Gene selection for genomic newborn screening: Moving toward consensus?

Population-based, first-tier genomic newborn screening in the maternity ward

The rapid development of therapies for severe and rare genetic conditions underlines the need to incorporate first-tier genetic testing into newborn screening (NBS) programs. A workflow was developed to screen newborns for 165 treatable pediatric disorders by deep sequencing of regions of interest in 405 genes. The prospective observational BabyDetect pilot project was launched in September 2022 in a maternity ward of a public hospital in the Liege area, Belgium. In this ongoing observational study, 4,260 families have been informed of the project, and 3,847 consented to participate. To date, 71 disease cases have been identified, 30 of which were not detected by conventional NBS. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency was the most frequent disorder detected, with 44 positive individuals. Of the remaining 27 cases, 17 were recessive disorders. We also identified one false-positive case in a newborn in whom two variants in the AGXT gene were identified, which were subsequently shown to be located on the maternal allele. Nine heterozygous variants were identified in genes associated with dominant conditions. Results from the BabyDetect project demonstrate the importance of integrating biochemical and genomic methods in NBS programs. Challenges must be addressed in variant interpretation within a presymptomatic population and in result reporting and diagnostic confirmation.

Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs

Purpose

Over 30 international studies are exploring newborn sequencing (NBSeq) to expand the range of genetic disorders included in newborn screening. Substantial variability in gene selection across programs exists, highlighting the need for a systematic approach to prioritize genes.

Methods

We assembled a dataset comprising 25 characteristics about each of the 4,390 genes included in 27 NBSeq programs. We used regression analysis to identify several predictors of inclusion, and developed a machine learning model to rank genes for public health consideration.

Results

Among 27 NBSeq programs, the number of genes analyzed ranged from 134 to 4,299, with only 74 (1.7%) genes included by over 80% of programs. The most significant associations with gene inclusion across programs were presence on the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (inclusion increase of 74.7%, CI: 71.0%-78.4%), robust evidence on the natural history (29.5%, CI: 24.6%-34.4%) and treatment efficacy (17.0%, CI: 12.3%- 21.7%) of the associated genetic disease. A boosted trees machine learning model using 13 predictors achieved high accuracy in predicting gene inclusion across programs (AUC = 0.915, R² = 84%).

Conclusion

The machine learning model developed here provides a ranked list of genes that can adapt to emerging evidence and regional needs, enabling more consistent and informed gene selection in NBSeq initiatives.

Genomic sequencing in newborn screening: balancing consent with the right of the asymptomatic at-risk child to be found

In this paper, we explore key aspects of the complex ethical and legal landscape surrounding consent in the context of incorporating genomic sequencing into existing newborn bloodspot screening programs. In particular, we consider the potential impact of genomic sequencing on the health rights of the child in relation to existing consent practices in newborn screening. We begin with an introduction to newborn screening programs and their population health goals. We then discuss public health ethics as a rationale underpinning newborn screening before turning to consent. We go on to describe seven current research projects on genomic sequencing in newborn screening and then introduce the 'right of the asymptomatic at-risk child to be found' as a useful concept to draw on when considering consent to newborn screening. We draw on this novel right to argue for the adoption of "appropriate consent" when it comes to certain uses of genomics in newborn screening. We contend that, for 'virtual panels' at least, appropriate consent proportionately balances the ongoing universality of newborn screening for important health conditions with an acknowledgement of the complex outcomes that bringing a complicated diagnostic technology into the screening domain will generate.

International Precision Child Health Partnership (IPCHiP): an initiative to accelerate discovery and improve outcomes in rare pediatric disease

Advances in genomic technologies have revolutionized the diagnosis of rare genetic diseases, leading to the emergence of precision therapies. However, there remains significant effort ahead to ensure the promise of precision medicine translates to improved outcomes. Here, we discuss the challenges in advancing precision child health and highlight how international collaborations such as the International Precision Child Health Partnership, which embed research into clinical care, can maximize benefits for children globally.

Estimating the sensitivity of genomic newborn screening for treatable inherited metabolic disorders

PURPOSE

Over 30 research groups and companies are exploring newborn screening using genomic sequencing (NBSeq), but the sensitivity of this approach is not well understood.

