1
|
Balzano G, Reni M, Di Bartolomeo M, Scorsetti M, Caraceni A, Rivizzigno P, Amorosi A, Scardoni A, Abu Hilal M, Ferrari G, Labianca R, Venturini M, Doglioni C, Riva L, Caccialanza R, Carrara S. Translating knowledge into policy: Organizational model and minimum requirements for the implementation of a regional pancreas unit network. Dig Liver Dis 2024:S1590-8658(24)00776-X. [PMID: 38851973 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic and periampullary cancers pose significant challenges in oncological care due to their complexity and diagnostic difficulties. Global experiences underscore the crucial role of multidisciplinary collaboration and centralized care in improving patient outcomes in this context. Recognizing these challenges, Lombardy, Italy's most populous region, embarked on establishing pancreas units across its territory to enhance clinical outcomes and organizational efficiency. This initiative, driven by a multistakeholder approach involving the Lombardy Welfare Directorate, clinicians, and a patient association, emphasizes the centralization of complex care in high-volume hospitals, adopting a hub-and-spoke model and a multidisciplinary approach. This article outlines the process and criteria set forth for pancreas unit implementation, aiming to provide a structured framework for enhancing pancreatic cancer care. Central to this initiative is the establishment of structured criteria and minimal requirements, not only for surgery but also for other essential components of care, ensuring a comprehensive approach to pancreatic cancer management. The Lombardy model offers a structured framework for enhancing pancreatic cancer care, with potential applicability to other regions and countries seeking to improve their cancer care infrastructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpaolo Balzano
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Michele Reni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano 20089, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Augusto Caraceni
- Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Università degli Studi di Milano Via della Commenda 19 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Piero Rivizzigno
- Codice Viola, Pancreatic Cancer Advocacy Group, 20855, Lesmo (MB), Italy
| | - Alessandro Amorosi
- Welfare General Directorate, Regione Lombardia; Palazzo Lombardia, Piazza Città di Lombardia, 1, 20124 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scardoni
- Welfare General Directorate, Regione Lombardia; Palazzo Lombardia, Piazza Città di Lombardia, 1, 20124 Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati 57, Brescia 25124, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Oncologic Surgery ASST GOM Niguarda Nigurda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Venturini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, 21100, Varese, Italy; Department of Medicine and Technological Innovation (DIMIT), Insubria University, Varese, Italy
| | - Claudio Doglioni
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Riva
- Frailty Department, Local Network of Palliative Care, ASST, Lecco, Italy
| | - Riccardo Caccialanza
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinco San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bloomfield GC, Radkani P, Nigam A, Namgoong J, Chou J, Park BU, Fishbein TM, Winslow ER. Approach to postpancreatectomy care Impacts outcomes: Retrospective Validation of the PORSCH trial. Am J Surg 2024:S0002-9610(24)00273-3. [PMID: 38782685 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the recent PORSCH trial, a three-part postpancreatectomy care algorithm was employed with a near 50 % reduction in mortality. We hypothesized that clinical care congruent with this protocol would correlate with better outcomes in our patients. METHODS Real-world postoperative care was compared to the pathway described by the PORSCH trial and patients were assigned into groups based on congruence with its recommendations. The primary composite outcome (PCO) consisted of 90-day mortality, organ failure, and interventions for bleeding. RESULTS Of 289 patients, care of 12 % was entirely congruent with the PORSCH algorithm. The PCO was recorded in 9 % of the PORSCH care group, 8 % of the Partial-PORSCH care group, and 19 % of the Non-PORSCH care group (p = 0.044). Adverse outcomes were highest when pancreaticoduodenectomy patients received care incongruent with the algorithm's CT imaging recommendations. CONCLUSIONS These results add external validity to the principles of clinical care underlying the PORSCH algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pejman Radkani
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Aradhya Nigam
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jean Namgoong
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jiling Chou
- MedStar Health Research Institute Department of Biostatistics & Biomedical Informatics, Hyattsville, MD, USA
| | - Byoung Uk Park
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas M Fishbein
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Emily R Winslow
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cawich SO, Dixon E, Shukla PJ, Shrikhande SV, Deshpande RR, Mohammed F, Pearce NW, Francis W, Johnson S, Bujhawan J. Rescue from complications after pancreaticoduodenectomies at a low-volume Caribbean center: Value of tailored peri-pancreatectomy protocols. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:681-688. [PMID: 38577074 PMCID: PMC10989354 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a technically complex operation, with a relatively high risk for complications. The ability to rescue patients from post-PD complications is as a recognized quality measure. Tailored protocols were instituted at our low volume facility in the year 2013. AIM To document the rate of rescue from post-PD complications with tailored protocols in place as a measure of quality. METHODS A retrospective audit was performed to collect data from patients who experienced major post-PD complications at a low volume pancreatic surgery unit in Trinidad and Tobago between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2023. Standardized definitions from the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery were used to define post-PD complications, and the modified Clavien-Dindo classification was used to classify post-PD complications. RESULTS Over the study period, 113 patients at a mean age of 57.5 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 9.23; range: 30-90; median: 56) underwent PDs at this facility. Major complications were recorded in 33 (29.2%) patients at a mean age of 53.8 years (SD: ± 7.9). Twenty-nine (87.9%) patients who experienced major morbidity were salvaged after aggressive treatment of their complication. Four (3.5%) died from bleeding pseudoaneurysm (1), septic shock secondary to a bile leak (1), anastomotic leak (1), and myocardial infarction (1). There was a significantly greater salvage rate in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists scores ≤ 2 (93.3% vs 25%; P = 0.0024). CONCLUSION This paper adds to the growing body of evidence that volume alone should not be used as a marker of quality for patients requiring PD. Despite low volumes at our facility, we demonstrated that 87.9% of patients were rescued from major complications. We attributed this to several factors including development of rescue protocols, the competence of the pancreatic surgery teams and continuous, and adaptive learning by the entire institution, culminating in the development of tailored peri-pancreatectomy protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamir O Cawich
- Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, St Augustine 000000, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Elijah Dixon
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N2T9, Canada
| | - Parul J Shukla
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National University, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Rahul R Deshpande
- Department of Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom
| | - Fawwaz Mohammed
- Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, St Augustine 000000, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Neil W Pearce
- University Surgical Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
| | - Wesley Francis
- Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, Nassau N-1184, Bahamas
| | - Shaneeta Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, United States
| | - Johann Bujhawan
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital in Port of Spain, Port of Spain 000000, Trinidad and Tobago
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Driessens H, Wijma AG, Buis CI, Nijkamp MW, Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke GJ, Klaase JM. Prehabilitation: tertiary prevention matters. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae028. [PMID: 38436470 PMCID: PMC10910596 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Driessens
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Allard G Wijma
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn I Buis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten W Nijkamp
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hirpara DH, Irish J, Rashid M, Martin T, Zhu A, Hunter A, Jayaraman S, Wei AC, Coburn NG, Wright FC. Defining Standards for Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Surgery in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:157-165. [PMID: 37796140 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2006, Cancer Care Ontario created Surgical Oncology Standards for the delivery of hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery including hepatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Our objective was to identify the impact of standardization on outcomes after HPB surgery in Ontario, Canada. STUDY DESIGN This study was a population-level analysis of patients undergoing hepatectomy or PD (2003 to 2019). Logistic regression models were used to compare 30- and 90-day mortality and length of stay (LOS) before (2003 to 2006), during (2007 to 2011), and after (2012 to 2019) standardization. Interrupted time series models were used to co-analyze secular trends. RESULTS A total of 7,904 hepatectomies and 5,238 PDs were performed. More than 80% of all cases were performed at a designated center (DC) before standardization. This increased to >98% in the poststandardization era. Median volumes at DCs increased from 55 to 67 hepatectomies/year and from 22 to 50 PDs/year over time. In addition, 30-day mortality after hepatectomy was 2.6% before standardization and 2.3% after standardization (p = 0.9); 30-day mortality after PD was 3.6% before standardization and 2.4% after standardization (p = 0.1). Multivariable analyses revealed a significant difference in 90-day mortality following PD poststandardization (4.3% vs 6.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.7; p = 0.03). Median LOS was shorter for hepatectomy (6 days vs 8 days) and PD (9 days vs 14 days; p < 0.0001) after standardization. Immediate and late effects on mortality and LOS were likely attributable to secular trends, which predated standardization. CONCLUSIONS Standardization was associated with a higher volume of hepatectomy and PDs with further concentration of care at DCs. Pre-existing quality initiatives may have attenuated the effect of standardization on quality outcomes. Our data highlight the merits of a multifaceted provincial system for enabling consistent access to high quality HPB care throughout a region of 15 million people over a 16-year period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhruvin H Hirpara
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Hirpara, Irish, Zhu, Jayaraman, Coburn, Wright)
| | - Jonathan Irish
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Hirpara, Irish, Zhu, Jayaraman, Coburn, Wright)
- the Division of Head and Neck Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Irish)
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Irish, Rashid, Martin, Hunter, Wright)
| | - Mohammed Rashid
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Irish, Rashid, Martin, Hunter, Wright)
| | - Tharsiya Martin
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Irish, Rashid, Martin, Hunter, Wright)
| | - Alice Zhu
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Hirpara, Irish, Zhu, Jayaraman, Coburn, Wright)
| | - Amber Hunter
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Irish, Rashid, Martin, Hunter, Wright)
| | - Shiva Jayaraman
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Hirpara, Irish, Zhu, Jayaraman, Coburn, Wright)
- the Division of General Surgery, Unity Health, St Joseph's Health Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Jayaraman)
| | - Alice C Wei
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (Wei)
| | - Natalie G Coburn
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Hirpara, Irish, Zhu, Jayaraman, Coburn, Wright)
- the Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Coburn, Wright)
| | - Frances C Wright
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Hirpara, Irish, Zhu, Jayaraman, Coburn, Wright)
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Irish, Rashid, Martin, Hunter, Wright)
- the Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Coburn, Wright)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fukada M, Murase K, Higashi T, Yasufuku I, Sato Y, Tajima JY, Kiyama S, Tanaka Y, Okumura N, Matsuhashi N. Perioperative predictive factors of failure to rescue following highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: a single-institution retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:365. [PMID: 37996865 PMCID: PMC10668400 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03257-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as a postoperative complication leading to death, is a recently described outcome metric used to evaluate treatment quality. However, the predictive factors for FTR, particularly following highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery (HBPS), have not been adequately investigated. This study aimed to identify perioperative predictive factors for FTR following highly advanced HBPS. METHODS This single-institution retrospective study involved 177 patients at Gifu University Hospital, Japan, who developed severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grades ≥ III) between 2010 and 2022 following highly advanced HBPS. Univariate analysis was used to identify pre-, intra-, and postoperative risks of FTR. RESULTS Nine postoperative mortalities occurred during the study period (overall mortality rate, 1.3% [9/686]; FTR rate, 5.1% [9/177]). Univariate analysis indicated that comorbid liver disease, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative liver failure, postoperative respiratory failure, and postoperative bleeding significantly correlated with FTR. CONCLUSIONS FTR was found to be associated with perioperative factors. Well-coordinated surgical procedures to avoid intra- and postoperative bleeding and unnecessary blood transfusions, as well as postoperative team management with attention to the occurrence of organ failure, may decrease FTR rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Fukada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Katsutoshi Murase
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Toshiya Higashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Itaru Yasufuku
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Yuta Sato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Jesse Yu Tajima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Shigeru Kiyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Naoki Okumura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morita Y, Sakaguchi T, Matsumoto A, Ida S, Muraki R, Kitajima R, Furuhashi S, Takeda M, Kikuchi H, Hiramatsu Y, Takeuchi H. The cholinesterase and C-reactive protein score is a potential predictor of pseudoaneurysm formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with soft pancreas. BMC Surg 2023; 23:344. [PMID: 37964345 PMCID: PMC10647161 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02211-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pseudoaneurysm (PA) rupture after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a life-threatening complication. Most PA cases originate from postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs). Although several risk factors for POPF have been identified, specific risk factors for PA formation remain unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed PD cases with soft pancreas and proposed a novel strategy for early detection of PA formation. METHODS Overall, 120 patients underwent PD between 2010 and 2020 at our institution; of these, 65 patients with soft pancreas were enrolled. We evaluated the clinicopathological factors influencing PA formation and developed a risk score to predict PA formation. RESULTS In total, 11 of the 65 patients developed PAs (PA formation group: PAG), and 8 of these 11 PAs ruptured. The median time to PA formation was 15 days, with a minimum of 5 days. The PAG was significantly older than the non-PA formation group, were predominantly men, and had comorbid diabetes mellitus. Pre- and intra-operative findings were similar between the two groups. Importantly, no significant differences were found in postoperative drain amylase levels and total drain amylase content. Cholinesterase and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on postoperative day (POD) 3 were significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that cholinesterase ≤ 112 U/L and CRP ≥ 16.0 mg/dl on POD 3 were independent predictors of PA formation. CONCLUSIONS Decreased cholinesterase and elevated CRP on POD 3 (Cho-C score) are useful predictors of PA formation in cases with soft pancreas. In such cases, periodic computed tomography evaluations and strict drain management are necessary to prevent life-threatening hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshifumi Morita
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan.
