Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy Is Better than Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate

Endoscopic enucleation vs. robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for large prostates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients' perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Since Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate [EEP] and Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy [RASP] showed comparable functional results, treatment selection is often based on clinicians' and patients' preferences. The aim of this systematic review was to compare Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures [PROMs] and Patient-Reported Experience Measures [PREMs] in patients with large prostate glands treated with EEP and RASP.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Literature search was performed on August 29th 2024 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases, following the EAU Guidelines Office and the PRISMA statement recommendations. All comparative studies reporting validated PROMs/PREMs for both interventions (EEP and RASP) were included. Studies reporting within-treatment comparisons only (e.g., HoLEP vs. ThuLEP) were excluded.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Ten studies involving 1105 patients (430 RASP, 675 EEP) were included in this systematic review. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 24 months. Considering urinary function, all authors reported a great improvement for both EEP and RASP at short- and mid-term, with no significant differences between endoscopic and robotic procedures. Alongside the lower symptom scores, patient-reported Quality of Life [QoL] significantly improved for both techniques. Erectile function remained stable after EEP and RASP in most of the studies, while some of them even reported a significant improvement. No studies reporting PREMs were retrieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Both RASP and EEP led to a great improvement in urinary function and QoL, safeguarding sexual function, with no significant difference between the different techniques in terms of functional outcomes. None of the included studies reported PREMs. A standardization of PROMs/PREMs and their integration in clinical practice is warranted, to understand the real impact of these treatments, helping physicians and patients for an individualized shared decision-making process.

Benign prostate hyperplasia over 150cm3: Should we perform an endoscopic enucleation of the prostate or robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy?

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition in ageing men, often resulting in significant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that impact quality of life. For patients with huge prostate volumes (>150mL), surgical management presents challenges. Traditionally, open simple prostatectomy (OSP) was the gold standard; however, minimally invasive approaches such as robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP), especially holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), offer similar or superior outcomes with reduced morbidity.

METHODS

This review analyzed studies comparing the perioperative, functional, and complication outcomes of RASP and HoLEP in treating very large prostates (>150mL). A comprehensive literature search was performed to evaluate evidence on surgical efficacy, complication rates, and recovery profiles.

RESULTS

Both RASP and HoLEP demonstrated excellent perioperative outcomes, with HoLEP providing reduced operative time and hospital stays. HoLEP also showed lower blood loss and a reduced need for transfusions, while RASP offered advantages in terms of precision and surgeon control, especially for anatomically complex cases. Functional outcomes, including improvement in urinary flow and symptom scores, were comparable between the two techniques. However, complications such as transient incontinence were more commonly reported with HoLEP.

CONCLUSION

Both RASP and HoLEP are effective and safe for the management of very large prostates. HoLEP offers significant advantages in perioperative recovery and reduced morbidity, whereas RASP provides excellent outcomes in complex cases requiring precise dissection. The choice between these techniques should be guided by patient-specific factors and surgical expertise. Future studies should focus on long-term functional outcomes to refine surgical recommendations further.

Beyond size: A comprehensive overview of small-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most frequently diagnosed benign disorders that cause dysuria in middle-aged and elderly men. Some patients with BPH have relatively small prostates (referred to as small-volume BPH) but still experience the lower urinary tract infection. Medication treatment is typically not successful in these patients. In addition, their pathophysiologic pathways deviate from those previously observed. Furthermore, as there is no accepted protocol for the diagnosis and treatment of small-volume BPH, patients can experience great difficulties in managing surgical complications such as bladder neck contracture. Thus, we reviewed the features of small-volume prostates, preoperative assessment, surgical technique, and management of complications.

Clinical-radiomics combination model for predicting the short-term efficacy of bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Background

Bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) is a well-established surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); however, its efficacy may vary depending on patient characteristics. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with radiomics analysis can offer comprehensive and quantitative information about prostate characteristics that may relate to surgical outcomes. This study aimed to explore the value of MRI and radiomics analysis in predicting the short-term efficacy of B-TUEP for BPH.

Materials and methods

A total of 137 patients with BPH who underwent B-TUEP at 2 institutions were included. Radiological features were measured in the MRIs, and the radiomics score was developed from 1702 radiomics features extracted from the prostate and transitional zone regions of interest. Three prediction models were developed and validated based on clinical-radiological features, radiomic features, and their combinations. The models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.

Results

The combination model exhibited the highest area under curve in both the training set (0.838) and the external validation set (0.802), indicating superior predictive performance and robustness. Furthermore, the combination model demonstrated good calibration (p > 0.05) and optimal clinical utility. The combination model indicated that a higher maximum urine flow rate, lower transitional zone index, and higher radiomics score were associated with an increased risk of poor efficacy.

