Moxifloxacin plus rifampin as an alternative for levofloxacin plus rifampin in the treatment of a prosthetic joint infection with Staphylococcus aureus

Oral Antibiotics for Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Bacteremia and endocarditis are two clinical syndromes that, for decades, were managed exclusively with parenteral antimicrobials, irrespective of a given patient's clinical condition, causative pathogen, or its antibiotic susceptibility profile. This clinical approach, however, was based on low-quality data and outdated expert opinions. When a patient's condition has improved, gastrointestinal absorption is not compromised, and an oral antibiotic regimen reaching adequate serum concentrations is available, a switch to oral antibacterials can be applied. Although available evidence has reduced the timing of the oral switch in bacteremia to three days/until clinical improvement, there are only scarce data regarding less than 10-day intravenous antibiotic therapy in endocarditis. Many standard or studied oral antimicrobial dosages are smaller than the approved doses for parenteral administration, which is a risk factor for treatment failure; in addition, the gastrointestinal barrier may affect drug bioavailability, especially when the causative pathogen has a minimum inhibitory concentration that is close to the susceptibility breakpoint. A considerable number of patients infected by such near-breakpoint strains may not be potential candidates for oral step-down therapy to non-highly bioavailable antibiotics like beta-lactams; different breakpoints should be determined for this setting. This review will focus on summarizing findings about pathogen-specific tailoring of oral step-down therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis, but will also present laboratory and clinical data about antibiotics such as beta-lactams, linezolid, and fosfomycin that should be studied more in order to elucidate their role and optimal dosage in this context.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for optimizing antimicrobial therapy used to treat bone and joint infections: an evidence-based algorithmic approach

INTRODUCTION

Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are a major health concern causing remarkable morbidity and mortality. However, which antimicrobial treatment could be the best according to specific clinical scenarios and/or to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) features remains an unmet clinical need. This multidisciplinary opinion article aims to develop evidence-based algorithms for empirical and targeted antibiotic therapy of patients affected by BJIs.

AREAS COVERED

A multidisciplinary team of four experts had several rounds of assessment for developing algorithms devoted to empirical and targeted antimicrobial therapy of BJIs. A literature search was performed on PubMed-MEDLINE (until April 2023) to provide evidence for supporting therapeutic choices. Four different clinical scenarios were structured according to specific infection types (i.e. vertebral osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, infected non-unions and other chronic osteomyelitis, and infectious arthritis), need or not of surgical intervention or revision, isolation or not of clinically relevant bacterial pathogens from blood and/or tissue cultures, and PK/PD features of antibiotics.

EXPERT OPINION

The proposed therapeutic algorithms were based on a multifaceted approach considering the peculiar features of each antibiotic (spectrum of activity, PK/PD properties, bone penetration rate, and anti-biofilm activity), and could be hopefully helpful in improving clinical outcome of BJIs.

Rifampicin in periprosthetic joint infections: where do we stand and where are we headed?

INTRODUCTION

A periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication of arthroplasty. Treatment of PJI consists of surgical debridement with or without the exchange of the implant and long-term antimicrobial treatment. Rifampicin is regarded as one of the cornerstones of antimicrobial treatment for staphylococcal PJI, but the exact role of rifampicin for PJI in different clinical scenarios remains to be elucidated.

AREAS COVERED

In this perspective article, an overview is provided of in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies that were the basis of the current guidelines and recommendations for rifampicin use in daily practice for PJI. Controversial issues on indication, dosing, timing, duration and antibiotic drug interactions will be addressed. Finally, the most urgent clinical questions on rifampicin use that need answering in the nearby future will be formulated.

EXPERT OPINION

Many inquiries remain concerning the exact indications and clinical use of rifampicin in PJI. Randomized controlled trials are needed to answer these questions.

Comparing the Synergistic and Antagonistic Interactions of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin Combined with Rifampin against Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Time-Kill Assay

BACKGROUND

Treatment of device-related infections by drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus can be challenging, and combination therapy has been proposed as a potential solution. We compared the effectiveness of levofloxacin-rifampin and ciprofloxacin-rifampin combinations in killing methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) using a time-kill assay.

METHODS

We randomly selected 15 vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA) strains, 3 vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strains, and 12 heterogeneous VISA (hVISA) strains from the Asian Bacterial Bank. Time-kill experiments were performed in duplicate for each isolate. Viable bacterial counts were determined at 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h for the ciprofloxacin- and levofloxacin-rifampin combinations at 1× MIC and 0.5× MIC. We compared synergistic and antagonistic interactions between the two combinations.

