In-vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae isolates recovered from hospitalized patients in Germany

Antibiotic Resistances of Enterobacteriaceae with Chromosomal Ampc in Urine Cultures: Review and Experience of a Spanish Hospital

The Enterobacteriaceae Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella aerogenes, Morganella morganii, Providencia stuartii, and Serratia marcescens (CESPM group) produce numerous urinary tract infections (UTIs) which are difficult to treat due to their high multiresistance rate. The objectives of this study were to carry out a systematic review of antibiotic resistances by UTIs and to determine changes over time in urine cultures from a reference hospital in southern Spain. The literature was searched for European data on the resistance rates of each microorganism, and a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study was performed in samples with suspicion of UTI from patients in Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain) between 2016 and the first half of 2021. Among 21,838 positive urine cultures, 1.85% were caused by E. cloacae, 0.77% by M. Morganii, 0.65% by K. aerogenes, 0.46% by C. freundii, 0.29% by P stuartii, and 0.25% by S. marcescens. The lowest resistance rates by microorganism were: E. cloacae to amikacin (3.47%) and imipenem (5.28%); M. morganii to piperacillin-tazobactam (1.79%), cefepime (4.76%), and tobramycin (7.74%); K. aerogenes to tobramycin (3.55%), gentamicin (4.25%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (4.96%), imipenem (5.75%), and cefepime (6.43%); C. freundii to imipenem (no resistance), nitrofurantoin (1.96%), fosfomycin (2.80%), and ertapenem (6.12%); P. stuartii to cefepime (3.28%) and ceftazidime (3.28%); and S. marcescens to gentamicin (1.8%), ciprofloxacin (3.64%), cefepime (3.70%), piperacillin-tazobactam (3.70%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (5.45%). In our setting, CESMP Enterobacteriaceae showed the lowest resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, imipenem, gentamicin, and colistin, which can therefore be recommended for the empirical treatment of UTIs. The COVID-19 pandemic may have had a clinical impact in relation to the increased resistance of E. cloacae and M. morgani to some antibiotics.

In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Obtained from Blood Cultures from Sentinel Public Hospitals in South Africa

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria are responsible for the majority of healthcare-associated infections and pose a serious threat as they complicate and prolong clinical care. A novel cephalosporin-β-lactamase-inhibitor combination, ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) was introduced in 2014, which improved the treatment of MDR pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate the activity of C/T against Escherichia coli (n = 100), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 100), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 100) blood culture isolates in South Africa (SA). Isolates were sequentially selected (2010 to 2020) from the Group for Enteric, Respiratory, and Meningeal Diseases Surveillance (GERMS) programme in SA. Organism identification was performed using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) instrument (Microflex, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), and antibiotic susceptibility was performed using the Sensititre instrument (Trek Diagnostic Systems, East Grinstead, UK). C/T resistance was reported in 16 E. coli, 28 K. pneumoniae and 13 P. aeruginosa isolates. Fifty percent of the C/T resistant isolates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS). According to the whole genome multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis, the E. coli isolates (n = 8) belonged to sequence type (ST)10, ST131, ST405, and ST410, the K. pneumoniae isolates (n = 14) belonged to ST1, ST37, ST73, ST101, ST231, ST307, ST336 and ST6065 (novel ST), and the P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 7) belonged to ST111, ST233, ST273, and ST815. The WGS data also showed that all the E. coli isolates harboured aminoglycoside (aph (3′′)-Ib, aph (6)-Id), macrolide (mdfA, mphA), and sulphonamide (sul2) antibiotic resistance genes, all the K. pneumoniae isolates harboured β-lactam (blaCTX-M-15), and sulphonamide (sul2) antibiotic resistance genes, and all the P. aeruginosa isolates harboured aminoglycoside (aph (3′)-IIb), β-lactam (PAO), fosfomycin (fosA), phenicol (catB7), quinolone (crpP), and disinfectant (qacE) antibiotic resistance genes. It is evident that E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa can adapt pre-existing resistance mechanisms to resist newer β-lactam molecules and inhibitors, since these isolates were not exposed to ceftolozane-tazobactam previously.

Global evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against ESBLs-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with a high range of efficacy and broad-spectrum action against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains.

