Genome sequencing as a first-line diagnostic test for hospitalized infants

Benefits and barriers to broad implementation of genomic sequencing in the NICU

Genome (GS) and exome (ES) sequencing as first-tier diagnostic tests have the potential to increase rates of genetic diagnoses and acutely change the management of neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, the widespread implementation of genomic sequencing has been limited by several barriers. In this systematic review, we analyze the current literature on the utilization of GS and ES in infants in the NICU to identify the benefits, barriers, and components of successful implementation. Across the 42 studies that discussed GS and ES in the NICU setting, six themes were identified: disease detection, timeliness of results, cost, provider attitudes, parental attitudes, and equitable access. Benefits of GS and ES include high disease detection rates, timely results, and possible reduction in healthcare costs by reducing time spent in the NICU. Additionally, clinicians find GS/ES to be important and useful, and parents and caregivers largely perceive GS/ES to be beneficial. Barriers to widespread GS/ES include availability of personnel to facilitate timely diagnosis and coverage of cost. Additionally, clinicians report worries about a lack of genetics knowledge, informed consent, results return, and potential harm. Parents consistently report low levels of anxiety, decisional conflict, harm, or regret. Finally, the lack of availability of translated consent documents limits the participation of families who do not speak English or Spanish. Continued work is essential to optimize these technologies and ensure equitable access.

First-Tier Versus Last-Tier Trio Whole-Genome Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Pediatric-Onset Rare Diseases

Despite advances in diagnostics, children with rare genetic disorders still face extended diagnostic odysseys, delaying appropriate clinical management, and placing burdens on families and healthcare resources. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offers a more comprehensive interrogation of the genome than other genetic tests, but its use in clinical practice remains limited. This study compared diagnostic rates, turnaround times, and clinical utility of first-tier versus last-tier trio-WGS for patients with suspected genetic pediatric-onset conditions, including 97 critical and 104 non-critical patients. Eighty-five patients (42.3%), including 57 (58.8%) critical and 28 (26.9%) non-critical patients, received a molecular diagnosis. The diagnostic rate was higher for first-tier (57%) than for last-tier (32.8%) trio-WGS. Of 121 causative variants identified, 19.8% would have been missed by whole-exome sequencing. Laboratory processing time was 4 days for all patients. The clinical setting had the greatest impact on time to reporting, averaging 5 days for critical patients versus 74 days for outpatients. WGS results impacted clinical decision-making for 34% of all critical and 14.3% of WGS-positive non-critical patients. This is the first Italian clinical study to demonstrate the diagnostic and clinical utility of a genome-first approach for both critical and non-critical patients with suspected genetic pediatric-onset disorders and feasibility in a public healthcare system.

Biallelic FGF4 Variants Linked to Thoracic Dystrophy and Respiratory Insufficiency

The thoracic dystrophies are inherited skeletal conditions where abnormal embryonic development of the thoracic skeleton results in a narrow chest, pulmonary hypoplasia, and respiratory insufficiency, which can be severe or lethal. The majority of thoracic dystrophies are due to biallelic alterations in genes needed for normal ciliary function. However, despite the identification of over 20 genes as causal for the thoracic dystrophy phenotype, around 20% of patients remain without a molecular diagnosis. We present two unrelated families with a clinical diagnosis of thoracic dystrophy with associated respiratory insufficiency without a molecular diagnosis on previous genetic testing. Both harbor rare biallelic and predicted deleterious missense substitutions in FGF4, a gene known to be essential for formation of the thoracic skeleton in mice. We demonstrate that the phenotype is restricted to short ribs, abnormally narrow chest, and respiratory insufficiency, without other diagnostic clinical or radiological signs. We suggest that biallelic alterations in FGF4 are a newly identified disease association of thoracic dystrophy.

Genomic sequencing in diverse and underserved pediatric populations: Parent perspectives on understanding, uncertainty, psychosocial impact, and personal utility of results

PURPOSE

Limited evidence evaluates parents' perceptions of their child's clinical genome-scale sequencing (GS) results, particularly among individuals from medically underserved groups. Five Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium studies performed GS in children with suspected genetic conditions with high proportions of individuals from underserved groups to address this evidence gap.

METHODS

Parents completed surveys of perceived understanding, personal utility, and test-related distress after GS result disclosure. We assessed outcomes' associations with child- and parent-related factors: child age; type of GS finding; and parent health literacy, numeracy, and education.

RESULTS

A total of 1763 parents completed surveys; 83% met "underserved" criteria based on race, ethnicity, and risk factors for barriers to access. We observed high perceived understanding and personal utility and low test-related distress. Outcomes were associated with the type of GS finding; parents of children with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic finding endorsed higher personal utility and more test-related distress than those whose children had a variant of uncertain significance or normal finding. Personal utility was higher in parents who met the criteria for "underserved."

CONCLUSION

Our findings shed light on correlates of parents' cognitive and emotional responses to their child's GS findings and emphasize the need for tailored support in disclosure discussions.

Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Infants and Children with Suspected, Undiagnosed Genetic Diseases: Evolution to a First-Tier Clinical Laboratory Test in the Era of Precision Medicine

The completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 has led to significant advances in patient care in medicine, particularly in diagnosing and managing genetic diseases and cancer. In the realm of genetic diseases, approximately 15% of critically ill infants born in the U.S.A. are diagnosed with genetic disorders, which comprise a significant cause of mortality in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. The introduction of rapid whole-genome sequencing (rWGS) as a first-tier test in critically ill children with suspected, undiagnosed genetic diseases is a breakthrough in the diagnosis and subsequent clinical management of such infants and older children in intensive care units. Rapid genome sequencing is currently being used clinically in the USA, the UK, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Australia, among other countries. This review is intended for students and clinical practitioners, including non-experts in genetics, for whom it provides a historical background and a chronological review of the relevant published literature for the progression of pediatric diagnostic genomic sequencing leading to the development of pediatric rWGS in critically ill infants and older children with suspected but undiagnosed genetic diseases. Factors that will help to develop rWGS as a clinical test in critically ill infants and the limitations are briefly discussed, including an evaluation of the clinical utility and accessibility of genetic testing, education for parents and providers, cost-effectiveness, ethical challenges, consent issues, secondary findings, data privacy concerns, false-positive and false-negative results, challenges in variant interpretation, costs and reimbursement, the limited availability of genetic counselors, and the development of evidence-based guidelines, which would all need to be addressed to facilitate the implementation of pediatric genomic sequencing in an effective widespread manner in the era of precision medicine.