- Division of Surgical care, Morimachi, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
| | | | - Akio Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Shinya Ida
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Ryuta Muraki
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Ryo Kitajima
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Satoru Furuhashi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Makoto Takeda
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Kikuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Hiramatsu
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
- Department of Perioperative Functioning Care & Support, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroya Takeuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Perri G, van Hilst J, Li S, Besselink MG, Hogg ME, Marchegiani G. Teaching modern pancreatic surgery: close relationship between centralization, innovation, and dissemination of care. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad081. [PMID: 37698977 PMCID: PMC10496870 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic surgery is increasingly moving towards centralization in high-volume centres, supported by evidence on the volume-outcome relationship. At the same time, minimally invasive pancreatic surgery is becoming more and more established worldwide, and interest in new techniques, such as robotic pancreatoduodenectomy, is growing. Such recent innovations are reshaping modern pancreatic surgery, but they also represent new challenges for surgical training in its current form. METHODS This narrative review presents a chosen selection of literature, giving a picture of the current state of training in pancreatic surgery, together with the authors' own views, and in the context of centralization and innovation towards minimally invasive techniques. RESULTS Centralization of pancreatic surgery at high-volume centres, volume-outcome relationships, innovation through minimally invasive technologies, learning curves in both traditional and minimally invasive surgery, and standardized training paths are the different, but deeply interconnected, topics of this article. Proper training is essential to ensure quality of care, but innovation and centralization may represent challenges to overcome with new training models. CONCLUSION Innovations in pancreatic surgery are introduced with the aim of increasing the quality of care. However, their successful implementation is deeply dependent on dissemination and standardization of surgical training, adapted to fit in the changing landscape of modern pancreatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giampaolo Perri
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shen Li
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of HPB Surgery, NorthShore Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koerner AS, Thomas AS, Chabot JA, Kluger MD, Sugahara KN, Schrope BA. Associations Between Patient Characteristics and Whipple Procedure Outcomes Before and After Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:1855-1866. [PMID: 37165160 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05693-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multimodal perioperative care bundle aimed to improve pancreatic surgery outcomes. This work evaluates whether a Whipple ERAS protocol can be safely implemented at a quaternary care center. We also aimed to assess if race and socioeconomic factors are associated with disparities in outcomes in patients undergoing a Whipple ERAS protocol. METHODS A retrospective review identified demographic and clinical data for 458 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomies (PDs) at a single institution from October 2017 to May 2022. Patients were split into two cohorts: pre-ERAS (treated before implementation) and ERAS (treated after). Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission and mortality rates, and major complications. RESULTS There were 213 pre-ERAS PD patients, and 245 were managed with an ERAS protocol. More ERAS patients had a BMI > 30 (15.5% vs. 8.0%; p = 0.01) and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15.5% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.001). ERAS patients had a higher rate of major complications (57.6% vs. 37.6%; p < 0.001). Medicaid patients did not have more complications or longer LOS compared to non-Medicaid patients. On univariate analysis, race/ethnicity or gender was not significantly associated with a higher rate of major complications or prolonged LOS. CONCLUSION A Whipple ERAS protocol did not significantly change LOS, readmissions, or 30-day mortality. Rate of overall complications did not significantly change after implementation, but rate of major complications increased. These outcomes were not significantly impacted by race/ethnicity, gender, tumor staging, or insurance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna S Koerner
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Alexander S Thomas
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - John A Chabot
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Michael D Kluger
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Kazuki N Sugahara
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Beth A Schrope
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alhulaili ZM, Linnemann RJ, Dascau L, Pleijhuis RG, Klaase JM. A Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis analysis to evaluate the quality of reporting of postoperative pancreatic fistula prediction models after pancreatoduodenectomy: A systematic review. Surgery 2023; 174:684-691. [PMID: 37296054 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a frequent and potentially lethal complication after pancreatoduodenectomy. Several models have been developed to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula risk. This study was performed to evaluate the quality of reporting of postoperative pancreatic fistula prediction models after pancreatoduodenectomy using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist that provides guidelines on reporting prediction models to enhance transparency and to help in the decision-making regarding the implementation of the appropriate risk models into clinical practice. METHODS Studies that described prediction models to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The TRIPOD checklist was used to evaluate the adherence rate. The area under the curve and other performance measures were extracted if reported. A quadrant matrix chart is created to plot the area under the curve against TRIPOD adherence rate to find models with a combination of above-average TRIPOD adherence and area under the curve. RESULTS In total, 52 predictive models were included (23 development, 15 external validation, 4 incremental value, and 10 development and external validation). No risk model achieved 100% adherence to the TRIPOD. The mean adherence rate was 65%. Most authors failed to report on missing data and actions to blind assessment of predictors. Thirteen models had an above-average performance for TRIPOD checklist adherence and area under the curve. CONCLUSION Although the average TRIPOD adherence rate for postoperative pancreatic fistula models after pancreatoduodenectomy was 65%, higher compared to other published models, it does not meet TRIPOD standards for transparency. This study identified 13 models that performed above average in TRIPOD adherence and area under the curve, which could be the appropriate models to be used in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahraa M Alhulaili
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ralph J Linnemann
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Larisa Dascau
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Rick G Pleijhuis
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sahakyan MA, Kleive D, Dille-Amdam RG, Kjeseth T, Waardal K, Edwin B, Nymo LS, Lassen K. The Role of Preoperative Inflammatory Markers in Pancreatectomy: a Norwegian Nationwide Cohort Study. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:1650-1659. [PMID: 37322265 PMCID: PMC10412490 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05726-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Preoperative inflammatory markers, such as Glasgow prognostic score, modified Glasgow prognostic score and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, were shown to be associated with prognosis in patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer. However, little is known about their predictive role in a Western population. METHODS The Norwegian National Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery (NORGAST) was used to capture all pancreatectomies performed within the study period (November 2015-April 2021). The association between the preoperative inflammatory markers and postoperative outcomes was studied. Their impact on survival was examined in patients operated for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS A total of 1554 patients underwent pancreatectomy in this period. Glasgow prognostic score, modified Glasgow prognostic score and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio were associated with severe complications (Accordion grade ≥ III) in the univariable but not in the multivariable analysis. C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, but not Glasgow prognostic score and modified Glasgow prognostic score, was linked to survival following pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. In the multivariable model, age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, ECOG score, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio and total pancreatectomy correlated with survival. Also, preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio was significantly associated with survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative Glasgow prognostic score, modified Glasgow prognostic score and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio have no role in predicting the complications after pancreatectomy. C-reactive protein to albumin ratio is a significant predictor for survival in ductal adenocarcinoma, yet its clinical relevance should be explored in conjunction with the pathology parameters and adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mushegh A Sahakyan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rachel G Dille-Amdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Trond Kjeseth
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kim Waardal
- Department of Acute and Digestive Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Linn S Nymo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT, the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kristoffer Lassen
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT, the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Bakker JK, Suurmeijer JA, Toennaer JGJ, Bonsing BA, Busch OR, van Eijck CH, de Hingh IH, de Meijer VE, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Stommel MW, Festen S, van der Harst E, Patijn G, Lips DJ, Den Dulk M, Bosscha K, Besselink MG, Kazemier G. Surgical Outcome After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma Compared with Other Periampullary Cancers: A Nationwide Audit Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2448-2455. [PMID: 36536196 PMCID: PMC10027630 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12701-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenocarcinoma could differ from pancreatoduodenectomy for other cancers, but large multicenter series are lacking. This study aimed to determine surgical outcome in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenocarcinoma, compared with other periampullary cancers, in a nationwide multicenter cohort. METHODS After pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer between 2014 and 2019, consecutive patients were included from the nationwide, mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. Patients were stratified by diagnosis. Baseline, treatment characteristics, and postoperative outcome were compared between groups. The association between diagnosis and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) was assessed via multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS Overall, 3113 patients, after pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer, were included in this study: 264 (8.5%) patients with duodenal adenocarcinomas and 2849 (91.5%) with other cancers. After pancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenocarcinoma, patients had higher rates of major complications (42.8% vs. 28.6%; p < 0.001), postoperative pancreatic fistula (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery [ISGPS] grade B/C; 23.1% vs. 13.4%; p < 0.001), complication-related intensive care admission (14.3% vs. 10.3%; p = 0.046), re-interventions (39.8% vs. 26.6%; p < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (5.7% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.025), and longer hospital stay (15 days vs. 11 days; p < 0.001) compared with pancreatoduodenectomy for other cancers. In multivariable analysis, duodenal adenocarcinoma was independently associated with major complications (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.27; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION Pancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenocarcinoma is associated with higher rates of major complications, pancreatic fistula, re-interventions, and in-hospital mortality compared with patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for other cancers. These findings should be considered in patient counseling and postoperative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob K de Bakker
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Annelie Suurmeijer
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen G J Toennaer
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Gijs Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stevens A, Meier J, Bhat A, Balentine C. Hospital Performance on Failure to Rescue Correlates With Likelihood of Home Discharge. J Surg Res 2023; 287:107-116. [PMID: 36893609 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Failure to rescue (FTR) (avoiding death after complications) has been proposed as a measure of hospital quality. Although surviving complications is important, not all rescues are created equal. Patients also place considerable values on being able to return home after surgery and resume their normal lives. From a systems standpoint, nonhome discharge to skilled nursing and other facilities is the biggest driver of Medicare costs. We wanted to determine whether hospitals' ability to keep patients alive after complications was associated with higher rates of home discharge. We hypothesized that hospitals with higher rescue rates would also be more likely to discharge patients home after surgery. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the nationwide inpatient sample. We included 1,358,041 patients ≥18 y old who had elective major surgery (general, vascular, orthopedic) at 3818 hospitals from 2013 to 2017. We predicted the correlation between a hospital's performance (rank) on FTR and its rank in terms of home discharge rate. RESULTS The cohort had a median age of 66 y (interquartile range [IQR] 58-73), and 77.9% of patients were Caucasian. Most patients (63.6%) were treated at urban teaching institutions. The surgical case mix included patients having colorectal (146,993 patients; 10.8%), pulmonary (52,334; 3.9%), pancreatic (13,635; 1.0%), hepatic (14,821; 1.1%), gastric (9182; 0.7%), esophageal (4494; 0.3%), peripheral vascular bypass (29,196; 2.2%), abdominal aneurysm repair (14,327; 1.1%), coronary artery bypass (61,976; 4.6%), hip replacement (356,400; 26.2%), and knee replacement (654,857; 48.2%) operations. The overall mortality was 0.3%, the average hospital complication rate was 15.9%, the median hospital rescue rate was 99% (IQR 70%-100%), and the median hospital rate of home discharge was 80% (IQR 74%-85%).There was a small but positive correlation between hospitals' performance on the FTR metric and the likelihood of home discharge after surgery (r = 0.0453; P = 0.006). When considering hospital rates of discharge to home following a postoperative complication, there was a similar correlation between rescue rates and probability of home discharge (r = 0.0963; P < 0.001). However, on sensitivity analysis excluding orthopedic surgery, there was a stronger correlation between rescue rates and home discharge rate (r = 0.4047, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We found a small correlation between a hospital's ability to rescue patients from complication and that hospital's likelihood of discharging patients home after surgery. When excluding orthopedic operations from the analysis, this correlation strengthened. Our findings suggest that efforts to reduce mortality after complications will likely also help patients return home more frequently after complex surgery. However, more work needs to be done to identify successful programs and other patient and hospital factors that affect both rescue and home discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Stevens
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; VA North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, Texas; Surgical Center for Outcomes, Implementation, and Novel Interventions (S-COIN), Dallas, Texas.
