Delayed breast cellulitis: An evolving complication of breast conservation

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasonography-Guided Needle Aspiration and Surgical Drainage for the Management of Breast Abscess

Background A breast abscess is a localized collection of inflammatory exudate in breast tissue. It is more common in lactating women. Treatment of the breast abscess is usually by incision and drainage, which is accompanied by extensive trauma, lengthy surgical incisions, psychological distress, surgical scar, and discomfort during dressing changes. Recent research has shown that ultrasonography-guided needle aspiration is an alternative to incision and drainage for breast abscess treatment, has superior cosmetic outcomes, and has fewer costs. However, there are no clear guidelines for the same. The primary objective of this study was to assess and contrast the outcomes and efficacy of two approaches in the treatment of breast abscesses: ultrasonography-guided needle aspiration and conventional incision and drainage. Methods This was a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Patients with breast abscesses were randomized either to receive needle aspiration or incision drainage. Patients with lactational breast abscesses were encouraged to breastfeed from either breast. The antibiotic was given for 10 days to all the patients. The study's main focus was on the primary outcome, which was the failure rate. Additionally, several secondary outcomes were examined, including postoperative pain, time required for healing, presence of residual abscess or recurrence, formation of fistulas, and the assessment of scar appearance. Results A total of 44 patients were randomized to 23 and 21 in each arm. There was no statistical difference in treatment failure (p-value=0.862), fistula formation (p-value=1.00), and recurrence (p-value=1.00). There was a significant statistical difference in healing period (p-value <0.001), scar formation (p-value <0.0001), continuation of breastfeeding (p-value=0.005), and clinical resolution (p-value=0.002). There was a significant reduction in post-intervention pain in the needle aspiration group than in the other group (p-value <0.001). Conclusion This study showed a significant difference in postoperative pain, healing time, the continuation of breastfeeding, and scar formation in the needle aspiration group, favouring minimally invasive treatment for breast abscess. However, due to the small sample size, we could not conclude that ultrasonography-guided needle aspiration of the breast abscess is non-inferior to the conventional incision and drainage.

Surgical-site infection is associated with increased risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical-site infection (SSI) is one of the most common short-term complications following breast cancer treatment and can inhibit lymphatic drainage. It is currently not known whether SSI increases the risk of long-term breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the association between surgical-site infection and the risk of BCRL METHODS: This nationwide study identified all patients treated for unilateral, primary invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer in Denmark between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016 (n = 37,937). A redemption of antibiotics after breast cancer treatment was used as a disease proxy for SSI, included as a time-varying exposure. The risk of BCRL was analyzed up to 3 years after breast cancer treatment using multivariate Cox regression and adjusted for cancer treatment, demographics, comorbidities, and socioeconomic variables.

RESULTS

There were 10,368 (27.33%) patients with a SSI and 27,569 (72.67%) without a SSI (incidence rate per 100 patients, 33.10 (95%CI, 32.47-33.75). The BCRL incidence rate per 100 person-years for patients with SSI was 6.72 (95%CI: 6.41-7.05) and 4.86 (95%CI: 4.70-5.02) for patients without an SSI. There was an overall significant increased risk of BCRL in patients with an SSI (adjusted HR, 1.11; 95%CI: 1.04-1.17), with the highest risk 3 years after breast cancer treatment (adjusted HR, 1.28; 95%CI: 1.08-1.51) CONCLUSION: This large nationwide cohort study showed that SSI was associated with an overall 10% increased risk of BCRL. These findings may be used to identify patients at high risk of BCRL that would benefit from enhanced BCRL surveillance.

