Gastric hepatoid adenocarcinomas are a genetically heterogenous group; most tumors show chromosomal instability, but MSI tumors do exist

Case Report: Second-line favourable effect of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in a patient with metastatic hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. HAS is characterized by both adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma like differentiation, which often produces alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and responds poorly to systemic chemotherapy. Herein we report a case of 62-year-old male diagnosed with liver metastatic HAS, who progressed rapidly after first-line cisplatin + fluorouracil chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. However, the patient achieved favourable outcome after second-line oxaliplatin + capecitatine chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab. This case indicated that the chemotherapy regimen might influence the efficacy of immune check-point inhibiors plus chemotherapy.

Volume of hepatoid component and intratumor M2 macrophages predict prognosis in patients with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach

BACKGROUND

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS), a subtype of gastric cancer (GC), includes multiple tumor components, such as enteroblastic and tubular adenocarcinoma components. However, which component mostly contributes to the aggressive behavior of HAS remains unclear. Moreover, the role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) has not been explored in HAS. This study evaluated the clinical significance of the proportion of the hepatoid component within the tumor, CD163 + macrophages, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) in HAS.

METHODS

In total, 56 cases of primary HAS were analyzed. In each case, hepatoid (HC), enteroblastic (EC), and tubular (TC) components were identified, and the ratio of HC to the entire tumor (hepatoid component ratio, HCR) was assessed to examine the correlation between HCR and clinicopathological features. Immunohistochemical staining for CD163 and CSF-1 was performed, and differences in immunohistochemical results among the three tumor components were analyzed. In each tumor component, the prognostic impact of CD163 and CSF-1 was examined.

RESULTS

A high HCR was associated with worse overall survival (OS). CD163 + TAMs and CSF-1 immunoreactivity score in HC were significantly higher than those in the other components. High infiltration of CD163 + TAMs and a high CSF-1 immunoreactivity score in HC were associated with an aggressive course and worse OS. Multivariate analysis revealed the proportion of HC in HAS as an independent prognostic factor (HR = 3.176, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The HCR and CD163 + TAMs may be useful prognostic predictors, and TAMs may be novel therapeutic targets of HAS.

Exploration of molecular markers related to chemotherapy efficacy of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach

PURPOSE

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy may not improve the prognosis of patients with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS), a rare pathological type of gastric cancer. Thus, the study aimed at the genomic and transcriptomic impacts of preoperative chemotherapy on HAS.

METHODS

Patients with HAS who underwent surgical resection at Peking University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively included in this study. Whole exome sequencing and transcriptome sequencing were performed on pre-chemotherapy, non-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy samples. We then compared the alterations in molecular markers between the post-chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy groups, and between the chemotherapy-effective and chemotherapy-ineffective groups, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 79 tumor samples from 72 patients were collected. Compared to the non-chemotherapy group, the mutation frequencies of several genes were changed after chemotherapy, including TP53. In addition, there was a significant increase in the frequency of frameshift mutations and cytosine transversion to adenine (C > A), appearance of COSMIC signature 6 and 14, and a reduced gene copy number amplification. Interestingly, the same phenomenon was observed in chemotherapy-ineffective patients. In addition, many HAS patients had ERBB2, FGFR2, MET and HGF gene amplification. Moreover, the expression of immune-related genes, especially those related to lymphocyte activation, was down-regulated after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy is closely associated with changes in the molecular characteristics of HAS. After chemotherapy, at genomic and transcriptome level, many features were altered. These changes may be molecular markers of poor chemotherapeutic efficacy and play an important role in chemoresistance in HAS. In addition, ERBB2, FGFR2, MET and HGF gene amplification may be potential therapeutic targets for HAS.