Conclusions

Magnetic resonance imaging with radiomic analysis can offer valuable insights for predicting the short-term efficacy of B-TUEP in patients with BPH. A combination model based on clinical and radiomics features can assist urologists in making more precise clinical decisions.

Postoperative urinary incontinence following BPH surgery: insights from a comprehensive national database analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) is a feared complication of BPH surgery. Our study aims to investigate the incidence of UI among patients undergoing different procedures for BPH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using a large national database, containing patient records between 2011 and 2022. The most employed surgical procedures for BPH were considered, including TURP, Transurethral Incision of the Prostate (TUIP), Holmium/Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP/ThuLEP), Open Simple Prostatectomy (OSP), minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (Lap/Rob SP), Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP), Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL), Robotic Waterjet Treatment (RWT - Aquablation®), Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (WVTT - Rezum®) and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE). Rates of any type of UI, including stress UI (SUI), urge UI (UUI) and mixed UI (MUI) were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors of "persistent" postoperative UI, defined as the presence of an active UI diagnosis at 12 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Among 274,808 patients who underwent BPH surgery, 11,017 (4.01%) experienced persistent UI. UUI rates varied between 0.62% (PAE) and 2.71% (PVP), SUI ranged from 0.04% (PAE) and 2.75% (Lap/Rob SP), while MUI between 0.11% (PAE) and 1.17% (HoLEP/ThuLEP). On multivariable analysis, HoLEP/ThuLEP (OR 1.612; 95% CI: 1.508-1.721; P<0.001), PVP (OR 1.164; 95% CI:1.122-1.208; P<0.001), Open SP (OR 1.424; 95% CI:1.241- 1.624; P<0.001), and Lap/Rob SP (OR 1.667; 95% CI:1.119-2.384; P<0.01) showed significant higher likelihood of UI compared to TURP. PUL (OR 0.604; 95% CI:0.566-0.644; P<0.001), WVTT (OR 0.661; 95% CI:0.579-0.752; P<0.001), RWT (OR 0.434; 95% CI:0.216-0.767; P<0.01), and PAE (OR 0.178; 95% CI:0.111-0.269; P<0.001) were associated with lower likelihood of UI.

CONCLUSIONS

UI remains a concerning complication following BPH surgery, but it is an uncommon event affecting <5% of patients. Some differences in UI rates and risk might exist among various BPH procedures. These findings underscore the need for thorough patient selection and counseling.

Comparison of perioperative and short-terms outcomes of en-bloc Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has seen an evolution during the last decades. On one hand, en-bloc HoLEP emerged as a valid endoscopic treatment regardless prostate size. On the other hand, robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has gained attention in larger prostates showing encouraging results. Herein, for the first time in the scientific scenario, we sought to compare the outcomes of RASP and en-bloc HoLEP cases after propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively queried our prospectively database of patients treated with HoLEP or RASP between 2017 and 2022 among two high-volume centers. PSM was applied based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, prostate volume and max-flow rate. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon per center. Outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, and 6-month postoperatively and therefore annually. Trifecta definition was used to assess "success" in surgical procedures and was defined as the contemporary presence of: a) no postoperative complications within the first postoperative month; b) 1-month postoperative Qmax >15 ml/s and c) no urinary incontinence at 3-month evaluation.

RESULTS

Overall, 48 HoLEP and 47 RASPs were matched. Operative time, hospitalization time (median 4 vs 5 days) and catheterization time (median 3 vs 2 day) were found to be shorter in the HoLEP group as compared to the counterpart (p < 0.05). Early postoperative complication rate was also lower in the HoLEP cohort (6.2% vs 12.6%; p = 0.03) as well as postoperative haemoglobine blood level drop (1.4 vs 2.4 g/dL; p = 0.03). On the other hand, postoperative antegrade ejaculation (55.3% vs 6.8%) 1-month max flow (median 28 vs 24 ml/sec) and continence rates (0% vs 20.8%) favored RASP (p < 0.05). Overall, Trifecta rate was similar in the two groups (76.1% vs 82.6%).

CONCLUSION

Both HoLEP and RASP are safe and effective treatments for symptomatic BPH. HoLEP demonstrated to have lower perioperative risks while is affecting by a higher probability of transient early UI. On the other hand, RASP is more effective in reducing postoperative ejaculatory dysfunction.

Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Perioperative and Short-term Functional Outcomes Assessed via Validated Questionnaires

Background and objective

Several surgical procedures have been reported for treatment of male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to large benign outlet obstruction (BOO). The diffusion of robotic surgery offers the possibility to perform open simple prostatectomy (SP) with a minimally-invasive approach. Our aim was to report outcomes of the Retzius-sparing robot-assisted SP (RS-RASP) technique.