Detection of inguinal lymph nodes is promising for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Background

Localized inguinal lymphadenopathy often represents lower extremity pathogen infection, while normalized lymphadenopathy is associated with infection regression. We hypothesized that inguinal lymph nodes (LNs) were enlarged in Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) patients and that normalized inguinal LNs would be a promising way to determine the timing of reimplantation.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 176 patients undergoing primary and revision hip or knee arthroplasty. All patients underwent ultrasound examination of inguinal LNs preoperatively. The diagnostic value of inguinal LNs in PJI was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

The median level of inguinal LNs was 26mm in the revision for PJI group compared with 12 mm in the aseptic revision group (p< 0.0001). The size of the inguinal LNs well distinguishes PJI from aseptic failure (AUC= 0.978) compare with ESR (AUC= 0.707) and CRP (AUC= 0.760). A size of 19mm was determined as the optimal threshold value of the inguinal LNs for the diagnosis of PJI, with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 96%.

Conclusion

Ultrasonic analysis of inguinal LNs is a valuable piece of evidence for the diagnosis of PJI and evaluation of persistent infection.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema among Chinese breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a major long-term complication for post-surgery breast cancer survivors. Although several risk factors have been identified, lifestyle characteristics have been neglected in previous studies. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram for estimating this population's risk of developing lymphedema, taking into consideration their demographic, clinical, and personal lifestyle behaviors.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, we collected data from 775 post-operative breast cancer survivors who had attended a follow-up session in the recent 10 years (primary cohort). Lymphedema was assessed using the Norman telephone questionnaire, self-reported by patients. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for lymphedema, including demographic, clinical, and lifestyle-related factors. A nomogram was constructed based on those factors and was validated using a separate group of 314 breast cancer patients (validation cohort).

RESULTS

The factors independently associated with lymphedema were higher body mass index (BMI), modified radical mastectomy (MRM), postsurgical infection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, exercise of the affected arm, and the active participation in physical activity (P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values of the primary and the validation cohorts were 0.721 (95% confidence interval: 0.685-0.756) and 0.702 (95% confidence interval: 0.646-0.759), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BCRL risk factors include MRM, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and higher BMI, while the active physical activity behavior of patients appears to be a factor against lymphedema. The nomogram incorporating the patients' clinical and lifestyle factors might be useful for predicting lymphedema in breast cancer survivors.

Warmer Weather as a Risk Factor for Cellulitis: A Population-based Investigation

Background

The incidence of cellulitis is highly seasonal and this seasonality may be explained by changes in the weather, specifically, temperature.

Methods

Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (years 1998 to 2011), we identified the geographic location for 773719 admissions with the primary diagnosis (ICD-9-CM code) of cellulitis and abscess of finger and toe (681.XX) and other cellulitis and abscess (682.XX). Next, we used data from the National Climatic Data Center to estimate the monthly average temperature for each of these different locations. We modeled the odds of an admission having a primary diagnosis of cellulitis as a function of demographics, payer, location, patient severity, admission month, year, and the average temperature in the month of admission.

Results

We found that the odds of an admission with a primary diagnosis of cellulitis increase with higher temperatures in a dose-response fashion. For example, relative to a cold February with average temperatures under 40° F, an admission in a hot July with an average temperature exceeding 90°F has 66.63% higher odds of being diagnosed with cellulitis (95% confidence interval [CI]: [61.2, 72.3]). After controlling for temperature, the estimated amplitude of seasonality of cellulitis decreased by approximately 71%.

Conclusion

At a population level, admissions to the hospital for cellulitis risk are strongly associated with warmer weather.

Delayed Breast Cellulitis following Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Literature Review

Background

Delayed breast cellulitis (DBC) is a relatively rare complication following breast-conserving surgery. It is often challenging to distinguish DBC from other clinical conditions such as postoperative infection, inflammatory reaction following radiation, and recurrent inflammatory carcinoma. The definition of DBC, diagnostic approach, and treatment are not well established in the literature.

Methods

We performed a literature search with the keywords 'Delayed breast cellulitis' and 'Breast conservation therapy cellulitis', without limitations to the dates or the article types, in the PubMed database. Information about the number of cases with DBC, the age of the patients, the interval between the onset of symptoms and the time of surgery or radiotherapy, and the type and outcome of DBC treatment were reviewed and tabulated.

