Risk factors for lethal arrhythmic events in children and adolescents with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and an implantable defibrillator: An international multicenter study

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

Effect of beta-blockers and exercise restriction on the prevention of sudden cardiac death in pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment tools and effective prevention strategies for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of beta-blockers and exercise restriction for SCD prevention in this population.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients aged <18 years who were diagnosed with HCM at our center between January 1996 and December 2021. SCD and aborted SCD were defined as SCD equivalents. We divided patients based on whether they were prescribed beta-blockers or exercise restriction and compared the outcomes among the groups. The primary outcome was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was the cumulative SCD equivalent rate. Outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard analysis. We also compared patients according to the occurrence of SCD equivalents to identify SCD risk predictors.

RESULTS

Among the 43 included patients [mean age, 7.7 (1.6-12.1) years; 23 male individuals], SCD equivalents occurred in 13 patients over 11.2 (4.5-15.6) years of follow-up, among whom 12 were resuscitated and 1 died. The OS rate was significantly higher in the beta-blocker and exercise restriction groups than in the non-beta-blocker and non-exercise restriction groups (81.3 % vs. 19.1 %, p < 0.01 and 57.4 % vs. 12.7 %, p < 0.01, respectively). Among the 13 patients with SCD equivalents, 5 had 9 recurrent SCD equivalents. A significant difference was observed between the SCD equivalent and non-SCD equivalent groups in the history of suspected arrhythmogenic syncope (p < 0.01) in the univariable but not in the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blockers and exercise restriction may decrease the risk of SCD in pediatric patients with HCM and should be considered for SCD prevention in this population, particularly because predicting SCD in these patients remains challenging.

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

Unique Aspects of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Children

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a primary heart muscle disease characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy that can be asymptomatic or with presentations that vary from left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, heart failure from diastolic dysfunction, arrhythmias, and/or sudden cardiac death. Children younger than 1 year of age tend to have worse outcomes and often have HCM secondary to inborn errors of metabolism or syndromes such as RASopathies. For children who survive or are diagnosed after 1 year of age, HCM outcomes are often favourable and similar to those seen in adults. This is because of sudden cardiac death risk stratification and medical and surgical innovations. Genetic testing and timely cardiac screening are paving the way for disease-modifying treatment as gene-specific therapies are being developed.

The Paradigm of Sudden Death Prevention in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a relatively common and, often, inherited cardiac disease, once regarded as largely untreatable with ominous prognosis and, perhaps, most visibly as a common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young. However, HCM is now more accurately considered a treatable disease with management options that significantly alter its clinical course. This is particularly true for SCD because the penetration of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators into HCM practice enables primary prevention device therapy that reliably terminates potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias (3% to 4%/year). This therapeutic advance is largely responsible for >10-fold decrease in the overall disease-related mortality to 0.5%/year, independent of patient age. A guideline-based clinical risk stratification algorithm has evolved, which included variables identifiable with cardiac magnetic resonance: ≥1 risk markers judged major within the clinical profile of an individual patient, associated with a measure of physician judgment and shared decision-making, can be sufficient to consider the recommendation of a prophylactic defibrillator implant. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator decisions using the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association traditional major risk marker strategy are associated with a 95% sensitivity for identifying those patients who subsequently experience appropriate therapy, albeit often 5 to 10+ years after implant but without heart failure deterioration or death after a device intervention. A mathematical SCD risk score proposed by European Society of Cardiology is associated with a relatively low sensitivity (33%) for predicting and preventing SCD events but with potential for less device overtreatment.

Contemporary review on pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: insights into detection and management

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the most common genetic cardiac disorder and is defined by the presence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in the absence of a condition capable of producing such a magnitude of hypertrophy. Over the past decade, guidelines on the screening, diagnostic, and management protocols of pediatric primary (i.e., sarcomeric) HCM have undergone significant revisions. Important revisions include changes to the appropriate screening age, the role of cardiac MRI (CMR) in HCM diagnosis, and the introduction of individualized pediatric SCD risk assessment models like HCM Risk-kids and PRIMaCY. This review explores open uncertainties in pediatric HCM that merit further attention, such as the divergent American and European recommendations on CMR use in HCM screening and diagnosis, the need for incorporating key genetic and imaging parameters into HCM-Risk Kids and PRIMaCY, the best method of quantifying myocardial fibrosis and its prognostic utility in SCD prediction for pediatric HCM, devising appropriate genotype- and phenotype-based exercise recommendations, and use of heart failure medications that can reverse cardiac remodeling in pediatric HCM.

Patterns of Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Children with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a common cardiomyopathy in children, is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Early recognition and appropriate management are important. An electrocardiogram (ECG) is often used as a screening tool in children to detect heart disease. The ECG patterns in children with HCM are not well described.ECGs collected from an international cohort of children, and adolescents (≤ 21 years) with HCM were reviewed. 482 ECGs met inclusion criteria. Age ranged from 1 day to 21 years, median 13 years. Of the 482 ECGs, 57 (12%) were normal. The most common abnormalities noted were left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in 108/482 (22%) and biventricular hypertrophy (BVH) in 116/482 (24%) Of the patients with LVH/BVH (n = 224), 135 (60%) also had a strain pattern (LVH in 83, BVH in 52). Isolated strain pattern (in the absence of criteria for hypertrophy) was seen in 43/482 (9%). Isolated pathologic Q waves were seen in 71/482 (15%). Pediatric HCM, 88% have an abnormal ECG. The most common ECG abnormalities were LVH or BVH with or without strain. Strain pattern without hypertrophy and a pathologic Q wave were present in a significant proportion (24%) of patients. Thus, a significant number of children with HCM have ECG abnormalities that are not typical for "hypertrophy". The presence of the ECG abnormalities described above in a child should prompt further examination with an echocardiogram to rule out HCM.

Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients Diagnosed With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy During Childhood: Insights From the SHaRe Registry

BACKGROUND

The development of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is rare but serious and associated with poor outcomes in adults. Little is known about the prevalence, predictors, and prognosis of LVSD in patients diagnosed with HCM as children.

METHODS

Data from patients with HCM in the international, multicenter SHaRe (Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry) were analyzed. LVSD was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction <50% on echocardiographic reports. Prognosis was assessed by a composite of death, cardiac transplantation, and left ventricular assist device implantation. Predictors of developing incident LVSD and subsequent prognosis with LVSD were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We studied 1010 patients diagnosed with HCM during childhood (<18 years of age) and compared them with 6741 patients with HCM diagnosed as adults. In the pediatric HCM cohort, median age at HCM diagnosis was 12.7 years (interquartile range, 8.0-15.3), and 393 (36%) patients were female. At initial SHaRe site evaluation, 56 (5.5%) patients with childhood-diagnosed HCM had prevalent LVSD, and 92 (9.1%) developed incident LVSD during a median follow-up of 5.5 years. Overall LVSD prevalence was 14.7% compared with 8.7% in patients with adult-diagnosed HCM. Median age at incident LVSD was 32.6 years (interquartile range, 21.3-41.6) for the pediatric cohort and 57.2 years (interquartile range, 47.3-66.5) for the adult cohort. Predictors of developing incident LVSD in childhood-diagnosed HCM included age <12 years at HCM diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.72 [CI, 1.13-2.62), male sex (HR, 3.1 [CI, 1.88-5.2), carrying a pathogenic sarcomere variant (HR, 2.19 [CI, 1.08-4.4]), previous septal reduction therapy (HR, 2.34 [CI, 1.42-3.9]), and lower initial left ventricular ejection fraction (HR, 1.53 [CI, 1.38-1.69] per 5% decrease). Forty percent of patients with LVSD and HCM diagnosed during childhood met the composite outcome, with higher rates in female participants (HR, 2.60 [CI, 1.41-4.78]) and patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% (HR, 3.76 [2.16-6.52]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with childhood-diagnosed HCM have a significantly higher lifetime risk of developing LVSD, and LVSD emerges earlier than for patients with adult-diagnosed HCM. Regardless of age at diagnosis with HCM or LVSD, the prognosis with LVSD is poor, warranting careful surveillance for LVSD, especially as children with HCM transition to adult care.

Analysis of risk stratification and prevention of sudden death in pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Dilemmas and clarity

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been considered the most common cause of sudden death (SD) in the young. However, introduction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in HCM has proved highly effective and the mainstay of preventing SD in children, adolescents, and adults by terminating malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Nevertheless, ICD decision making is generally regarded as more difficult in pediatrics, and the strategy for selecting ICD patients from this population remains without consensus. Prospective studies in HCM children and adolescents have shown the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology traditional major risk marker strategy to be reliable with >90% sensitivity in selecting patients for SD prevention. International data in >2000 young HCM patients assembled over 20 years who were stratified by major risk markers showed ICDs effectively prevented SD in 20%. Alternatively, novel quantitative risk scoring initiatives provide 5-year risk estimates that are potentially useful as adjunctive tools to facilitate discussion of prophylactic ICD risks vs benefit but are as yet unsupported by prospective outcome studies. Risk scoring strategies are characterized by reasonable discriminatory statistical power (C-statistic 0.69-0.76) for identifying patients with SD events but with relatively low sensitivity, albeit with specificity comparable with the risk marker strategy. While some reticence for obligating healthy-appearing young patients to lifelong device implants is understandable, underutilization of the ICD in high-risk children and adolescents can represent a lost opportunity for fulfilling the long-standing aspiration of SD prevention. This review provides a critical assessment of the current strengths and weaknesses of SD risk stratification strategies in young HCM patients in an effort to clarify clinical decision making in this challenging subpopulation.

Indications and management of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Sudden cardiac death is the most common mode of death during childhood and adolescence in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and identifying those individuals at highest risk is a major aspect of clinical care. The mainstay of preventative therapy is the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, which has been shown to be effective at terminating malignant ventricular arrhythmias in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy but can be associated with substantial morbidity. Accurate identification of those children at highest risk who would benefit most from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation while minimising the risk of complications is, therefore, essential. This position statement, on behalf of the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), reviews the currently available data on established and proposed risk factors for sudden cardiac death in childhood-onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and current approaches for risk stratification in this population. It also provides guidance on identification of individuals at risk of sudden cardiac death and optimal management of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children and adolescents with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

The Prevalence and Association of Exercise Test Abnormalities With Sudden Cardiac Death and Transplant-Free Survival in Childhood Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) can be associated with an abnormal exercise response. In adults with HCM, abnormal results on exercise stress testing are predictive of heart failure outcomes. Our goal was to determine whether an abnormal exercise response is associated with adverse outcomes in pediatric patients with HCM.

