1
|
Nocita MA, Brady CW, Kuller JA, Gatta LA. Perinatal Management of Hepatic Adenomas. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2024; 79:735-740. [PMID: 39792602 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
Importance With a strong association between hepatic adenomas and estrogen established, understanding the risks, evaluation, and perinatal management of hepatic adenomas is necessary for obstetric clinicians. Objective The aim of this study is to review the preconception counseling, perinatal management, and postpartum care of hepatic adenomas. Evidence Acquisition A literature review identified relevant research, review articles, textbook chapters, databases, and societal guidelines. Results Hepatic adenomas require individualized recommendations based on their prepregnancy size and evolution over pregnancy. Hepatic adenomas measuring greater than 5 cm are associated with a significantly increased risk during pregnancy including rupture. Ideally, optimal management of hepatic adenoma includes accurate diagnosis, discontinuation of estrogen-containing contraception, and surgical resection of large masses prior to conception. Patients should undergo serial surveillance of the adenoma during the antenatal and postpartum periods, with surgical intervention as indicated with multidisciplinary planning. Conclusions and Relevance An individualized approach is necessary when managing hepatic adenomas in the patient who is pregnant or intends pregnancy. More contemporary data are required to guide management and patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Nocita
- Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, R-1200 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Jeffrey A Kuller
- Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Luke A Gatta
- Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Frenette C, Mendiratta-Lala M, Salgia R, Wong RJ, Sauer BG, Pillai A. ACG Clinical Guideline: Focal Liver Lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:1235-1271. [PMID: 38958301 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Focal liver lesions (FLLs) have become an increasingly common finding on abdominal imaging, especially asymptomatic and incidental liver lesions. Gastroenterologists and hepatologists often see these patients in consultation and make recommendations for management of multiple types of liver lesions, including hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hemangioma, and hepatic cystic lesions including polycystic liver disease. Malignancy is important to consider in the differential diagnosis of FLLs, and healthcare providers must be familiar with the diagnosis and management of FLLs. This American College of Gastroenterology practice guideline uses the best evidence available to make diagnosis and management recommendations for the most common FLLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Reena Salgia
- Department of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Robert J Wong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Bryan G Sauer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guy J. Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) and pregnancy. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2024; 23:e0103. [PMID: 38312995 PMCID: PMC10833624 DOI: 10.1097/cld.0000000000000103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Guy
- Department of Transplantation, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hasuike S, Nagata K, Sasaki H, Hirata T, Suzuki S, Komaki Y, Ozono Y, Nakamura K, Miike T, Iwakiri H, Sueta M, Yamamoto S, Maekawa K, Kawakami H. Inflammatory Hepatocellular Adenoma Mimicking Focal Nodular Hyperplasia That Grew during Pregnancy and Changed Its Appearance on Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Delivery. Intern Med 2023; 62:3143-3149. [PMID: 37032077 PMCID: PMC10686732 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0967-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
We reported a notable case of inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma that grew during pregnancy, consequently changing its appearance on magnetic resonance imaging remarkably. A 5-months-pregnant 35-year-old woman presented with a 37-mm liver nodule that had been diagnosed as focal nodular hyperplasia 3 years earlier. She had never used oral contraceptives. After 2 months, the nodule grew to 57 mm. The patient delivered a full-term infant without complications. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging performed after delivery revealed markedly different findings compared with the first images. A liver biopsy was performed, and the tumor was diagnosed as inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoru Hasuike
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Kenji Nagata
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Haruka Sasaki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Tomoya Hirata
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Sho Suzuki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Yuri Komaki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ozono
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Kenichi Nakamura
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Tadashi Miike
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Hisayoshi Iwakiri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Mitsue Sueta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Shojiro Yamamoto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Kazuya Maekawa
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kawakami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stern S, Khalaileh A, Shveiky D, Lessans N. Laparoscopic Resection of a Giant Liver Tumor in Pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023; 30:683-684. [PMID: 37196885 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shira Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stern, Shveiky, and Lessans), Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Abed Khalaileh
- Department of Surgery (Dr. Khalaileh), Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David Shveiky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stern, Shveiky, and Lessans), Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Naama Lessans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Stern, Shveiky, and Lessans), Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Williamson C, Nana M, Poon L, Kupcinskas L, Painter R, Taliani G, Heneghan M, Marschall HU, Beuers U. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of liver diseases in pregnancy. J Hepatol 2023; 79:768-828. [PMID: 37394016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Liver diseases in pregnancy comprise both gestational liver disorders and acute and chronic hepatic disorders occurring coincidentally in pregnancy. Whether related to pregnancy or pre-existing, liver diseases in pregnancy are associated with a significant risk of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Thus, the European Association for the Study of Liver Disease invited a panel of experts to develop clinical practice guidelines aimed at providing recommendations, based on the best available evidence, for the management of liver disease in pregnancy for hepatologists, gastroenterologists, obstetric physicians, general physicians, obstetricians, specialists in training and other healthcare professionals who provide care for this patient population.
