1
|
Ratislavová K, Horová J, Marek P. Measuring Women's Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties. Zdr Varst 2024; 63:100-108. [PMID: 38517034 PMCID: PMC10954241 DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of the quality of care provided. Evaluating women's satisfaction with childbirth is essential to improving obstetric care and ensuring a positive experience for mothers and newborns. The tools used to measure women's satisfaction with childbirth are very heterogeneous and multidimensional. Assessment tools used in practice should be tested and meet characteristics that are consistently validated.The aim is to identify currently available instruments measuring women's satisfaction with childbirth and to evaluate their structure, content and psychometric properties. Methods A systematic search for sources was carried out according to the criteria set. For the included studies, psychometric properties were assessed in accordance with the principles of the guideline for completing systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures, COSMIN. Results The review included 31 studies that reported the psychometric properties of six measurement instruments (questionnaires, scales). Content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability and cross-cultural validity were assessed for the included studies. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ/CEQ2) and Birth Satisfaction Scale - Revised (BSS-R) were the most commonly used questionnaires in the studies. Conclusions Thorough testing of tools measuring women's satisfaction with childbirth, and adapting them to cultural and social contexts, is still essential. It is crucial that valid and reliable questionnaires are available for midwives in practice, for use in research, to inform clinical practice and for the results to help develop the services offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kateřina Ratislavová
- University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Health Care Studies, Husova street 11, Pilsen, 301 00, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Horová
- University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Health Care Studies, Husova street 11, Pilsen, 301 00, Czech Republic
| | - Patrice Marek
- University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Technicka street 8, Pilsen, 301 00, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Atuesinya Azusong E, Teye-Kwadjo E, Asante KO. Effect of childbirth experience on the psychological well-being of postpartum women in Accra, Ghana. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2024:1-22. [PMID: 38511351 DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2024.2329721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women's experience of childbirth can affect their mental health outcomes, many years after the delivery. Consequently, the World Health Organisation has provided recommendations to ensure women receive positive birth experiences during intrapartum care. Yet, negative childbirth experience is widespread in Ghana. This study examined the association between women's childbirth experience (i.e. own capacity, professional support, perceived safety, and participation) and their psychological well-being, and whether or not perceived social support and resilience moderate the childbirth experience - psychological well-being relationship. METHODS Mothers (N = 117) who had given birth in the past month and were receiving postnatal care at two health facilities in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana provided the data for the current analysis. Data were collected using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire, WHO-5 Well-Being Index, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and Brief Resilience Scale. Hierarchical Linear Regression was used to analyse the data. RESULTS Results showed that childbirth experience domains of own capacity and perceived safety were significantly, and positively associated with psychological well-being. The domains of professional support and participation were not associated with psychological well-being in this sample. Perceived social support and resilience did not moderate the association between childbirth experience and psychological well-being. CONCLUSION The results suggest that efforts by birth practitioners (i.e. midwives, obstetricians, and gynaecologists) to give Ghanaian women positive childbirth experiences through the encouragement of personal control over the birthing process as well as ensuring the safety of the birthing procedure and environment would provide women with optimal mental health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Enoch Teye-Kwadjo
- Department of Psychology, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
- Department of Industrial Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
| | - Kwaku Oppong Asante
- Department of Psychology, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
- Department of Psychology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Machín-Martín E, González-de la Torre H, Bordón-Reyes H, Jeppesen-Gutiérrez J, Martín-Martínez A. Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:207. [PMID: 38504191 PMCID: PMC10949694 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06400-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several instruments have been designed to assess the childbirth experience. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is one of the most widely used tools. There is an improved version of this instrument, the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0), which has not been adapted or validated for use in Spain. The aim of present study is to adapt the CEQ 2.0 to the Spanish context and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODS This research was carried out in 2 stages. In the first stage, a methodological study was carried out in which the instrument was translated and back-translated, content validity was assessed by 10 experts (by calculating Aiken's V coefficient) and face validity was assessed in a sample of 30 postpartum women. In the second stage, a cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate construct validity by using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability evaluation (internal consistency and temporal stability) and validation by known groups. RESULTS In Stage 1, a Spanish version of the CEQ 2.0 (CEQ-E 2.0) was obtained with adequate face and content validity, with Aiken V scores greater than 0.70 for all items. A final sample of 500 women participated in Stage 2 of the study. The fit values for the obtained four-domain model were RMSEA = 0.038 [95% CI: 0.038-0.042], CFI = 0.989 [95% CI: 0.984-0.991], and GFI = 0.990 [95% CI: 0.982-0.991]. The overall Omega and Cronbach's Alpha coefficients were 0.872 [95% CI: 0.850-0.891] and 0.870 [95% CI: 0.849-0.890] respectively. A coefficient of intraclass correlation of 0.824 [95% CI: 0.314-0.936] (p ≤ 0.001) and a concordance coefficient of 0.694 [95% CI: 0.523-0.811] were obtained. CONCLUSIONS The Spanish version of CEQ 2.0 (CEQ-E 2.0), has adequate psychometric properties and is a valid, useful, and reliable instrument for assessing the childbirth experience in Spanish women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Machín-Martín
- University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio Ciencias de La Salud, C/Blas Cabrera Felipe S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex of Gran Canaria-Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
| | - Héctor González-de la Torre
- Research Support Unit of Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex of Gran Canaria, Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain.