Methods

This was a single centre, prospective study. Patients with LUTS secondary to BOO and a prostate volume of >100 ml underwent RS-RASP performed with a da Vinci surgical system in four-arm configuration for a transperitoneal approach. Data for intraoperative and perioperative complications were collected. Functional outcomes were assessed via validated patient questionnaires. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify predictors of complications and achievement of a trifecta composite outcome.

Key findings and limitations

The median patient age was 69 yr and the median prostate volume was 150 ml. The median operative time was 175 min, with estimated blood loss of 350 ml. The median in-hospital stay and median catheterisation time were 3 d and 9 d, respectively. Within 90 d, the incidence of complications was 3% for grade 1, 19% for grade 2, and 2% for grade 3 complications. At 7-mo follow-up, statistically significant improvements in International Prostate Symptom Scores (total score and quality of life), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) scores, and the maximum flow rate were observed (all p < 0.0001). According to ICIQ-UI SF scores, 20%, 6%, and 3% of the patients had slight, moderate, or severe urinary incontinence (UI), respectively. Urgency UI was experienced by 14% of the patients and stress UI by 10%. Most of the patients with UI reported leakage of a small amount of urine and they did not wear pads.

Conclusions

RS-RASP was associated with good perioperative outcomes and a low prevalence of high-grade complications. Significant LUTS relief was achieved, but some patients experienced slight urgency or stress UI at short-term follow-up.

Patient summary

We explored a surgical technique called Retzius-sparing robot-assisted simple prostatectomy to treat men with bothersome urinary symptoms caused by a large prostate. The technique led to good results, with minimal bleeding and few complications during surgery. This surgery could be a beneficial choice for patients with stubborn urinary symptoms and a large prostate gland.

Incidence and management of BPH surgery-related urethral stricture: results from a large U.S. database

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Urethral stricture (US) is a well-known complication after surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study aimed to evaluate the contemporary incidence of the US after different types of BPH surgery, to identify associated risk factors and to assess its management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the PearlDiver™ Mariner database, containing de-identified patient records compiled between 2011 and 2022. Specific International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were employed to identify population characteristics and outcomes. All the most employed surgical procedures for BPH treatment were considered. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to evaluate factors associated with diagnosis of post-operative US.

RESULTS

Among 274,808 patients who underwent BPH surgery, 10,918 developed post-operative US (3.97%) within 12 months. Higher incidence of US was observed following TURP (4.48%), Transurethral Incision of the Prostate (TUIP) (3.67%), Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP) (3.92%), HoLEP/ThuLEP (3.85%), and open Simple Prostatectomy (SP) (3.21%). Lower incidence rates were observed after laparoscopic\robot-assisted SP (1.76%), Aquablation (1.59%), Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) (1.07%), Rezum (1.05%), and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) (0.65%). Multivariable analysis showed that patients undergoing PUL, Rezum, Aquablation, PAE, and PVP were associated with a reduced likelihood of developing US compared to TURP. US required surgical treatment in 18.95% of patients, with direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) and urethroplasty performed in 14.55% and 4.50% of cases, respectively. Urethral dilatation (UD) in an outpatient setting was the primary management in most cases (76.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present analysis from a contemporary large dataset suggests that the incidence of US after BPH surgery is relatively low (<5%) and varies among procedures. Around 94% of US cases following BPH surgery are managed using minimally invasive treatment approaches such as UD and DVIU.

Incidental Prostate Cancer in Patients Treated for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Analysis from a Contemporary National Dataset

(1) Background: Prostate Cancer (PCa) may be incidentally diagnosed during the microscopic evaluation of resected tissue from BPH surgeries, characterizing the clinical condition known as incidental PCa (iPCa). This study aims to assess the prevalence of iPCa following BPH surgery to evaluate the associated surgical procedures and to scrutinize preoperative and postoperative management. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the PearlDiver™ Mariner database, containing patient records compiled between 2011 and 2021. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were employed to identify the population and outcomes. Our primary objective was to assess the prevalence of iPCa, categorized by the type of procedures, and to evaluate the subsequent treatment strategies. The secondary aim was to assess the impact of prostate biopsy (PB) and prostate MRI on iPCa detection. (3) Results: The overall cohort, accounting for 231,626 patients who underwent BPH surgery, exhibited a 2.2% prevalence rate of iPCa. The highest rate was observed for TURP (2.32%), while the lowest was recorded for RASP (1.18%). Preoperative MRI and PB demonstrated opposing trends over the years. Of the 5090 patients identified with iPCa, nearly 68% did not receive active treatment. The most common treatments were RT and ADT; 34.6% underwent RT, 31.75% received ADT, and 21.75% were treated with RT+ADT. RP was administered to approximately 9% of patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed age and openSP as additional risk factors for iPCa. Conversely, PB and MRI before surgery were linked to a decreased risk. (4) Conclusions: The contemporary prevalence of iPCa after BPH surgery is <3%. The increase in the use of prostate MRI mirrors a decline in the PB biopsy prior to BPH surgery but without resulting in an increased detection rate of iPCa. In contemporary routine clinical practice, iPCa is mostly managed in a different way when compared to biopsy-detected PCa.

