AI in patient flow: applications of artificial intelligence to improve patient flow in NHS acute mental health inpatient units

The impact of AI-based decision support systems on nursing workflows in critical care units

AIM

This research examines the effects of artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support systems (DSS) on the operational processes of nurses in critical care units (CCU) located in Amman, Jordan.

BACKGROUND

The deployment of AI technology within the healthcare sector presents substantial opportunities for transforming patient care, with a particular emphasis on the field of nursing.

METHOD

This paper examines how AI-based DSS affect CCU nursing workflows in Amman, Jordan, using a cross-sectional analysis. A study group of 112 registered nurses was enlisted throughout a research period spanning one month. Data were gathered using surveys that specifically examined several facets of nursing workflows, the employment of AI, encountered problems, and the sufficiency of training.

RESULT

The findings indicate a varied demographic composition among the participants, with notable instances of AI technology adoption being reported. Nurses have the perception that there are favorable effects on time management, patient monitoring, and clinical decision-making. However, they continue to face persistent hurdles, including insufficient training, concerns regarding data privacy, and technical difficulties.

DISCUSSION

The study highlights the significance of thorough training programs and supportive mechanisms to improve nurses' involvement with AI technologies and maximize their use in critical care environments. Although there are differing degrees of contentment with existing AI systems, there is a general agreement on the necessity of ongoing enhancement and fine-tuning to optimize their efficacy in enhancing patient care results.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND/OR HEALTH POLICY

This research provides essential knowledge about the intricacies of incorporating AI into nursing practice, highlighting the significance of tackling obstacles to guarantee the ethical and efficient use of AI technology in healthcare.

A Scoping Review of AI-Driven Digital Interventions in Mental Health Care: Mapping Applications Across Screening, Support, Monitoring, Prevention, and Clinical Education

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled digital interventions are increasingly used to expand access to mental health care. This PRISMA-ScR scoping review maps how AI technologies support mental health care across five phases: pre-treatment (screening), treatment (therapeutic support), post-treatment (monitoring), clinical education, and population-level prevention.

METHODS

We synthesized findings from 36 empirical studies published through January 2024 that implemented AI-driven digital tools, including large language models (LLMs), machine learning (ML) models, and conversational agents. Use cases include referral triage, remote patient monitoring, empathic communication enhancement, and AI-assisted psychotherapy delivered via chatbots and voice agents.

RESULTS

Across the 36 included studies, the most common AI modalities included chatbots, natural language processing tools, machine learning and deep learning models, and large language model-based agents. These technologies were predominantly used for support, monitoring, and self-management purposes rather than as standalone treatments. Reported benefits included reduced wait times, increased engagement, and improved symptom tracking. However, recurring challenges such as algorithmic bias, data privacy risks, and workflow integration barriers highlight the need for ethical design and human oversight.

CONCLUSION

By introducing a four-pillar framework, this review offers a comprehensive overview of current applications and future directions in AI-augmented mental health care. It aims to guide researchers, clinicians, and policymakers in developing safe, effective, and equitable digital mental health interventions.

Artificial intelligence in stroke rehabilitation: From acute care to long-term recovery

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, driving the need for advanced rehabilitation strategies. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into stroke rehabilitation presents significant advancements across the continuum of care, from acute diagnosis to long-term recovery. This review explores AI's role in stroke rehabilitation, highlighting its impact on early diagnosis, motor recovery, and cognitive rehabilitation. AI-driven imaging techniques, such as deep learning applied to CT and MRI scans, improve early diagnosis and identify ischemic penumbra, enabling timely, personalized interventions. AI-assisted decision support systems optimize acute stroke treatment, including thrombolysis and endovascular therapy. In motor rehabilitation, AI-powered robotics and exoskeletons provide precise, adaptive assistance, while AI-augmented Virtual and Augmented Reality environments offer immersive, tailored recovery experiences. Brain-Computer Interfaces utilize AI for neurorehabilitation through neural signal processing, supporting motor recovery. Machine learning models predict functional recovery outcomes and dynamically adjust therapy intensities. Wearable technologies equipped with AI enable continuous monitoring and real-time feedback, facilitating home-based rehabilitation. AI-driven tele-rehabilitation platforms overcome geographic barriers by enabling remote assessment and intervention. The review also addresses the ethical, legal, and regulatory challenges associated with AI implementation, including data privacy and technical integration. Future research directions emphasize the transformative potential of AI in stroke rehabilitation, with case studies and clinical trials illustrating the practical benefits and efficacy of AI technologies in improving patient recovery.

Mental health practitioners' perceptions and adoption intentions of AI-enabled technologies: an international mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

As mental health disorders continue to surge, exceeding the capacity of available therapeutic resources, the emergence of technologies enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising solutions for supporting and delivering patient care. However, there is limited research on mental health practitioners' understanding, familiarity, and adoption intentions regarding these AI technologies. We, therefore, examined to what extent practitioners' characteristics are associated with their learning and use intentions of AI technologies in four application domains (diagnostics, treatment, feedback, and practice management). These characteristics include medical AI readiness with its subdimensions, AI anxiety with its subdimensions, technology self-efficacy, affinity for technology interaction, and professional identification.

