Implementation of feedback-guided voluntary breath-hold gating for cone beam CT-based stereotactic body radiotherapy

Evaluating intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath-hold

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), and to investigate the adequacy of the current planning target volume (PTV) margins.

METHODS

Twenty-eight lung SBRT patients with DIBH were selected in this study. Among the lesions, twenty-three were at right or left lower lobe, two at right middle lobe, and three at right or left upper lobe. Post-treatment gated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was acquired to quantify the intra-fractional tumor shift at each treatment. These obtained shifts were then used to calculate the required PTV margin, which was compared with the current applied margin of 5 mm margin in anterior-posterior (AP) and right-left (RL) directions and 8 mm in superior-inferior (SI) direction. The beam delivery time was prolonged with DIBH. The actual beam delivery time with DIBH (Tbeam_DIBH) was compared with the beam delivery time without DIBH (Tbeam_wo_DIBH) for the corresponding SBRT plan.

RESULTS

A total of 113 treatments were analyzed. At six treatments (5.3%), the shifts exceeded the tolerance defined by the current PTV margin. The average shifts were 0.0 ± 1.9 mm, 0.1±1.5 mm, and -0.5 ± 3.7 mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The required PTV margins were determined to be 4.5, 3.9, and 7.4 mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The average Tbeam_wo_DIBH and Tbeam_DIBH were 2.4 ± 0.4 min and 3.6 ± 1.5 min, respectively. The average treatment slot for lung SBRT with DIBH was 25.3 ± 7.9 min.

CONCLUSION

Intra-fractional tumor motion is the predominant source of treatment uncertainties in CBCT-guided lung SBRT with DIBH. The required PTV margin should be determined based on data specific to each institute, considering different techniques and populations. Our data indicate that our current applied PTV margin is adequate, and it is possible to reduce further in the RL direction. The time increase of Tbeam_DIBH, relative to the treatment slot, is not clinically significant.

ESTRO-ACROP guideline: Recommendations on implementation of breath-hold techniques in radiotherapy

The use of breath-hold techniques in radiotherapy, such as deep-inspiration breath hold, is increasing although guidelines for clinical implementation are lacking. In these recommendations, we aim to provide an overview of available technical solutions and guidance for best practice in the implementation phase. We will discuss specific challenges in different tumour sites including factors such as staff training and patient coaching, accuracy, and reproducibility. In addition, we aim to highlight the need for further research in specific patient groups. This report also reviews considerations for equipment, staff training and patient coaching, as well as image guidance for breath-hold treatments. Dedicated sections for specific indications, namely breast cancer, thoracic and abdominal tumours are also included.

Deep inspiratory breath hold assisted by continuous positive airway pressure ventilation for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation hyperinflates the lungs and reduces diaphragmatic motion. We hypothesized that CPAP could be safely combined with deep inspiratory breath hold (CPAP-DIBH) during lung stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with stage-1 lung cancer or lung metastasis treated with CPAP-DIBH SBRT between 3/2017-5/2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient characteristics, treatment parameters, duration of breath holds in all sessions and tolerance to CPAP-DIBH were recorded. Local control (LC) was assessed from CT or PET-CT imaging. The distances between the tumor and mediastinal organs at risk (OAR) in centrally located tumors using either free breathing (FB) or CPAP-DIBH were compared. Toxicity was graded retrospectively.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with 71 lesions were treated with CPAP-DIBH SBRT. Indications for CPAP-DIBH were prior radiation (35/71, 65%), lower lobe location (34/71, 48%), multiple lesions (26/71, 36.6%) and proximity to mediastinal OAR (7/71, 10%). Patient characteristics were: F:M 43%: 57%; mean gross tumor volume 4.5cm³ (SD 7.9), mean planning target volume 20cm³ (SD 27), primary: metastatic lesions (7%:93%). Mean radiation dose was 52.5 Gray (SD3.5). Mean lung volume was 5292cm³ (SD 1106). Mean duration of CPAP-DIBH was 41.3s (IQR 31-46.8). LC at 2 years was 89.5% (95% CI 76-95.5). In patients with central lesions, the distance between the tumor and mediastinal OAR increased from 0.84cm (SD 0.65) with FB to 1.23cm (SD 0.8) with CPAP-DIBH (p=0.002). Most patients tolerated CPAP well and completed all treatments after starting therapy. Three patients did not receive treatment: 2 were unable to tolerate CPAP and 1 had syncope (pre-existing). Toxicity was grade 2 in 4/65 (6%) and grade 3 in 1/65 (1.5%). There was no grade 2 or higher esophageal or tracheal toxicities.