Homozygous synonymous FAM111A variant underlies an autosomal recessive form of Kenny-Caffey syndrome

FAM111A (family with sequence similarity 111 member A) is a serine protease and removes covalent DNA-protein cross-links during DNA replication. Heterozygous gain-of-function variants in FAM111A cause skeletal dysplasias, such as the perinatal lethal osteocraniostenosis and the milder Kenny-Caffey syndrome (KCS). We report two siblings born to consanguineous parents with dysmorphic craniofacial features, postnatal growth retardation, ophthalmologic manifestations, hair and nail anomalies, and skeletal abnormalities such as thickened cortex and stenosis of the medullary cavity of the long bones suggestive of KCS. Using exome sequencing, a homozygous synonymous FAM111A variant, NM_001312909.2:c.81 G > A; p.Pro27=, that affects the last base of the exon and is predicted to alter FAM111A pre-mRNA splicing, was identified in both siblings. We identified aberrantly spliced FAM111A transcripts, reduced FAM111A mRNA levels, and near-complete absence of FAM111A protein in fibroblasts of both patients. After treatment of patient and control fibroblasts with different concentrations of camptothecin that induces covalent DNA-protein cross-links, we observed a tendency towards a reduced proportion of metabolically active cells in patient compared to control fibroblasts. However, under these culture conditions, we did not find consistent and statistically significant differences in cell cycle progression and apoptotic cell death between patient and control cells. Our findings show that FAM111A deficiency underlies an autosomal recessive form of FAM111A-related KCS. Based on our results and published data, we hypothesize that loss of FAM111A and FAM111A protease hyperactivity, as observed for gain-of-function patient-variant proteins, may converge on a similar pathomechanism underlying skeletal dysplasias.

Exome and Genome Sequencing to Diagnose the Genetic Basis of Neonatal Hypotonia: An International Consortium Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hypotonia is a relatively common finding among infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Consideration of genetic testing is recommended early in the care of infants with unexplained hypotonia. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield and overall impact of exome and genome sequencing (ES and GS).

METHODS

Consecutive infants with hypotonia were identified from research and clinical databases across 5 teaching hospitals in United States, Canada, United Kingdom, and Australia. Inclusion criteria included NICU admission and genetic evaluation. Infants with a known explanation for hypotonia were excluded. Data regarding infant characteristics, genetic testing, and diagnoses were collected. The primary outcome was identification of a molecular diagnosis. Impact on care was a secondary outcome. The Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 147 infants with unexplained hypotonia. The median gestational age was 39 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 36-42 weeks), 77 (52%) were female, and the median age was 8 days at the time of evaluation (IQR 2-19 days). Eighty (54%) had hypotonia as the main clinical feature while 67 (46%) had additional multisystem involvement. Seventy-five (51%) underwent rapid ES, 44 (30%) rapid GS, 2 (1%) both ES and GS, and 26 (18%) were admitted before ES or GS became available. Of the 121 infants who underwent ES and/or GS, 72 (60%) had the primary outcome of a molecular diagnosis. In addition, 2 infants with mitochondrial genome variants were diagnosed by mitochondrial GS after negative ES, and one infant needed targeted testing to identify a short tandem repeat expansion missed by GS. The proportion diagnosed by ES and GS was not different between infants with hypotonia as the primary finding (37/56, 66%) and infants with multisystemic symptoms (35/65, 54%, odds ratio [OR] 1.7, CI 0.8-3.7, p value = 0.20). Testing was more likely to have an impact on care for infants receiving a genetic diagnosis (57/66 vs 14/33, OR 8.4, CI 2.9-26.1, p = 1.0E-05).

DISCUSSION

Rapid ES and GS provided a molecular diagnosis for most of the infants with unexplained hypotonia who underwent testing. Further studies are needed to assess the generalizability of these findings as increased access to genetic testing becomes available.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that in unexplained neonatal hypotonia, rapid ES or GS adds diagnostic specificity.

Long-read genome sequencing and variant reanalysis increase diagnostic yield in neurodevelopmental disorders

Variant detection from long-read genome sequencing (lrGS) has proven to be more accurate and comprehensive than variant detection from short-read genome sequencing (srGS). However, the rate at which lrGS can increase molecular diagnostic yield for rare disease is not yet precisely characterized. We performed lrGS using Pacific Biosciences "HiFi" technology on 96 short-read-negative probands with rare diseases that were suspected to be genetic. We generated hg38-aligned variants and de novo phased genome assemblies, and subsequently annotated, filtered, and curated variants using clinical standards. New disease-relevant or potentially relevant genetic findings were identified in 16/96 (16.7%) probands, nine of which (8/96, ∼9.4%) harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. Nine probands (∼9.4%) had variants that were accurately called in both srGS and lrGS and represent changes to clinical interpretation, mostly from recently published gene-disease associations. Seven cases included variants that were only correctly interpreted in lrGS, including copy-number variants (CNVs), an inversion, a mobile element insertion, two low-complexity repeat expansions, and a 1 bp deletion. While evidence for each of these variants is, in retrospect, visible in srGS, they were either not called within srGS data, were represented by calls with incorrect sizes or structures, or failed quality control and filtration. Thus, while reanalysis of older srGS data clearly increases diagnostic yield, we find that lrGS allows for substantial additional yield (7/96, 7.3%) beyond srGS. We anticipate that as lrGS analysis improves, and as lrGS data sets grow allowing for better variant-frequency annotation, the additional lrGS-only rare disease yield will grow over time.