Single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: techniques and outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe the surgical techniques and to analyse the outcomes of single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) procedure for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed®, Web of Science™, and Scopus®) were queried to identify studies reporting on the technical aspects and outcomes of SP RASP. Different combinations of keywords were used, according to a free-text protocol, to identify retrospective and prospective studies, both comparative and non-comparative, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) describing surgical techniques for SP RASP and the associated surgical and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The transvesical approach represents the most common approach for SP RASP. A decrease in terms of estimated blood loss was observed when SP RASP was compared to open simple prostatectomy (OSP) and multi-port (MP) RASP. Furthermore, this technique allowed for a shorter length of hospital stay (LoS) and a lower post-operative complication rate, compared to OSP. Post-operative subjective and objective functional outcomes are satisfying and comparable to OSP and MP RASP.

CONCLUSION

SP RASP represents a safe and feasible approach for the surgical management of BPH. It provides comparable surgical and functional outcomes to MP RASP, enabling for minimal invasiveness, enhanced recovery, and potential for improving patient care.

Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy versus other treatment modalities for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6500 cases

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend simple prostatectomy or endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) as treatment of choice for bladder prostatic obstruction (BPO) caused by large prostate glands. We aimed to provide a wide-ranging analysis of the currently available evidence, comparing safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) versus open simple prostatectomy (OSP), laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP), and laser EEP.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for retrospective and prospective studies comparing RASP to OSP or LSP or laser EEP (HoLEP/ThuLEP). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendations were followed to design the search strategies, selection criteria, and evidence report. A meta-analysis evaluated perioperative safety and effectiveness outcomes. The weighted mean difference and risk ratio were used to compare continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for RCT article assessing risk of bias.

RESULTS

15 studies, including 6659 patients, were selected for meta-analysis: 13 observational studies, 1 non-randomized prospective study, and 1 randomized controlled trial. RASP was associated with statistically significant longer operative time (OT) and lower postoperative complication rate, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), and transfusion rate (TR) compared to OSP. LSP showed longer LOS and lower postoperative SHIM score, with no difference in OT, EBL, and complications. Compared to laser EEP, RASP presented longer LOS and catheterization time and higher TR. ThuLEP presented shorter OT than RASP. No difference were found in functional outcomes between groups both subjectively (IPSS, QoL) and objectively (Qmax, PVR).

CONCLUSION

RASP has become a size-independent treatment for the management of BPO caused by a large prostate gland. It can duplicate the functional outcomes of OSP while offering a better safety profile. When compared to LSP, the latter still stands as a valid lower-cost option, but it requires solid laparoscopic skill sets and therefore it is unlikely to spread on larger scale. When compared to laser EEP, RASP offers a shorter learning curve, but it still suffers from longer catheterization time and LOS.

A Novel Low-Cost Uroflowmetry for Patient Telemonitoring

Uroflowmetry (UF) is a crucial guideline-recommended tool for men with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Moreover, UF is a helpful decision-making tool for the management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In the last few years, telemedicine and telehealth have increased exponentially as cost-effective treatment options for both patients and physicians. Telemedicine and telehealth have been well positioned during the COVID-19 pandemic to prevent healthcare system overload and to ensure adequate management of patients through screening, diagnosis, and follow-up at home. In the present manuscript, the main characteristics and performance of a novel and low-cost device for home-based UF have been analyzed. The simple weight-transducer method has been applied to perform UF. An inexpensive load cell connected to a 24 bit analogic digital converter (ADC) sends data to a cloud server via SIM card or home Wi-Fi. Data are processed and shown in graphics with both volume and flow rate as a function of time, allowing for measurement of average flow rate, maximum flow rate, voided volume, and voiding time. A numerical algorithm allows for filtering of the dynamic effect due to the urine gravity acceleration and for removing the funnel to simplify the home measurement procedure. Through an online platform, the physician can see and compare each UF data. The device's reliability has been validated in a first laboratory setting and showed excellent performance. This approach based on domiciliary tests and an online platform can revolutionize the urologic clinic landscape by offering a constant patient cost-effective follow-up, eliminating the time wasted waiting in the office setting.