Collapse
|
7
|
Qureshy Z, Lokken RP, Kakar S, Grab J, Mehta N, Sarkar M. Influence of progestin-only hormonal use on hepatocellular adenomas: A retrospective cohort study. Contraception 2023; 119:109915. [PMID: 36476331 PMCID: PMC10266542 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Exogenous estrogen is associated with growth of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), although the influence of progestin-only agents is unknown. We therefore evaluated the association of progestin-only agents on HCA progression compared to no hormone exposure and compared to estrogen exposure in female patients. STUDY DESIGN In this single-center, retrospective cohort study of reproductive-aged female patients (ages 16-45) with diagnosed HCAs between 2003 and 2021, we evaluated radiographic HCA growth during discrete periods of well-defined exogenous hormone exposures. RESULTS A total of 34 patients were included. Nineteen (55.9%) had follow-up scans during periods without hormone exposure, 7 (20.6%) during estrogen exposure, and 8 (23.5%) during progestin-only exposure. Over a median follow-up of 11 months, percent change in sum of adenoma diameters from baseline to last available scan was -15.0% with progestin-only agents versus 29.4% with estrogen exposure (p = 0.04), and -7.4% with no hormonal exposure (p = 0.52 compared to progestin-only). Greater than 10% growth was observed in two individuals (25.0%) with progestin-only agent use (one patient on high-dose progestin for menorrhagia) versus five individuals (71.4%) with estrogen use (p = 0.13), and 7 (36.8%) with no exogenous hormone use (p = 0.68 vs progestin-only). CONCLUSIONS During discrete periods of progestin-only use, HCA growth overall declined, similar to declining growth during periods without exogenous hormonal exposure. This differed from discrete periods of exogenous estrogen exposure, during which time HCAs demonstrated overall increased growth. Though larger studies are needed, these findings support recent guidance supporting progestin-only agents for female patients with HCAs seeking non-estrogen alternatives for contraception. IMPLICATIONS In this small retrospective study, we observed overall decrease in HCA size during discrete periods of progestin-only contraception use, similar to that observed during periods without exogenous hormone exposure, supporting their use as a safe alternative to estrogen-containing contraceptives in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoya Qureshy
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - R Peter Lokken
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Sanjay Kakar
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Joshua Grab
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Liver Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Neil Mehta
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Liver Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Monika Sarkar
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Liver Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Haring MPD, de Haas RJ, van Vilsteren FGI, Klaase JM, Duiker EW, Blokzijl H, de Jong KP, de Meijer VE, Cuperus FJC. Variation in the management of benign liver tumors: A European survey and case vignette study. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2023; 47:102094. [PMID: 36781070 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), is multidisciplinary and subject to practice variation. We aimed to evaluate variation in clinical management of FNH and HCA in Europe. METHODS We distributed an online survey (November 2021-March 2022) among 294 European experts. The survey included questions on local practice and included eight clinical vignettes. The clinical vignettes focused on FNH or HCA management in the setting of sex, lifestyle modification, and pregnancy. RESULTS The response rate was 32% and respondents included surgeons (38%), gastroenterologists/hepatologists (25%), radiologists (32%), and pathologists (1.6%) from ten European countries. We observed practice variation with regard to lifestyle modification and imaging follow-up in patients with FNH, and with regard to the management of HCA >5 cm before and during pregnancy. Finally, the management of HCA >5 cm after lifestyle modification deviated from EASL guideline recommendations. CONCLUSION Our survey illustrates variability in FNH and HCA management in Europe. Several areas were identified for future research and guideline recommendations, including FNH follow-up and the management of HCA >5 cm. We propose the organization of Delphi consensus meetings to prioritize areas of research and update current guidelines to optimize management for all patients with benign liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn P D Haring
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Robbert J de Haas
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frederike G I van Vilsteren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien W Duiker
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Blokzijl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Koert P de Jong
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Frans J C Cuperus
