Lack of KRAS and BRAF mutation in renal cell carcinoma

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evolving Classification by Combined Morphologic and Molecular Means

Papillary renal cell carcinoma classification has evolved as a result of attentive morphologic observations by pathologists coupled with specific immunohistochemical, molecular, and clinical data. Refinement of this relatively common diagnostic category of renal neoplasia has resulted in the parsing out of specific renal cell carcinoma subtypes that no longer belong in the papillary renal cell carcinoma category and can have distinct familial and prognostic implications (eg, fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinomas). In addition, evolving classification has enabled more accurate diagnosis by surgical pathologists (through the description of recognizable morphologic variants). In many cases, molecular findings have aided and confirmed morphologic categorization. The combination of morphologic and molecular findings continues to provide important prognostic information for patients and their clinicians.

Development of an Accessible Gene Expression Bioinformatics Pipeline to Study Driver Mutations of Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global cause of cancer-related mortality driven by genetic and environmental factors which influence therapeutic outcomes. The emergence of next-generation sequencing technologies enables the rapid and extensive collection and curation of genetic data for each cancer type into clinical gene expression biobanks. We report the application of bioinformatics tools for investigating the expression patterns and prognostic significance of three genes that are commonly dysregulated in colon cancer: adenomatous polyposis coli (APC); B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF); and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS). Through the use of bioinformatics tools, we show the patterns of APC, BRAF and KRAS genetic alterations and their role in patient prognosis. Our results show mutation types, the frequency of mutations, tumour anatomical location and differential expression patterns for APC, BRAF and KRAS for colorectal tumour and matched healthy tissue. The prognostic value of APC, BRAF and KRAS genetic alterations was investigated as a function of their expression levels in CRC. In the era of precision medicine, with significant advancements in biobanking and data curation, there is significant scope to use existing clinical data sets for evaluating the role of mutational drivers in carcinogenesis. This approach offers the potential for studying combinations of less well-known genes and the discovery of novel biomarkers, or for studying the association between various effector proteins and pathways.

Kidney cancer biomarkers and targets for therapeutics: survivin (BIRC5), XIAP, MCL-1, HIF1α, HIF2α, NRF2, MDM2, MDM4, p53, KRAS and AKT in renal cell carcinoma

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing worldwide with an approximate 20% mortality rate. The challenge in RCC is the therapy-resistance. Cancer resistance to treatment employs multiple mechanisms due to cancer heterogeneity with multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations. These changes include aberrant overexpression of (1) anticancer cell death proteins (e.g., survivin/BIRC5), (2) DNA repair regulators (e.g., ERCC6) and (3) efflux pump proteins (e.g., ABCG2/BCRP); mutations and/or deregulation of key (4) oncogenes (e.g., MDM2, KRAS) and/or (5) tumor suppressor genes (e.g., TP5/p53); and (6) deregulation of redox-sensitive regulators (e.g., HIF, NRF2). Foci of tumor cells that have these genetic alterations and/or deregulation possess survival advantages and are selected for survival during treatment. We will review the significance of survivin (BIRC5), XIAP, MCL-1, HIF1α, HIF2α, NRF2, MDM2, MDM4, TP5/p53, KRAS and AKT in treatment resistance as the potential therapeutic biomarkers and/or targets in RCC in parallel with our analized RCC-relevant TCGA genetic results from each of these gene/protein molecules. We then present our data to show the anticancer drug FL118 modulation of these protein targets and RCC cell/tumor growth. Finally, we include additional data to show a promising FL118 analogue (FL496) for treating the specialized type 2 papillary RCC.

Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and its renal papillary adenoma analogue

AIMS

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly defined entity with distinct histomorphology and recurrent KRAS mutation. It has been estimated to constitute 4% of previously diagnosed papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). Renal papillary adenoma (PA) is suggested to be the precursor of PRCC. This study aimed to investigate the association between PRNRP and PA, particularly the morphologically similar type D PA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nephrectomy specimens of PRCC and PA from our 10-year pathology archives were retrieved and reviewed. GATA3 immunohistochemistry and RAS/BRAF testing were performed in all cases reclassified as PRNRP and all PAs with sufficient materials. Overall, PRNRP accounted for 9.1% (10 of 110) of PRCC and there was no recurrence/metastasis with a mean follow-up period of 39 months. Three novel morphological features were described, including clear cell change, mast cell infiltration and metaplastic ossification. Nine of the 10 PRNRPs showed diffuse and strong GATA3 expression and KRAS missense mutations at codon 12. One case exhibited moderate GATA3 staining on 80% of the tumour cells and RAS/BRAF wild-type. In a total of 73 PAs, 11 were classified as type D. GATA3 expression was significantly more frequent in type D versus non-type D PAs (100 versus 35%, P < 0.01). KRAS missense mutations were identified in six of eight (75%) of the type D PAs but none of the 18 non-type D PAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Type D PA was different from other types of PA and represented an analogue or a small-sized PRNRP for their identical morphology, immunophenotype and molecular signature.