METHODS

We identified individuals with treatable inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) and ascertained the proportion whose DNA analysis revealed explanatory deleterious variants (EDVs). We examined variables associated with EDV detection and estimated the sensitivity of DNA-first NBSeq. We further predicted the annual rate of true-positive and false-negative NBSeq results in the United States for several conditions on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel.

RESULTS

We identified 635 individuals with 80 unique IMDs. In univariate analyses, Black race (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.89, P = .02) and public insurance (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.91, P = .02) were less likely to be associated with finding EDVs. Had all individuals been screened with NBSeq, the sensitivity would have been 80.3%. We estimated that between 0 and 649.9 cases of Recommended Uniform Screening Panel IMDs would be missed annually by NBSeq in the United States.

CONCLUSION

The overall sensitivity of NBSeq for treatable IMDs is estimated at 80.3%. That sensitivity will likely be lower for Black infants and those who are on public insurance.

A systematic framework for selecting gene-condition pairs for inclusion in newborn sequencing panels: Early Check implementation

PURPOSE

Research is underway worldwide to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of sequencing-based newborn screening. Different methods have been used to select gene-condition pairs for screening, leading to highly inconsistent gene lists across studies.

METHODS

Early Check developed and utilized actionability-based frameworks for evaluating gene-condition pairs for inclusion in newborn panels (panel 1-high actionability, panel 2-possible actionability). A previously developed framework, the Age-based Semi Quantitative Metric (ASQM), was adapted. Increasing ASQM scores, with a maximum of 15, suggest greater actionability. Wilcoxon tests were performed to compare panel 1 gene-condition pairs on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) with non-RUSP pairs.

RESULTS

In our first round of assessment, Early Check identified 178 gene-condition pairs for inclusion in panel 1 and 29 for panel 2. Median ASQM scores of RUSP conditions on panel 1 was 12 (range 4 to 15) and non-RUSP was 13 (range 9 to 15). Median scores for panel 2 was 10 (range 6 to 14).

CONCLUSION

The Early Check frameworks provide a transparent, semiquantitative, and reproducible methodology for selecting gene-condition pairs for newborn screening sequencing pilot studies that may inform future integration of genomic sequencing into population-level newborn screening. Collaborative efforts among newborn sequencing studies to establish shared criteria is needed to enhance cross-study comparisons.

Promises and challenges of genomic newborn screening (NBS) - lessons from public health NBS programs

Newborn screening (NBS) in the United States began in the 1960s to detect inborn errors of metabolism that benefited from presymptomatic treatment compared with treatment after the development of symptoms and diagnosis. Over time, it expanded to include endocrinological disorders, hematological disorders, immunodeficiencies, and other treatable diseases such as lysosomal storage diseases (LSD), cystic fibrosis, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, and spinal muscular dystrophy. This expansion has been driven by new technologies (e.g., tandem mass spectrometry) and novel treatments (e.g., enzyme replacement therapy and stem cell transplant for LSDs). Advances in next-generation gene sequencing (NGS) enable rapid identification of many additional conditions that might benefit from early presymptomatic intervention. We review the NGS technologies that evolved as diagnostic testing and suggest issues to be resolved before their potential application to screening the asymptomatic population. We illustrate the importance of selecting diseases to be screened and propose recommendations to follow when variants of uncertain significance are found. We address ethical issues around achieving equity in the sensitivity of genomic NBS, access to follow-up and management, especially for people from diverse backgrounds, and other considerations. Finally, we discuss the potential benefits and harms of genomic NBS to the overall health of children with monogenic diseases. IMPACT: Genomic newborn screening programs are ongoing worldwide. Public discussion is needed as to whether genomic newborn screening should be offered as a public health program and, if so, what conditions should be screened for. Providers should understand that the sensitivity of genomic newborn screening is especially low for newborns from non-European populations. Methylation, large structural variants and repeat expansion variants are not amenable to next-generation sequencing-based genomic newborn screening. The article serves as a comprehensive guide to understanding issues that need to be solved before genomic newborn screening is implemented as a public health program.