METHODS

In an international cohort study including 20 centers, phenotype-positive patients with primary HCM who were <18 years of age at diagnosis were included. Abnormal exercise response was defined as a blunted blood pressure response and new or worsened ST- or T-wave segment changes or complex ventricular ectopy. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) events were defined as a composite of SCD and aborted sudden cardiac arrest. Using Kaplan-Meier survival, competing outcomes, and Cox regression analyses, we analyzed the association of abnormal exercise test results with transplant and SCD event-free survival.

RESULTS

Of 724 eligible patients, 630 underwent at least 1 exercise test. There were no major differences in clinical characteristics between those with or without an exercise test. The median age at exercise testing was 13.8 years (interquartile range, 4.7 years); 78% were male and 39% were receiving beta-blockers. A total of 175 (28%) had abnormal test results. Patients with abnormal test results had more severe septal hypertrophy, higher left atrial diameter z scores, higher resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient, and higher frequency of myectomy compared with participants with normal test results (P<0.05). Compared with normal test results, abnormal test results were independently associated with lower 5-year transplant-free survival (97% versus 88%, respectively; P=0.005). Patients with exercise-induced ischemia were most likely to experience all-cause death or transplant (hazard ratio, 4.86 [95% CI, 1.69-13.99]), followed by those with an abnormal blood pressure response (hazard ratio, 3.19 [95% CI, 1.32-7.71]). Exercise-induced ischemia was also independently associated with lower SCD event-free survival (hazard ratio, 3.32 [95% CI, 1.27-8.70]). Exercise-induced ectopy was not associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise abnormalities are common in childhood HCM. An abnormal exercise test result was independently associated with lower transplant-free survival, especially in those with an ischemic or abnormal blood pressure response with exercise. Exercise-induced ischemia was also independently associated with SCD events. These findings argue for routine exercise testing in childhood HCM as part of ongoing risk assessment.

Can exercise test intensity and modality affect the prevalence of arrhythmic events in young athletes?

Pre-participation screening is performed to identify underlying cardiac conditions that may also lead to sudden cardiac death. Our aim is to compare submaximal Harvard Step Test (HST) with incremental Maximal Exercise Test (MET) on treadmill to induce and detect arrhythmias in younger athletes. A total of 1000 athletes (mean age 14.6 ± 4.7 years) were evaluated, 500 with MET and 500 with HST, all with continuous ECG monitoring until three minutes of recovery. Pre-test evaluation includes medical history, clinical evaluation and resting electrocardiogram. Ventricular and/or supraventricular arrhythmias were observed in 2.6% of athletes performing HST and in 8.4% during MET (p < 0.001). Incidence of arrhythmias remained higher for MET also considering separately exercise phase (0.8% vs. 5.2%; p < 0.001) and recovery phase (2.0% vs. 6.0%; p < 0.01). No gender differences were observed. Results suggest that MET induces more arrhythmias than submaximal HST, regardless of test phase. Higher test intensity and longer exercise duration might influence test outcomes, making MET more arrhythmogenic.

Thirty-year outcome in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on the type

BACKGROUND

We reviewed the long-term outcome of children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) based on the type.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 100 patients (male 54 female 46) with HCM at our hospital between 1977 and 2015. The survival and cardiac event-free survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The age at the time of the diagnosis ranged from 0 to 15 years with a median of 8 years. The number of patients with Noonan syndrome and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), idiopathic HCM (i-HCM), and secondary HCM (s-HCM) was 13, 13, 65, and 9 respectively. A dilated phase of HCM occurred in 24 patients. Nineteen (79 %) of the 24 patients died of heart failure, and two underwent a heart transplantation. Eight (33 %) of the 24 patients had s-HCM. The median age when a dilated phase occurred was 15 years old, and the median interval from the initial diagnosis to the dilated phase was 8 years. The median time from the diagnosis of a dilated phase to death was 1.6 years. Sudden death and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantations occurred in 6 and 11 patients at around 15 years old, respectively. The 20-year survival rates were as follows: Noonan syndrome 84 %; HOCM 82 %; i-HCM 71 %; and s-HCM 17 %. Overall, the survival rates at 10, 20, and 30 years were 83 % (95 % confidence interval 73-89), 69 % (58-78), and 63 % (50-74), respectively. The overall cardiac event-free survival rates at 10, 20, and 30 years were 57 % (47-67), 39 % (31-50), and 32 % (21-44), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The long-term outcome in children with HCM was poor, and the outcome of s-HCM was very poor. The occurrence of a dilated phase worsened the outcome in HCM patients. Sudden death and d-HCM often occurred at around 15 years old.

Implantable defibrillators in primary prevention of genetic arrhythmias. A shocking choice?