Morphological, immunohistochemical, and genomic analyses of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a recently proposed entity of renal tumor. It shows a far better prognosis than papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) and frequently has KRAS missense mutation. In this study, we compared 14 cases of PRNRP and 10 cases of PRCC type 1 (PRCC1) and type 2 (PRCC2) from clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biological perspectives. We subjected all PRNRP and PRCC cases to immunohistochemical analysis. Whole-exome sequencing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for six cases of PRNRP, three cases of PRCC1, and four cases of PRCC2. A search for KRAS gene mutation in the remaining eight cases of PRNRP was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequencing. The results showed that all cases of PRNRP were pT1N0M0, none of which followed a course of recurrence or tumor-related death. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed diffuse staining of CK7, EMA, PAX8, and GATA3 but weak or negative staining of CD10, CD15, and AMACR in PRNRP. By NGS and PCR, KRAS missense mutation was detected in 11 of 14 PRNRP cases, although pathogenic KRAS mutation was not observed in PRCC1 and PRCC2. NGS analysis revealed less tumor mutation burden in PRNRP than in PRCC. PRNRP also showed no specific chromosomal copy number abnormalities, including gains of 7 and 17. In conclusion, we propose that PRNRP is a distinct condition from PRCC.

Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis Associated With Renal Cell Carcinoma Is a Neoplastic Process: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Study of 7 Cases

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic disorder composed of Langerhans cells admixed with reactive mononuclear and granulocytic cells, associated with prominent eosinophils. LCH is considered a neoplasm, driven in most cases by oncogenic RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway mutations. The disease predominantly affects children. Urinary system involvement has rarely been reported in a multisystem disease setting. We describe 7 patients who presented with LCH occurring within (6 cases) or after (1 case) a resected clear cell (n=6) or clear cell papillary (n=1) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), identified prospectively in our routine and consultation files (2012 to 2019). The patients included 5 women and 2 men, with a median age of 54 years (range, 39 to 73 y), none with a history of LCH or LCH manifestations before the time of RCC diagnosis. The median size of the RCC was 3.5 cm (range, 1.8 to 8.3 cm). Treatment included partial (5 cases), or radical (2 cases) nephrectomy. All RCCs on gross examination showed at least focal cystic changes and were low grade (World Health Organization [WHO]/International Society of Urologic Pathologists [ISUP] grade 1 to 2). The LCH foci were detected as incidental histological finding within the resected RCC in all six cases and they were limited to few high-power fields (<2 mm) in 5 of 6 cases, but in the sixth case, they occupied almost the entire clear cell papillary RCC (2 cm nodule). No LCH manifestations were detected in the normal kidney or in perinephric fat. The seventh patient developed LCH within inguinal deep soft tissue followed by systemic manifestations 6 years after clear cell RCC. Langerhans cell immunophenotype was supported by the reactivity for S-100, CD1a, and langerin and by the negative pankeratin. Successful pyrosequencing of microdissected LCH DNA revealed the V600E BRAF mutation in all 6 cases of LCH within RCC. To our knowledge, only 3 similar cases were published since 1980; the only case tested for BRAF mutation showed wild-type BRAF. This is the first study analyzing the morphologic and genetic features of a cohort of LCH associated with RCC. In our experience, these cases may be underrecognized in practice, or may erroneously be diagnosed as RCC dedifferentiation or high-grade sarcomatoid transformation. Finally, the detection of BRAF mutation further confirms that LCH in this setting is indeed a neoplasm, rather than a reactive lesion.