Objectives

The present study aimed to analyze the in vitro activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs-EC) and Klebsiella pneumonia (ESBLs-KP) in the published literature to provide international data on the antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted on the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar electronic databases from the beginning of databases to December 2022 to cover all published articles relevant to our scope.

Results

At last, 31 publications that met our inclusion criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. The pooled prevalence of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam susceptibility for ESBLs-EC and ESBLs-KP was estimated at 91.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 90.1-92.5%] and 65.6% (95% CI: 60.8-70.2%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity among the 31 studies for ESBLs-EC (χ2 = 91.621; p < 0.001; I2 = 67.256%) and ESBLs-KP (χ2 = 348.72; p < 0.001; I2 = 91.4%). Most clinical isolates of ESBLs-EC had MIC50 and MIC90 at a concentration of 0.5 and 2 µg/mL [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited], respectively. In contrast, most clinical isolates of ESBLs-KP had MIC50 and MIC90 at a concentration of 1 and 32 µg/mL, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on the meta-analysis results, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam has a more promising in vitro antibacterial activity against ESBLs-EC isolates from different clinical sources than ESBLs-KP isolates. Therefore, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam can be a useful therapeutic drug as an alternative to carbapenems. Randomized clinical trials are needed to provide clinical evidence to support these observations.

Development and Research Progress of Anti-Drug Resistant Bacteria Drugs

Bacterial resistance has become increasingly serious because of the widespread use and abuse of antibiotics. In particular, the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria has posed a serious threat to human public health and attracted the attention of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the governments of various countries. Therefore, the establishment of measures against bacterial resistance and the discovery of new antibacterial drugs are increasingly urgent to better contain the emergence of bacterial resistance and provide a reference for the development of new antibacterial drugs. In this review, we discuss some antibiotic drugs that have been approved for clinical use and a partial summary of the meaningful research results of anti-drug resistant bacterial drugs in different fields, including the antibiotic drugs approved by the FDA from 2015 to 2020, the potential drugs against drug-resistant bacteria, the new molecules synthesized by chemical modification, combination therapy, drug repurposing, immunotherapy and other therapies.

New antibiotics for the treatment of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the current literature on novel agents for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some novel agents have recently become available that are expected to replace classical polymyxins as the first-line options for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant NF-GNB infections.

SUMMARY

In this narrative review, we provide a brief overview of the differential activity of various recently approved agents against NF-GNB most encountered in the daily clinical practice, as well as the results from phase-3 randomized clinical trials and large postapproval observational studies, with special focus on NF-GNB. Since resistance to novel agents has already been reported, the use of novel agents needs to be optimized, based on their differential activity (not only in terms of targeted bacteria, but also of resistance determinants), the local microbiological epidemiology, and the most updated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. Large real-life experiences remain of crucial importance for further refining the optimal treatment of NF-GNB infections in the daily clinical practice.

Susceptibility trends of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparators when tested against European Gram-negative bacterial surveillance isolates collected during 2012-18

BACKGROUND

The Program to Assess Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) monitors the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and numerous antimicrobial agents against Gram-negative bacteria worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and resistance trends among Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates in Europe between 2012 and 2018.

METHODS

P. aeruginosa (7503) and Enterobacterales (30 582) isolates were collected from 53 medical centres in 26 countries in Europe and the Mediterranean region and tested for susceptibility by reference broth microdilution method in a central laboratory. MIC results were interpreted using EUCAST criteria.

RESULTS

Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active compound tested against P. aeruginosa isolates after colistin, with overall susceptibility rates of 94.1% in Western Europe and 80.9% in Eastern Europe. Moreover, ceftolozane/tazobactam retained activity against 75.2% and 59.2% of meropenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa isolates in Western and Eastern Europe, respectively. Tobramycin was the third most active compound tested against P. aeruginosa, with susceptibility rates of 88.6% and 70.9% in Western and Eastern Europe, respectively. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was active against 94.5% of all Enterobacterales and 96.1% of meropenem-susceptible isolates from Western Europe. In Eastern Europe, ceftolozane/tazobactam was active against 79.4% of Enterobacterales overall and 86.2% of meropenem-susceptible isolates.