Many previously unexplained life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) in young individuals are now recognized to be genetic in nature and are ascribed to a growing number of distinct inherited arrhythmogenic diseases. These include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), and short QT syndrome. Because of their lower frequency compared to coronary disease, risk factors for SCD are not very precise in patients with inherited arrhythmogenic diseases. As randomized studies are generally non-feasible and may even be ethically unjustifiable, especially in the presence of effective therapies, the risk assessment of malignant arrhythmic events such as SCD, cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF), appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions, or ICD therapy on fast VT/VF to guide ICD implantation is based on observational data and expert consensus. In this document, we review risk factors for SCD and indications for ICD implantation and additional therapies. What emerges is that, allowing for some important differences between cardiomyopathies and channelopathies, there is a growing and disquieting trend to create, and then use, semi-automated systems (risk scores, risk calculators, and, to some extent, even guidelines) which then dictate therapeutic choices. Their common denominator is a tendency to favour ICD implantation, sometime with reason, sometime without it. This contrasts with the time-honoured approach of selecting, among the available therapies, the best option (ICDs included) based on the clinical judgement for the specific patient and after having assessed the protection provided by optimal medical treatment.

Relationship Between Maximal Left Ventricular Wall Thickness and Sudden Cardiac Death in Childhood Onset Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Maximal left ventricular wall thickness (MLVWT) is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In adults, the severity of left ventricular hypertrophy has a nonlinear relationship with SCD, but it is not known whether the same complex relationship is seen in childhood. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between left ventricular hypertrophy and SCD risk in a large international pediatric HCM cohort.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 1075 children (mean age, 10.2 years [±4.4]) diagnosed with HCM (1-16 years) from the International Paediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Consortium. Anonymized, noninvasive clinical data were collected from baseline evaluation and follow-up, and 5-year estimated SCD risk was calculated (HCM Risk-Kids).

RESULTS

MLVWT Z score was <10 in 598 (58.1%), ≥10 to <20 in 334 (31.1%), and ≥20 in 143 (13.3%). Higher MLVWT Z scores were associated with heart failure symptoms, unexplained syncope, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, left atrial dilatation, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. One hundred twenty-two patients (71.3%) with MLVWT Z score ≥20 had coexisting risk factors for SCD. Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years (interquartile range, 2.3-9.3), 115 (10.7%) had an SCD event. Freedom from SCD event at 5 years for those with MLVWT Z scores <10, ≥10 to <20, and ≥20 was 95.6%, 87.4%, and 86.0, respectively. The estimated SCD risk at 5 years had a nonlinear, inverted U-shaped relationship with MLVWT Z score, peaking at Z score +23. The presence of coexisting risk factors had a summative effect on risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with HCM, an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between left ventricular hypertrophy and estimated SCD risk. The presence of additional risk factors has a summative effect on risk. While MLVWT is important for risk stratification, it should not be used either as a binary variable or in isolation to guide implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation decisions in children with HCM.

What Aspects of Phenotype Determine Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death in Pediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy?

Sudden cardiac death due to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), is the most common autopsy-proven cause of unexpected medical death in children after infancy. This mode of death is preventable by implantation of an internal cardiac defibrillator (ICD), a procedure that has considerable morbidity in childhood patients, and even mortality. Since HCM is an inheritable disease (usually autosomal dominant, occasionally recessive), family screening may identify subjects at risk. This review summarizes published studies carried out to identify which phenotypic markers are important risk factors in childhood patients with HCM and reviews the performance of existing risk-stratification algorithms (HCM Risk-Kids, PRIMaCY) against those of single phenotypic markers. A significant proportion of HCM-patients diagnosed in childhood are associated with RASopathies such as Noonan syndrome, but a knowledge gap exists over risk stratification in this patient group. In conclusion, pediatric risk-stratification algorithms for sudden cardiac death perform better in children than adult HCM risk-stratification strategies. However, current multivariable algorithms overestimate risk substantially without having high sensitivity, and remain ‘a work in progress’. To include additional phenotypic parameters that can be reproducibly measured such as ECG-markers, e.g., ECG risk score (which has high sensitivity and negative predictive value), tissue Doppler diastolic function measurements, and quantification of myocardial scarring on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, has the potential to improve risk-stratification algorithms. Until that work has been achieved, these are three factors that the clinician can combine with the current algorithm-calculated per cent risk, in order better to assess risk.

A Comprehensive Assessment of Cardiomyopathies through Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Focus on the Pediatric Population

Cardiomyopathies (CMPs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases that involve the myocardium and result in systolic or diastolic impairment of the cardiac muscle, potentially leading to heart failure, malignant arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death. Occurrence in pediatric age is rare but has been associated with worse outcomes. Non-invasive cardiac imaging techniques, integrated with clinical, genetic, and electrocardiographic data, have shown a pivotal role in the clinical work-up of such diseases by defining structural alterations and assessing potential complications. Above all modalities, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a powerful tool complementary to echocardiography to confirm diagnosis, provide prognostic information and guide therapeutic strategies secondary to its high spatial and temporal resolution, lack of ionizing radiation, and good reproducibility. Moreover, CMR can provide in vivo tissue characterization of the myocardial tissue aiding the identification of structural pathologic changes such as replacement or diffuse fibrosis, which are predictors of worse outcomes. Large prospective randomized studies are needed for further validation of CMR in the context of childhood CMPs. This review aims to highlight the role of advanced imaging with CMR in CMPs with particular reference to the dilated, hypertrophic and non-compacted phenotypes, which are more commonly seen in children.

