Ecological effect of ceftazidime/avibactam on the normal human intestinal microbiota

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

METHODS

A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

RESULTS

These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

What to Do with the New Antibiotics?

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria-related infections have become a real public health problem and have exposed the risk of a therapeutic impasse. In recent years, many new antibiotics have been introduced to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium. Among these new molecules, some are mainly of interest for the treatment of the multidrug-resistant infections associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam); others are for carbapenem-resistant infections associated with Enterobacterales (ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam); and finally, there are others that are effective on the majority of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (cefiderocol). Most international guidelines recommend these new antibiotics in the treatment of microbiologically documented infections. However, given the significant morbidity and mortality of these infections, particularly in the case of inadequate therapy, it is important to consider the place of these antibiotics in probabilistic treatment. Knowledge of the risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (local ecology, prior colonization, failure of prior antibiotic therapy, and source of infection) seems necessary in order to optimize antibiotic prescriptions. In this review, we will assess these different antibiotics according to the epidemiological data.

Pharmacomicrobiomics in Pediatric Oncology: The Complex Interplay between Commonly Used Drugs and Gut Microbiome

The gut microbiome (GM) has emerged in the last few years as a main character in several diseases. In pediatric oncological patients, GM has a role in promoting the disease, modulating the effectiveness of therapies, and determining the clinical outcomes. The therapeutic course for most pediatric cancer influences the GM due to dietary modifications and several administrated drugs, including chemotherapies, antibiotics and immunosuppressants. Interestingly, increasing evidence is uncovering a role of the GM on drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, defining a bidirectional relationship. Indeed, the pediatric setting presents some contrasts with respect to the adult, since the GM undergoes a constant multifactorial evolution during childhood following external stimuli (such as diet modification during weaning). In this review, we aim to summarize the available evidence of pharmacomicrobiomics in pediatric oncology.

Moderate and transient impact of antibiotic use on the gut microbiota in a rural Vietnamese cohort

The human gut microbiota has been shown to be significantly perturbed by antibiotic use, while recovering to the pre-treatment state several weeks after short antibiotic exposure. The effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiota have however been mainly documented in high-income settings with lower levels of antibiotic resistance as compared to lower and middle income countries (LMIC). This study aimed to examine the long-term consequences of repeated exposure to commonly use antibiotics on the fecal microbiota of residents living in a low income setting with high prevalence of antibiotic resistance. Fecal samples from household individuals (n = 63) participating in a rural cohort in northern Vietnam were collected monthly for a period of 6 months. Using 16S V4 rRNA gene region amplicon sequencing and linear mixed-effects models analysis, we observed only a minor and transient effect of antibiotics on the microbial richness (ß = - 31.3, 95%CI = - 55.3, - 7.3, p = 0.011), while the microbial diversity was even less affected (ß = - 0.298, 95%CI - 0.686, 0.090, p = 0.132). Principal Component Analyses (PCA) did not reveal separation of samples into distinct microbiota-based clusters by antibiotics use, suggesting the microbiota composition was not affected by the antibiotics commonly used in this population. Additionally, the fecal microbial diversity of the subjects in our study cohort was lower when compared to that of healthy Dutch adults (median 3.95 (IQR 3.72-4.13) vs median 3.69 (IQR3.31-4.11), p = 0.028, despite the higher dietary fiber content in the Vietnamese as compared to western diet. Our findings support the hypothesis that frequent antibiotic exposure may push the microbiota to a different steady state that is less diverse but more resilient to disruption by subsequent antibiotic use.

Gastrointestinal colonization by OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales: risk factors for persistent carriage