Epigenomic newborn screening for conditions with intellectual disability and autistic features in Australian newborns

This study describes a protocol to assess a novel workflow called Epi-Genomic Newborn Screening (EpiGNs) on 100,000 infants from the state of Victoria, Australia. The workflow uses a first-tier screening approach called methylation-specific quantitative melt analysis (MS-QMA), followed by second and third tier testing including targeted methylation and copy number variation analyzes with droplet digital PCR, EpiTYPER system and low-coverage whole genome sequencing. EpiGNs utilizes only two 3.2 mm newborn blood spot punches to screen for genetic conditions, including fragile X syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, Angelman syndrome, Dup15q syndrome and sex chromosome aneuploidies. The program aims to: identify clinically actionable methylation screening thresholds for the first-tier screen and estimate prevalence for the conditions screened.

Wilson and Jungner Revisited: Are Screening Criteria Fit for the 21st Century?

Driven by technological innovations, newborn screening (NBS) panels have been expanded and the development of genomic NBS pilot programs is rapidly progressing. Decisions on disease selection for NBS are still based on the Wilson and Jungner (WJ) criteria published in 1968. Despite this uniform reference, interpretation of the WJ criteria and actual disease selection for NBS programs are highly variable. A systematic literature search [PubMED search "Wilson" AND "Jungner"; last search 16.07.22] was performed to evaluate the applicability of the WJ criteria for current and future NBS programs and the need for adaptation. By at least two reviewers, 105 publications (systematic literature search, N = 77; manual search, N = 28) were screened for relevant content and, finally, 38 publications were evaluated. Limited by the study design of qualitative text analysis, no statistical evaluation was performed, but a structured collection of reported aspects of criticism and proposed improvements was instead collated. This revealed a set of general limitations of the WJ criteria, such as imprecise terminology, lack of measurability and objectivity, missing pediatric focus, and absent guidance on program management. Furthermore, it unraveled specific aspects of criticism on clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic, and economical aspects. A major obstacle was found to be the incompletely understood natural history and phenotypic diversity of rare diseases prior to NBS implementation, resulting in uncertainty about case definition, risk stratification, and indications for treatment. This gap could be closed through the systematic collection and evaluation of real-world evidence on the quality, safety, and (cost-)effectiveness of NBS, as well as the long-term benefits experienced by screened individuals. An integrated NBS public health program that is designed to continuously learn would fulfil these requirements, and a multi-dimensional framework for future NBS programs integrating medical, ethical, legal, and societal perspectives is overdue.

Clues for Early Diagnosis of MEN2B Syndrome Before Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

Early onset medullary thyroid carcinoma, later pheochromocytomas, and nonspecific extra-endocrine features (hypermobility and persistent constipation) are part of the clinical phenotype of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 2B (MEN2B). A de novo pathogenic M918T variant in the rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene is usually identified. Affected children are often seen by multiple clinicians over a long period before consideration of a diagnosis of MEN2B, with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma often the precipitator. We describe the clinical presentation and course of 5 children ultimately diagnosed with MEN2B in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory, Australia between 1989 and 2021. All cases had intestinal ganglioneuromatosis that could have prompted an earlier diagnosis. Population wide newborn genomic screening for rare diseases is on the horizon. We propose that MEN2B genomic screening should be included in newborn screening programs and that careful exclusion of intestinal ganglioneuromatosis would allow earlier identification leading to improved clinical outcomes.

Comparative analysis of gene and disease selection in genomic newborn screening studies

Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) is on the horizon given the decreasing costs of sequencing and the advanced understanding of the impact of genetic variants on health and diseases. Key to ongoing gNBS pilot studies is the selection of target diseases and associated genes to be included. In this study, we present a comprehensive analysis of seven published gene-disease lists from gNBS studies, evaluating gene-disease count, composition, group proportions, and ClinGen curations of individual disorders. Despite shared selection criteria, we observe substantial variation in total gene count (median 480, range 237-889) and disease group composition. An intersection was identified for 53 genes, primarily inherited metabolic diseases (83%, 44/53). Each study investigated a subset of exclusive gene-disease pairs, and the total number of exclusive gene-disease pairs was positively correlated with the total number of genes included per study. While most pairs receive "Definitive" or "Strong" ClinGen classifications, some are labeled as "Refuted" (n = 5) or "Disputed" (n = 28), particularly in genetic cardiac diseases. Importantly, 17%-48% of genes lack ClinGen curation. This study underscores the current absence of consensus recommendations for selection criteria for target diseases for gNBS resulting in diversity in proposed gene-disease pairs, their coupling with gene variations and the use of ClinGen curation. Our findings provide crucial insights into the selection of target diseases and accompanying gene variations for future gNBS program, emphasizing the necessity for ongoing collaboration and discussion about criteria harmonization for panel selection to ensure the screening's objectivity, integrity, and broad acceptance.