RESULTS

The viable bacterial count significantly decreased after 24 h of exposure to ciprofloxacin-rifampin and levofloxacin-rifampin combinations, with synergy observed more frequently in isolates exposed to ciprofloxacin-rifampin (43.3%) than levofloxacin-rifampin (20.0%) (p = 0.0082). The synergistic interactions of both combinations were more frequently observed in resistant strains with high MICs of ciprofloxacin (≥16 mg/L) and levofloxacin (≥8 mg/L). Levofloxacin tended to exhibit more frequent antagonistic interactions with rifampin than ciprofloxacin, although there was no statistical difference in antagonism between the two combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that ciprofloxacin exhibits superior synergistic activity against MRSA strains, including VISA/hVISA, when combined with rifampin compared with levofloxacin. High MICs of fluoroquinolones were found to predict synergism. Our results suggest that ciprofloxacin may be a more effective choice than levofloxacin for combination therapy with rifampin in the treatment of MRSA infections.

Antimicrobial treatment of patients with a periprosthetic joint infection: basic principles

The antibiotic treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is complicated by the presence of biofilm produced by bacteria on the abiotic surface of the implant. Bacteria within the deeper layers of the biofilm become metabolically less active, resulting in antibiotic tolerance due to several mechanisms. This review describes the basic principles of antibiotic treatment in PJI in relation to the behavior of bacteria within the biofilm. The concept of biofilm-active antibiotics will be explained from an in vitro as well as in vivo perspective. Evidence from clinical studies on biofilm-active antibiotics in PJI will be highlighted, mainly focusing on the role of rifampicin for Gram-positive microorganisms and fluoroquinolones for Gram-negative microorganisms. The optimal treatment duration will be discussed as the timing of switching to oral antibiotic therapy.

The Use of Rifampin in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Rifampin is an antibiotic with the ability to penetrate bacterial biofilms, and thus has been considered as a potentially important adjunct in the prevention and treatment of PJI. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate and summarize the use of rifampin in TJA, particularly in the context of PJI.

METHODS

A literature search of all relevant electronic databases was performed. All comparative studies assessing the use of rifampin in the context of TJA were included. Descriptive data are reported, and a meta-analysis was performed using all studies which compared the addition of rifampin to standard care in treating PJI.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies met inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of 22 studies comparing the addition of rifampin to standard care for treating PJI found a significant reduction in failure rates (26.0% vs 35.9%; odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.86). The protective effect of rifampin was maintained in studies which included exchange arthroplasty as a treatment strategy, but not in studies only using an implant retention strategy. Among studies reporting adverse events of rifampin, there was a 20.5% adverse event rate.

CONCLUSION

Overall, rifampin appears to confer a protective effect against treatment failure following PJI. This treatment effect is particularly pronounced in the context of exchange arthroplasty. Further high-level evidence is needed to clarify the exact indications and doses of rifampin which can most effectively act as an adjunct in the treatment of PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Level I-III Studies.

Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Staphylococcal Infections: A Critical Reappraisal of Unmet Clinical Needs Associated with the Implementation of the Best Antibiotic Choice

Infections associated with orthopaedic implants represent a major health concern characterized by a remarkable incidence of morbidity and mortality. The wide variety of clinical scenarios encountered in the heterogeneous world of infections associated with orthopaedic implants makes the implementation of an optimal and standardized antimicrobial treatment challenging. Antibiotic bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and drug choice/dosage regimens favouring outpatient management (i.e., long-acting or oral agents) play a major role in regards to the chronic evolution of these infections. The aim of this multidisciplinary opinion article is to summarize evidence supporting the use of the different anti-staphylococcal agents in terms of microbiological and pharmacological optimization according to bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and feasibility for outpatient regimens, and to provide a useful guide for clinicians in the management of patients affected by staphylococcal infections associated with orthopaedic implants Novel long-acting lipoglycopeptides, and particularly dalbavancin, alone or in combination with rifampicin, could represent the best antibiotic choice according to real-world evidence and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. The implementation of a multidisciplinary taskforce and close cooperation between microbiologists and clinicians is crucial for providing the best care in this scenario.