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections are a major health problem. Intestinal colonization is a key factor in developing infection. However, factors associated with persistent colonization by CRE are unknown. The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with persistent CRE gut colonization. This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study of adult patients with CRE gut colonization between January 2015 and January 2020. Epidemiologic characteristics, comorbidities, infectious events, duration of hospitalization and antimicrobial treatment received in the follow-up period were collected. Colonization was defined as isolation in at least 2 rectal swab culture samples of CRE. Decolonization was defined as 3 negative rectal swab cultures or 2 negative cultures and a negative molecular test. A cohort of 86 patients with CRE gut colonization was selected: 44 patients with spontaneous decolonization (DC) and 42 patients with persistent colonization (PC). The mean follow-up period was 24 months (IQR 14-33) in the DC group vs. 25 months (IQR 16-36) in the PC group (p = 0.478). Patient characteristics were similar between both groups. Colonization by other MDR microorganisms was high (44 patients, 51%) and slightly more common in the PC group (PC 60% vs. DC 43%, p = 0.139). The use of ceftazidime-avibactam was more common among the PC group (PC 33% vs. DC 14%, p = 0.041). We observed a higher percentage of antimicrobial therapy in the previous 30 days (PC 68% vs. DC 57%, p = 0.371) and 90 days (PC 81% vs. DC 82%, p = 0.353) in the PC group. Multivariable analysis showed that patients that have received ceftazidime-avibactam therapy (OR 4.9 95% CI [1.45-16.39], p = 0.010), and those colonized by other MDR microorganisms (OR 2.5, 95% CI [0.96-6.25], p = 0.060) presented a higher risk of PC. Ceftazidime-avibactam use and colonization by other MDR microorganisms might be associated with CRE persistent gut colonization.

MiniBioReactor Array (MBRA) in vitro gut model: a reliable system to study microbiota-dependent response to antibiotic treatment

Background

Antimicrobial drugs are mostly studied for their impact on emergence of bacterial antibiotic resistance, but their impact on the gut microbiota is also of tremendous interest. In vitro gut models are important tools to study such complex drug–microbiota interactions in humans.

Methods

The MiniBioReactor Array (MBRA) in vitro microbiota system; a single-stage continuous flow culture model, hosted in an anaerobic chamber; was used to evaluate the impact of three concentrations of a third-generation cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) on faecal microbiota from two healthy donors (treatment versus control: three replicates per condition). We conducted 16S microbiome profiling and analysed microbial richness, diversity and taxonomic changes. β-Lactamase activities were evaluated and correlated with the effects observed in the MBRA in vitro system.

Results

The MBRA preserved each donor’s specificities, and differences between the donors were maintained through time. Before treatment, all faecal cultures belonging to the same donor were comparable in composition, richness, and diversity. Treatment with ceftriaxone was associated with a decrease in α-diversity, and an increase in β-diversity index, in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximum effect on diversity was observed after 72 h of treatment. Importantly, one donor had a stronger microbiota β-lactamase activity that was associated with a reduced impact of ceftriaxone on microbiota composition.

Conclusions

MBRA can reliably mimic the intestinal microbiota and its modifications under antibiotic selective pressure. The impact of the treatment was donor- and concentration-dependent. We hypothesize these results could be explained, at least in part, by the differences in β-lactamase activity of the microbiota itself. Our results support the relevance and promise of the MBRA system to study drug–microbiota interactions.

The interplay between anticancer challenges and the microbial communities from the gut

Cancer being an increasing burden on human health, the use of anticancer drugs has risen over the last decades. The physiological effects of these drugs are not only perceived by the host's cells but also by the microbial cells it harbors as commensals, notably the gut microbiota. Since the early '50 s, the cytotoxicity of anticancer chemotherapy was evaluated on bacteria revealing some antimicrobial activities that result in an established perturbation of the gut microbiota. This perturbation can affect the host's health through dysbiosis, which can lead to multiple complications, but has also been shown to have a direct effect on the treatment efficiency.We, therefore, conducted a review of literature focusing on this triangular relationship involving the microbial communities from the gut, the host's disease, and the anticancer treatment. We focused specifically on the antimicrobial effects of anticancer chemotherapy, their impact on mutagenesis in bacteria, and the perspectives of using bacteria-based tools to help in the diagnostic and treatment of cancer.