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tse JR, Felker ER, Naini BV, Shen L, Shen J, Lu DSK, Kamaya A, Raman SS. Hepatocellular Adenomas: Molecular Basis and Multimodality Imaging Update. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220134. [PMID: 36821508 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are a family of liver tumors that are associated with variable prognoses. Since the initial description of these tumors, the classification of HCAs has expanded and now includes eight distinct genotypic subtypes based on molecular analysis findings. These genotypic subtypes have unique derangements in their cellular biologic makeup that determine their clinical course and may allow noninvasive identification of certain subtypes. Multiphasic MRI performed with hepatobiliary contrast agents remains the best method to noninvasively detect, characterize, and monitor HCAs. HCAs are generally hypointense during the hepatobiliary phase; the β-catenin-mutated exon 3 subtype and up to a third of inflammatory HCAs are the exception to this characterization. It is important to understand the appearances of HCAs beyond their depictions at MRI, as these tumors are typically identified with other imaging modalities first. The two most feared related complications are bleeding and malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma, although the risk of these complications depends on tumor size, subtype, and clinical factors. Elective surgical resection is recommended for HCAs that are persistently larger than 5 cm, adenomas of any size in men, and all β-catenin-mutated exon 3 HCAs. Thermal ablation and transarterial embolization are potential alternatives to surgical resection. In the acute setting of a ruptured HCA, patients typically undergo transarterial embolization with or without delayed surgical resection. This update on HCAs includes a review of radiologic-pathologic correlations by subtype and imaging modality, related complications, and management recommendations. © RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin R Tse
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-1307, Stanford, CA 94305 (J.R.T., L.S., J.S., A.K.); and Departments of Radiological Sciences (E.R.F., D.S.K.L., S.S.R.) and Pathology (B.V.N.), University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ely R Felker
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-1307, Stanford, CA 94305 (J.R.T., L.S., J.S., A.K.); and Departments of Radiological Sciences (E.R.F., D.S.K.L., S.S.R.) and Pathology (B.V.N.), University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Bita V Naini
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-1307, Stanford, CA 94305 (J.R.T., L.S., J.S., A.K.); and Departments of Radiological Sciences (E.R.F., D.S.K.L., S.S.R.) and Pathology (B.V.N.), University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Luyao Shen
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-1307, Stanford, CA 94305 (J.R.T., L.S., J.S., A.K.); and Departments of Radiological Sciences (E.R.F., D.S.K.L., S.S.R.) and Pathology (B.V.N.), University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jody Shen
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-1307, Stanford, CA 94305 (J.R.T., L.S., J.S., A.K.); and Departments of Radiological Sciences (E.R.F., D.S.K.L., S.S.R.) and Pathology (B.V.N.), University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David S K Lu
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-1307, Stanford, CA 94305 (J.R.T., L.S., J.S., A.K.); and Departments of Radiological Sciences (E.R.F., D.S.K.L., S.S.R.) and Pathology (B.V.N.), University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Aya Kamaya
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-1307, Stanford, CA 94305 (J.R.T., L.S., J.S., A.K.); and Departments of Radiological Sciences (E.R.F., D.S.K.L., S.S.R.) and Pathology (B.V.N.), University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Steven S Raman
- From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-1307, Stanford, CA 94305 (J.R.T., L.S., J.S., A.K.); and Departments of Radiological Sciences (E.R.F., D.S.K.L., S.S.R.) and Pathology (B.V.N.), University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pompili M, Ardito F, Brunetti E, Cabibbo G, Calliada F, Cillo U, de Sio I, Golfieri R, Grova M, Gruttadauria S, Guido M, Iavarone M, Manciulli T, Pagano D, Pettinari I, Santopaolo F, Soresi M, Colli A. Benign liver lesions 2022: Guideline for clinical practice of Associazione Italiana Studio del Fegato (AISF), Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica e Interventistica (SIRM), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB), Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Epatobilio-Pancreatica (AICEP), Società Italiana Trapianti d'Organo (SITO), Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citologia Diagnostica (SIAPEC-IAP) - Part II - Solid lesions. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:1614-1622. [PMID: 36089523 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Benign liver lesions are increasingly diagnosed in daily clinical practice due to the growing use of imaging techniques for the study of the abdomen in patients who have non-specific symptoms and do not have an increased risk of hepatic malignancy. They include simple or parasitic hepatic cysts and solid benign tumors which differ widely in terms of prevalence, clinical relevance, symptoms and natural history and often lead to significant clinical problems relating to diagnosis and clinical management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the management of benign focal liver lesions, the Scientific Societies mainly involved in their management have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the present Italian rules and methodologies necessary to produce clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic guidelines based on evidence. Here we present the second part of the guideline, concerning the diagnosis and clinical management of hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular adenoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Pompili
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, "Agostino Gemelli", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, Roma 00168, Italy.
