Masked hypertension, rather than white-coat hypertension, has a prognostic role in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease

Prognostic value of nighttime blood pressure in patients with chronic kidney disease

The optimal blood pressure (BP) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains uncertain. Therefore, this cohort study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in patients with CKD and to determine the optimal range for ABP. In total, 1051 hospitalized patients with CKD were enrolled. The prognosis of patients with CKD was evaluated in terms of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiovascular events, and renal events. Our results showed that systolic blood pressure (SBP) had a higher predictive value than diastolic blood pressure in the multivariate-adjusted models. Additionally, nighttime SBP was found to be the best predictor of prognosis in patients with CKD. Furthermore, when dividing the nighttime SBP into quartiles (quartile 1: <110 mmHg, quartile 2: 110-124 mmHg, quartile 3:124-139 mmHg, and quartile 4: ≥139 mmHg). Nighttime SBP ≥ 124 mmHg had an impact on prognosis in patients with CKD, nighttime SBP 124-139 mmHg: total mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 3.017 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.367-6.660]), cardiovascular death (HR, 2.570 [95% CI, 1.744-6.151]), all cardiovascular events (HR, 2.401 [95% CI, 1.288-4.475]), and 110-124 mmHg had an impact on the renal prognosis (HR, 1.975 [95% CI, 1.311-2.976]). Therefore, nighttime SBP is an independent risk factor for CKD and a significant predictor of prognosis in patients with CKD. Furthermore, the prognosis of patients with CKD improved when the nighttime SBP was maintained below 124 mmHg; however, maintaining it below 110 mmHg can further lower the incidence of renal disease.

MR T2* Map to Predict Worsening Hypertension Control: A Preliminary Study

Blood pressure measurement is important in monitoring hypertension. However, blood pressure does not provide much information about renal condition in treated hypertension. This study aimed to evaluate renal oxygenation in hypertensive patients using T2* mapping. Subgroup analysis explored whether R2* values can guide adjustments in antihypertensive treatment. A total of 140 consecutive subjects were recruited: 87 hypertensive subjects and 53 normotensive subjects. Hypertensive subjects were classified into non-medication (non-med), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), and non-ARB-treated groups. Each group was divided into good and poor control subgroups based on blood pressure at enrollment. T2* mapping was utilized to assess renal cortical and medullary R2* values. After a 2-year follow-up, subjects were categorized into stable and unstable based on the need for treatment modifications. The unstable subgroup had higher medullary R2* values than the stable subgroup in all followed patients (p < 0.05). Additionally, the unstable merged non-med with ARB subgroup had higher medullary R2* values overall (p < 0.05) and within the good control subgroup (p < 0.05). Patients with stable hypertension, especially those with good control managed through lifestyle modifications or ARBs, exhibited lower renal medullary R2* values, suggesting higher renal oxygenation.

The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on hypertension phenotypes (ESH ABPM COVID-19 study)

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on medical care. This study evaluated the influence of the pandemic on blood pressure (BP) control and hypertension phenotypes as assessed by office and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were collected from 33 centers including Excellence Centers of the European Society of Hypertension. Two groups of patients with treated hypertension were compared. Pandemic group: including participants who had ABPM twice - at visit 2 during the COVID-19 pandemic and visit 1 performed 9-15 months prior to visit 2. Pre-pandemic group: had ABPM at two visits, performed before the pandemic within 9-15 months interval. We determined the following hypertension phenotypes: masked hypertension, white coat hypertension, sustained controlled hypertension (SCH) and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH). We analyzed the prevalence of phenotypes and their changes between visits.

RESULTS

Data of 1419 patients, 616 (43 %) in the pandemic group and 803 (57 %) in the pre-pandemic group, were analyzed. At baseline (visit 1), the prevalence of hypertension phenotypes did not differ between groups. In the pandemic group, the change in hypertension phenotypes between two visits was not significant (p = 0.08). In contrast, in the pre-pandemic group, the prevalence of SCH increased during follow-up (28.8 % vs 38.4 %, p < 0.01) while the prevalence of SUCH decreased (34.2 % vs 27.8 %, p < 0.01). In multivariable adjusted analysis, the only factor influencing negative changes of hypertension phenotypes was the COVID-19 pandemic period.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on BP control assessed by hypertension phenotypes.

Masked phenomenon: renal and cardiovascular complications; review and updates

BACKGROUND

In the in-clinic blood pressure (BP) recording setting, a sizable number of individuals with normal BP and approximately 30% of patients with chronic renal disease (CKD) exhibit elevated outpatient BP records. These individuals are known as masked hypertension (MHTN), and when they are on antihypertensive medications, but their BP is not controlled, they are called masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUHTN). The masked phenomenon (MP) (MHTN and MUHTN) increases susceptibility to end-organ damage (a two-fold greater risk for cardiovascular events and kidney dysfunction). The potential extension of the observed benefits of MP therapy, including a reduction in end-organ damage, remains questionable.