METHODS

Mixed-methods data from N = 392 German and US practitioners, encompassing psychotherapists (in training), psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists, was analyzed. A deductive thematic approach was employed to evaluate mental health practitioners' understanding and familiarity with AI technologies. Additionally, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the relationship between practitioners' characteristics and their adoption intentions for different technologies.

RESULTS

Qualitative analysis unveiled a substantial gap in familiarity with AI applications in mental healthcare among practitioners. While some practitioner characteristics were only associated with specific AI application areas (e.g., cognitive readiness with learning intentions for feedback tools), we found that learning intention, ethical knowledge, and affinity for technology interaction were relevant across all four application areas, underscoring their relevance in the adoption of AI technologies in mental healthcare.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this pre-registered study underscores the importance of recognizing the interplay between diverse factors for training opportunities and consequently, a streamlined implementation of AI-enabled technologies in mental healthcare.

Subtyping Service Receipt in Personality Disorder Services in South London: Observational Validation Study Using Latent Profile Analysis

BACKGROUND

Personality disorders (PDs) are typically associated with higher mental health service use; however, individual patterns of engagement among patients with complex needs are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to identify subgroups of individuals based on patterns of service receipt in secondary mental health services and examine how routinely collected information is associated with these subgroups.

METHODS

A sample of 3941 patients diagnosed with a personality disorder and receiving care from secondary services in South London was identified using health care records covering an 11-year period from 2007 to 2018. Basic demographic information, service use, and treatment data were included in the analysis. Service use measures included the number of contacts with clinical teams and instances of did-not-attend.

RESULTS

Using a large sample of 3941 patients with a diagnosis of PD, latent profile analysis identified 2 subgroups characterized by low and high service receipt, denoted as profile 1 (n=2879, 73.05%) and profile 2 (n=1062, 26.95%), respectively. A 2-profile solution (P<.01) was preferred over a 3-profile solution, which was nonsignificant. In unconditional (t3941,3939=19.53; P<.001; B=7.27; 95% CI 6.54-8) and conditional (t3941,3937=-3.31; P<.001; B=-74.94; 95% CI -119.34 to -30.56) models, cluster membership was significantly related to receipt of nursing contacts, over and above other team contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that routinely collected data may be used to classify likely engagement subtypes among patients with complex needs. The algorithm identified factors associated with service use and has the potential to inform clinical decision-making to improve treatment for individuals with complex needs.

Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: From the Lens of Clinicians and Patients

Much work has been published on artificial intelligence (AI) and oncology, with many focusing on an algorithm perspective. However, very few perspective articles have explicitly discussed the role of AI in oncology from the perspectives of the stakeholders-the clinicians and the patients. In this article, we delve into the opportunities of AI in oncology from the clinician's and patient's lens. From the clinician's perspective, we discuss reducing burnout, enhancing decision making, and leveraging vast data sets to provide evidence-based recommendations, eventually affecting diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. From the patient's perspective, we discuss AI virtual concierge, which could improve the cancer care journey by facilitating patient education, mental health support, and personalized lifestyle wellness recommendations promoting a holistic approach to care. We aim to highlight the stakeholders' unmet needs and guide institutions to create innovative AI solutions in oncology. By addressing these perspectives, our article aims to bridge the gap between technological research advancements and their real-world AI-focused clinical applications in cancer care. Understanding and prioritizing the needs of the stakeholders will foster the development of impactful AI tools and intentional utilization of such technology, with an aim for clinical implementation and integration into workflows.

Evaluation of Awareness, Perception and Opinions Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Pharmacy Students

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) helps to develop personalized medication therapy and regimens. It improves the patient care system. A cross-sectional study used and included pharmacy students, using validated survey questions. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate awareness, perception and opinion toward AI among pharmacy students. Design: This is a cross-sectional study (survey-based). Methods: A cross-sectional survey distribution among students in different levels of the college of pharmacy at National University (NU). The questions were classified to measure the variation of demographics, awareness, perceptions and opinions toward Artificial Intelligence (AI). Results: The results showed that more than 50% of pharmacy students are familiar with the uses of AI and know it's important in scientific research, 46.4% have a basic understanding of AI technologies. However more than 75% don't know the applications of AI used in pharmacy practice, 50.6 % don't know AI can support therapeutic diagnosis and 57 % don't know its importance in pharmacy education. A high perception was shown toward AI in facilitating pharmacy access to information (84.2%) and patients' access to the service (80.8%). In addition, 92% suggested that AI training is needed and 86.1 % recommended using AI in scientific research. The conclusion of this study identified the needs for awareness toward AI, and the important role of AI for education in pharmacy and health communities.

Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) systems for automating medical history taking and triage can significantly enhance patient flow in health care systems. Despite the promising performance of numerous AI studies, only a limited number of these systems have been successfully integrated into routine health care practice. To elucidate how AI systems can create value in this context, it is crucial to identify the current state of knowledge, including the readiness of these systems, the facilitators of and barriers to their implementation, and the perspectives of various stakeholders involved in their development and deployment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to map and summarize empirical research on AI systems designed for automating medical history taking and triage in health care settings.

METHODS

The study was conducted following the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A comprehensive search of 5 databases-PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science-was performed. A detailed protocol was established before the review to ensure methodological rigor.