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, "Agostino Gemelli", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Enrico Brunetti
- Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche, Chirurgiche, Diagnostiche e Pediatriche, Università di Pavia. Unità di Malattie Infettive e Immunologia, IRCCS Fondazione Ospedale San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cabibbo
- Sezione di Gastroenterologia e Epatologia, Dipartimento di Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, di Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza "G. D'Alessandro" (PROMISE) Università di Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Calliada
- Dipartimento di Radiologia, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo IRCCS, Università di Pavia, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianto di Fegato, Ospedale Universitario di Padova, Italy
| | - Ilario de Sio
- Epatogastroenterologia, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Napoli, Italy
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Dipartimento di Radiologia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Grova
- Sezione di Gastroenterologia e Epatologia, Dipartimento di Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, di Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza "G. D'Alessandro" (PROMISE) Università di Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Dipartimento per la cura e lo studio delle Patologie Addominali e dei Trapianti Addominali, Dipartimento di Chirurgia e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, IRCCS-ISMETT-UPMCI, Palermo, Università di Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Guido
- Dipartimento di Anatomia Patologica, Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina - DIMED, Università di Padova, Italy
| | - Massimo Iavarone
- Divisione di Gastroenterologia ed Epatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Tommaso Manciulli
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica - Università degli Studi, Firenze, Italy
| | - Duilio Pagano
- Dipartimento per la cura e lo studio delle Patologie Addominali e dei Trapianti Addominali, IRCCS-ISMETT-UPMC, Palermo, Italy
| | - Irene Pettinari
- Dipartimento di Radiologia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Santopaolo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, "Agostino Gemelli", Largo A. Gemelli, 8, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Maurizio Soresi
- Medicina Interna, Dipartimento di Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, di Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza "G. D'Alessandro" (PROMISE) Università di Palermo, Italy
| | - Agostino Colli
- Dipartimento di Medicina Trasfusionale ed Ematologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bioulac-Sage P, Gouw ASH, Balabaud C, Sempoux C. Hepatocellular Adenoma: What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and Why It Matters. Histopathology 2021; 80:878-897. [PMID: 34856012 DOI: 10.1111/his.14605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
In the last 2 decades there has been significant progress in research and diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), resulting in the establishment of a molecular and immunohistological HCA classification. This review aims to fine-tune the current expertise in order to enhance the histopathological diagnostic possibilities, by refining issues that are already known, addressing diagnostic difficulties and identifying still unknown aspects of HCA. We will discuss novel methods to identify HCA subtypes, in particular the sonic hedgehog HCAs and the interpretation of glutamine synthetase patterns for the recognition of beta-catenin mutated HCAs. The major complications of HCAs, bleeding and malignant transformation, will be considered, including the dilemmas of atypical and borderline lesions. Paragraphs on HCAs in different clinical and geographical settings, e.g. pregnancy, cirrhosis and non-western countries are included. The natural history of the different HCA subtypes in relation with age, sex and risk factors is a feature still insufficiently investigated. This is also true for the risks of clinical bleeding and malignant transformation in association with HCA subtypes. As HCA is a relatively rare tumor, a multicenter and multidisciplinary approach across geographical boundaries will be the appropriate method to establish prospective programs to identify, classify and manage HCAs, focusing on several aspects, e.g. etiology, underlying liver disease, complications, regression and growth. Updating what we know, identifying and addressing features that we do not know matters to warrant optimal patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annette S H Gouw
- Departement of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Christine Sempoux
- Service of Clinical Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Haring MPD, Cuperus FJC, Duiker EW, de Haas RJ, de Meijer VE. Scoping review of clinical practice guidelines on the management of benign liver tumours. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8:e000592. [PMID: 34362758 PMCID: PMC8351490 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Benign liver tumours (BLT) are increasingly diagnosed as incidentalomas. Clinical implications and management vary across and within the different types of BLT. High-quality clinical practice guidelines are needed, because of the many nuances in tumour types, diagnostic modalities, and conservative and invasive management strategies. Yet, available observational evidence is subject to interpretation which may lead to practice variation. Therefore, we aimed to systematically search for available clinical practice guidelines on BLT, to critically appraise them, and to compare management recommendations. DESIGN A scoping review was performed within MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science. All BLT guidelines published in peer-reviewed, and English language journals were eligible for inclusion. Clinical practice guidelines on BLT were analysed, compared, and critically appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) checklist regarding hepatic haemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations (PRISMA) for scoping reviews were adhered to. RESULTS The literature search yielded unique 367 papers, 348 were excluded after screening of title/abstract, and 16 after full-text screening. Three guidelines were included: the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG; 2014), Brazilian Society of Hepatology (SBH; 2015), and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL; 2016). There was no uniformity in the assessment methods for grading and gravity of recommendations between guidelines. Among observed differences were: (1) indications for biopsy in all three tumours; (2) advices on contraceptive pills and follow-up in FNH and HCA; (3) use of an individualised approach to HCA; (4) absence of recommendations for treatment of HCA in men; and (5) approaches to HCA subtype identification on magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSION Recognising differences in recommendations can assist in harmonisation of practice standards and identify unmet needs in research. This may ultimately contribute to improved global patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn P D Haring
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans J C Cuperus
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien W Duiker
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert J de Haas
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|