Murine Model for Measuring Effects of Humanized-Dosing of Antibiotics on the Gut Microbiome

There is a current need for enhancing our insight in the effects of antimicrobial treatment on the composition of human microbiota. Also, the spontaneous restoration of the microbiota after antimicrobial treatment requires better understanding. This is best addressed in well-defined animal models. We here present a model in which immune-competent or neutropenic mice were administered piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) according to human treatment schedules. Before, during and after the TZP treatment, fecal specimens were longitudinally collected at established intervals over several weeks. Gut microbial taxonomic distribution and abundance were assessed through culture and molecular means during all periods. Non-targeted metabolomics analyses of stool samples using Quadrupole Time of Flight mass spectrometry (QTOF MS) were also applied to determine if a metabolic fingerprint correlated with antibiotic use, immune status, and microbial abundance. TZP treatment led to a 5–10-fold decrease in bacterial fecal viability counts which were not fully restored during post-antibiotic follow up. Two distinct, relatively uniform and reproducible restoration scenarios of microbiota changes were seen in post TZP-treatment mice. Post-antibiotic flora could consist of predominantly Firmicutes or, alternatively, a more diverse mix of taxa. In general, the pre-treatment microbial communities were not fully restored within the screening periods applied. A new species, closely related to Eubacterium siraeum, Mageeibacillus indolicus, and Saccharofermentans acetigenes, became predominant post-treatment in a significant proportion of mice, identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Principal component analysis of QTOF MS of mouse feces successfully distinguished treated from non-treated mice as well as immunocompetent from neutropenic mice. We observe dynamic but distinct and reproducible responses in the mouse gut microbiota during and after TZP treatment and propose the current murine model as a useful tool for defining the more general post-antibiotic effects in the gastro-intestinal ecosystem where humanized antibiotic dosing may ultimately facilitate extrapolation to humans.

Safety Profile of Ceftazidime-Avibactam: Pooled Data from the Adult Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trial Programme

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam combines the established anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin, ceftazidime, with the novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, avibactam.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in adults using pooled data from two phase II (NCT00690378, NCT00752219) and five phase III (NCT01499290, NCT01726023, NCT01644643, NCT01808093 and NCT01595438/NCT01599806) clinical studies.

METHODS

Safety data from seven multicentre, randomised, active-comparator studies were pooled by study group at the patient level for descriptive analyses, comprising patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including pyelonephritis, complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), or nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), treated with ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole or comparator.

RESULTS

In total, 4050 patients (ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole, n = 2024; comparator, n = 2026) were included in the pooled analysis. Adverse events (AEs) up to the last study visit occurred in 996 (49.2%) and 965 (47.6%) patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and comparator, respectively. The most common AEs across treatment groups were diarrhoea, nausea, headache, vomiting and pyrexia. There were few discontinuations due to AEs (2.5% and 1.7% for ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and comparators, respectively). Overall rates of serious AEs were 8.7% for ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and 7.2% for comparators; respective rates of AEs with an outcome of death were 2.0% and 1.8%. AEs considered causally related to the study drug or procedures occurred in 10.7% and 9.6% of patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole and comparators; the most common drug-related AEs in both groups were diarrhoea, headache, nausea and increased alanine aminotransferase. No impact to the safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam ± metronidazole was found with regard to intrinsic factors, such as age or renal function at baseline, or extrinsic factors, such as geographical origin. Potentially clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters were infrequent with no trends or safety concerns identified.

CONCLUSION

The observed safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam across infection types is consistent with the established safety profile of ceftazidime monotherapy and no new safety findings were identified. This analysis supports the use of ceftazidime-avibactam as a treatment option in adults with cUTI, cIAI and NP, including VAP.

Completing the Picture-Capturing the Resistome in Antibiotic Clinical Trials

Despite the accepted dogma that antibiotic use is the largest contributor to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and human microbiome disruption, our knowledge of specific antibiotic-microbiome effects remains basic. Detection of associations between new or old antimicrobials and specific AMR burden is patchy and heterogeneous. Various microbiome analysis tools are available to determine antibiotic effects on microbial communities in vivo. Microbiome analysis of treatment groups in antibiotic clinical trials, powered to measure clinically meaningful endpoints would greatly assist the antibiotic development pipeline and clinician antibiotic decision making.