Results

We identified only 5 papers that were absolutely related to our subject, reflecting the fact that 'delayed breast cellulitis' is a fairly unknown term and the condition is rather underreported. Although most agree that DBC is primarily an aseptic inflammatory process, bacterial growth may contribute to its development or recurrence. Obesity, breast size, location of the breast tumor, removal of the axillary lymph nodes, and connective tissue disorders are considered as risk factors. There is no clear evidence on how DBC should be best managed. Antibiotic treatment is controversial, and many authors suggest anti-inflammatory agents or sole observation. Prevention of lymph stasis and its consequences with massage and skin care may be helpful. Despite the fact that malignancy is rare, in cases where the condition persists for more than 4 months, a core biopsy should be performed to rule out recurrent or second primary carcinoma.

Conclusion

The correct diagnostic approach is essential as it provides patients with reassurance, minimizes anxiety, and prevents unnecessary medical investigations, treatments, and costs.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema: risk factors, precautionary measures, and treatments

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a negative sequela of breast cancer treatment, and well-established risk factors include axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and regional lymph node radiation (RLNR). BCRL affects approximately 1 in 5 patients treated for breast cancer, and it has a significant negative impact on patients' quality of life after breast cancer treatment, serving as a reminder of previous illness. This paper is a comprehensive review of the current evidence regarding BCRL risk factors, precautionary guidelines, prospective screening, early intervention, and surgical and non-surgical treatment techniques. Through establishing evidence-based BCRL risk factors, researchers and clinicians are better able to prevent, anticipate, and provide early intervention for BCRL. Clinicians can identify patients at high risk and utilize prospective screening programs, which incorporate objective measurements, patient reported outcome measures (PROM), and clinical examination, thereby creating opportunities for early intervention and, accordingly, improving BCRL prognosis. Innovative surgical techniques that minimize and/or prophylactically correct lymphatic disruption, such as axillary reverse mapping (ARM) and lymphatic-venous anastomoses (LVAs), are promising avenues for reducing BCRL incidence. Nonetheless, for those patients with BCRL who remain unresponsive to conservative methods like complete decongestive therapy (CDT), surgical treatment options aiming to reduce limb volume or restore lymphatic flow may prove to be palliative or corrective. It is only through a strong team-based approach that such a continuum of care can exist, and a multidisciplinary approach to BCRL screening, intervention, and research is therefore strongly encouraged.

Association Between Precautionary Behaviors and Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Surgery

Purpose This study examined the lifestyle and clinical risk factors for lymphedema in a cohort of patients who underwent bilateral breast cancer surgery. Patients and Methods Between 2013 and 2016, 327 patients who underwent bilateral breast cancer surgery were prospectively screened for arm lymphedema as quantified by the weight-adjusted volume change (WAC) formula. Arm perometry and subjective data were collected preoperatively and at regular intervals postoperatively. At the time of each measurement, patients completed a risk assessment survey that reported the number of blood draws, injections, blood pressure readings, trauma to the at-risk arm, and number of flights since the previous measurement. Generalized estimating equations were applied to ascertain the association among arm volume changes, clinical factors, and risk exposures. Results The cohort comprised 327 patients and 654 at-risk arms, with a median postoperative follow-up that ranged from 6.1 to 68.2 months. Of the 654 arms, 83 developed lymphedema, defined as a WAC ≥ 10% relative to baseline. On multivariable analysis, none of the lifestyle risk factors examined through the risk assessment survey were significantly associated with increased WAC. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that having a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis ( P = .0404), having undergone axillary lymph node dissection ( P = .0464), and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy ( P = .0161) were significantly associated with increased arm volume. Conclusion Blood pressure readings, blood draws, injections, and number or duration of flights were not significantly associated with increases in arm volume in this cohort. These findings may help to guide patient education about lymphedema risk reduction strategies for those who undergo bilateral breast cancer surgery.