Immunohistochemical characteristics and potential therapeutic regimens of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a study of 139 cases

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of stomach (HAS) is a special subtype of gastric cancer with poor prognosis. Immunohistochemical analysis could provide important clues for the treatment of HAS. A total of 159 patients were diagnosed as HAS and 139 were enrolled in this study. Statistical differences were determined using relative test methods and survival analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method to find survival differences. All tumors in this study were negative for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNAs (EBERs) and almost all showed no loss of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and were positive for alpha fetoprotein (AFP or spalt like transcription factor 4 (SALL4). About half of the tumors had a positive programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) and 17.3% were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). In addition, there was a relatively high proportion of cmet expression. We also found that HAS patients with recurrent disease treated by emerging therapy had a better survival than those treated with traditional chemotherapy (p = 0.002, median recurrence-to-death survival: 23 months versus 6 months); HAS patients who received anti-HER2 therapy or harbored MMR deficiency had favorable prognosis. Overall, high proportions of MMR protein proficiency, positivity for AFP or SALL4, overexpression of HER2, CPS and cmet, as well as negative EBER findings, are distinctive characteristics of HAS patients. While negative EBER and MMR proficiency indicate molecular features of HAS, positivity for AFP or SALL4 could aid in the diagnosis of HAS. In addition, HAS patients could benefit from anti-HER2 therapy, immunotherapy, and anti-angiogenesis therapy.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach with neuroendocrine differentiation: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Both hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) and neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) are rare histological subtypes of gastric cancer with unique clinicopathological features and unfavorable outcomes. HAS with NED is even rarer.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we report a 61-year-old man with HAS with NED, as detected by gastric wall thickening by positron emission tomography/computed tomography for a pulmonary nodule. Distal gastrectomy was performed, and pathological examination led to the diagnosis of HAS with NED. However, liver metastases occurred 6 mo later despite adjuvant chemotherapy, and the patient died 27 mo postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

We treated a patient with HAS with NED who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery and still developed liver metastases. We first report the detailed processes of the treatment and development of HAS with NED, providing an important reference for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this condition.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach with neuroendocrine differentiation: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Both hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) and neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) are rare histological subtypes of gastric cancer with unique clinicopathological features and unfavorable outcomes. HAS with NED is even rarer.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we report a 61-year-old man with HAS with NED, as detected by gastric wall thickening by positron emission tomography/computed tomography for a pulmonary nodule. Distal gastrectomy was performed, and pathological examination led to the diagnosis of HAS with NED. However, liver metastases occurred 6 mo later despite adjuvant chemotherapy, and the patient died 27 mo postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

We treated a patient with HAS with NED who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery and still developed liver metastases. We first report the detailed processes of the treatment and development of HAS with NED, providing an important reference for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this condition.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma-Clinicopathological features and molecular characteristics

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) is a rare, malignant, extrahepatic tumor with histologic features similar to those of hepatocellular carcinoma. HAC is most often associated with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). HAC can occur in multiple organs, including the stomach, esophagus, colon, pancreas, lungs, and ovaries. HAC differs greatly from typical adenocarcinoma in terms of its biological aggression, poor prognosis, and clinicopathological characteristics. However, the mechanisms underlying its development and invasive metastasis remain unclear. The purpose of this review was to summarize the clinicopathological features, molecular traits, and molecular mechanisms driving the malignant phenotype of HAC, in order to support the clinical diagnosis and treatment of HAC.

Hepatoid tumors of the gastrointestinal/pancreatobiliary district: morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular profiles

Hepatoid tumors (HTs) histologically resemble hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but manifest outside the liver. Regarding immunohistochemistry (IHC), the classical markers of hepatoid differentiation are Hep Par-1, CD10, and arginase-1. This study provides a critical overview of HT in the gastrointestinal/biliopancreatic system, which is the most common site of origin. Gastric HTs are malignant neoplasms recognized by the current WHO classification as a variant of adenocarcinoma. In addition to the classic IHC markers, SALL4 and claudin-6 can help exclude a metastatic HCC at this site. Next-generation sequencing revealed the most common alterations, including TP53 mutation, microsatellite instability (MSI), and Her2 amplification. Esophageal HTs are exceptionally rare and usually arise in the context of Barrett's esophagus. In the intestine, HTs are classified within the adenocarcinoma spectrum and manifest more often in the background of inflammatory bowel disease. Regarding their molecular profile, recurrent alterations included MSI and NCOA4-RET fusions. In the pancreas, the current WHO classification acknowledges HT only as a possible variant of ductal adenocarcinoma, characterized by a poor prognosis. However, at this site, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) may also show hepatoid differentiation. Hepatoid NETs show aggressive behavior, whereas hepatoid SPNs harbor CTNNB1 mutations and are characterized by an indolent clinical course. Lastly, biliary HTs belong to the adenocarcinoma category and usually show a poor prognosis. In conclusion, gastrointestinal/pancreatobiliary HTs show specific histomolecular features, which should be considered for improving routine diagnostic activity and clinical management.

