Impact of dapagliflozin on cardiac function following anterior myocardial infarction in non-diabetic patients - DACAMI (a randomized controlled clinical trial)

Early prescription of SGLT2i for acute patient care: from current evidence to future directions

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have emerged as transformative therapies in the management of chronic heart failure (HF), offering substantial reductions in mortality and hospitalizations. Beyond their initial classification as diuretics, SGLT2i exert a spectrum of cardioprotective effects that extend far beyond renal modulation. By activating autophagic pathways and mimicking a starvation-like state, SGLT2i enhance cellular bioenergetics and mitigate acute injury, potentially underpinning both their immediate and sustained cardiometabolic benefits when administered early in acute care settings. In acute decompensated HF, early initiation of SGLT2i enhances clinical decongestion by increasing diuresis, improving diuretic efficiency, and mitigating diuretic resistance, translating to shorter hospitalizations and reduced readmissions and mortality. In acute myocardial infarction, SGLT2i reduce the incidence of first and total HF hospitalizations, arrhythmic events, adverse cardiac remodelling, and contrast-induced acute kidney injury, while mitigating stent failure and atherosclerotic progression. Furthermore, they demonstrated efficacy in preventing new-onset and recurrent supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. However, the evidence remains inconclusive regarding their impact on sudden cardiac death or outcomes following cardiac arrest. In critically ill patients, SGLT2i use is associated with reduced rates of acute kidney injury and the need for renal replacement therapy, with promising implications for the management of sepsis and multi-organ dysfunction. Importantly, adverse effects such as renal impairment, electrolyte disturbances, acid-base imbalances, urinary tract infections, and dysglycemia appear infrequently in this population. This narrative review synthesizes the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, current clinical evidence, and potential future applications of early SGLT2i therapy in acute care settings, providing insights into their expanding role in contemporary cardiovascular medicine.

Impact of sodium-glucose transport protein-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on the inflammasome pathway in acute myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comprehensive review

Sodium-glucose transport protein-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, initially developed for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), have emerged as potential cardioprotective agents, reducing cardiovascular mortality and improving heart failure outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors exert anti-inflammatory effects, particularly through modulating the inflammasome pathway. This review explores the role of the inflammasome in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in T2DM and discusses the mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors influence this pathway. We evaluate current studies on the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on key inflammatory mediators, particularly the NLRP3 inflammasome, and discuss their potential therapeutic implications for reducing inflammation and myocardial injury in patients with T2DM experiencing AMI. In summary, the key novelties in this review lie in its focused mechanistic approach on the inflammasome pathway, its integration of diabetes and cardiovascular research, and its potential to influence future therapeutic strategies for AMI in T2DM patients. It offers a novel angle by tying together molecular mechanisms of inflammation with clinical implications in a specific patient population that faces high cardiovascular risk.

Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitor in Patients with Diabetes with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the treatment of patients with diabetes with newly diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, cohort study included 1161 patients with diabetes with newly diagnosed AMI. The primary endpoint events included rehospitalization for heart failure (HF) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The secondary endpoint events were recurrent MI and cardiac death.

RESULTS

Patients were categorized into the SGLT2i group and the non-SGLT2i group. During a median follow-up of 1.8 (1.5-2.3) years, the risk of hospitalization for HF (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.36-0.94; P = 0.026) and MACEs (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.40-0.86; P = 0.006) were lower in the SGLT2i group, with a similar trend observed for cardiac death (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27-0.99; P = 0.046). SGLT2i appears to be a better choice for all such patients. However, our research further found the above trends were observed mainly in the LVEF < 50% subgroup. In addition, our study also revealed novel findings that the protective effect of SGLT2i was not altered by baseline levels of HbA1c in these patients, nor by different SGLT2i medications.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of the current investigation suggest that SGLT2i is preferred as a hypoglycemic and cardiovascular protective drug for patients with diabetes with newly diagnosed AMI. It could improve cardiovascular outcomes, reducing the risk of rehospitalization for HF and MACEs, particularly in patients with reduced LVEF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Role of SGLT2I in Patients with Myocardial Infarction, NCT06245980. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06245980 . Retrospectively registered.

