1
|
Shirata R, Inoue T, Sugimoto S, Saito AI, Omura M, Minagawa Y, Sasai K. Dosimetric investigation of whole-brain radiotherapy with helical intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for scalp sparing. BJR Open 2023; 5:20220037. [PMID: 37035770 PMCID: PMC10077410 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20220037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a well-established radiotherapy technique for delivering radiation to cancer with high conformity while sparing the surrounding normal tissue. Two main purposes of this study are: (1) to investigate dose calculation accuracy of helical IMRT (HIMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on surface region and (2) to evaluate the dosimetric efficacy of HIMRT and VMAT for scalp-sparing in whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Methods: First, using a radiochromic film and water-equivalent phantom with three types of boluses (1, 3, 5 mm), calculation/measurement dose agreement at the surface region in the VMAT and HIMRT plans were examined. Then, HIMRT, 6MV-VMAT and 10MV-VMAT with scalp-sparing, and two conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans (6MV-3DCRT and 10MV-3DCRT; as reference data) were created for 30 patients with brain metastasis (30 Gy/10 fractions). The mean dose to the scalp and the scalp volume receiving 24 and 30 Gy were compared. Results: The percentage dose differences between the calculation and measurement were within 7%, except for the HIMRT plan at a depth of 1 mm. The averaged mean scalp doses [Gy], V24Gy [%], and V30Gy [%] (1SD) for 6MV-3DCRT, 10MV-3DCRT, HIMRT, 6MV-VMAT, and 10MV-VMAT were [26.6 (1.1), 86.4 (7.3), 13.2 (4.2)], [25.4 (1.0), 77.8 (7.5), 13.2 (4.2)], [23.2 (1.5), 42.8 (19.2), 0.2 (0.5)], [23.6 (1.6), 47.5 (17.9), 1.2 (1.8)], and [22.7 (1.7), 36.4 (17.6), 0.7 (1.1)], respectively. Conclusion: Regarding the dose parameters, HIMRT achieved a lower scalp dose compared with 6MV-VMAT. However, the highest ability to reduce the mean scalp dose was showed in 10MV-VMAT. Advances in knowledge: Scalp-sparing WBRT using HIMRT or VMAT may prevent radiation-induced alopecia in patients with BM.
Collapse
|
2
|
Saito AI, Hirai T, Inoue T, Hojo N, Kawai S, Kato Y, Ito K, Kato M, Ozawa Y, Shinjo H, Toda K, Yoshimura RI. Time to Pain Relapse After Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastasis: A Prospective Multi-institutional Study. Anticancer Res 2023; 43:865-873. [PMID: 36697080 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Low risk asymptomatic bone metastasis (LRABM) without gross osteolytic changes tends to be out of indication for radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time between the end of palliative radiotherapy of bone metastasis (BM) until the start of new pain, in patients with painful BM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with BM were prospectively assessed for location and strength of pain every month for one year after radiotherapy. The correlation of pain relapse at irradiated site, and pain onset outside the irradiated site was evaluated with sex, age, primary tumor, pathology of tumor, visceral metastases, baseline scores for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), and baseline verbal rating scale (VRS). RESULTS A hundred and thirty-two patients were included (79 males and 53 females). Median age was 66 years. Primary sites were lung (n=60), breast (n=17), colon (n=12), prostate (n=11), and others (n=33) (one patient had two primary sites). Median follow-up was 185 days. Pain relief was observed in 92 patients (86.0%). Out of them, pain progression was observed in 69.6%. Median time to pain progression was 75.5 days. Pain onset outside the irradiated site was observed in 57 patients (43.2%). Median time to pain onset was 109 days. Out of the 57 patients, 13 (22.8%) had LRABM which existed before the start of radiotherapy. There were 54 patients with LRABM in this study and because many patients had more than one LRABM, the total LRABM sites were 123. Out of them, pain onset was observed within one year after irradiation in 44 (36%) lesions. Median time to pain onset was 67 days, which was the shortest of the three: irradiated site, out of the irradiated site, and LRABM site. Risk factors for high probability of pain onset within one year in LRABM lesions were female sex (showing a trend in univariate analysis), and pelvic, skull and spine metastasis (significant in multivariate analysis). CONCLUSION Time to pain onsets in LRABM are relatively short, especially in female patients with pelvic, skull and spine metastasis. In these patients, prophylactic radiotherapy could be an option to consider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;
| | - Takahisa Hirai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noboru Hojo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoru Kawai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yui Kato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kana Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masako Kato
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukiko Ozawa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidenori Shinjo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuma Toda
- Department of Radiation Therapeutics and Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo-Ichi Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Therapeutics and Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Murakami N, Watanabe M, Uno T, Sekii S, Tsujino K, Kasamatsu T, Machitori Y, Aoshika T, Kato S, Hirowatari H, Kaneyasu Y, Nakagawa T, Ikushima H, Ando K, Murata M, Yoshida K, Yoshioka H, Murata K, Ohno T, Okonogi N, Saito AI, Ichikawa M, Okuda T, Tsuchida K, Sakurai H, Yoshimura R, Yoshioka Y, Yorozu A, Kunitake N, Okamoto H, Inaba K, Kato T, Igaki H, Itami J. Phase I/II prospective clinical trial for the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2022; 34:e24. [PMID: 36603849 PMCID: PMC10157336 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purposes of this trial were to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (HBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer patients in the phase I/II prospective clinical trial. METHODS Patients with FIGO stage IB2-IVA uterine cervical cancer pretreatment width of which was ≥5 cm