| | - Jennie Meier
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; VA North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, Texas; Surgical Center for Outcomes, Implementation, and Novel Interventions (S-COIN), Dallas, Texas
| | - Archana Bhat
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; VA North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, Texas; Surgical Center for Outcomes, Implementation, and Novel Interventions (S-COIN), Dallas, Texas
| | - Courtney Balentine
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; VA North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, Texas; Surgical Center for Outcomes, Implementation, and Novel Interventions (S-COIN), Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Masuda H, Kotecha K, Maitra R, Maher R, Mittal A, Samra JS. The role of repeated imaging in detecting complications in the post-operative period following pancreaticoduodenectomy: Serial CT imaging post-pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:1314-1321. [PMID: 36782399 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage is a potentially life-threatening complication. Delay in the detection and subsequent management of complications contribute significantly to post-operative mortality and morbidity associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS All patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at an Australian-based tertiary referral center between 2017 and 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. We identified those patients who suffered a post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage and further analysed those patients who had their post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage identified on repeated CT imaging performed within 24 h of their previous CT scan. RESULTS A total of 232 pancreaticoduodenectomies were identified for analysis during the study period, of which 23 patients (9.9%) suffered a post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage. We present four patients who had their post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage identified on repeat CT scan in the setting of a recent (within 24 h) CT scan which showed no evidence of active haemorrhage or pseudoaneurysm formation. All patients received prompt and definitive endovascular management through stent insertion or coil embolization resulting in successful cessation of bleeding. Three patients made an uncomplicated recovery thereafter. Unfortunately, one patient died as a complication of the bleed despite early and definitive endovascular intervention. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the importance of having a low threshold for repeated CT imaging in the post-pancreaticoduodenectomy setting, particularly when there remains a high index of suspicion clinically for a post-operative complication, even in the context of previous benign imaging. Given the complexity of pancreaticoduodenectomy, we believe early detection with liberal imaging allows the best chance at successfully managing the morbidity and mortality associated in the post-pancreaticoduodenectomy setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiro Masuda
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Krishna Kotecha
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rudra Maitra
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Maher
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital and North Shore Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anubhav Mittal
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jaswinder S Samra
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Magnin J, Bernard A, Cottenet J, Lequeu JB, Ortega-Deballon P, Quantin C, Facy O. Impact of hospital volume in liver surgery on postoperative mortality and morbidity: nationwide study. Br J Surg 2023; 110:441-448. [PMID: 36724824 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This nationwide retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate impact of hospital volume and influence of liver transplantation activity on postoperative mortality and failure to rescue after liver surgery. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent liver resection between 2011 and 2019 using a nationwide database. A threshold of surgical activities from which in-hospital mortality declines was calculated. Hospitals were divided into high- and low-volume centres. Main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and failure to rescue. RESULTS Among 39 286 patients included, the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.8 per cent. The activity volume threshold from which in-hospital mortality declined was 25 hepatectomies. High-volume centres (more than 25 resections per year) had more postoperative complications but a lower rate of in-hospital mortality (2.6 versus 3 per cent; P < 0.001) and failure to rescue (5 versus 6.3 per cent; P < 0.001), in particular related to specific complications (liver failure, biliary complications, vascular complications) (5.5 versus 7.6 per cent; P < 0.001). Liver transplantation activity did not have an impact on these outcomes. CONCLUSION From more than 25 liver resections per year, rates of in-hospital mortality and failure to rescue declined. Management of specific postoperative complications appeared to be better in high-volume centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Magnin
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Alain Bernard
- Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Investigation Centre, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.,Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Jonathan Cottenet
- Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Investigation Centre, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Lequeu
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Pablo Ortega-Deballon
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Catherine Quantin
- Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Investigation Centre, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Facy
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kokkinakis S, Kritsotakis EI, Maliotis N, Karageorgiou I, Chrysos E, Lasithiotakis K. Complications of modern pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:527-537. [PMID: 35513962 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the past decades, the perioperative management of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has undergone major changes worldwide. This review aimed to systematically determine the burden of complications of PD performed in the last 10 years. DATA SOURCES A systematic review was conducted in PubMed for randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting postoperative complications in at least 100 PDs from January 2010 to April 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool for randomized studies and the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Pooled complication rates were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS A total of 20 randomized and 49 observational studies reporting 63 229 PDs were reviewed. Mean MINORS score showed a high risk of bias in non-randomized studies, while one quarter of the randomized studies were assessed to have high risk of bias. Pooled incidences of 30-day mortality, overall complications and serious complications were 1.7% (95% CI: 0.9%-2.9%; I2 = 95.4%), 54.7% (95% CI: 46.4%-62.8%; I2 = 99.4%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 21.8%-29.4%; I2= 92.9%), respectively. Clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk was 14.3% (95% CI: 12.4%-16.3%; I2 = 92.0%) and mean length of stay was 14.8 days (95% CI: 13.6-16.1; I2 = 99.3%). Meta-regression partially attributed the observed heterogeneity to the country of origin of the study, the study design and the American Society of Anesthesiologists class. CONCLUSIONS Pooled complication rates estimated in this study may be used to counsel patients scheduled to undergo a PD and to set benchmarks against which centers can audit their practice. However, cautious interpretation is necessary due to substantial heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stamatios Kokkinakis
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete 71110, Greece
| | - Evangelos I Kritsotakis
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Division of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete 71110, Greece
| | - Neofytos Maliotis
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete 71110, Greece
| | - Ioannis Karageorgiou
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete 71110, Greece
| | - Emmanuel Chrysos
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete 71110, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Lasithiotakis
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete 71110, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy has improved over time. This progress is likely related to advancements in failure to rescue (FTR-the percentage of patients who die after developing a major complication). Several factors associated with FTR include patient-specific risks, development of certain postoperative complications, surgeon-specific factors, hospital-specific factors, rescue techniques, and regional differences. Efforts should be made to explore additional factors such as the influence of safety culture in the postoperative setting. Improvement in FTR may be better explored through randomized controlled postoperative management trials. In stable patients, management of complications by interventional radiology is preferred over reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Gleeson
- University of Edinburgh and Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Scotland UK.
