Parental perception of treatment and medical care in children with craniosynostosis

Parental satisfaction with hospital care for children with non-syndromic craniosynostosis: A mixed-method study

PURPOSE

The study aims to investigate factors influencing parents' satisfaction with hospital care for children with craniosynostosis during hospitalization for surgery.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A mixed-methods study with a convergent, parallel design was used. Ninety-five parents responded to the Swedish Pyramid Questionnaire for Treatment, a 25-item questionnaire with six quality domains. In addition, 20 parents were interviewed about their experiences. Frequencies were calculated, and content analysis was used to analyze free-text comments and transcribed interviews.

RESULTS

Parents' assessment of the overall quality of care was high (mean 87%, range 10-100%). They were most satisfied in the domain staff attitudes and less satisfied with information routines and participation. Content analysis of the interviews gave two overarching themes: Factors that parents experienced as facilitating good quality of care and Factors that parents experienced as impeding good quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents were generally satisfied with the care provided, and interviews captured parents´ views on important factors. Staff attitudes affected parents' perception of quality of care.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Clear information and dialogue as well as making parents feel they are part of their child's team can result in higher satisfaction, and allowing families to stay together in the hospital can ease the hospitalization experience. Using a theoretical model can help in suggesting relevant caring actions based on parents' reported care experiences.

Child-Patient Perspective on Results After Correction of Sagittal Synostosis and the Difference Between Child-Patient and Parent's Perspectives

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the level of child-patient satisfaction with the surgical result after scaphocephaly correction and the difference between child-patient and parents' perspectives.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent out to children between 6 and 18 years old with isolated sagittal synostosis, who had undergone either a frontobiparietal remodeling or extended strip craniotomy, and separately to their parents.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 96 patients, 81.2% of the patients considered their head to be similar or slightly different from others. Despite the majority being satisfied with the outcome, 33% would change the shape of their head if they could. Patients who underwent extended strip craniotomy wanted to change the back of their head more often (P = 0.002), whereas patients who underwent frontobiparietal remodeling wanted to change their forehead (P = 0.005). The patients' own perspective on head shape was independent of the cephalic index (CI). However, patients with a relatively narrow CI received more remarks from others about their heads (P = 0.038). Parent and child agreement was 49.7% on average. Differences between child-patients and parents were found in reporting adaptive behavior.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients were satisfied with the outcome of their intervention. The child's perspective seems to be a valuable addition to evaluate sagittal synostosis surgery as it is independent of the CI and differentiates between different surgical techniques. In addition, the patient's perspective is comparable to the parent's perspective, but gives more details on adaptive behavior.

The Esthetic Perception of Morphological Severity in Scaphocephalic Patients is Correlated With Specific Head Geometrical Features

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between perception of craniofacial deformity, geometric head features, and 3D head shape analyzed by statistical shape modeling (SSM).

PATIENTS

A total of 18 unoperated patients with scaphocephaly (age  =  5.2  ±  1.1m)-6 were followed-up after spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) (age  =  9.6  ±  1.5m)-and 6 controls (age  =  6.7  ±  2.5m).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

3D head shapes were retrieved from 3D scans or computed tomography (CTs). Various geometrical features were measured: anterior and posterior prominence, take-off angle, average anterior and posterior lateral and horizontal curvatures, cranial index (CI) (cranial width over length), and turricephaly index (TI) (cranial height over length). SSM and principal component analysis (PCA) described shape variability. All models were 3D printed; the perception of deformity was blindly scored by 9 surgeons and 1 radiologist in terms of frontal bossing (FB), occipital bulleting (OB), biparietal narrowing (BN), low posterior vertex (LPV), and overall head shape (OHS).

RESULTS

A moderate correlation was found between FB and anterior prominence (r  =  0.56, P < .01) and take-off angle (r  =  - 0.57, P < .01). OB correlated with average posterior lateral curvature (r  =  0.43, P < 0.01) similarly to BPN (r  =  0.55, P < .01) and LPV (r  =  0.43, P < .01). OHS showed strong correlation with CI (r  =   - 0.68, P < .01) and TI (r  =  0.63, P< .01). SSM Mode 1 correlated with OHS (r  =  0.66, p < .01) while Mode 3 correlated with FB (r  =   - 0.58, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Esthetic cranial appearance in craniofacial patients is correlated to specific geometric parameters and could be estimated using automated methods such as SSM.