CONCLUSION

CPAP-DIBH assisted lung SBRT was tolerated well and was associated with minimal toxicity and favorable LC. This technique may be considered when treating multiple lung lesions, lesions located in the lower lobes or adjacent to mediastinal OAR.

Intrafraction target shift comparison using two breath-hold systems in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

Background and purpose

In lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) respiratory management is used to reduce target motion due to respiration. This study aimed (1) to estimate intrafraction shifts through a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) acquired during the first treatment arc when deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) was performed using spirometry-based (SB) or surface-guidance (SG) systems and (2) to analyze the obtained results depending on lesion localization.

Material and methods

A sample of 157 patients with 243 lesions was analyzed. A total of 860 and 410 fractions were treated using SB and SG. Averaged intrafraction shifts were estimated by the offsets obtained when registering a CBCT acquired during the first treatment arc with the planning CT. Offsets were recorded in superior-inferior (SI), left-right (LR) and anterior-posterior (AP). Significance tests were applied to account for differences in average offsets and variances between DIBH systems. Systematic and random errors were computed.

Results

Average offset moduli were 2.4 ± 2.2 mm and 3.5 ± 2.6 mm for SB and SG treatments (p < 0.001). When comparing SB and SG offset distributions in each direction no differences were found in average values (p > 0.3). However, variances were statistically smaller for SB than for SG (p < 0.001). The number of vector moduli offsets greater than 5 mm was 2.1 times higher for SG. Compared to other locations, lower lobe lesions moduli were at least 2.3 times higher.

Conclusions

Both systems were accuracy-equivalent but not precision-equivalent systems. Furthermore, the SB system was more precise than the SG one. Despite DIBH, patients with lower lobe lesions had larger offsets than superior lobe ones, mainly in SI.

Target coverage of daily cone-beam computed tomography in breath-hold image-guided radiotherapy for gastric lymphoma

Objectives

We evaluated retrospectively the daily target coverage using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in breath-hold image-guided radiotherapy (BH-IGRT) for gastric lymphoma.

Methods

BH-IGRT was performed using a prescribed dose of 30.6 Gy in 17 fractions for the whole stomach. We assessed the target coverage of the whole stomach on daily CBCT images [daily clinical target volume (CTV)], which was delineated individually by two observers. We evaluated V_95% (percentage of volume receiving ≥95% of the prescribed dose) of daily CTV.

Results

In total, 102 fractions from 6 patients were assessed. The mean V_95% of daily CTV was 97.2%, which was over 95%. In two of six patients, the V_95% of daily CTV was over 95% for either observer in all fractions. One patient had significant interobserver variation (p = 0.013). In 95 fractions (93%), the V_95% of daily CTV was over 95% for either observer.

Conclusion

Daily target coverage for CTV in BH-IGRT for gastric lymphoma seems to be favorable, even when using CBCT.

Advances in knowledge

A previous study ascertained good daily target coverage in BH-IGRT for gastric lymphoma using in-room CT. Even when using CBCT in our study, daily target coverage for CTV in BH-IGRT for gastric lymphoma seems to be favorable.

Geometric Reproducibility of Fiducial Markers and Efficacy of a Patient-Specific Margin Design Using Deep Inspiration Breath Hold for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Purpose

In patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the reproducibility of tumor positioning between deep-inspiration breath holds is unclear. We characterized this variation with fiducials at simulation and treatment and investigated whether a patient-specific breath-hold (PSBH) margin would help account for intrafraction variation at treatment.

Methods and Materials

We analyzed 20 consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent SBRT with deep-inspiration breath holds. At simulation, 3 additional breath-hold scans were acquired immediately after the contrast-enhanced planning computed tomography (CT) scan and used to quantify the mean and maximum variations in the simulation fiducial position (Sim_Var_avg and Sim_Var_max), as well as to design the internal target volume (ITV) incorporating a PSBH margin.