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, 195 Little Albany Street, ET 834, New Brunswick, NJ 09083, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ratnayake B, Pendharkar SA, Connor S, Koea J, Sarfati D, Dennett E, Pandanaboyana S, Windsor JA. Patient volume and clinical outcome after pancreatic cancer resection: A contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2022; 172:273-283. [PMID: 35034796 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer remains a highly fatal disease with a 5-year overall survival of less than 10%. In seeking to improve clinical outcomes, there is ongoing debate about the weight that should be given to patient volume in centralization models. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the relationship between patient volume and clinical outcome after pancreatic resection for cancer in the contemporary literature. METHODS The Google Scholar, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from February 2015 until June 2021 for articles reporting patient volume and outcomes after pancreatic cancer resection. RESULTS There were 46 eligible studies over a 6-year period comprising 526,344 patients. The median defined annual patient volume thresholds varied: low-volume 0 (range 0-9), medium-volume 9 (range 3-29), high-volume 19 (range 9-97), and very-high-volume 28 (range 17-60) patients. The latter 2 were associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality (P < .001), 90-day mortality (P < .001), overall postoperative morbidity (P = .005), failure to rescue rate (P = .006), and R0 resection rate (P = .008) compared with very-low/low-volume hospitals. Centralization was associated with lower 30-day mortality in 3 out of 5 studies, while postoperative morbidity was similar in 4 out of 4 studies. Median survival was longer in patients traveling greater distance for pancreatic resection in 2 out of 3 studies. Median and 5-year survival did not differ between urban and rural settings. CONCLUSION The contemporary literature confirms a strong relationship between patient volume and clinical outcome for pancreatic cancer resection despite expected bias toward more complex surgery in high-volume centers. These outcomes include lower mortality, morbidity, failure-to-rescue, and positive resection margin rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bathiya Ratnayake
- Surgical and Translational Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand; HBP/Upper GI Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. https://twitter.com/ProfJohnWindsor
| | - Sayali A Pendharkar
- Surgical and Translational Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Saxon Connor
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jonathan Koea
- Upper GI Unit, Northshore Hospital, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Diana Sarfati
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Cancer Control Agency, Te Aho O Te Kahu, Ministry of Health, New Zealand
| | - Elizabeth Dennett
- Cancer Control Agency, Te Aho O Te Kahu, Ministry of Health, New Zealand
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - John A Windsor
- Surgical and Translational Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand; HBP/Upper GI Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Uppal A, Kothari AN, Scally CP, Roland CL, Bednarski BK, Katz MHG, Vauthey JN, Chang GJ. Adoption of Telemedicine for Postoperative Follow-Up After Inpatient Cancer-Related Surgery. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1091-e1099. [PMID: 35263166 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant changes in health care delivery, including the rapid adoption of telemedicine across multiple specialties and practice environments. This includes postoperative visits (POV), despite limited data on outcomes following these telemedicine POV. We sought to determine whether these types of visits successfully identify and address postoperative complications when compared with in-person POV. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective inpatient cancer-related surgery from March 2020 through December 2020. The exposure variable was type of POV (telemedicine v in-person). The primary outcome was unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days, and secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, length of stay of first readmission, and mortality. RESULTS Five-hundred thirty-five patients underwent elective inpatient operations and met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 98 (18.5%) had an initial telemedicine POV. There was no difference in 90-day readmission on the basis of POV type (16.3% telemedicine v 16.5% in-person, P = .99). Reasons for readmission did not differ between patients who underwent a telemedicine POV compared with in-person POV (all P > .05). After adjustment for patients' demographic and clinical factors, telemedicine POV was not associated with 90-day readmission (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.70; P = .77). CONCLUSION Telemedicine POV use adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic did not increase risk of readmission when compared with in-person visits following inpatient oncologic surgery. These data can help inform policy on the continued use and application of telemedicine after the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhineet Uppal
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of Surgery, Houston, TX
| | - Anai N Kothari
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, Houston, TX.,Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Madison, WI
| | - Christopher P Scally
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, Houston, TX
| | - Christina L Roland
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, Houston, TX
| | - Brian K Bednarski
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of Surgery, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, Houston, TX
| | - Jean-Nicholas Vauthey
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, Houston, TX
| | - George J Chang
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of Surgery, Houston, TX
| | -
- Data-Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) Team, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Beek DJ, Takkenkamp TJ, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, de Kleine RHJ, Walenkamp AME, Klaase JM, Nijkamp MW, Valk GD, Molenaar IQ, Hagendoorn J, van Santvoort HC, Borel Rinkes IHM, Hoogwater FJH, Vriens MR. Risk factors for complications after surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery 2022; 172:127-136. [PMID: 35341591 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The choice for the type of procedure is influenced by the expected oncological benefit and the anticipated risk of procedure-specific complications. Few studies have focused on complications in these patients. This cohort study aimed to assess complications and risk factors after resections of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS Patients undergoing resection of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor were identified within 2 centers of excellence. Complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index. Logistic regression was performed to compare surgical procedures with adjustment for potential confounders (Clavien-Dindo ≥3). RESULTS The cohort comprised 123 patients, including 12 enucleations, 50 distal pancreatectomies, 51 pancreatoduodenectomies, and 10 total/combined pancreatectomies. Mortality was 0.8%, a severe complication occurred in 41.5%, and the failure-to-rescue rate was 2.0%. The median comprehensive complication index was 22.6 (0-100); the comprehensive complication index increased after more extensive resections. After adjustment, a pancreatoduodenectomy, as compared to a distal pancreatectomy, increased the risk for a severe complication (odds ratio 3.13 [95% confidence interval 1.32-7.41]). Of the patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 or von Hippel-Lindau, 51.9% developed a severe complication vs 38.5% with sporadic disease. After major resections, morbidity was significantly higher in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1/von Hippel-Lindau (comprehensive complication index 45.1 vs 28.9, P = .029). CONCLUSION Surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is associated with a high rate of complications but low failure-to-rescue in centers of excellence. Complications are procedure-specific. Major resections in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1/von Hippel-Lindau appear to increase the risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk-Jan van Beek
- Department of Endocrine Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tim J Takkenkamp
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Edgar M Wong-Lun-Hing
- Department of Endocrine Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruben H J de Kleine
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemiek M E Walenkamp
- Department of Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten W Nijkamp
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerlof D Valk
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Endocrine Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik J H Hoogwater
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Menno R Vriens
- Department of Endocrine Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Is routine CT scan after pancreaticoduodenectomy a useful tool in the early detection of complications? A single center retrospective analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:2801-2810. [PMID: 35752718 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02599-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The clinical impact of routine CT imaging after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has not been properly investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of routine CT scan after PD for the detection of postoperative complications. METHODS Prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing PD and receiving routine postoperative CT imaging were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was accuracy of CT imaging in identifying major complications. The secondary endpoint was identification of preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with severe complications. A subgroup analysis of CT scan accuracy in identifying severe complications in patients stratified by fistula risk score (FRS) and presence of early clinical alterations was also performed. RESULTS A total of 145 patients were included. Routine CT scan had low specificity (Sp = 0.36) and high sensitivity (Sn = 0.98) for predicting major complications, with an accuracy of 0.57. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, only fistula moderate-high FRS (p = 0.029) was independently associated with severe complications. In patients with negligible-low FRS, CT scan showed a Sp of 0.63 and a Sn of 1.0 with an accuracy of 0.69. In patients with moderate-high FRS, CT scan had a Sp of 0.19, a Sn of 0.97 and an accuracy of 0.5. In the 20 (14%) patients with negligible-low FRS and no clinical alterations, no deaths or readmissions occurred regardless of CT findings, while one severe complication occurred in the positive CT scan group. In all other groups, no deaths or readmissions occurred in case of negative CT, with only one severe complication in the moderate-high FRS group with clinical alterations. In case of positive CT, the rate of severe complications was 47% in case of negligible-low FRS and clinical alterations, 40% in case of moderate-high FRS with no clinical alterations, and 45% in case of moderate-high FRS and clinical alterations. CONCLUSIONS Routine postoperative CT scan after PD should not be performed in patients with negligible-low FRS and no clinical alterations. In all other patients, a negative CT scan appears to be highly accurate in identifying patients who will have an uneventful course and who could benefit from early discharge.
Collapse
|
22
|
Papageorge MV, de Geus SWL, Woods AP, Ng SC, McAneny D, Tseng JF, Kenzik KM, Sachs TE. The impact of upper gastrointestinal surgical volume on short term pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the SEER-Medicare population. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:868-874. [PMID: 34879991 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at low volume PD hospitals with high volume for other complex operations have comparable outcomes to high volume PD centers. We evaluated the impact of upper gastrointestinal operations (UGI) hospital volume on the outcomes of elderly, high risk patients undergoing PD. METHODS Patients >65 years old who underwent PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified from SEER-Medicare (2008-2015). Four volume cohorts were created using PD tertiles and UGI median: low (1st tertile PD), mixed-low (2nd tertile PD, low UGI), mixed-high (2nd tertile PD, high UGI) and high (3rd tertile PD). Multivariable logistic and negative binomial regression assessed short-term complications. RESULTS In total, 2717 patients were identified with a median age of 74.5 years. Patients treated at low, mixed-low and mixed-high volume hospitals, versus high volume, had higher risk of short-term complications, including major complications (low: OR 1.441, 95%CI 1.165-1.783; mixed-low: OR 1.374, 95%CI 1.085-1.740; mixed-high: OR 1.418, 95%CI 1.098-1.832) and 90-day mortality (low: OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.454-3.209; mixed-low: OR 2.068, 95%CI 1.347-3.175; mixed-high: OR 1.96, 95%CI 1.245-3.086). CONCLUSION Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who are older and more medically complex benefit from undergoing surgery at high volume PD centers, independent of the operative experience of that center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna V Papageorge
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medical, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susanna W L de Geus
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medical, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alison P Woods
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medical, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sing Chau Ng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medical, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David McAneny
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medical, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer F Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medical, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelly M Kenzik
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medical, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Teviah E Sachs
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medical, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Beal EW. Algorithm-based management of complications after pancreatic resection. Lancet 2022; 399:1846-1847. [PMID: 35490690 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00626-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza W Beal
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Smits FJ, Henry AC, Besselink MG, Busch OR, van Eijck CH, Arntz M, Bollen TL, van Delden OM, van den Heuvel D, van der Leij C, van Lienden KP, Moelker A, Bonsing BA, Borel Rinkes IH, Bosscha K, van Dam RM, Derksen WJM, den Dulk M, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, de Haas RJ, Hagendoorn J, van der Harst E, de Hingh IH, Kazemier G, van der Kolk M, Liem M, Lips DJ, Luyer MD, de Meijer VE, Mieog JS, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Patijn GA, Te Riele WW, Roos D, Schreinemakers JM, Stommel MWJ, Wit F, Zonderhuis BA, Daamen LA, van Werkhoven CH, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC. Algorithm-based care versus usual care for the early recognition and management of complications after pancreatic resection in the Netherlands: an open-label, nationwide, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2022; 399:1867-1875. [PMID: 35490691 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00182-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early recognition and management of postoperative complications, before they become clinically relevant, can improve postoperative outcomes for patients, especially for high-risk procedures such as pancreatic resection. METHODS We did an open-label, nationwide, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial that included all patients having pancreatic resection during a 22-month period in the Netherlands. In this trial design, all 17 centres that did pancreatic surgery were randomly allocated for the timing of the crossover from usual care (the control group) to treatment given in accordance with a multimodal, multidisciplinary algorithm for the early recognition and minimally invasive management of postoperative complications (the intervention group). Randomisation was done by an independent statistician using a computer-generated scheme, stratified to ensure that low-medium-volume centres alternated with high-volume centres. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment. A smartphone app was designed that incorporated the algorithm and included the daily evaluation of clinical and biochemical markers. The algorithm determined when to do abdominal CT, radiological drainage, start antibiotic treatment, and remove abdominal drains. After crossover, clinicians were trained in how to use the algorithm during a 4-week wash-in period; analyses comparing outcomes between the control group and the intervention group included all patients other than those having pancreatic resection during this wash-in period. The primary outcome was a composite of bleeding that required invasive intervention, organ failure, and 90-day mortality, and was assessed by a masked adjudication committee. This trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, NL6671. FINDINGS From Jan 8, 2018, to Nov 9, 2019, all 1805 patients who had pancreatic resection in the Netherlands were eligible for and included in this study. 57 patients who underwent resection during the wash-in phase were excluded from the primary analysis. 1748 patients (885 receiving usual care and 863 receiving algorithm-centred care) were included. The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the algorithm-centred care group than in the usual care group (73 [8%] of 863 patients vs 124 [14%] of 885 patients; adjusted risk ratio [RR] 0·48, 95% CI 0·38-0·61; p<0·0001). Among patients treated according to the algorithm, compared with patients who received usual care there was a decrease in bleeding that required intervention (47 [5%] patients vs 51 [6%] patients; RR 0·65, 0·42-0·99; p=0·046), organ failure (39 [5%] patients vs 92 [10%] patients; 0·35, 0·20-0·60; p=0·0001), and 90-day mortality (23 [3%] patients vs 44 [5%] patients; 0·42, 0·19-0·92; p=0·029). INTERPRETATION The algorithm for the early recognition and minimally invasive management of complications after pancreatic resection considerably improved clinical outcomes compared with usual care. This difference included an approximate 50% reduction in mortality at 90 days. FUNDING The Dutch Cancer Society and UMC Utrecht.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Jasmijn Smits