Antibiotic Followed by a Potential Probiotic Increases Brown Adipose Tissue, Reduces Biometric Measurements, and Changes Intestinal Microbiota Phyla in Obesity

The development of adjuvant therapies for obesity treatment is justified by the high prevalence of this disease worldwide, and the relationship between obesity and intestinal microbiota is a promising target for obesity treatment. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the adjuvant treatment of obesity through the use of potential probiotics and antibiotics, either separately or sequentially. In the first phase of the experiment, animals had diet-induced obesity with consumption of a high saturated fat diet and a fructose solution. After this period, there was a reduction in caloric supply, that is the conventional treatment of obesity, and the animals were divided into 5 experimental groups: control group (G1), obese group (G2), potential probiotic group (G3), antibiotic group (G4), and antibiotic followed by potential probiotic group (G5). The adjuvant treatments lasted 4 weeks and were administered daily, via gavage: Animals in G1 and G2 received distilled water, the G3 obtained Lactobacillus gasseri LG-G12, and the G4 received ceftriaxone. The G5 received ceftriaxone for 2 weeks, followed by the offer of Lactobacillus gasseri LG-G12 for another 2 weeks. Parameters related to obesity, such as biometric measurements, food consumption, biochemical tests, histological assessments, short-chain fatty acids concentration, and composition of the intestinal microbiota, were analyzed. The treatment with caloric restriction and sequential supply of antibiotics and potential probiotics was able to reduce biometric measures, increase brown adipose tissue, and alter the intestinal microbiota phyla, standing out as a promising treatment for obesity.

Impact of antimicrobial therapy on the gut microbiome

The gut microbiome is now considered an organ unto itself and plays an important role in health maintenance and recovery from critical illness. The commensal organisms responsible for the framework of the gut microbiome are valuable in protection against disease and various physiological tasks. Critical illness and the associated interventions have a detrimental impact on the microbiome. While antimicrobials are one of the fundamental and often life-saving modalities in septic patients, they can also pave the way for subsequent harm because of the resulting damage to the gut microbiome. Contributing to many of the non-specific signs and symptoms of sepsis, the balance between the overuse of antimicrobials and the clinical need in these situations is often difficult to delineate. Given the potency of antimicrobials utilized to treat septic patients, the effects on the gut microbiome are often rapid and long-lasting, in which case full recovery may never be observed. The overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens is of significant concern as they can lead to infections that become increasingly difficult to treat. Continued research to understand the disturbances within the gut microbiome of critically ill patients and their outcomes is essential to help develop future therapies to circumvent damage to, or restore, the microbiome. In this review, we discuss the impact of the antimicrobials often used for the treatment of sepsis on the gut microbiota.

The effect of antibiotics on the composition of the intestinal microbiota - a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Antibiotics change the composition of the intestinal microbiota. The magnitude of the effect of antibiotics on the microbiota and whether the effects are short-term or persist long-term remain uncertain. In this review, we summarise studies that have investigated the effect of antibiotics on the composition of the human intestinal microbiota.

METHODS

A systematic search was done to identify original studies that have investigated the effect of systemic antibiotics on the intestinal microbiota in humans.

RESULTS

We identified 129 studies investigating 2076 participants and 301 controls. Many studies reported a decrease in bacterial diversity with antibiotic treatment. Penicillin only had minor effects on the intestinal microbiota. Amoxicillin, amoxcillin/clavulanate, cephalosporins, lipopolyglycopeptides, macrolides, ketolides, clindamycin, tigecycline, quinolones and fosfomycin all increased abundance of Enterobacteriaea other than E. coli (mainly Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella spp.). Amoxcillin, cephalosporins, macrolides, clindamycin, quinolones and sulphonamides decreased abundance of E. coli, while amoxcillin/clavulante, in contrast to other penicillins, increased abundance of E. coli. Amoxicllin, piperacillin and ticarcillin, cephalosporins (except fifth generation cephalosporins), carbapenems and lipoglycopeptides were associated with increased abundance of Enterococcus spp., while macrolides and doxycycline decreased its abundance. Piperacillin and ticarcillin, carbapenems, macrolides, clindamycin and quinolones strongly decreased the abundance of anaerobic bacteria. In the studies that investigated persistence, the longest duration of changes was reported after treatment with ciprofloxacin (one year), clindamycin (two years) and clarithromycin plus metronidazole (four years). Many antibiotics were associated with a decrease in butyrate or butryrate-producing bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotics have profound and sometimes persisting effects on the intestinal microbiota, characterised by diminished abundance of beneficial commensals and increased abundance of potentially detrimental microorganisms. Understanding these effects will help tailor antibiotic treatment and the use of probiotics to minimise this 'collateral damage'.