measured by magnetic resonance imaging were eligible for this clinical trial. The protocol therapy included 30-30.6 Gy in 15-17 fractions of whole pelvic radiotherapy concurrent with weekly CDDP, followed by 24 Gy in 4 fractions of HBT and pelvic radiotherapy with a central shield up to 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. The primary endpoint of phase II part was 2-year pelvic progression-free survival (PPFS) rate higher than historical control of 64%. RESULTS Between October 2015 and October 2019, 73 patients were enrolled in the initial registration and 52 patients proceeded to the secondary registration. With the median follow-up period of 37.3 months (range, 13.9-52.9 months), the 2- PPFS was 80.7% (90% confidence interval [CI]=69.7%-88%). Because the lower range of 90% CI of 2-year PPFS was 69.7%, which was higher than the historical control ICBT data of 64%, therefore, the primary endpoint of this study was met. CONCLUSION The effectiveness of HBT were demonstrated by a prospective clinical study. Because the dose goal determined in the protocol was lower than 85 Gy, there is room in improvement for local control. A higher dose might have been needed for tumors with poor responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Miho Watanabe
- Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Uno
- Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shuhei Sekii
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Therapy, Kita-Harima Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kayoko Tsujino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kasamatsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yumiko Machitori
- Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomomi Aoshika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shingo Kato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | | | - Yuko Kaneyasu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomio Nakagawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ikushima
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Ken Ando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Gunma, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Masumi Murata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Gunma, Japan
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroto Yoshioka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Murata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.,QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Okonogi
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayumi Ichikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Takahito Okuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Toyota Memorial Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Keisuke Tsuchida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba Faculty of Medicine, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Therapeutics and Oncology, Tokyo Medical Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuo Yoshioka
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsunori Yorozu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naonobu Kunitake
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Inaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kato
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harigai A, Saito AI, Inoue T, Suzuki M, Namba Y, Suzuki Y, Makino F, Nagashima O, Sasaki S, Sasai K. The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT taken immediately after completion of radiotherapy for lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A pilot study. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:711-716. [PMID: 35715357 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The prognostic value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) taken immediately after completion of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients is not well known. The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic value of PET/CT taken immediately after completion of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with primary lung cancer planned to undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. Patients underwent PET/CT scans at 3 time points: before radiotherapy, within 24hours of completing radiotherapy (im-PET/CT), and 2-9 months after radiotherapy (post-PET/CT). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was obtained. A post-PET/CT-SUVmax cut-off of 2.5 was determined as radiotherapy success. RESULTS Nineteen patients were enrolled. im-PET/CT-SUVmax for patients in the high post-PET/CT-SUVmax group was significantly higher than that of the low group (P=0.004). Receiver operator curve analysis indicated that im-PET/CT-SUVmax of 4.35 was an optimal cut-off value to discriminate between the two groups. Multivariable analysis showed that a high im-PET/CT-SUVmax was significantly associated with a high post-PET/CT-SUVmax (P=0.003). CONCLUSION PET/CT-SUVmax taken immediately following radiotherapy was associated with that evaluated 2-9 months after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Harigai
- Clinical training center, Juntendo university, Urayasu hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka Urayasushi, Chiba, Japan
| | - A I Saito
- Department of radiation oncology, Juntendo university, faculty of medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - T Inoue
- Department of radiation oncology, Juntendo university, faculty of medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Suzuki
- Department of radiology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto geriatric medical center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y Namba
- Department of respiratory medicine, Juntendo university, Urayasu hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Y Suzuki
- Department of respiratory medicine, Juntendo university, Urayasu hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - F Makino
- Department of respiratory medicine, Juntendo university, Urayasu hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - O Nagashima
- Department of respiratory medicine, Juntendo university, Urayasu hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - S Sasaki
- Department of respiratory medicine, Juntendo university, Urayasu hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - K Sasai