Prognostic significance of preoperative serum tumor markers in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of stomach (HAS)

BACKGROUND

The role of preoperative serum tumor markers in HAS patients was vague, we designed the study to explore the effect of preoperative serum tumor markers on predicting the prognosis of HAS patients.

METHODS

A total of 139 patients were included according to the different tumor makers. X-tile tool was employed to identify the optimal cut-off values of respective tumor makers. Multivariate analyses were conducted to determine independent risk factors.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for 3-years overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 516 ng/mL. Patients with high-level AFP values assumed significantly worse OS and RFS than those with low-level AFP values (P = 0.028 and P = 0.011, respectively). The optimal cut-off value of Carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 for OS and RFS was 51.3 U/mL. And the survival results were similar with AFP in the aspects of OS and RFS (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that high serum AFP was an independent risk factor for OS and RFS of HAS patients (HR7.264; 95% CI 1.328-39.738; P = 0.022 and HR 2.688; 95% CI 0.922-7.836; P = 0.070, respectively). CA19-9 could perform as a fair substitute to predict the HAS patients' OS and RFS when the preoperative serum AFP was unavailable (HR 7.816; 95% CI 2.084-29.308; P = 0.002 and HR 4.386; 95% CI 1.824-10.547; P = 0.001, respectively). Other tumor markers didn't present significant influences.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying preoperative serum AFP level to predict the HAS patients' prognosis is feasible and preoperative serum high-AFP is an independent risk factor for OS and RFS of HAS patients. Preoperative serum CA19-9 could be an alternative choice when AFP was absent.

High-grade Endometrial Carcinoma With a Hepatoid Carcinoma-like Component

Endometrial carcinoma with hepatoid differentiation is rare and <20 reported cases have been reported as endometrial hepatoid carcinoma (EHC). We present a case of EHC associated with serous carcinoma in a 76-yr-old Japanese woman. The hepatoid component showed trabecular, pseudoglandular, and diffuse proliferation of hepatoid cells. The hepatoid cells were positive for α-fetoprotein, Hep-Per-1, glypican 3, and HNF-1β, weakly and focally positive for SALL4, and negative for PAX8. Both of the serous and hepatoid components showed overexpression of p53. The serum α-fetoprotein on postoperative day 5 was 3691 ng/mL. The postoperative course has remained uneventful for 4 yr. These findings suggested that EHC developed from serous carcinoma by acquiring hepatocytic features and losing Müllerian features. Both serous and hepatoid components showed p53 overexpression, suggesting they share a TP53 mutation as a common primary driver.

Integrative analysis reveals a clinicogenomic landscape associated with liver metastasis and poor prognosis in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare subtype of gastric cancer (GC) that histologically resembles hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite its low incidence, HAS had a poor 5-year survival rate. Currently, the linkages between clinicopathological and genomic features of HAS and its therapeutic targets remain largely unknown. Herein, we enrolled 90 HAS patients and 270 stage-matched non-HAS patients from our institution for comparing clinicopathological features. We found that HAS had worse overall survival and were more prone to develop liver metastasis than non-HAS in our cohort, which was validated via meta-analysis. By comparing whole-exome sequencing data of HAS (n=30), non-HAS (n=63), and HCC (n=355, The Cancer Genome Atlas), we identified a genomic landscape associated with unfavorable clinical features in HAS, which contained frequent somatic mutations and widespread copy number variations. Notably, signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells affected by frequent genomic alterations might contribute to liver metastasis and poor prognosis in HAS patients. Furthermore, HAS developed abundant multiclonal architecture associated with liver metastasis. Encouragingly, target analysis suggested that HAS patients might potentially benefit from anti-ERBB2 or anti-PD-1 therapy. Taken together, this study systematically demonstrated a high risk of liver metastasis and poor prognosis in HAS, provided a clinicogenomic landscape underlying these unfavorable clinical features, and identified potential therapeutic targets, laying the foundations for developing precise diagnosis and therapy in this rare but lethal disease.