Secondary ACMG and non-ACMG genetic findings in a multiethnic cohort of 16,713 pediatric participants

PURPOSE

Clinical next-generation sequencing is an effective approach for identifying pathogenic sequence variants that are medically actionable for participants and families but are not associated with the participant's primary diagnosis. These variants are called secondary findings (SFs). According to the literature, there is no report of the types and frequencies of SFs in a large pediatric cohort that includes substantial African-American participants. We sought to investigate the types (including American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics [ACMG] and non-ACMG-recommended gene lists), frequencies, and rates of SFs, as well as the effects of SF disclosure on the participants and families of a large pediatric cohort at the Center for Applied Genomics at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

METHODS

We systematically identified pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants in established disease-causing genes, adhering to ACMG v3.2 secondary finding guidelines and beyond. For non-ACMG SFs, akin to incidental findings in clinical settings, we utilized a set of criteria focusing on pediatric onset, high penetrance, moderate to severe phenotypes, and the clinical actionability of the variants. This criteria-based approach was applied rather than using a fixed gene list to ensure that the variants identified are likely to affect participant health significantly. To identify and categorize these variants, we used a clinical-grade variant classification standard per ACMG/AMP recommendations; additionally, we conducted a detailed literature search to ensure a comprehensive exploration of potential SFs relevant to pediatric participants.

RESULTS

We report a distinctive distribution of 1464 P/LP SF variants in 16,713 participants. There were 427 unique variants in ACMG genes and 265 in non-ACMG genes. The most frequently mutated genes among the ACMG and non-ACMG gene lists were TTR(41.6%) and CHEK2 (7.16%), respectively. Overall, variants of possible medical importance were found in 8.76% of participants in both ACMG (5.81%) and non-ACMG (2.95%) genes.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that 8.76% of a large, multiethnic pediatric cohort carried actionable secondary genetic findings, with 5.81% in ACMG genes and 2.95% in non-ACMG genes. These findings emphasize the importance of including diverse populations in genetic research to ensure that all groups benefit from early identification of disease risks. Our results provide a foundation for expanding the ACMG gene list and improving clinical care through early interventions.

The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants

Efforts to implement and evaluate genome sequencing (GS) as a screening tool for newborns and infants are expanding worldwide. The first iteration of the BabySeq Project (2015-2019), a randomized controlled trial of newborn sequencing, produced novel evidence on medical, behavioral, and economic outcomes. The second iteration of BabySeq, which began participant recruitment in January 2023, examines GS outcomes in a larger, more diverse cohort of more than 500 infants up to one year of age recruited from pediatric clinics at several sites across the United States. The trial aims for families who self-identify as Black/African American or Hispanic/Latino to make up more than 50% of final enrollment, and key aspects of the trial design were co-developed with a community advisory board. All enrolled families receive genetic counseling and a family history report. Half of enrolled infants are randomized to receive GS with comprehensive interpretation of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in more than 4,300 genes associated with childhood-onset and actionable adult-onset conditions, as well as larger-scale chromosomal copy number variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. GS result reports include variants associated with disease (Mendelian disease risks) and carrier status of autosomal-recessive and X-linked disorders. Investigators evaluate the utility and impacts of implementing a GS screening program in a diverse cohort of infants using medical record review and longitudinal parent surveys. In this perspective, we describe the rationale for the second iteration of the BabySeq Project, the outcomes being assessed, and the key decisions collaboratively made by the study team and community advisory board.

A national education program for rapid genomics in pediatric acute care: Building workforce confidence, competence, and capability

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate a scalable national program to build confidence, competence and capability in the use of rapid genomic testing (rGT) in the acute pediatric setting.

METHODS

We used theory-informed approaches to design a modular, adaptive program of blended learning aimed at diverse professional groups involved in acute pediatric care. The program comprised 4 online learning modules and an online workshop and was centered on case-based learning. We evaluated the program using the Kirkpatrick 4-level model of training evaluation and report our findings using the Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation (RISE2) guidelines for genomics education and evaluation.

RESULTS

Two hundred and two participants engaged with at least 1 component of the program. Participants self-reported increased confidence in using rGT, (P < .001), and quiz responses objectively demonstrated increased competence (eg, correct responses to a question on pretest counseling increased from 30% to 64%; P < .001). Additionally, their capability in applying genomic principles to simulated clinical cases increased (P < .001), as did their desire to take on more responsibility for performing rGT. The clinical interpretation of more complex test results (such as negative results or variants of uncertain significance) appeared to be more challenging, indicating a need for targeted education in this area.

CONCLUSION

The program format was effective in delivering multidisciplinary and wide-scale genomics education in the acute care context. The modular approach we have developed now lends itself to application in other medical specialties or areas of health care.

Errors in genome sequencing result disclosures: A randomized controlled trial comparing neonatology non-genetics healthcare professionals and genetic counselors

PURPOSE

We compared the rate of errors in genome sequencing (GS) result disclosures by genetic counselors (GC) and trained non-genetics healthcare professionals (NGHPs) in SouthSeq, a randomized trial utilizing GS in critically ill infants.

METHODS

Over 400 recorded GS result disclosures were analyzed for major and minor errors. We used Fisher's exact test to compare error rates between GCs and NGHPs and performed a qualitative content analysis to characterize error themes.

RESULTS

Major errors were identified in 7.5% of disclosures by NGHPs and in no disclosures by GCs. Minor errors were identified in 32.1% of disclosures by NGHPs and in 11.4% of disclosures by GCs. Although most disclosures lacked errors, NGHPs were significantly more likely to make any error than GCs for all result types (positive, negative, or uncertain). Common major error themes include omission of critical information, overstating a negative result, and overinterpreting an uncertain result. The most common minor error was failing to disclose negative secondary findings.

CONCLUSION

Trained NGHPs made clinically significant errors in GS result disclosures. Characterizing common errors in result disclosure can illuminate gaps in education to inform the development of future genomics training and alternative service delivery models.