- Department of radiation oncology, Juntendo university, faculty of medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Murakami N, Ando K, Murata M, Murata K, Ohno T, Aoshika T, Kato S, Okonogi N, Saito AI, Kim JY, Yoshioka Y, Sekii S, Tsujino K, Lowanichkiattikul C, Pattaranutaporn P, Kaneyasu Y, Nakagawa T, Watanabe M, Uno T, Umezawa R, Jingu K, Kanemoto A, Wakatsuki M, Shirai K, Igaki H, Itami J. An Asian multi-national multi-institutional retrospective study comparing intracavitary versus the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical carcinoma. J Radiat Res 2022; 63:412-427. [PMID: 35446962 PMCID: PMC9124620 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
This study is an international multi-institutional retrospective study comparing the clinical outcomes between intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (HBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiation therapy. Locally advanced cervical cancer, the initial size of which is larger than 4 cm and treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy, were eligible for this retrospective study. Patients who received HBT at least once were included in the HBT group, and patients who received only ICBT were included in the ICBT group. Anonymized data from 469 patients from 13 institutions in Japan, one from Korea and one from Thailand, were analyzed. Two hundred eighty and 189 patients were included in the ICBT group and the HBT group, respectively. Patients in the HBT group had more advanced stage, non-Scc histopathology, a higher rate of uterine body involvement, larger tumor at diagnosis, larger tumor before brachytherapy and a lower tumor reduction ratio. With a median follow-up of 51.3 months (2.1-139.9 months), 4-y local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire patient population were 88.2%, 64.2% and 83%, respectively. The HBT group received a higher HR-CTV D90 than that of the ICBT group (68.8 Gy vs 65.6 Gy, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the non-Scc histological subtype, HR-CTV D95 ≤ 60 Gy, reduction ratio ≤ 29% and total treatment time (TTT) ≥ 9 weeks were identified as the independent adverse prognostic factors for LC. Regarding LC, no difference was found between ICBT and HBT (4-y LC 89.3% vs 86.8%, P = 0.314). After adjustment for confounding factors by propensity score matching, no advantage of applying HBT was demonstrated regarding LC, PFS, or OS. Despite the fact that HBT patients had more adverse clinical factors than ICBT patients, HBT delivered a higher dose to HR-CTV and resulted in comparable LC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoya Murakami
- Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. ;
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. ;
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saito AI, Inoue T, Kinoshita M, Kosaka T, Mitsuhashi T. Strontium-89 chloride delivery for painful bone metastases in patients with a history of prior irradiation. Ir J Med Sci 2022; 192:569-574. [PMID: 35538276 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-03023-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Re-irradiation of a previously irradiated site must be done with careful consideration to minimize dose to organs at risk. AIMS To evaluate pain response and safety of Sr-89 administration for painful bone metastases after prior irradiation. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with Sr-89 injection for painful bone metastasis in a previously irradiated site. All patients were seen in follow-up at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months after injection and every 6 months thereafter. Pain control, toxicity, and pain progression-free survival were analyzed. Correlation of pain relapse with the following characteristics was analyzed: gender, age, primary tumor, tumor pathology, baseline performance status, and baseline verbal rating scale. RESULTS Among 25 patients analyzed (10 male, 15 female), median age was 68 (range, 50-81) years. Primary tumor sites included lung (n = 11), breast (n = 3), uterine cervix (n = 3), prostate (n = 3), and others (n = 5). Median follow-up was 25 (range, 1-76) months. Pain relief was observed in 24 patients (96.0%). One- and 2-year pain progression-free survival rates in these patients were 54.5% and 48.4%, respectively. Median time to pain progression was 5 (range, 2-16) months. Statistically significantly lower pain progression-free survival was observed in patients with osteolytic bone metastases (p < 0.01). No grade 3 or worse adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION Sr-89 injection showed pain relief in most of our patients with painful bone metastases in a previously irradiated site and caused no grade 3 or worse adverse events. Sr-89 is an option for patients with a painful bone metastasis in a previously irradiated site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makiko Kinoshita
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo Univeristy Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kosaka
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo Univeristy Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Taira Mitsuhashi
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo Univeristy Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chapman CH, Nomura K, Kothari A, Atluri' N, Saito AI. Workplace Gender Inequity Is Driven by Broader Societal Inequity: A Qualitative Study of Senior Japanese and American Radiation Oncologists. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100879. [PMID: 35198834 PMCID: PMC8844661 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Gender inequity in medicine harms society, and often originates in the context of broader societal discrimination. This study explores the experiences of older women in the radiation oncology specialty in Japan and the United States, with an emphasis on understanding how broader gender inequity affects career trajectory. Radiation oncology is an ideal setting to investigate cross-cultural physician gender equity issues, because few women enter the field despite fewer barriers (eg, frequent emergencies, evening/weekend hours, long procedures) that are commonly cited by women as deterrents in specialty selection. Methods and Materials Between 2012 and 2016, the authors interviewed 14 older women in radiation oncology (department chairs or full professors), with 6 from Japan and 8 from the United States. Multiple analysts identified themes to explore the impact of societal gender inequity on female radiation oncologists’ careers. Results Five themes were identified: (1) childhood gender constructs affect career aspirations, (2) persistent sexism and gender-based workplace challenges affect women's careers, (3) gender inequity in the home affects women's careers, (4) non–gender-related factors intersect to affect women's career satisfaction, and (5) attaining gender equity appears to be even more challenging in Japan compared with the United States. Conclusions Female radiation oncologists in 2 of the most technologically advanced countries report that gender discrimination across their lifespans substantially affects career success. Because gender inequality reflects societal injustice and negatively affects scientific progress and patient outcomes, future research should focus on global approaches to address professional and domestic gender constructs that impede women's career progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Hunter Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kyoko Nomura
- Department of Public Health, AkitaUniversity Graduate School of Medicine, Akita City, Japan
| | | | | | - Anneyuko I. Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine, Bunkyo, Japan
- Corresponding author: Anneyuko I. Saito, MD, PhD
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Harima Y, Ariga T, Kaneyasu Y, Ikushima H, Tokumaru S, Shimamoto S, Takahashi T, Ii N, Tsujino K, Saito AI, Ushijima H, Toita T, Ohno T. Clinical value of serum biomarkers, squamous cell carcinoma antigen and apolipoprotein C-II in follow-up of patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation: A multicenter prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0259235. [PMID: 34727105 PMCID: PMC8562853 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
There are currently no reliable, established serum biomarkers to predict the prognosis of radiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer. We aimed to identify serum biomarkers for survival after radiotherapy for cervical cancer. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, the usefulness of pre- and posttreatment serum protein levels of potential biomarkers, including squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), apolipoprotein C-II (ApoC-II), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)1, and MMP2, were evaluated together with clinical factors in 145 cervical cancer patients in order to determine their suitability to predict survival. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS), pelvic PFS (PPFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were the secondary endpoints. Blood samples were collected before and 1 month after radiotherapy to measure serum biomarker levels. ApoC-II was measured using a monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which was developed for this purpose. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analyses. In multivariate analysis, larger tumor size was independently associated with shorter PFS, OS, PPFS, and DMFS, while longer overall treatment time was independently associated with shorter PPFS. Higher pretreatment SCC-Ag (P < 0.001) was associated with shorter DMFS. Higher posttreatment SCC-Ag (P = 0.017) was also associated with shorter DMFS. Pretreatment ApoC-II was associated with PPFS in univariate analysis (P = 0.048), but not in multivariate analysis. Patients with pretreatment ApoC-II levels ≤ 25.8 μg/ml had shorter PPFS than those with pretreatment ApoC-II levels > 25.8 μg/ml (P = 0.023, log-rank test). Pre- and posttreatment serum SCC-Ag and pretreatment serum ApoC-II levels may be important biomarkers to predict survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer after radiotherapy. Pre- and posttreatment SCC-Ag and pretreatment ApoC-II might be useful in clinical settings for screening patients to improve treatment strategies in cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoko Harima
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | - Takuro Ariga
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
- Health Information Management Center, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Yuko Kaneyasu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ikushima
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Sunao Tokumaru
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Japan
| | | | - Takeo Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Noriko Ii
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Mie Japan
| | - Kayoko Tsujino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Anneyuko I. Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Ushijima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Toita
- Radiation Therapy Center, Okinawa Chubu hospital, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Murakami N, Ando K, Murata M, Murata K, Ohno T, Aoshika T, Kato S, Okonogi N, Saito AI, Kim JY, Kumai Y, Yoshioka Y, Sekii S, Tsujino K, Lowanichkiattikul C, Pattaranutaporn P, Kaneyasu Y, Nakagawa T, Watanabe M, Uno T, Umezawa R, Jingu K, Kanemoto A, Wakatsuki M, Shirai K, Igaki H, Itami J. Why not de-intensification for uterine cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:105-109. [PMID: 34294413 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The majority of uterine cervical cancer is known to be related to human papillomavirus (HPV), and HPV-related tumors are known to be radio-sensitive. In the management of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer, de-intensification of treatment has been attempted; however, no such attempt is performed in the management of cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to identify a group of patients who can safely be treated by de-escalated treatment intensity. METHODS From the Asian international multi-institutional retrospective study involving 13 Japanese, one Thailand, and one Korean institutions based on 469 patients, squamous cell carcinoma (Scc), tumor reduction ratio ≥29%, tumor size before brachytherapy ≤4 cm, and total treatment time (TTT) <9 weeks were identified as factors having an influence on local control. Based on these findings, low-risk