Raising a Child with Craniosynostosis: Psychosocial Adjustment in Caregivers

OBJECTIVE

While knowledge of the psychosocial impact of craniofacial conditions is growing, literature regarding the impact on parents remains limited. Parents of children born with a health condition may be at risk of experiencing a range of psychosocial challenges. This study conducted an initial investigation of psychosocial adjustment of parents of individuals with craniosynostosis to inform support provision for families.

SETTING

An online UK-wide mixed-methods survey was distributed to members of Headlines Craniofacial Support.

DESIGN

Quantitative data including standardized measures were analysed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests, and inductive content analysis was used for open-ended questions.

PARTICIPANTS

Mothers (n  =  109) and fathers (n  =  9) of individuals ages 3 months to 49 years with single suture (63%) or syndromic (33%) craniosynostosis participated.

RESULTS

Compared to the general population, parents of individuals with craniosynostosis reported higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression; lower levels of resilience and optimism. Qualitative responses provided insight into parents' experiences of birth, diagnosis, healthcare provision, familial wellbeing, and relationships. Parents reported several unmet information and support needs, alongside a range of positive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illustrates the potential long-term psychosocial implications for parents raising children with craniosynostosis. There is a need for routine psychological screening for family members and provision of appropriate psychological support for those at risk for distress. Non-specialist health professionals may benefit from additional training about craniofacial conditions so they are better equipped to support and refer families.

Aesthetic results in children with single suture craniosynostosis: proposal for a modified Whitaker classification

OBJECTIVE

Aesthetic assessment after surgery for non-syndromic single suture craniosynostosis (SSC) is crucial. Surgeons' evaluation is generally based on Whitaker classification, while parental impression is generally neglected. The aim of this paper is to compare aesthetic perceptions of parents and surgeons after surgery for SSC, expressed by a 10-item questionnaire that complement Whitaker's classification.

METHODS

The authors submitted a 10-item questionnaire integrating Whitaker's classification in order to evaluate the degree of satisfaction, the detailed aesthetics results and the need for surgical revision, to surgeons and parents of a consecutive series of patients operated for SSC between January 2007 and December 2018. The results were collected blindly.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were included in the study. Scaphocephaly and trigonocephaly were the two most frequent craniosynostosis. Parents and surgeons general aesthetics evaluation and average rating for Whitaker's classification were 1.86 vs 1.67 (p = 0.69) and 1.19 vs 1.1 (p = 0.45) respectively. Parents' evaluation for scar perception and alopecia (p < 0.00001), the presence of bony crest (0.002), bony bump (p < 0.00001), or other bone irregularities (p = 0.02) are significantly worse when compared to surgeons' perception.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents seem to be more sensitive to the detection of some aesthetic anomalies and their opinion should not be neglected. The authors propose a modified Whitaker classification based on their results to better stratify the aesthetic outcome after surgery for SSC.

"When the surgery was over, I felt like the worst part had passed": experiences of parents of children with craniosynostosis

PURPOSE

Parents of children scheduled for surgery often experience emotional distress and anxiety. This study aimed to explore parents' experiences of hospital care after their child's craniosynostosis surgery and their perception of support during the year after discharge.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A purposive sample of 19 parents of 12 children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, who had undergone surgery, was recruited from one of two national centers in Sweden. An interview was conducted ~1 year after the child's surgery, from September 2017 to August 2018. The interviews followed a semistructured interview guide, were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis yielded six categories with subcategories as follows: (1) cared for and confident: the hospital staff was perceived as kind, professional, and reliable. (2) Alone and abandoned: sometimes, parents found it hard to initiate contact with professionals during hospitalization and after discharge. (3) The importance of information: thorough information was perceived as essential and the need for information varied during postsurgery period. (4) Feelings of worry: some parents remained worried about risks during recovery and were concerned about comorbidities and development. (5) Alright after all: parents felt that the worst part had been before surgery. (6) The need for support: parents were generally satisfied with the support offered and they often received support from family and friends, or other parents through social media/online forums.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Healthcare professionals must be responsive to what support parents need at different stages in the care process and be aware that parents sometimes hesitate to initiate contact and ask for help and support. Support from healthcare professionals to everyone in the follow-up program, as a default, might be more accessible or acceptable for some parents. Providing online support from professionals should be considered and caregivers could also facilitate peer support among parents, either face-to-face or online.