Extended Versus Narrow-spectrum Antibiotics in the Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: A Propensity-matched Comparative Effectiveness Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of extended versus narrow spectrum antibiotics in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) and hospital revisits in children with uncomplicated appendicitis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is a paucity of high-quality evidence in the pediatric literature comparing the effectiveness of extended versus narrow-spectrum antibiotics in the prevention of SSIs associated with uncomplicated appendicitis.

METHODS

Clinical data from the ACS NSQIP-Pediatric Appendectomy Pilot Project were merged with antibiotic utilization data from the Pediatric Health Information System database for patients undergoing appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis at 17 hospitals from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015. Patients who received piperacillin/tazobactam (extended spectrum) were compared with those who received either cefoxitin or ceftriaxone with metronidazole (narrow spectrum) after propensity matching on demographic and severity characteristics. Study outcomes were 30-day SSI and hospital revisit rates.

RESULTS

Of the 1389 patients included, 39.1% received piperacillin/tazobactam (range by hospital: 0% to 100%), and the remainder received narrow-spectrum agents. No differences in demographics or severity characteristics were found between groups following matching. In the matched analysis, the rates of SSI were similar between groups [extended spectrum: 2.4% vs narrow spectrum 1.8% (odds ratio, OR: 1.05, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.34-3.26)], as was the rate of revisits [extended spectrum: 7.9% vs narrow spectrum 5.1% (OR: 1.46, 95% CI 0.75-2.87)].

CONCLUSIONS

Use of extended-spectrum antibiotics was not associated with lower rates of SSI or hospital revisits when compared with narrow-spectrum antibiotics in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. Our results challenge the routine use of extended-spectrum antibiotics observed at many hospitals, particularly given the increasing incidence of antibiotic-resistant organisms.

Carbapenems and alternative β-lactams for the treatment of infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: What impact on intestinal colonisation resistance?

The ongoing pandemic of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is responsible for a global rise in carbapenem consumption that may hasten the dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). Hence, carbapenem sparing through the use of alternative β-lactams is increasingly considered as a potential option in patients with ESBL-E infections. However, at the individual level, this strategy implies an in-depth understanding of how carbapenems and their alternatives impair the gut microbiota, especially the anaerobic bacteria and the colonisation resistance (CR) that it confers. In this review, we sought to appraise the impact of carbapenems and their main alternatives for ESBL-E infections (namely β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, cephamycins and temocillin) on the gut ecosystem and the resulting hazard for acquisition of CPE. Although limited, the available evidence challenges our perception of the ecological side effects of these antimicrobials and highlights knowledge gaps regarding antibiotic-induced alterations in intestinal CR. These alterations may depend not only on anti-anaerobic properties but also on a panel of parameters with marked interindividual variability, such as baseline characteristics of the gut microbiota or the degree of biliary excretion for the considered drug. In the current context of ESBL-E dissemination and increasing opportunities for carbapenem-sparing initiatives, large, comparative, high-quality studies based on new-generation sequencing tools are more than ever warranted to better define the positioning of alternative β-lactams in antimicrobial stewardship programmes.

Pharmacological aspects and spectrum of action of ceftazidime-avibactam: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Ceftazidime-avibactam is an antimicrobial association active against several Enterobacteriaceae species, including those resistant to carbapenem. Considering the importance of this drug in the current panorama of multidrug-resistant bacteria, we performed a systematic review about ceftazidime-avibactam with emphasis on clinical and pharmacological published data.

METHODS

A systematic search of the medical literature was performed. The databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science (until September 2017). The search terms used were 'avibactam', 'NXL104' and 'AVE1330A'. Bibliographies from those studies were also reviewed. Ceftazidime was not included as a search term, once relevant studies about avibactam in association with other drugs could be excluded. Only articles in English were selected. No statistical analysis or quality validation was included in this review.