Genomic testing and molecular diagnosis among infants with congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patterns of genetic testing among infants with CHD at a tertiary care center.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of infants in the NICU with suspicion of a genetic disorder. 1075 of 7112 infants admitted to BCH had genetic evaluation including 329 with CHD and 746 without CHD. 284 of 525 infants with CHD admitted to CMHH had genetic evaluation. Patterns of testing and diagnoses were compared.

RESULTS

The rate of diagnosis after testing was similar for infants with or without CHD (38% [121/318] vs. 36% [246/676], p = 0.14). In a multiple logistic regression, atrioventricular septal defects were most high associated with genetic diagnosis (odds ratio 29.99, 95% confidence interval 2.69-334.12, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with suspicion of a genetic disorder with CHD had similar rates of molecular diagnosis as those without CHD. These results support a role for genetic testing among NICU infants with CHD.

Diagnostic yield after next-generation sequencing in pediatric cardiovascular disease

Genetic testing with exome sequencing and genome sequencing is increasingly offered to infants and children with cardiovascular diseases. However, the rates of positive diagnoses after genetic testing within the different categories of cardiac disease and phenotypic subtypes of congenital heart disease (CHD) have been little studied. We report the diagnostic yield after next-generation sequencing in 500 patients with CHD from diverse population subgroups that were enrolled at three different sites in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium. Patients were ascertained due to a primary cardiovascular issue comprising arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and/or CHD, and corresponding human phenotype ontology terms were selected to describe the cardiac and extracardiac findings. We examined the diagnostic yield for patients with arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and/or CHD and phenotypic subtypes of CHD comprising conotruncal defects, heterotaxy, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, septal defects, and "other" heart defects. We found a significant increase in the frequency of positive findings for patients who underwent genome sequencing compared to exome sequencing and for syndromic cardiac defects compared to isolated cardiac defects. We also found significantly higher diagnostic rates for patients who presented with isolated cardiomyopathy compared to isolated CHD. For patients with syndromic presentations who underwent genome sequencing, there were significant differences in the numbers of positive diagnoses for phenotypic subcategories of CHD, ranging from 31.7% for septal defects to 60% for "other". Despite variation in the diagnostic yield at each site, our results support genetic testing in pediatric patients with syndromic and isolated cardiovascular issues and in all subtypes of CHD.

Whole genome sequencing as a first-tier diagnostic test for infants in neonatal intensive care units: A pilot study in Brazil

In this pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of whole genome sequencing (WGS) as a first-tier diagnostic test for infants hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units in the Brazilian healthcare system. The cohort presented here results from a joint collaboration between private and public hospitals in Brazil considering the initiative of a clinical laboratory to provide timely diagnosis for critically ill infants. We performed trio (proband and parents) WGS in 21 infants suspected of a genetic disease with an urgent need for diagnosis to guide medical care. Overall, the primary indication for genetic testing was dysmorphic syndromes (n = 14, 67%) followed by inborn errors of metabolism (n = 6, 29%) and skeletal dysplasias (n = 1, 5%). The diagnostic yield in our cohort was 57% (12/21) based on cases that received a definitive or likely definitive diagnostic result from WGS analysis. A total of 16 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and 10 variants of unknown significance were detected, and in most cases inherited from an unaffected parent. In addition, the reported variants were of different types, but mainly missense (58%) and associated with autosomal diseases (19/26); only three were associated with X-linked diseases, detected in hemizygosity in the proband an inherited from an unaffected mother. Notably, we identified 10 novel variants, absent from public genomic databases, in our cohort. Considering the entire diagnostic process, the average turnaround time from enrollment to medical report in our study was 53 days. Our findings demonstrate the remarkable utility of WGS as a diagnostic tool, elevating the potential of transformative impact since it outperforms conventional genetic tests. Here, we address the main challenges associated with implementing WGS in the medical care system in Brazil, as well as discuss the potential benefits and limitations of WGS as a diagnostic tool in the neonatal care setting.

Long-read genome sequencing and variant reanalysis increase diagnostic yield in neurodevelopmental disorders

Variant detection from long-read genome sequencing (lrGS) has proven to be considerably more accurate and comprehensive than variant detection from short-read genome sequencing (srGS). However, the rate at which lrGS can increase molecular diagnostic yield for rare disease is not yet precisely characterized. We performed lrGS using Pacific Biosciences "HiFi" technology on 96 short-read-negative probands with rare disease that were suspected to be genetic. We generated hg38-aligned variants and de novo phased genome assemblies, and subsequently annotated, filtered, and curated variants using clinical standards. New disease-relevant or potentially relevant genetic findings were identified in 16/96 (16.7%) probands, eight of which (8/96, 8.33%) harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. Newly identified variants were visible in both srGS and lrGS in nine probands (~9.4%) and resulted from changes to interpretation mostly from recent gene-disease association discoveries. Seven cases included variants that were only interpretable in lrGS, including copy-number variants, an inversion, a mobile element insertion, two low-complexity repeat expansions, and a 1 bp deletion. While evidence for each of these variants is, in retrospect, visible in srGS, they were either: not called within srGS data, were represented by calls with incorrect sizes or structures, or failed quality-control and filtration. Thus, while reanalysis of older data clearly increases diagnostic yield, we find that lrGS allows for substantial additional yield (7/96, 7.3%) beyond srGS. We anticipate that as lrGS analysis improves, and as lrGS datasets grow allowing for better variant frequency annotation, the additional lrGS-only rare disease yield will grow over time.

Clinical Variability in a Family with Noonan Syndrome with a Homozygous PTPN11 Gene Variant in Two Individuals

Objective

Noonan syndrome (NS) is characterized by dysmorphic facial features, short stature, congenital heart defects, and varying levels of developmental delays. It is a genetic, multisystem disorder with autosomal dominant inheritance and is the most common of the RASopathies. In approximately 50% of patients, NS is caused by variants in the Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Non-Receptor Type 11 (PTPN11) gene. The aim of this study was to evaluate two patients with a previously reported PTPN11 homozygous variant for the first time and seven other kindred members carrying the same heterozygous variant in terms of clinical, biochemical, genetic, and response to treatment.