- Department of Nursing, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio Ciencias de La Salud, C/Blas Cabrera Felipe S/N, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, 35016, Spain.
| | - Haridian Bordón-Reyes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex of Gran Canaria-Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
| | - Julia Jeppesen-Gutiérrez
- Multiprofessional Teaching Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the University Hospital Complex Insular Materno-Infantil of Gran Canaria, Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N. CP:35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria-Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Alicia Martín-Martínez
- University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio Ciencias de La Salud, C/Blas Cabrera Felipe S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex of Gran Canaria-Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cambra-Rufino L, Müller AE, Parra Casado M, Pedraz Marcos A. [Impact of hospital architecture on the birthing experience: a phenomenological study with mothers-to-be who are design experts]. An Sist Sanit Navar 2024; 47:e1059. [PMID: 38349143 PMCID: PMC11066952 DOI: 10.23938/assn.1059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The birthplace has a crucial role in shaping the childbirth experience and mothers' satisfaction levels. This study aimed to identify the experiences and perceptions that may have an impact in the long-term on mothers' birthing experience, considering hospital design features in the birthing environment until discharge. METHODS Inductive thematic analysis of twenty-five hospital labor testimonies employing a phenomenological research approach and utilizing a biographical method. Participants were women with a professional background in architecture, landscape architecture, engineering, or interior design. RESULTS The results are organized into four themes and seven subthemes. The first theme is "First sight and long term impression" which is subdivided into the subthemes "Depersonalized itinerary in entrances and corridors" and "Instinctive search for connection with nature". The second theme deals with "Accompaniment and tucking in during the birthing process", subdivided into "Hotel-like: space for movement and personalized adaptation" and "Helplessness, cold and uncertainty: spaces to be against one's will". The third theme is "Damage in collateral rooms", which includes "The integration of toilets in the birthing process", "Operating rooms unchangeable in the face of cesarean delivery" and "Neonatal units that do not integrate families". Finally, the fourth theme includes "Improvement proposals for new designs". CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the existing literature by deepening the understanding of the design features identified in hospitals in recent studies. Further research incorporating the experiences of women in the birthing process is needed to facilitate evidence-based design policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cambra-Rufino
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura. Departamento de Construcción y Tecnologías Arquitectónicas. Madrid. España.
| | | | | | - Azucena Pedraz Marcos
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Unidad de investigación en cuidados y servicios de salud (Investén). Madrid. España..
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cantor AG, Jungbauer RM, Skelly AC, Hart EL, Jorda K, Davis-O'Reilly C, Caughey AB, Tilden EL. Respectful Maternity Care : A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:50-64. [PMID: 38163377 DOI: 10.7326/m23-2676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe maternal morbidity and mortality are worse in the United States than in all similar countries, with the greatest effect on Black women. Emerging research suggests that disrespectful care during childbirth contributes to this problem. PURPOSE To conduct a systematic review on definitions and valid measurements of respectful maternity care (RMC), its effectiveness for improving maternal and infant health outcomes for those who are pregnant and postpartum, and strategies for implementation. DATA SOURCES Systematic searches of Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycInfo, and SocINDEX for English-language studies (inception to July 2023). STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions of RMC versus usual care for effectiveness studies; additional qualitative and noncomparative validation studies for definitions and measurement studies. DATA EXTRACTION Dual data abstraction and quality assessment using established methods, with resolution of disagreements through consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS Thirty-seven studies were included across all questions, of which 1 provided insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of RMC to improve maternal outcomes and none studied RMC to improve infant outcomes. To define RMC, authors identified 12 RMC frameworks, from which 2 main concepts were identified: disrespect and abuse and rights-based frameworks. Disrespect and abuse components focused on recognizing birth mistreatment; rights-based frameworks incorporated aspects of reproductive justice, human rights, and antiracism. Five overlapping framework themes include freedom from abuse, consent, privacy, dignity, communication, safety, and justice. Twelve tools to measure RMC were validated in 24 studies on content validity, construct validity, and internal consistency, but lack of a gold standard limited evaluation of criterion validity. Three tools specific for RMC had at least 1 study demonstrating consistency internally and with an intended construct relevant to U.S. settings, but no single tool stands out as the best measure of RMC. LIMITATIONS No studies evaluated other health outcomes or RMC implementation strategies. The lack of definition and gold standard limit evaluation of RMC tools. CONCLUSION Frameworks for RMC are well described but vary in their definitions. Tools to measure RMC demonstrate consistency but lack a gold standard, requiring further evaluation before implementation in U.S. settings. Evidence is lacking on the effectiveness of implementing RMC to improve any maternal or infant health outcome. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42023394769).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy G Cantor
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology; Department of Family Medicine; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (A.G.C.)
