Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. Technique and considerations

A study of patient-reported pain during bone marrow aspiration and biopsy using local anesthesia alone compared with local anesthesia with intravenous midazolam coadministration at a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa

Introduction

During the bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB) procedure, patients report pain of widely variable intensity. There is limited literature on the factors associated with the pain. The use of local anesthesia (LA) only is still widespread although it does not abolish the pain. Midazolam is the most commonly used benzodiazepine for conscious sedation. Our center introduced universal midazolam sedation unless there is a contraindication to its use, 4 years ago. This study assessed the impact of the universal use of intravenous midazolam for BMAB compared to use of LA only. The factors associated with the pain of BMAB, were analyzed.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on adult patients who had a BMAB procedure from July 1, 2018 to March 30, 2019. A questionnaire incorporating a visual analog pain scale, was used for data collection.

Results

A total of 182 BMAB procedures were included in the study. Pain was reported in all procedures performed under LA and only in 29.1% of procedures performed with midazolam. Age, sex, race, level of education, body mass index (BMI), indication and diagnosis had no influence on pain. Patients who had previous BMAB experienced less pain. Experience of operator had a significant effect on pain. Midazolam dose showed a negative correlation with pain.

Conclusion

LA only is not enough to abolish pain of BMAB. Midazolam conscious sedation used with LA reduces pain to acceptable levels. Patients with previous experience of BMAB under midazolam premedication reported less pain. Furthermore, the experience of operator reduced the pain significantly.

Impact of the Process Variables on the Yield of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

Human bone marrow (BM) has been highlighted as a promising source of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) containing various growth factors and cytokines that can be potentially utilized in regenerative procedures involving cartilage and bone. However, the proportion of MSCs in the nucleated cell population of BM is only around 0.001% to 0.01% thereby making the harvesting and processing technique crucial for obtaining optimal results upon its use in various regenerative processes. Although several studies in the literature have given encouraging results on the utility of BM aspiration concentrate (BMAC) in various regenerative procedures, there is a lack of consensus concerning the harvesting variables such as choice of anesthetic agent to be used, site of harvest, size of the syringe to be used, anticoagulant of choice, and processing variables such as centrifugation time, and speed. In this review article, we aim to discuss the variables in the harvesting and processing technique of BMAC and their impact on the yield of MSCs in the final concentrate obtained from them.

Sternal Bone Marrow Harvesting and Culturing Techniques from Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Background: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are the most prominent cell type used in clinical regenerative medicine and stem cell research. MSCs are commonly harvested from bone marrow that has been aspirated from patients’ iliac crest. However, the ethical challenges of finding consenting patients and obtaining fresh autologous cells via invasive extraction methods remain to be barriers to MSC research. Methods: Techniques of harvesting sternal bone marrow, isolating and culturing MSCs, MSC surface phenotyping, and MSC differentiation are described. Samples from 50 patients undergoing a sternotomy were collected, and the time taken to reach 80% confluency and cell count at the second splitting of MSC were measured. Results: MSC isolated from the sternal bone marrow of patients undergoing cardiac surgery demonstrated successful MSC surface phenotyping and MSC differentiation. The mean cell count at the time of the second split was 1,628,025, and the mean time taken to reach the second split was 24.8 days. Conclusion: Herein, we describe the first reported technique of harvesting sternal bone marrow from patients already undergoing open-chest cardiac surgery to reduce the invasiveness of bone marrow harvesting, as well as the methods of isolating, culturing, and identifying MSCs for the clinical application of constructing autologous MSC-derived biomaterials.