The Multi-Omic Approach to Newborn Screening: Opportunities and Challenges

Newborn screening programs have seen significant evolution since their initial implementation more than 60 years ago, with the primary goal of detecting treatable conditions within the earliest possible timeframe to ensure the optimal treatment and outcomes for the newborn. New technologies have driven the expansion of screening programs to cover additional conditions. In the current era, the breadth of screened conditions could be further expanded by integrating omic technologies such as untargeted metabolomics and genomics. Genomic screening could offer opportunities for lifelong care beyond the newborn period. For genomic newborn screening to be effective and ready for routine adoption, it must overcome barriers such as implementation cost, public acceptability, and scalability. Metabolomics approaches, on the other hand, can offer insight into disease phenotypes and could be used to identify known and novel biomarkers of disease. Given recent advances in metabolomic technologies, alongside advances in genomics including whole-genome sequencing, the combination of complementary multi-omic approaches may provide an exciting opportunity to leverage the best of both approaches and overcome their respective limitations. These techniques are described, along with the current outlook on multi-omic-based NBS research.

Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023)

Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) began in the early 1960s based on the work of Dr. Robert "Bob" Guthrie in Buffalo, NY, USA. His development of a screening test for phenylketonuria on blood absorbed onto a special filter paper and transported to a remote testing laboratory began it all. Expansion of NBS to large numbers of asymptomatic congenital conditions flourishes in many settings while it has not yet been realized in others. The need for NBS as an efficient and effective public health prevention strategy that contributes to lowered morbidity and mortality wherever it is sustained is well known in the medical field but not necessarily by political policy makers. Acknowledging the value of national NBS reports published in 2007, the authors collaborated to create a worldwide NBS update in 2015. In a continuing attempt to review the progress of NBS globally, and to move towards a more harmonized and equitable screening system, we have updated our 2015 report with information available at the beginning of 2024. Reports on sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean, missing in 2015, have been included. Tables popular in the previous report have been updated with an eye towards harmonized comparisons. To emphasize areas needing attention globally, we have used regional tables containing similar listings of conditions screened, numbers of screening laboratories, and time at which specimen collection is recommended. Discussions are limited to bloodspot screening.

Prospective cohort study of genomic newborn screening: BabyScreen+ pilot study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is a highly successful public health programme that uses biochemical and other assays to screen for severe but treatable childhood-onset conditions. Introducing genomic sequencing into NBS programmes increases the range of detectable conditions but raises practical and ethical issues. Evidence from prospectively ascertained cohorts is required to guide policy and future implementation. This study aims to develop, implement and evaluate a genomic NBS (gNBS) pilot programme.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The BabyScreen+ study will pilot gNBS in three phases. In the preimplementation phase, study materials, including education resources, decision support and data collection tools, will be designed. Focus groups and key informant interviews will also be undertaken to inform delivery of the study and future gNBS programmes. During the implementation phase, we will prospectively recruit birth parents in Victoria, Australia, to screen 1000 newborns for over 600 severe, treatable, childhood-onset conditions. Clinically accredited whole genome sequencing will be performed following standard NBS using the same sample. High chance results will be returned by genetic healthcare professionals, with follow-on genetic and other confirmatory testing and referral to specialist services as required. The postimplementation phase will evaluate the feasibility of gNBS as the primary aim, and assess ethical, implementation, psychosocial and health economic factors to inform future service delivery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This project received ethics approval from the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne Research Ethics Committee: HREC/91500/RCHM-2023, HREC/90929/RCHM-2022 and HREC/91392/RCHM-2022. Findings will be disseminated to policy-makers, and through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.