RESULTS

A total of 1248 research publications were identified and screened. Of these, 86 (6.89%) met the eligibility criteria. Notably, most (n=63, 73%) studies were published between 2020 and 2022, with a significant concentration on emergency care (n=32, 37%). Other clinical contexts included radiology (n=12, 14%) and primary care (n=6, 7%). Many (n=15, 17%) studies did not specify a clinical context. Most (n=31, 36%) studies used retrospective designs, while others (n=34, 40%) did not specify their methodologies. The predominant type of AI system identified was the hybrid model (n=68, 79%), with forecasting (n=40, 47%) and recognition (n=36, 42%) being the most common tasks performed. While most (n=70, 81%) studies included patient populations, only 1 (1%) study investigated patients' views on AI-based medical history taking and triage, and 2 (2%) studies considered health care professionals' perspectives. Furthermore, only 6 (7%) studies validated or demonstrated AI systems in relevant clinical settings through real-time model testing, workflow implementation, clinical outcome evaluation, or integration into practice. Most (n=76, 88%) studies were concerned with the prototyping, development, or validation of AI systems. In total, 4 (5%) studies were reviews of several empirical studies conducted in different clinical settings. The facilitators and barriers to AI system implementation were categorized into 4 themes: technical aspects, contextual and cultural considerations, end-user engagement, and evaluation processes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights current trends, stakeholder perspectives, stages of innovation development, and key influencing factors related to implementing AI systems in health care. The identified literature gaps regarding stakeholder perspectives and the limited research on AI systems for automating medical history taking and triage indicate significant opportunities for further investigation and development in this evolving field.

Application of artificial intelligence in nursing practice: a qualitative study of Jordanian nurses' perspectives

BACKGROUND

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in healthcare to boost productivity, reduce administrative workloads, and improve patient outcomes. In nursing, AI offers both opportunities and challenges. This study explores nurses' perspectives on implementing AI in nursing practice within the context of Jordan, focusing on the perceived benefits and concerns related to its integration.

METHOD

A qualitative research approach was employed, involving semi-structured interviews with 25 nurses and 3 focus group discussions, each consisting of 7-8 participants. The data collected was coded and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and key themes in the nurses' views on AI.

RESULTS

Three major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) AI as an efficiency tool - Nurses recognized AI's ability to reduce administrative burdens and improve patient monitoring in real-time. (2) Ethical and practical concerns - Nurses raised issues regarding patient privacy, data security, and the fear that AI might replace human decision-making in care. (3) Lack of preparedness and training - There was a consensus on nurses' inadequate training in AI tools, limiting their ability to integrate AI into their practice fully.

CONCLUSION

While AI is seen as a valuable tool to enhance nursing productivity, several challenges still need to be addressed, particularly regarding ethical concerns and insufficient training. To ensure AI complements nursing without compromising the human element, healthcare institutions must address these issues by implementing comprehensive training programs and establishing clear ethical guidelines.

Access improvement in healthcare: a 12-step framework for operational practice

Background

Access improvement is a fundamental component of value-based healthcare as it inherently promotes quality by eliminating chokepoints, redundancies, and inefficiencies which could hinder the provisioning of timely care. The purpose of this review is to present a 12-step framework which offers healthcare organizations a practical, thematic-based foundation for thinking about access improvement.

Methods

This study was designed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. A literature search of prospective peer-reviewed publications was undertaken to identify studies pertaining to healthcare access. Articles published from January 2014 to January 2024 were included. An interpretive synthesis was then presented.

Results

A total of 469 peer-reviewed studies were identified. The most common diseases analyzed were related to general medicine/family practice (N = 75), surgical care (N = 51), health screening (N = 30), mental health (N = 27), cardiovascular disease (N = 17), emergency room/critical care (N = 15), and cancer (N = 7). The remaining 247 studies (53%) did not specifically report on any specialization. The core themes could be broadly categorized into the following: workforce adequacy, patient experience, physical space utilization, template optimization, scheduling efficiency, process standardization, cost transparency, physician engagement, and data analytics. Sixty publications (13%) focused at least in part on equity issues, structural racism, and/or implicit bias; and 25 publications (5%) addressed disparities in education, training, and/or technical literacy. Seventy-three publications (16%) focused either completely or in part on digital health as a means of access improvement.

Conclusion

Based on this systematic review, a 12-step thematically based framework for approaching access improvement in healthcare was developed.

Healthcare Professionals' Views on the Use of Passive Sensing and Machine Learning Approaches in Secondary Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION

Globally, many people experience mental health difficulties, and the current workforce capacity is insufficient to meet this demand, with growth not keeping pace with need. Digital devices that passively collect data and utilise machine learning to generate insights could enhance current mental health practices and help service users manage their mental health. However, little is known about mental healthcare professionals' perspectives on these approaches. This study aims to explore mental health professionals' views on using digital devices to passively collect data and apply machine learning in mental healthcare, as well as the potential barriers and facilitators to their implementation in practice.