Impact of Ipsilateral Blood Draws, Injections, Blood Pressure Measurements, and Air Travel on the Risk of Lymphedema for Patients Treated for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to investigate the association between blood draws, injections, blood pressure readings, trauma, cellulitis in the at-risk arm, and air travel and increases in arm volume in a cohort of patients treated for breast cancer and screened for lymphedema.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2014, patients undergoing treatment of breast cancer at our institution were screened prospectively for lymphedema. Bilateral arm volume measurements were performed preoperatively and postoperatively using a Perometer. At each measurement, patients reported the number of blood draws, injections, blood pressure measurements, trauma to the at-risk arm(s), and number of flights taken since their last measurement. Arm volume was quantified using the relative volume change and weight-adjusted change formulas. Linear random effects models were used to assess the association between relative arm volume (as a continuous variable) and nontreatment risk factors, as well as clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

In 3,041 measurements, there was no significant association between relative volume change or weight-adjusted change increase and undergoing one or more blood draws (P = .62), injections (P = .77), number of flights (one or two [P = .77] and three or more [P = .91] v none), or duration of flights (1 to 12 hours [P = .43] and 12 hours or more [P = .54] v none). By multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with increases in arm volume included body mass index ≥ 25 (P = .0236), axillary lymph node dissection (P < .001), regional lymph node irradiation (P = .0364), and cellulitis (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that although cellulitis increases risk of lymphedema, ipsilateral blood draws, injections, blood pressure readings, and air travel may not be associated with arm volume increases. The results may help to educate clinicians and patients on posttreatment risk, prevention, and management of lymphedema.

Mycobacterium fortuitum Infection following Reconstructive Breast Surgery: Differentiation from Classically Described Red Breast Syndrome

Background:

Red breast syndrome (RBS) has been described as an erythema that may be associated with 2-stage prosthetic reconstructive breast surgery using biologic mesh. RBS is differentiated from infectious cellulitis through absence of fever and laboratory abnormalities and usually has a self-limiting course. There have been no clinical reports on etiology, risk factors, or management of RBS. This report describes patient data that raise the need to rule out mycobacterial infection when RBS is being considered as a diagnosis.

Methods:

We present 6 cases of Mycobacterium fortuitum infection occurring after prosthetic breast reconstruction performed with a human-derived acellular dermal matrix, including the timing and course of erythema, laboratory results, treatments used, and long-term outcomes. We also describe the differential diagnoses of RBS in the context of these cases, including emergence of acid-fast bacilli and diagnostic and treatment considerations. Exact two-tailed 95% confidence intervals based on the F-distribution are provided with estimates of the incidence rates of infection.

Results:

The 6 cases presented here do not fit the typical description of RBS and were caused by mycobacterium infection. Statistical evaluation of the estimated incidence rate of M. fortuitum infection in a patient thought to have RBS, which occurred 100% of the time in this series, revealed a 95% confidence interval of 54.1–100%.

Conclusions:

When presented with possible RBS, surgeons must rule out cellulitis, culture for acid-fast bacilli such as mycobacterium species, and then determine the best course of treatment. Patient counseling regarding potential household sources of infection is warranted to minimize postoperative infection risk.

Red breast as a presenting complaint at a breast center: an institutional review

BACKGROUND

The differential diagnosis of a red breast is extensive and includes both benign and malignant diseases. The literature documents patients who present with a red breast with delays in diagnosis of inflammatory cancer. We recorded our institutional experience prospectively in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of a red breast.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively on patients who presented with a red breast during a 14-month period. A retrospective review of final diagnosis and outcome was then conducted. A PubMed and Ovid Medline literature search were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients presented with a red breast. This number accounted for only 0.6% (22/3,762) of patients evaluated in our breast center during this time period. Final diagnoses were as follows: mastitis in 31.8%, breast abscess in 13.6%, erythematous changes secondary to radiation therapy in 13.6%, cellulitis in 9.1%, and venous hypertension in 9.1%. Other diagnoses included postradiation morphea, benign dermatologic inflammation, Paget disease of the breast, inflammatory breast cancer, and psoriasis (1 patient each). After treatment, 67% (17/22) patients had resolution of their symptoms and 18% (4/22) were improved. Only 1 (4.5%) of 22 patients had a change in diagnosis in a median follow-up of 8.8 months.