SGLT2 inhibitors across the acute cardiac care spectrum: insights and perspectives

This review examines the evolving role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in acute cardiac care. Originally developed as antidiabetic agents, SGLT2i have demonstrated significant and early benefits in chronic heart failure by reducing hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality across all the ejection fraction spectrum. Recent evidence now suggests that these agents may also offer advantages in acute settings, including acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and post - acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Several clinical trials have explored early SGLT2i initiation during hospitalization, reporting improvements in diuretic efficiency, cardiac biomarkers, and favorable remodeling, without notable safety concerns. The present review discusses the multifaceted mechanisms underlying these benefits, which include osmotic diuresis, modulation of neurohormonal activation, anti-inflammatory effects, and direct myocardial protection. Together, these actions not only facilitate decongestion and renal preservation but also enhance cardiac energetics. Current data are promising and support a pivotal role of a SGLT2i as a therapeutic strategy in the whole acute cardiac care setting for their short and long-term benefit. Future research is essential to validate these findings and refine the best patients to be treated with early SGLT2i implementation in the acute cardiac care spectrum.

Safety and efficacy of early initiation of sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors 2 in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

Data on the early use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with acute heart failure (HF) are conflicting, and mostly evaluating soft endpoints (i.e., indices of congestion, renal function, ejection fraction, and diuresis). The aim was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess their impact after an HF decompensation event.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two electronic databases were screened for eligible studies. Efficacy endpoints were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, length of hospital stay, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (nt-proBNP). Safety endpoints included acute kidney injury (AKI), volume depletion, ketoacidosis, hypotension, hypoglycemia, non-cardiovascular death, urinary tract infection, genital infections, serious adverse events (AE), and AE leading to treatment discontinuation. Two pre-specified subgroup analyses were planned according to the specific SGLT2i and clinical setting [i.e., acute myocardial infarction (MI) versus non-acute MI]. 16 RCTs enrolling 15,073 patients were considered. Early initiation of SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of HF hospitalizations [Risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95 % Confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.87], AKI (RR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.59-0.99), and nt-proBNP levels (MD -354 pg/mL). No significant difference was detected for any of the other endpoints. In the pre-specified subgroup analysis, a significant interaction was found between the SGLT2i type and the risk of AKI, in favor of empagliflozin.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients recently hospitalized for acute HF, early administration of SGLT2i was associated with fewer readmissions for HF and AKI, as well as decongestant effects, without raising any safety concern.

Emerging horizons: clinical applications and multifaceted benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors beyond diabetes

SGLT-2 inhibitors, initially developed for type 2 diabetes, demonstrate profound cardiorenal and metabolic benefits. This review synthesizes evidence from clinical trials and mechanistic studies to elucidate their roles in cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Key findings include a notable reduction in cardiovascular death/heart failure hospitalization, a marked decrease in heart failure hospitalization risk, and significant improvements in renal and hepatic outcomes. Emerging mechanisms, such as autophagy induction, ketone utilization, and anti-inflammatory effects, underpin these benefits. Ongoing trials explore their potential in non-diabetic populations, positioning SGLT-2 inhibitors as transformative agents in multisystem disease management.

Effects of new hypoglycemic drugs on patients with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no relevant study comparing sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor (DPP4i) head to head to evaluate their comprehensive impact on heart failure patients.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases. Utilizing the risk of bias tool from the Cochrane Collaboration, the methodological quality of included studies was critically assessed and potential publication bias was examined via funnel plots.