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Claire Henry
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mark Arntz
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Thomas L Bollen
- Department of Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniel van den Heuvel
- Department of Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Inne H Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Wouter J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Festen
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robbert J de Haas
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marion van der Kolk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Mike Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Misha D Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - J Sven Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wouter W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Daphne Roos
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Fennie Wit
- Department of Surgery, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, Netherlands
| | - Babs A Zonderhuis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - C Henri van Werkhoven
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hunger R, Seliger B, Ogino S, Mantke R. Mortality factors in pancreatic surgery: A systematic review. How important is the hospital volume? Int J Surg 2022; 101:106640. [PMID: 35525416 PMCID: PMC9239346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND How the extent of confounding adjustment impact (hospital) volume-outcome relationships in published studies on pancreatic cancer surgery is unknown. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted for studies that investigated the relationship between volume and outcome using a risk adjustment procedure by querying the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Livivo, Medline and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (last query: 2020/09/16). Importance of risk-adjusting covariates were assessed by effect size (odds ratio, OR) and statistical significance. The impact of covariate adjustment on hospital (or surgeon) volume effects was analyzed by regression and meta-regression models. RESULTS We identified 87 studies (75 based on administrative data) with nearly 1 million patients undergoing pancreatic surgery that included in total 71 covariates for risk adjustment. Of these, 33 (47%) had statistically significant effects on short-term mortality and 23 (32%) did not, while for 15 (21%) factors neither effect size nor statistical significance were reported. The most important covariates for short term mortality were patient-specific factors. Concerning the covariates, single comorbidities (OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 3.3 to 6.3) had the strongest impact on mortality followed by hospital volume (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 2.5 to 3.3) and the procedure (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.9 to 2.5). Among the single comorbidities, coagulopathy (OR: 4.5, 95% CI: 2.8 to 7.2) and dementia (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 2.2 to 8.0) had the strongest influence on mortality. The regression analysis showed a significant decrease hospital volume effect with an increasing number of covariates considered (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.10 to -0.03, P < 0.001), while such a relationship was not observed for surgeon volume (P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrated a significant inverse relationship between the extent of risk adjustment and the volume effect, suggesting the presence of unmeasured confounding and overestimation of volume effects. However, the conclusions are limited in that only the number of included covariates was considered, but not the effect size of the non-included covariates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Hunger
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Seliger
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Medical Immunology, Halle, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Rene Mantke
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany; Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Papageorge MV, de Geus SWL, Woods AP, Ng SC, McAneny D, Tseng JF, Kenzik KM, Sachs TE. The Effect of Hospital Versus Surgeon Volume on Short-Term Patient Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a SEER-Medicare Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2444-2451. [PMID: 34994887 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11196-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The volume-outcome relationship has been well-established for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). It remains unclear if this is primarily driven by hospital volume or individual surgeon experience. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the relationship of hospital and surgeon volume on short-term outcomes of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing PD. METHODS Patients >65 years of age who underwent PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (2008-2015). Analyses were stratified by hospital volume and then surgeon volume, creating four volume cohorts: low-low (low hospital, low surgeon), low-high (low hospital, high surgeon), high-low (high hospital, low surgeon), high-high (high hospital, high surgeon). Propensity scores were created for the odds of undergoing surgery with high-volume surgeons. Following matching, multivariable analysis was used to assess the impact of surgeon volume on outcomes within each hospital volume cohort. RESULTS In total, 2450 patients were identified: 54.3% were treated at high-volume hospitals (27.0% low-volume surgeons, 73.0% high-volume surgeons) and 45.7% were treated at low-volume hospitals (76.9% low-volume surgeons, 23.1% high-volume surgeons). On matched multivariable analysis, there were no significant differences in the risk of major complications, 90-day mortality, and 30-day readmission based on surgeon volume within the low and high hospital volume cohorts. CONCLUSION Compared with surgeon volume, hospital volume is a more significant factor in predicting short-term outcomes after PD. This suggests that a focus on resources and care pathways, in combination with volume metrics, is more likely to achieve high-quality care for patients undergoing PD across all hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna V Papageorge
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MD, USA
| | - Susanna W L de Geus
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MD, USA
| | - Alison P Woods
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MD, USA.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sing Chau Ng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MD, USA
| | - David McAneny
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer F Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MD, USA
| | - Kelly M Kenzik
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MD, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Teviah E Sachs
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Aitken RJ. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Australia: a national quality improvement clinical registry is long overdue. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:6-8. [PMID: 35212115 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R James Aitken
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ahola R, Siiki A, Rinta-Kiikka I, Laitinen I, Antila A, Jämsen E, Laukkarinen J. Preoperative measures predicting outcome after pancreatic resection in aged patients. Scand J Surg 2022; 111:14574969221083136. [PMID: 35333104 DOI: 10.1177/14574969221083136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE High-risk surgery on aged patients raises challenging ethical and clinical issues. The aim of this study was to analyze the preoperative factors associated with severe complications and returning home after pancreatic resection among patients aged ⩾ 75 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged ⩾ 75 years undergoing pancreatic resection in 2012-2019 were retrospectively searched from the hospital database. Preoperative indices (Clinical Frailty Scale, Skeletal Muscle Index, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk for severe complications) were determined. Postoperative outcome was evaluated by incidence of Clavien-Dindo 3b-5 complications, rate of returning home, and 1-year survival. RESULTS A total of 95 patients were included. American Society of Anesthesiologists Class 3-4 covered 50%, Clinical Frailty Scale > 3 22%, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 6 53%, and a sarcopenic Skeletal Muscle Index 51% of these patients. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk for severe complications was higher than average among 21% of patients. Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index showed high risk among 3% of them. In total, 19 patients (20%) experienced a severe (Clavien-Dindo 3b-5) complication. However, 30- and 90-day mortality was 2.1%. Preoperative indices were not associated with severe complications. Most patients (79%) had returned home within 8 weeks of surgery. Not returning home was associated with severe complications (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS The short-term outcome after pancreatic resection of fit older patients is similar to that of younger, unselected patient groups. In these selected patients, the commonly used preoperative indexes were not associated with severe complications or returning home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reea Ahola
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery Tampere University Hospital Teiskontie 35 Tampere 33210 Finland
| | - Antti Siiki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Ismo Laitinen
- Central Hospital of South Ostrobothnia, Seinäjoki, Finland
| | - Anne Antila
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Esa Jämsen
- Department of Geriatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Johanna Laukkarinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hyer JM, Beane JD, Spolverato G, Tsilimigras DI, Diaz A, Paro A, Dalmacy D, Pawlik TM. Trends in Textbook Outcomes over Time: Are Optimal Outcomes Following Complex Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer Increasing? J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:50-59. [PMID: 34506022 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05129-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of composite measures like "textbook outcome" (TO) may provide a more accurate measure of surgical quality. We sought to determine if TO has improved over time and to characterize the association of achieving a TO with trends in survival among patients undergoing complex gastrointestinal surgery for cancer. METHODS Medicare beneficiaries who underwent pancreas, liver, or colon resection for a cancer diagnosis between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the SEER-Medicare database. Rates of TO (no complication, extended length of stay, 90-day readmission, or 90-day mortality) were assessed over time. RESULTS Among 94,329 patients, 6765 (7.2%), 1985 (2.1%), and 85,579 (90.7%) patients underwent resection for primary pancreatic, hepatic, or colon cancer, respectively. In total, 53,464 (56.7%) patients achieved a TO; achievement of TO varied by procedure (pancreatectomy: 48.1% vs. hepatectomy: 55.2% vs. colectomy: 57.4%, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients achieving a textbook outcome increased over time for all patients (2004-2007, 53.3% vs. 2008-2011, 56.5% vs. 2012-2016, 60.1%) (5-year increase: OR 1.16 95%CI 1.13-1.18) (p < 0.001). Survival at 1-year following pancreatic, liver, or colon resection for cancer had improved over time among both patients who did and did not achieve a postoperative TO. TO was independently associated with a marked reduction in hazard of death (HR 0.44, 95%CI 0.43-0.45). The association of TO and survival was consistent among patients stratified by procedure. CONCLUSION Less than two-thirds of patients undergoing complex gastrointestinal surgery for a malignant indication achieved a TO. The likelihood of achieving a TO increased over time and was associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Madison Hyer
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joal D Beane
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Adrian Diaz
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alessandro Paro
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Djhenne Dalmacy
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Evolving pancreatic cancer treatment: From diagnosis to healthcare management. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103571. [PMID: 34923121 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is still the worst among solid tumors. In this review, a panel of experts addressed the main unanswered questions about the clinical management of this disease, with the aim of providing practical decision support for physicians. On the basis of the evidence available from the literature, the main topics concerning pancreatic cancer are discussed: the diagnosis, as the need for a pathological characterization and the role for germ-line and somatic molecular profiling; the therapeutic management of resectable disease, as the role of upfront surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the post-operative restaging and the optimal timing foradjuvant chemotherapy, the management of the borderline resectable and locally advanced disease; the metastatic disease and the role of surgery for the management of patients with isolated metastasis and the use of biomarkers of metastatic potential; the role of supportive care and the healthcare management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
31
|
Linnemann RJA, Kooijman BJL, van der Hilst CS, Sprakel J, Buis CI, Kruijff S, Klaase JM. The Costs of Complications and Unplanned Readmissions after Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors: Results from a Single Academic Center. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246271. [PMID: 34944890 PMCID: PMC8699101 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Complications lead to unplanned readmissions (UR) and are reported to be associated with a two- to threefold increase in hospital admission costs. Since healthcare costs are increasing worldwide, cost containment is the major challenge for future healthcare. In the literature, there are only a few studies that analysed hospital costs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). In this study, we aimed to create an understanding of the costs of complications and UR in patients who underwent a PD. Abstract Background/Objectives: Complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) lead to unplanned readmissions (UR), with a two- to threefold increase in admission costs. In this study, we aimed to create an understanding of the costs of complications and UR in this patient group. Furthermore, we aimed to generate a detailed cost overview that can be used to build a theoretical model to calculate the cost efficacy for prehabilitation. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (DPCA) database of patients who underwent a PD at our institute between 2013 and 2017. The total costs of the index hospital admission and UR related to the PD were collected. Results: Of the 160 patients; 35 patients (22%) had an uncomplicated course; 87 patients (54%) had minor complications, and 38 patients (24%) had severe complications. Median costs for an uncomplicated course were EUR 25.682, and for a complicated course, EUR 32.958 (p = 0.001). The median costs for minor complications were EUR 30.316, and for major complications, EUR 42.664 (p = 0.001). Costs were related to the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The median costs of patients with one or more UR were EUR 41.199. Conclusions: Complications after PD led to a EUR 4.634–EUR 16.982 (18–66%) increase in hospital costs. A UR led to a cost increase of EUR 12.567 (44%). Since hospital costs are directly related to the CCI, reduction in complications will lead to cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph J. A. Linnemann
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Billiary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.J.A.L.); (B.J.L.K.); (J.S.); (C.I.B.)
| | - Bob J. L. Kooijman
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Billiary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.J.A.L.); (B.J.L.K.); (J.S.); (C.I.B.)
| | - Christian S. van der Hilst
- Department of Strategic Analytics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Joost Sprakel
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Billiary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.J.A.L.); (B.J.L.K.); (J.S.); (C.I.B.)
| | - Carlijn I. Buis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Billiary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.J.A.L.); (B.J.L.K.); (J.S.); (C.I.B.)