AIM AND METHODS

This review aims to study the diagnostic methodology, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and significance of MP management in end-organs, especially the kidneys, cardiovascular system, and outcomes. To achieve the purposes of this non-systematic comprehensive review, PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar were searched using keywords, texts, and phrases such as masked phenomenon, CKD and HTN, HTN types, HTN definition, CKD progression, masked HTN, MHTN, masked uncontrolled HTN, CKD onset, and cardiovascular system and MHTN. We restricted the search process to the last ten years to search for the latest updates.

CONCLUSION

MHTN is a variant of HTN that can be missed if medical professionals are unaware of it. Early detection by ambulatory or home BP recording in susceptible individuals reduces end-organ damage and progresses to sustained HTN. Adherence to the available recommendations when dealing with masked phenomena is justifiable; however, further studies and recommendation updates are required.

Prevalence and Cardio-Renal Comorbidities of Masked Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

AIM

The prognosis of masked hypertension is controversial. The aims of this meta-analysis were to determine the global prevalence of masked hypertension and to better understand its association with the risk of cardiorenal comorbidities and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase (OVID), The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, and CNKI databases for relevant studies published from inception until January 15, 2024. Cohort studies that reported an association of masked hypertension with the risk of cardiorenal comorbidities and all-cause mortality were eligible for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies (with 129,061 participants) were included. The median follow-up duration was 7.38 years. The pooled prevalence of masked hypertension was 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15%-21%). Compared with normotensive individuals, those with masked hypertension had an increased risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.32-2.04) and incident cardiovascular disease (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.45-1.69). The results were similar regardless of treatment status and in multiple subgroup analyses. Masked hypertension was also associated with increased risks of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.02-2.78) and composite renal outcomes (RR 3.57, 95% CI 2.32-5.50).

CONCLUSION

Masked hypertension is prevalent in adults and associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular mortality, and composite renal events.

White Coat Hypertension & Cardiovascular Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to inform the reader of the complexity of blood pressure responses when comparing blood pressure measured in the medical environment to that outside the medical environment. In addition, we summarize what is known about current predictors of white coat hypertension, reevaluate the relationship of white coat hypertension to cardiovascular outcomes, and provide some clinical guidance on management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Differences in outcomes exist when white coat effect occurs in unmedicated people versus the white coat effects in those on antihypertensive therapy. White coat hypertension is relatively common, carries a small but definite increase in cardiovascular risk, and is prone to conversion to sustained hypertension. Future research will hopefully tease out the roles of ancillary findings that characterize a white coat hypertensive (like modest elevations in creatinine, glucose and triglycerides) in the elevated cardiovascular risk, and test the effectiveness of mitigation strategies in these patients.

Hypertension in China: epidemiology and treatment initiatives

The past two to three decades have seen a steady increase in the prevalence of hypertension in China, largely owing to increased life expectancy and lifestyle changes (particularly among individuals aged 35-44 years). Data from the China hypertension survey conducted in 2012-2015 revealed a high prevalence of grade 3 hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg) in the general population, which increased with age to up to 5% among individuals aged ≥65 years. The risk profile of patients with hypertension in China has also been a subject of intense study in the past 30 years. Dietary sodium and potassium intake have remained largely the same in China in the past three decades, and salt substitution strategies seem to be effective in reducing blood pressure levels and the risk of cardiovascular events and death. However, the number of individuals with risk factors for hypertension and cardiovascular disease in general, such as physical inactivity and obesity, has increased dramatically in the same period. Moreover, even in patients diagnosed with hypertension, their disease is often poorly managed owing to a lack of patient education and poor treatment compliance. In this Review, we summarize the latest epidemiological data on hypertension in China, discuss the risk factors for hypertension that are specific to this population, and describe several ongoing nationwide hypertension control initiatives that target these risk factors, especially in the low-resource rural setting.

The prevalence of masked hypertension in patients with lone atrial fibrillation: a cross sectional analytical study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in individuals with essential hypertension (HTN). Masked hypertension occurs in up to 15% of the general population and is associated with adverse clinical outcome. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the prevalence of masked hypertension in apparently normotensive individuals with lone AF. A cross sectional analytical study performed at the Rabin Medical Center included all patients > 18 years who visited the emergency department (ED) in the years 2018-2021 with idiopathic AF, had normal blood pressure (BP) values during their ED visit and did not have a history of hypertension or current use of anti-hypertensives. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed in all eligible patients within 30 days from ED visit. Data collected included information from the ED visit and data extracted from the monitoring device. A total of 1258 patients were screened for eligibility, of which 40 were included in the analysis. The average age was 53.4 ± 16 years, 28 patients (70%) were males. Overall, 18 individuals (46%) had abnormal BP values according to the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis of hypertension. Of these, 12 had abnormal 24-h BP average (≥ 125/75 mmHg), one had isolated daytime abnormal average (≥ 130/80 mmHg) and 11 had isolated night time abnormal average (≥ 110/65 mmHg). Masked hypertension is prevalent in patients with lone AF without a diagnosis of HTN and performing ABPM in such individuals should be strongly considered.