Results

At treatment, a mean of 5 breath-hold cone beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired per fraction for each patient to quantify the mean and maximum variations in the treatment fiducial position (Tx_Var_avg and Tx_Var_max). Various planning target volume (PTV) margins on the gross tumor volume (GTV) versus ITV were evaluated using CBCT scans, with the goal of >95% of fiducials being covered at treatment. The Sim_Var_avg and Sim_Var_max were 0.9 ± 0.5 mm and 1.5 ± 0.8 mm in the left-right (LR) direction, 0.9 ± 0.4 mm and 1.4 ± 0.4 mm in the anteroposterior (AP) direction, and 1.5 ± 0.9 mm and 2.1 ± 1.0 mm in the superoinferior (SI) direction, respectively. The Tx_Var_avg and Tx_Var_max were 1.2 ± 0.4 mm and 2.0 ± 0.7 mm in the LR direction, 1.1 ± 0.4 mm and 1.8 ± 0.6 mm in the AP direction, and 1.9 ± 1.0 mm and 3.1 ± 1.4 mm in the SI direction, respectively. The ITV was increased by 21.0% ± 8.6% compared with the GTV alone. The PTV margin necessary to encompass >95% of the fiducial locations was 2 mm versus 4 mm in both LR and AP and 4 mm versus 6 mm in SI for the ITV and the GTV, respectively.

Conclusions

The interbreath-hold variation is not insignificant, especially in the SI direction. Acquiring multiple breath-hold CT scans at simulation can help quantify the reproducibility of the interbreath hold and design a PSBH margin for treatment.

A preliminary investigation of re-evaluating the irradiation dose in hepatocellular carcinoma radiotherapy applying 4D CT and deformable registration

Purpose

To investigate the effect of breathing motion on dose distribution for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients using four‐dimensional (4D) CT and deformable registration.

Methods

Fifty HCC patients who were going to receive radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. All patients had been treated with transarterial chemoembolization beforehand. Three‐dimensional (3D) and 4D CT scans in free breathing were acquired sequentially. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was planned on the 3D CT images and maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. Thus, the 3D dose (Dose‐_3D) and MIP dose (Dose‐_MIP) were obtained, respectively. Then, the Dose‐_3D and Dose‐_MIP were recalculated on 10 phases of 4D CT images, respectively, in which the end‐inhale and end‐exhale phase doses were defined as Dose‐_3D‐EI, Dose‐_3D‐EE, Dose‐_MIP‐EI, and Dose‐_MIP‐EE. The 4D dose (Dose‐_4D‐3D and Dose‐_4D‐MIP) were obtained by deforming 10 phase doses to the end‐exhale CT to accumulate. The dosimetric difference in Dose‐_3D, Dose‐_EI3D, Dose‐_EE3D, Dose‐_4D‐3D, Dose‐_MIP, Dose‐_EIMIP, Dose‐_EEMIP, and Dose‐_4D‐MIP were compared to evaluate the motion effect on dose delivery to the planning target volume (PTV) and normal liver.

Results

Compared with Dose‐_3D, PTV D99 in Dose‐_EI3D, Dose‐_EE3D and Dose‐_4D‐3D decreased by an average of 6.02%, 1.32%, 2.43%, respectively (P < 0.05); while PTV D95 decreased by an average of 3.34%, 1.51%, 1.93%, respectively (P < 0.05). However, CI and HI of the PTV in Dose‐_3D was superior to the other three distributions (P < 0.05). There was no significant differences for the PTV between Dose‐_EI and Dose‐_EE, and between the two extreme phase doses and Dose‐_4D (P> 0.05). Negligible difference was observed for normal liver in all dose distributions (P> 0.05).

Conclusions

Four‐dimensional dose calculations potentially ensure target volume coverage when breathing motion may affect the dose distribution. Dose escalation can be considered to improve the local control of HCC on the basis of accurately predicting the probability of radiation‐induced liver disease.

Technical Note: Evaluation of audiovisual biofeedback smartphone application for respiratory monitoring in radiation oncology

PURPOSE

Radiation dose delivered to targets located near the upper abdomen or thorax are significantly affected by respiratory motion, necessitating large margins, limiting dose escalation. Surrogate motion management devices, such as the Real-time Position Management (RPM™) system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), are commonly used to improve normal tissue sparing. Alternative to current solutions, we have developed and evaluated the feasibility of a real-time position management system that leverages the motion data from the onboard hardware of Apple iOS devices to provide patients with visual coaching with the potential to improve the reproducibility of breathing as well as improve patient compliance and reduce treatment delivery time.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The iOS application, coined the Instant Respiratory Feedback (IRF) system, was developed in Swift (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) using the Core-Motion library and implemented on an Apple iPhone® devices. Operation requires an iPhone®, a three-dimensional printed arm, and a radiolucent projector screen system for feedback. Direct comparison between IRF, which leverages sensor fusion data from the iPhone®, and RPM™, an optical-based system, was performed on multiple respiratory motion phantoms and volunteers. The IRF system and RPM™ camera tracking marker were placed on the same location allowing for simultaneous data acquisition. The IRF surrogate measurement of displacement was compared to the signal trace acquired using RPM™ with univariate linear regressions and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Periodic motion shows excellent agreement between both systems, and subject motion shows good agreement during regular and irregular breathing motion. Comparison of IRF and RPM™ show very similar signal traces that were significantly related across all phantoms, including those motion with different amplitude and frequency, and subjects' waveforms (all r > 0.9, P < 0.0001). We demonstrate the feasibility of performing four-dimensional cone beam computed tomography using IRF which provided similar image quality as RPM™ when reconstructing dynamic motion phantom images.