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Joost M. Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Billiary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.J.A.L.); (B.J.L.K.); (J.S.); (C.I.B.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Elfrink AKE, Olthof PB, Swijnenburg RJ, den Dulk M, de Boer MT, Mieog JSD, Hagendoorn J, Kazemier G, van den Boezem PB, Rijken AM, Liem MSL, Leclercq WKG, Kuhlmann KFD, Marsman HA, Ijzermans JNM, van Duijvendijk P, Erdmann JI, Kok NFM, Grünhagen DJ, Klaase JM. Factors associated with failure to rescue after liver resection and impact on hospital variation: a nationwide population-based study. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1837-1848. [PMID: 34090804 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to rescue (FTR) is defined as postoperative complications leading to mortality. This nationwide study aimed to assess factors associated with FTR and hospital variation in FTR after liver surgery. METHODS All patients who underwent liver resection between 2014 and 2017 in the Netherlands were included. FTR was defined as in-hospital or 30-day mortality after complications Dindo grade ≥3a. Variables associated with FTR and nationwide hospital variation were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Of 4961 patients included, 3707 (74.4%) underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases, 379 (7.6%) for other metastases, 526 (10.6%) for hepatocellular carcinoma and 349 (7.0%) for biliary cancer. Thirty-day major morbidity was 11.5%. Overall mortality was 2.3%. FTR was 19.1%. Age 65-80 (aOR: 2.86, CI:1.01-12.0, p = 0.049), ASA 3+ (aOR:2.59, CI: 1.66-4.02, p < 0.001), liver cirrhosis (aOR:4.15, CI:1.81-9.22, p < 0.001), biliary cancer (aOR:3.47, CI: 1.73-6.96, p < 0.001), and major resection (aOR:6.46, CI: 3.91-10.9, p < 0.001) were associated with FTR. Postoperative liver failure (aOR: 26.9, CI: 14.6-51.2, p < 0.001), cardiac (aOR: 2.62, CI: 1.27-5.29, p = 0.008) and thromboembolic complications (aOR: 2.49, CI: 1.16-5.22, p = 0.017) were associated with FTR. After case-mix correction, no hospital variation in FTR was observed. CONCLUSION FTR is influenced by patient demographics, disease and procedural burden. Prevention of postoperative liver failure, cardiac and thromboembolic complications could decrease FTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur K E Elfrink
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke T de Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Center, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan N M Ijzermans
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yau HCV, Lester L, Johansson M. Transitioning to a high volume centre for Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy in Western Australia: a single centre experience. ANZ J Surg 2021; 92:86-91. [PMID: 34791763 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a curative resection for peri-ampullary tumours associated with high rates of peri-operative mortality and morbidity. The global trend is towards the establishment of high volume centres to reduce this. Australia faces geographical and population distribution challenges. Western Australia has centralized PD to two centres and we present the results of our institution in transitioning to a high volume centre. METHODS This was a prospective database of all PDs performed at our institution from 1 January 2005 to 2 April 2020. Mortality outcomes included peri-operative, 30 day and 90 day mortality. Complications, readmission and reinterventions at 90 days were recorded. The annual volume exceeded 20 from 2015. Outcomes prior to this were compared to characterize the transition to a high volume centre. RESULTS One hundred and twenty eight PDs were performed in Period 1 (1 January 2005-31 December 2014) and 170 in the high volume Period 2 (1 January 2015-2 April 2020). There was a non-statistically significant reduction in 90 day mortality in Period 2 (4.69% versus 1.18%, p = 0.06). There was a reduction in clinically significant post-operative pancreatic fistulas (31.25% versus 11.76%, p < 0.05), delayed gastric emptying (39.84% versus 22.35%, p < 0.05) and transfusion requirements (56.25% versus 17.65%, p < 0.05). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo III or greater) were reduced (30.47% versus 18.24%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Since establishing a high volume service, there was a reduction in post-operative complications and 90 day mortality. This is in line with outcomes from international centres and demonstrates the improvements that can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho-Cing Victor Yau
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Leanne Lester
- School of Human Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mikael Johansson
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pastrana Del Valle J, Mahvi DA, Fairweather M, Wang J, Clancy TE, Ashley SW, Urman RD, Whang EE, Gold JS. Associations of gender, race, and ethnicity with disparities in short-term adverse outcomes after pancreatic resection for cancer. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:646-657. [PMID: 34786728 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have identified disparities in pancreatic cancer treatment associated with gender, race, and ethnicity. There are limited data examining disparities in short-term adverse outcomes after pancreatic resection for cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate associations of gender, race, and ethnicity with morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resection for malignancy. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database was retrospectively reviewed. The χ2 test and Student's t-test were used for univariable analysis and hierarchical logistic regression for multivariable analysis. RESULTS Morbidity and major morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with male gender, Asian race, and Hispanic ethnicity, whereas 30-day mortality is associated with the male gender. Morbidity and major morbidity after distal pancreatectomy are associated with the male gender. Morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy is independently associated with male gender, Asian race, and Hispanic ethnicity; major morbidity is independently associated with male gender and Asian race, and mortality is independently associated with Hispanic ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS Gender, race, and ethnicity are independently associated with morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer; gender and race are independently associated with major morbidity; and ethnicity is independently associated with mortality. Further studies are warranted to determine the basis of these associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Pastrana Del Valle
- Department of Surgical Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Mahvi
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mark Fairweather
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jiping Wang
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas E Clancy
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stanley W Ashley
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward E Whang
- Department of Surgical Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason S Gold
- Department of Surgical Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nishio RT, Pacheco-Jr AM, Moricz AD, Silva RA. WHAT FACTORS CONTRIBUTE TO DELAYED GASTRIC EMPTYING AFTER DUODENOPANCREATECTOMY WITH PILORIC PRESERVATION? ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA 2021; 34:e1592. [PMID: 34669882 PMCID: PMC8521836 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background: The delay in gastric emptying is the second most frequent complication after duodenopancreatectomy with pyloric preservation, that increases hospitalization time and hospital costs.
Aim: To identify factors that contribute to the appearance the delay in this surgical procedure.
Method: Ninety-five patients were submitted to duodenopancreatectomy with pyloric preservation. After retrospective analysis of the medical records, it was observed that 60 had prolonged hospitalization due to complications. Thus, univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze predictors of delayed gastric emptying.
Results: Delay was present in 65% (n=39) and pancreatic fistula in 38.3% (n=23). Univariate analysis revealed that the presence of pancreatic complications (pancreatic fistula, p=0.01), other intracavitary complications with the appearance of abdominal collections (p=0.03) and hypoalbuminemia (p=0.06) were responsible, also confirmed by the multivariate analysis. In those who presented delay without a determined cause, it was observed that high levels of total bilirubin (p=0.01) and direct bilirubin (p=0.01) could be related to it.
Conclusion: The delay in gastric emptying in patients undergoing duodenopancreatectomy with pyloric preservation is due to intracavitary complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Tadashi Nishio
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - André de Moricz
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Dongen JC, Wismans LV, Suurmeijer JA, Besselink MG, de Wilde RF, Groot Koerkamp B, van Eijck CHJ. The effect of preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy on pancreatic fistula and other surgical complications after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1321-1331. [PMID: 34099372 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative chemo- or chemoradiotherapy is recommended for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative therapy on surgical complications in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies reporting on the rate of surgical complications after preoperative chemo- or chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery in pancreatic cancer patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade B/C POPF. Pooled odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS Forty-one comparative studies including 25,389 patients were included. Vascular resections were more often performed after preoperative therapy (29.4% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.001). Preoperative therapy was associated with a lower rate of grade B/C POPF as compared to immediate surgery (pooled OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.38-0.58). This reduction was mostly obtained by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.29-0.73), but not by preoperative chemotherapy alone (OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.59-1.16). No difference was demonstrated for major morbidity, mortality, postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying and overall morbidity. CONCLUSION Preoperative chemo- and chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer appears to be safe with respect to POPF and other surgical complications as compared to immediate surgery. The reduced rate of POPF appears to be attributable to preoperative chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelle C van Dongen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leonoor V Wismans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Annelie Suurmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This analysis aimed to compare failure to rescue (FTR) after pancreatoduodenectomy across the Atlantic. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA FTR, or mortality after development of a major complication, is a quality metric originally created to compare hospital results. FTR has been studied in North American and Northern European patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). However, a direct comparison of FTR after PD between North America and Northern Europe has not been performed. METHODS Patients who underwent PD in North America, the Netherlands, Sweden and Germany (GAPASURG dataset) were identified from their respective registries (2014-17). Patients who developed a major complication defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥3 or developed a grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) were included. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared between patients with and without FTR. Variables significant on univariable analysis were entered into a logistic regression for FTR. RESULTS Major complications occurred in 6188 of 22,983 patients (26.9%) after PD, and 504 (8.1%) patients had FTR. North American and Northern European patients with complications differed, and rates of FTR were lower in North America (5.4% vs 12%, P < 0.001). Fourteen factors from univariable analysis contributing to differences in patients who developed FTR were included in a logistic regression. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with FTR were age, American Society of Anesthesiology ≥3, Northern Europe, POPF, organ failure, life-threatening complication, nonradiologic intervention, and reoperation. CONCLUSIONS Older patients with severe systemic diseases are more difficult to rescue. Failure to rescue is more common in Northern Europe than North America. In stable patients, management of complications by interventional radiology is preferred over reoperation.