Hypertension as Cardiovascular Risk Factor in Chronic Kidney Disease

Hypertension is the leading modifiable cause of premature death and hence one of the global targets of World Health Organization for prevention. Hypertension also affects the great majority of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both hypertension and CKD are intrinsically related, as hypertension is a strong determinant of worse renal and cardiovascular outcomes and renal function decline aggravates hypertension. This bidirectional relationship is well documented by the high prevalence of hypertension across CKD stages and the dual benefits of effective antihypertensive treatments on renal and cardiovascular risk reduction. Achieving an optimal blood pressure (BP) target is mandatory and requires several pharmacological and lifestyle measures. However, it also requires a correct diagnosis based on reliable BP measurements (eg, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, home BP), especially for populations like patients with CKD where reduced or reverse dipping patterns or masked and resistant hypertension are frequent and associated with a poor cardiovascular and renal prognosis. Even after achieving BP targets, which remain debated in CKD, the residual cardiovascular risk remains high. Current antihypertensive options have been enriched with novel agents that enable to lower the existing renal and cardiovascular risks, such as SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors and novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Although their beneficial effects may be driven mostly from actions beyond BP control, recent evidence underline potential improvements on abnormal 24-hour BP phenotypes such as nondipping. Other promising novelties are still to come for the management of hypertension in CKD. In the present review, we shall discuss the existing evidence of hypertension as a cardiovascular risk factor in CKD, the importance of identifying hypertension phenotypes among patients with CKD, and the traditional and novel aspects of the management of hypertensives with CKD.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the management of hypertension

ABSTRACT

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has become indispensable in the current management of hypertension. ABPM is particularly useful in the accurate diagnosis of hypertension. Its diagnostic thresholds had been recently established based on hard clinical outcomes. Cross-classification of patients according to office and ambulatory blood pressure identifies white-coat, masked, and sustained hypertension. ABPM is also useful in cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment. It provides information on daytime and nighttime blood pressure and circadian rhythm, particularly nighttime blood pressure dipping. Nighttime blood pressure is predictive of CV risk independent of office and daytime blood pressure. Isolated nocturnal hypertension is a special form of masked hypertension, with normal daytime but elevated nocturnal blood pressure. It also helps in the evaluation of blood pressure fluctuation and variation, such as morning blood pressure surge and reading-to-reading blood pressure variability. ABPM may derive several other indexes, such as ambulatory blood pressure index and salt sensitivity index, which may be useful in CV evaluations.

Lower ambulatory nocturnal SBP is associated with less cardiovascular and renal damage in normotensive hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

The impact of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) on target organ damage (TOD) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with normotension has not been established. In this study, we determined whether nocturnal BP is correlated with cardiovascular and renal damage independent of the 24-h BP in CKD patients with normotension or hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 1166 hospitalized patients with CKD not requiring dialysis were enrolled in this cross-sectional study, 421 and 745 of whom had normotension and hypertension, respectively. TOD was assessed by the left ventricular mass index (LVMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and presence of proteinuria. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between nocturnal BP and TOD.

RESULTS

In the multivariable-adjusted models, including the 24-h BP, nocturnal SBP was independently associated with the LVMI, eGFR and proteinuria in patients with normotension (P < 0.05), while the nocturnal DBP was not correlated with proteinuria. The nocturnal SBP was associated with LVMI and proteinuria, but not the eGFR in patients with hypertension. We did not demonstrate an association between nocturnal DBP and TOD in these patients. When nocturnal SBP in patients with normotension was further divided into tertiles [tertile 1 (<104 mmHg), tertile 2 (104-114 mmHg) and tertile 3 (≥114 mmHg)], multivariate analysis showed that tertile 3 was independently associated with TOD.

CONCLUSION

Nocturnal SBP was shown to be an independent risk factor for TOD in patients with normotension. Targeting a nocturnal ambulatory SBP to less than 114 mmHg or even less than 104 mmHg may help prevent TOD in patients with CKD.

Clinical features and predictors of masked uncontrolled hypertension from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The clinical characteristics of patients with masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) have been poorly defined, and few studies have investigated the clinical predictors of MUCH. We investigated the demographic, clinical, and blood pressure (BP) characteristics of patients with MUCH and proposed a prediction model for MUCH in patients with hypertension.