Exercise Recommendations in Pediatric HCM: Variation and Influence of Provider Characteristics

Pediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD) that can be related to physical activity. Without pediatric specific guidelines, recommendations for activity restriction may be varied. Therefore, our aim is to determine the current practice and variability surrounding exercise clearance recommendations (ER) in pediatric HCM referral centers as well as provider and patient characteristics that influence them. We designed a survey that was distributed to the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study (PHTS) providers and members of the Pediatric and Adult Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) querying provider demographics and patient variables from 2 patient vignettes. The study is a multicenter survey of current practice of specialized providers caring for pediatric HCM patients. Survey of PHTS and PACES providers via email to the respective listservs with a response rate of 28% and 91 overall completing the entire survey after self-identifying as providers for pediatric HCM patients at their center. ER varies for pediatric HCM and is associated with provider training background as well as personal and professional history. Of the 91 providers who completed the survey, 42% (N = 38) trained in pediatric electrophysiology (EP), and 40% (N = 36) in pediatric heart failure (HF). Responses varied and only 53% of providers cleared for mild to moderate activity for the patient in Vignette 1, which is more in line with recent published adult guidelines. ER in both vignettes was significantly associated with type of training background. EP providers were more likely to recommend no restriction (27.8% vs 5.9%) than HF providers even when controlling for provider age and time out of training. Syncope with exercise was deemed "Most Important" by 81% of providers when making ER. ER for pediatric HCM are variable and the majority of providers make ER outside of previously published adult guidelines. Furthermore, ER are influenced by provider background and experience. Further study is needed for risks and benefits of physical activity in this population to inform the development of pediatric specific guidelines.

Relationship between life threatening events and electromechanical window in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a novel parameter for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death Electromechanical window in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young individuals, largely due to ventricular arrhythmias, which may be associated with electrical disturbances from pathologic myocardial changes.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated electromechanical mismatches in patients with HCM and the relationship between electromechanical mismatches and life-threatening events (LTEs).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with HCM, aged 1-80 years old. Electromechanical mismatch was evaluated using the electromechanical window (EMW), defined as the interval between the Q wave and aortic valve closure minus the QT interval.

RESULTS

We enrolled 458 patients with a mean age of 52.4±18.8 years. When the EMW of patients with HCM was compared to that of age/sex-matched normal controls, the EMW was more negative in patients with HCM than in normal controls (-51±35 vs. 7±19 ms, p<0.001). LTEs occurred in 25 patients (5.5%). The EMW was more negative in patients with LTEs than in those without (-77±33 vs. -42±31 ms, p<0.001). The cut-off value of EMW to identify patients with LTEs was -54 ms and the c-index of EMW was 0.726. EMW<-54 ms, unexplained syncope, pediatric-onset, and extreme left ventricular hypertrophy were significant risk factors for LTEs on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

EMW was more negative in patients with HCM than in healthy individuals, and profound EMW negativity was an independent risk factor for LTEs. EMW can be useful for the risk stratification of SCD in patients with HCM.

The Risk of Sudden Death in Children with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most common cause of death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and occurs more frequently than in adult patients. Risk stratification strategies have traditionally been extrapolated from adult practice, but newer evidence has highlighted important differences between childhood and adult cohorts, with the implication that pediatric-specific risk stratification strategies are required. Current guidelines use cumulative risk factor thresholds to recommend implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation but have been shown to have limited discriminatory ability. Newer pediatric models that allow clinicians to calculate individualized estimates of 5-year risk allowing, for the first time, personalization of ICD implantation decision-making have been developed. This article describes the pathophysiology, risk factors, and approach to risk stratification for SCD in childhood HCM and highlights unanswered questions.

Sudden cardiac death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is best predicted by a combination of electrocardiogram risk-score and HCMRisk-Kids score

AIM

To compare risk algorithms (HCMRisk-Kids, ECG Risk-score) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) without syndrome association (ns-HCM) and with Noonan-like syndromes (RAS-HCM).

METHODS

A national paediatric HCM cohort (n = 151), presenting <19 years of age, mean follow-up 13.3 years, from all Swedish centres of Paediatric Cardiology (presenting 1972-2015), with 41 RAS-HCM patients (61% males), and 110 ns-HCM patients (68% familial; 65% males). The end-point was a composite of sudden cardiac death and resuscitated cardiac arrest (SCD/CA). Risk-factors were studied with Cox-hazard regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (C-statistic).

RESULTS

There were 33 SCD/CA, 27/110 in ns-HCM and 6/41 in RAS-HCM (p = 0.27). In ns-HCM HCMRisk-Kids ≥6% at diagnosis had C-statistic of 0.69 for predicting SCD/CA during first 5 years of follow-up and positive predictive value (PPV) of 22%. After 7 years of age (HCMRisk-Kids7plus), C-statistic was 0.76. ECG Risk-score ≥6 at diagnosis had C-statistic 0.87 and PPV of 31%. Independent risk factors for SCD/CA were HCMRisk-Kids7plus score (p = 0.005) and ECG risk-score (p < 0.001), whereas early beta-blocker dose (p = 0.001) and myectomy (p = 0.004) reduced risk. The sum of HCMRisk-Kids7yplus and ECG Risk-score7yplus ≥14 best predicted SCD/CA within 5 years in ns-HCM with C-statistic of 0.90 [0.83-0.96], sensitivity 100% and PPV 38%.