CONCLUSIONS

Feasibility of an iOS application to provide real-time respiratory motion is demonstrated. This system generated comparable signal traces to a commercially available system and offers an alternative method to monitor respiratory motion.

Feasibility of Optical Surface-Guidance for Position Verification and Monitoring of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold

Background

Reductions in tumor movement allow for more precise and accurate radiotherapy with decreased dose delivery to adjacent normal tissue that is crucial in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is an established approach to mitigate respiratory motion during radiotherapy. We assessed the feasibility of combining modern optical surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) to ensure and monitor reproducibility of DIBH and to ensure accurate tumor localization for SBRT as an imaging-guided precision medicine.

Methods

We defined a new workflow for delivering SBRT in DIBH for lung and liver tumors incorporating SGRT and IGRT with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) twice per treatment fraction. Daily position corrections were analyzed and for every patient two points retrospectively characterized: an anatomically stable landmark (predominately Schmorl's nodes or spinal enostosis) and a respiratory-dependent landmark (predominately surgical clips or branching vessel). The spatial distance of these points was compared for each CBCT and used as surrogate for intra- and interfractional variability. Differences between the lung and liver targets were assessed using the Welch t-test. Finally, the planning target volumes were compared to those of free-breathing plans, prepared as a precautionary measure in case of technical or patient-related problems with DIBH.

Results

Ten patients were treated with SBRT according this workflow (7 liver, 3 lung). Planning target volumes could be reduced significantly from an average of 148 ml in free breathing to 110 ml utilizing DIBH (p < 0.001, paired t-test). After SGRT-based patient set-up, subsequent IGRT in DIBH yielded significantly higher mean corrections for liver targets compared to lung targets (9 mm vs. 5 mm, p = 0.017). Analysis of spatial distance between the fixed and moveable landmarks confirmed higher interfractional variability (interquartile range (IQR) 6.8 mm) than intrafractional variability (IQR 2.8 mm). In contrast, lung target variability was low, indicating a better correlation of patients' surface to lung targets (intrafractional IQR 2.5 mm and interfractional IQR 1.7 mm).

Conclusion

SBRT in DIBH utilizing SGRT and IGRT is feasible and results in significantly lower irradiated volumes. Nevertheless, IGRT is of paramount importance given that interfractional variability was high, particularly for liver tumors.

Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy : Expert review group consensus from the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy

This review details and discusses the technological quality requirements to ensure the desired quality for stereotactic radiotherapy using photon external beam radiotherapy as defined by the DEGRO Working Group Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy and the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The covered aspects of this review are 1) imaging for target volume definition, 2) patient positioning and target volume localization, 3) motion management, 4) collimation of the irradiation and beam directions, 5) dose calculation, 6) treatment unit accuracy, and 7) dedicated quality assurance measures. For each part, an expert review for current state-of-the-art techniques and their particular technological quality requirement to reach the necessary accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy divided into intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery in one single fraction (SRS), intracranial fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is presented. All recommendations and suggestions for all mentioned aspects of stereotactic radiotherapy are formulated and related uncertainties and potential sources of error discussed. Additionally, further research and development needs in terms of insufficient data and unsolved problems for stereotactic radiotherapy are identified, which will serve as a basis for the future assignments of the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The review was group peer-reviewed, and consensus was obtained through multiple working group meetings.