METHODS

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 multidisciplinary staff who work in secondary mental health settings. Interview topics included the use of digital devices for passive sensing, developing machine learning algorithms from this data, the clinician's role, and the barriers and facilitators to their use in practice. Interview data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants noted that digital devices for healthcare can motivate and empower users, but caution is needed to prevent feelings of abandonment and widening inequalities. Passive sensing can enhance assessment objectivity, but it raises concerns about privacy, data storage, consent and data accuracy. Machine learning algorithms may increase awareness of support needs, yet lack context, risking misdiagnosis. Barriers for service users include access, accessibility and the impact of receiving insights from passively collected data. For staff, barriers involve infrastructure and increased workload. Staff support facilitated service users' adoption of digital systems, while for staff, training, ease of use and feeling supported were key enablers.

CONCLUSIONS

Several recommendations have arisen from this study, including ensuring devices are user-friendly and equitably applied in clinical practice. Being with a blended approach to prevent service users from feeling abandoned and provide staff with training and access to technology to enhance uptake.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The study design, protocol and topic guide were informed by a lived experience community group that advises on research projects at the authors' affiliation.

A systematic literature review of predicting patient discharges using statistical methods and machine learning

Discharge planning is integral to patient flow as delays can lead to hospital-wide congestion. Because a structured discharge plan can reduce hospital length of stay while enhancing patient satisfaction, this topic has caught the interest of many healthcare professionals and researchers. Predicting discharge outcomes, such as destination and time, is crucial in discharge planning by helping healthcare providers anticipate patient needs and resource requirements. This article examines the literature on the prediction of various discharge outcomes. Our review discovered papers that explore the use of prediction models to forecast the time, volume, and destination of discharged patients. Of the 101 reviewed papers, 49.5% looked at the prediction with machine learning tools, and 50.5% focused on prediction with statistical methods. The fact that knowing discharge outcomes in advance affects operational, tactical, medical, and administrative aspects is a frequent theme in the papers studied. Furthermore, conducting system-wide optimization, predicting the time and destination of patients after discharge, and addressing the primary causes of discharge delay in the process are among the recommendations for further research in this field.

Self-Administered Interventions Based on Natural Language Processing Models for Reducing Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The introduction of natural language processing (NLP) technologies has significantly enhanced the potential of self-administered interventions for treating anxiety and depression by improving human-computer interactions. Although these advances, particularly in complex models such as generative artificial intelligence (AI), are highly promising, robust evidence validating the effectiveness of the interventions remains sparse.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether self-administered interventions based on NLP models can reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to November 3, 2023. We included studies with participants of any age diagnosed with depression or anxiety through professional consultation or validated psychometric instruments. Interventions had to be self-administered and based on NLP models, with passive or active comparators. Outcomes measured included depressive and anxiety symptom scores. We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies but excluded narrative, systematic, and scoping reviews. Data extraction was performed independently by pairs of authors using a predefined form. Meta-analysis was conducted using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and random effects models to account for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In all, 21 articles were selected for review, of which 76% (16/21) were included in the meta-analysis for each outcome. Most of the studies (16/21, 76%) were recent (2020-2023), with interventions being mostly AI-based NLP models (11/21, 52%); most (19/21, 90%) delivered some form of therapy (primarily cognitive behavioral therapy: 16/19, 84%). The overall meta-analysis showed that self-administered interventions based on NLP models were significantly more effective in reducing both depressive (SMD 0.819, 95% CI 0.389-1.250; P<.001) and anxiety (SMD 0.272, 95% CI 0.116-0.428; P=.001) symptoms compared to various control conditions. Subgroup analysis indicated that AI-based NLP models were effective in reducing depressive symptoms (SMD 0.821, 95% CI 0.207-1.436; P<.001) compared to pooled control conditions. Rule-based NLP models showed effectiveness in reducing both depressive (SMD 0.854, 95% CI 0.172-1.537; P=.01) and anxiety (SMD 0.347, 95% CI 0.116-0.578; P=.003) symptoms. The meta-regression showed no significant association between participants' mean age and treatment outcomes (all P>.05). Although the findings were positive, the overall certainty of evidence was very low, mainly due to a high risk of bias, heterogeneity, and potential publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the effectiveness of self-administered NLP-based interventions in alleviating depressive and anxiety symptoms, highlighting their potential to increase accessibility to, and reduce costs in, mental health care. Although the results were encouraging, the certainty of evidence was low, underscoring the need for further high-quality randomized controlled trials and studies examining implementation and usability. These interventions could become valuable components of public health strategies to address mental health issues.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42023472120; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023472120.

Pain recognition and pain empathy from a human-centered AI perspective

Sensory and emotional experiences are essential for mental and physical well-being, especially within the realm of psychiatry. This article highlights recent advances in cognitive neuroscience, emphasizing the significance of pain recognition and empathic artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. We provide an overview of the recent development process in computational pain recognition and cognitive neuroscience regarding the mechanisms of pain and empathy. Through a comprehensive discussion, the article delves into critical questions such as the methodologies for AI in recognizing pain from diverse sources of information, the necessity for AI to exhibit empathic responses, and the associated advantages and obstacles linked with the development of empathic AI. Moreover, insights into the prospects and challenges are emphasized in relation to fostering artificial empathy. By delineating potential pathways for future research, the article aims to contribute to developing effective assistants equipped with empathic capabilities, thereby introducing safe and meaningful interactions between humans and AI, particularly in the context of mental health and psychiatry.