METHODS

We analyzed 1,986 subjects who were enrolled in the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (Kor-ABP) Registry and taking antihypertensive drugs, and classified them into the controlled hypertension (n = 465) and MUCH (n = 389) groups. MUCH was defined as the presence of a 24-hour ambulatory mean systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 80 mmHg in patients treated with antihypertensive drugs, having normal office BP.

RESULTS

Patients in the MUCH group had significantly worse metabolic profiles and higher office BP, and took significantly fewer antihypertensive drugs compared to those in the controlled hypertension group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified high office systolic BP and diastolic BP, prior stroke, dyslipidemia, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH, ≥ 116 g/m2 for men, and ≥ 96 g/m2 for women), high heart rate (≥ 75 beats/min), and single antihypertensive drug use as independent predictors of MUCH. A prediction model using these predictors showed a high diagnostic accuracy (C-index of 0.839) and goodness-of-fit for the presence of MUCH.

CONCLUSION

MUCH is associated with a high-normal increase in office BP and underuse of antihypertensive drugs, as well as dyslipidemia, prior stroke, and LVH, which could underscore achieving optimal BP control. The proposed model accurately predicts MUCH in patients with controlled office BP.

Twenty-Four-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

The diagnosis, management, and estimated mortality risk in patients with hypertension have been historically based on clinic or office blood pressure readings. Current evidence indicates that 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring should be an integral part of hypertension care. The 24-hour ambulatory monitors currently available on the market are small devices connected to the arm cuff with tubing that measure blood pressure every 15 to 30 minutes. After 24 hours, the patient returns, and the data are downloaded, including any information requested by the physician in a diary. The most useful information includes the 24-hour average blood pressure, the average daytime blood pressure, the average nighttime blood pressure, and the calculated percentage drop in blood pressure at night. The most widely used criteria for 24-hour measurements are from the American Heart Association 2017 guidelines and the European Society of Hypertension 2018 guidelines. Two important scenarios described in this document are white coat hypertension, in which patients have normal blood pressures at home but high blood pressures during office visits, and masked hypertension, in which patients are normotensive in the clinic but have high blood pressures outside of the office. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has made changes in its policy to allow reimbursement for a broader use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring within some specific guidelines. Primary care physicians should make more use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, especially in patients with difficult to manage hypertension.

Masked morning hypertension correlated with target organ damage in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of masked morning hypertension and investigate its role in target organ damage in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

A total of 1841 patients with chronic kidney disease admitted to our hospital were recruited. According to measurements of clinic blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure, they were divided into four groups: normotension, white-coat hypertension, masked morning hypertension, and sustained hypertension. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between masked morning hypertension and cardiovascular and renal parameters.

RESULTS

Overall, 288 (15.6%) patients were diagnosed with masked morning hypertension. Patients with masked morning hypertension had a higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, abnormal carotid intima-media thickness, and impaired renal function when compared with normotensive patients, although lower than those with sustained hypertension. After adjustment for demographics and clinical characteristics, masked morning hypertension was related to cardiovascular damage and renal dysfunction compared with normotension. The odds ratio for left ventricular hypertrophy, abnormal carotid intima-media thickness and impaired renal function was 1.955 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.247-3.065], 1.469 (95% CI: 1.011-2.133), and 1.819 (95% CI: 1.112-2.976), respectively. Masked morning hypertension correlated with target organ damage even when patients with a history of cardiovascular disease were excluded.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of masked morning hypertension in nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients was high, and masked morning hypertension was associated with target organ damage in chronic kidney disease patients.

Blood pressure phenotypes based on ambulatory monitoring in a general middle-aged population

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is increasingly recommended for clinical use, but more knowledge about the prevalence and variability in ABPM-derived phenotypes in the general population is needed. We describe these parameters in the community-based Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) cohort.

METHODS

We examined 5881 men and women aged 50-64 with 24-hour ABPM recordings using validated monitors. ABPM phenotypes were defined according to European guidelines. White coat hypertension was defined as elevated office BP (≥140/90 mmHg) with normal mean ambulatory BP (<135/85 mmHg in day-time, <120/70 mmHg in night-time, <130/80 mmHg over 24-h); and masked hypertension as normal office BP (<140/90 mmHg) with elevated mean ambulatory BP (≥135/85 mmHg in day-time, ≥120/70 mmHg in night-time, ≥130/80 mmHg over 24-h). Blood pressure variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), and average real variability.

RESULTS

Based on the ABPM recordings, 36.9% of participants had 24-h hypertension, 40.7% had day-time hypertension, and 37.6% nocturnal hypertension. Among participants treated with anti-hypertensive drugs, one in three had elevated office blood pressures, and more than half had elevated 24-h, day-time or nocturnal blood pressures. Among participants without anti-hypertensive drugs, only one in six had elevated office blood pressures, but one in three had elevated 24-h, day-time or nocturnal blood pressures. Men had higher 24-h blood pressures, more masked hypertension, but less white-coat hypertension than women. The prevalence of white-coat hypertension increased with age, but not the prevalence of masked hypertension. A positive association between blood pressure level and variability was observed, and within-person and between-person SD and CV were of similar magnitude. The variance in ABPM on repeated measurements was substantial.