Evaluation of interbreath-hold lung tumor position reproducibility with vector volume histogram using the breath-hold technique

Tumor geometric reproducibility for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an important issue in the breath-hold (BH) technique. We investigated the inter-BH reproducibility of the tumor position in expiratory BH using our proposed vector volume histogram (VVH) method. Subjects comprising 14 patients with lung cancer who were treated with lung SBRT under expiratory BH conditions were monitored by the Abches system. Multiple computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to evaluate the inter-BH reproducibility of the tumor position at the expiratory BH in the simulation session. Gross tumor volume was delineated by a physician. Deformable image registration was used to deform the images from the 3 expiratory BH-CTs to the treatment planning expiratory BH-CT. To evaluate the inter-BH reproducibility of the tumor positions, we measured the largest motion extent within the organ of 3 dimensions (left-right, LR; anterior-posterior, AP; cranio-caudal, CC) and a 3D vector using the VVH method. The average and standard deviations of the inter-BH reproducibility of the tumor position in the LR, AP, and CC directions, and the 3D vector were 1.7 ± 0.5, 2.0 ± 0.7, 2.1 ± 0.7, and 2.7 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. Ten patients exhibited inter-BH displacements of the lung tumor >3 mm in the 3D vector. No displacement >5 mm was observed in any direction for all patients. Our study indicated that the inter-BH variation of the tumor position was small for lung cancer patients, using the Abches system and the VVH method.

Proton pencil beam scanning treatment with feedback based voluntary moderate breath hold

Introduction The aim of this article is to introduce a novel protocol for proton pencil beam scanning treatment with moderate deep inspiration breath hold (mDIBH) and report on our clinical implementation results. Methods Three computed tomography (CT) scannings to build the patient's anatomy model were performed during the patient's voluntary mDIBH. All 3 CT scans were used in the optimization during the treatment planning process. Both orthogonal kV imaging and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were implemented for patient alignment with BH prior to the treatment. The BH CBCT images were analyzed for BH reproducibility and the virtual total dose (VTD) retrospectively. To find the VTD, a series of deformable image registrations (DIR) were performed between CBCT and pCT. The effect of the variation of lung density on the dose distribution was also analyzed in the study. Results The values of the mean, standard deviation, maximum, and minimum of the tumor location difference between the CBCT and pCT were 1.9, 1.6, 4.7, and 0.0 mm, respectively. The percentage difference in D99% of CTVs between VTD and the nominal plan was within 1.5%. Conclusions The feedback-based voluntary moderate BH proton PBS treatment was successfully performed in our clinic. This study shows that there is a potential to implement the BH treatment widely in proton centers.

A retrospective 4D-MRI based on 2D diaphragm profiles for lung cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

4D-MRI, compared to 4D-CT, provides better soft-tissue contrast for target delineation. However, motion artefacts are often observed due to residual breathing variations. This study is to present a retrospective 4D-MRI reconstruction method based on 2D diaphragm profiles to improve the quality of 4D-MR images in the presence of significant breathing variations.

METHODS

The proposed 4D-MRI reconstruction method utilized diaphragm profiles (2D cine images on a single sagittal plan at the peak diaphragm) in conjunction with 4D-MR scans (2D-cine images on multiple pre-determined coronal planes along the anterior-posterior direction over a volume of interest). The diaphragm profile images were exploited to sort the 4D-MR scans by matching respiratory amplitude of diaphragm on the 4D-MR scans to the diaphragm profiles. To evaluate reconstructed 4D-MR images (ten 3D-MR images), sagittal images on ten 3D-MR images under free breathing (FB) and respiratory guidance (GB) were compared with diaphragm profile images (reference) from 13 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Forty-four 4D-MR scan datasets were successfully reconstructed without distinct respiratory-related motion artefacts even with the presence of breathing variation. The differences in diaphragm profiles between the reference and corresponding reconstructed images in the mean of root mean square were similar between FB (3.5 mm) and GB (3.0 mm), confirming that the 4D-MRI reconstruction method was effective even with significant breathing variation.

CONCLUSIONS

The diaphragm profiles were utilized to reconstruct 4D-MR images with spatial reliability and a fixed scan time under FB and GB. Our method can provide reliable 4D information of thoracic and abdominal regions for MRI-guided radiotherapy.

Effect of setup and inter-fraction anatomical changes on the accumulated dose in CT-guided breath-hold intensity modulated proton therapy of liver malignancies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of setup uncertainties including uncertainties between different breath holds (BH) and inter-fractional anatomical changes under CT-guided BH with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in patients with liver cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study considered 17 patients with liver tumors who underwent feedback-guided BH (FGBH) IMRT treatment with daily CT-on-rail imaging. Planning CT images were acquired at simulation using FGBH, and FGBH CT-on-rail images were also acquired prior to each treatment. Selective robust IMPT plans were generated using planning CT and re-calculated on each daily CT-on-rail image. Subsequently, the fractional doses were deformed and accumulated onto the planning CT according to the deformable image registration between daily and planning CTs. The doses to the target and organs at risk (OARs) were compared between IMRT, planned IMPT, and accumulated IMPT doses.