RESULTS

All results are presented as mean difference; 95% confidence interval (MD; 95% CI). The network meta-analysis indicated that in regards to left ventricular function, there is a big difference in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of Empagliflozin 25 mg (13.64; 0.26, 27.01) compared to Canagliflozin 100 mg; and significant differences in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) of Dapagliflozin 10 mg (-0.76; -1.27, -0.25 and -0.95; -1.86, -0.05), Vildagliptin 50 mg (-1.05; -1.47, -0.63 and -1.12; -2.19, -0.05), and Sitagliptin 100 mg (-1.34; -2.31, -0.38 and -1.89; -3.50, -0.27) compared to Empagliflozin 10 mg. In terms of the quality of life, there are significant differences in the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and the Quality of life score of Sitagliptin 100 mg (408.08; 213.59, 602.57 and 3.74; 1.57, 5.92) compared to Dapagliflozin 5 mg. In terms of the cardiovascular outcome events, there is a significant difference in the heart failure rehospitalization rate of Dapagliflozin 10 mg (0.45; 0.25, 0.82) and Empagliflozin 10 mg (0.48; 0.28, 0.81) compared to Liraglutide 1.8 mg. Further significant differences are found in the all-cause mortality of Dapagliflozin 10 mg (0.81; 0.66, 0.98) compared to Vildagliptin 50 mg; the cardiovascular death of Albiglutide 30 mg (0.49; 0.28, 0.86) compared to Exenatide 2 mg; and the arrhythmic events of Liraglutide 1.8 mg (0.49; 0.26, 0.90) compared to Empagliflozin 10 mg. The network meta-analysis of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, and DPP4i as a class of drugs showed that GLP-1RA is superior to SGLT2i in improving LVEF and reducing myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome, whereas DPP4i is superior to SGLT2i in improving LVEDV and LVESV.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1RA is superior to SGLT2i in improving LVEF and reducing myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome, whereas DPP4i is superior to SGLT2i in improving LVEDV and LVESV. Key message What is already known on this topic-It has been confirmed that three new hypoglycemic drugs have a protective effect on the cardiovascular system. Studies have shown that sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) can improve cardiovascular outcomes and enhance the quality of life of heart failure patients. Currently, SGLT2i is widely used in the clinical treatment of heart failure, and related studies have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor (DPP4i) also play important roles in the treatment of heart failure. What this study adds-However, there is no relevant research on whether these drugs' clinical efficacy is dose-dependent. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy-This study included different doses of hypoglycemic drugs and used a network meta-analysis method to comprehensively evaluate the effects of three hypoglycemic drugs on heart function, quality of life, and prognosis in heart failure patients, providing a basis for clinical practice.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a specific class of drugs originally developed for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. Subsequently, studies demonstrated that their action was not limited to glycemic control but could also have positive effects on other specific outcomes, particularly at the cardiovascular level. Indeed, due to their diuretic effect, SGLT2i improve the clinical control of chronic heart failure and reduce the risk of rehospitalization. In addition, other studies reported a protective effect on major cardiovascular events and mortality. More recently, it has been suggested that the prescription of SGLT2i after an acute myocardial infarction may have positive effects due to their possible effect on inflammation, arrhythmias, and ventricular remodeling. Here, we reviewed studies focused on SGLT2i after an acute myocardial infarction in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in myocardial infarction patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are known to improve cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with heart failure (HF), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, their efficacy following myocardial infarction (MI) remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov. Primary outcomes included hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular (CV) death, a composite of HHF or CV death, all-cause death, major cardiovascular events (MACE), recurrent MI, severe arrhythmia, renal injury and stroke. Secondary outcomes targeted improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies comprising 22 370 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that SGLT2 inhibitors reduced HHF (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.78, p < 0.001), combined HHF or CV death (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99, p = 0.028), all-cause mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93, p = 0.002), MACE (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88, p = 0.004), recurrent MI (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.94, p = 0.007), severe arrhythmia (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.85, p = 0.009) and renal injury (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.87, p = 0.002). Improvement in LVEF (MD 3.96%, 95% CI 2.52 to 5.40; p < 0.001) and LVEDV (MD -5.52 mL, 95% CI -10.21 to -0.83; p = 0.021) was notably greater in the SGLT2 inhibitors group.

CONCLUSIONS

In post-MI patients, we first found that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly lowered the risk of HHF, combined CV death or HHF, all-cause death, MACE, recurrent MI, severe arrhythmias and renal injury. Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors improved LVEF and LVEDV.