Phage Activity against Planktonic and Biofilm Staphylococcus aureus Periprosthetic Joint Infection Isolates

We recently reported the successful treatment of a case of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with phage. Phage activity against bacteria causing PJI has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we examined the in vitro activity of seven phages against 122 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus recovered between April 1999 and February 2018 from subjects with PJI. Phages were assessed against planktonic and biofilm phenotypes. Activity of individual phages was demonstrated against up to 73% of bacterial isolates in the planktonic state and up to 100% of biofilms formed by isolates that were planktonically phage susceptible. Susceptibility to phage was not correlated with small-colony-variant phenotype for planktonic or biofilm bacteria; correlation between antibiotic susceptibility and planktonic phage susceptibility and between biofilm phage susceptibility and strength of biofilm formation were noted under select conditions. These results demonstrate that phages can infect S. aureus causing PJI in both planktonic and biofilm phenotypes, and thus are worthy of investigation as an alternative or addition to antibiotics in this setting.

Moxifloxacin Concentrations in the Knee Joint, Tibial Bone, and Soft Tissue When Combined with Rifampicin: A Randomized Porcine Microdialysis Study

BACKGROUND

Peri and postoperative antibiotics are key adjuvant treatment tools in the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of rifampicin on the area under the moxifloxacin concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) in the synovial fluid of the knee joint, tibial bone, and adjacent subcutaneous tissue under steady-state conditions using microdialysis in a porcine model.

METHODS

Twenty female pigs were randomized to receive oral treatment with moxifloxacin monotherapy (Group A, n = 10) of 400 mg once daily for 3 days or a combination therapy (Group B, n = 10) of 400 mg of moxifloxacin once daily for 3 days and 450 mg of rifampicin twice daily for 7 days. Microdialysis was used for sampling the synovial fluid of the knee joint, tibial cancellous and cortical bone, and adjacent subcutaneous tissues. Plasma samples were taken as a reference. Measurements were obtained for 24 hours.

RESULTS

Coadministration of moxifloxacin and rifampicin resulted in reductions of the moxifloxacin AUC0-24 in all targeted tissue compartments by 67% to 85% (p < 0.05). The corresponding change in plasma was 20% (p = 0.49). For both groups, the tissue penetration (the ratio of tissue free fraction AUC0-24 to plasma free fraction AUC0-24 [fAUCtissue/fAUCplasma]) was incomplete in all investigated compartments. The highest moxifloxacin tissue penetration was in the knee joint synovial fluid: 0.59 (Group A) and 0.24 (Group B). The lowest tissue penetration was in the cortical bone: 0.17 (Group A) and 0.03 (Group B).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant reduction of the moxifloxacin concentration, expressed as the AUC0-24, in tissues relevant to acute PJI treatment when coadministered with rifampicin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The concentrations within the targeted tissue compartments were reduced significantly more than the concentrations in plasma, which may be particularly important as plasma concentrations are used in clinical practice to assess moxifloxacin treatment sufficiency.

If, when, and how to use rifampin in acute staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections, a multicentre observational study

Background

Rifampin is generally advised in the treatment of acute staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, if, when, and how to use rifampin remains a matter of debate. We evaluated the outcome of patients treated with and without rifampin, and analyzed the influence of timing, dose and co-antibiotic.

Methods

Acute staphylococcal PJIs treated with surgical debridement between 1999 and 2017, and a minimal follow-up of 1 year were evaluated. Treatment failure was defined as the need for any further surgical procedure related to infection, PJI-related death or the need for suppressive antimicrobial treatment.

Results

A total of 669 patients were analyzed. Treatment failure was 32.2% (131/407) in patients treated with rifampin and 54.2% (142/262) in whom rifampin was withheld (P < .001). The most prominent effect of rifampin was observed in knees (treatment failure 28.6% versus 63.9%, respectively, P < .001). The use of rifampin was an independent predictor of treatment success in the multi-variate analysis (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20 – 0.45). In the rifampin group, the use of a co-antibiotic other than a fluoroquinolone or clindamycin (OR 10.1, 95% CI 5.65 – 18.2) and the start of rifampin within 5 days after surgical debridement (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.08 – 3.65) were predictors of treatment failure. The dosing of rifampin had no effect on outcome.

Conclusions

Our data supports the use of rifampin in acute staphylococcal PJIs treated with surgical debridement, particularly in knees. Immediate start of rifampin after surgical debridement should probably be discouraged, but requires further investigation.