| | - Rebecca M Jungbauer
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.M.J., E.L.H., C.D.)
| | - Andrea C Skelly
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, and Aggregate Analytics, Fircrest, Washington (A.C.S.)
| | - Erica L Hart
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.M.J., E.L.H., C.D.)
| | - Katherine Jorda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.J., A.B.C.)
| | - Cynthia Davis-O'Reilly
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (R.M.J., E.L.H., C.D.)
| | - Aaron B Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.J., A.B.C.)
| | - Ellen L Tilden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (E.L.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bull C, Carrandi A, Slavin V, Teede H, Callander EJ. Development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported experience measures: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:101102. [PMID: 37517609 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Valid and reliable maternity patient-reported experience measures are critical to understanding women's experiences of care. They can support clinical practice, health service and system performance measurement, and research. The aim of this review is to identify and critically appraise the risk of bias, woman-centricity (content validity), and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported experience measures published in the scientific literature. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, and Embase were systematically searched for relevant records between January 1, 2010 and July 10, 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We searched for articles describing the instrument development of maternity patient-reported experience measures and measurement properties associated with instrument validity and reliability testing. Articles that described patient-reported experience measures developed outside of the maternity context and articles that did not contribute to the instruments' development, content validation, and/or psychometric evaluation were excluded. METHODS Included articles underwent risk of bias, content validity, and psychometric properties assessments in line with the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) guidance. Patient-reported experience measure results were summarized according to language subgroups. An overall recommendation for use was determined for each patient-reported experience measure language subgroup. RESULTS A total of 54 studies reported on the development and psychometric evaluation of 25 maternity patient-reported experience measures, grouped into 45 language subgroups. The quality of evidence underpinning the instruments' development was generally poor. Only 2 (4.4%) patient-reported experience measures reported sufficient content validity, and only 1 (2.2%) received a level "A" recommendation, required for real-world use. CONCLUSION Maternity patient-reported experience measures demonstrated poor-quality evidence for their measurement properties and insufficient detail about content validity. Future maternity patient-reported experience measure development needs to prioritize women's involvement in deciding what is relevant, comprehensive, and comprehensible to measure. Improving the content validity of maternity patient-reported experience measures will improve overall validity and reliability and facilitate real-world practice improvements. Standardized patient-reported experience measure implementation also needs to be prioritized to support advancements in clinical practice for women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Bull
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (Dr Bull, Ms Carrandi, Drs Teede and Callander).
| | - Alayna Carrandi
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (Dr Bull, Ms Carrandi, Drs Teede and Callander)
| | - Valerie Slavin
- Women-Newborn-Children's Services, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Australia (Dr Slavin)
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (Dr Bull, Ms Carrandi, Drs Teede and Callander)
| | - Emily J Callander
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (Dr Bull, Ms Carrandi, Drs Teede and Callander)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Corbaz F, Boussac E, Lepigeon K, Gomes Dias D, Marcadent S, Desseauve D, Horsch A. 'connEcted caesarean section': creating a virtual link between MOthers and their infanTs to ImprOve maternal childbirth experieNce - study protocol for a PILOT trial (e-motion-pilot). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065830. [PMID: 37286319 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One-third of mothers rate their childbirth as traumatic. The prevalence of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder (CB-PTSD) is 4.7%. Skin-to-skin contact is a protective factor against CB-PTSD. However, during a caesarean section (CS), skin-to-skin contact is not always feasible and mothers and infants are often separated. In those cases, there is no validated and available solution to substitute this unique protective factor. Based on the results of studies using virtual reality and head-mounted displays (HMDs) and studies on childbirth experience, we hypothesise that enabling the mother to have a visual and auditory contact with her baby could improve her childbirth experience while she and her baby are separated. To facilitate this connection, we will use a two-dimensional 360° camera filming the baby linked securely to an HMD that the mother can wear during the end of the surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study protocol describes a monocentric open-label controlled pilot trial with minimal risk testing the effects of a visual and auditory contact via an HMD worn by the mother airing a live video of her newborn compared with treatment-as-usual in 70 women after CS. The first 35 consecutive participants will be the control group and will receive the standard care. The next 35 consecutive participants will have the intervention. The primary outcome will be differences in maternal childbirth experience (Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2) at 1-week postpartum between the intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes will be CB-PTSD symptoms, birth satisfaction, mother-infant bonding, perceived pain and stress during childbirth, maternal anxiety and depression symptoms, anaesthesiological data and acceptability of the procedure. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Canton de Vaud (study number 2022-00215). Dissemination of results will occur via national and international conferences, peer-reviewed journals, public conferences and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05319665.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Corbaz
- Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emilie Boussac
- Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Karine Lepigeon
- Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Diana Gomes Dias
- Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - David Desseauve
- Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Antje Horsch
- Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oskoui BS, Mehrabi E, Nourizadeh R, Esmaeilpour K. The effect of mindfulness-based counseling on the childbirth experience of primiparous women: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:274. [PMID: 37085789 PMCID: PMC10119513 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05607-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unpleasant childbirth experience is considered as one of the important factors for cesarean preference. Limited studies have been investigated the impact of psycho-based interventions on the childbirth experience and the most effective counseling approach to promote a pleasant childbirth experience has not been clearly identified. OBJECTIVE The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of mindfulness-based counseling on the childbirth experience of primiparous women. METHODS AND MATERIALS This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 64 primiparous with gestational age of 32 to 34 weeks referred to the perinatology clinic of Al-Zahra and Taleghani educational-treatment hospital, affiliated to Tabriz University of Medical sciences, Iran. Participants were randomly assigned into the intervention and control groups. The intervention group received eight mindfulness-based counseling sessions. The intensity of childbirth pain with VAS (Visual Analog Scale) in the active phase of labor at 8 cm dilatation and the childbirth experience questionnaire were completed by interview after childbirth. Independent t-test and ANCOVA were used to compare the outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS After controlling the effect of confounding variables, the mean score of childbirth experience in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in control group [Mean Difference (MD): 1.79, 95% CI: 2.52 to 1.07, P < 0.01]. The mean score of labor pain in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group after controlling the effect of baseline score and confounding variables [MD: -2.21, 95% CL: -3.35 to -1.10, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION The findings indicated that providing mindfulness-based counseling improves the childbirth experience and reduces labor pain during childbirth. However, further randomized clinical trials are needed before making a definitive conclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT): IRCT20171007036615N9. Date of registration: 16/03/2022, 25/12/1400.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahare Sharegi Oskoui
- Student Research Committee, Midwifery Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Esmat Mehrabi
- Midwifery Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Roghaiyeh Nourizadeh
- Midwifery Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:176. [PMID: 36918812 PMCID: PMC10012290 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In clinical settings and research studies, childbirth experience is often measured using a single-item question about overall experience. Little is known about what women include in this rating, which complicates the design of adequate follow-up, as well as the interpretation of research findings based on ratings of overall childbirth experience. The aim of this study was to examine which known dimensions of childbirth experience women include in the rating on a single-item measure. METHODS Ratings of overall childbirth experience on a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS) from 2953 women with spontaneous or induced onset of labour at two Swedish hospitals were evaluated against the validated Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2), completed on one of the first days postpartum. The CEQ2 measures four childbirth experience domains: own capacity, perceived safety, professional support and participation. Internal consistency for CEQ2 was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha. NRS ratings were explored in relation to CEQ2 using empirical cumulative distribution function graphs, where childbirth experience was defined as negative (NRS ratings 1-4), mixed (NRS ratings 5-6) or positive (NRS ratings 7-10). A multiple linear regression analysis, presented as beta coefficients (B) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), was also performed to explore the relationship between the four domains of the CEQ2 and overall childbirth experience. RESULTS The prevalence of negative childbirth experience was 6.3%. All CEQ2-subscales reached high or acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78; 0.81; 0.69 and 0.66, respectively). Regardless of overall childbirth experience, the majority of respondents scored high on the CEQ2 subscale representing professional support. Overall childbirth experience was mainly explained by perceived safety (B = 1.60, CI 1.48-1.73), followed by own capacity (B = 0.65, CI 0.53-0.77) and participation (B = 0.43, CI 0.29-0.56). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, overall childbirth experience rated by a single-item measurement appears to mainly capture experiences of perceived safety, and to a lesser extent own capacity and participation, but appears not to reflect professional support. CEQ2 shows good psychometric properties for use shortly after childbirth, and among women with induced onset of labour, which increases the usability of the instrument.
Collapse
|
10
|
Waldum ÅH, Lukasse M, Staff AC, Falk RS, Sørbye IK, Jacobsen AF. Intrapartum pudendal nerve block analgesia and childbirth experience in primiparous women with vaginal birth: A cohort study. Birth 2023; 50:182-191. [PMID: 36529699 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A negative childbirth experience has short- and long-term consequences for both mother and child. This study aimed to investigate the association between intrapartum pudendal nerve block (PNB) analgesia and childbirth experience. METHODS Primiparous women with a singleton cephalic vaginal live births at term at Oslo University Hospital from January 1, 2017, to June 1, 2019, were eligible for inclusion. The main outcome was total score on a childbirth experience questionnaire (range 1.0-4.0, higher score indicates better childbirth experience). An absolute risk difference of 0.10 was considered clinically relevant. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between women with and without PNB. The analyses were stratified by spontaneous vs instrumental birth. Subanalyses of the questionnaire's domains (own capacity, professional support, perceived safety, and participation) were performed. RESULTS Of 979 participating women, mean age was 32 years. Childbirth experience did not differ between women with and without PNB, either in spontaneous (absolute risk difference of the mean: -0.05, P value 0.36) or in instrumental birth (absolute risk difference of the mean: 0.03, P value 0.61). There were no statistically significant differences between PNB group scores for the separate domains. CONCLUSIONS Women's childbirth experiences did not differ between birthing people with or without PNB, either in spontaneous or in instrumental births. The clinical implications of our study should be interpreted in light of the pain-relieving effects of PNB.PNB should be provided on clinical indication, including for individuals with severe labor pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åsa Henning Waldum
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mirjam Lukasse
- Centre for Women's, Family and Child Health, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.,Institute of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Cathrine Staff
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Sørum Falk
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Anne Flem Jacobsen
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goldkuhl L, Gyllensten H, Begley C, Nilsson C, Wijk H, Lindahl G, Uvnäs-Moberg K, Berg M. Impact of Birthing Room Design on Maternal Childbirth Experience: Results From the Room4Birth Randomized Trial. HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL 2023; 16:200-218. [PMID: 36239523 PMCID: PMC9755691 DOI: 10.1177/19375867221124232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the effect of the birthing room design on nulliparous women's childbirth experience up to 1 year after birth. BACKGROUND Although it is known that the birth environment can support or hinder birth processes, the impact of the birthing room design on maternal childbirth experience over time is insufficiently studied. METHODS The Room4Birth randomized controlled trial was conducted at a labor ward in Sweden. Nulliparous women in active stage of spontaneous labor were randomized (n = 406) to either a regular birthing room (n = 202) or a new birthing room designed with more person-centered considerations (n = 204). Childbirth experiences were measured 2 hr, 3 months, and 12 months after birth by using a Visual Analogue Scale of Overall Childbirth Experience (VAS-OCE), the Fear of Birth Scale (FOBS), and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ2). RESULTS Women randomized to the new room had a more positive childbirth experience reported on the VAS-OCE 3 months (p = .002) and 12 months (p = .021) after birth compared to women randomized to a regular room. Women in the new room also scored higher in the total CEQ2 score (p = .039) and within the CEQ2 subdomain own capacity after 3 months (p = .028). The remaining CEQ2 domains and the FOBS scores did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS These findings show that a birthing room offering more possibilities to change features and functions in the room according to personal needs and requirements, positively affects the childbirth experience of nulliparous women 3 and 12 months after they have given birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Goldkuhl
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden,Lisa Goldkuhl, MSc, RN, RM, Arvid Wallgrens backe, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Hanna Gyllensten
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecily Begley
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christina Nilsson
- Munkebäck Antenatal Clinic, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Helle Wijk
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Quality Assurance and Patient Safety, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden,Centre for Healthcare Architecture, CVA, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Building Design, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Göran Lindahl
- Centre for Healthcare Architecture, CVA, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Building Design, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Marie Berg
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,Faculty of Medicine and Community Health, Evangelical University in Africa, Bukavu, D. R. Congo
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Henriksen L, Debrecéniová J, Hrabovská A, Pufflerová Š, Blix E. Adaption and validation of the childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ-SK) in Slovakia. Eur J Midwifery 2023; 7:6. [PMID: 36926447 PMCID: PMC10012084 DOI: 10.18332/ejm/160973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Using validated and reliable instruments to examine women's birth experiences is important to ensure respectful care. There is a lack of validated instruments for evaluating childbirth care in the Slovak context. In this study, we aimed to adapt and validate the childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) in Slovakia (CEQ-SK). METHOD The CEQ-SK was developed and modified from the English version of the CEQ/CEQ2. Face validity was tested in two pre-tests. A convenience sample, recruited through social media, included 286 women who had given birth within the last six months. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Construct and discriminant validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis and known-group comparison. RESULTS The exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-dimensional structure, explaining 63.3% of the total variance. The factors were labelled 'Own capacity', 'Professional support' and 'Decision making'. No items were excluded. Internal consistency was demonstrated with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.94 for the total scale. Primiparous women, women who had an emergency cesarean section, and women who had been exposed to the Kristeller manoeuvre had a lower overall score on the CEQ-SK compared to parous women, women having a vaginal birth and women not exposed to the Kristeller manoeuvre. CONCLUSION The CEQ-SK was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating childbirth experience in Slovakia. The original CEQ is a four-dimensional questionnaire; however, factor analysis showed a three-dimensional structure in the Slovak sample. This needs to be taken into consideration when comparing the results from the CEQ-SK with studies that use the four-dimensional structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Henriksen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.,Division of General Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Anna Hrabovská
- Citizen, Democracy and Accountability, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | - Ellen Blix
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Valérie A, David B, Laurent G, Corinne D, Antje H. Childbirth experience, risk of PTSD and obstetric and neonatal outcomes according to antenatal classes attendance. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10717. [PMID: 35739298 PMCID: PMC9225805 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14508-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Antenatal classes have evolved considerably and include now a discussion of the parents' birth plan. Respecting this plan normally results in a better childbirth experience, an important protective factor of post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth (PTSD-FC). Antenatal class attendance may thus be associated with lower PTSD-FC rates. This cross-sectional study took place at a Swiss university hospital. All primiparous women who gave birth to singletons from 2018 to 2020 were invited to answer self-reported questionnaires. Data for childbirth experience, symptoms of PTSD-FC, neonatal, and obstetrical outcomes were compared between women who attended (AC) or not (NAC) antenatal classes. A total of 794/2876 (27.6%) women completed the online questionnaire. Antenatal class attendance was associated with a poorer childbirth experience (p = 0.03). When taking into account other significant predictors of childbirth experience, only induction of labor, use of forceps, emergency caesarean, and civil status remained in the final model of regression. Intrusion symptoms were more frequent in NAC group (M = 1.63 versus M = 1.11, p = 0.02). Antenatal class attendance, forceps, emergency caesarean, and hospitalisation in NICU remained significant predictors of intrusions for PTSD-FC. Use of epidural, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes were similar for AC and NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avignon Valérie
- Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Avenue Pierre-Decker 2, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. .,Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Domaine Rockefeller 8 avenue Rockefeller 69373 Lyon cedex 08, Lyon, France. .,Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), University of Lausanne, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Baud David
- Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Avenue Pierre-Decker 2, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gaucher Laurent
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Domaine Rockefeller 8 avenue Rockefeller 69373 Lyon cedex 08, Lyon, France.,Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dupont Corinne
- Research On Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Domaine Rockefeller 8 avenue Rockefeller 69373 Lyon cedex 08, Lyon, France
| | - Horsch Antje
- Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Avenue Pierre-Decker 2, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), University of Lausanne, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peters LL, van der Pijl MSG, Vedam S, Barkema WS, van Lohuizen MT, Jansen DEMC, Feijen-de Jong EI. Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:134. [PMID: 35180852 PMCID: PMC8857821 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04445-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making Scale (MADM) assesses women’s autonomy and role in decision making. The Mothers on Respect Index (MORi) asseses women’s experiences of respect when interacting with their healthcare providers. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0 assesses the overall experience of childbirth (CEQ2.0). There are no validated Dutch measures of the quality of women’s experiences in the intrapartum period. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of these measures in their Dutch translations. Methods The available Dutch versions of the MADM and MORi were adapted to assess experiences in the intrapartum period. The CEQ2.0 was translated by using forward-backward procedures. The three measures were included in an online survey including items on individual characteristics (i.e. maternal, birth, birth interventions). Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach’s alphas. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal Wallis or Student T-tests were applied where appropriate, to assess discrimination between women who differed on individual characteristics (known group validity). We hypothesized that women who experienced pregnancy complications and birth interventions would have statistically lower scores on the MADM, MORi and CEQ2.0, compared with women who had healthy pregnancies and physiological births. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman Rank correlations between the MADM, MORi and/or CEQ2.0. We hypothesized moderate to strong correlations between these measures. Women’s uptake of and feedback on the measures were tracked to assess acceptability and clarity. Results In total 621 women were included in the cross sectional study. The calculated Cronbach’s alphas for the MADM, MORi and CEQ, were ≥ 0.77. Knowngroup validity was confirmed through significant differences on all relevant individual characteristics, except for vaginal laceration repair. Spearman Rank correlations ranged from 0.46-0.80. In total 98% of the included women out of the eligible population completed the MADM and MORi for each healthcare professional they encountered during childbirth. The proportions of MADM and MORi-items which were difficult to complete ranged from 0.0-10.8%, 0.6-2.7%, respectively. Conclusions The results of our study showed that the Dutch version of the MADM, MORi and CEQ2.0 in Dutch are valid instruments that can be used to assess women’s experiences in the intrapartum period. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04445-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L L Peters
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,AVAG (Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen), Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - M S G van der Pijl
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Vedam
- Birth Place Laboratory, Division of Midwifery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - W S Barkema
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,AVAG (Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M T van Lohuizen
- AVAG (Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - D E M C Jansen
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E I Feijen-de Jong
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,AVAG (Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen), Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lok KYW, Fan HSL, Ko RWT, Kwok JYY, Wong JYH, Fong DYT, Shek NWM, Ngan HYS, Choi EPH. Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:126. [PMID: 35168552 PMCID: PMC8845391 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0) and assess the childbirth experiences of Chinese women. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Hong Kong from July 2020 to February 2021. In total, 975 mothers, who could read traditional Chinese and gave birth in 2020 or 2021, were included in the analysis. Data were fitted into the model proposed by the original developers using the confirmatory factor analysis. The data were then randomly split into training and validation sets for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Childbirth experiences were assessed. Factor structure, internal construct validity, internal consistency, and known-group validity were assessed. Results The originally proposed CEQ2.0 model showed a poor fit. An exploratory factor analysis identified a revised four-factor model (CEQ2.0-R) on a randomly split sample, which showed a satisfactory fit (CFI=0.912; TLI=0.884; SRMR=.053; RMSEA=0.072) on the other split sample. The revised scale comprised 13 items and four domains: (1)“Own capacity” (6 items), (2) “General support” (3 items), (3) “Perceived safety” (2 items), and (4) “Professional support” (2 items). CEQ2.0-R showed high internal construct validity and reliability. It can differentiate between participants with different characteristics, including parity, oxytocin augmentation, and companionship during labour. The childbirth experiences of the participants were merely positive, and participants reported that more support from midwives is needed. Conclusions CEQ2.0-R can adequately describe the childbirth experiences of women in Hong Kong. The questionnaire is easy to be administer and can be used to assess several domains of the childbirth experiences. It may be useful to evaluate the aspects of support needed during childbirth. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Y W Lok
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
| | - Heidi S L Fan
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Rachel W T Ko
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Jojo Y Y Kwok
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Janet Y H Wong
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Daniel Y T Fong
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Noel W M Shek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Hextan Y S Ngan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Edmond P H Choi
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weigl T, Garthus-Niegel S. [Questionnaires for the Assessment of Birth Expectancy and Birth Experience (Part 2 of a series on psychological assessment during the peripartum period)]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2021; 225:392-396. [PMID: 34058777 DOI: 10.1055/a-1471-7714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Giving birth is an intense experience and typically accompanied by severe pain. In addition to medical complications, subjective factors are likely to affect the birth experience. These include previous experiences with pregnancy and birth, previous traumatic experiences as well as birth expectations. Various questionnaires allow a standardized assessment of birth expectations and the birth experience. However, to date there is no questionnaire available in the German language that is based on diagnostic symptoms of birth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Furthermore, current screening-tools were developed for women while men's perspectives have been neglected in research on the parental birth experience. Nonetheless, questionnaires seem to be well suited for the assessment of the birth experience of both mothers and fathers. In this way, support services could be expanded, since parents sometimes report a negative birth experience even in medically uncomplicated births. Along with the goal of enabling parents to have a positive birth experience, the prevention of the development of subclinical or even full-blown posttraumatic stress disorder after birth also plays an important role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Weigl
- Psychology School, Hochschule Fresenius - University of Applied Sciences, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Susan Garthus-Niegel
- Fakultät Medizin, MSH Medical School Hamburg - University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Hamburg, Deutschland.,Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin, TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nilvér H, Wessberg A, Dencker A, Hagberg H, Wennerholm UB, Fadl H, Wesström J, Sengpiel V, Lundgren I, Bergh C, Wikström AK, Saltvedt S, Elden H. Women's childbirth experiences in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e042340. [PMID: 33827832 PMCID: PMC8031013 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare childbirth experiences in women randomly assigned to either induction of labour at 41 weeks or to expectant management until 42 weeks, in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study. DESIGN A register-based, multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial. SETTING Women were recruited at 14 hospitals in Sweden, 2016-2018. PARTICIPANTS Women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy were recruited at 41 gestational weeks. INTERVENTIONS The women were randomly assigned to induction of labour at 41 weeks (induction group, n=1381) or expectant management until 42 weeks (expectant management group, n=1379). OUTCOME MEASURES As main outcome, women's childbirth experiences were measured using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2 (CEQ2), in 656 women, 3 months after the birth at three hospitals. As exploratory outcome, overall childbirth experience was measured in 1457 women using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 1-10) within 3 days after delivery at the remaining eleven hospitals. RESULTS The total response rate was 77% (2113/2760). There were no significant differences in childbirth experience measured with CEQ2 between the groups (induction group, n=354; expectant management group, n=302) in the subscales: own capacity (2.8 vs 2.7, p=0.09), perceived safety (3.3 vs 3.2, p=0.06) and professional support (3.6 vs 3.5, p=0.38) or in the total CEQ2 score (3.3 vs 3.2, p=0.07), respectively. Women in the induction group scored higher in the subscale participation (3.6 vs 3.4, p=0.02), although with a small effect size (0.19). No significant difference was observed in overall childbirth experience according to VAS (8.0 (n=735) vs 8.1 (n=735), p=0.22). CONCLUSIONS There were no differences in childbirth experience, according to CEQ2 or overall childbirth experience assessed with VAS, between women randomly assigned to induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks. Overall, women rated their childbirth experiences high. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN26113652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Nilvér
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Anna Wessberg
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Anna Dencker
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Henrik Hagberg
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Centre of Perinatal Medicine & Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Salgrenska Akademy, Göteborgs Universitet, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Centre of Perinatal Medicine & Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Salgrenska Akademy, Göteborgs Universitet, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Helena Fadl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jan Wesström
- Centre for Clinical Research, Department of Women's Health, Dalarna County Council, Falun, Sweden
| | - Verena Sengpiel
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Centre of Perinatal Medicine & Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Salgrenska Akademy, Göteborgs Universitet, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Ingela Lundgren
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Christina Bergh
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| | - Anna-Karin Wikström
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sissel Saltvedt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenbourg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Selin L, Berg M, Wennerholm UB, Dencker A. Dosage of oxytocin for augmentation of labor and women's childbirth experiences: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021; 100:971-978. [PMID: 33176392 PMCID: PMC8248083 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to compare childbirth experiences and experience of labor pain in primiparous women who had received high‐ vs low‐dose oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labor. Material and methods A multicenter, parallel, double‐blind randomized controlled trial took place in six Swedish labor wards. Inclusion criteria were healthy primiparous women at term with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, cephalic fetal presentation, spontaneous onset of labor, confirmed delayed labor progress and ruptured membranes. The randomized controlled trial compared high‐ vs low‐dose oxytocin used for augmentation of a delayed labor progress. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2 (CEQ2) was sent to the women 1 month after birth. The CEQ2 consists of 22 items in four domains: Own capacity, Perceived safety, Professional support and Participation. In addition, labor pain was reported with a visual analog scale (VAS) 2 hours postpartum and 1 month after birth. The main outcome was the childbirth experience measured with the four domains of the CEQ2. The clinical trial number is NCT01587625. Results The CEQ2 was sent to 1203 women, and a total of 1008 women (83.8%) answered the questionnaire. The four domains of childbirth experience were scored similarly in the high‐ and low‐dose oxytocin groups of women: Own capacity (P = .36), Perceived safety (P = .44), Professional support (P = .84), Participation (P = .49). VAS scores of labor pain were reported as similar in both oxytocin dosage groups. Labor pain was scored higher 1 month after birth compared with 2 hours postpartum. There was an association between childbirth experiences and mode of birth in both the high‐ and low‐dose oxytocin groups. Conclusions Different dosage of oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labor did not affect women’s childbirth experiences assessed through CEQ2 1 month after birth, or pain assessment 2 hours or 1 month after birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotta Selin
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Vastra Gotaland , NU-Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - Marie Berg
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Vastra Gotaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Vastra Gotaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Center of Perinatal Medicine and Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Dencker
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Center for Person-centered Care, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dencker A, Bergqvist L, Berg M, Greenbrook JTV, Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:199. [PMID: 32252679 PMCID: PMC7137445 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women’s experiences of labour and birth can have both short- and long-term effects on their physical and psychological health. The original Swedish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) has shown to have good psychometric quality and ability to differentiate between groups known to differ in childbirth experience. Two subscales were revised in order to include new items with more relevant content about decision-making and aspects of midwifery support. The aim of the study was to develop new items in two subscales and to test construct validity and reliability of the revised version of CEQ, called CEQ2. Method A total of 11 new items (Professional Support and Participation) and 14 original items from the first CEQ (Own capacity and Perceived safety), were answered by 682 women with spontaneous onset of labour. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to analyse model fit. Results The hypothesised four-factor model showed good fit (CMIN = 2.79; RMR = 0.33; GFI = 0.94; CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.054 and PCLOSE = 0.12) Cronbach’s alpha was good for all subscales (0.82, 0.83, 0.76 and 0.73) and for the total scale (0.91). Conclusions CEQ2, like the first CEQ, yields four important aspects of experience during labour and birth showing good psychometric performance, including decision-making and aspects of midwifery support, in both primiparous and multiparous women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Dencker
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Liselotte Bergqvist
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marie Berg
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Josephine T V Greenbrook
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Mason Institute of Medicine, Life Science and the Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christina Nilsson
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| | - Ingela Lundgren
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics, Sahlgrenska University hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|