DISCUSSION

Antimicrobial susceptibility rates for agents commonly used to treat serious systemic infections varied widely among nations and geographic regions and were generally lower in Eastern Europe compared with Western Europe. Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated potent activity against P. aeruginosa, including MDR strains, and retained activity against most meropenem-susceptible Enterobacterales causing infection in European medical centres.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

Clinical and Molecular Epidemiologic Characteristics of Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Resistant Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in China

Background

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA)-resistant carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections occur in adults worldwide but are rarely observed in neonates. We evaluated the activities of CZA against CRKP and described the clinical and molecular epidemiology of CZA-resistant CRKP in a NICU prior to CZA approval in China.

Methods

A laboratory-based surveillance of CRKP was conducted from July 2017 to June 2018. Clinical data were initially reviewed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the broth microdilution method. CZA-resistant CRKP isolates were submitted to carbapenemase types screening and multilocus sequence typing.

Results

Over 23.3% (10/43) of CRKP strains were resistant to CZA, MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values being 0.5 μg/mL and >32μg/mL, respectively. Most neonates shared similar clinical features with cesarean (n=8), preterm birth (n=6), low birth weight (n=5), and exposure to carbapenems/β-lactam (n=8). All CZA-resistant CRKP isolates were highly resistant to most tested drugs except for polymyxin B (POL) and tigecycline (TGC). CZA-resistant CRKP isolates showed greater sensitivity to amikacin (AMK), nitrofurantoin (NIT), levofloxacin (LVX) and ciprofloxacin (CIP), compared with CZA-sensitive CRKP. All CZA-resistant CRKP isolates harbored carbapenemase genes, bla_kpc-2 (n=5) being predominant, followed by bla_NDM-1 (n=4) and bla_NDM-5 (n=2). Among these CZA-resistant CRKP isolates, a total of eight different STs were identified. CRKP harboring KPC belonged to ST1419, ST37 and ST11, while NDM types were assigned to ST784, ST1710, ST37 and ST324. Furthermore, other β-lactamase genes including bla_SHV and bla_CTX-M were also found.

Conclusion

Over 23.3% of CRKP strains isolated from neonates were resistant to CZA. Cesarean, preterm birth, low birth weight, and exposure to carbapenems/β-lactam were similar clinical features of most neonates with CZA-resistant CRKP. The predominant carbapenemases of CZA-resistant CRKP were KPC-2 and NDM-1, and KPC-2 producing K. pneumoniae assigned into 3 STs, which indicate the genetic diversity of clinical CZA-resistant CRKP isolates.

Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against recent clinical bacterial isolates from Brazil - the EM200 study

Background

The emergence of antibiotic resistance is increasing and there are few effective antibiotics to treat infections caused by resistant and multidrug resistant bacterial pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane–tazobactam against clinical bacterial isolates from Brazil.

Methods

A total of 673 Gram-negative bacterial isolates including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Enterobacterales collected from 2016 to 2017 were tested, most of them isolated from patients in intensive care units. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC_50/90) were determined by broth microdilution for amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftolozane–tazobactam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, colistin, ertapenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam using dried panels. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria.

Results

Susceptibility rates to ceftolozane–tazobactam ranged from 40.4% to 94.9%. P. aeruginosa susceptibility rate to ceftolozane–tazobactam was 84.9% (MIC_50/90, 1/16 μg/mL) and 99.2% to colistin. For E. coli, ceftolozane–tazobactam inhibited 94.9% (MIC_50/90, 0.25/1 μg/mL) of the microorganisms. The susceptibility rate of K. pneumoniae to ceftolozane–tazobactam was 40.4% (MIC_50/90, 16/>32 μg/mL). Other Enterobacterales have shown susceptibility rates of 81.1% (MIC_50/90, 0.5/16 μg/mL) to ceftolozane–tazobactam, 93.9% to meropenem, 90.9% to amikacin (90.9%), and 88.6% to ertapenem. In non-carbapenemase producing isolates, AmpC mutations were found three isolates.

Conclusions

Ceftolozane–tazobactam has shown relevant activity against a large variety of the analyzed microorganisms collected from multiple centers in Brazil, showing promising results even in multidrug resistant strains.

Dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and their susceptibilities to ceftolozane-tazobactam in Germany

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. Antipseudomonal carbapenems are among the antimicrobial agents used to treat PA infections, but several mechanisms of resistance, including the production of a carbapenemase (CP), may compromise their clinical efficacy. The objectives of this study were to determine: (i) the dissemination of carbapenem-resistant CP-negative and CP-positive PA isolates; and (ii) the in-vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam (CTT) against carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant isolates. Isolates were collected prospectively from January 2016 to April 2017 at 20 German medical laboratories. Each centre was asked to provide 50 consecutive isolates from hospitalized patients. Overall, 985 isolates were collected, of which 34% were obtained from intensive care patients. Seven hundred and thirty-eight (74.9%) isolates were susceptible to both imipenem and meropenem (Subgroup I), and 247 (25.1%) isolates were resistant to carbapenems (Subgroup II): 125 (12.7%) were imipenem-resistant but meropenem-susceptible, 12 (1.2%) were meropenem-resistant but imipenem-susceptible, and 110 (11.2%) were resistant to both carbapenems (Subgroup III). A CP was detected in 28 (2.8%) isolates (predominantly VIM-2). Nine hundred and fifty (96.4%) isolates were CTT-susceptible. Susceptibility to CTT was seen in 99.6% of Subgroup I isolates, 87% of Subgroup II isolates and 74.5% of Subgroup III isolates. Overall, 2.8% of PA produced a CP, while 22.2% were carbapenem-resistant, CP-non-producing isolates. Based on these findings, CTT may be considered for treatment of PA infections, particularly those caused by multi-drug-resistant CP-non-producing isolates.

Stability of ceftolozane and tazobactam in different peritoneal dialysis solutions

BACKGROUND

Peritonitis is a common and serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). PD-associated peritonitis (PDAP) caused by Pseudomonas is usually resistant to most antibiotics, resulting in high failure rates. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) has been shown to be effective in treating urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections caused by beta-lactam resistant Pseudomonas and other gram-negative bacteria. Given its favourable adverse effects profile, it has a potential role in the treatment of PDAP caused by Pseudomonas species resistant to other antibiotics. Intraperitoneal administration of antibiotics admixed with PD solutions for the treatment of PDAP is associated with superior outcomes. However, there is a lack of published data on the stability of C/T in PD solutions. Therefore, this study investigated the physical and chemical stability of C/T in commonly used PD solutions at different temperatures.

METHODS

A total of 27 PD bags (3 PD bags for each type of PD solution including Dianeal®, Extraneal®, Balance® and Physioneal® PD bags) containing C/T were prepared and stored at 25°C for 6 h, followed by 4°C for 168 h and then 37°C for 12 h. An aliquot from each PD bag was withdrawn, and the concentration of C/T before (0 h) and after predefined time points was determined using a stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Samples were also assessed for pH, colour change and particulate matter immediately after preparation and on each day of analysis.

RESULTS

C/T retained more than 97% of their initial concentration when stored at 25°C for 6 h followed by storage at 4°C for 168 h and then at 37°C for 12 h. Particle formation was not detected at any time under the tested storage conditions. The pH and colour remained essentially unchanged throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide a platform for clinical studies to determine the safety and therapeutic efficacy of intraperitoneal C/T for the treatment of PDAP caused by resistant Pseudomonas species.

[S2k guidelines of the PEG on calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial diseases in adults : Focussed summary and supplementary information on antibiotic treatment of critically ill patients]

In January 2018 the recent revision of the S2k guidelines on calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial diseases in adults-update 2018 (Editor: Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy, PEG) was realized. It is a helpful tool for the complex infectious disease setting in an intensive care unit. The present summary of the guidelines focuses on the topics of anti-infective agents, including new substances, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as well as on microbiology, resistance development and recommendations for calculated drug therapy in septic patients. As in past revisions the recent resistance situation and results of new clinical studies are considered and anti-infective agents are summarized in a table.

Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Combination Versus Meropenem for Treating Nosocomial Pneumonia

This study reports the integrated analysis of two phase III studies of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combination versus meropenem for treating nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The ASPECT-NP trial compared the efficacy and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treating NP/VAP. The REPROVE trial compared ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem in the treatment of NP/VAP. A total of 1528 patients (361 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group; 405 in the ceftazidime-avibactam group; 762 in the meropenem group) were analyzed. The clinical cure rates at test-of-cure among the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations group were non-inferior to those of the meropenem (70.7% vs. 72.1%, risk difference (RD) -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.05) in the clinical evaluable populations. Overall 28-day mortality did not differ between novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations and the meropenem group (RD, -0.02, 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.05). Regarding the microbiological eradication rate, novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations were non-inferior to meropenem for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus marcescens, and Enterobacter cloacae. Finally, novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations had a similar risk of (i) treatment-emergent adverse events (RD, 0.02, 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.06), (ii) events leading to the discontinuation of the study drug (RD, 0.00, 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03), (iii) severe adverse events (RD, 0.03, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.07), and (iv) death (RD, 0.02, 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.05) when compared with meropenem group. In conclusion, our findings suggest that novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations of ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam can be recommended as one of the therapeutic options in the treatment of NP/VAP.

Results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2017 of the In Vitro Activities of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T), and comparators were determined for 1,774 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and 524 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected by 30 medical centers from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2017. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the CLSI broth microdilution method, and blaKPC and blaNDM were detected by PCR for all carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated potent activity against almost all Enterobacteriaceae (94.6% susceptibility; MIC50, ≤0.25 mg/liter; MIC90, ≤0.25 to >32 mg/liter) and good activity against P. aeruginosa (86.5% susceptibility; MIC50/90, 2/16 mg/liter). Among the CRE, 50.8% (189/372 isolates) were positive for blaKPC-2, which mainly existed in ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (92.1%, 174/189). Among the CRE, 17.7% (66/372 isolates) were positive for blaNDM, which mainly existed in strains resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (71.7%, 66/92). Ceftolozane-tazobactam showed good in vitro activity against Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis (MIC50/90, ≤0.5/2 mg/liter; 90.5 and 93.8% susceptibility, respectively), and the rates of susceptibility of K. pneumoniae (MIC50/90, 2/>64 mg/liter) and P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 1/8 mg/liter) were 52.7% and 88.5%, respectively. Among the CRE strains, 28.6% of E. coli isolates and 85% of K. pneumoniae isolates were still susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, but only 7.1% and 1.9% of them, respectively, were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. The rates of susceptibility of the carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates to ceftazidime-avibactam (65.7%) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (68%) were similar. Overall, both ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam were highly active against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa recently collected across China, and ceftazidime-avibactam showed activity superior to that of ceftolozane-tazobactam against Enterobacteriaceae, whereas ceftolozane-tazobactam showed a better effect against P. aeruginosa.

An update on antimicrobial resistance and the role of newer antimicrobial agents for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major health concern, especially hospital-acquired infections, in critically ill individuals. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) increases the morbidity and mortality rates associated with pseudomonal infections. In this review, we aim to address two major aspects of P. aeruginosa. The first part of the review will focus on the burden of AMR and its prevailing mechanisms seen in India, while the second part will focus on the challenges and approaches in the management with special emphasis on the role of newer antimicrobial agents.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates recovered from intensive care unit patients in Spain: The SUPERIOR multicentre study

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) present a high risk of developing an infection caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Consequently, new antimicrobials and combinations are required. In this study, the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) was evaluated against Enterobacterales (n = 400) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 80) clinical isolates collected from patients in Spanish ICUs with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). Overall susceptibility to C/T in P. aeruginosa isolates by infection type was 95.7% in cUTI (MIC_50/90, 1/4 mg/L) and 85.3% in cIAI (MIC_50/90, 1/64 mg/L). Activity against P. aeruginosa was maintained regardless of its resistance pattern, confirming that C/T is one of the best antipseudomonal agents along with colistin and amikacin. Susceptibility to C/T in Enterobacterales by infection type was 79.5/81.9% and 89.3/92.3% (EUCAST/CLSI) in cIAI and cUTI isolates, respectively. Activity was excellent against wild-type organisms, with 100% susceptible and inhibited at MIC ≤1 mg/L. Nevertheless, C/T susceptibility decreased against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates: Escherichia coli (80.4/84.8% susceptible by EUCAST/CLSI) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (59.1/77.3% susceptible by EUCAST/CLSI). No activity of C/T was observed in carbapenemase-producing isolates. The in vitro activity of C/T observed in this surveillance study suggests that this agent can be considered as a therapeutic option for cUTI and cIAI due to Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa in ICU patients, particularly when carbapenemase-producing isolates are not involved.

Infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria: What's new in our arsenal and what's in the pipeline?

The spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria is an ever-growing concern, particularly among Gram-negative bacteria because of their intrinsic resistance and how quickly they acquire and spread new resistance mechanisms. Treating infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria is a challenge for medical practitioners and increases patient mortality and cost of care globally. This vulnerability, along with strategies to tackle antimicrobial resistance development, prompts the development of new antibiotic agents and exploration of alternative treatment options. This article summarises the new antibiotics that have recently been approved for Gram-negative bacterial infections, looks down the pipeline at promising agents currently in phase I, II, or III clinical trials, and introduces new alternative avenues that show potential in combating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

High-Precision Control of Plasma Drug Levels Using Feedback-Controlled Dosing

By, in effect, rendering pharmacokinetics an experimentally adjustable parameter, the ability to perform feedback-controlled dosing informed by high-frequency in vivo drug measurements would prove a powerful tool for both pharmacological research and clinical practice. Efforts to this end, however, have historically been thwarted by an inability to measure in vivo drug levels in real time and with sufficient convenience and temporal resolution. In response, we describe a closed-loop, feedback-controlled delivery system that uses drug level measurements provided by an in vivo electrochemical aptamer-based (E-AB) sensor to adjust dosing rates every 7 s. The resulting system supports the maintenance of either constant or predefined time-varying plasma drug concentration profiles in live rats over many hours. For researchers, the resultant high-precision control over drug plasma concentrations provides an unprecedented opportunity to (1) map the relationships between pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes, (2) eliminate inter- and intrasubject metabolic variation as a confounding experimental variable, (3) accurately simulate human pharmacokinetics in animal models, and (4) measure minute-to-minute changes in a drug's pharmacokinetic behavior in response to changing health status, diet, drug-drug interactions, or other intrinsic and external factors. In the clinic, feedback-controlled drug delivery would improve our ability to accurately maintain therapeutic drug levels in the face of large, often unpredictable intra- and interpatient metabolic variation. This, in turn, would improve the efficacy and safety of therapeutic intervention, particularly for the most gravely ill patients, for whom metabolic variability is highest and the margin for therapeutic error is smallest.

Multicenter Evaluation of the Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (in combination with metronidazole) and complicated urinary tract infections. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the C/T Etest, a gradient diffusion method. C/T Etest was compared to broth microdilution (BMD) for 51 Enterobacteriaceae challenge isolates and 39 Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenge isolates at three clinical sites. Essential agreement (EA) between the methods ranged from 47 to 49/51 (92.2 to 96.1%) for the Enterobacteriaceae, and categorical agreement (CA) ranged from 49 to 51/51 (96.1 to 100.0%). EA and CA for P. aeruginosa were 100% at all sites. The C/T Etest was also compared to BMD for susceptibility testing on 966 clinical isolates (793 Enterobacteriaceae, including 167 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 159 Escherichia coli isolates, in addition to 173 P. aeruginosa isolates) collected at four clinical sites. EA between Etest and BMD was 96.9% for Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 98.8% for P. aeruginosa isolates. Within the Enterobacteriaceae, isolates from each species examined had >96% CA. For the clinical isolates, no very major errors were identified but two major errors were found (one for K. pneumoniae and one for Providencia rettgeri). By BMD, 47.0% of Enterobacteriaceae and 46.2% of P. aeruginosa challenge strains were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria; 8.2% of clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 12.1% of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria. In conclusion, Etest is accurate and reproducible for C/T susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa.

Treatment of a complex orthopaedic infection due to extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 51 000 healthcare-associated infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa occur annually in the USA, more than 6000 of which (13%) are caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) strains. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL/TAZ) (Zerbaxa) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2014 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections. At this time, clinical data on the role of TOL/TAZ treatment outside of FDA-approved indications is limited. Herein, we present a case of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa osteomyelitis of the upper extremity, which was successfully treated with TOL/TAZ for 8 weeks with optimal clinical and laboratory responses. Monotherapy with TOL/TAZ appears effective for treatment of complicated bone and joint infections with XDR P. aeruginosa in combination with comprehensive surgical management, particularly when few antibiotic options exist.