Craniofacial Dysmorphology in Infants With Non-Syndromic Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is a congenital disorder resulting from the premature suture fusion, leading to complex primary and compensatory morphologic changes in the shape of not only the calvarium and but also into the skull base. This deformity typically requires surgery to correct the shape of the skull and prevent neurologic sequelae, including increased intracranial pressure, sensory deficits, and cognitive impairment.

METHODS

The present multicenter study sought to reverse-engineer the bone dysmorphogenesis seen in non-syndromic UCS using a geometric morphometric approach. Computed tomography scans for 26 non-syndromic UCS patients were converted to three-dimensional mesh models. Two hundred thirty-six unique anatomical landmarks and semi-landmarked curves were then plotted on each model, creating wireframe representations of the patients' skulls.

RESULTS

Generalized Procrustes superimposition, Principal Component Analysis, and heatmaps identified significant superior displacement of the ipsilateral orbit ("harlequin" eye deformity), anterior displacement of the ear ipsilateral to the fused coronal suture, acute deviation of midline skull base structures ipsilateral to the fused coronal suture and flattening of the parietal bone and associated failure to expand superiorly.

CONCLUSIONS

The described technique illustrates the impact of premature coronal suture fusion on the development of the entire skull and proposes how bone dysmorphology contributes to the patients' neurologic sequelae. By bridging novel basic science methodologies with clinical research, the present study quantitatively describes craniofacial development and bone dysmorphogenesis.

Do standard surgical techniques lead to satisfying aesthetic results in nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis?

OBJECTIVE

Surgical correction of synostotic cranial sutures is typically performed early in an affected child's life. Depending on the severity of the cranial synostoses, different aspects of the surgical treatment may have varying degrees of importance. In this sense, the aesthetic appearance in children with normal neurological development in single-suture synostosis plays an important role in self-perception and social acceptance for both the patients themselves and their caregivers. Therefore, in this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the aesthetic outcome after surgical correction in a cohort of patients with nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis.

METHODS

Between December 2002 and December 2019, a total of 99 patients underwent surgical correction of a synostotic sagittal suture at the Medical University of Vienna. Depending on their age, patients underwent either an extended midline strip craniectomy (EMSC) (< 4 months) or a modified pi procedure (MPP) (≥ 4 months). After the surgical procedure, the outcome was evaluated by the treating neurosurgeon at 1- and 12-month follow-up visits, and after approximately 5 years, before the patient entered elementary school. In addition to that, the patients' caregivers were asked to evaluate the aesthetic outcome of the surgical procedure after 12 months. These results were then compared to evaluate potential differences in the perception of the surgical outcome.

RESULTS

After 12 months, the majority of the included patients were evaluated as having a good aesthetic outcome by the treating neurosurgeon (97%) and by their caregivers (89%). These differences did not show statistical significance (p = 0.11). Similarly, no differences in the aesthetic outcome depending on the surgical procedure performed could be found (p = 0.55). At the last follow-up visit, before entering elementary school, all available patients had an excellent or good surgical outcome. Moreover, the majority of caregivers (73%) reported that their child had a normal head shape appearance after surgical correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have suggested that surgical correction of sagittal suture synostosis by simple operative techniques leads to a good aesthetic outcome and a normal head shape appearance in the majority of patients. An analysis of the evaluation of the surgical outcome by either the treating neurosurgeon or the patient caregivers showed comparable results and, thus, early intervention with simple surgical techniques can be recommended.

Biparietal meander expansion technique for sagittal suture synostosis in patients older than 1 year of age-technical note

OBJECTIVE

Sagittal suture synostosis (SSS) is the most common form of craniosynostosis. For older patients, the strategy for surgical correction needs to consider diminished growth dynamics of the skull and an active reconstruction cranioplasty aims to sustain stability for the active child. We describe our technique of biparietal meander expansion (BME) technique for SSS for patients older than 1 year and retrospectively reviewed the perioperative course as well as the subjective experience of patients and caregivers during follow-up.