AlBarakat M, Elewidi M, Abuelazm M, Turkmani M, Abdelazeem B, Laeeq R. The effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce cardiovascular events, especially in diabetic patients. However, the cardioprotective effects of early SGLT2i administration following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the impact of SGLT2is on clinical outcomes in patients post-AMI.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL, WOS, Scopus, and EMBASE up to April 2024. Risk ratio (RR) was used for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Seven studies with 11,407 patients were included. SGLT2is did not significantly reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.68, 1.29], p = 0.69), all-cause mortality (RR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.84, 1.21], p = 0.93), or stroke (RR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.29,1.28], p = 0.19). However, SGLT2is significantly reduced the risk of heart failure (RR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.63, 0.91], p < 0.01) and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (MD = 1.86, 95% CI [1.58, 2.14], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In post-AMI patients, SGLT2is do not significantly affect MACE or mortality but are associated with reduced heart failure risk and improved ejection fraction.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO identifier number: CRD42024506806.

Efficacy and Safety of SGLT-2 Inhibitors in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Since there is no specific recommendation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction (MI), this systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to address this lack of evidence. Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until May 30, 2024. We used both random and fixed-effects models for data analyses. Odds ratio (OR) and standard means difference (SMD) were performed for binary and continuous variables, respectively. Nine studies including five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and four observational studies including 15,595 individuals with acute MI were entered. Overall, SGLT-2 inhibitors are significantly associated with a reduction of hospitalization for heart failure (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.97; P =  .02; I2 = 0%) and all-cause mortality (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.81; P =  .002; I2 = 0%) based on the RCTs and observational studies, respectively. SGLT-2 inhibitors also significantly improved the left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.70; P =  .04; I2 = 62%) among RCTs. Further evaluation of these drugs also revealed an acceptable safety profile without any major adverse events. In conclusion, although SGLT-2 inhibitors may have some clinical benefits among acute MI individuals, further RCTs are still needed to provide robust evidence regarding the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in this setting.

Impact of sodium‒glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with recent versus previous myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sodium‒glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been included in heart failure (HF) guidelines because of their benefits in reducing mortality and hospitalization rates. However, the timing and benefits of initiating SGLT2 inhibitors in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) remain controversial. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo in patients with MI.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with recent or previous MI. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase for RCTs comparing SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo in patients with MI. The primary outcome was (1) HF hospitalization. In this analysis, we also included the following secondary outcomes: (2) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke; and (3) all-cause mortality. A subgroup analysis was conducted for the primary outcome, comparing patients who had experienced an MI more than 8 weeks prior to study enrolment (previous MI) versus those who had experienced an MI within the preceding 8 weeks (acute MI). Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random effects model.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 10 RCTs comprising 22,266 patients, of whom 11,339 (51.2%) had type 2 diabetes. The mean age was 62 years, and the median follow-up was 21 months. According to the pooled analysis, HF hospitalization rates were lower in patients on SGLT2 inhibitors compared with placebo (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69, 0.85; p < 0.001)). Differences in MACE were also observed in favor of SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79, 0.97; p = 0.012). There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between the groups (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78, 1.00; p = 0.058). Benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors for the primary outcome were consistent regardless of the timing of last MI, with no treatment by subgroup interaction (p for interaction = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of patients who experienced MI, the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with lower rates of hospitalization for HF. In addition, the treatment effect of SGLT2 inhibitors was consistent regardless of whether they were started in the recent versus previous MI setting.

Association of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors with mortality across the spectrum of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on mortality following myocardial infarction (MI) remains uncertain. Additionally, the role of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF) in modulating the effectiveness of these drugs post-MI are not fully understood. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association of SGLT2 inhibitors with all-cause mortality in post-MI patients and to explore key moderators influencing this benefit.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for randomized controlled trials (RTCs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) observational studies assessing SGLT2 inhibitors' impact on post-MI mortality. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We pooled hazard ratios (HRs) to estimate the intervention's effect on the overall population and stratified studies into early (SGLT2 inhibitors administered within eight weeks post-MI) and delayed treatment trials. Meta-regression assessed the moderating effects of T2DM and HF.