RESULTS

For IMPT plans, the mean of D_98% of CTV for all 17 patients was slightly reduced from the planned dose of 68.90 ± 1.61 Gy to 66.48 ± 1.67 Gy for the accumulated dose. The target coverage could be further improved by adjusting planning techniques. The dose-volume histograms of both planned and accumulated IMPT doses showed better sparing of OARs than that of the IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

IMPT with FGBH and CT-on-rail guidance is a robust treatment approach for liver tumor cases.

Advanced dose calculation algorithms in lung cancer radiotherapy: Implications for SBRT and locally advanced disease in deep inspiration breath hold

PURPOSE

Evaluating performance of modern dose calculation algorithms in SBRT and locally advanced lung cancer radiotherapy in free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH).

METHODS

For 17 patients with early stage and 17 with locally advanced lung cancer, a plan in FB and in DIBH were generated with Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA). Plans for early stage were 3D-conformal SBRT, 45 Gy in 3 fractions, prescribed to 95% isodose covering 95% of PTV and aiming for 140% dose centrally in the tumour. Locally advanced plans were volumetric modulated arc therapy, 66 Gy in 33 fractions, prescribed to mean PTV dose. Calculation grid size was 1 mm for SBRT and 2.5 mm for locally advanced plans. All plans were recalculated with AcurosXB with same MU as in AAA, for comparison on target coverage and dose to risk organs.

RESULTS

Lung volume increased in DIBH, resulting in decreased lung density (6% for early and 13% for locally-advanced group). In SBRT, AAA overestimated mean and near-minimum PTV dose (p-values < 0.01) compared to AcurosXB, with largest impact in DIBH (differences of up to 11 Gy). These clinically relevant differences may be a combination of small targets and large dose gradients within the PTV. In locally advanced group, AAA overestimated mean GTV, CTV and PTV doses by median less than 0.8 Gy and near-minimum doses by median 0.4-2.7 Gy. No clinically meaningful difference was observed for lung and heart dose metrics between the algorithms, for both FB and DIBH.

CONCLUSIONS

AAA overestimated target coverage compared to AcurosXB, especially in DIBH for SBRT.

Evaluation of a reproducible breath hold technique for the SABR treatment of lower lobe lung tumours

Aim

Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is a method of motion management used in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for lung tumours. An external gating block marker can be used as a tumour motion surrogate, however, inter-fraction gross target volume (GTV) displacement within DIBH occurs. This study measured this displacement during a reproducible breath hold regime. In addition, factors such as position of the gating block marker were analysed.

Methods and materials

A total of 121 cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCTs) from 22 patients who received DIBH SABR were retrospectively evaluated and the magnitude of inter-fraction GTV displacement was calculated for each fraction. This data was analysed to assess if any correlation existed between tumour displacement and variation in the gating block marker position on the patient, the amplitude of breath hold (BH) at computed tomography (CT), the amplitude of BH at treatment and the tumour location.

The measured tumour displacement was applied to the original planning CT to evaluate the dosimetric effect on surrounding organs at risk (OARs) using cumulative dose volume histograms (DVHs).

Results

BH amplitude was reproducible within 0·13±0·1 cm (mean±standard deviation). The magnitude of tumour displacement within BH ranged from 0 to 1·52 cm (0·41±0·28 cm). Displacement in the superior-inferior, anterior-posterior and left-right planes were 0·31±0·26 cm, 0·16±0·18 cm and 0·07±0·12 cm, respectively. No statistically significant correlation was detected between tumour displacement within DIBH and the factors investigated. The range of variation in OAR dose was −7·0 to +3·6 Gy with one statistically significant increase in OAR dose observed (oesophagus mean dose increasing by 0·16 Gy).

Findings

Reproducible BH was achievable across a range of patients. Inter-fraction GTV displacement measured 0·41±0·28 cm. Due to this low level of motion, the correction of soft tissue moves did not adversely affect OAR dose.

Definitive radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

•

Prognosis for patients with HCC and PVTT is historically poor.

•

Definitive RT may improve OS by prolonging the time to hepatic failure.