Machine minds: Artificial intelligence in psychiatry

Diagnostic and interventional aspects of psychiatric care can be augmented by the use of digital health technologies. Recent studies have tried to explore the use of artificial intelligence-driven technologies in screening, diagnosing, and treating psychiatric disorders. This short communication presents a current perspective on using Artificial Intelligence in psychiatry.

Healthcare leaders' experiences of implementing artificial intelligence for medical history-taking and triage in Swedish primary care: an interview study

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant promise for enhancing the efficiency and safety of medical history-taking and triage within primary care. However, there remains a dearth of knowledge concerning the practical implementation of AI systems for these purposes, particularly in the context of healthcare leadership. This study explores the experiences of healthcare leaders regarding the barriers to implementing an AI application for automating medical history-taking and triage in Swedish primary care, as well as the actions they took to overcome these barriers. Furthermore, the study seeks to provide insights that can inform the development of AI implementation strategies for healthcare.

METHODS

We adopted an inductive qualitative approach, conducting semi-structured interviews with 13 healthcare leaders representing seven primary care units across three regions in Sweden. The collected data were subsequently analysed utilizing thematic analysis. Our study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research to ensure transparent and comprehensive reporting.

RESULTS

The study identified implementation barriers encountered by healthcare leaders across three domains: (1) healthcare professionals, (2) organization, and (3) technology. The first domain involved professional scepticism and resistance, the second involved adapting traditional units for digital care, and the third inadequacies in AI application functionality and system integration. To navigate around these barriers, the leaders took steps to (1) address inexperience and fear and reduce professional scepticism, (2) align implementation with digital maturity and guide patients towards digital care, and (3) refine and improve the AI application and adapt to the current state of AI application development.

CONCLUSION

The study provides valuable empirical insights into the implementation of AI for automating medical history-taking and triage in primary care as experienced by healthcare leaders. It identifies the barriers to this implementation and how healthcare leaders aligned their actions to overcome them. While progress was evident in overcoming professional-related and organizational-related barriers, unresolved technical complexities highlight the importance of AI implementation strategies that consider how leaders handle AI implementation in situ based on practical wisdom and tacit understanding. This underscores the necessity of a holistic approach for the successful implementation of AI in healthcare.

Ethical Considerations in the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Health Care: A Comprehensive Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies are revolutionizing health care by offering unprecedented opportunities to enhance patient care, optimize clinical workflows, and advance medical research. However, the integration of AI and ML into healthcare systems raises significant ethical considerations that must be carefully addressed to ensure responsible and equitable deployment. This comprehensive review explored the multifaceted ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI and ML in health care, including privacy and data security, algorithmic bias, transparency, clinical validation, and professional responsibility. By critically examining these ethical dimensions, stakeholders can navigate the ethical complexities of AI and ML integration in health care, while safeguarding patient welfare and upholding ethical principles. By embracing ethical best practices and fostering collaboration across interdisciplinary teams, the healthcare community can harness the full potential of AI and ML technologies to usher in a new era of personalized data-driven health care that prioritizes patient well-being and equity.

Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being: Student perceptions of positive impact in the age of smart learning

The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and the ubiquity of social media have become transformative agents in contemporary educational ecosystems. The spotlight of this inquiry focuses on the nexus between AI and social media usage in relation to academic performance and mental well-being, and the role of smart learning in facilitating these relationships. Using partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) on a sample of 401 Chinese university students. The study results reveal that both AI and social media have a positive impact on academic performance and mental well-being among university students. Furthermore, smart learning serves as a positive mediating variable, amplifying the beneficial effects of AI and social media on both academic performance and mental well-being. These revelations contribute to the discourse on technology-enhanced education, showing that embracing AI and social media can have a positive impact on student performance and well-being.

Artificial intelligence in future nursing care: Exploring perspectives of nursing professionals - A descriptive qualitative study

Background

The healthcare landscape is rapidly evolving, with artificial intelligence (AI) emerging as a transformative force. In this context, understanding the viewpoints of nursing professionals regarding the integration of AI in future nursing care is crucial.

Aims

This study aimed to provide insights into the perceptions of nursing professionals regarding the role of AI in shaping the future of healthcare.

Methods

A cohort of 23 nursing professionals was recruited between April 7, 2023, and May 4, 2023, for this study. Employing a thematic analysis approach, qualitative data from interviews with nursing professionals were analyzed. Verbatim transcripts underwent rigorous coding, and these codes were organized into themes through constant comparative analysis. The themes were refined and developed through the grouping of related codes, ensuring an authentic representation of participants' viewpoints.

Results

After careful data analysis, ten key themes emerged including: (I) Perceptions of AI readiness; (II) Benefits and concerns; (III) Enhanced patient outcomes; (IV) Collaboration and workflow; (V) Human-tech balance: (VI) Training and skill development; (VII) Ethical and legal considerations; (VIII) AI implementation barriers; (IX) Patient-nurse relationships; (X) Future vision and adaptation.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into nursing professionals' perspectives on the integration of AI in future nursing care. It highlights their enthusiasm for AI's potential benefits while emphasizing the importance of ethical and compassionate nursing practice. The findings underscore the need for comprehensive training programs to equip nursing professionals with the skills necessary for successful AI integration. Ultimately, this research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the role of AI in nursing, paving the way for a future where innovative technologies complement and enhance the delivery of patient-centered care.