RESULTS

 A total of five RCTs and four PSM observational studies involving 26,753 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.9 [10.5] years; 6,406 female [24.0%]; 16,369 T2DM [61.2%]; 13,933 HF [52.1%]) were included. Early and delayed treatment trials comprised 16,165 (60.4%) and 10,588 (39.6%) patients, respectively. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced all-cause mortality following MI (HR 0.79, 95% CI [0.68, 0.91]; p = 0.001; I2 = 59%). Stratified analysis demonstrated consistent effects in both early (HR 0.76, 95% CI [0.59, 0.98]; p = 0.03; I2 = 65%) and delayed (HR 0.81, 95% CI [0.67, 0.98]; p = 0.03; I2 = 60%) treatment. Meta-regression identified T2DM as a significant moderator of the mortality benefit (β = - 0.0049; p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, early and delayed treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors following MI was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. Furthermore, the presence of T2DM was associated with a greater mortality reduction, while HF was not significantly associated with the outcome.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is on the rise globally, with ischemic heart disease being the leading cause of mortality and morbidity. While sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure, evidence is limited in guiding initiation in post-acute myocardial infarction (post-AMI) patients. Hence, this study aimed to appraise the current literature on the effect of SGLT2i on the clinical outcomes of post-AMI patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted up to 1 May 2024. Only randomized controlled trials studying the use of SGLT2i in post-AMI patients were included. We included adult patients aged 18 years old and older diagnosed with AMI and initiated on SGLT2i in the acute post-AMI setting. SGLT2i studies solely in heart failure settings were excluded.

RESULTS

Eight clinical trials were included in the systematic review, comprising 11,436 patients. Compared with placebo, SGLT2i initiation in post-AMI patients significantly reduced total number of heart failure hospitalizations (risk ratio [RR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.90) and was associated with a lower N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level (- 26.67 pg/ml, 95% CI - 41.74 to - 11.59). There was no difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81-1.28), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.83-1.28), change in left ventricular ejection fraction, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

SGLT2i use in patients with AMI was associated with a reduction in heart failure hospitalizations and a decrease in NT-proBNP. There were no significant differences in mortality outcomes.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO identifier number CRD42024540843.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus placebo, initiated within the hospitalization period, in addition to habitual treatment, for treating adult patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We also conducted subgroup analysis by diabetes mellitus (DM) status and type of AMI. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HF). The secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and serious adverse events (AEs). We pooled risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for binary outcomes. The between-study variance was assessed using tau2 statistics. We included five RCTs, encompassing 11,211 patients. SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for HF compared to placebo (RR 0.73; 95% CI [0.61, 0.88]). However, the risk of all-cause death (RR 1.05; 95% CI [0.78, 1.41]) and cardiovascular death (RR 1.04; 95% CI [0.84, 1.29]) was similar between the groups, as well as the risk of serious AEs (RR 1.01; 95% CI [0.90, 1.14]). In the subgroup analysis by DM status and type of AMI, there were no significant subgroup differences for the outcomes of hospitalization for HF and all-cause death. In patients with AMI, treatment with SGLT2i is safe and significantly reduces the risk of hospitalization for HF, but it has no impact on all-cause death and cardiovascular death compared to placebo.

Effect of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on all cause death and rehospitalization for heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction

The impact of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) on reducing the risk of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of SGLT2-i on all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for HF in patients diagnosed with AMI. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for relevant studies published up to May 2024, following the PICOS principle. Eligible studies included randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing SGLT2-i with placebo regarding all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for HF, cardiovascular mortality, and the incidence of nonfatal MI in AMI patients. Patient-level data from each trial were synthesized into a pooled dataset and analyzed using a mixed-effects or random-effects model based on the I2 statistic. Ten clinical trials enrolling 15,748 participants (6913 in the SGLT2-i group and 8835 in the placebo group) were included. The follow-up duration ranged from 12 weeks to 2.1 years. SGLT2-i significantly reduced rehospitalization for HF (RR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.81, P < 0.00001, I2 = 39%) compared to placebo. However, SGLT2-i did not significantly reduce the risk of all-cause death (RR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-1.00, P = 0.05, I2 = 46%), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.18, P = 0.67, I2 = 24%) or nonfatal MI (RR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-1.14, P = 0.16, I2 = 64%) during follow-up. Compared to placebo, SGLT2-i significantly reduced rehospitalization for HF in patients with AMI, but did not reduce the risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death and nonfatal MI.

Dapagliflozin Effects on Cardiac Deformation in Heart Failure and Secondary Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess potential effects of dapagliflozin in nondiabetic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) on cardiac function assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE).