patients having these four factors were extracted, and treatment outcomes categorized in 10 Gy increment of CTVHR D90 were compared. RESULTS Among 469 patients, 162 patients (34.5%) met the criteria of low-risk group, and 63, 41, 43, and 15 patients were categorized in CTVHR D90 50-60 Gy, 60-70 Gy, 70-80 Gy, and >80 Gy, respectively. While 4-y progression-free survival ranged from 66 to 80%, 4-y local control was consistently over 90% in every dose group. Rectum and bladder D2cc and incidence of late adverse events decreased as CTVHR D90 decreased. CONCLUSIONS The low-risk patients achieved favorable local control with CTVHR D90 <80 Gy. A personalized treatment strategy based on tumor response could also be adopted for cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Ken Ando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Gunma, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Masumi Murata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Gunma, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Murata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan; QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tomomi Aoshika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shingo Kato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Okonogi
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Joo-Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Yasuko Kumai
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuo Yoshioka
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Sekii
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan; Department of Radiation Therapy, Kita-Harima Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kayoko Tsujino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Chairat Lowanichkiattikul
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Poompis Pattaranutaporn
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Yuko Kaneyasu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomio Nakagawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Miho Watanabe
- Department of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Uno
- Department of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Ayae Kanemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Masaru Wakatsuki
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan; Department of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Shirai
- Department of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hu R, Saito AI, Mitsuhashi T, Inoue T, Ota T, Ujihira T, Yoshida K, Sasai K. Radiosensitization using hydrogen peroxide in patients with cervical cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 2021; 15:142. [PMID: 34094540 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of radiosensitization using hydrogen peroxide for cervical cancer. In superficial tumors, breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, the safety and effectiveness of radiosensitization has been reported; to the best of our knowledge, however, there are no reports on cervical cancer. A total of 20 patients with cervical cancer were recruited. Inclusion criteria were as follows: Patients who required radical external beam radiotherapy (RT); ineligible for or refused brachytherapy; age, ≥20 years; no hematogenous metastasis; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status up to 2; and had not undergone prior treatment. Hydrogen peroxide was used twice a week in combination with RT. A 3% hydrogen peroxide solution-soaked gauze was inserted into the vagina during RT. A total of 45 Gy was delivered in 25 fractions to the whole pelvis with a boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions if pelvic or para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes were observed. Ultimately, 18 patients were evaluated. Among the 17 patients (excluding one patient with tumor in situ), the one- and two-year overall survival rates were both 90% in patients with stage I/II and 86% in stage III/IV cervical cancer. The adverse events were well tolerated with no severe acute or late adverse events. Although limited by small sample size, short observation time and low radiation dose, the present study demonstrated that radiosensitization treatment may be an option for patients who cannot undergo brachytherapy. The study was retrospectively registered at the university hospital medical information network center (no. UMIN000039045) on January 6, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| | - Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| | - Taira Mitsuhashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Ota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba 279-0021, Japan
| | - Takafumi Ujihira
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba 279-0021, Japan
| | - Koyo Yoshida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba 279-0021, Japan
| | - Keisuke Sasai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aibe N, Karasawa K, Aoki M, Akahane K, Ogawa Y, Ogo E, Kanamori S, Kawamori J, Saito AI, Shiraishi K, Sekine H, Tachiiri S, Yoshimura M, Yamauchi C. Results of a nationwide survey on Japanese clinical practice in breast-conserving radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Radiat Res 2019; 60:142-149. [PMID: 30476198 PMCID: PMC6373682 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rry095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey on the clinical practice of postoperative radiotherapy for breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. This questionnaire consisted of 18 questions pertaining to the annual number of treated patients, planning method, contouring structure, field design, dose-fractionated regimen, application of hypofractionated radiotherapy, boost irradiation, radiotherapy for synchronously bilateral breast cancer, and accelerated partial breast irradiation. The web-based questionnaire had responses from 293 Japanese hospitals. The results indicated the following: treatment planning is performed using relatively similar field designs and delivery methods; the field-in-field technique is used at more than one-third of institutes; the commonest criteria for boost irradiation is based on the surgical margin width (≤5 mm) and the second commonest criteria was age (≤40 or ≤50 years), although some facilities applied a different age criterion (>70 years) for omitting a tumor bed boost; for conventional fractionation, almost all institutes delivered 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the conserved whole breast and 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed. This survey revealed that 43% of hospitals offered hypofractionated radiotherapy, and the most common regimens were 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions for whole-breast irradiation and 10.64 Gy in 4 fractions for boost irradiation. Almost all of the facilities irradiated both breasts simultaneously for synchronously bilateral breast cancer, and accelerated partial breast irradiation was rarely offered in Japan. This survey provided an overview of the current clinical practice of radiotherapy for breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norihiro Aibe