Methods

Nine patients diagnosed with NS due to the same variants in the PTPN11 gene were included in the study.

Results

The median (range) age at diagnosis was 11.5 (6.8-13.9) years and the mean follow-up duration was 4.7 (1-7.6) years. In eight patients (88.9%), short stature was present. The height standard deviation score of the patients on admission was -3.24±1.15. In six of the patients, growth hormone treatment was initiated. Cardiovascular or bleeding disorders were not detected in any of the patients. Three (33.3%) had hearing loss, two (22.2%) had ocular findings and one (11.1%) had a horseshoe kidney. The mean psychomotor development performance score was 84.03±17.09 and the verbal score was 82.88±9.42. Genetic analysis revealed a variant in the PTPN11 gene [c.772G>A; (p.Glu258Lys)] that had been previously described and was detected in all patients. Two patients were homozygous for this variant and short stature was more severe in these two.

Conclusion

A previously described in PTPN11 affected nine members of the same kindred, two with homozygous inheritance and the remainder being heterozygous. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first homozygous PTPN11 case reports published, coming from two related consanguineous families.

Evidence review and considerations for use of first line genome sequencing to diagnose rare genetic disorders

Early use of genome sequencing (GS) in the diagnostic odyssey can reduce suffering and improve care, but questions remain about which patient populations are most amenable to GS as a first-line diagnostic test. To address this, the Medical Genome Initiative conducted a literature review to identify appropriate clinical indications for GS. Studies published from January 2011 to August 2022 that reported on the diagnostic yield (DY) or clinical utility of GS were included. An exploratory meta-analysis using a random effects model evaluated DY based on cohort size and diagnosed cases per cohort. Seventy-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising over 13,000 patients who received GS in one of the following settings: hospitalized pediatric patients, pediatric outpatients, adult outpatients, or mixed. GS was the first-line test in 38% (27/71). The unweighted mean DY of first-line GS was 45% (12-73%), 33% (6-86%) in cohorts with prior genetic testing, and 33% (9-60%) in exome-negative cohorts. Clinical utility was reported in 81% of first-line GS studies in hospitalized pediatric patients. Changes in management varied by cohort and underlying molecular diagnosis (24-100%). To develop evidence-informed points to consider, the quality of all 71 studies was assessed using modified American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria, with five core points to consider developed, including recommendations for use of GS in the N/PICU, in lieu of sequential testing and when disorders with substantial allelic heterogeneity are suspected. Future large and controlled studies in the pediatric and adult populations may support further refinement of these recommendations.

Multi-center implementation of rapid whole genome sequencing provides additional evidence of its utility in the pediatric inpatient setting

Objective

Multi-center implementation of rapid whole genome sequencing with assessment of the clinical utility of rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS), including positive, negative and uncertain results, in admitted infants with a suspected genetic disease.

Study design

rWGS tests were ordered at eight hospitals between November 2017 and April 2020. Investigators completed a survey of demographic data, Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms, test results and impacts of results on clinical care.

Results

A total of 188 patients, on general hospital floors and intensive care unit (ICU) settings, underwent rWGS testing. Racial and ethnic characteristics of the tested infants were broadly representative of births in the country at large. 35% of infants received a diagnostic result in a median of 6 days. The most common HPO terms for tested infants indicated an abnormality of the nervous system, followed by the cardiovascular system, the digestive system, the respiratory system and the head and neck. Providers indicated a major change in clinical management because of rWGS for 32% of infants tested overall and 70% of those with a diagnostic result. Also, 7% of infants with a negative rWGS result and 23% with a variant of unknown significance (VUS) had a major change in management due to testing.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that the implementation of rWGS is feasible across diverse institutions, and provides additional evidence to support the clinical utility of rWGS in a demographically representative sample of admitted infants and includes assessment of the clinical impact of uncertain rWGS results in addition to both positive and negative results.

Implementation of rapid genomic sequencing in safety-net neonatal intensive care units: protocol for the VIrtual GenOme CenteR (VIGOR) proof-of-concept study

INTRODUCTION

Rapid genomic sequencing (rGS) in critically ill infants with suspected genetic disorders has high diagnostic and clinical utility. However, rGS has primarily been available at large referral centres with the resources and expertise to offer state-of-the-art genomic care. Critically ill infants from racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations disproportionately receive care in safety-net and/or community settings lacking access to state-of-the-art genomic care, contributing to unacceptable health equity gaps. VIrtual GenOme CenteR is a 'proof-of-concept' implementation science study of an innovative delivery model for genomic care in safety-net neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We developed a virtual genome centre at a referral centre to remotely support safety-net NICU sites predominantly serving racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations and have limited to no access to rGS. Neonatal providers at each site receive basic education about genomic medicine from the study team and identify eligible infants. The study team enrols eligible infants (goal n of 250) and their parents and follows families for 12 months. Enrolled infants receive rGS, the study team creates clinical interpretive reports to guide neonatal providers on interpreting results, and neonatal providers return results to families. Data is collected via (1) medical record abstraction, (2) surveys, interviews and focus groups with neonatal providers and (3) surveys and interviews with families. We aim to examine comprehensive implementation outcomes based on the Proctor Implementation Framework using a mixed methods approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by the institutional review board of Boston Children's Hospital (IRB-P00040496) and participating sites. Participating families are required to provide electronic written informed consent and neonatal provider consent is implied through the completion of surveys. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and data will be made accessible per National Institutes of Health (NIH) policies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05205356/clinicaltrials.gov.