METHODS

This randomized, prospective, single-center, open-label trial compared consecutive nondiabetic outpatients with HFrEF or HFmrEF receiving dapagliflozin with patients treated with optimal medical therapy (OMT) except sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors. Primary endpoint was the presence of a significant modification of left ventricular global longitudinal strain, diastolic function (as peak atrial longitudinal strain) and right ventricular function by STE from baseline to 6 months. Cardiovascular events and parameters of congestion were assessed as safety-exploratory endpoints.

RESULTS

Overall, 88 patients (38% HFmrEF) were enrolled and randomized to start dapagliflozin on top of OMT (n = 44) or to continue with OMT (n = 44). All STE values improved in the dapagliflozin group after 6 months, whereas there was a nonsignificant improvement in OMT group. Moreover, when comparing the modification of STE parameters at follow-up in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF, only the main treatment effect resulted statistically significant in both groups (P < 0.0001), indicating a significant difference between dapagliflozin and OMT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided randomized data on the beneficial effect of dapagliflozin in nondiabetic patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF in terms of myocardial performance measured by the most sensitive echocardiographic technique, ie, STE. This suggests its usefulness for left ventricular reverse remodeling and better quality of life in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF. (Effects of Dapagliflozin on cardiac deformation and clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction [DAPA ECHO trial]; EudraCT number: 2021-005394-66).

Protective Mechanisms of SGLTi in Ischemic Heart Disease

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a common clinical cardiovascular disease with high morbidity and mortality. Sodium glucose cotransporter protein inhibitor (SGLTi) is a novel hypoglycemic drug. To date, both clinical trials and animal experiments have shown that SGLTi play a protective role in IHD, including myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). The protective effects may be involved in mechanisms of energy metabolic conversion, anti-inflammation, anti-fibrosis, ionic homeostasis improvement, immune cell development, angiogenesis and functional regulation, gut microbiota regulation, and epicardial lipids. Thus, this review summarizes the above mechanisms and aims to provide theoretical evidence for therapeutic strategies for IHD.

Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with or without Type 2 diabetes and heart failure (HF). However, studies have shown conflicting evidence regarding their efficacy in patients following acute myocardial infarction (MI). We conducted a pilot systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in MI.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Embase databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared clinical outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo following MI. We conducted the statistical analysis using RevMan, version 5.4 and pooled risk ratios (RRs) along the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Five RCTs reporting data for 11,211 patients were included in our study. The mean follow-up duration was 43.8 weeks. Our pooled analysis showed that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of hospitalisations for heart failure (HHF) (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88, p = 0.001) in patients with MI. However, the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.78-1.41, p = 0.76), CV mortality (RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.84-1.29, p = 0.73) and all-cause hospitalisations (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.96-1.17, p = 0.25) remained comparable across the two groups.

CONCLUSION

SGLT2 inhibitors reduce HHF without affecting all-cause mortality, CV mortality and all-cause hospitalisations. However, further evidence is required to reach a definitive conclusion.

Effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level and structural changes following myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are anti-hyperglycemic drugs and have been proven to have cardiovascular protective effects for patients with heart failure regardless of their diabetes status. However, the benefit of SGLT2i following myocardial infarction (MI) remains incompletely established. This review aimed to investigate the impact of SGLT2i on NT-proBNP levels and structural changes post-MI.

METHOD

Medline, ClinicalTrial.gov, Scopus, and Directory of open-access journals were searched to retrieve the relevant articles. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that assessed NT-proBNP and cardiac structural changes in patients who received SGLT2i compared to placebo following MI. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality.

RESULT

Four studies were included in this review, including patients with and without diabetes. While two studies showed no marked decrease from the baseline in NT-proBNP levels between the SGLT2i group and the control group, two studies reported a substantial reduction. The meta-analysis included three of these studies, with a total of 238 participants. The meta-analysis did not find a statistically significant drop in NT-proBNP levels post-MI in the SGLT2 inhibitors group compared to placebo (pooled SMD = 0.16, 95% CI 0.57-0.26, P 0.45). Furthermore, different echocardiographic parameters were reported in the included trials, yet no meta-analysis could be conducted to assess the influence of SGLT2i on cardiac remodeling post-MI.