RESULTS

A total of 151 manuscripts were included. Ceftazidime-avibactam has limited action against anaerobic bacteria. Avibactam is a potent inhibitor of class A, class C, and some class D enzymes, which includes KPC-2. The best pharmacodynamic profile of ceftazidime-avibactam is ƒT > MIC, validated in an animal model of soft tissue infection. Three clinical trials showed the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in patients with intra-abdominal and urinary infections. Ceftazidime-avibactam has been evaluated versus meropenem/doripenem in hospitalized adults with nosocomial pneumonia, neutropenic patients and pediatric patients.

CONCLUSION

Ceftazidime-avibactam has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile for severe infections and highly active against carbapenemases of KPC-2 type.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam as Salvage Therapy for Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a recently approved β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination with the potential to treat serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms. Few patients with such infections were included in the CAZ-AVI clinical trials, and clinical experience is lacking. We present a case series of patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPa) who were treated with CAZ-AVI salvage therapy on a compassionate-use basis. Physicians who had prescribed CAZ-AVI completed a case report form. We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher's exact test to compare patients by treatment outcome. The sample included 36 patients infected with CRE and two with CRPa. The most common infections were intra-abdominal. Physicians categorized 60.5% of patients as having life-threatening infections. All but two patients received other antibiotics before CAZ-AVI, for a median of 13 days. The median duration of CAZ-AVI treatment was 16 days. Twenty-five patients (65.8%) concurrently received other antibiotics to which their pathogen was nonresistant in vitro Twenty-eight patients (73.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 56.9 to 86.6%) experienced clinical and/or microbiological cure. Five patients (20.8%) with documented microbiological cure died, whereas 10 patients (71.4%) with no documented microbiological cure died (P = 0.01). In three-quarters of cases, CAZ-AVI (alone or combined with other antibiotics) cured infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms, 95% of which had failed previous therapy. Microbiological cure was associated with improved survival. CAZ-AVI shows promising clinical results for infections for which treatment options are limited.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CTZ-AVI) as a treatment for hospitalized adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections

Avibactam, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, has recently been co-formulated with ceftazidime and approved for use in patients with complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections, where no better treatment alternative exists. The basis for its FDA approval has been the extensive clinical experience with ceftazidime and the demonstration in vitro and in animal models that the addition of avibactam reverses resistance to ceftazidime in extended-spectrum β-lactamase and some carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Early clinical data are promising, with efficacy demonstrated in patients with complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections. This review will summarize the in vitro, animal and clinical data available on this agent to date.

[Effect of β-lactamase detection on reducing the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children with severe bacterial pneumonia]

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of β-lactamase (BLs) detection and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) on the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in children with severe bacterial pneumonia.

METHODS

The clinical data of the children with bacterial severe pneumonia were retrospectively studied. Of all the patients, 248 using amoxicillin/clavulanate but without BLs detection and 323 using amoxicillin (BLs negative) or amoxicillin/clavulanate (BLs positive) were used as the amoxicillin group; 208 patients using piperacillin/tazobactam but without BLs detection and 291 patients using piperacillin (BLs negative) or piperacillin/tazobactam (BLs positive) were used as the piperacillin group; and 191 patients using cefoperazone/sulbactam but without BLs detection and 341 patients using cefoperazone (BLs negative) or cefoperazone/sulbactam (BLs positive) were used as the cefoperazone group. The incidence and clinical symptoms of AAD between the undetected and detected BLs patients were compared.

RESULTS

The incidences of AAD in the amoxicillin, piperacillin and cefoperazone groups without BLs detection groups were significantly higher than those in the corresponding groups with negative or positive results of BLs detection (P<0.01). The durations of diarrhea, antibiotic use and hospitalization stay in AAD patients receiving BLs detection were shorter than in those without receiving BLs detection (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

It is very important to detect BLs for reducing the incidence and relieving symptoms of AAD in children with severe bacterial pneumonia.