Collapse
|
38
|
Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Following Emergency Department Admission: Understanding Poor Outcomes and Disparities in Care. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1261-1270. [PMID: 32378096 PMCID: PMC7644583 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04614-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of emergency department admission prior to pancreatic resection on perioperative outcomes is not well described. We compared patients who underwent pancreatic cancer surgery following admission through the emergency department (ED-surgery) with patients receiving elective pancreatic cancer surgery (elective) and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer over 5 years (2008-2012). Demographics and hospital characteristics were assessed, along with perioperative outcomes and disposition status. RESULTS A total of 8158 patients were identified, of which 516 (6.3%) underwent surgery after admission through the ED. ED-surgery patients were more often socioeconomically disadvantaged (non-White 39% vs. 18%, Medicaid or uninsured 24% vs. 7%, from lowest income area 33% vs. 21%; all p < .0001), had higher comorbidity (Elixhauser score > 6: 44% vs. 26%, p < .0001), and often had pancreatectomy performed at sites with lower annual case volume (< 7 resections/year: 53% vs. 24%, p < .0001). ED-surgery patients were less likely to be discharged home after surgery (70% vs. 82%, p < .0001) and had higher mortality (7.4% vs. 3.5%, p < .0001). On multivariate analysis, ED-surgery was independently associated with a lower likelihood of being discharged home (aOR 0.55 (95%CI 0.43-0.70)). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing pancreatectomy following ED admission experience worse outcomes compared with those who undergo surgery after elective admission. The excess of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in this group suggests factors other than clinical considerations alone drive this decision. This study demonstrates the need to consider presenting patient circumstances and preoperative oncologic coordination to reduce disparities and improve outcomes for pancreatic cancer surgery.
Collapse
|
39
|
Partelli S, Sclafani F, Barbu ST, Beishon M, Bonomo P, Braz G, de Braud F, Brunner T, Cavestro GM, Crul M, Trill MD, Ferollà P, Herrmann K, Karamitopoulou E, Neuzillet C, Orsi F, Seppänen H, Torchio M, Valenti D, Zamboni G, Zins M, Costa A, Poortmans P. European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 99:102208. [PMID: 34238640 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC) are written by experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care in Europe. They give patients, health professionals, managers and policymakers a guide to essential care throughout the patient journey. Pancreatic cancer is an increasing cause of cancer mortality and has wide variation in treatment and care in Europe. It is a major healthcare burden and has complex diagnosis and treatment challenges. Care must be carried out only in pancreatic cancer units or centres that have a core multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an extended team of health professionals detailed here. Such units are far from universal in European countries. To meet European aspirations for comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations must consider the requirements in this paper, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis, to treatment, to survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Partelli
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO); IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Sclafani
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sorin Traian Barbu
- Pancreatic Cancer Europe (PCE); Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Marc Beishon
- Cancer World, European School of Oncology (ESO), Milan, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Flims Alumni Club (FAC); Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Graça Braz
- European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS); Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI); IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Brunner
- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO); Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Giulia Martina Cavestro
- European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG); IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mirjam Crul
- European Society of Oncology Pharmacy (ESOP); Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Netherlands
| | - Maria Die Trill
- International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS); ATRIUM: Psycho-Oncology & Clinical Psychology, Madrid, Spain
| | - Piero Ferollà
- International Neuroendocrine Cancer Alliance (INCA); Umbria Regional Cancer Network, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ken Herrmann
- European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM); University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Eva Karamitopoulou
- European Society of Pathology (ESP); Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cindy Neuzillet
- International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Franco Orsi
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE); European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Hanna Seppänen
- Association of European Cancer Leagues (ECL); Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martina Torchio
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI); IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Danila Valenti
- European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC); Palliative Care Network, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Zamboni
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI); University Hospital Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marc Zins
- European Society of Radiology (ESR); Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France
| | | | - Philip Poortmans
- European Cancer Organisation (ECCO); Iridium Kankernetwerk and University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Marchese U, Fuks D, Truant S, El Amrani M. Comment on: Failure to rescue in patients with distal pancreatectomy: a nationwide analysis of 10,632 patients. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2021; 10:229-231. [PMID: 33898563 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Marchese
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Paris University, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Paris University, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Stephanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Lille University, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Mehdi El Amrani
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Lille University, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Latenstein AEJ, Mackay TM, Beane JD, Busch OR, van Dieren S, Gleeson EM, Koerkamp BG, van Santvoort HC, Wellner UF, Williamsson C, Tingstedt B, Keck T, Pitt HA, Besselink MG. The use and clinical outcome of total pancreatectomy in the United States, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Surgery 2021; 170:563-570. [PMID: 33741182 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total pancreatectomy has high morbidity and mortality and differences among countries are currently unknown. This study compared the use and postoperative outcomes of total pancreatectomy among 4 Western countries. METHODS Patients who underwent one-stage total pancreatectomy were included from registries in the United States, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden (2014-2018). Use of total pancreatectomy was assessed by calculating the ratio total pancreatectomy to pancreatoduodenectomy. Primary outcomes were major morbidity (Clavien Dindo ≥3) and in-hospital mortality. Predictors for the primary outcomes were assessed in multivariable logistic regression analyses. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of volume (low-volume <40 or high-volume ≥40 pancreatoduodenectomies annually; data available for the Netherlands and Germany). RESULTS In total, 1,579 patients underwent one-stage total pancreatectomy. The relative use of total pancreatectomy to pancreatoduodenectomy varied up to fivefold (United States 0.03, Germany 0.15, the Netherlands 0.03, and Sweden 0.15; P < .001). Both the indication and several baseline characteristics differed significantly among countries. Major morbidity occurred in 423 patients (26.8%) and differed (22.3%, 34.9%, 38.3%, and 15.9%, respectively; P < .001). In-hospital mortality occurred in 85 patients (5.4%) and also differed (1.8%, 10.2%, 10.8%, 1.9%, respectively; P < .001). Country, age ≥75, and vascular resection were predictors for in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality was lower in high-volume centers in the Netherlands (4.9% vs 23.1%; P = .002), but not in Germany (9.8% vs 10.6%; P = .733). CONCLUSION Considerable differences in the use of total pancreatectomy, patient characteristics, and postoperative outcome were noted among 4 Western countries with better outcomes in the United States and Sweden. These large, yet unexplained, differences require further research to ultimately improve patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk E J Latenstein
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. https://twitter.com/anouklatenstein
| | - Tara M Mackay
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. https://twitter.com/tarammackay
| | - Joal D Beane
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, the Netherlands
| | - Ulrich F Wellner
- DGAV StuDoQ
- Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Caroline Williamsson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Tobias Keck
- DGAV StuDoQ
- Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Mortality after visceral surgery has decreased owing to progress in surgical techniques, anesthesiology and intensive care. Mortality occurs in 5-10% of patients after major surgery and remains a topic of interest. However, the ratio of mortality after postoperative complications in relation to overall complications varies between hospitals because of failure to rescue at the time of the complication. There are multiple factors that lead to complication-related mortality: they are patient-related, disease-related, but are related, above all, to the timeliness of diagnosis of the complication, the organisational aspects of management in private or public hospitals, hospital volume that corresponds to the centralisation of initial management or to the concept of referral centre in case of complications, to the team spirit, to communication between the health care providers and to the management of the complication itself. Several organisational advances are to be considered, such as the development of shorter hospitalisations and notably ambulatory surgery, as well as enhanced recovery programs. Remote monitoring and the contribution of artificial intelligence must also be evaluated in this context. The reduction of mortality after visceral surgery rests on several tactics: prevention of potentially lethal complications, the all-important reduction of failure to rescue, and risk management before, during and after hospitalisations that are increasingly shorter.
Collapse
|
43
|
Pastrana Del Valle J, Mahvi DA, Fairweather M, Wang J, Clancy TE, Ashley SW, Urman RD, Whang EE, Gold JS. The improvement in post-operative mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2006 and 2016 is associated with an improvement in the ability to rescue patients after major morbidity, not in the rate of major morbidity. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:434-443. [PMID: 32798109 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The postoperative mortality rate of pancreaticoduodenectomy is decreasing over time. It is unknown whether this is related to reduction in incidence of major morbidity or failure to rescue. We aimed to make this determination. METHODS ACS-NSQIP was retrospectively reviewed from 2006 to 2016. Comparisons were assessed with Spearman's rank-order correlation test, chi-square test with linear-by-linear association, and multivariable hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS Mortality decreased significantly from 2.9% to 1.5% (p < 0.001). This decrease was independent of preoperative variables on multivariable analysis (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-5.21, p < 0.001). In contrast, no change in incidence of major morbidity was seen on univariable (26.8% to 25.9%, p = 1.00) or multivariable analysis (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.45, p = 0.060). Failure to rescue was observed to decrease on univariable (9.8% to 4.1%, p < 0.001) and multivariable analysis (OR 3.65, 95% CI 2.07-6.76, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION There has been a sizeable reduction in the mortality rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2006 to 2016. This predominantly results from a reduction in failure to rescue rate rather than a decrease in incidence of major morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Pastrana Del Valle
- Surgical Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David A Mahvi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Fairweather
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jiping Wang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas E Clancy
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stanley W Ashley
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard D Urman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edward E Whang
- Surgical Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason S Gold
- Surgical Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
García Botella A, Gómez Bravo MA, Di Martino M, Gastaca M, Martín-Pérez E, Sánchez Cabús S, Sánchez Pérez B, López Ben S, Rodríguez Sanjuán JC, López-Andújar R, Barrera M, Balibrea JM, Rubio-Pérez I, Badia JM, Martin-Antona E, Peña EÁ, Garcia-Botella A, Martín-Pérez E, Gallego MÁ, Cortijo SM, Migueláñez IP, Díaz LP, Ramos Rodríquez JL, Espín-Basany E, Santos RS, Garriga XG, Aranda Narváez JM, Morales-Conde S. Recommendations on intervention for hepatobiliary oncological surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. CIRUGÍA ESPAÑOLA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2021. [PMCID: PMC7901494 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2020.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic requires an analysis in the field of oncological surgery, both on the risk of infection, with very relevant clinical consequences, and on the need to generate plans to minimize the impact on possible restrictions on health resources. The AEC is making a proposal for the management of patients with hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) malignancies in the different pandemic scenarios in order to offer the maximum benefit to patients, minimising the risks of COVID-19 infection, and optimising the healthcare resources available at any time. This requires the coordination of the different treatment options between the departments involved in the management of these patients: medical oncology, radiotherapy oncology, surgery, anaesthesia, radiology, endoscopy department and intensive care. The goal is offer effective treatments, adapted to the available resources, without compromising patients and healthcare professionals’ safety.