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kumiko Karasawa
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, School of Medicine, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Aoki
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu, Hirosaki city, Aomori, Japan
| | - Keiko Akahane
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Ogawa
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Director, Hyogo Prefectural Kakogawa Medical Center, 203 Kann, Kakogawa cityi, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-Machi, Kurume City, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shuichi Kanamori
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jiro Kawamori
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke`s International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Anneyuko I Saito
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenshiro Shiraishi
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiology, Teikyo University, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Sekine
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiology, the Jikei University, School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku,Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiji Tachiiri
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Uji Tokushukai Medical Center, 145 Ishibashi, Maxima-cho, Uji City, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Michio Yoshimura
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Chikako Yamauchi
- Breast Cancer Group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shiga General Hospital, 30-4-5 Moriyama, Moriyama City, Shiga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Natsume T, Ozaki H, Saito AI, Naito H. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation with blood flow restriction increases serum growth hormone concentration. Gazz Med Ital - Arch Sci Med 2018. [DOI: 10.23736/s0393-3660.17.03657-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
13
|
Saito AI, Suda M, Sasai K, Jagsi R. Satisfaction of breast cancer patients regarding surgery and radiation therapy: A survey in Japan. Adv Radiat Oncol 2016; 1:216-221. [PMID: 28740890 PMCID: PMC5514224 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2016.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate patient satisfaction in Japan and factors, including timing factors, cost, and specific medical practices derived from Western influence (shared decision-making and second opinion), which might affect satisfaction. Methods and materials All patients who presented to 1 large Japanese department of radiation oncology for postoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer from September 2010 to November 2013 were included in this study. The questionnaire was distributed to patients after the radiation oncologist consultation, and patients were asked to complete it anonymously by the end of treatment. We measured patient satisfaction with overall treatment and for each treatment separately (surgery, radiation oncology). We further inquired regarding facts that could affect satisfaction, including time from diagnosis to treatment start, waiting time in waiting room for consultation, average length of consultations, out-of-pocket cost for breast cancer treatment, patients' opinion of the cost, level of inclusion of the patient in decision-making, level of the patient sharing her feelings with her physician, and whether the patients had asked for second opinion. Results Of 364 patients surveyed, 214 (58.5%) responded. Overall satisfaction and satisfaction with surgeon and with radiation oncologist were 95.7%, 98.5%, and 98.2%, respectively. Factors correlated with satisfaction were waiting time for the consult in the waiting room, treatment cost, and perceived degree of sharing feelings with physicians. Overall, 27 patients (12.6%) reported having asked for second opinions. Of those who did not seek a second opinion, most (173) indicated that they did not think it was necessary. Conclusions In a large, typical Japanese radiation oncology practice, breast cancer patients' satisfaction correlated with waiting time, cost, and the rate with which the patient shared her feelings with her physician. This illuminates targets for quality improvement within the Japanese system and provides interesting cross-cultural comparative data for other countries in which the context of care may differ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneyuko I Saito
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Chibaken, Japan
| | - Masaru Suda
- Department of Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Chibaken, Japan
| | - Keisuke Sasai
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Chibaken, Japan