CONCLUSION

A red breast is an uncommon presenting complaint in patients evaluated at a breast center; however, the differential diagnosis is extensive. With appropriate diagnosis and treatment, most patients will have improvement or resolution of their symptoms. The diagnostic algorithm used by our breast center identified the cause of the red breast correctly in >95% of patients at presentation, and it can serve as a guide to evaluate patients with a red breast. This algorithm is in agreement with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.

The dynamic tumor bed: volumetric changes in the lumpectomy cavity during breast-conserving therapy

PURPOSE

To characterize the magnitude of volume change in the postoperative tumor bed before and during radiotherapy, and to identify any factors associated with large volumetric change.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-six consecutive patients with early-stage or preinvasive breast cancer underwent breast-conserving therapy at our institution between June 2006 and October 2007. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the breast were obtained shortly after surgery, before the start of radiotherapy (RT) for treatment planning, and, if applicable, before the tumor bed boost. Postoperative changes, seroma, and surgical clips were used to define the tumor bed through consensus agreement of 3 observers (B.P., D.I., and J.L.). Multiple variables were examined for correlation with volumetric change.

RESULTS

Between the first and last scan obtained (median time, 7.2 weeks), the tumor bed volume decreased at least 20% in 86% of patients (n = 31) and at least 50% in 64% of patients (n = 23). From the postoperative scan to the planning scan (median time, 3 weeks), the tumor bed volume decreased by an average of 49.9%, or approximately 2.1% per postoperative day. From planning scan to boost scan (median interval, 7 weeks), the median tumor bed volume decreased by 44.6%, at an average rate of 0.95% per postoperative day. No single factor was significantly associated with a change in tumor bed volume greater than 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

The average postlumpectomy cavity undergoes dramatic volumetric change after surgery and continues this change during RT. The rate of change is inversely proportional to the duration from surgery. In this study no factors studied predicted large volumetric change.

Four-Week Course of Radiation for Breast Cancer Using Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With an Incorporated Boost

PURPOSE

Standard radiation for early breast cancer requires daily treatment for 6 to 7 weeks. This is an inconvenience to many women, and for some a barrier for breast conservation. We present the acute toxicity of a 4-week course of hypofractionated radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 75 patients completed radiation on a Phase II trial approved by the hospital institutional review board. Eligibility criteria were broad to include any patient normally eligible for standard radiation: age >or=18 years, invasive or in situ cancer, American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage 0 to II, breast-conserving surgery, and any systemic therapy not given concurrently. The median age was 52 years (range, 31-81 years). Of the patients, 15% had ductal carcinoma in situ, 67% T1, and 19% T2; 71% were N0, 17% N1, and 12% NX. Chemotherapy was given before radiation in 44%. Using photon intensity-modulated radiation therapy and incorporated electron beam boost, the whole breast received 45 Gy and the lumpectomy bed 56 Gy in 20 treatments over 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The maximum acute skin toxicity by the end of treatment was Grade 0 in 9 patients (12%), Grade 1 in 49 (65%) and Grade 2 in 17 (23%). There was no Grade 3 or higher skin toxicity. After radiation, all Grade 2 toxicity had resolved by 6 weeks. Hematologic toxicity was Grade 0 in most patients except for Grade 1 neutropenia in 2 patients, and Grade 1 anemia in 11 patients. There were no significant differences in baseline vs. 6-week posttreatment patient-reported or physician-reported cosmetic scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This 4-week course of postoperative radiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy is feasible and is associated with acceptable acute skin toxicity and quality of life. Long-term follow-up data are needed. This radiation schedule may represent an alternative both to longer 6-week to 7-week standard whole-breast radiation and more radically shortened 1-week, partial-breast treatment schedules.