CONCLUSIONS

In the middle-aged general population, masked hypertension is an underappreciated problem on the population level.

Prognostic Significance of Ambulatory BP Monitoring in CKD: A Report from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study

BACKGROUND

Whether ambulatory BP monitoring is of value in evaluating risk for outcomes in patients with CKD is not clear.

METHODS

We followed 1502 participants of the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study for a mean of 6.72 years. We evaluated, as exposures, ambulatory BP monitoring profiles (masked uncontrolled hypertension, white-coat effect, sustained hypertension, and controlled BP), mean ambulatory BP monitoring and clinic BPs, and diurnal variation in BP-reverse dipper (higher at nighttime), nondipper, and dipper (lower at nighttime). Outcomes included cardiovascular disease (a composite of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, heart failure, and peripheral arterial disease), kidney disease (a composite of ESKD or halving of the eGFR), and mortality.

RESULTS

Compared with having controlled BP, the presence of masked uncontrolled hypertension independently associated with higher risk of the cardiovascular outcome and the kidney outcome, but not with all-cause mortality. Higher mean 24-hour systolic BP associated with higher risk of cardiovascular outcome, kidney outcome, and mortality, independent of clinic BP. Participants with the reverse-dipper profile of diurnal BP variation were at higher risk of the kidney outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of participants with CKD, BP metrics derived from ambulatory BP monitoring are associated with cardiovascular outcomes, kidney outcomes, and mortality, independent of clinic BP. Masked uncontrolled hypertension and mean 24-hour BP associated with high risk of cardiovascular disease and progression of kidney disease. Alterations of diurnal variation in BP are associated with high risk of progression of kidney disease, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. These data support the wider use of ambulatory BP monitoring in the evaluation of hypertension in patients with CKD.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2020_09_24_JASN2020030236.mp3.

A comparative meta-analysis of prospective observational studies on masked hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension defined by ambulatory and home blood pressure

BACKGROUND

In a comparative meta-analysis, we investigated the prognostic value of masked hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension defined by ambulatory or home blood pressure (BP) monitoring.

METHODS

We searched English literature published till 2 September 2018 to identify prospective observational studies. Masked hypertension was defined as a normal clinic BP (<140/90 mmHg) in the presence of an elevated 24 h, daytime or night-time ambulatory or home BP. Clinical outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular, stroke, cardiac, coronary and renal disease events.

RESULTS

In total, 21 studies (n = 130 318) were included. Overall, compared with normotensive participants, masked hypertensive patients had a 5.7/2.9 mmHg higher clinic BP and 18.7/9.8 mmHg higher out-of-office BP. The pooled risk ratio for masked hypertension versus normotension was 1.67 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.13) and 2.19 (1.72-2.78) for all-cause (eight studies) and cardiovascular mortality (three studies), respectively, and 1.71 (1.53-1.91), 1.95 (1.36-2.80), 1.76 (1.33-2.33), 1.62 (0.27-9.60), 3.85 (2.03-7.31) for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular (15 studies), stroke (two studies), cardiac (two studies), coronary (two studies) and renal disease events (two studies), respectively. Risk ratios for all-cause mortality (1.78 versus 1.40, P = 0.16) and fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (1.81 versus 1.61, P = 0.29) were similar between studies on ambulatory and home BP monitoring in the overall analyses. The analyses in subgroups according to treatment status (untreated, treated or mixed) and sampling approach (population or referred patients) were confirmatory.

CONCLUSION

Masked hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension were associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes, regardless of the out-of-office BP monitoring techniques.

White-coat hypertension and incident end-stage renal disease in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: results from the C-STRIDE Study

Background

Controversy remains whether white coat hypertension (WCH) is associated with renal prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

In the present multicenter, prospective study, we analyzed data of participants with CKD stage 1–4 from the Chinese Cohort Study of Chronic Kidney Disease (C-STRIDE). WCH was defined according to two criteria as follows: A, clinical blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 mm Hg and average 24-h ambulatory BP < 130/80 mm Hg; B, clinical BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg and daytime ambulatory BP < 130/80 mm Hg. Renal outcome was defined as initiation of renal replacement therapy. The association of WCH with renal events was evaluated by Cox regression model.