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Saito AI, Olivier KR, Li JG, Liu C, Newlin HE, Schmalfuss I, Kyogoku S, Dempsey JF. Lung tumor motion change during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): an evaluation using MRI. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014; 15:4434. [PMID: 24892328 PMCID: PMC5711053 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2013] [Revised: 01/07/2014] [Accepted: 12/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate changes in lung tumor internal target volume during stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment (SBRT) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ten lung cancer patients (13 tumors) undergoing SBRT (48 Gy over four consecutive days) were evaluated. Each patient underwent three lung MRI evaluations: before SBRT (MRI-1), after fraction 3 of SBRT (MRI-3), and three months after completion of SBRT (MRI-3m). Each MRI consisted of T1-weighted images in axial plane through the entire lung. A cone-beam CT (CBCT) was taken before each fraction. On MRI and CBCT taken before fractions 1 and 3, gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured and differences between the two volumes were compared. Median tumor size on CBCT before fractions1 (CBCT-1) and 3 (CBCT-3) was 8.68 and 11.10 cm3, respectively. In 12 tumors, the GTV was larger on CBCT-3 compared to CBCT-1 (median enlargement, 1.56 cm3). Median tumor size on MRI-1, MRI-3, and MRI-3m was 7.91, 11.60, and 3.33 cm3, respectively. In all patients, the GTV was larger on MRI-3 compared to MRI-1 (median enlargement, 1.54 cm3). In all patients, GTV was smaller on MRI-3m compared to MRI-1 (median shrinkage, 5.44 cm3). On CBCT and MRI, all patients showed enlargement of the GTV during the treatment week of SBRT, except for one patient who showed minimal shrinkage (0.86 cm3). Changes in tumor volume are unpredictable; therefore, motion and breathing must be taken into account during treatment planning, and image-guided methods should be used, when treating with large fraction sizes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Saito AI, Li JG, Liu C, Olivier KR, Kahler D, Karasawa K, Dempsey JF. The Dosimetric Effects of Ignoring Small Non-bone High-density Regions Using the 5-Bulk-density Method for Photon Dose Calculation. Hong Kong J Radiol 2014. [DOI: 10.12809/hkjr1413180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
16
|
Saito AI. With warm hearts and strong wills: hospital volunteering in Japan. Can Fam Physician 2013; 59:527-528. [PMID: 23673592 PMCID: PMC3653660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
|
17
|
Izawa H, Hirowatari H, Yahata Y, Hamano Y, Ito K, Saito AI, Yamamoto H, Miura K, Karasawa K, Sasai K. Effect of dose fractionation on pulmonary complications during total body irradiation. J Radiat Res 2011; 52:502-508. [PMID: 21905309 DOI: 10.1269/jrr.10173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
|
18
|
Kawase E, Karasawa K, Shimotsu S, Izawa H, Hirowatari H, Saito AI, Ito K, Horikawa N. Estimation of anxiety and depression in patients with early stage breast cancer before and after radiation therapy. Breast Cancer 2010; 19:147-52. [DOI: 10.1007/s12282-010-0220-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2010] [Accepted: 08/03/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
19
|
Saito AI. A Japanese physician's experience as an inpatient in the United States and Japan. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 283 Suppl 1:105-6. [PMID: 20585953 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1570-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2010] [Accepted: 06/15/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Saito AI, Li JG, Liu C, Olivier KR, Dempsey JF. Accurate heterogeneous dose calculation for lung cancer patients without high-resolution CT densities. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2009; 10:92-103. [PMID: 19458588 PMCID: PMC5720462 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v10i2.2847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2008] [Revised: 10/17/2008] [Accepted: 12/13/2008] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the relative accuracy of megavoltage photon‐beam dose calculations employing either five bulk densities or independent voxel densities determined by calibration of the CT Houndsfield number. Full‐resolution CT and bulk density treatment plans were generated for 70 lung or esophageal cancer tumors (66 cases) using a commercial treatment planning system with an adaptive convolution dose calculation algorithm (Pinnacle3, Philips Medicals Systems). Bulk densities were applied to segmented regions. Individual and population average densities were compared to the full‐resolution plan for each case. Monitor units were kept constant and no normalizations were employed. Dose volume histograms (DVH) and dose difference distributions were examined for all cases. The average densities of the segmented air, lung, fat, soft tissue, and bone for the entire set were found to be 0.14, 0.26, 0.89, 1.02, and 1.12 g/cm3, respectively. In all cases, the normal tissue DVH agreed to better than 2% in dose. In 62 of 70 DVHs of the planning target volume (PTV), agreement to better than 3% in dose was observed. Six cases demonstrated emphysema, one with bullous formations and one with a hiatus hernia having a large volume of gas. These required the additional assignment of density to the emphysemic lung and inflammatory changes to the lung, the regions of collapsed lung, the bullous formations, and the hernia gas. Bulk tissue density dose calculation provides an accurate method of heterogeneous dose calculation. However, patients with advanced emphysema may require high‐resolution CT studies for accurate treatment planning. PACS number: 87.53.Tf
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A.,ViewRay Incorporated, Oakwood Village, OH, U.S.A
| | - Jonathan G Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A
| | - Chihray Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A
| | - Kenneth R Olivier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A
| | - James F Dempsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A.,ViewRay Incorporated, Oakwood Village, OH, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Prendergast B, Indelicato DJ, Grobmyer SR, Saito AI, Lightsey JL, Snead FE, Morris CG, Copeland EM, Mendenhall NP. The dynamic tumor bed: volumetric changes in the lumpectomy cavity during breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74:695-701. [PMID: 19168296 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2008] [Revised: 08/15/2008] [Accepted: 08/29/2008] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the magnitude of volume change in the postoperative tumor bed before and during radiotherapy, and to identify any factors associated with large volumetric change. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-six consecutive patients with early-stage or preinvasive breast cancer underwent breast-conserving therapy at our institution between June 2006 and October 2007. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the breast were obtained shortly after surgery, before the start of radiotherapy (RT) for treatment planning, and, if applicable, before the tumor bed boost. Postoperative changes, seroma, and surgical clips were used to define the tumor bed through consensus agreement of 3 observers (B.P., D.I., and J.L.). Multiple variables were examined for correlation with volumetric change. RESULTS Between the first and last scan obtained (median time, 7.2 weeks), the tumor bed volume decreased at least 20% in 86% of patients (n = 31) and at least 50% in 64% of patients (n = 23). From the postoperative scan to the planning scan (median time, 3 weeks), the tumor bed volume decreased by an average of 49.9%, or approximately 2.1% per postoperative day. From planning scan to boost scan (median interval, 7 weeks), the median tumor bed volume decreased by 44.6%, at an average rate of 0.95% per postoperative day. No single factor was significantly associated with a change in tumor bed volume greater than 20%. CONCLUSIONS The average postlumpectomy cavity undergoes dramatic volumetric change after surgery and continues this change during RT. The rate of change is inversely proportional to the duration from surgery. In this study no factors studied predicted large volumetric change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Prendergast
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610-0385, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hsi WC, Vargas C, Saito AI, Dempsey JF, Flampouri S, Li Z, Palta J. SU-GG-J-46: CINE-Magnetic Resonance Image Assessment of Intra-Fraction Prostate Motion. Med Phys 2008. [DOI: 10.1118/1.2961604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
23
|
Saito AI, Morris CG, Ito K, Watanabe F, Karasawa K, Mendenhall WM, Naoi Y. Comparing size evaluation methods for acoustic neuroma after stereotactic radiosurgery. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 25:339-45. [PMID: 17705004 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-007-0150-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2006] [Accepted: 04/04/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Acoustic neuroma tumor size may be evaluated using several methods. Here we investigate the variations among measuring techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of pre- and posttreatment magnetic resonance (MR) scans was performed on 15 acoustic neuroma patients with a history of stereotactic radiosurgery who had been followed for more than 2 years. Tumor size was measured on each MR scan using three methods, where the extracanalicular (EX) and intracanalicular (IN) portions were measured separately. We collected data on the largest diameter (M1), the square root of the product of the maximum anteroposterior and mediolateral diameter (M2), and the average for the maximum anteroposterior, mediolateral, and superoinferior diameters (M3). Size differences between follow-up MR scans separated by more than 2 years were calculated for each method, and we evaluated whether the tumors progressed, remained stable, or regressed. RESULTS A total of 154 follow-up pairs of EX and 115 follow-up pairs of IN showed a statistically significant difference for the number of each category among the three methods (P = 0.03, P < 0.01, respectively). The greatest category agreement was observed between the M2 and M3 methods. CONCLUSION A significant difference between the tumor size measuring methods was observed. To strengthen specificity when evaluating tumor size difference, a measuring method using two or more parameters is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Science Center, University of Florida, PO Box 100385, Gainesville, FL 32610-0385, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Saito AI, Karasawa K. [Adjuvant radiotherapy for the lymph node area of breast cancer]. Nihon Rinsho 2007; 65 Suppl 6:479-83. [PMID: 17682197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
|
25
|
Karasawa K, Ito K, Hirowatari H, Saito AI, Izawa H. [Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced breast cancer]. Nihon Rinsho 2007; 65 Suppl 6:402-6. [PMID: 17682184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kumiko Karasawa
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Berg muscle-based categorization of axillary lymph node location (commonly referred to as levels I, II, and III) was used extensively by pathologists and surgeons to describe the extent of axillary node dissection in breast cancer patients. However, its reproducibility with different arm positions and utility in 3-dimensional radiation treatment planning hasn't been tested. METHODS Computed tomography scans were observed in 16 patients in 2 positions: historical position (HP), ipsilateral arm abducted 90 degrees to the body axis; standard position (SP), arms above head. The volume, contents, and location of Berg lymph node levels (LNL) and the location of lymph nodes, surgical clips, pectoral muscles, and vascular structures relative to reference points were compared. RESULTS From HP to SP there was no difference in LNL volumes. However, if measured from an anatomic landmark, the third thoracic vertebra (T3), LNL position varied: level I, an average of 23.1 mm anteriorly, P < 0.01; level II, 7.5 mm medially, P = 0.04; level III, 18.8 mm medially, P = 0.05. Using T3 as a reference: pectoralis major and minor muscles displaced medially (23.9 mm, P < 0.01 and 7.5 mm, P = 0.09) and anteriorly (18.2 mm, P < 0.01 and 11.2 mm, P < 0.01); axillary (18.0 mm, P < 0.01), subscapular (25.4 mm, P < 0.01), and lateral thoracic (8.4 mm, P < 0.01) vessels displaced anteriorly; axillary vessels displaced also medially (15.1 mm, P = 0.03). Disagreements in LN coverage with changes in arm position were observed in 60% (LNs) and 66% (clips) for level II. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons, radiologists, and radiation oncologists should be aware that LNL coverage based on muscle boundaries varies significantly with arm position changes, making objective comparisons of information collected in different arm positions unreliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneyuko I Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0385, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|