High cost patients for cardiac surgery and hospital quality in Turkey

Concentration of High-Cost Head and Neck Cancer Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVE

Health care costs are disproportionately concentrated among a small number of patients. We sought to identify variables associated with high-cost patients and high hospital concentration of high-cost patients and to examine associations with short-term outcomes in head and neck cancer (HNCA) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify 170,577 patients who underwent HNCA surgery in 2001-2011. High-cost patients were defined as patients whose costs of care were in the top decile, and high-concentration hospitals were defined as those whose percentage of high-cost patients was in the top decile.

METHODS

Multivariable regression was used to evaluate associations between cost and patient and hospital variables, postoperative complications, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Costs associated with high-cost patients were 4.47-fold greater than the remaining 90% of patients. High-concentration hospitals treated 36% of all high-cost patients. High-cost patients were more likely to be non-white (OR = 2.08 [1.45-2.97]), have oral cavity cancer (OR = 1.21 [1.05-1.39]), advanced comorbidity (OR = 1.53 [1.31-1.77]), Medicaid (OR = 1.93 [1.62-2.31]) or self-pay payor status (OR = 1.72 [1.38-2.14]), income>50th percentile (OR = 1.25 [1.05-1.51]), undergo major procedures (OR = 3.52 [3.07-4.05]) and have non-routine discharge (OR = 7.50 [6.01-9.35]). High-concentration hospitals were more likely to be teaching hospitals (OR = 3.14 [1.64-6.05]) and less likely to be urban (OR = 0.20 [0.04-0.93]). After controlling for all other variables, high-cost patients were associated with an increased odds of mortality (OR = 8.00 [5.89-10.85]) and postoperative complications (OR = 5.88 [5.18-6.68]). High-concentration hospitals were associated with an increased odds of postoperative complications (OR = 1.31 [1.08-1.61]) but were not associated with increased mortality (OR = 0.98 [0.67-1.44]).

CONCLUSIONS

High-cost HNCA surgical patients are associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, and are disproportionately concentrated at teaching hospitals.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:4971-4978, 2024.

Burden of Ischemic Heart Disease and Its Attributable Risk Factors in North Africa and the Middle East, 1990 to 2019: Results From the GBD Study 2019

BACKGROUND

The North Africa and Middle East (NAME) region has one of the highest burdens of ischemic heart disease (IHD) worldwide. This study reports the contemporary epidemiology of IHD in NAME.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We estimated the incidence, prevalence, deaths, years of life lost, years lived with disability, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and premature mortality of IHD, and its attributable risk factors in NAME from 1990 to 2019 using the results of the GBD (Global Burden of Disease study 2019). In 2019, 0.8 million lives and 18.0 million DALYs were lost due to IHD in NAME. From 1990 to 2019, the age-standardized DALY rate of IHD significantly decreased by 33.3%, mostly due to the reduction of years of life lost rather than years lived with disability. In 2019, the proportion of premature death attributable to IHD was higher in NAME compared with global measures: 26.8% versus 16.9% for women and 18.4% versus 14.8% for men, respectively. The age-standardized DALY rate of IHD attributed to metabolic risks, behavioral risks, and environmental/occupational risks significantly decreased by 28.7%, 37.8%, and 36.4%, respectively. Dietary risk factors, high systolic blood pressure, and high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were the top 3 risks contributing to the IHD burden in most countries of NAME in 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2019, IHD was the leading cause of death and lost DALYs in NAME, where premature death due to IHD was greater than the global average. Despite the great reduction in the age-standardized DALYs of IHD in NAME from 1990 to 2019, this region still had the second-highest burden of IHD in 2019 globally.

The effects of Nurse Led Transitional Care Model on elderly patients undergoing open heart surgery: a randomized controlled trial

AIMS 

Rate and number of successful cases in open heart surgery has been increasing due to the advances in medical technology and surgery. To improve patient convalescence results and reduce rate of post-discharge readmission to hospital and unplanned post-discharge rehospitalization, home-care and follow-up process of patients should be managed successfully. To evaluate the effectiveness of Nurse Led Transitional Care Model on the functional autonomy, quality of life, readmission, and rehospitalization rates of elderly patients undergoing open heart surgery. A randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2017 to December 2018 and performed according to the CONSORT Guidelines.

METHODS AND RESULTS 

Sixty-six elderly patients were randomly allocated to the intervention (n: 33) and control (n: 33) groups. Patients in intervention group were given care based on the Transitional Care Model until the post-discharge 9th week starting from date of hospitalization. Patients in control group were given standard care services. Functional autonomy, quality of life levels, and repeated admission/re-hospitalization rates to the clinic were evaluated. The Functional Autonomy Measurement System and SF-36 Quality of Life Scale scores of the intervention group were higher than that of the control group at the 9th week (P < 0.05). In addition, rate of readmission and rehospitalization during the follow-up period (6 months) of patients in the intervention group was found to be lower than the patients in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION 

Care services offered under the Transitional Care Model improved functional autonomy and quality of life and decreased post-discharge hospital readmission and rehospitalization rates of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04384289).

Economic Impact and Complications of Treated and Untreated Hepatitis C Virus Patients in Turkey

BACKGROUND

According to the Turkish Ministry of Health's guidelines, standard double therapy, a combination of pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin, was the only treatment option for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection until the end of 2011.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to compare risk-adjusted clinical and economic outcomes between treated and untreated patients with HCV infection.

METHODS

Patients with HCV infection were identified from the Turkish National Health Insurance Database (2009-2011) using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The first prescription date was designated as the index date. Mortality and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) rates and health care costs of treated and untreated patients were compared using propensity score matching. Baseline demographic and clinical factors were controlled in the models. Subgroup analysis was conducted for patient groups with and without a cirrhosis diagnosis.

RESULTS

Out of 12,990 patients included in the study, 1,583 were treated for HCV infection. Out of 2,467 patients who had a cirrhosis diagnosis, 231 were treated, whereas out of 10,523 patients without cirrhosis, 1,352 patients were treated. Treated patients were younger, less likely to be diagnosed with comorbid conditions, and less likely to reside in Central or Eastern Anatolia. After adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical factors, mortality (2.27% vs. 5.31%; P < 0.001) and HCC rates (0.69% vs. 1.96%; P < 0.001) were found to be lower for treated patients. Differences were more significant among patients diagnosed with cirrhosis. Treated patients incurred higher risk-adjusted annual costs (€6172 vs. €1680; P < 0.001), mainly because of pharmaceutical costs (€4918 vs. €583; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection treatment, although costly, significantly reduces mortality and HCC rates in Turkey.

Retrospective analysis of total direct medical costs associated with hepatitis B patients with oral antiviral versus pegylated interferon therapy in Turkey

To explore healthcare costs associated with antiviral treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in Turkey. Research-identified data from a claims processing system for all Turkish health insurance funds were analysed. Adult patients prescribed oral antiviral and pegylated interferon treatment were identified between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2010. The first prescription date was defined as the index date. Patients were required to have HBV diagnosis within the 6-month pre-index period. Pharmacy, outpatient and inpatient claims were compiled over the study period for the selected patients, and risk-adjusted 1-year healthcare costs of patients with oral antiviral and pegylated interferon treatment were compared. Risk adjustment was carried out using propensity score matching, controlling for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. A total of 9618 patients were identified, of which 9074 were treated with oral antiviral medication and 544 with pegylated interferon medication. The oral antiviral treatment group was older (45.28 vs 42.19, P < 0.001), less likely to be female (32.17% vs 39.71%, P < 0.001) and to reside in Southeastern Anatolia (8.29% vs 13.97%, P < 0.001) or Mediterranean region (8.90% vs 11.76%, P < 0.03) and had higher Elixhauser comorbidity index scores (60.22% vs 74.08%, P < 0.001) than the pegylated interferon group. After adjusting for confounding factors, total medical costs for pegylated interferon patients were €2771 higher than for oral antiviral patients (P < 0.001), due to higher outpatient and prescription costs. For annual healthcare costs for antiviral treatment options for HBV patients in Turkey, after adjusting for age, gender, region and comorbid condition differences, oral antiviral treatment is more costly than pegylated interferon treatment.