Results

A total of 1714 patients with CKD were included in the present analysis. The mean age of the population was 48.9 ± 13.8 years and 56.8% were men. The mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 52.2 ± 30.1 ml/min/1.73 m² and urinary protein was 1.0 (0.4, 2.4) g/day. The overall prevalence of WCH was 4.7% and 16.6% according to criteria A and B, respectively. Incidence rates of renal events were 49.58 and 26.51 according to criteria A and B, respectively, per 1000 person-years during a median follow-up of 4.8 years. After full adjustment, WCH was associated with an increased risk of renal event (criterion A: hazard ratio 2.36, 95% confidence interval 1.29–4.34; for criterion B: hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.04–3.49) compared with patients with normal BP.

Conclusions

WCH is associated with a greater risk for renal events in non-dialysis dependent Chinese patients with CKD.

Blood pressure phenotype reproducibility in CKD outpatients: a clinical practice report

Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is encouraged by recent hypertension guidelines for assessing BP phenotypes. These showed acceptable reproducibility in the short term, but few data exist about long-term reproducibility, particularly for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We evaluated changes of the BP phenotypes at 6 and 12 months in 280 consecutive non-dialysis CKD outpatients (186 males, age 71 ± 12 years, eGFR 38 ± 13 ml/min/1.73), without any change in drug therapy. Elevated BP is defined as office BP > 140/90 and home BP > 135/85 mmHg for defining the following BP phenotypes: sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH); white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH); masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH); and controlled hypertension (CH). At baseline, the prevalence of the phenotypes was SUCH 36.6%, CH 30.1%, WUCH 25.4% and MUCH 7.9%, and it was similar at 6 months and 12 months. On the other hand, individual phenotype reproducibility at 12 months was poor both overall (38.0%) and across the different phenotypes (SUCH 53.9%, WUCH 32.4% and CH 32.1%, MUCH 9.1%). Patients who were not maintaining the same phenotype (non-concordant) were not distinguished by age, sex, BMI, eGFR, presence of diabetes or cardiovascular disease, or pharmacological therapy. When reproducibility of BP phenotypes both at 6 months and at 12 months was assessed, it was very low (19.6%), particularly for MUCH (0%), CH (14%) and WUCH (15.5%), while it was 31% for SUCH. In a CKD cohort, the overall prevalence of the different BP phenotypes defined by office and home BP remains constant over time. However, only 38% of patients maintained the same phenotype at 12 months, suggesting a poor reproducibility over time for the BP phenotypes.

Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in White Coat Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The long-term cardiovascular risk of isolated elevated office blood pressure (BP) is unclear.

PURPOSE

To summarize the risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality associated with untreated white coat hypertension (WCH) and treated white coat effect (WCE).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and EMBASE, without language restriction, from inception to December 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Observational studies with at least 3 years of follow-up evaluating the cardiovascular risk of WCH or WCE compared with normotension.

DATA EXTRACTION

2 investigators independently extracted study data and assessed study quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

27 studies were included, comprising 25 786 participants with untreated WCH or treated WCE and 38 487 with normal BP followed for a mean of 3 to 19 years. Compared with normotension, untreated WCH was associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.00]), all-cause mortality (HR, 1.33 [CI, 1.07 to 1.67]), and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.09 [CI, 1.23 to 4.48]); the risk for WCH was attenuated in studies that included stroke in the definition of cardiovascular events (HR, 1.26 [CI, 1.00 to 1.54]). No significant association was found between treated WCE and cardiovascular events (HR, 1.12 [CI, 0.91 to 1.39]), all-cause mortality (HR, 1.11 [CI, 0.89 to 1.46]), or cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.04 [CI, 0.65 to 1.66]). The findings persisted across several sensitivity analyses.

LIMITATION

Paucity of studies evaluating isolated cardiac outcomes or reporting participant race/ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

Untreated WCH, but not treated WCE, is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Out-of-office BP monitoring is critical in the diagnosis and management of hypertension.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

Masked Hypertension in CKD: Increased Prevalence and Risk for Cardiovascular and Renal Events

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are inextricably linked. The causal nature of the relationship is bidirectional. This relationship holds when blood pressure is assessed in the clinic and outside the clinic with home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Patients with CKD are more likely to have high-risk hypertension phenotypes, such as masked and sustained hypertension, and are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this review is to describe the increased prevalence of masked hypertension in patients with CKD and then describe the increased risk for target organ damage and adverse clinical events associated with masked hypertension in patients with CKD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of masked hypertension is greater in patients with CKD than that of the general population. Recent studies have demonstrated that masked hypertension is associated with increased risk for target organ damage including left ventricular hypertrophy, elevated pulse wave velocity, proteinuria, and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with CKD. Additionally, in patients with CKD, masked hypertension is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease, end-stage renal disease, and all-cause mortality. Patients with CKD are at increased risk for masked hypertension. Masked hypertension is associated with increased risk for target organ damage and adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with CKD. Further research is necessary to better understand the pathophysiology of masked hypertension, the optimal method for diagnosing masked hypertension, and to determine whether masked hypertension is a modifiable risk factor.

Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease: Novel Insights

Management of arterial hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a major challenge due to its high prevalence and associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CKD progression. Several clinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that aggressive treatment of hypertension in patients with and without CKD lowers the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality, nevertheless the effects of blood pressure (BP) lowering in terms of renal protection or harm remain controversial. Both home and ambulatory BP estimation have shown that patients with CKD display abnormal BP patterns outside of the office and further investigation is required, so as to compare the association of ambulatory versus office BP measurements with hard outcomes and adjust treatment strategies accordingly. Although renin-angiotensin system blockade appears to be beneficial in patients with advanced CKD, especially in the setting of proteinuria, discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibition should be considered in the setting of frequent episodes of acute kidney injury or hypotension while awaiting the results of ongoing trials. In light of the new evidence in favor of renal denervation in arterial hypertension, the indications and benefits of its application in individuals with CKD need to be clarified by future studies. Moreover, the clinical utility of the novel players in the pathophysiology of arterial hypertension and CKD, such as microRNAs and the gut microbiota, either as markers of disease or as therapeutic targets, remains a subject of intensive research.

Prognostic Value of Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension

The prognostic relevance of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) is incompletely clear, and its global impact on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis on the prognostic value of MUCH. We searched for articles assessing outcome in patients with MUCH compared with those with controlled hypertension (CH) and reporting adjusted hazard ratio and 95% CI. We identified 6 studies using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (12 610 patients with 933 events) and 5 using home blood pressure measurement (17 742 patients with 394 events). The global population included 30 352 patients who experienced 1327 events. Selected studies had cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality as primary outcome, and the main result is a composite of these events. The overall adjusted hazard ratio was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.57-2.06) for MUCH versus CH. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that adjusted hazard ratio was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.52-2.21) in studies using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and 1.75 (95% CI, 1.38-2.20) in those using home blood pressure measurement. Risk was significantly higher in MUCH than in CH independently of follow-up length and types of studied events. MUCH was at significantly higher risk than CH in all ethnic groups, but the highest hazard ratio was found in studies, including black patients. Risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality is significantly higher in patients with MUCH than in those with CH. MUCH detected by ambulatory or home blood pressure measurement seems to convey similar prognostic information.

Blood Pressure Pattern and Target Organ Damage in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

In patients with chronic kidney disease, data on blood pressure (BP) pattern and its association with target organ damage, which indicates elevated cardiovascular risk, are sparse. In 305 treated hypertensive chronic kidney disease patients, we assessed BP pattern, left ventricular mass (magnetic resonance imaging), intima-media thickness (ultrasound), 24-hour-pulse wave velocity and 24-hour-central augmentation index (Mobil-O-Graph). Controlled hypertension (normal office and ambulatory BP) was found in 41% and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (elevated office and ambulatory BP) in 30% of patients. Misclassification of BP status occurred in 29%: white coat uncontrolled hypertension (elevated office but normal ambulatory BP) was detected in 11% and masked uncontrolled hypertension (normal office but elevated ambulatory BP) in 18% of patients. Left ventricular mass was increased in white coat uncontrolled hypertension (+11.2 g), masked uncontrolled hypertension (+9.4 g), and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (+16.6 g) compared with controlled hypertension. Intima-media thickness was similar across all 4 BP groups. Twenty-four hour-pulse wave velocity and 24-hour-central augmentation index were increased in masked uncontrolled hypertension (+0.5 m/sec and +2.5%) and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (+0.5 m/sec and +2.9%) compared with controlled hypertension. In conclusion, based on office BP measurements, misclassification of true BP status occurred in almost one-third of chronic kidney disease patients. Both types of misclassification (white coat uncontrolled hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension) were associated with parameters of target organ damage. Ambulatory BP monitoring should be used routinely to identify chronic kidney disease patients at high cardiovascular risk.

Nocturnal pulse rate correlated with ambulatory blood pressure and target organ damage in patients with chronic kidney disease

The relationship between resting pulse rate (PR) and the occurrence of hypertension and cardiovascular (CV) mortality has been described in the general population. Few studies have examined the relationship between ambulatory PR, ambulatory blood pressure (BP), and target organ damage (TOD) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). A total of 1509 patients with CKD were recruited in our hospital. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) over a 24-hours period was performed and referenced with clinical data in this cross-sectional study. TOD was measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between PR, BP, and TOD. The percentage of male patients was 58.3% with a mean age of 44.6 ± 16.2 years. Nocturnal PR rather than 24-hours PR or daytime PR was an independent risk factor for clinical hypertension, 24-hours hypertension, BP dipper state, poor renal function, and LVH. In addition, the authors found that nighttime PR >74 beats/min (bpm) group was independently associated with clinical hypertension, 24-hours hypertension, day and night hypertension, nondipping BP, lower eGFR, and LVH when compared with nighttime PR <64 bpm group. Furthermore, 1:1 propensity score matching between PR ≤74 bpm group and PR >74 bpm group was performed. Multivariate analyses indicated nighttime PR >74 bpm remained independently associated with clinical hypertension, daytime and nighttime hypertension, and LVH. An increased nocturnal PR is associated with TOD, higher BP, and nondipping BP in patients with CKD.