CONCLUSION

Combining the ECG Risk-score with HCMRisk-Kids improves risk stratification in ns-HCM and shows promise in RAS-HCM.

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients: Developed in collaboration with and endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

Clinical outcomes and programming strategies of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices in paediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a UK National Cohort Study

AIMS

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most common mode of death in paediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This study describes the implant and programming strategies with clinical outcomes following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion in a well-characterized national paediatric HCM cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 90 patients undergoing ICD insertion at a median age 13 (±3.5) for primary (n = 67, 74%) or secondary prevention (n = 23, 26%) were collected from a retrospective, longitudinal multi-centre cohort of children (<16 years) with HCM from the UK. Seventy-six (84%) had an endovascular system [14 (18%) dual coil], 3 (3%) epicardial, and 11 (12%) subcutaneous system. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed at implant in 68 (76%). Inadequate DFT in four led to implant adjustment in three patients. Over a median follow-up of 54 months (interquartile range 28-111), 25 (28%) patients had 53 appropriate therapies [ICD shock n = 45, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) n = 8], incidence rate 4.7 per 100 patient years (95% CI 2.9-7.6). Eight inappropriate therapies occurred in 7 (8%) patients (ICD shock n = 4, ATP n = 4), incidence rate 1.1/100 patient years (95% CI 0.4-2.5). Three patients (3%) died following arrhythmic events, despite a functioning device. Other device complications were seen in 28 patients (31%), including lead-related complications (n = 15) and infection (n = 10). No clinical, device, or programming characteristics predicted time to inappropriate therapy or lead complication.

CONCLUSION

In a large national cohort of paediatric HCM patients with an ICD, device and programming strategies varied widely. No particular strategy was associated with inappropriate therapies, missed/delayed therapies, or lead complications.

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consenus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology, (ACC) and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate follow-up in pediatric patients.

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients: Executive Summary

Guidelines for the implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have evolved since publication of the initial ACC/AHA pacemaker guidelines in 1984 [1]. CIEDs have evolved to include novel forms of cardiac pacing, the development of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and the introduction of devices for long term monitoring of heart rhythm and other physiologic parameters. In view of the increasing complexity of both devices and patients, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. In 2018, the ACC/AHA/HRS published Guidelines on the Evaluation and Management of Patients with Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay [2], which were specific recommendations for patients >18 years of age. This age-specific threshold was established in view of the differing indications for CIEDs in young patients as well as size-specific technology factors. Therefore, the following document was developed to update and further delineate indications for the use and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, with recognition that there is often overlap in the care of patents between 18 and 21 years of age.

This document is an abbreviated expert consensus statement (ECS) intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease/diagnostic categories. This document will also provide guidance regarding the management of lead systems and follow-up evaluation for pediatric patients with CIEDs. The recommendations are presented in an abbreviated modular format, with each section including the complete table of recommendations along with a brief synopsis of supportive text and select references to provide some context for the recommendations. This document is not intended to provide an exhaustive discussion of the basis for each of the recommendations, which are further addressed in the comprehensive PACES-CIED document [3], with further data easily accessible in electronic searches or textbooks.

Newer risk assessment strategies in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present article serves to review current risk assessment guidelines for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and to discuss how these guidelines can be applied to patients with childhood HCM. New diagnostic techniques that could lead to more accurate risk assessment tools are also discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current guidelines for risk assessment in childhood HCM are extrapolated from adult guidelines and lack background research to validate their use. Continuous variables, such as wall thickness, are converted to binary variables, which is particularly concerning in pediatric patients' where weight gain and linear growth is likely to lead to more significant hemodynamic changes in shorter periods of time. Some studies have even shown that risk factors concerning in adults may actually be protective in pediatric patients. Additionally, large gaps still remain between genotype and phenotype expression in HCM.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of the relationship between cause, phenotype, and outcomes is needed to truly be able to determine risk for SCD in childhood HCM. Larger studies, including newer technologies and quantitative models, similar to the European HCM Risk-SCD model, which allows for a quantitative risk diagnosis, are needed as well.

Evolution of risk stratification and sudden death prevention in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Twenty years with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a relatively common inherited myocardial disorder, once regarded as largely untreatable with ominous prognosis and most visibly as a common cause of sudden death (SD) in the young. Over the last several years, HCM has been transformed into a contemporary treatable disease with management options that significantly alter clinical course. With the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in the HCM patient population, a new paradigm has emerged, with primary prevention device therapy reliably terminating potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias (3%-4% per year) and being largely responsible for a >10-fold decrease in disease-related mortality (to 0.5% per year), independent of age. An evidenced-based and guideline directed clinical risk stratification algorithm has evolved, including variables identified with cardiac magnetic resonance. One or more risk markers judged major and relevant within a patient's clinical profile can be considered sufficient to recommend a primary prevention implant (associated with a measure of physician judgment and shared decision-making). ICD decisions using the prospective individual risk marker strategy have been associated with 95% sensitivity for identifying patients who subsequently experienced appropriate ICD therapy, (albeit often delayed substantially for >5 or >10 years after implant), but without heart failure deterioration or HCM death following device intervention. A rigid mathematically derived statistical risk model proposed by the European Society of Cardiology is associated with low sensitivity (ie, 33%) for predicting SD events. Introduction of prophylactically inserted ICDs to HCM 20 years ago has significantly altered the clinical course and landscape of this disease. SD prevention has reduced HCM mortality significantly, making preservation of life and the potential for normal longevity a reality for most patients.

Overview of Cardiomyopathies in Childhood

Paediatric cardiomyopathies are a heterogenous group of rare disorders, characterised by mechanical and electrical abnormalities of the heart muscle. The overall annual incidence of childhood cardiomyopathies is estimated at about 1 per 100,000 children and is significantly higher during the first 2 years of life. Dilated cardiomyopathies account for approximately half of the cases. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathies form the second largest group, followed by the less common left ventricular non-compaction and restrictive phenotypes. Infectious, metabolic, genetic, and syndromic conditions account for the majority of cases. Congestive heart failure is the typical manifestation in children with dilated cardiomyopathy, whereas presenting symptoms are more variable in other phenotypes. The natural history is largely influenced by the type of cardiomyopathy and its underlying aetiology. Results from a national population-based study revealed 10-year transplant-free survival rates of 80, 62, and 48% for hypertrophic, dilated and left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathies, respectively. Long-term survival rates of children with a restrictive phenotype have largely been obscured by early listing for heart transplantation. In general, the majority of adverse events, including death and heart transplantation, occur during the first 2 years after the initial presentation. This review provides an overview of childhood cardiomyopathies with a focus on epidemiology, natural history, and outcomes.

Childhood Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Disease of the Cardiac Sarcomere

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the second most common cause of cardiomyopathy presenting during childhood and whilst its underlying aetiology is variable, the majority of disease is caused by sarcomeric protein gene variants. Sarcomeric disease can present at any age with highly variable disease phenotype, progression and outcomes. The majority have good childhood-outcomes with reported 5-year survival rates above 80%. However, childhood onset disease is associated with considerable life-long morbidity and mortality, including a higher SCD rate during childhood than seen in adults. Management is currently focused on relieving symptoms and preventing disease-related complications, but the possibility of future disease-modifying therapies offers an exciting opportunity to modulate disease expression and outcomes in these young patients.

2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This executive summary of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinical practice guideline provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to diagnose and manage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in adult and pediatric patients as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases.

STRUCTURE

Many recommendations from the earlier hypertrophic cardiomyopathy guidelines have been updated with new evidence or a better understanding of earlier evidence. This summary operationalizes the recommendations from the full guideline and presents a combination of diagnostic work-up, genetic and family screening, risk stratification approaches, lifestyle modifications, surgical and catheter interventions, and medications that constitute components of guideline directed medical therapy. For both guideline-directed medical therapy and other recommended drug treatment regimens, the reader is advised to follow dosing, contraindications and drug-drug interactions based on product insert materials.

2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

Aim This executive summary of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinical practice guideline provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to diagnose and manage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in adult and pediatric patients as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Structure Many recommendations from the earlier hypertrophic cardiomyopathy guidelines have been updated with new evidence or a better understanding of earlier evidence. This summary operationalizes the recommendations from the full guideline and presents a combination of diagnostic work-up, genetic and family screening, risk stratification approaches, lifestyle modifications, surgical and catheter interventions, and medications that constitute components of guideline directed medical therapy. For both guideline-directed medical therapy and other recommended drug treatment regimens, the reader is advised to follow dosing, contraindications and drug-drug interactions based on product insert materials.

Family screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Is it time to change practice guidelines?

Aims

Current guidelines recommend initiating family screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) after age 10 or 12 years unless early screening criteria are met. The aim was to evaluate if current screening guidelines miss early onset disease.

Methods and results

Children who underwent family screening for HCM before age 18 years were analysed. Major cardiac events (MaCEs) were defined as death, sudden cardiac death (SCD), or need for major cardiac interventions (myectomy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion, transplantation). Of 524 children screened, 331 were under 10 years of age, 9.9% had echocardiographic evidence of HCM, and 1.1% were symptomatic at first screening. The median (interquartile range) age at HCM onset was 8.9 (4.7–13.4) years, and at MaCE was 10.9 (8.5–14.3) years with a median time to MaCE from HCM onset of 1.5 (0.5–4.1) years. About 52.5% phenotype-positive children and 41% with MaCEs were <10 years old. Only 69% children with early HCM met early screening criteria. Cox regression identified male gender, family history of SCD, and pathogenic variants in MYH7/MYBPC3 as a predictor of early onset HCM and MaCEs.

Conclusion

A third of children not eligible for early screening by current guidelines had phenotype-positive HCM. MYH7 and MYBC3 mutation-positive patients were at highest risk for developing early HCM and experiencing an event or requiring a major intervention. Our findings suggest that younger family members should be considered for early clinical and genetic screening to identify the subset in need of closer monitoring and interventions.

