study is warranted to determine whether treatment of LR improves oncologic outcomes.

Long-term consequences of positive surgical margin after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: multi-institutional analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to determine the impact of positive surgical margins (PSM) after PN on very long-term recurrence in a contemporary cohort.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PN for a localized renal tumour were included. Patients were stratified according to the presence of PSM. Data on patients' characteristics, the tumour, the peri- and postoperative events were collected. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Sensitivity analyses using weighted propensity score analysis was performed to account for potential selection biases arising from the nonrandom allocation of patients to different groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1115 patients were included in the study. The incidence of PSM was 5.4% (n = 61). The median follow-up time was 51 months for the PSM group and 61 months for the NSM group (p = 0.31). Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the PSM group (13%, n = 8) compared to the NSM group (7%, n = 73) (p = 0.05). This resulted in a significant reduction in DFS in the PSM group (p = 0.004), particularly pronounced in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Additionally, OS was significantly lower in the PSM group (p < 0.01). Propensity score analysis confirmed a decrease in DFS for the PSM group (p = 0.05), while there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (p = 0.49).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective multicenter study, PSM impact on oncological outcomes, increasing recurrence, but no difference in OS was observed post-adjustment for biases.

[Nephron sparing in the management of localized solid renal mass]

Managing a malignant renal tumor requires, first of all, a reflection on the necessity of its treatment. It must consider the renal function, altered at the time of diagnosis in 50% of cases. The treatment method chosen depends on many factors, in particular, the predicted residual renal function, the risk of chronic kidney disease, the need for temporary or long-term dialysis, and overall long-term survival. Other factors include the size, position, and number of tumors and a hereditary tumor background. When a renal-sparing management alternative is available, total nephrectomy should no longer be performed in patients with small malignant renal masses (cT1a). This may consist of surgery (partial nephrectomy or lumpectomy), percutaneous thermo-ablation (by radiofrequency, microwave, or cryotherapy). In patients with limited life expectancy, imaging-based surveillance may be proposed to suggest treatment in case of local progression. Good coordination between urologist, radiologist, nephrologist, and sometimes radiotherapist should allow optimal management of patients with a malignant renal tumor with or without underlying renal failure.

Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting 3-year chronic kidney disease upstaging following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

Aim of the present study was to develop and validate a nomogram to accurately predict the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) upstaging at 3 years in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

METHODS

A multi-institutional database was queried to identify patients treated with RAPN for localized renal tumor (cT1-cT2, cN0, cM0). Significant CKD upstaging (sCKD-upstaging) was defined as development of newly onset CKD stage 3a, 3b, and 4/5. Model accuracy was calculated according to Harrell C-index. Subsequently, internal validation using bootstrapping and calibration was performed. Then nomogram was depicted to graphically calculate the 3-year sCKD-upstaging risk. Finally, regression tree analysis identified potential cut-offs in nomogram-derived probability. Based on this cut-off, four risk classes were derived with Kaplan-Meier analysis tested this classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 965 patients were identified. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, 3-year sCKD-upstaging rate was 21.4%. The model included baseline (estimated glomerular filtration rate) eGFR, solitary kidney status, multiple lesions, R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, clamping technique, and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). The model accurately predicted 3-year sCKD-upstaging (C-index 84%). Based on identified nomogram cut-offs (7 vs 16 vs 26%), a statistically significant increase in sCKD-upstaging rates between low vs intermediate favorable vs intermediate unfavorable vs high-risk patients (1.3 vs 9.2 vs 22 vs 54.2%, respectively, p < 0.001) was observed.

CONCLUSION

Herein we introduce a novel nomogram that can accurately predict the risk of sCKD-upstaging at 3 years. Based on this nomogram, it is possible to identify four risk categories. If externally validated, this nomogram may represent a useful tool to improve patient counseling and management.

Differential efficacy of ablation therapy versus partial nephrectomy between clinical T1a and T1b renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the differential clinical outcomes of patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) vs. those treated with ablation therapy (AT) such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and microwave ablation for cT1b compared to cT1a renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple databases were searched for articles published before August 2021. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared clinical outcomes in patients who underwent PN with those who underwent AT for cT1a and/or cT1b renal tumors.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 studies comprising 13,996 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. In both cT1a and cT1b renal tumors, there was no significant difference in the percent decline of estimated glomerular filtration rates or in the overall/severe complication rates between PN and AT. Compared to AT, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence in both patients with cT1a and cT1b tumors (cT1a: pooled risk ratio [RR]; 0.43, 95% confidence intervals [CI]; 0.28-0.66, cT1b: pooled RR; 0.41, 95%CI; 0.23-0.75). Subgroup analyses regarding the technical approach revealed no statistical difference in local recurrence rates between percutaneous AT and PN in patients with cT1a tumors (pooled RR; 0.61, 95%CI; 0.32-1.15). In cT1b, however, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence (pooled RR; 0.45, 95%CI; 0.23-0.88). There was no difference in distant metastasis or cancer mortality rates between PN and AT in patients with cT1a, or cT1b tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

AT has a substantially relevant disadvantage with regards to local recurrence compared to PN, particularly in cT1b renal tumors. Despite the limitations inherent to the nature of retrospective and unmatched primary cohorts, percutaneous AT could be used as a reasonable alternative treatment for well-selected patients with cT1a renal tumors.