METHODS

The BME technique incorporates bilateral serpentine craniotomies and fixation of the consecutively expanded bone tongues with crossing sutures for patients with SSS older than 12 months of age at surgery. We reviewed patients undergoing this surgical technique for correction of SSS and collected data about the clinical course and performed a patients reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients or caregivers to evaluate subjective experience and outcome after surgical treatment.

RESULTS

BME was performed in 31 patients (8 females; median age: 43 months; range 13-388). The mean length of operation was 172.7±43 minutes (range 115-294). Patients experienced no immediate complications or neurological morbidity after surgery. Considering a total of 21 completed PROM questionnaires, the head shape after surgery was evaluated as either "better" (57%) or "much better" (43%) compared to preoperatively. Eighty-one percent of patients or caregivers answered that the patient experiences no limitation in daily activities. Although 42.8% perceived the hospital as strenuous, 90.5% would choose to undergo this treatment again.

CONCLUSION

BME is a feasible technique for older SSS patients resulting in immediate stability of the remodelled calvarium with a more normal head shape. The survey among caregivers or patients revealed a favourable subjectively experienced outcome after this type of surgical treatment of SSS in the more complex context of an older patient cohort.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Parental Satisfaction Outcomes of Strip Craniectomy with Postoperative Helmet versus Spring-Mediated Remodeling in Sagittal Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

We sought to compare outcomes and parental satisfaction between 2 approaches for sagittal craniosynostosis: strip craniectomy with spring-mediated skull remodeling (SMSR) and strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet (SCH).

METHODS

Perioperative and outcome data for SMSR or SCH patients between September 2010 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A telephone survey was administered to parents of children who underwent both procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 62 children were treated for sagittal craniosynostosis by either SMSR (n = 45) or SCH (n = 17). The SCH group had a lower estimated blood loss (27 vs. 47.06 mL, p = 0.021) and age at surgery (13.0 vs. 19.8 weeks) than the SMSR group. Three patients underwent early springs removal due to trauma or dislodgement, all of whom converted to helmeting. Of the 62 children initially identified, 59 were determined to have an adequate follow-up time to assess long-term outcomes. The mean follow-up time was 30.1 months (n = 16) in the SCH group and 32.0 months in the SMSR group (n = 43, p = 0.39). Two patients in the SCH group and one in the SMSR group converted to open cranial vault reconstruction. Thirty parents agreed to respond to the satisfaction survey (8 SCH, 22 SMSR) based on a Likert scale of responses (0 being most dissatisfied possible, 4 most satisfied possible). Average satisfaction was 3.86/4.0 in the SCH group and 3.45/4.0 in the SMSR group. No parents in the SCH group would change to SMSR, while 3 of the 22 SMSR survey responders would have changed to SCH.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative outcomes and average parental satisfaction were similar in both groups. Importance of helmet wear compliance and risk of spring dislodgement should be discussed with parents.

Skin Deep: Perception of Scars After Cranial Vault Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Children with craniosynostosis are vulnerable to stigmatization and social withdrawal. Cranial vault reconstruction (CVR) results in large bicoronal scars, which may trigger further insult to self-esteem and social outcasting. This study aimed to delineate determinants of patient scar self-consciousness, parental scar satisfaction, and parent satisfaction with their child's overall medical/surgical care.

METHODS

A 14-item questionnaire was distributed to parents of 95 patients who underwent open CVR at our institution. Age at first surgery, race, hair type, typical style, number of surgeries, complications, and use of distractors were surveyed. Patient scar self-consciousness, parental scar satisfaction, and parent satisfaction with their child's overall medical/surgical care were also queried. T tests and linear regressions were performed for binary and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 45 respondents, significant associations were found between: (1) complications and decreased parent scar satisfaction; (2) complications and decreased overall satisfaction with medical/surgical care, and (3) older age at time of initial surgery and decreased overall medical/surgical satisfaction. A significant association was found between parental scar satisfaction and overall medical/surgical satisfaction (β = 0.65, P = .002). There was no significant association between parent scar satisfaction and parental-reported patient self-consciousness, or parental-reported patient self-consciousness and overall medical/surgical satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results underscore the value of scar aesthetics in reconstructive goals. Advanced age and complications are important determinants of satisfaction. However, the lack of association between parent-reported patient self-consciousness and parental scar satisfaction suggests differences in aesthetic priorities between parents and children. Further studies may elucidate additional aesthetic considerations of CVR in ethnic/racial minorities.

