1
|
Baboudjian M, Grabia A, Barret E, Mathieu R, Rozet F, Lequeu CE, Rouprêt M, Ploussard G. Real-life Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy using the French National Registry: A Plea for Promotion of Centralized Care and Access to Minimally Invasive Approaches. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:316-318. [PMID: 37863772 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy (RP) can be performed using an open (ORP), laparoscopic (LRP) or robotic (RARP) approach. Most studies, even in experienced centers, have not provided solid evidence demonstrating better outcomes when using the robotic approach. In addition, one of the remaining concerns about RARP is its cost effectiveness, leading to no reimbursement for this surgical technique in some countries and thus health care inequality. We used data from a French national registry to improve knowledge of RP outcomes in a real-world scenario in order to guide and inform health care decision-makers. A total of 21 213 RP procedures were performed in 645 French centers in 2021 (ORP 20%, LRP 25%, and RARP 55% of cases). ORP was associated with longer hospital stay (p < 0.001), higher rates of postoperative complications (p < 0.001), fewer days out of hospital within 90 d of surgery (81.7 vs 83.6 vs 84.9 d for ORP vs LRP vs RARP; p < 0.00), and higher hospitalization costs (€2424 vs €1789 vs €1302). RARP is an optimal and cost-effective approach, with several advantages over ORP. Our data can be used by health care decision-makers to facilitate access to and reimbursement for the robotic approach for RP indications. PATIENT SUMMARY: For men with prostate cancer for whom surgery is recommended, surgeons can remove the prostate using open surgery or a keyhole approach with or without robot assistance. Open surgery has higher costs, more complications, and longer hospital stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, North Academic Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
| | - Annabelle Grabia
- Medical Information and Data Department, Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Informations, Ramsay Santé, Paris, France
| | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - François Rozet
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Charles-Edouard Lequeu
- Medical Information and Data Department, Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Informations, Ramsay Santé, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France; IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duwe G, Boehm K, Becker G, Ruckes C, Sparwasser P, Haack M, Dotzauer R, Thomas A, Mager R, Tsaur I, Neumann CCM, Feick G, Carl G, Brandt MP, Haferkamp A, Höfner T. Individualized center-based analysis of urinary and sexual functional outcome after radical prostatectomy based on the prostate cancer outcome study: a post hoc pathway to patient outcome measurement analysis for quality improvement. World J Urol 2024; 42:236. [PMID: 38619659 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04950-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluate differences of patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM) based urinary continence and sexual function 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RPE) based on perioperative, surgical, and patient-specific characteristics in a large European academic urology center. MATERIALS AND METHODS All men enrolled in the Prostate Cancer Outcome Study (PCO) study who were treated with RPE between 2017 and 2021 completed EPIC-26 information surveys before and 12 months after RPE. Survey data were linked to clinical data of our institution. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the correlation between individual surgeons, patient characteristics, patient clinical data, and their urinary continence and sexual function. RESULTS In total, data of 429 men were analyzed: unstratified mean (SD) EPIC-26 domain score for urinary function decreased from 93.3 (0.7) to 60.4 (1.5) one year after RPE, respectively for sexual function from 64.95 (1.6) to 23.24 (1.1). Patients with preoperative adequate urinary function (EPIC-26 score > 80) reported significantly different mean urinary function scores between 53.35 (28.88) and 66.25 (25.15), p= 0.001, stratified by surgeons experience. On binary logistic regression analyses, only nerve sparing techniques (OR: 1,83, 95% CI: 1.01;3.21; p = 0.045) and low body mass index (OR: 0.91, CI: 0.85;0.99, p= 0.032) predicted adequate postoperative urinary function. CONCLUSIONS The results show how using provider-specific data from a larger cohort study enables to develop institution-specific analysis for functional outcomes after RPE. These models can be used for internal quality improvement as well as enhanced and provider-specific patient communication and shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Duwe
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Katharina Boehm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav-Carus, TU Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gerrit Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christian Ruckes
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials Mainz, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Sparwasser
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maximilian Haack
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Robert Dotzauer
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Anita Thomas
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Rene Mager
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christopher C M Neumann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Günther Feick
- Federal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Thomas-Mann Strasse 40, 55311, Bonn, Germany
| | - Günter Carl
- Federal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Thomas-Mann Strasse 40, 55311, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maximilian Peter Brandt
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Höfner
