A comparison between independent nurse prescribing and patient group directions in the safety and appropriateness of medication provision in United Kingdom sexual health services: A mixed methods study

Attitudes of the public and medical professionals toward nurse prescribing: A text-mining study based on social medias

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the public and medical professionals' concerns and attitudes toward nurse prescribing using text-mining method to analyze social media data.

Methods

Python was used to automatically mine data related to the keywords "nurse prescribing" and "prescription" that were posted on four Chinese internet platforms between January 1, 2017, and November 1, 2022. The four Chinese internet platforms included social media sites such as Zhihu and Weibo, as well as medical forums like Aiaiyi Medical Hotspot and Dingxiangyuan Medicine. We conducted personnel, topic, and sentiment analysis techniques using SnowNLP, Bayesian Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), and BosonNLP. Finally, we conducted content analysis using Nvivo 11 based on the results of the topic and sentiment analysis to obtain comprehensive and insightful results.

Results

We acquired 2,823 comments totaling 92,859 words on the four Internet platforms to conduct analysis. The analyze result showed that many public and medical professionals held a negative attitude toward nurse prescribing, and few had a prudent positive attitude. The public is concerned about the impact of nurse prescribing on medical professionals and the competency requirements for nurses. Medical professionals are concerned about the current and future status of nurse prescribing in China and the difficulties in implementing nurse prescribing.

Conclusion

Nurses should gradually gain recognition for their expertise and win the acceptance of the public and medical professionals on their ability of nursing prescribing by striving to enhance their professional capacity and self-authorization capabilities. Nurse administrators and educators need to recognize the advantages of nurse prescribing and address the challenges and issues in its implementation through promoting legislation, education, and heightening public awareness of its benefits.

Design, delivery and effectiveness of health practitioner regulation systems: an integrative review

BACKGROUND

Health practitioner regulation (HPR) systems are increasingly recognized as playing an important role in supporting health workforce availability, accessibility, quality, and sustainability, while promoting patient safety. This review aimed to identify evidence on the design, delivery and effectiveness of HPR to inform policy decisions.

METHODS

We conducted an integrative analysis of literature published between 2010 and 2021. Fourteen databases were systematically searched, with data extracted and synthesized based on a modified Donabedian framework.

FINDINGS

This large-scale review synthesized evidence from a range of academic (n = 410) and grey literature (n = 426) relevant to HPR. We identified key themes and findings for a series of HPR topics organized according to our structures-processes-outcomes conceptual framework. Governance reforms in HPR are shifting towards multi-profession regulators, enhanced accountability, and risk-based approaches; however, comparisons between HPR models were complicated by a lack of a standardized HPR typology. HPR can support government workforce strategies, despite persisting challenges in cross-border recognition of qualifications and portability of registration. Scope of practice reform adapted to modern health systems can improve access and quality. Alternatives to statutory registration for lower-risk health occupations can improve services and protect the public, while standardized evaluation frameworks can aid regulatory strengthening. Knowledge gaps remain around the outcomes and effectiveness of HPR processes, including continuing professional development models, national licensing examinations, accreditation of health practitioner education programs, mandatory reporting obligations, remediation programs, and statutory registration of traditional and complementary medicine practitioners.

CONCLUSION

We identified key themes, issues, and evidence gaps valuable for governments, regulators, and health system leaders. We also identified evidence base limitations that warrant caution when interpreting and generalizing the results across jurisdictions and professions. Themes and findings reflect interests and concerns in high-income Anglophone countries where most literature originated. Most studies were descriptive, resulting in a low certainty of evidence. To inform regulatory design and reform, research funders and governments should prioritize evidence on regulatory outcomes, including innovative approaches we identified in our review. Additionally, a systematic approach is needed to track and evaluate the impact of regulatory interventions and innovations on achieving health workforce and health systems goals.

Independent nurse medication provision: A mixed method study assessing impact on patients' experience, processes, and costs in sexual health clinics

BACKGROUND

Local services in the United Kingdom National Health Service enable autonomous provision of medication by nurses, supporting individual nurses to gain prescribing qualifications or by introducing local patient group directions.

AIM

To compare nurse prescribing and patient group directions about clinic processes, patients' experiences, and costs from the perspectives of providers, nurses, and patients.

DESIGN

Mixed methods, comparative case study in five urban sexual health services in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

Data were collected from nurse prescribers, patient group direction users and their patients July 2015 to December 2016. Nurse questionnaires explored training (funding and methods). Nurses recorded consultation durations and support from other professionals in clinical diaries. Patient notes were reviewed to explore medication provision, appropriateness and safety; errors were judged by an expert panel. Patients completed satisfaction questionnaires about consultations and information about medications.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight nurse prescribers and 67 patient group directions users took part; records of 1682 consultations were reviewed, with 1357 medications prescribed and 98.5% therapeutically appropriate. Most medication decisions were deemed safe (96.0% nurse prescribers, 98.7% patient group directions, Fisher's Exact Test p = .55). Errors were predominantly minor (55.6% nurse prescribers, 62.4% patient group directions) and related to documentation omissions (78.0%); no patients were harmed. Consultation durations and unplanned re-consultations were similar for both groups. Nurse prescribers sought assistance from colleagues less frequently (chi-squared = 46.748, df = 1, p < .001) but spent longer discussing cases. Nurse prescribing training required more resources from providers and nurses, compared with patient group directions. Nurse prescribers were on higher salary bands. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups (>96%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse medication provision by both nurse prescribers and patient group direction users is safe and associated with high patient satisfaction; effects on clinic processes and costs are similar. Undertaking the prescribing qualification involves independent study but may bring longer-term career progression to nurses.