Machine Learning and Bias in Medical Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges

Bias in health care has been well documented and results in disparate and worsened outcomes for at-risk groups. Medical imaging plays a critical role in facilitating patient diagnoses but involves multiple sources of bias including factors related to access to imaging modalities, acquisition of images, and assessment (ie, interpretation) of imaging data. Machine learning (ML) applied to diagnostic imaging has demonstrated the potential to improve the quality of imaging-based diagnosis and the precision of measuring imaging-based traits. Algorithms can leverage subtle information not visible to the human eye to detect underdiagnosed conditions or derive new disease phenotypes by linking imaging features with clinical outcomes, all while mitigating cognitive bias in interpretation. Importantly, however, the application of ML to diagnostic imaging has the potential to either reduce or propagate bias. Understanding the potential gain as well as the potential risks requires an understanding of how and what ML models learn. Common risks of propagating bias can arise from unbalanced training, suboptimal architecture design or selection, and uneven application of models. Notwithstanding these risks, ML may yet be applied to improve gain from imaging across all 3A's (access, acquisition, and assessment) for all patients. In this review, we present a framework for understanding the balance of opportunities and challenges for minimizing bias in medical imaging, how ML may improve current approaches to imaging, and what specific design considerations should be made as part of efforts to maximize the quality of health care for all.

Health Care Professionals' Views on the Use of Passive Sensing, AI, and Machine Learning in Mental Health Care: Systematic Review With Meta-Synthesis

BACKGROUND

Mental health difficulties are highly prevalent worldwide. Passive sensing technologies and applied artificial intelligence (AI) methods can provide an innovative means of supporting the management of mental health problems and enhancing the quality of care. However, the views of stakeholders are important in understanding the potential barriers to and facilitators of their implementation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to review, critically appraise, and synthesize qualitative findings relating to the views of mental health care professionals on the use of passive sensing and AI in mental health care.

METHODS

A systematic search of qualitative studies was performed using 4 databases. A meta-synthesis approach was used, whereby studies were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach within a critical realist epistemological framework.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 studies met the eligibility criteria. The 3 main themes were uses of passive sensing and AI in clinical practice, barriers to and facilitators of use in practice, and consequences for service users. A total of 5 subthemes were identified: barriers, facilitators, empowerment, risk to well-being, and data privacy and protection issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinicians are open-minded about the use of passive sensing and AI in mental health care, important factors to consider are service user well-being, clinician workloads, and therapeutic relationships. Service users and clinicians must be involved in the development of digital technologies and systems to ensure ease of use. The development of, and training in, clear policies and guidelines on the use of passive sensing and AI in mental health care, including risk management and data security procedures, will also be key to facilitating clinician engagement. The means for clinicians and service users to provide feedback on how the use of passive sensing and AI in practice is being received should also be considered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42022331698; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=331698.

Beliefs, experiences and concerns of using artificial intelligence in healthcare: A qualitative synthesis

Objective

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a developing field in the context of healthcare. As this technology continues to be implemented in patient care, there is a growing need to understand the thoughts and experiences of stakeholders in this area to ensure that future AI development and implementation is successful. The aim of this study was to conduct a literature search of qualitative studies exploring the opinions of stakeholders such as clinicians, patients, and technology experts in order to establish the most common themes and ideas that have been presented in this research.

Methods

A literature search was conducted of existing qualitative research on stakeholder beliefs about the use of AI use in healthcare. Twenty-one papers were selected and analysed resulting in the development of four key themes relating to patient care, patient-doctor relationships, lack of education and resources, and the need for regulations.

Results

Overall, patients and healthcare workers are open to the use of AI in care and appear positive about potential benefits. However, concerns were raised relating to the lack of empathy in interactions of AI tools, and potential risks that may arise from the data collection needed for AI use and development. Stakeholders in the healthcare, technology, and business sectors all stressed that there was a lack of appropriate education, funding, and guidelines surrounding AI, and these concerns needed to be addressed to ensure future implementation is safe and suitable for patient care.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the results found in this study highlighted that there was a need for communication between stakeholder in order for these concerns to be addressed, mitigate potential risks, and maximise benefits for patients and clinicians alike. The results also identified a need for further qualitative research in this area to further understand stakeholder experiences as AI use continues to develop.

Harnessing Artificial Intelligence: Strategies for Mental Health Nurses in Optimizing Psychiatric Patient Care

This narrative review explores the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on mental health nursing, particularly in enhancing psychiatric patient care. AI technologies present new strategies for early detection, risk assessment, and improving treatment adherence in mental health. They also facilitate remote patient monitoring, bridge geographical gaps, and support clinical decision-making. The evolution of virtual mental health assistants and AI-enhanced therapeutic interventions are also discussed. These technological advancements reshape the nurse-patient interactions while ensuring personalized, efficient, and high-quality care. The review also addresses AI's ethical and responsible use in mental health nursing, emphasizing patient privacy, data security, and the balance between human interaction and AI tools. As AI applications in mental health care continue to evolve, this review encourages continued innovation while advocating for responsible implementation, thereby optimally leveraging the potential of AI in mental health nursing.