Comprehensive Analysis of Genomic Alterations in Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Identification of Clinically Actionable Alterations

Simple Summary

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a subset of gastric cancer (GC) histologically characterized by hepatocellular carcinoma-like foci with or without alpha-fetoprotein secretion, which is easily misdiagnosed. Genomic alterations and potential targets for this population are still largely unknown. Additionally, treatment regimens of HAS are mainly based on GC guidelines, which is not reasonable for diseases with great heterogeneity. The present study comprehensively depicts the genomic features of HAS, and they are significantly different from GC, AFP-producing GC (AFPGC), and liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC). Multiple aggressive behavior-related amplificated or deleted regions in HAS are firstly reported. Moreover, reliable and practicable clinically actionable alterations for HAS are identified, providing evidence for making personalized therapy based on the genomic characteristics of HAS instead of GC.

Abstract

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare malignancy with aggressive biological behavior. This study aimed to compare the genetic landscape of HAS with liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), gastric cancer (GC), and AFP-producing GC (AFPGC) and identify clinically actionable alterations. Thirty-eight cases of HAS were collected for whole-exome sequencing. Significantly mutated genes were identified. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene (66%). Hypoxia, TNF-α/NFκB, mitotic spindle assembly, DNA repair, and p53 signaling pathways mutated frequently. Mutagenesis mechanisms in HAS were associated with spontaneous or enzymatic deamination of 5-methylcytosine to thymine and defective homologous recombination-related DNA damage repair. However, LIHC was characteristic of exposure to aflatoxin and aristolochic acid. The copy number variants (CNVs) in HAS was significantly different compared to LIHC, GC, and AFPGC. Aggressive behavior-related CNVs were identified, including local vascular invasion, advanced stages, and adverse prognosis. In 55.26% of HAS patients there existed at least one clinically actionable alteration, including ERBB2, FGFR1, CDK4, EGFR, MET, and MDM2 amplifications and BRCA1/2 mutations. MDM2 amplification with functional TP53 was detected in 5% of HAS patients, which was proved sensitive to MDM2 inhibitors. A total of 10.53% of HAS patients harbored TMB > 10 muts/Mb. These findings improve our understanding of the genomic features of HAS and provide potential therapeutic targets.

Distinct molecular phenotype and the potential prognostic value of immune prognostic index and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of stomach

•

Molecular classification of HAS should be mainly categorized into GS and CIN phenotypes with TP53 mutation.

•

TILs and dNLR may help to screen appropriate candidates for ICIs treatment in HAS.

•

dNLR demonstrated the potentiality as a reliable and economic predictor of prognosis in HAS.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a particular subtype of Gastric cancer (GC) with distinct pathological characteristics and genetic profile, but most HAS patients were received identical regimens as common GC. To date, only a few studies has been conducted to investigate the molecular characteristics of HAS, which may prevent the rational application of new anticancer strategies. To further obtain the genetic features and potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers of HAS, our current study evaluated the clinical implications of spectrum molecular markers in 36 surgical resection specimens. None Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive and/or micro-satellite instable high (MSI-h) tumors occurred in our study implies that the molecular classification of HAS should be mainly categorized into genomic stable (GS) and chromosomal instability (CIN) phenotypes, and wild type P53 status predicts better prognosis. More importantly, although the prognosis and clinical characteristics were independent of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) still suggested that a portion of the enrolled HAS patients are potentially appropriate candidates for immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Additionally, the immune prognostic index (IPI) and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) demonstrated their potential as reliable and economic indicators for predicting prognosis of HAS. We hope this first systematic evaluation will help in deciphering the molecular characterization and potential individualized regimens for this particular subtype of GC.

Tumor progression by epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ARID1A- and SMARCA4-aberrant solid-type poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma

Solid-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) of the stomach is frequently associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and aberrations of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Previous studies showed that aberrant ARID1A and SMARCA4 expression induces mesenchymal transition. We analyzed 51 primary-site cases and 209 metastatic lymph nodes among solid-type PDA for the expression of SWI/SNF complex subunits (ARID1A, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, SMARCC2) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers (E-cadherin, β-catenin, Snail). We also analyzed 40 cases of non-solid-type PDA as a stage-matched control group. Aberrant expression of ARID1A (39%) and SMARCA4 (49%) was more common in solid-type PDA than in non-solid-type PDA (ARID1A, P = 0.0049; SMARCA4, P < 0.0001). The group of solid-type PDA with aberrant ARID1A showed significantly longer overall and progression-free survival than the corresponding ARID1A-retained group (P = 0.0405 and P = 0.0296, respectively). Aberrant expression of EMT factors inducing mesenchymal transition in the groups with solid-type PDA at the primary site or metastatic lymph nodes with aberrant ARID1A was less common than in the corresponding groups with retained ARID1A (E-cadherin, primary site P = 0.0341, lymph node P < 0.0001; β-catenin, primary site P = 0.0293, lymph node P = 0.0010; Snail, primary site P = 0.0169, lymph node P = 0.0828). Furthermore, N3 of the TNM classification was more frequently observed in the group with solid-type PDA with retained ARID1A than in the corresponding ARID1A-aberrant group (P = 0.0288). Mesenchymal transition was not induced in the ARID1A-aberrant group, in which patients had favorable prognosis, and preserved epithelial characteristics in EMT may play an important role in low tumor aggressiveness of solid-type PDA.

Genomic characterization of hepatoid tumors: context matters

Hepatoid tumors (HT) are rare neoplasms morphologically resembling hepatocellular carcinoma, which arise in several organs other than the liver. A comprehensive molecular profile of this group of neoplasms is still lacking. Genomic characterization of 19 HTs from different organs (three colon HTs, four esophagogastric HTs, four biliary HTs, six genitourinary HTs, two lung HTs) was performed using a multigene next-generation sequencing panel. NGS unraveled a composite molecular profile of HT. Their genetic alterations were clearly clustered by tumor site: (i) colorectal HT displayed microsatellite instability, high tumor mutational burden, mutations in ARID1A/B genes and NCOA4-RET gene fusion (2/3 cases); (ii) gastric HT had TP53 mutations (2/4); (iii) biliary HT displayed loss of CDKN2A (3/4) and loss of chromosome 18 (2/4); (iv) genital HT showed gain of chromosome 12 (3/6); (v) lung HT had STK11 somatic mutations (2/2). The only commonly mutated gene occurring in HT of different sites was TP53 (8/19 cases: colon 2, esophagogastric 2, biliary 2, genital 1, lungs 1). This study shows that most genetic alterations of HT were clustered by site, indicating that context matters. The novel potential targets for HT precision oncology are also clustered based on the anatomic origin. This study shed light on the biology of these rare cancers and may have important consequences for treatment decisions and clinical trial selection for HT patients.

Assessment of Clinicopathological Characteristics and Development of an Individualized Prognostic Model for Patients With Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach

IMPORTANCE

Few studies have examined the clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of patients with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS).

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of patients with HAS and develop a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prognostic study involved a retrospective analysis of data from 315 patients who received a diagnosis of primary HAS between April 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019, at 14 centers in China.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

OS and prognostic factors. Patients were randomly assigned to a derivation cohort (n = 220) and a validation cohort (n = 95). A nomogram was developed based on independent prognostic factors identified through a multivariable Cox mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Among 315 patients with HAS (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [10.2] years; 240 men [76.2%]), 137 patients had simple HAS (defined as the presence of histologically contained hepatoid differentiation areas only), and 178 patients had mixed HAS (defined as the presence of hepatoid differentiation areas plus common adenocarcinoma areas). Patients with simple HAS had a higher median preoperative α-fetoprotein level than those with mixed HAS (195.9 ng/mL vs 48.9 ng/mL, respectively; P < .001) and a higher rate of preoperative liver metastasis (23 of 137 patients [16.8%] vs 11 of 178 patients [6.2%]; P = .003). The 3-year OS rates of patients with simple vs mixed HAS were comparable (56.0% vs 60.0%; log-rank P = .98). A multivariable Cox analysis of the derivation cohort found that the presence of perineural invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.27-3.55; P = .009), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels of 5 ng/mL or greater (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.08-2.74; P = .03), and pathological node category 3b (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.34-10.32; P = .01) were independent risk factors for worse OS. Based on these factors, a nomogram to predict postoperative OS was developed. The concordance indices of the nomogram (derivation cohort: 0.72 [95% CI, 0.66-0.78]; validation cohort: 0.72 [95% CI, 0.63-0.81]; whole cohort: 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66-0.76]) were higher than those derived using the American Joint Committee on Cancer's AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (8th edition) pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) staging system (derivation cohort: 0.63 [95% CI, 0.57-0.69]; validation cohort: 0.65 [95% CI, 0.56-0.75]; whole cohort: 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59-0.69]) and those derived using a clinical model that included pTNM stage and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (derivation cohort: 0.64 [95% CI, 0.58-0.69]; validation cohort: 0.65 [95% CI, 0.56-0.75]; whole cohort: 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59-0.69]). Based on the nomogram cutoff of 10 points, the whole cohort was divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. The 3-year OS rate of patients in the high-risk group was significantly lower than that of patients in the low-risk group (29.7% vs 75.9%, respectively; log-rank P < .001), and the 3-year prognosis of high-risk and low-risk groups could be further distinguished into pTNM stage I to II (33.3% vs 80.2%; exact log-rank P = .15), stage III (34.3% vs 71.3%; log-rank P < .001), and stage IV (15.5% vs 70.3%; log-rank P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that perineural invasion, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels of 5 ng/mL or greater, and pathological node category 3b were independent risk factors associated with worse OS. An individualized nomogram was developed to predict OS among patients with HAS. This nomogram had good prognostic value and may be useful as a supplement to the current American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system.

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Current Perspectives and New Developments

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare malignant tumor, accounting for only 0.17-15% of gastric cancers. Patients are often diagnosed at an advanced disease stage, and their symptoms are similar to conventional gastric cancer (CGC) without specific clinical manifestation. Morphologically, HAC has identical morphology and immunophenotype compared to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This is considered to be an underestimation in diagnosis due to its rare incidence, and no consensus is reached regarding therapy. HAS generally presents with more aggressive behavior and worse prognosis than CGC. The present review summarizes the current literature and relevant knowledge to elaborate on the epidemic, potential mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and prognosis to help clinicians accurately diagnose and treat this malignant tumor.

Integrated clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of gastric adenocarcinoma with hepatoid differentiation: an exploration of histogenesis, molecular characteristics, and prognostic markers

In addition to hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC), gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) and common adenocarcinoma (COM) could also show hepatoid differentiation, which presents a poor prognosis. To elucidate the histogenesis and development of gastric cancer with hepatoid differentiation, we identified 55 cases by histological morphology and a panel of markers, including α-fetoprotein (AFP), Glypican 3 (GPC3) and SALL4, then clinicopathological parameters, pathomorphological characteristics, mucin phenotypes, molecular features, Immunoscore and survival analysis were assessed. A mixture of three types (COM + GAED + HAC) was most commonly observed in the same case, and typical transitions between each histological subtype were frequently seen. Hyaline globule and pink amorphous substance were often present. HER2 was amplified in 21.8% of cases. All the tumors showed intestinal phenotype (69.1%) and mixed gastric/intestinal phenotype (30.9%) and were all defined to chromosomal instable (CIN)/genomically stable (GS) group. Considering that 83.6% cases presented TP53 gene mutation phenotype and 61.8% cases showed ≥10% aberrant E-cadherin expression, the precise molecule classification is ambiguous. Survival analysis showed that patients with high SALL4 expression, high preoperative serum AFP level, or low Immunoscore had a significantly poor overall survival (OS). Moreover, SALL4, HER2, and Immunoscore had an independent influence on OS. In conclusion, we suggest that the development of gastric adenocarcinoma with hepatoid differentiation might a continuously progressive profile: from intestinal-type COM adenocarcinoma to GAED and then HAC. CIN/GS subtypes might be where they belonged. SALL4, HER2, and Immunoscore may be potential therapeutic targets.

AFP-producing Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma: Case report and review of the literature

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a useful tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinomas and yolk sac tumors. Rare extrahepatic visceral malignancies may be associated with AFP production and those exhibiting a hepatoid differentiation by morphology and immunohistochemical are classified as hepatoid adenocarcinoma. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) producing AFP is a rare entity. To date, only one case of AFP-producing Xp11 translocation RCC has been reported. We reported another case of Xp11 translocation RCC, in which the tumor cells displayed strong immunostaining for AFP, HepPar1, and GPC-3. Additionally, the other published cases are reviewed.