Gene Therapy for Genetic Syndromes: Understanding the Current State to Guide Future Care

Gene therapy holds promise as a life-changing option for individuals with genetic variants that give rise to disease. FDA-approved gene therapies for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy, β-Thalassemia, hemophilia A/B, retinal dystrophy, and Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy have generated buzz around the ability to change the course of genetic syndromes. However, this excitement risks over-expansion into areas of genetic disease that may not fit the current state of gene therapy. While in situ (targeted to an area) and ex vivo (removal of cells, delivery, and administration of cells) approaches show promise, they have a limited target ability. Broader in vivo gene therapy trials have shown various continued challenges, including immune response, use of immune suppressants correlating to secondary infections, unknown outcomes of overexpression, and challenges in driving tissue-specific corrections. Viral delivery systems can be associated with adverse outcomes such as hepatotoxicity and lethality if uncontrolled. In some cases, these risks are far outweighed by the potentially lethal syndromes for which these systems are being developed. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate the field of genetic diseases to perform cost-benefit analyses for gene therapy. In this work, we present the current state while setting forth tools and resources to guide informed directions to avoid foreseeable issues in gene therapy that could prevent the field from continued success.

Spliceosome malfunction causes neurodevelopmental disorders with overlapping features

Pre-mRNA splicing is a highly coordinated process. While its dysregulation has been linked to neurological deficits, our understanding of the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms remains limited. We implicated pathogenic variants in U2AF2 and PRPF19, encoding spliceosome subunits in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), by identifying 46 unrelated individuals with 23 de novo U2AF2 missense variants (including 7 recurrent variants in 30 individuals) and 6 individuals with de novo PRPF19 variants. Eight U2AF2 variants dysregulated splicing of a model substrate. Neuritogenesis was reduced in human neurons differentiated from human pluripotent stem cells carrying two U2AF2 hyper-recurrent variants. Neural loss of function (LoF) of the Drosophila orthologs U2af50 and Prp19 led to lethality, abnormal mushroom body (MB) patterning, and social deficits, which were differentially rescued by wild-type and mutant U2AF2 or PRPF19. Transcriptome profiling revealed splicing substrates or effectors (including Rbfox1, a third splicing factor), which rescued MB defects in U2af50-deficient flies. Upon reanalysis of negative clinical exomes followed by data sharing, we further identified 6 patients with NDD who carried RBFOX1 missense variants which, by in vitro testing, showed LoF. Our study implicates 3 splicing factors as NDD-causative genes and establishes a genetic network with hierarchy underlying human brain development and function.

Genomic medicine in neonatal care: progress and challenges

During the neonatal period, many genetic disorders present and contribute to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Genomic medicine-the use of genomic information in clinical care- has the potential to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period and improve outcomes for this population. Diagnostic genomic testing for symptomatic newborns, especially rapid testing, has been shown to be feasible and have diagnostic and clinical utility, particularly in the short-term. Ongoing studies are assessing the feasibility and utility, including personal utility, of implementation in diverse populations. Genomic screening for asymptomatic newborns has also been studied, and the acceptability and feasibility of such an approach remains an active area of investigation. Emerging precision therapies, with examples even at the "n-of-1" level, highlight the promise of precision diagnostics to lead to early intervention and improve outcomes. To sustainably implement genomic medicine in neonatal care in an ethical, effective, and equitable manner, we need to ensure access to genetics and genomics knowledge, access to genomic tests, which is currently limited by payors, feasible processes for ordering these tests, and access to follow up in the clinical and research realms. Future studies will provide further insight into enablers and barriers to optimize implementation strategies.

Heterozygous gain of function variants in a critical region of RNF13 cause congenital microcephaly, epileptic encephalopathy, blindness, and failure to thrive

Missense variants in the RNF13 gene have been previously known to cause congenital microcephaly, epileptic encephalopathy, blindness, and failure to thrive through a gain-of-function disease mechanism. Here, we identify a nonsense variant, expected to result in protein truncation, in a similarly affected patient. We show that this nonsense variant, residing in the terminal exon, is likely to escape nonsense-mediated decay while removing a critical region for protein function, thus resulting in a gain-of-function effect. We review the literature and disease databases and identify several other affected individuals with overlapping phenotypes carrying distinct truncating variants in the terminal exon upstream of the putative critical region. Furthermore, we analyze truncating variants from the general population, namely, the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), and provide additional evidence supporting our hypothesis, and ruling out haploinsufficiency as an alternative disease mechanism. In summary, our case report, literature review, and analysis of disease and population databases strongly support the hypothesis that heterozygous gain-of-function variants in a critical region of RNF13 cause congenital microcephaly, epileptic encephalopathy, blindness, and failure to thrive.

Clinical genome sequencing: Three years' experience at a tertiary children's hospital

PURPOSE

Genome sequencing (GS) may shorten the diagnostic odyssey for patients, but clinical experience with this assay in nonresearch settings remains limited. Texas Children's Hospital began offering GS as a clinical test to admitted patients in 2020, providing an opportunity to study GS utilization, possibilities for test optimization, and testing outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed GS orders for admitted patients for a nearly 3-year period from March 2020 through December 2022. We gathered anonymized clinical data from the electronic health record to answer the study questions.

RESULTS

The diagnostic yield over 97 admitted patients was 35%. The majority of GS clinical indications were neurologic or metabolic (61%) and most patients were in intensive care (58%). Tests were often characterized as candidates for intervention/improvement (56%), frequently because of redundancy with prior testing. Patients receiving GS without prior exome sequencing (ES) had higher diagnostic rates (45%) than the cohort as a whole. In 2 cases, GS revealed a molecular diagnosis that is unlikely to be detected by ES.

CONCLUSION

The performance of GS in clinical settings likely justifies its use as a first-line diagnostic test, but the incremental benefit for patients with prior ES may be limited.

Committing to genomic answers for all kids: Evaluating inequity in genomic research enrollment

PURPOSE

Persistent inequities in genomic medicine and research contribute to health disparities. This analysis uses a context-specific and equity-focused strategy to evaluate enrollment patterns for Genomic Answers for Kids (GA4K), a large, metropolitan-wide genomic study on children.

METHODS

Electronic health records for 2247 GA4K study participants were used to evaluate the distribution of individuals by demographics (race, ethnicity, and payor type) and location (residential address). Addresses were geocoded to produce point density and 3-digit zip code maps showing local and regional enrollment patterns. Health system reports and census data were used to compare participant characteristics with reference populations at different spatial scales.

RESULTS

Racial and ethnic minoritized and populations with low-income were underrepresented in the GA4K study cohort. Geographic variation demonstrates inequity in enrollment and participation among children from historically segregated and socially disadvantaged communities.

CONCLUSION

Our findings illustrate inequity in enrollment related to both GA4K study design and structural inequalities, which we suspect may exist for similar US-based studies. Our methods provide a scalable framework for continually evaluating and improving study design to ensure equitable participation in and benefits from genomic research and medicine. The use of high-resolution, place-based data represents a novel and practical means of identifying and characterizing inequities and targeting community engagement.

Meta-analysis of the diagnostic and clinical utility of exome and genome sequencing in pediatric and adult patients with rare diseases across diverse populations

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aims to compare the diagnostic and clinical utility of exome sequencing (ES) vs genome sequencing (GS) in pediatric and adult patients with rare diseases across diverse populations.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted to identify studies from 2011 to 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-one studies across 31 countries/regions were eligible, featuring 50,417 probands of diverse populations. Diagnostic rates of ES (0.38, 95% CI 0.36-0.40) and GS (0.34, 95% CI 0.30-0.38) were similar (P = .1). Within-cohort comparison illustrated 1.2-times odds of diagnosis by GS over ES (95% CI 0.79-1.83, P = .38). GS studies discovered a higher range of novel genes than ES studies; yet, the rate of variant of unknown significance did not differ (P = .78). Among high-quality studies, clinical utility of GS (0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.90) was higher than that of ES (0.44, 95% CI 0.30-0.58) (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides an important update to demonstrate the similar diagnostic rates between ES and GS and the higher clinical utility of GS over ES. With the newly published recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in noncoding regions of the genome and the trend of decreasing variant of unknown significance and GS cost, it is expected that GS will be more widely used in clinical settings.

Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing

PURPOSE

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) often result from rare genetic variation, but genomic testing yield for NDDs remains below 50%, suggesting that clinically relevant variants may be missed by standard analyses. Here, we analyze "poison exons" (PEs), which are evolutionarily conserved alternative exons often absent from standard gene annotations. Variants that alter PE inclusion can lead to loss of function and may be highly penetrant contributors to disease.

METHODS

We curated published RNA sequencing data from developing mouse cortex to define 1937 conserved PE regions potentially relevant to NDDs, and we analyzed variants found by genome sequencing in multiple NDD cohorts.

RESULTS

Across 2999 probands, we found 6 novel clinically relevant variants in PE regions. Five of these variants are in genes that are part of the sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit family (SCN1A, SCN2A, and SCN8A), which is associated with epilepsies. One variant is in SNRPB, associated with cerebrocostomandibular syndrome. These variants have moderate to high computational impact assessments, are absent from population variant databases, and in genes with gene-phenotype associations consistent with each probands reported features.

CONCLUSION

With a very minimal increase in variant analysis burden (average of 0.77 variants per proband), annotation of PEs can improve diagnostic yield for NDDs and likely other congenital conditions.

Role of genomic medicine and implementing equitable access for critically ill infants in neonatal intensive care units

Genetic disorders are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. This population has immense potential to benefit from genomic medicine, as early precision diagnosis is critical to early personalized management. However, the implementation of genomic medicine in neonatology thus far has arguably worsened health inequities, and strategies are urgently needed to achieve equitable access to genomics in neonatal care. In this perspective, we demonstrate the utility of genomic sequencing in critically ill infants and highlight three key recommendations to advance equitable access: recruitment of underrepresented populations, education of non-genetics providers to empower practice of genomic medicine, and development of innovative infrastructure to implement genomic medicine across diverse settings.

Parents' Perspectives on the Utility of Genomic Sequencing in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

It is critical to understand the wide-ranging clinical and non-clinical effects of genome sequencing (GS) for parents in the NICU context. We assessed parents' experiences with GS as a first-line diagnostic tool for infants with suspected genetic conditions in the NICU.

METHODS

Parents of newborns (N = 62) suspected of having a genetic condition were recruited across five hospitals in the southeast United States as part of the SouthSeq study. Semi-structured interviews (N = 78) were conducted after parents received their child's sequencing result (positive, negative, or variants of unknown significance). Thematic analysis was performed on all interviews.

RESULTS

Key themes included that (1) GS in infancy is important for reproductive decision making, preparing for the child's future care, ending the diagnostic odyssey, and sharing results with care providers; (2) the timing of disclosure was acceptable for most parents, although many reported the NICU environment was overwhelming; and (3) parents deny that receiving GS results during infancy exacerbated parent-infant bonding, and reported variable impact on their feelings of guilt.

CONCLUSION

Parents reported that GS during the neonatal period was useful because it provided a "backbone" for their child's care. Parents did not consistently endorse negative impacts like interference with parent-infant bonding.

Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing

Purpose

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) often result from rare genetic variation, but genomic testing yield for NDDs remains around 50%, suggesting some clinically relevant rare variants may be missed by standard analyses. Here we analyze "poison exons" (PEs) which, while often absent from standard gene annotations, are alternative exons whose inclusion results in a premature termination codon. Variants that alter PE inclusion can lead to loss-of-function and may be highly penetrant contributors to disease.

Methods

We curated published RNA-seq data from developing mouse cortex to define 1,937 PE regions conserved between humans and mice and potentially relevant to NDDs. We then analyzed variants found by genome sequencing in multiple NDD cohorts.

Results

Across 2,999 probands, we found six clinically relevant variants in PE regions that were previously overlooked. Five of these variants are in genes that are part of the sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit family ( SCN1A, SCN2A , and SCN8A ), associated with epilepsies. One variant is in SNRPB , associated with Cerebrocostomandibular Syndrome. These variants have moderate to high computational impact assessments, are absent from population variant databases, and were observed in probands with features consistent with those reported for the associated gene.