Role of cephalosporins in the era of Clostridium difficile infection

The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Europe has increased markedly since 2000. Previous meta-analyses have suggested a strong association between cephalosporin use and CDI, and many national programmes on CDI control have focused on reducing cephalosporin usage. Despite reductions in cephalosporin use, however, rates of CDI have continued to rise. This review examines the potential association of CDI with cephalosporins, and considers other factors that influence CDI risk. EUCLID (the EUropean, multicentre, prospective biannual point prevalence study of CLostridium difficile Infection in hospitalized patients with Diarrhoea) reported an increase in the annual incidence of CDI from 6.6 to 7.3 cases per 10 000 patient bed-days from 2011-12 to 2012-13, respectively. While CDI incidence and cephalosporin usage varied widely across countries studied, there was no clear association between overall cephalosporin prescribing (or the use of any particular cephalosporin) and CDI incidence. Moreover, variations in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of cephalosporins of the same generation make categorization by generation insufficient for predicting impact on gut microbiota. A multitude of additional factors can affect the risk of CDI. Antibiotic choice is an important consideration; however, CDI risk is associated with a range of antibiotic classes. Prescription of multiple antibiotics and a long duration of treatment are key risk factors for CDI, and risk also differs across patient populations. We propose that all of these are factors that should be taken into account when selecting an antibiotic, rather than focusing on the exclusion of individual drug classes.

Partial recovery of microbiomes after antibiotic treatment

Antibiotics profoundly affect the gut microbiome and modulate microbial communities. We recently observed that antimicrobial drugs also impact the abundance and distribution of antibiotic resistance genes. In this addendum, we reanalyze our ∼1 trillion nucleotide shotgun metagenomic dataset to quantify comprehensive genomic differences at the sequence level before and after antibiotic treatment. We show that 7 day exposure to cefprozil leads to a statistically significant loss of metagenome sequences. Recovery of gut microbiomes 3 months after antibiotherapy was characterized by the emergence of new genome sequences not observed prior to antibiotic exposure. Participants with low initial gut microbiome diversity had an increased amount of sequences related to antibiotic resistance. Therefore, we suggest that while the taxonomical composition of microbiomes is partially affected by the antibiotic, the genomic content and population structure of bacterial communities is noticeably impacted.

New drugs for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in the era of increasing antimicrobial resistance

The continuing increase in multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) worldwide has created new challenges in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). A number of novel antimicrobial agents have been developed against resistant pathogens. To target extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing pathogens, novel β-lactam antibiotics, such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and S-649266, are antimicrobial alternatives for cIAIs. Two new drugs, eravacycline and plazomicin, have activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and ESBL-producers. New lipoglycopeptides and oxazolidinones provide feasible options against resistant Gram-positive pathogens. These novel antimicrobials may play a role in improving the clinical outcomes of cIAIs caused by MDROs.

Ecological Effect of Ceftaroline-Avibactam on the Normal Human Intestinal Microbiota

Ceftaroline-avibactam is a new combination of the antibiotic ceftaroline with a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, avibactam. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of ceftaroline-avibactam on the human intestinal microbiota. Fourteen healthy volunteers received ceftaroline-avibactam (600 mg ceftaroline fosamil and 600 mg avibactam) intravenously over 2 h every 8 h on days 1 to 6 and as a single dose on day 7. Fecal samples were collected on day -1 (within 24 h of the first infusion on day 1) and on days 2, 5, 7, 9, 14, and 21. Escherichia coli numbers decreased during the study and normalized on day 21. An increased number of Klebsiella bacteria appeared on day 14 and normalized on day 21. The number of other enterobacteria decreased during the study, and the number of enterococci decreased from days 2 to 7 and normalized on day 9. Candida numbers increased from days 5 to 9 and normalized after day 14. The number of lactobacilli decreased during the study and recovered on day 14. The number of bifidobacteria decreased on day 2 and normalized on day 21. The number of Bacteroides bacteria was unchanged. Clostridium difficile numbers decreased on days 7 and 9 and increased on days 14 and 21. A toxigenic C. difficile strain was detected in one volunteer on day 21 with no reported adverse events. Plasma samples were collected on days -1, 2, 5, and 7. Ceftaroline and avibactam concentrations were 0 to 34.5 mg/liter and 0 to 61.6 mg/liter, respectively, in plasma and 0 to 35.4 mg/kg and 0 to 98.5 mg/kg, respectively, in feces. (This study is registered in the European Clinical Trials Database [https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/] under number EudraCT 2012 004921-25.).