•

Our data suggest dose escalation may further improve OS.

•

Patients who received a BED >75 Gy had significantly better OS.

•

RT was well tolerated with no confirmed cases of radiation-induced liver disease.

Background

The purpose of this study is to review the results of radiation therapy (RT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal venous tumor thrombus (PVTT) in a Western patient population.

Methods

Thirty-four patients with HCC PVTT treated from 2007 to 2014 with RT were identified. Biologically effective dose (BED) was calculated for each patient, and greater than the median dose delivered (75 Gray (Gy)) was evaluated as a potential prognostic factor. Survival was compared and independent prognostic variables were evaluated by a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results

Twenty-six patients (76.5%) exhibited a radiographic response to RT, and 10 patients (29.4%) ultimately developed local failure. Local control, liver control, distant control and OS at one year were 57.1%, 36.4%, 55.2% and 57.4%, respectively. Patients who received a BED >75 Gy had a significantly better local control at 1 year (93.3% vs 45.6%; Log Rank p = 0.0184). Patients who received a BED >75 Gy also had significantly better median survival (24.7mo vs 6.1mo) and 1-year overall survival (76.5% vs 30.0%) when compared with BED ≤75 Gy (Log-Rank p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that RT should be considered for well-selected patients with HCC and PVTT for the purpose of improving local control and potentially prolonging the time to worsening venous obstruction and liver failure. When feasible, dose-escalation should be considered with a target BED of >75 Gy if normal organ dose constraints can be safely met.

Audiovisual biofeedback guided breath-hold improves lung tumor position reproducibility and volume consistency

Purpose

Respiratory variation can increase the variability of tumor position and volume, accounting for larger treatment margins and longer treatment times. Audiovisual biofeedback as a breath-hold technique could be used to improve the reproducibility of lung tumor positions at inhalation and exhalation for the radiation therapy of mobile lung tumors. This study aimed to assess the impact of audiovisual biofeedback breath-hold (AVBH) on interfraction lung tumor position reproducibility and volume consistency for respiratory-gated lung cancer radiation therapy.

Methods

Lung tumor position and volume were investigated in 9 patients with lung cancer who underwent a breath-hold training session with AVBH before 2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sessions. During the first MRI session (before treatment), inhalation and exhalation breath-hold 3-dimensional MRI scans with conventional breath-hold (CBH) using audio instructions alone and AVBH were acquired. The second MRI session (midtreatment) was repeated within 6 weeks after the first session. Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were contoured on each dataset. CBH and AVBH were compared in terms of tumor position reproducibility as assessed by GTV centroid position and position range (defined as the distance of GTV centroid position between inhalation and exhalation) and tumor volume consistency as assessed by GTV between inhalation and exhalation.

Results

Compared with CBH, AVBH improved the reproducibility of interfraction GTV centroid position by 46% (P = .009) from 8.8 mm to 4.8 mm and GTV position range by 69% (P = .052) from 7.4 mm to 2.3 mm. Compared with CBH, AVBH also improved the consistency of intrafraction GTVs by 70% (P = .023) from 7.8 cm³ to 2.5 cm³.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that audiovisual biofeedback can be used to improve the reproducibility and consistency of breath-hold lung tumor position and volume, respectively. These results may provide a pathway to achieve more accurate lung cancer radiation treatment in addition to improving various medical imaging and treatments by using breath-hold procedures.

Deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy for lung cancer: impact on image quality and registration uncertainty in cone beam CT image guidance

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the impact of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and tumour baseline shifts on image quality and registration uncertainty in image-guided DIBH radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients treated with daily cone beam CT (CBCT)-guided free-breathing (FB) RT had an additional CBCT in DIBH at three fractions. These CBCT scans were offline rigidly registered (on tumour) to FB and DIBH CT scans acquired at planning. All registrations were repeated to evaluate the intraobserver uncertainty. CBCT scans were scored on degree of streak artefacts and visualization of tumour and anatomical structures. We examined the impact of tumour baseline shift between consecutive DIBHs on CBCT image quality.

RESULTS

CBCT scans from 15 patients were analysed. Intraobserver image registration uncertainty was approximately 2 mm in both FB and DIBH, except for the craniocaudal direction in FB, where it was >3 mm. On the 31st fraction, the intraobserver uncertainty increased compared with the second fraction. This increase was more pronounced in FB. Image quality scores improved in DIBH compared with FB for all parameters in all patients. Simulated tumour baseline shifts ≤2 mm did not affect the CBCT image quality considerably.