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Fadingerstrasse 1, 4020, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baas DJH, Reitsma J, van Gerwen L, Vleghaar J, Gehlen JMLG, Ziedses des Plantes CMP, van Basten JPA, van den Bergh RCN, Bruins HM, Collette ERP, Hoekstra RJ, Knipscheer BC, van Leeuwen PJ, Luijendijk-de Bruin D, van Roermund JGH, Sedelaar JPM, Speel TGW, Stomps SP, Wijburg CJ, Wijn RPWF, de Jong IJ, Somford DM. Validation of Claims Data for Absorbing Pads as a Measure for Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy, a National Cross-Sectional Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5740. [PMID: 38136286 PMCID: PMC10742264 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of healthcare insurance claims data for urinary incontinence (UI) pads has the potential to serve as an objective measure for assessing post-radical prostatectomy UI rates, but its validity for this purpose has not been established. The aim of this study is to correlate claims data with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for UI pad use. Patients who underwent RP in the Netherlands between September 2019 and February 2020 were included. Incontinence was defined as the daily use of ≥1 pad(s). Claims data for UI pads at 12-15 months after RP were extracted from a nationwide healthcare insurance database in the Netherlands. Participating hospitals provided PROMS data. In total, 1624 patients underwent RP. Corresponding data of 845 patients was provided by nine participating hospitals, of which 416 patients were matched with complete PROMs data. Claims data and PROMs showed 31% and 45% post-RP UI (≥1 pads). UI according to claims data compared with PROMs had a sensitivity of 62%, specificity of 96%, PPV of 92%, NPV of 75% and accuracy of 81%. The agreement between both methods was moderate (κ = 0.60). Claims data for pads moderately align with PROMs in assessing post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence and could be considered as a conservative quality indicator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J. H. Baas
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Reitsma
- Zorgverzekeraars Nederland, 3700 AM Zeist, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jaron Vleghaar
- Vektis Intelligence, Vektis, 3700 AS Zeist, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jean Paul A. van Basten
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - H. Max Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, 6419 PC Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Robert J. Hoekstra
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ben C. Knipscheer
- Department of Urology, Treant Zorggroep, 7824 AA Emmen, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joep G. H. van Roermund
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J. P. Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tommy G. W. Speel
- Department of Urology, Leeuwarden Medical Center, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia P. Stomps
- Department of Urology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, 7609 PP Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Carl J. Wijburg
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Rob P. W. F. Wijn
- Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 5223 GZ Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Igle Jan de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M. Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schepens MH, van Hooff ML, van der Galiën O, Ziedses des Plantes CM, Somford DM, van Leeuwen PJ, Busstra MB, Repping S, Wouters MW, van Limbeek J. Does Centralization of Radical Prostatectomy Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Urinary Incontinence? EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 58:47-54. [PMID: 38152486 PMCID: PMC10751543 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background On the basis of previous analyses of the incidence of urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), the hospital RP volume threshold in the Netherlands was gradually increased from 20 per year in 2017, to 50 in 2018 and 100 from 2019 onwards. Objective To evaluate the impact of hospital RP volumes on the incidence and risk of UI after RP (RP-UI). Design setting and participants Patients who underwent RP during 2016-2020 were identified in the claims database of the largest health insurance company in the Netherlands. Incontinence was defined as an insurance claim for ≥1 pads/d. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The relationship between hospital RP volume (HV) and RP-UI was assessed via multivariable analysis adjusted for age, comorbidity, postoperative radiotherapy, and lymph node dissection. Results and limitations RP-UI incidence nationwide and by RP volume category did not decrease significantly during the study period, and 5-yr RP-UI rates varied greatly among hospitals (19-85%). However, low-volume hospitals (≤120 RPs/yr) had a higher percentage of patients with RP-UI and higher variation in comparison to high-volume hospitals (>120 RPs/yr). In comparison to hospitals with low RP volumes throughout the study period, the risk of RP-UI was 29% lower in hospitals shifting from the low-volume to the high-volume category (>120 RPs/yr) and 52% lower in hospitals with a high RP volume throughout the study period (>120 RPs/yr for 5 yr). Conclusions A focus on increasing hospital RP volumes alone does not seem to be sufficient to reduce the incidence of RP-UI, at least in the short term. Measurement of outcomes, preferably per surgeon, and the introduction of quality assurance programs are recommended. Patient summary In the Netherlands, centralization of surgery to remove the prostate (RP) because of cancer has not yet improved the occurrence of urinary incontinence (UI) after surgery. Hospitals performing more than 120 RP operations per year had better UI outcomes. However, there was a big difference in UI outcomes between hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike H.J. Schepens
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden UMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Healthcare Strategy and Innovation, Cirka BV, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda L. van Hooff
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Onno van der Galiën
- Department of Strategy and Innovation, Zilveren Kruis Health Insurance, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | | | - Diederik M. Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Netherlands Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn B. Busstra
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd Repping
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W.J.M. Wouters
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden UMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques van Limbeek
- Department of Medical Advice, Zilveren Kruis Health Insurance, Zeist, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bernal J, Venkatesan K, Martins FE. Erectile Dysfunction in Pelvic Cancer Survivors and Current Management Options. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072697. [PMID: 37048780 PMCID: PMC10095222 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Pelvic malignancies, including prostate, rectal, and bladder cancers, are among the most frequent malignancies found in the male population. These issues are most effectively and commonly treated with radiotherapy and/or surgery. However, these treatments can cause collateral damage, resulting in significant impacts on quality of life, with erectile dysfunction being one of the most frequent postoperative complications. Currently, there are several treatment options for erectile dysfunction, including oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, vacuum erection devices, intracorporeal injections, and penile prosthesis. The latter has shown to be an effective and safe technique, with results comparable to those obtained by patients without pelvic surgery or radiotherapy. The results of early penile rehabilitation programs are promising and they have been incorporated into a greater proportion of treatment plans more recently, with varying degrees of success. In this narrative review, we summarize the literature on erectile dysfunction after pelvic cancer treatments and its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Bernal
- Department of Urology, Hospital Sotero del Rio/Clinica Indisa, Santiago 13123, Chile
| | - Krishnan Venkatesan
- Department of Urology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - Francisco E Martins
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Hospital Santa Maria, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Contrera KJ, Tam S, Pytynia K, Diaz EM, Hessel AC, Goepfert RP, Lango M, Su SY, Myers JN, Weber RS, Eguia A, Pisters PWT, Adair DK, Nair AS, Rosenthal DI, Mayo L, Chronowski GM, Zafereo ME, Shah SJ. Impact of Cancer Care Regionalization on Patient Volume. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2331-2338. [PMID: 36581726 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13029-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer centers are regionalizing care to expand patient access, but the effects on patient volume are unknown. This study aimed to compare patient volumes before and after the establishment of head and neck regional care centers (HNRCCs). METHODS This study analyzed 35,394 unique new patient visits at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) before and after the creation of HNRCCs. Univariate regression estimated the rate of increase in new patient appointments. Geospatial analysis evaluated patient origin and distribution. RESULTS The mean new patients per year in 2006-2011 versus 2012-2017 was 2735 ± 156 patients versus 3155 ± 207 patients, including 464 ± 78 patients at HNRCCs, reflecting a 38.4 % increase in overall patient volumes. The rate of increase in new patient appointments did not differ significantly before and after HNRCCs (121.9 vs 95.8 patients/year; P = 0.519). The patients from counties near HNRCCs, showed a 210.8 % increase in appointments overall, 33.8 % of which were at an HNRCC. At the main campus exclusively, the shift in regional patients to HNRCCs coincided with a lower rate of increase in patients from the MDACC service area (33.7 vs. 11.0 patients/year; P = 0.035), but the trend was toward a greater increase in out-of-state patients (25.7 vs. 40.3 patients/year; P = 0.299). CONCLUSIONS The creation of HNRCCs coincided with stable increases in new patient volume, and a sizeable minority of patients sought care at regional centers. Regional patients shifted to the HNRCCs, and out-of-state patient volume increased at the main campus, optimizing access for both local and out-of-state patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Contrera
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samantha Tam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Kristen Pytynia
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo M Diaz
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C Hessel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miriam Lango
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Randal S Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arturo Eguia
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Deborah K Adair
- Department of Global Business Development, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ajith S Nair
- Department of Global Business Development, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory M Chronowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark E Zafereo
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Shalin J Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Padayachee J, Chaudhary S, Shim B, So J, Lim R, Raman S. Utilizing clinical, pathological and radiological information to guide postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:293-305. [PMID: 36795862 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2181795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A detectable and rising PSA following radical prostatectomy is indicative of recurrent prostate cancer. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with/without androgen deprivation therapy represents the main treatment option for these patients and has been historically associated with a biochemical control rate of ~70%. To determine the optimal timing, diagnostic workup, radiotherapy dosefractionation, treatment volume, and use of systemic therapy, several informative studies have been conducted in the last decade. AREAS COVERED This review examines the recent evidence to guide radiotherapy decision making in the SRT setting. Key topics include adjuvant vs salvage RT, utilization of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, length of androgen deprivation therapy, inclusion of elective pelvic volume, and emerging role for hypofractionation. EXPERT OPINION Recently reported trials, conducted in an era prior to the routine use of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, have been pivotal in establishing the current standard of care for SRT in prostate cancer. However, decisions about radiation treatment and systemic therapy may be tailored based on available prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Data from contemporary clinical trials are awaited to define and establish individualized, biomarker-driven approaches for SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerusha Padayachee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Simone Chaudhary
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Shim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan So
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Remy Lim
- Mercy PET/CT Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moazzam Z, Lima HA, Alaimo L, Endo Y, Ejaz A, Beane J, Dillhoff M, Cloyd J, Pawlik TM. Hepatopancreatic Surgeons Versus Pancreatic Surgeons: Does Surgical Subspecialization Impact Patient Care and Outcomes? J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:750-759. [PMID: 36857013 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05639-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatopancreatic (HP) surgeon and hospital procedural volume may vary relative to liver or pancreas cases. We sought to investigate the impact of surgeon and hospital pancreatic subspecialization on patient outcomes. METHODS Patients who underwent pancreatic surgery between 2013-2017 were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. The surgery subspecialization index (SSI) was calculated to signify surgeon and hospital pancreatic subspecialization, and categorized as low, intermediate, and high SSI. The association of SSI with Textbook Outcome (TO) and its components, failure to rescue (FTR), discharge to home and index admission expenditures was assessed with mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Among 19,625 patients, most pancreatic procedures were characterized by high SSI (Low SSI: 27.7%, Intermediate SSI: 34.7%, High SSI: 37.7%). Notably, higher SSI was associated with greater odds of achieving a TO [Intermediate SSI: OR 1.16 (95%CI 1.06-1.27); High SSI: OR 1.23 (95%CI 1.11-1.35)] as well as being discharged home, and lower odds of experiencing FTR. Furthermore, this association persisted in both low-volume [referent: Low SSI; Intermediate SSI: OR 1.14 (95%CI 1.01-1.28); High SSI: OR 1.15 (95%CI 1.02-1.31)] and high-volume hospitals [referent: Low SSI; Intermediate SSI: OR 1.16 (95%CI 1.01-1.32); High SSI: OR 1.26 (95%CI 1.09-1.45)]. CONCLUSIONS Greater pancreatic subspecialization was associated with improved postoperative outcomes following pancreatic resection. Amidst increasing efforts to improve quality of care, surgical subspecialization may play a role in determining patient outcomes regardless of total surgeon or hospital volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zorays Moazzam
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Henrique Araujo Lima
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joal Beane
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Radical prostatectomy readmissions: Causes, risk factors, national rates, & costs. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:106.e1-106.e8. [PMID: 36402714 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Readmissions have substantial clinical and financial impacts on the healthcare system. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered a standard treatment in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Yet, there is a paucity of research evaluating readmissions for RP in a national dataset. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer managed with RP were identified within the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patient factors, facility factors, and surgical characteristics were evaluated for associations with readmission using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS A total of 133,727 patients receiving RP were identified. Early (30-day) and late (31-90-day) readmission rates were 4.2% and 1.8% respectively. The most common cause of early readmission was postoperative digestive system complication (10%) and the most common cause of late readmission was septicemia (13%). On multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with both early and late readmission include nonroutine discharge at index (early: OR 1.877, 95% CI 1.667-2.113; late: OR 1.801, 95% CI 1.490-2.183), and circulatory system comorbidity (early: OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.082-1.538); late: OR 1.515, 95% CI 1.157-1.984). CONCLUSIONS Our findings regarding factors associated with readmission provide insight for RP counseling and may inform postoperative care pathways. Elucidation of readmission trends may allow the identification and proactive management of patients at higher risk for readmission.
Collapse
|
10
|
Mapping European Association of Urology Guideline Practice Across Europe: An Audit of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use Before Prostate Cancer Surgery in 6598 Cases in 187 Hospitals Across 31 European Countries. Eur Urol 2023; 83:393-401. [PMID: 36639296 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-practice gaps exist in urology. We previously surveyed European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for strong recommendations underpinned by high-certainty evidence that impact patient experience for which practice variations were suspected. The recommendation "Do not offer neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before surgery for patients with prostate cancer" was prioritised for further investigation. ADT before surgery is neither clinically effective nor cost effective and has serious side effects. The first step in improving implementation problems is to understand their extent. A clear picture of practice regarding ADT before surgery across Europe is not available. OBJECTIVE To assess current ADT use before prostate cancer surgery in Europe. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was an observational cross-sectional study. We retrospectively audited recent ADT practices in a multicentre international setting. We used nonprobability purposive sampling, aiming for breadth in terms of low- versus high-volume, academic, versus community and public versus private centres. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Our primary outcome was adherence to the ADT recommendation. Descriptive statistics and a multilevel model were used to investigate differences between countries across different factors (volume, centre type, and funding type). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with low, intermediate, and high risk, and for those with locally advanced prostate cancer. We also collected reasons for nonadherence. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We included 6598 patients with prostate cancer from 187 hospitals in 31 countries from January 1, 2017 to May 1, 2020. Overall, nonadherence was 2%, (range 0-32%). Most of the variability was found in the high-risk subgroup, for which nonadherence was 4% (range 0-43%). Reasons for nonadherence included attempts to improve oncological outcomes or preoperative tumour parameters; attempts to control the cancer because of long waiting lists; and patient preference (changing one's mind from radiotherapy to surgery after neoadjuvant ADT had commenced or feeling that the side effects were intolerable). Although we purposively sampled for variety within countries (public/private, academic/community, high/low-volume), a selection bias toward centres with awareness of guidelines is possible, so adherence rates may be overestimated. CONCLUSIONS EAU guidelines recommend against ADT use before prostate cancer surgery, yet some guideline-discordant ADT use remains at the cost of patient experience and an additional payer and provider burden. Strategies towards discontinuation of inappropriate preoperative ADT use should be pursued. PATIENT SUMMARY Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is sometimes used in men with prostate cancer who will not benefit from it. ADT causes side effects such as weight gain and emotional changes and increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and osteoporosis. Guidelines strongly recommend that men opting for surgery should not receive ADT, but it is unclear how well the guidance is followed. We asked urologists across Europe how patients in their institutions were treated over the past few years. Most do not use ADT before surgery, but this still happens in some places. More research is needed to help doctors to stop using ADT in patients who will not benefit from it.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang Q, Mine S, Nasu M, Fukunaga T, Nojiri S, Zhang CD. Association of hospital volume and long-term survival after esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2023; 10:1161938. [PMID: 37151870 PMCID: PMC10160622 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1161938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It remains controversial whether esophageal cancer patients may benefit from esophagectomy in specialized high-volume hospitals. Here, the effect of hospital volume on overall survival (OS) of esophageal cancer patients post esophagectomy was assessed. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant published articles between January 1990 and May 2022. The primary outcome was OS after esophagectomy in high- vs. low-volume hospitals. Random effect models were applied for all meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis were performed based on volume grouping, sample size, study country, year of publication, follow-up or study quality. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using the leave-one-out method. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the study quality. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidance, and was registered (identifier: INPLASY202270023). Results A total of twenty-four studies with 113,014 patients were finally included in the meta-analysis. A significant improvement in OS after esophagectomy was observed in high-volume hospitals as compared to that in their low-volume counterparts (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.71-0.84, P < 0.01). Next, we conducted subgroup analysis based on volume grouping category, consistent results were found that high-volume hospitals significantly improved OS after esophagectomy than their low-volume counterparts. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analyses further confirmed that all the results were robust. Conclusions Esophageal cancer should be centralized in high-volume hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Wang
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Shinji Mine
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Correspondence: Shinji Mine
| | - Motomi Nasu
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsu Fukunaga
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuko Nojiri
- Medical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chun-Dong Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rocco B, Giorgia G, Simone A, Tommaso C, Mattia S, Stefano T, Ahmed E, Giorgio B, De Concilio B, Celia A, Salvatore M, Sighinolfi MC. Rectal Perforation During Pelvic Surgery. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 44:54-59. [PMID: 36093319 PMCID: PMC9449548 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Rectal perforations during pelvic surgery are rare but serious complications. The occurrence of rectal involvement is generally lower than that of the involvement of other portions of the bowel. The urologic field is responsible for the majority of iatrogenic rectal injuries from pelvic surgery; general and gynecologic surgeries are prone to the occurrence as well, the latter especially in the case of rectal shaving for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Attention should be posed to the prevention of rectal injuries, especially in case of challenging or salvage procedures; some tricks may be recommended to avoid thermal and mechanical damages and to realize a safe dissection. Intraoperative detection of rectal injuries is of paramount importance; once confirmed, immediate management with the closure of the defect is recommended. In general, rectal injuries diagnosed after surgery are liable to significantly worse outcomes than those detected and managed intraoperatively. Patient summary Rectal perforation is a rare but possible complication of pelvic surgeries. The more challenging the procedure (ie, surgery for locally advanced tumors or after radiation therapy), the higher the risk of rectal lesion. Intraoperative management of the injury should be attempted, with direct repair of the defect with or without fecal diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Rocco
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy,Corresponding author. Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. Tel. +39 335 830 6522.
| | - Gaia Giorgia
- Department of Gynecology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Assumma Simone
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy,Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Calcagnile Tommaso
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy,Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Sangalli Mattia
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Terzoni Stefano
- SIG Group on Continence Care, European Association of Urology Nurses, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Eissa Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | | | | | - Antonio Celia
- San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano Del Grappa, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Micali Salvatore
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Martin RK, Persson A, Moatshe G, Fenstad AM, Engebretsen L, Drogset JO, Visnes H. Low annual hospital volume of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not associated with higher revision rates. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:1575-1583. [PMID: 34236479 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06655-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgery performed in low-volume centres has been associated with longer operating time, longer hospital stays, lower functional outcomes, and higher rates of revision surgery, complications and mortality. This has been reported consistently in the arthroplasty literature, but there is a paucity of data regarding the relationship between surgical volume and outcome following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose was to compare ACL reconstruction failure rates between hospitals performing different annual surgical volumes. METHODS All patients from the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register having primary autograft ACL reconstruction between 2004 and 2016 were included. Hospital volume was divided into quintiles based on the number of ACL reconstructions performed annually, defined arbitrarily as: 1-12 (V1), 13-24 (V2), 25-49 (V3), 50-99 (V4) and ≥ 100 (V5) annual procedures. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival curves and survival percentages were calculated with revision ACL reconstruction as the end point. Secondary outcome measures included (1) mean change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life (QoL) and Sport subsections from pre-operative to 5-year follow-up and (2) subjective failure defined as KOOS QoL < 44. RESULTS Twenty thousand eight hundred and fifty patients met the inclusion criteria and 1195 (5.7%) underwent subsequent revision ACL reconstruction over the study period. Revision rates were lower in the lower volume hospitals compared with the higher volume hospitals (p < 0.001). There was no clinically significant difference in improvement between pre-operative and 5-year follow-up KOOS scores between hospital volume categories, but a higher proportion of patients having surgery at lower volume hospitals reported a subjective failure. Patients in the lower volume categories (V1-3) were more often male and older compared to the higher volume hospitals (V4-5). Concomitant meniscal injuries and participation in pivoting sports were most common in V5 compared with V1 (p < 0.001). Median operative time decreased as hospital volume increased, ranging from 90 min at V1 hospitals to 56 min at V5 hospitals (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients having ACL reconstruction at lower volume hospitals had a lower rate of subsequent revision surgery relative to higher volume hospitals. However, complications occurred more frequently, operative duration was longer, and the number of patients reporting a subjective failure of ACL reconstruction was highest at these lower volume hospitals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Kyle Martin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 1900 CentraCare Circle, Saint Cloud, MN, 56303, USA.
| | - Andreas Persson
- Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martina Hansens Hospital, Baerum, Norway
- Norwegian National Knee Ligament Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Gilbert Moatshe
- Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Marie Fenstad
- Norwegian National Knee Ligament Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Engebretsen
- Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jon Olav Drogset
- Norwegian National Knee Ligament Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Håvard Visnes
- Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian National Knee Ligament Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen Z, Wu J, Sun K, He Y, Zhu Z, Xiao L, Sheng L. Risk model based on MRI fusion biopsy characteristics predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate 2022; 82:566-575. [PMID: 35067945 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine the prostate cancer biochemical recurrence-related fusion biopsy characteristics before radical surgery and to establish the risk prediction model of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. METHODS Three hundred and four patients undergoing radical surgery for prostate cancer at Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University between 2009 and 2020 for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before biopsy with suspicious prostate cancer lesions. Each case was followed by a 10 + x needle combination of targeted biopsy (intentional or robotic fusion) with systematic biopsy. Prostate-specific antigen levels were measured at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, followed by reexamination every 6 months. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate analysis by Cox, and Logistic risk regression models. RESULTS Higher Prostate Imaging Reporting And Data System (PI-RADS) scores (p < 0.001), suspicious extracapsular invasion (p < 0.001), and seminal vesicle invasion (p < 0.001) on MRI, the largest lesion diameter on MRI (p = 0.006), higher biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (p < 0.001) related to higher biochemical recurrence rates, higher pathological staging (p < 0.001), and a greater probability of local lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001). We accurately predicted the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical surgery based on preoperative features including the long diameter of the largest MRI lesion more than 23 mm, seminal vesicle invasion on MRI, and targeted fusion biopsy ISUP grade >3 Risk stratified classification (AUC = 0.729, p < 0.001). In our cohort, this risk stratification had a larger area under the curve than predictive models based only on magnetic resonance parameters and traditional risk scores. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort, seminal vesicle invasion on MRI, the long diameter of the largest MRI lesion, and targeted fusion biopsy ISUP grade grope are significantly predictive of pathologic features and biochemical recurrence after prostate surgery. The risk stratification integrating the three parameters could better predict the biochemical recurrence than the traditional model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihao Chen
- Department of Urology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianhong Wu
- Department of Urology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kening Sun
- Department of Urology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yijun He
- Department of Urology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenfang Zhu
- Department of Image, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Xiao
- Department of Pathology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Sheng
- Department of Urology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baboudjian M, Gondran-Tellier B, Grabia A, Barret E, Beauval JB, Brureau L, Crehange G, Dariane C, Fiard G, Fromont G, Gauthe M, Mathieu R, Renard-Penna R, Roubaud G, Ruffion A, Sargos P, Lequeu CE, Roupret M, Ploussard G. Perioperative outcomes after radical prostatectomy; does the surgical approach change the impact of hospital volume? A nationwide analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:638-640. [PMID: 35274905 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04886-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception Academic Hospital, Marseille, France - .,Department of Urology, APHM, North Academic Hospital, Marseille, France - .,Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France -
| | - Bastien Gondran-Tellier
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, APHM, Conception Academic Hospital, Marseille, France
| | | | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Laurent Brureau
- Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, University of Antilles, University of Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail), Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | | | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Mathieu Gauthe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Scintep - Institut Daniel Hollard, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Department of Radiology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Equipe 2 - Centre d'Innovation en cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY), Faculty of Medicine Lyon Sud, University Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Morgan Roupret
- 8Department of Urology, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Islami F, Guerra CE, Minihan A, Yabroff KR, Fedewa SA, Sloan K, Wiedt TL, Thomson B, Siegel RL, Nargis N, Winn RA, Lacasse L, Makaroff L, Daniels EC, Patel AV, Cance WG, Jemal A. American Cancer Society's report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:112-143. [PMID: 34878180 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In this report, the authors provide comprehensive and up-to-date US data on disparities in cancer occurrence, major risk factors, and access to and utilization of preventive measures and screening by sociodemographic characteristics. They also review programs and resources that have reduced cancer disparities and provide policy recommendations to further mitigate these inequalities. The overall cancer death rate is 19% higher among Black males than among White males. Black females also have a 12% higher overall cancer death rate than their White counterparts despite having an 8% lower incidence rate. There are also substantial variations in death rates for specific cancer types and in stage at diagnosis, survival, exposure to risk factors, and receipt of preventive measures and screening by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location. For example, kidney cancer death rates by sex among American Indian/Alaska Native people are ≥64% higher than the corresponding rates in each of the other racial/ethnic groups, and the 5-year relative survival for all cancers combined is 14% lower among residents of poorer counties than among residents of more affluent counties. Broad and equitable implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as increasing health insurance coverage through Medicaid expansion or other initiatives, could substantially reduce cancer disparities. However, progress will require not only equitable local, state, and federal policies but also broad interdisciplinary engagement to elevate and address fundamental social inequities and longstanding systemic racism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhad Islami
- Cancer Disparity Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Carmen E Guerra
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adair Minihan
- Screening and Risk Factors Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Health Services Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Screening and Risk Factors Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kirsten Sloan
- Public Policy, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Tracy L Wiedt
- Health Equity, Prevention and Early Detection, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Blake Thomson
- Cancer Disparity Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Surveillance Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nigar Nargis
- Tobacco Control Research, Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert A Winn
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Lisa Lacasse
- American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Laura Makaroff
- Prevention and Early Detection, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Elvan C Daniels
- Extramural Discovery Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alpa V Patel
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - William G Cance
- Office of the Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ploussard G, Grabia A, Barret E, Beauval JB, Brureau L, Créhange G, Dariane C, Fiard G, Fromont G, Gauthé M, Mathieu R, Renard-Penna R, Roubaud G, Ruffion A, Sargos P, Rouprêt M, Lequeu CE. Same-day-discharge Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Annual Countrywide Analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 36:23-25. [PMID: 35005649 PMCID: PMC8715288 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
There are no countrywide data regarding the utilization of same-day-discharge (SDD) surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We aimed to evaluate the annual number of SDD RARP procedures in France and to compare postoperative outcomes in SDD versus non-SDD centers. Data for all 9651 patients undergoing RARP in France in 2020 were extracted from the central database of the national healthcare system. Endpoints were length of hospital stay, patient age, center volume, lymph node dissection, and the hospital readmission rate. Overall, 184 SDD cases (1.9%) were reported in 14.2% of RARP centers. The annual RARP and SDD RARP caseload ranged from 41 to 485, and from one to 47, respectively, in SDD centers. SDD was significantly associated with higher-volume centers (p < 0.001). No difference in readmission rate (7.9% vs 5.1%; p = 0.141) was observed for SDD versus non-SDD centers. Direct stay costs were estimated at €1457 in SDD centers compared to €2021 in non-SDD centers. The main limitation is the lack of detailed patient characteristics and readmission causes. This annual nationwide analysis suggests that SDD RARP remains infrequently used in routine practice in France despite being associated with comparable short-term outcomes after RARP and potential cost benefits. Patient summary We evaluated the use of robot-assisted removal of the prostate (RARP) with same-day hospital discharge in France for men with prostate cancer. In 2020, only 1.9% of the 9651 RARP procedures involved same-day discharge, even though the data show that this approach has lower costs and comparable safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Laurent Brureau
- Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | | | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Mathieu Gauthé
- INSERM UMR 1153, Unité de Recherche Clinique en Économie de la Santé, Paris, France
| | | | - Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Department of Radiology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Service d'Urologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Centre d'Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Department of Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kosiba M, Hoeh B, Welte MN, Krimphove MJ, Vitucci K, Lindemann N, Schröder J, Jost L, Schmidt FE, von Hollen A, Kluth LA, Mandel P, Roos FC, Chun FKH, Becker A. Learning curve and functional outcomes after laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia according to surgeon's caseload. World J Urol 2022; 40:3007-3013. [PMID: 36289106 PMCID: PMC9712403 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04177-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of surgical caseload on safety, efficacy, and functional outcomes of laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) applying a structured mentoring program. METHODS Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and functional outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Linear and logistic regression models analyzed the effect of caseload on complications, functional outcomes and operative speed. Within the structured mentoring program a senior surgeon was present for the first 24 procedures completely, for partial steps in procedures 25-49, and as needed thereafter. RESULTS A total of 677 patients from our prospective institutional database (2017-2022) were included for analysis. Of these, 84 (12%), 75 (11%), 82 (12%), 106 (16%), and 330 patients (49%) were operated by surgeons at (A) < 25, (B) 25-49, (C) 50-99, (D) 100-199, and (E) ≥ 200 procedures. Preoperative characteristics were balanced (all p > 0.05) except for prostate volume, which increased with caseload. There was no significant difference in change of IPSS, Quality of life, ICIQ, pad usage, peak urine flow, residual urine, and major complications (Group A: 8.3 to E: 7.6%, p = 0.2) depending on the caseload. Caseload was not associated (Odds ratio: 0.7-1.4, p > 0.2) with major complications in the multivariable logistic regression model. Only operating time was significantly shorter with increasing caseload in the multivariable analysis (111-55 min, beta 23.9-62.9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION With a structured mentoring program, the safety and efficacy of LEP can be ensured even during the learning curve with very good outcome quality. Only the operating time decreases significantly with increasing experience of the surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Kosiba
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - B. Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC Canada
| | - M. N. Welte
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - M. J. Krimphove
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - K. Vitucci
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - N. Lindemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - J. Schröder
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - L. Jost
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - F. E. Schmidt
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - A. von Hollen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - L. A. Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - P. Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - F. C. Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - F. K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - A. Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Ain, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vehawn J, O'Neil B. Identifying Top Talent to Improve Prostatectomy Sexual Outcomes: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? JAMA Surg 2021; 157:144-145. [PMID: 34851362 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffery Vehawn
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Brock O'Neil
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Maier M, Ebert AK, Baunacke M, Groeben C, Eisenmenger N, Thomas C, Huber J. [Health care reality of selected pediatric urologic surgeries in Germany from 2006 to 2019]. Urologe A 2021; 60:1291-1303. [PMID: 34524493 PMCID: PMC8492598 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01636-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Die konservative und chirurgische Behandlung von Kindern ist in der urologischen Facharztweiterbildung fest verankert und stellt eine Kernkompetenz der urologischen Versorgung dar. Berufspolitisch wird seit vielen Jahren ein zunehmender Verlust dieses Schwerpunkts befürchtet. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, reale Fallzahlen und eine mögliche Dynamik in der Verteilung kinderurologischer Eingriffe auf die Fachabteilungen für Urologie und Kinderchirurgie in Deutschland zu prüfen. Material und Methoden Als Index-Eingriffe definierten wir Operationen des Hodenhochstands, der Hypospadie und des vesikoureteralen Refluxes (VUR). Mithilfe der Software reimbursement.INFO (RI Innovation GmbH, Hürth) werteten wir die öffentlich zugänglichen Qualitätsberichtsdaten der deutschen Krankenhäuser von 2006 bis 2019 aus und wiesen sie den entsprechenden Fachrichtungen zu. Ergebnisse Die Orchidopexie erfolgt häufiger in der Urologie, wohingegen die Hypospadiekorrektur und die operative Therapie des VUR häufiger in der Kinderchirurgie durchgeführt werden. Anteilig zeigte sich für die Orchidopexie und die operative Refluxtherapie keine relevante Verschiebung zwischen urologischen und kinderchirurgischen Kliniken im Untersuchungszeitraum. Bei den Hypospadiekorrekturen nimmt der Anteil der Operationen in kinderchirurgischen Einheiten zu (p < 0,0001). In der Kinderchirurgie erfolgen 84–93 % der analysierten Eingriffe in High-volume-Abteilungen während dieser Anteil in der Urologie bei 56–73 % liegt. Insbesondere die operative Refluxtherapie in der Urologie erfolgt zu einem hohen Anteil als Gelegenheitseingriff (30 % „very low volume“). Schlussfolgerung Die Qualitätsberichtsdaten ermöglichen die Erfassung der Fallzahlen und die Analyse der Verteilung zwischen Urologie und Kinderchirurgie in Deutschland. Dabei ist für die Hypospadiekorrektur eine relevante Verschiebung in Richtung der Kinderchirurgie zu beobachten. Die Ursachen und möglichen berufspolitischen Konsequenzen dieser ersten Erhebung sind komplex und bedürfen weiterer Analysen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Maier
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Anne-Karoline Ebert
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - Martin Baunacke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Christer Groeben
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | | | - Christian Thomas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Johannes Huber
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shah TT, Cathcart P. Surgical Volume Is Important for Radical Prostatectomy, but Now We Need to Move Beyond Volume as a Proxy for Quality. Eur Urol 2021; 80:546-548. [PMID: 34092437 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|