CONCLUSION

SGLT2i did not result in a statistically significant reduction of NT-proBNP level subsequent to myocardial infarction. A knowledge gap exists regarding the impact of these agents on cardiac remodeling post-MI. Future high-quality clinical trials are needed to provide more robust evidence.

Empagliflozin to prevent progressive adverse remodelling after myocardial infarction (EMPRESS-MI): rationale and design

AIMS

Patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) are at risk of progressive adverse cardiac remodelling that can lead to the development of heart failure and death. The early addition of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor to standard treatment may delay or prevent progressive adverse remodelling in these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

EMpagliflozin to PREvent worSening of left ventricular volumes and Systolic function after Myocardial Infarction (EMPRESS-MI) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial designed to assess the effect of empagliflozin on cardiac remodelling evaluated using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in 100 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction following MI. Eligible patients were those ≥12 h and ≤14 days following acute MI, with an LVEF <45% by CMR. Patients were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg once a day or matching placebo. The primary outcome will be change in left ventricular end-systolic volume indexed to body surface area over 24 weeks from randomization. Secondary endpoints include measures of left ventricular and atrial volumes, left ventricular mass, LVEF, and circulating cardiac biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

EMPRESS-MI will assess the effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on cardiac remodelling in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after an acute MI.

Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have revealed the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in heart failure patients. However, their effects on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of SGLT2i in patients with AMI with or without diabetes. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library encompassing data from inception until November 30, 2023. Relevant studies comparing SGLT2i with placebo or non-SGLT2i in patients with AMI were included. The mean difference and/or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using a fixed-effects model when the heterogeneity statistic (I2) was less than 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was employed. Four randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies involving 9397 patients with AMI were included in this meta-analysis. Patients treated with SGLT2i exhibited a significantly lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.80) and all-cause death (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.95) compared with those treated with placebo or non-SGLT2i. Furthermore, the use of SGLT2i was associated with a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.62-2.17) and a greater reduction of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94). Subgroup analysis revealed that in patients with diabetes, SGLT2i exhibited similar effects. The present meta-analysis provided evidence indicating the effectiveness of SGLT2i in patients with AMI; SGLT2i may serve as an additional therapeutic option for patients with AMI, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes.

Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

The evidence for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes or chronic heart failure was sufficient but lacking in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our aim was to investigate the effects of SGLT2i on cardiovascular outcomes in ACS patients. Studies of SGLT2i selection in ACS patients were searched and pooled. Outcomes included all-cause death, adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac remodeling as measured by the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD), cardiac function as assessed by the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and NT-proBNP, and glycemic control. Twenty-four studies with 12,413 patients were identified. Compared to the group without SGLT2i, SGLT2i showed benefits in reducing all-cause death (OR 0.72, 95% CI [0.61, 0.85]), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 0.44, 95% CI [0.30, 0.64]), cardiovascular death (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.54, 0.81]), heart failure (OR 0.52, 95% CI [0.44, 0.62]), myocardial infarction (OR 0.68, 95% CI [0.56, 0.83]), angina pectoris (OR 0.37, 95% CI [0.17, 0.78]), and stroke (OR 0.48, 95% CI [0.24, 0.96]). Results favored SGLT2i for LVEDD (MD -2.03, 95% CI [-3.29, -0.77]), LVEF (MD 3.22, 95% CI [1.71, 4.72]), and NT-proBNP (MD -171.53, 95% CI [-260.98, -82.08]). Thus, SGLT2i treatment reduces the risk of all-cause death and MACE and improves cardiac remodeling and function in ACS patients.

SGLT2 inhibitors: Beyond glycemic control

Multiple randomized controlled trials have extensively examined the therapeutic effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, ushering in a transformative approach to treating individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Notably, emerging reports have drawn attention to the potential positive impacts of SGLT2 inhibitors in nondiabetic patients. In an effort to delve into this phenomenon, a comprehensive systematic literature review spanning PubMed (NLM), Medline (Ovid), and Cochrane Library, covering publications from 2000 to 2024 was undertaken. This systematic review encompassed twenty-six randomized control trials (RCTs) involving 35,317 participants. The findings unveiled a multifaceted role for SGLT2 inhibitors, showcasing their ability to enhance metabolic control and yield cardioprotective effects through a reduction in cardiovascular death (CVD) and hospitalization related to heart failure (HF). Additionally, a renalprotective effect was observed, evidenced by a slowdown in chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and a decrease in albuminuria. Importantly, these benefits were coupled with an acceptable safety profile. The literature also points to various biological plausibility and underlying mechanistic pathways, offering insights into the association between SGLT2 inhibitors and these positive outcomes in nondiabetic individuals. Current research trends indicate a continual exploration of additional role for SGLT2 inhibitors in. Nevertheless, further research is imperative to fully elucidate the mechanisms and long-term outcomes associated with the nondiabetic use of SGLT2 inhibitors.

The Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Coronary Revascularization: Where Are We Now? A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes and coronary artery disease are two common conditions that often co-exist. In recent years, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been demonstrated to provide significant cardioprotective benefits, especially among patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review, we look to identify the outcomes SGLT2i use in patients undergoing coronary revascularization.

METHODS

Pubmed and Embase were systematically searched for articles describing the outcomes of patients taking SGLT2i and undergoing coronary revascularization. 834 titles and abstracts were screened, 42 full texts were reviewed, and 18 studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria and were included in this review.

RESULTS

For patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention, the use of SGLT2i resulted in reductions in mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, and improved blood glucose; however, these benefits were not consistently reported in the literature. Reduced inflammatory markers and positive cardiac remodeling were identified among patients taking SGLT2i.

CONCLUSIONS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been demonstrated to provide benefits for patients with heart failure along with a host of positive modulatory effects on the cardiovascular system, including reductions in inflammatory properties, hypertension, and left ventricular volume load. Given the clear benefit provided by SGLT2i to patients with cardiovascular disease and a host of positive properties that are expected to be protective for patients with ischemic heart disease, future investigation into the relationship between SGLT2i and outcomes for patients undergoing revascularization is imperative.

Empagliflozin and colchicine in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized, double-blinded, three-arm parallel-group, controlled trial

PURPOSE

There is accumulating evidence regarding the potential benefits of empagliflozin in individuals with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Based on the literature, colchicine could also reduce the risk of MI and death in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, trials investigating the effects of the combination of empagliflozin with colchicine and high-dose empagliflozin monotherapy in this setting are lacking.

METHODS

In this trial, 106 non-diabetic participants with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following recent ST-elevation MI were randomly assigned to empagliflozin 10 mg/day, empagliflozin 10 mg/day plus colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily, or empagliflozin 25 mg/day groups within 72 h after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The study's primary outcomes were the changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) over 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of individuals were statistically similar between the study groups. Changes in NYHA functional class over 12 weeks were not significantly different between the study groups. hs-CRP was significantly reduced in all groups (all P < 0.001); however, there was no significant change between the groups over the study period. Changes in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), LVEF, and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) during the research period did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that neither the combination treatment of empagliflozin 10 mg/day with colchicine nor the monotherapy of empagliflozin 25 mg/day was superior to empagliflozin 10 mg/day in terms of changes in clinical, inflammatory, and echocardiographic outcome parameters in patients with recent MI with reduced LVEF over 3 months. Further studies are warranted to confirm the findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial ID: IRCT20111206008307N39. Registration date: 27 October 2022. https://www.irct.ir/trial/66216.

SGLT2 Inhibitors' Cardiovascular Benefits in Individuals Without Diabetes, Heart Failure, and/or Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

Despite the growing body of evidence regarding the beneficial cardiovascular effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, clinical data in individuals without diabetes, heart failure (HF), and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD) is limited. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, from database inception until May 4, 2023, to explore new evidence of SGLT2 inhibitors' cardiovascular benefits in individuals without diabetes, HF, and/or CKD. A total of 1156 individuals from 14 studies (13 randomized controlled trials and 1 nonrandomized study) were included. The results showed the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors on blood pressure, weight, and body mass index in this population with an acceptable safety profile. The current evidence supports the potential role of SGLT2 inhibitors as primary prevention in individuals without diabetes, HF, and/or CKD. This review may shed light on the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in conditions such as stage A HF and metabolic syndrome. The literature trend is going toward uncovering SGLT2 inhibitors' role in stage B HF, different types of myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrhythmias.