Flecainide in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve syndrome: A case series

Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse: In which patients should primary prevention of sudden cardiac death be considered and how should it be implemented?

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) affects 2-3% of the population and is generally benign. However, a subgroup presents severe complications such as ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) combines MVP with frequent or complex ventricular arrhythmias in the absence of other causes. Although SCD in AMVP patients is rare (0.2-0.4%, annual), it exceeds the general population rate and is associated with specific high arrhythmic risk features, such as mitral annular disjunction (MAD), bileaflet prolapse, Pickelhaube sign, abnormal T waves on the electrocardiogram, and rapid non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Primary prevention is crucial but challenged by the lack of standardized guidelines. AMVP requires a multidisciplinary and cost-effective evaluation to stratify risk and prevent SCD in a predominantly young and healthy population. The objective of this review is to describe the variables with the highest arrhythmogenic risk in patients with MVP and the possible primary prevention strategies for sudden cardiac death.

Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management Strategies

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common disease in which ventricular arrhythmias/sudden cardiac death can be the first symptom of presentation. This review article explores the current understanding of underlying pathological mechanisms leading to an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of MVP and elaborates on the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of the disease.

Mitral valve prolapse in sudden cardiac arrest survivors: Coincidence or causal relationship?

BACKGROUND

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) risk stratification in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) may be complicated by other potential causes of arrhythmia.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to characterize SCA survivors with isolated MVP (iMVP) and non-isolated MVP (non-iMVP) and to assess their long-term follow-up.

METHODS

This ambispective study included 75 patients with MVP who experienced SCA and were treated in our center between 2009 and 2024. They were divided into 3 groups according to probability of relation between SCA and comorbidities. The control group comprised 112 participants with MVP but without a history of SCA. We analyzed all available electrocardiograms, Holter electrocardiography monitoring, and echocardiograms, including longitudinal strain. A novel parameter, the systolic atrial-directed notch (SADN), was tested.

RESULTS

SCA survivors with iMVP (n = 28) had higher prevalence of mitral annular disjunction (80% vs 35.7%; P = .006), Pickelhaube sign (60% vs 8.3%; P = .008), and SADN >2 mm (69.6% vs 14.3%; P = .001) as well as higher absolute longitudinal strain values in basal and mid segments of the inferior and inferolateral wall than patients with SCA and non-iMVP without other defined structural heart diseases (n = 14). The differences were also observed in comparison to the control group. The cumulative incidence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks within 6 years was 62% in patients with iMVP and 23% in the group with non-iMVP without other defined structural heart diseases.

CONCLUSION

Echocardiographic findings such as mitral annular disjunction, SADN, Pickelhaube sign, and increased segmental strain may be useful in the assessment of the relation between SCA and MVP. Malignant arrhythmias often recur in SCA survivors with iMVP.

Mitral Annular Disjunction in the Context of Mitral Valve Prolapse: Identifying the At-Risk Patient

Mitral annular disjunction (MAD), a separation between the left atrium/mitral valve annulus and the left ventricular myocardium, is frequently seen in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse. Although an association exists between MAD and ventricular arrhythmias, little is known regarding the identification of individuals at high risk. Multimodality imaging including echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography can play an important role in both the diagnosis and risk stratification of MAD. Due to a paucity of data, clinical decision making in a patient with MAD is challenging and remains largely empirical. Although MAD itself can be corrected surgically, the prevention and treatment of associated arrhythmias may require medical therapy, catheter ablation, and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Prospective data are required to define the role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, targeted catheter ablation, and surgical correction in selected, at-risk patients.

Ranolazine Unveiled: Rediscovering an Old Solution in a New Light

Ranolazine is an anti-anginal medication that has demonstrated antiarrhythmic properties by inhibiting both late sodium and potassium currents. Studies have shown promising results for ranolazine in treating both atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias, particularly when used in combination with other medications. This review explores ranolazine's mechanisms of action and its potential role in cardiac arrhythmias treatment in light of previous clinical studies.

Case report: arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse syndrome-are risk factors underdiagnosed?

Background

Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse syndrome (ARMV) is a recognized but underdiagnosed disease pattern. Risk factors for ARMV are established but not very well known, and the association of the structural abnormality with ventricular arrhythmias is incompletely understood.

Case summary

Here, we present the case of a young man who presented at our hospital for radiofrequency catheter ablation and mitral valve surgery after two episodes of survived sudden cardiac arrest. We discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies that were used. We shine light on the risk factors for ARMV and why early identification is crucial. We address the topic of primary prevention and its limitations. Finally, we discuss different treatment modalities for patients with ARMV.

Discussion

More awareness for ARMV is crucial. A consensus statement on clinical management exists, but scientific gaps in prospective data for primary prevention need to be filled and there is a need for a better understanding of the pathogenesis of ARMV.

Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse Syndrome and Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Comprehensive Review and the Role of Catheter Ablation

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) affects 2-3% of the general population, and despite its benign prognosis overall, it is associated with sudden death in a small subset of patients. The term "arrhythmic MVP syndrome" (AMVPS) refers to the presence of frequent or complex ventricular arrhythmias, commonly reported in female patients with a stereotypical phenotype including bileaflet myxomatous disease, ECG repolarisation abnormalities in inferior leads, mitral annular disjunction, and significant fibrosis in the inferolateral LV and papillary muscles. Modern imaging technologies have led to the identification of new risk factors that have been implemented in recent risk stratification guidelines; however, screening for patients with MVP who are at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains challenging. In addition, there is a limited amount of data on the outcomes of different treatment approaches in AMVP and no specific indication for targeted or disease-modifying therapies within current guidelines. Potential arrhythmic substrates in patients with AMVP syndrome have been the subject of interest in previous studies, with areas consisting of fibrosis at the papillary muscle level and the Purkinje system. Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) originating from these areas have been shown to play an important role as triggers for ventricular fibrillation and SCD in patients with AMVP. Catheter ablation has emerged as a potential treatment modality in patients with MVP and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), targeting arrhythmic substrates and triggering PVC foci. The aim of this review is to explore the role of catheter ablation in treating patients with AMVP.

Mitral annular disjunction in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation patients: just a bystander or a potential cause?

AIMS

Previously, we demonstrated that inferolateral mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is more prevalent in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) than in healthy controls. In the present study, we advanced the insights into the prevalence and ventricular arrhythmogenicity by inferolateral MAD in an even larger IVF cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective multi-centre study included 185 IVF patients [median age 39 (27, 52) years, 40% female]. Cardiac magnetic resonance images were analyzed for mitral valve and annular abnormalities and late gadolinium enhancement. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without MAD. MAD in any of the 4 locations was present in 112 (61%) IVF patients and inferolateral MAD was identified in 24 (13%) IVF patients. Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) was found in 13 (7%) IVF patients. MVP was more prevalent in patients with inferolateral MAD compared with patients without inferolateral MAD (42 vs. 2%, P < 0.001). Pro-arrhythmic characteristics in terms of a high burden of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) were more prevalent in patients with inferolateral MAD compared to patients without inferolateral MAD (67 vs. 23%, P < 0.001 and 63 vs. 41%, P = 0.046, respectively). Appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy during follow-up was comparable for IVF patients with or without inferolateral MAD (13 vs. 18%, P = 0.579).

CONCLUSION

A high prevalence of inferolateral MAD and MVP is a consistent finding in this large IVF cohort. The presence of inferolateral MAD is associated with a higher PVC burden and non-sustained VTs. Further research is needed to explain this potential interplay.

Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sports Activity: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Sports Eligibility Assessment

Although mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most prevalent valvular abnormality in Western countries and generally carries a good prognosis, a small subset of patients is exposed to a significant risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), the so-called arrhythmic MVP (AMVP) syndrome. Recent work has emphasized phenotypical risk features of severe AMVP and clarified its pathophysiology. However, the appropriate assessment and risk stratification of patients with suspected AMVP remains a clinical conundrum, with the possibility of both overestimating and underestimating the risk of malignant VAs, with the inappropriate use of advanced imaging and invasive electrophysiology study on one hand, and the catastrophic occurrence of SCD on the other. Furthermore, the sports eligibility assessment of athletes with AMVP remains ill defined, especially in the grey zone of intermediate arrhythmic risk. The definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and treatment of AMVP are covered in the present review. Considering recent guidelines and expert consensus statements, we propose a comprehensive pathway to facilitate appropriate counseling concerning the practice of competitive/leisure-time sports, envisioning shared decision making and the multidisciplinary "sports heart team" evaluation of borderline cases. Our final aim is to encourage an active lifestyle without compromising patients' safety.

Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse and mitral annular disjunction: pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most frequent valve condition but remains a conundrum in many aspects, particularly in regard to the existence and frequency of an arrhythmic form (AMVP) and its link to sudden cardiac death. Furthermore, the presence, frequency, and significance of the anatomic functional feature called mitral annular disjunction (MAD) have remained widely disputed. Recent case series and cohorts have shattered the concept that MVP is most generally benign and have emphasized the various phenotypes associated with clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias, including AMVP. The definition, evaluation, follow-up, and management of AMVP represent the focus of the present review, strengthened by recent coherent studies defining an arrhythmic MVP phenotypic that would affect a small subset of patients with MVP at concentrated high risk. The role of MAD in this context is of particular importance, and this review highlights the characteristics of AMVP phenotypes and MAD, their clinical, multimodality imaging, and rhythmic evaluation. These seminal facts lead to proposing a risk stratification clinical pathway with consideration of medical, rhythmologic, and surgical management and have been objects of recent expert consensus statements and of proposals for new research directions.

Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse in 2023: Evidence-based update

Patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) may develop ventricular arrhythmias, ranging from premature ventricular contractions through more complex non-sustained ventricular tachycardia to sustained life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The prevalence of MVP in autopsy series of young adults who died suddenly has been estimated to be between 4% and 7%. Thus, "arrhythmic MVP" has been reported as an underappreciated cause of sudden cardiac death, leading to a renewed interest in the study of this association. The term "arrhythmic MVP" refers to a small subset of patients who have, in the absence of any other arrhythmic substrate, MVP, with or without mitral annular disjunction, and frequent or complex ventricular arrhythmias. Our understanding of their coexistence in terms of contemporary management and prognosis is still incomplete. While literature regarding the arrhythmic MVP may be contrasting despite recent consensus document, the present review summarizes the relevant evidence concerning the diagnostic approach, prognostic implications, and targeted therapies for MVP-related ventricular arrhythmias. We also summarize recent data supporting left ventricular remodeling, which complicates the coexistence of MVP with ventricular arrhythmias. As the evidence for a putative link between MVP-associated ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death is scarce and based on scant and retrospective data, risk prediction remains a challenge. Thus, we aimed at listing potential risk factors from available seminal reports for further use in a more reliable prediction model that requires additional prospective data. Finally, we summarize evidence and guidelines on targeted therapies of ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of MVP, including implantable cardioverter defibrillators and catheter ablation. Our review highlights current knowledge gaps and provides an action plan for structured research on the pathophysiological genesis, diagnosis, prognostic impact, and optimal management of patients with arrhythmic MVP.