Collapse
|
45
|
García Botella A, Gómez Bravo MA, Di Martino M, Gastaca M, Martín-Pérez E, Sánchez Cabús S, Sánchez Pérez B, López Ben S, Rodríguez Sanjuán JC, López-Andújar R, Barrera M, Balibrea JM, Rubio-Pérez I, Badia JM, Martin-Antona E, Álvarez Peña E, Garcia-Botella A, Martín-Pérez E, Álvarez Gallego M, Martínez Cortijo S, Pascual Migueláñez I, Pérez Díaz L, Ramos Rodríquez JL, Espín-Basany E, Sánchez Santos R, Guirao Garriga X, Aranda Narváez JM, Morales-Conde S. Recommendations on intervention for hepatobiliary oncological surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cir Esp 2021; 99:174-182. [PMID: 33341242 PMCID: PMC7744030 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic requires an analysis in the field of oncological surgery, both on the risk of infection, with very relevant clinical consequences, and on the need to generate plans to minimize the impact on possible restrictions on health resources. The AEC is making a proposal for the management of patients with hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) malignancies in the different pandemic scenarios in order to offer the maximum benefit to patients, minimising the risks of COVID-19 infection, and optimising the healthcare resources available at any time. This requires the coordination of the different treatment options between the departments involved in the management of these patients: medical oncology, radiotherapy oncology, surgery, anaesthesia, radiology, endoscopy department and intensive care. The goal is offer effective treatments, adapted to the available resources, without compromising patients and healthcare professionals safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miguel Angel Gómez Bravo
- Cirugía general y del aparato digestivo, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | - Marcello Di Martino
- Cirugía general y del aparato digestivo, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, España
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Cirugía general y del aparato digestivo, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Bilbao, España
| | - Elena Martín-Pérez
- Cirugía general y del aparato digestivo, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, España
| | - Santiago Sánchez Cabús
- Cirugía general y del aparato digestivo, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España
| | | | - Santiago López Ben
- Cirugía general y del aparato digestivo, Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, España
| | | | - Rafael López-Andújar
- Cirugía general y del aparato digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | - Manuel Barrera
- Cirugía general y del aparato digestivo, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
The Impact of Patient Age ≥80 Years on Postoperative Outcomes and Treatment Costs Following Pancreatic Surgery. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10040696. [PMID: 33578965 PMCID: PMC7916670 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
As life expectancy is increasing, elderly patients are evaluated more frequently for resection of benign or malignant pancreatic lesions. However, the impact of age on postoperative morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs in octogenarian patients (≥80 years) undergoing major pancreatic surgery needs further investigation. The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery between January 2015 and March 2019 in a major hepatopancreatobiliary center in Switzerland were assessed. Postoperative outcomes and hospital costs of octogenarians and younger patients were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analysis. During the study period, 346 patients underwent pancreatic resection. Pancreatoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, total pancreatectomy, and other procedures were performed in 54%, 20%, 13%, and 13% of patients, respectively. The major postoperative morbidity rate and postoperative mortality rate were 25% and 3.5%, respectively. A total of 39 patients (11%) were ≥80 years old, and 307 patients were <80 years old. The majority of octogenarians suffered from ductal adenocarcinoma, whereas among younger patients, other indications for a pancreatic resection were predominant (ductal adenocarcinoma 64% vs. 41%, p = 0.006). Age ≥80 was associated with more frequent postoperative medical (pulmonary, cardiovascular) and surgical (high-grade pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage) complications. Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in octogenarians (15.4% vs. 2%, p < 0.0001). This finding may be explained by the higher rate of type C pancreatic fistula (13% vs. 5%), resulting more frequently in postoperative hemorrhage (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.002) among patients ≥80 years old. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, patient age ≥80 years predicted postoperative mortality independently of the tumor entity and surgical technique (p = 0.013, OR 6.71, 95% CI [1.5–30.3]). Increased major postoperative morbidity was responsible for lower cost recovery in octogenarians (94% vs. 102%, p = 0.046). In conclusion, patient age ≥80 years is associated with increased postoperative medical and surgical morbidity after major pancreatic surgery leading to lower cost recovery and a lower chance for successful resuscitation in patients requiring revisional surgery for postoperative hemorrhage and/or pancreatic fistula. In octogenarian patients suffering from pancreatic tumors, careful selection, and thorough prehabilitation is crucial to achieve the best postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
|
47
|
Mackay TM, Latenstein AEJ, Bonsing BA, Bruno MJ, van Eijck CHJ, Groot Koerkamp B, de Hingh IHJT, Homs MYV, van Hooft JE, van Laarhoven HW, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Stommel MWJ, de Vos-Geelen J, Wilmink JW, Busch OR, van der Geest LG, Besselink MG. Nationwide compliance with a multidisciplinary guideline on pancreatic cancer during 6-year follow-up. Pancreatology 2020; 20:1723-1731. [PMID: 33069583 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compliance with national guidelines on pancreatic cancer management could improve patient outcomes. Early compliance with the Dutch guideline was poor. The aim was to assess compliance with this guideline during six years after publication. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nationwide guideline compliance was investigated for three subsequent time periods (2012-2013 vs. 2014-2015 vs. 2016-2017) in patients with pancreatic cancer using five quality indicators in the Netherlands Cancer Registry: 1) discussion in multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT), 2) maximum 3-week interval from final MDT to start of treatment, 3) preoperative biliary drainage when bilirubin >250 μmol/L, 4) use of adjuvant chemotherapy, and 5) chemotherapy for inoperable disease (non-metastatic and metastatic). RESULTS In total, 14 491 patients were included of whom 2290 (15.8%) underwent resection and 4561 (31.5%) received chemotherapy. Most quality indicators did not change over time: overall, 88.8% of patients treated with curative intent were discussed in a MDT, 42.7% were treated with curative intent within the 3-week interval, 62.7% with a resectable head tumor and bilirubin >250 μmol/L underwent preoperative biliary drainage, 57.2% received chemotherapy after resection, and 36.6% with metastatic disease received chemotherapy. Only use of chemotherapy for non-metastatic, non-resected disease improved over time (23.4% vs. 25.6% vs. 29.7%). CONCLUSION Nationwide compliance to five quality indicators for the guideline on pancreatic cancer management showed little to no improvement during six years after publication. Besides critical review of the current quality indicators, these outcomes may suggest that a nationwide implementation program is required to increase compliance to guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara M Mackay
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk E J Latenstein
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Deparment of Surgery, Leids University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lydia G van der Geest
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Outcome Quality Beyond the Mean - An Analysis of 43,231 Pancreatic Surgical Procedures Related to Hospital Volume. Ann Surg 2020; 276:159-166. [PMID: 33234781 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine whether elevated in-hospital mortality rates in lower volume hospitals are only valid on average or also apply for individual hospitals. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Various studies demonstrated a volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery with increased mortality in low volume hospitals. However, almost all studies assessed quality indicators only for groups of hospitals by averaged measures, neglecting variability of hospital performance. METHODS The German nationwide hospital discharge data (diagnosis-related groups-statistics) was used to determine risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality for all distal pancreatectomies (DP), pancreatoduodenectomies (Whipple-procedure, PD), and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomies (PPD) performed between 2011 and 2015. Hospitals were stratified according to annual and 5-year total procedure volume and examined in relation to average in-hospital mortality of the highest volume quintile. RESULTS Lowest adjusted mortality rates were observed in highest volume quintiles for each pancreatic resection procedure, with 6.2% for DP, 8.3% for PD, and 5.7% for PPD in the 5-year observation period. With these mortality rates as reference values the analysis revealed that a non-negligible proportion of hospitals performed equal or better (DP: 430/784, 54.5%; PD: 269/611, 44.0%; PPD: 255/565, 45.1%) than the hospitals of the highest volume quintile. CONCLUSIONS High quality of care, with in-hospital mortality rates less or equal to high-volume hospitals, is also achieved in hospitals with lesser procedure volume. Therefore, mere volume seems not suitable as proximal measure for assessing individual hospital quality. Instead, more sophisticated certification systems, that allow accurate quality assessment and better reflect clinical variability, should preferred to fixed minimum volume thresholds.
Collapse
|
49
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical drain management after the diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: draining-tract-targeted works better than standard management. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:1219-1231. [PMID: 33104886 PMCID: PMC7686010 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-02005-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Drains’ role after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is debated by proponents of no drain, draining selected cases, and early drain removal. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of “standard” and “draining-tract-targeted” management of abdominal drains still in situ after diagnosing a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Methods PubMed and Scopus were searched for “pancreaticoduodenectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy or duodenopancreatectomy,” “Whipple,” “proximal pancreatectomy,” “pylorus-preserving pancreatectomy,” and “postoperative pancreatic fistula or POPF.”. Main outcomes included clinically relevant (CR) POPF, grade-C POPF, overall mortality, POPF-related mortality, and CR-POPF-related mortality. Secondary outcomes were incidence of radiological and/or endoscopic interventions, reoperations, and completion pancreatectomies. Results Overall, 12,089 studies were retrieved by the search of the English literature (01/01/1990–31/12/2018). Three hundred and twenty-six studies (90,321 patients) reporting ≥ 100 PDs and ≥ 10 PD/year were finally included into the study. Average incidences were obtained by averaging the incidence rates reported in the single articles. Pooled incidences were calculated by combining the number of events and the total number of patients considered in the various studies. These were then meta-analyzed using DerSimonian and Laird’s (1986) method. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to compare pooled incidences between groups. Post hoc testing was used to see which groups differed. The meta-analyzed incidences were compared using a fixed effect for moderators. “Draining-tract-targeted” management showed a significant advantage over “standard” management in four clinically relevant outcomes out of eight according to pool analysis and in one of them according to meta-analysis. Conclusion Clinically, “draining-targeted” management of POPF should be preferred to “standard” management. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00423-020-02005-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
50
|
van Dongen JC, Smits FJ, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Busch OR, Besselink MG, Aziz MH, Groot Koerkamp B, van Eijck CHJ. C-reactive protein is superior to white blood cell count for early detection of complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:1504-1512. [PMID: 32171648 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early detection of major complications after pancreatoduodenectomy could improve patient management and decrease the "failure-to-rescue" rate. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare the value of C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) in the early detection of complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS We assessed pancreatoduodenectomies between January 2012 and December 2017. Major complications were defined as grade III or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was a secondary endpoint. ROC-curve and logistic regression analysis were performed for CRP and WBC. Results were validated in an external cohort. RESULTS In the development cohort (n = 285), 103 (36.1%) patients experienced a major complication. CRP was superior to WBC in detecting major complications on postoperative day (POD) 3 (AUC:0.74 vs. 0.54, P < 0.001) and POD 5 (AUC:0.77 vs. 0.68, P = 0.031), however not on POD 7 (AUC:0.77 vs. 0.76, P = 0.773). These results were confirmed in multivariable analysis and in the validation cohort (n = 202). CRP was also superior to WBC in detecting POPF on POD 3 (AUC: 0.78 vs. 0.54, P < 0.001) and POD 5 (AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.71, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION CRP appears to be superior to WBC in the early detection of major complications and POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelle C van Dongen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - F Jasmijn Smits
- Department of Surgery, Utrecht MC, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Utrecht MC, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Utrecht MC, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Hossein Aziz
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|