A Review of Converging Technologies in eHealth Pertaining to Artificial Intelligence

Over the last couple of years, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, many healthcare issues have been exacerbated, highlighting the paramount need to provide both reliable and affordable health services to remote locations by using the latest technologies such as video conferencing, data management, the secure transfer of patient information, and efficient data analysis tools such as machine learning algorithms. In the constant struggle to offer healthcare to everyone, many modern technologies find applicability in eHealth, mHealth, telehealth or telemedicine. Through this paper, we attempt to render an overview of what different technologies are used in certain healthcare applications, ranging from remote patient monitoring in the field of cardio-oncology to analyzing EEG signals through machine learning for the prediction of seizures, focusing on the role of artificial intelligence in eHealth.

Short-stay crisis units for mental health patients on crisis care pathways: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Internationally, an increasing proportion of emergency department visits are mental health related. Concurrently, psychiatric wards are often occupied above capacity. Healthcare providers have introduced short-stay, hospital-based crisis units offering a therapeutic space for stabilisation, assessment and appropriate referral. Research lags behind roll-out, and a review of the evidence is urgently needed to inform policy and further introduction of similar units.

AIMS

This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of short-stay, hospital-based mental health crisis units.

METHOD

We searched EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL and PsycINFO up to March 2021. All designs incorporating a control or comparison group were eligible for inclusion, and all effect estimates with a comparison group were extracted and combined meta-analytically where appropriate. We assessed study risk of bias with Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions and Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials.

RESULTS

Data from twelve studies across six countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, The Netherlands, UK and USA) and 67 505 participants were included. Data indicated that units delivered benefits on many outcomes. Units could reduce psychiatric holds (42% after intervention compared with 49.8% before intervention; difference = 7.8%; P < 0.0001) and increase out-patient follow-up care (χ² = 37.42, d.f. = 1; P < 0.001). Meta-analysis indicated a significant reduction in length of emergency department stay (by 164.24 min; 95% CI -261.24 to -67.23 min; P < 0.001) and number of in-patient admissions (odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.68; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-stay mental health crisis units are effective for reducing emergency department wait times and in-patient admissions. Further research should investigate the impact of units on patient experience, and clinical and social outcomes.

Decision effect of a deep-learning model to assist a head computed tomography order for pediatric traumatic brain injury

The study aims to measure the effectiveness of an AI-based traumatic intracranial hemorrhage prediction model in the decisions of emergency physicians regarding ordering head computed tomography (CT) scans. We developed a deep-learning model for predicting traumatic intracranial hemorrhages (DEEPTICH) using a national trauma registry with 1.8 million cases. For simulation, 24 cases were selected from previous emergency department cases. For each case, physicians made decisions on ordering a head CT twice: initially without the DEEPTICH assistance, and subsequently with the DEEPTICH assistance. Of the 528 responses from 22 participants, 201 initial decisions were different from the DEEPTICH recommendations. Of these 201 initial decisions, 94 were changed after DEEPTICH assistance (46.8%). For the cases in which CT was initially not ordered, 71.4% of the decisions were changed (p < 0.001), and for the cases in which CT was initially ordered, 37.2% (p < 0.001) of the decisions were changed after DEEPTICH assistance. When using DEEPTICH, 46 (11.6%) unnecessary CTs were avoided (p < 0.001) and 10 (11.4%) traumatic intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs) that would have been otherwise missed were found (p = 0.039). We found that emergency physicians were likely to accept AI based on how they perceived its safety.

Accelerating the impact of artificial intelligence in mental healthcare through implementation science

Background

The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in mental healthcare offers a potential solution to some of the problems associated with the availability, attractiveness, and accessibility of mental healthcare services. However, there are many knowledge gaps regarding how to implement and best use AI to add value to mental healthcare services, providers, and consumers. The aim of this paper is to identify challenges and opportunities for AI use in mental healthcare and to describe key insights from implementation science of potential relevance to understand and facilitate AI implementation in mental healthcare.

Methods

The paper is based on a selective review of articles concerning AI in mental healthcare and implementation science.

Results

Research in implementation science has established the importance of considering and planning for implementation from the start, the progression of implementation through different stages, and the appreciation of determinants at multiple levels. Determinant frameworks and implementation theories have been developed to understand and explain how different determinants impact on implementation. AI research should explore the relevance of these determinants for AI implementation. Implementation strategies to support AI implementation must address determinants specific to AI implementation in mental health. There might also be a need to develop new theoretical approaches or augment and recontextualize existing ones. Implementation outcomes may have to be adapted to be relevant in an AI implementation context.

Conclusion

Knowledge derived from implementation science could provide an important starting point for research on implementation of AI in mental healthcare. This field has generated many insights and provides a broad range of theories, frameworks, and concepts that are likely relevant for this research. However, when taking advantage of the existing knowledge basis, it is important to also be explorative and study AI implementation in health and mental healthcare as a new phenomenon in its own right since implementing AI may differ in various ways from implementing evidence-based practices in terms of what implementation determinants, strategies, and outcomes are most relevant. Plain Language Summary: The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in mental healthcare offers a potential solution to some of the problems associated with the availability, attractiveness, and accessibility of mental healthcare services. However, there are many knowledge gaps concerning how to implement and best use AI to add value to mental healthcare services, providers, and consumers. This paper is based on a selective review of articles concerning AI in mental healthcare and implementation science, with the aim to identify challenges and opportunities for the use of AI in mental healthcare and describe key insights from implementation science of potential relevance to understand and facilitate AI implementation in mental healthcare. AI offers opportunities for identifying the patients most in need of care or the interventions that might be most appropriate for a given population or individual. AI also offers opportunities for supporting a more reliable diagnosis of psychiatric disorders and ongoing monitoring and tailoring during the course of treatment. However, AI implementation challenges exist at organizational/policy, individual, and technical levels, making it relevant to draw on implementation science knowledge for understanding and facilitating implementation of AI in mental healthcare. Knowledge derived from implementation science could provide an important starting point for research on AI implementation in mental healthcare. This field has generated many insights and provides a broad range of theories, frameworks, and concepts that are likely relevant for this research.