Conclusion

With only a minimal increase in variant analysis burden (most probands had zero or one candidate PE variants in a known NDD gene, with an average of 0.77 per proband), annotation of PEs can improve diagnostic yield for NDDs and likely other congenital conditions.

Return of non-ACMG recommended incidental genetic findings to pediatric patients: considerations and opportunities from experiences in genomic sequencing

BACKGROUND

The uptake of exome/genome sequencing has introduced unexpected testing results (incidental findings) that have become a major challenge for both testing laboratories and providers. While the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has outlined guidelines for laboratory management of clinically actionable secondary findings, debate remains as to whether incidental findings should be returned to patients, especially those representing pediatric populations.

METHODS

The Sequencing Analysis and Diagnostic Yield working group in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium has collected a cohort of pediatric patients found to harbor a genomic sequencing-identified non-ACMG-recommended incidental finding. The incidental variants were not thought to be associated with the indication for testing and were disclosed to patients and families.

RESULTS

In total, 23 "non-ACMG-recommended incidental findings were identified in 21 pediatric patients included in the study. These findings span four different research studies/laboratories and demonstrate differences in incidental finding return rate across study sites. We summarize specific cases to highlight core considerations that surround identification and return of incidental findings (uncertainty of disease onset, disease severity, age of onset, clinical actionability, and personal utility), and suggest that interpretation of incidental findings in pediatric patients can be difficult given evolving phenotypes. Furthermore, return of incidental findings can benefit patients and providers, but do present challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

While there may be considerable benefit to return of incidental genetic findings, these findings can be burdensome to providers and present risk to patients. It is important that laboratories conducting genomic testing establish internal guidelines in anticipation of detection. Moreover, cross-laboratory guidelines may aid in reducing the potential for policy heterogeneity across laboratories as it relates to incidental finding detection and return. However, future discussion is required to determine whether cohesive guidelines or policy statements are warranted.

Introduction to Personalized Medicine in Pediatrics

Exciting new developments in biomedical and computational sciences provide an extraordinary and unparalleled opportunity to compile, connect, and analyze multiple types of "big data," driving the development of personalized medicine. These insights must begin in early life (ie, pregnancy, neonatal, and infancy) and focus on early prevention, diagnosis, and intervention-areas of medicine where pediatricians are poised to lead the way to a personalized medicine future. The rapid growth of genomics (including pharmacogenomics), transcriptomics, and related "omics" has revolutionized the diagnosis of rare monogenic disorders. It is now clarifying the pathogenesis of complex conditions ranging from autism spectrum disorder to asthma. Collaborations between clinicians and basic scientists integrating multiomics approaches in evaluating children with severe illness are transforming the fields of perinatal, neonatal, and pediatric critical care medicine. Improvements in rapid diagnostic and prognostic information suggest that pediatric personalized medicine is under way and has an exciting future. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(10):e381-e386.].

Measures of Utility Among Studies of Genomic Medicine for Critically Ill Infants: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Genomic medicine holds promise to revolutionize care for critically ill infants by tailoring treatments for patients and providing additional prognostic information to families. However, measuring the utility of genomic medicine is not straightforward and has important clinical and ethical implications.

OBJECTIVE

To review the ways that researchers measure or neglect to measure the utility of genomic medicine for critically ill infants.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

This systematic review included prospective full-text studies of genomic medicine of both whole exome and genome sequencing in critically ill infants younger than 1 year. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the ClinicalTrials.gov register were searched with an English language restriction for articles published from the inception of each database through May 2022. Search terms included variations of the following: gene, sequencing, intensive care, critical care, and infant. From the included articles, information on how utility was defined and measured was extracted and synthesized. Information was also extracted from patient cases that authors highlighted by providing additional information. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to evaluate the association between study size and utility.

FINDINGS

Synthesized data from the 21 included studies reflected results from 1654 patients. A mean of 46% (range, 15%-72%) of patients had a positive genetic test result, and a mean of 37% (range, 13%-61%) met the criteria for experiencing utility. Despite heterogeneity in how studies measured and reported utility, a standardized framework was created with 5 categories of utility: treatment change, redirection of care, prognostic information, reproductive information, and screening or subspecialty referral. Most studies omitted important categories of utility, notably personal utility (patient-reported benefits) (20 studies [95%]), utility of negative or uncertain results (15 [71%]), and disutility (harms) (20 [95%]). Studies disproportionally highlighted patient cases that resulted in treatment change. Larger studies reported substantially lower utility (r = -0.65; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This systematic review found that genomic medicine offered various categories of utility for a substantial proportion of critically ill infants. Studies measured utility in heterogeneous ways and focused more on documenting change than assessing meaningful benefit. Authors' decisions about which cases to highlight suggest that some categories of utility may be more important than others. A more complete definition of utility that is used consistently may improve understanding of potential benefits and harms of genetic medicine.

Education and Training of Non-Genetics Providers on the Return of Genome Sequencing Results in a NICU Setting

To meet current and expected future demand for genome sequencing in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), adjustments to traditional service delivery models are necessary. Effective programs for the training of non-genetics providers (NGPs) may address the known barriers to providing genetic services including limited genetics knowledge and lack of confidence. The SouthSeq project aims to use genome sequencing to make genomic diagnoses in the neonatal period and evaluate a scalable approach to delivering genome sequencing results to populations with limited access to genetics professionals. Thirty-three SouthSeq NGPs participated in a live, interactive training intervention and completed surveys before and after participation. Here, we describe the protocol for the provider training intervention utilized in the SouthSeq study and the associated impact on NGP knowledge and confidence in reviewing, interpreting, and using genome sequencing results. Participation in the live training intervention led to an increased level of confidence in critical skills needed for real-world implementation of genome sequencing. Providers reported a significant increase in confidence level in their ability to review, understand, and use genome sequencing result reports to guide patient care. Reported barriers to implementation of genome sequencing in a NICU setting included test cost, lack of insurance coverage, and turn around time. As implementation of genome sequencing in this setting progresses, effective education of NGPs is critical to provide access to high-quality and timely genomic medicine care.