Prediction and Prevention of Sudden Death in Young Patients (<20 years) With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Highly reliable identification of adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) at risk for sudden death (SD) has been reported. A significant controversy remains, however, regarding the most reliable risk stratification methodology for children and adolescents with HC. The present study assesses the accuracy of SD prediction and prevention with prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in young HC patients. The study group is comprised of 146 HC patients <20 years of age evaluated consecutively over 17 years with prospective risk stratification and ICD decision-making. We relied on ≥1 established individual risk markers considered major within each patient's clinical profile, based on an enhanced American College of Cardiology /American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines algorithm. Of the 60 largely asymptomatic patients implanted with primary prevention ICDs at age 15 ± 4 years, 9 (15%) experienced device therapy terminating potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias and restoring sinus rhythm at 19 ± 6 years (range 9 to 29), 5.1 ± 6.0 years after implant; 3 patients had multiple appropriate ICD discharges. The individual risk marker algorithm was associated with 100% sensitivity in predicting SD events (95%CI: 69, 100) and 63% specificity for identifying patients without events (95%CI: 54, 71). Of these patients with device therapy, massive left ventricular hypertrophy (absolute wall thickness ≥30 mm) was the most common predictor, present in 70% of patients either alone or in combination with other risk markers. Each of the 146 study patients have survived to date at 22 ± 5 years, including all 86 without ICD recommendations. In conclusion, an enhanced ACC/AHA risk stratification strategy, based on established individual risk markers, was highly reliable in prospectively predicting SD events in children and adolescents with HC, and preventing arrhythmia-based catastrophes in this susceptible high risk population.

A Validated Model for Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Prediction in Pediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in children and young adults. Our objective was to develop and validate a SCD risk prediction model in pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to guide SCD prevention strategies.

METHODS

In an international multicenter observational cohort study, phenotype-positive patients with isolated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy <18 years of age at diagnosis were eligible. The primary outcome variable was the time from diagnosis to a composite of SCD events at 5-year follow-up: SCD, resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest, and aborted SCD, that is, appropriate shock following primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Competing risk models with cause-specific hazard regression were used to identify and quantify clinical and genetic factors associated with SCD. The cause-specific regression model was implemented using boosting, and tuned with 10 repeated 4-fold cross-validations. The final model was fitted using all data with the tuned hyperparameter value that maximizes the c-statistic, and its performance was characterized by using the c-statistic for competing risk models. The final model was validated in an independent external cohort (SHaRe [Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry], n=285).

RESULTS

Overall, 572 patients met eligibility criteria with 2855 patient-years of follow-up. The 5-year cumulative proportion of SCD events was 9.1% (14 SCD, 25 resuscitated sudden cardiac arrests, and 14 aborted SCD). Risk predictors included age at diagnosis, documented nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, unexplained syncope, septal diameter z-score, left ventricular posterior wall diameter z score, left atrial diameter z score, peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient, and presence of a pathogenic variant. Unlike in adults, left ventricular outflow tract gradient had an inverse association, and family history of SCD had no association with SCD. Clinical and clinical/genetic models were developed to predict 5-year freedom from SCD. Both models adequately discriminated between patients with and without SCD events with a c-statistic of 0.75 and 0.76, respectively, and demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed events in the primary and validation cohorts (validation c-statistic 0.71 and 0.72, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides a validated SCD risk prediction model with >70% prediction accuracy and incorporates risk factors that are unique to pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. An individualized risk prediction model has the potential to improve the application of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision making for implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT0403679.

Development of a Novel Risk Prediction Model for Sudden Cardiac Death in Childhood Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM Risk-Kids)

Importance

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most common mode of death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but there is no validated algorithm to identify those at highest risk.

Objective

To develop and validate an SCD risk prediction model that provides individualized risk estimates.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A prognostic model was developed from a retrospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study of 1024 consecutively evaluated patients aged 16 years or younger with HCM. The study was conducted from January 1, 1970, to December 31, 2017.

Exposures

The model was developed using preselected predictor variables (unexplained syncope, maximal left-ventricular wall thickness, left atrial diameter, left-ventricular outflow tract gradient, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia) identified from the literature and internally validated using bootstrapping.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A composite outcome of SCD or an equivalent event (aborted cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, or sustained ventricular tachycardia associated with hemodynamic compromise).

Results

Of the 1024 patients included in the study, 699 were boys (68.3%); mean (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 11 (7-14) years. Over a median follow-up of 5.3 years (IQR, 2.6-8.3; total patient years, 5984), 89 patients (8.7%) died suddenly or had an equivalent event (annual event rate, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.92). The pediatric model was developed using preselected variables to predict the risk of SCD. The model's ability to predict risk at 5 years was validated; the C statistic was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.72), and the calibration slope was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.59-1.38). For every 10 implantable cardioverter defibrillators implanted in patients with 6% or more of a 5-year SCD risk, 1 patient may potentially be saved from SCD at 5 years.

Conclusions and Relevance

This new, validated risk stratification model for SCD in childhood HCM may provide individualized estimates of risk at 5 years using readily obtained clinical risk factors. External validation studies are required to demonstrate the accuracy of this model's predictions in diverse patient populations.