Telemedicine and artificial intelligence to support self-isolation of COVID-19 patients: Recent updates and challenges

Background

Asymptomatic and high-risk COVID-19 patients are advised to self-isolate at home. However, patients may not realize that the condition is deteriorating until too late.

Objective

This study aims to review various artificial intelligence-based telemedicine research during the COVID-19 outbreak and proposes a framework for developing telemedicine powered by artificial intelligence to monitor progression in COVID-19 patients during isolation at home. It also aims to map challenges using artificial intelligence-based telemedicine in the community.

Methods

A systematic review was performed for the related articles published in 2019-2021 and conducted in the PubMed and ScienceDirect database using the keywords "telemedicine," "artificial intelligence," and "COVID-19". The inclusion criteria were full-text articles and original research written in the English language.

Results

Thirteen articles were included in this review to describe the current application of artificial intelligence-based telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Various current applications have been implemented, such as for early diagnosis and tracing of contact for the users, to monitor symptoms and decision-making treatment, clinical management, and virtual and remote treatment. We also proposed the framework of telemedicine powered by artificial intelligence for support the self-isolation of COVID-19 patients based on the recent update in technology. However, we identified some challenges for using digital health technologies because of the ethical and practical use, the policy and regulation, and device use both for healthcare workers and patients.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence promises to improve the practice of medicine in various ways. However, practical applications still need to be explored, and medical professionals also need to adapt to these advances for better healthcare delivery to the public.

Pragmatic AI-augmentation in mental healthcare: Key technologies, potential benefits, and real-world challenges and solutions for frontline clinicians

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into mental health holds the promise of increasing patient access, engagement, and quality of care, and of improving clinician quality of work life. However, to date, studies of AI technologies in mental health have focused primarily on challenges that policymakers, clinical leaders, and data and computer scientists face, rather than on challenges that frontline mental health clinicians are likely to face as they attempt to integrate AI-based technologies into their everyday clinical practice. In this Perspective, we describe a framework for "pragmatic AI-augmentation" that addresses these issues by describing three categories of emerging AI-based mental health technologies which frontline clinicians can leverage in their clinical practice-automation, engagement, and clinical decision support technologies. We elaborate the potential benefits offered by these technologies, the likely day-to-day challenges they may raise for mental health clinicians, and some solutions that clinical leaders and technology developers can use to address these challenges, based on emerging experience with the integration of AI technologies into clinician daily practice in other healthcare disciplines.

Human Factors and Technological Characteristics Influencing the Interaction with AI-enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Literature Review (Preprint)

Background

The digitization and automation of diagnostics and treatments promise to alter the quality of health care and improve patient outcomes, whereas the undersupply of medical personnel, high workload on medical professionals, and medical case complexity increase. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have been proven to help medical professionals in their everyday work through their ability to process vast amounts of patient information. However, comprehensive adoption is partially disrupted by specific technological and personal characteristics. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), CDSSs have become an adaptive technology with human-like capabilities and are able to learn and change their characteristics over time. However, research has not reflected on the characteristics and factors essential for effective collaboration between human actors and AI-enabled CDSSs.

Objective

Our study aims to summarize the factors influencing effective collaboration between medical professionals and AI-enabled CDSSs. These factors are essential for medical professionals, management, and technology designers to reflect on the adoption, implementation, and development of an AI-enabled CDSS.

Methods

We conducted a literature review including 3 different meta-databases, screening over 1000 articles and including 101 articles for full-text assessment. Of the 101 articles, 7 (6.9%) met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed for our synthesis.

Results

We identified the technological characteristics and human factors that appear to have an essential effect on the collaboration of medical professionals and AI-enabled CDSSs in accordance with our research objective, namely, training data quality, performance, explainability, adaptability, medical expertise, technological expertise, personality, cognitive biases, and trust. Comparing our results with those from research on non-AI CDSSs, some characteristics and factors retain their importance, whereas others gain or lose relevance owing to the uniqueness of human-AI interactions. However, only a few (1/7, 14%) studies have mentioned the theoretical foundations and patient outcomes related to AI-enabled CDSSs.

Conclusions

Our study provides a comprehensive overview of the relevant characteristics and factors that influence the interaction and collaboration between medical professionals and AI-enabled CDSSs. Rather limited theoretical foundations currently hinder the possibility of creating adequate concepts and models to explain and predict the interrelations between these characteristics and factors. For an appropriate evaluation of the human-AI collaboration, patient outcomes and the role of patients in the decision-making process should be considered.