Resistance Profiles and Biological Characteristics of Rifampicin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Small-Colony Variants

Background

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major contributor to nosocomial and community-acquired infections. S. aureus small colony variants (SCVs) which changed in relevant phenotype have made more limited and difficult for therapeutic options against S. aureus infections increasingly. Rifampicin is considered as the "last-resort" antibiotic against S. aureus. Our study investigated resistance profiles and biological characteristics of rifampicin-resistant S. aureus SCVs.

Methods

We collected S. aureus SCVs that were selected from 41 rifampicin-resistant clinical isolates. Then, biological characteristics, resistance spectrum, and rifampicin resistance mechanisms of tested S. aureus SCVs and corresponding parental strains were investigated by classic microbiological methods, agar dilution method, polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Moreover, the fitness cost of S. aureus SCVs, including growth, biofilm formation ability, and virulence profile, was also determined by bacterial growth curve assay, biofilm formation assay, and Galleria mellonella infection model.

Results

There were three S. aureus SCVs (JP310 SCVs, JP1450 SCVs, JP1486 SCVs) that were selected from 41 rifampicin-resistant S. aureus. S. aureus SCVs colonies were tiny, with decreased pigmentation, and the hemolysis circle was not obvious compared with corresponding parental strains. And SCVs could not be restored to normal-colony phenotype after hemin, menaquinone, or thymidine supplementation. Different rpoB mutations occurred in JP1486 SCVs. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed MICs of SCVs were higher than corresponding parental strains. Besides, the growth ability and virulence of SCVs were lower, and biofilm formation ability of which increased compared with parental strains.

Conclusion

S. aureus SCVs share the rifampicin resistance mechanisms with parental strains, although there were some differences in the position of rpoB mutations. Moreover, we found that the biological characteristics of SCVs were significantly different from corresponding parental strains. In contrast, decreased susceptibility to other antibiotics of SCVs was observed during phenotype switch. Furthermore, SCVs incur the fitness cost.

Recommendations for Systemic Antimicrobial Therapy in Fracture-Related Infection: A Consensus From an International Expert Group

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a major complication in musculoskeletal trauma and one of the leading causes of morbidity. Standardization of general treatment strategies for FRI has been poor. One of the reasons is the heterogeneity in this patient population, including various anatomical locations, multiple fracture patterns, different degrees of soft-tissue injury, and different patient conditions. This variability makes treatment complex and hard to standardize. As these infections are biofilm-related, surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment, and this entails multiple key aspects (eg, fracture fixation, tissue sampling, debridement, and soft-tissue management). Another important aspect, which is sometimes less familiar to the orthopaedic trauma surgeon, is systemic antimicrobial therapy. The aim of this article is to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for systemic antimicrobial therapy with respect to FRI, based on the most recent literature combined with expert opinion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Moxifloxacin-rifampicin combination for the treatment of non-staphylococcal Gram-positive orthopedic implant-related infections

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of the moxifloxacin-rifampicin combination in non-staphylococcal Gram-positive orthopedic implant-related infections.

METHODS

Patients treated with the moxifloxacin-rifampicin combination for an implant-related infection from November 2014 to November 2016 were retrospectively identified from the database of the referral centers for bone and joint infections in Western France.

RESULTS

Twenty-three cases of infection due to Streptococcus spp. (n=12), Cutibacteriumacnes (n=6), and Enterococcus faecalis (n=5) were included. Ten patients with hip prosthesis were included. Infection was polymicrobial in 11 cases. According to the MIC, moxifloxacin was 1.5 to 11.7 times as active as levofloxacin against non-staphylococcal Gram-positive bacteria. We reported an 81.8% success rate, and no severe adverse effect.

CONCLUSION

The moxifloxacin-rifampicin combination is a valuable alternative for the treatment of non-staphylococcal Gram-positive implant-related infections because of the good activity of moxifloxacin against these bacteria and the potential activity on the biofilm.

Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro, in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections

Rifampin has been used as an agent in combination therapy in orthopedic device-related infections (ODRI) for almost three decades. The aim of this review is to provide data regarding the role of rifampin against biofilm infection in vitro, in animal models, and in clinical ODRI. Available data are gathered in order to present the rational use of rifampin combinations in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The role of rifampin is well defined in patients with PJI and is indicated in those who fulfill the Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria for debridement and implant retention or one-stage exchange. It should be used with care because of the danger of rapid emergence of resistance. Potential drug interactions should be considered.