BP Measurement Techniques: What They Mean for Patients with Kidney Disease

Patients with CKD typically have hypertension. Manual BP measurement in the office setting was used to define hypertension, establish eligibility, and assess BP targets in the epidemiologic studies and early randomized, controlled trials that inform current management of hypertension. Use of automated oscillometric devices has largely replaced manual BP measurement in the office and clinical trials. These newer devices may reduce the white coat effect and facilitate guideline-adherent measurement protocols. Obtaining BP measurements outside of the office with home and ambulatory BP monitoring is now more common. Out of office BPs are especially important in patients with CKD, because reduced GFR and proteinuria are associated with masked hypertension (normal office BP and elevated BP outside of the office), elevated nighttime BP, and abnormal diurnal variation in BP, all of which are associated with higher risk for target organ damage and adverse outcomes. Also, it is now feasible to routinely measure central BP and central hemodynamics. These measures are of greater importance to patients with CKD given the higher prevalence of increased sympathetic tone, arteriosclerosis, and inflammation as well as impaired sodium excretion and endothelial dysfunction, which lead to alterations in central BPs in this population. In this review, we describe various BP measurement techniques and how they apply to the care of patients with CKD.

Masked hypertension and kidney function decline: the Jackson Heart Study

BACKGROUND

Hypertension diagnosed by blood pressure (BP) measured in the clinic is associated with rapid kidney function decline (RKFD) and incident chronic kidney disease (CKD). The extent to which hypertension defined using out-of-clinic BP measurements is associated with these outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated the association of any masked hypertension (daytime SBP/DBP ≥ 135/85 mmHg, night-time SBP/DBP ≥ 120/70 mmHg or 24-h SBP/DBP ≥ 130/80 mmHg) with RKFD and incident CKD among 676 African-Americans in the Jackson Heart Study with clinic-measured SBP/DBP less than 140/90 mmHg who completed ambulatory BP monitoring in 2000-2004. RKFD was defined as a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at least 30% and incident CKD was defined as development of eGFR less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m with an at least 25% decline in eGFR between 2000-2004 and 2009-2013.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 57.6 years, 28.8% were men and 52.7% had any masked hypertension. After a median follow-up of 8 years, 13.8 and 8.6% of participants had RKFD and incident CKD, respectively. In unadjusted analyses, masked hypertension was associated with an increased odds for incident CKD [odds ratio (OR) 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22, 3.97]. This association remained statistically significant after adjustment for demographic characteristics, baseline eGFR and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.04, 3.67) but was eliminated after propensity score adjustment (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.87, 3.00). There was no association between masked hypertension and RKFD.

CONCLUSION

Masked hypertension may be associated with the development of CKD in African-Americans.

Prevalence and clinical outcomes of white-coat and masked hypertension: Analysis of a large ambulatory blood pressure database

The aim of this study was to analyze prevalence and clinical outcomes of the following clinical conditions: normotension (NT; clinic BP < 140/90 mm Hg; 24-hour BP < 130/80 mm Hg), white-coat hypertension (WCHT; clinic BP ≥ 140 and/or ≥90 mm Hg; 24-hour BP < 130/80 mm Hg), masked hypertension (MHT; clinic BP < 140/90 mm Hg; 24-hour BP ≥ 130 and/or ≥80 mm Hg), and sustained hypertension (SHT; clinic BP ≥ 140 and/or ≥90 mm Hg; 24-hour BP ≥ 130 and/or ≥80 mm Hg) in a large cohort of adult untreated individuals. Systematic research throughout the medical database of Regione Lazio (Italy) was performed to estimate incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and hospitalizations for HT and heart failure (HF). Among a total study sample of 2209 outpatients, 377 (17.1%) had NT, 351 (15.9%) had WCHT, 149 (6.7%) had MHT, and 1332 had (60.3%) SHT. During an average follow-up of 120.1 ± 73.9 months, WCHT was associated with increased risk of hospitalization for HT (OR 95% CI: 1.927 [1.233-3.013]; P = .04) and HF (OR 95% CI: 3.449 [1.321-9.007]; P = .011). MHT was associated with an increased risk of MI (OR 95% CI: 5.062 [2.218-11.550]; P < .001), hospitalization for HT (OR 95% CI: 2.553 [1.446-4.508]; P = .001), and for HF (OR 95% CI: 4.214 [1.449-12.249]; P = .008). These effects remained statistically significant event after corrections for confounding factors including age, BMI, gender, smoking, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, and presence of antihypertensive therapies.