Understanding families' experiences following a diagnosis of non-syndromic craniosynostosis: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

Craniosynostosis is typically diagnosed and surgically corrected within the first year of life. The diagnosis and surgical correction of the condition can be a very stressful experience for families. Despite this, there is little research exploring the impact that craniosynostosis has on families, especially in the period immediately following diagnosis and correction. In this study, the authors aimed to qualitatively examine the psychosocial experience of families with a child diagnosed with craniosynostosis.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING

Tertiary care paediatric health centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Mothers of children newly diagnosed with single-suture, non-syndromic craniosynostosis.

INTERVENTION

Semistructured interviews regarding parental experience with the initial diagnosis, their decision on corrective surgery for their child, the operative experience, the impact of craniosynostosis on the family and the challenges they encountered throughout their journey.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Thematic analysis, a type of qualitative analysis that provides an in-depth account of participant's experiences, was used to analyse the interview data.

RESULTS

Over a 4-year period, 12 families meeting eligibility criteria completed the study. Three main themes (six subthemes) emerged from the preoperative interviews: frustration with diagnostic delays (parental intuition and advocacy, hope for improved awareness), understanding what to expect (healthcare supports, interest in connecting with other families) and justifying the need for corrective surgery (influence of the surgeon, struggle with cosmetic indications). Two main themes (four subthemes) were drawn from the postoperative interviews: overcoming fear (the role of healthcare professionals, transition home) and relief (reduction in parental anxiety, cosmetic improvements).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the diagnosis of craniosynostosis has a profound impact on families, leading them to face many struggles throughout their journey. A better understanding of these experiences will help to inform future practice, with a hope to improve this experience for other families moving forward.

Parents' Experiences of Their Child's Craniosynostosis and the Initial Care Process

Craniosynostosis is usually diagnosed in early infancy. Treatment almost always involves surgery and care is optimally organized around an interdisciplinary team of specialists at a craniofacial center. This study aimed to investigate Swedish parents' experiences of having a child with craniosynostosis and their perceptions of the initial care process. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 parents (10 fathers and 10 mothers) of children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis who were undergoing surgery at the Uppsala Craniofacial Center. A thematic data analysis revealed 6 themes presented in a timeline following the parents' journey from detection of their child's abnormal skull shape to waiting for surgery: Detection of the abnormal skull shape, thoughts, and feelings before the appointment with the craniofacial team, an appointment with the craniofacial team, searching the Internet and social media, waiting for surgery, and suggestions for improvement. Although meeting with the craniofacial team was considered informative, parents expressed concerns about surgery and their infant's long-term prognosis were evident. Most parents had no previous knowledge about craniosynostosis and craniofacial syndromes and wished for more information already at the time of its detection. The Internet was used both at the time of suspicion that something was wrong with the child and later to learn about risks and consequences, alternative treatments and prognosis.

Caregiver stress in children with craniosynostosis: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

We present an overview of the literature on caregiver stress in children with craniosynostosis and report common trends in the literature.

INTRODUCTION

Craniosynostosis occurs approximately 1 in 2500 births. As this is a diagnosis most common in infants and often requires surgical treatment, this is a significant and stressful ordeal for caregivers. Caregiver stress impacts various outcomes for the child, and little is understood and known about caregiver stress in the pediatric craniosynostosis population.

METHODS

A literature search for all articles pertaining to craniosynostosis and parental/caregiver stress was conducted using PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL databases.

RESULTS

Seven articles on caregiver stress in craniofacial abnormalities patients and three articles on caregiver stress in pediatric craniosynostosis patients specifically were identified. Three articles on parental satisfaction after craniosynostosis repair were also identified and included in the review. Few published studies exist in the literature on caregiver stress in children with craniosynostosis and no clear trends were identified. It is evident that caregiver stress significantly affects the psychosocial outcomes of children with craniosynostosis. However, there are an equal number of studies reporting significant differences in caregiver stress in children with craniosynostosis as those reporting no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that caregiver stress affects psychosocial outcomes of children with craniosynostosis, but no clear trends of either increased or decreased levels of stress were identified in caregivers of children with craniosynostosis. Additional research is needed to identify risk factors related to caregiver stress.