Role of the KEAP1-NRF2 Axis in Renal Cell Carcinoma

NRF2 is a transcription factor that coordinates the antioxidant response in many different tissues, ensuring cytoprotection from endogenous and exogenous stress stimuli. In the kidney, its function is essential in appropriate cellular response to oxidative stress, however its aberrant activation supports progression, metastasis, and resistance to therapies in renal cell carcinoma, similarly to what happens in other nonrenal cancers. While at the moment direct inhibitors of NRF2 are not available, understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate its hyperactivation in specific tumor types is crucial as it may open new therapeutic perspectives. Here, we focus our attention on renal cell carcinoma, describing how NRF2 hyperactivation can contribute to tumor progression and chemoresistance. Furthermore, we highlight the mechanism whereby the many pathways that are generally altered in these tumors converge to dysregulation of the KEAP1-NRF2 axis.

KANK1-NTRK3 fusions define a subset of BRAF mutation negative renal metanephric adenomas

Background

Metanephric adenoma (MA) is a rare benign renal neoplasm. On occasion, MA can be difficult to differentiate from renal malignancies such as papillary renal cell carcinoma in adults and Wilms̕ tumor in children. Despite recent advancements in tumor genomics, there is limited data available regarding the genetic alterations characteristic of MA. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of metanephric adenoma cases exhibiting cytogenetic aberration t (9;15)(p24;q24), and to investigate the association between t (9,15) and BRAF mutation in metanephric adenoma.

Methods

This study was conducted on 28 archival formalin fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens from patients with pathologically confirmed MA. Tissue blocks were selected for BRAF sequencing and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for chromosomal rearrangement between KANK1 on chromosome 9 (9p24.3) and NTRK3 on chromosome 15 (15q25.3), which was previously characterized and described in two MA cases.

Results

BRAF^V600E mutation was identified in 62% of our cases, 9 (38%) cases were BRAF^WT, and 4 cases were uninformative. Of the 20 tumors with FISH results, two (10%) were positive for KANK1-NTRK3 fusion. Both cases were BRAF^WT suggesting mutual exclusivity of BRAF^V600E and KANK1-NTRK3 fusion, the first such observation in the literature.

Conclusions

Our data shows that BRAF mutation in MA may not be as frequent as suggested in the literature and KANK-NTRK3 fusions may account for a subset of BRAF^WT cases in younger patients. FISH analysis for KANK1-NTRK3 fusion or conventional cytogenetic analysis may be warranted to establish the diagnosis of MA in morphologically and immunohistochemically ambiguous MA cases lacking BRAF mutations.

Frequent KRAS mutations in oncocytic papillary renal neoplasm with inverted nuclei

AIMS

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly documented rare tumour type. Its molecular pathological features have thus far been very little studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

There were 13 PRNRP cases including 3 The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cases and our 10 cases in this study. The 3 TCGA cases were found by a combined analysis of GATA3 mRNA expression levels and digital slides from the TCGA papillary renal cell carcinoma project. KRAS codon 12 mutations were identified in the three PRNRPs from TCGA. Of our 10 PRNRP cases, the mutations were also discovered using Sanger sequencing in seven (77.8%) of nine cases with available DNA, where KRAS p.G12V (n = 3), p.G12D (n = 2), p.G12R (n = 1) and p.G12C (n = 1) alterations were found. PRNRP shared similar gene expression profiles with renal distal tubules via an interprofile correlation analysis. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that genes involved in 'KEGG aldosterone regulated sodium reabsorption' or 'hallmark apical surface' were enriched in PRNRP. Moreover, polarised immunostaining patterns for L1CAM and EMA in the distal tubule were maintained in PRNRP.

CONCLUSIONS

These results imply that the tumour potentially originates from the distal tubule, especially from the cortical collecting duct, and probably retains its cell polarity, except for nuclear inversion. We therefore propose that oncocytic papillary renal neoplasm with inverted nuclei (OPRNIN) is a better name for this tumour type. OPRNIN is a kidney site-specific KRAS mutation neoplasm different from conventional papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Molecular Genetics of Renal Cell Tumors: A Practical Diagnostic Approach

Renal epithelial cell tumors are composed of a heterogeneous group of tumors with variable morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. A "histo-molecular" approach is now an integral part of defining renal tumors, aiming to be clinically and therapeutically pertinent. Most renal epithelial tumors including the new and emerging entities have distinct molecular and genetic features which can be detected using various methods. Most renal epithelial tumors can be diagnosed easily based on pure histologic findings with or without immunohistochemical examination. Furthermore, molecular-genetic testing can be utilized to assist in arriving at an accurate diagnosis. In this review, we presented the most current knowledge concerning molecular-genetic aspects of renal epithelial neoplasms, which potentially can be used in daily diagnostic practice.

Hypoxia-Associated Factor (HAF) Mediates Neurofibromin Ubiquitination and Degradation Leading to Ras-ERK Pathway Activation in Hypoxia

Low oxygen or hypoxia is a feature of all solid tumors and has been associated with aggressive disease. Here, we describe a novel mechanism for the hypoxia-dependent degradation of the Ras-GTPase-activating protein neurofibromin, by hypoxia-associated factor (HAF). We have previously characterized HAF as an oxygen-independent ubiquitin ligase for HIF-1α. Here, we show that HAF promotes neurofibromin ubiquitination and degradation independently of oxygen and pVHL, resulting in Ras-ERK pathway activation. Hypoxia enhanced HAF:neurofibromin binding independently of HAF-SUMOylation, whereas HAF knockdown increased neurofibromin levels primarily in hypoxia, supporting the role of HAF as a hypoxia-specific neurofibromin regulator. HAF overexpression increased p-ERK levels and promoted resistance of clear cell kidney cancer (ccRCC) cells to sorafenib and sunitinib in both normoxia and hypoxia. However, a greater-fold increase in sorafenib/sunitinib resistance was observed during hypoxia, particularly in pVHL-deficient cells. Intriguingly, HAF-mediated resistance was HIF-2α-dependent in normoxia, but HIF-2α-independent in hypoxia indicating two potential mechanisms of HAF-mediated resistance: a HIF-2α-dependent pathway dominant in normoxia, and the direct activation of the Ras-ERK pathway through neurofibromin degradation dominant in hypoxia. Patients with ccRCC with high HAF transcript or protein levels showed significantly decreased overall survival compared with those with low HAF. Thus, we establish a novel, nonmutational pathway of neurofibromin inactivation through hypoxia-induced HAF-mediated degradation, leading to Ras-ERK activation and poor prognosis in ccRCC. IMPLICATIONS: We describe a novel mechanism of neurofibromin degradation induced by hypoxia that leads to activation of the prooncogenic Ras-ERK pathway and resistance to therapy.

Initial response of renal cell carcinoma to vemurafenib in a patient treated for metastatic melanoma

Vemurafenib is a selective inhibitor of overactive BRAF oncogene with a substitution of lysine for glutamic acid at residue 600 (BRAFV600E), a mutation expressed in approximately 50% of all melanomas. We report a case of a patient with metastatic melanoma treated with vemurafenib, who subsequently presented with a biopsy-proven conventional renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We observed an initial complete regression of the mass while on vemurafenib. This was unexpected, given that vemurafenib is a specific inhibitor of BRAFV600E and most RCCs do not harbour this mutation.

A Rare Finding of a BRAF Mutation in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Response to BRAF-Directed Targeted Therapy

Whole exome sequencing can identify somatic mutations in malignant tumors and allow for personalized and novel treatment of common malignancies. Mutations in the BRAF gene are rare in renal cell carcinoma, and thus, BRAF inhibitors are not considered standard in the treatment of these cancers. Here, we report a case of a patient with a rare BRAF-mutated metastatic renal cell carcinoma who obtained a good clinical response to BRAF inhibition. This case underscores the value of precision medicine in an era of rapidly evolving therapeutics for malignancies.

Genetic and Chromosomal Aberrations and Their Clinical Significance in Renal Neoplasms

The most common form of malignant renal neoplasms is renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is classified into several different subtypes based on the histomorphological features. However, overlaps in these characteristics may present difficulties in the accurate diagnosis of these subtypes, which have different clinical outcomes. Genomic and molecular studies have revealed unique genetic aberrations in each subtype. Knowledge of these genetic changes in hereditary and sporadic renal neoplasms has given an insight into the various proteins and signalling pathways involved in tumour formation and progression. In this review, the genetic aberrations characteristic to each renal neoplasm subtype are evaluated along with the associated protein products and affected pathways. The potential applications of these genetic aberrations and proteins as diagnostic tools, prognostic markers, or therapeutic targets are also assessed.

Molecular and immunohistochemical characterization reveals novel BRAF mutations in metanephric adenoma

Metanephric adenoma (MA) is a rare benign renal tumor comprised of a neoplastic proliferation of primitive metanephric tubular cells. A previous study identified BRAF V600E mutations in approximately 90% of MA and found that similar BRAF exon 15 mutations are exceedingly rare in other common renal tumors, including renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. A recent follow-up study has validated mutation-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) for detection of BRAF V600E mutations in a small cohort of MA. Here, we extend these findings to a larger, independent cohort of MA, demonstrating an overall 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity for BRAF V600E IHC. In addition, we report 2 cases of MA with novel BRAF exon 15 mutations, including a V600D missense mutation and a compound V600D and K601L missense mutation. Finally, we evaluate BRAF V600E IHC in a large tissue microarray cohort of common renal tumors and find no significant expression in several renal cell carcinoma subtypes. These data support a role for BRAF V600E IHC in diagnostically challenging cases of MA and expand the spectrum of BRAF exon 15 mutations in this uncommon but unique renal neoplasm.

Congenital renal tumor: metanephric adenoma, nephrogenic rest, or malignancy?

We report a renal tumor detected by prenatal ultrasound and resected at 2 months of age. This 9-cm, solid mass was composed of tubular and papillary structures lined by small, uniform epithelial cells. There was local invasion into renal parenchyma and a tumor deposit in a hilar lymph node. The tumor was immunopositive for WT1, pankeratin, and CD10; focally positive for CK7; and negative for EMA and TFE3. Based on morphology and immunophenotype, the favored diagnosis was metanephric adenoma over Wilms tumor, renal cell carcinoma, and nephrogenic rest. However, metanephric adenoma only occasionally occurs in children and has never been reported prenatally. Alternatively, this tumor might be a congenital Wilms tumor that differentiated completely. Although the nature of the tumor remains unconfirmed, resection appears to have been curative; the patient remains disease-free 18 months following surgery alone.

BRAF mutations in pediatric metanephric tumors

Metanephric neoplasms of the kidney are uncommon, and some cases are associated with papillary carcinoma. Most cases of metanephric adenoma occur in adults, with fewer than 25 cases reported in children, and metanephric adenofibroma is even less common. The few metanephric tumors studied at the genetic level have not shown the gains of chromosomes 7 and 17 commonly seen in renal cell carcinoma, suggesting that the carcinoma arising in this setting has a separate genetic origin from the adenoma. However, the assumption that this carcinoma has the same chromosome gains as sporadic renal cell carcinoma has never been validated. We studied 4 cases of metanephric tumors in children, including 1 metanephric adenofibroma with papillary carcinoma. The composite tumor was studied by single nucleotide polymorphism array and fluorescence in situ hybridization, with the adenoma and carcinoma components analyzed separately. No copy number alterations were detected in either component. A BRAF V600E mutation has been reported in most cases of metanephric adenoma in adults. We performed BRAF V600E immunostaining and sequencing in our 4 pediatric cases. Three cases had a BRAF V600E mutation including the composite tumor, with both the adenoma and carcinoma components showing the same mutation. This finding provides the first genetic evidence that these 2 tumors are biologically linked. Ten cases each of pediatric renal cell carcinoma and Wilms tumor were immunonegative. Thus, BRAF V600E immunostaining is a helpful marker for pediatric metanephric adenoma, and additional research is required on the possible role of this mutation in the development of renal carcinoma.

Evaluation of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF gene mutations in renal cell carcinoma

A subset of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients has been shown to respond to anti-EGFR therapy. As KRAS and BRAF mutations are associated with poor response to anti-EGFR therapy in some cancers, it has been suggested that screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in RCC may be a promising strategy to identify patients who might respond to EGFR-targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the mutation status of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF in RCC patients. Renal tumors and normal renal samples from forty-eight patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for kidney cancer were used in this study. Histological classification of the tumors was performed according to International Union against Cancer (UICC) / American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification. Seventeen patients (48%) had clear-cell RCC, 7 (20%) had chromophobe RCC, and 11 patients (32%) had papillary RCC. DNA isolated from the samples was subjected to melting curve mutation analysis for EGFR, BRAF and KRAS using ABI-3130 DNA sequencer. DNA sequencing analysis of RCC samples, when compared with morphologically normal matched regions, did not show any exon mutations. Our results do not support the notion that EGFR, KRAS and BRAF might be mutated in RCC.

Appearance of malignant melanoma after a non-cutaneous cancer diagnosis

Background:

The aim of this study is to find the associations between malignant melanoma (MM) and other non-cutaneous malignancies and to see whether there are possible correlations between them.

Methods:

We analysed a sample of 1720 patients collected by our melanoma database, to identify patients with both MM and non-cutaneous primary cancer (NCC). The incidence rate (IR) included in our database was calculated as the ratio between the observed patients with NCC and those with MM.

Results:

A total of 74 patients, with both NCC and MM, were included in our analysis, corresponding to 4.30% of patients with MM present in our melanoma database. After breast cancer (24.3%; IR = 1:4), the most common malignancies were lymphomas (14.8%; IR = 1:4), renal cell carcinoma (13.5%; IR = 1:7), thyroid cancer (9.4%; IR = 1:11), and prostatic carcinoma (8.1%; IR = 1:12), followed by other cancers. Among patients with lymphomas, most patients (72.7%) had a non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Our study shows a high coexistence of multiple malignancies in patients with MM.

Conclusion:

Although we cannot definitively confirm a true association between non-skin cancers and MM, we believe that there are sufficient links for further investigation in order to identify new aetiological factors and therapeutic targets for these cancers.

BRAF mutations in metanephric adenoma of the kidney

BACKGROUND

Metanephric adenoma (MA) of the kidney is a rare, indolent tumor that may be difficult to differentiate from other small renal masses (SRMs). Genetic alterations associated with MA remain largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at defining genetic events in MA of the kidney and determining their influence in the management of this disease.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multiplexed mass spectrometric genotyping was performed on 29 MA cases after tumor DNA extraction. We also conducted a mutational screen in an additional 129 renal neoplasms. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the MA cases to assess molecular markers of signaling pathway activation. Patients' baseline characteristics, as well as follow-up data, were captured.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We used descriptive statistics for baseline clinical characteristics and incidence of mutations. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to correlate patient characteristics with mutational status.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We identified the v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) V600E mutation in 26 of 29 MA cases. These results were validated in all cases using the commercially available BRAF Pyro Kit (QIAGEN). In contrast, BRAF mutations were rare in the other 129 non-MA renal neoplasms that were screened. We detected a BRAF mutation (V600E) in only one papillary renal cell carcinoma case. In all MA tumors, we documented expression of phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase, accompanied by immunoreactivity for p16 (INK4a). All patients were treated with a partial or radical nephrectomy, and after a median follow-up of 26.5 mo, there were no local or distant recurrences. Limitations include the retrospective nature of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF V600E mutations are present in approximately 90% of all MA cases, serving as a potential valuable diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of SRMs undergoing a percutaneous biopsy. The presence of BRAF V600E and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in a largely benign tumor supports the necessity for secondary events (e.g., p16 loss) in BRAF-driven oncogenesis.

Inhibition of Ras for cancer treatment: the search continues

The RAS oncogenes (HRAS, NRAS and KRAS) comprise the most frequently mutated class of oncogenes in human cancers (33%), thus stimulating intensive effort in developing anti-Ras inhibitors for cancer treatment. Despite intensive effort, to date, no effective anti-Ras strategies have successfully made it to the clinic. We present an overview of past and ongoing strategies to inhibit oncogenic Ras in cancer. Since approaches to directly target mutant Ras have not been successful, most efforts have focused on indirect approaches to block Ras membrane association or downstream effector signaling. While inhibitors of effector signaling are currently under clinical evaluation, genome-wide unbiased genetic screens have identified novel directions for future anti-Ras drug discovery.

mTOR inhibitors in advanced renal cell carcinoma

Better understanding of the molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to the development of several targeted anti-cancer agents, several of which have since received approval for treatment of advanced disease. Two of these, the intravenous agent temsirolimus and the oral everolimus, exhibit antitumor effects through inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. This article reviews their mechanisms of action in the context of the current understanding of RCC pathophysiology, the clinical data leading to their approval, class-specific toxicities, potential molecular mechanisms behind treatment resistance and novel treatment approaches for RCC that incorporate mTOR blockade.

TRAIL-mediated signaling in prostate, bladder and renal cancer

Tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a death receptor ligand that has the ability to preferentially initiate apoptosis in malignant cells with minimal toxicity to normal cells. TRAIL-based therapeutics, including recombinant TRAIL, TRAIL-receptor agonistic antibodies and TRAIL gene therapy, have now entered clinical trials. Although these therapeutics are promising, concerns regarding TRAIL resistance are causing research efforts to shift towards the identification of effective combination therapies. Small-molecule inhibitors, natural compounds, and drugs approved for treatment of diseases other than cancer have been shown to affect TRAIL receptors, antiapoptotic proteins and survival pathways in prostate, bladder and renal cell lines and in preclinical models. Changes in endogenous TRAIL and TRAIL receptor expression during the development of genitourinary malignancies and the way in which the expression pattern is affected by treatment are of great interest, and understanding the biological consequences of such changes will be important to maximize the potential of TRAIL-based therapeutics.