CONCLUSION

DIBH CBCT improved image quality and reduced registration uncertainty in the craniocaudal direction in image-guided RT of locally advanced lung cancer. Baseline shifts ≤2 mm in DIBH during CBCT acquisition did not affect image quality. Advances in knowledge: DIBH RT has dosimetric advantages over FB; this work demonstrates an additional benefit of DIBH in terms of registration accuracy because of improved image quality.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for adrenal gland metastases: Factors influencing outcomes, patterns of failure, and dosimetric thresholds for toxicity

PURPOSE

We report our single-institution experience with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for adrenal metastasis and identify factors influencing outcomes, patterns of failure, and dosimetric thresholds for toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified patients with adrenal metastases treated with SABR from 2009 to 2015. Toxicity was evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Local failures were categorized as in-field, marginal, or out-of-field. New or progressive disease outside the treated adrenal gland was considered distant failure. Survival and time to local and distant failure were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated with a Cox proportional hazards model. Fisher's exact tests were used to compare toxicity between dosimetric thresholds.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with 49 adrenal metastases (84% from lung) were treated with SABR to a median prescribed dose of 60 Gy in 10 fractions. Median overall survival time was 19 months, and 1- and 2-year rates were 65% and 42%, respectively. Bilateral adrenal metastases were associated with worse overall survival (P = .01). Median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 6 months, with most progressions being distant failure (most often to brain or bone). PFS was better in patients with a solitary adrenal metastasis (P = .03). Median time to local failure was not reached; the 1-year freedom from local failure rate was 74%. Nine failures were in field and 1 was marginal; no local failures occurred in lesions treated with biologically equivalent doses of >100 Gy. No patient experienced grade 3-5 toxicity. Low-grade gastrointestinal toxicity was common, but grade 2 toxicity was avoided in patients with a maximum stomach-bowel point dose of ≤50 Gy (P = .03). Low-grade adrenal insufficiency was common with bilateral treatment.

CONCLUSION

SABR was well tolerated and resulted in good 1-year local control; PFS was promising for patients with solitary metastases. Low-grade toxicity was common, but can be minimized with strict dosimetric constraints.

Evaluation of gantry speed on image quality and imaging dose for 4D cone-beam CT acquisition

Background

This study investigates the effect of gantry speed on 4DCBCT image quality and dose for the Varian On-Board Imager®.

Methods

A thoracic 4DCBCT protocol was designed using a 125 kVp spectrum. Image quality parameters were evaluated for 4DCBCT acquisition using Catphan® phantom with real-time position management™ system for gantry speeds varying between 1.0 to 6.0°/s. Superior-inferior motion of the phantom was executed using a sinusoidal waveform with five second period. Scans were retrospectively sorted into 4 phases (CBCT-4 ph) and 10 phases (CBCT-10 ph); average 4DCBCT (CBCT-ave), using all image data from the 4DCBCT acquisitions was also evaluated. The 4DCBCT images were evaluated using the following image quality metrics: spatial resolution, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and uniformity index (UI). Additionally, Hounsfield unit (HU) sensitivity compared to a baseline CBCT and percent differences and RMS errors (RMSE) of excursion were also determined. Imaging dose was evaluated using an IBA CC13 ion chamber placed within CIRS Thorax phantom using the same sinusoidal motion and image acquisition settings as mentioned above.

Results

Spatial resolution decreased linearly from 5.93 to 3.82 lp/cm as gantry speed increased from 1.0 to 6.0°/s. CNR decreased linearly from 4.80 to 1.82 with gantry speed increasing from 1.0 to 6.0°/s, respectively. No noteworthy variations in UI, HU sensitivity, or excursion metrics were observed with changes in gantry speed. Ion chamber dose rates measured ranged from 2.30 (lung) to 5.18 (bone) E-3 cGy/mAs.

Conclusions

A quantitative analysis of the Varian OBI’s 4DCBCT capabilities was explored. Changing gantry speed changes the number of projections used for reconstruction, affecting both image quality and imaging dose if x-ray tube current is held constant. From the results of this study, a gantry speed between 2 and 3°/s was optimal when considering image quality, dose, and reconstruction time. The future of 4DCBCT clinical utility relies on further investigation of image acquisition and reconstruction optimization.

Geometric uncertainties in voluntary deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) increases lung volume and can potentially reduce treatment-related toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer. We estimated geometric uncertainties in visually guided voluntary DIBH and derived the appropriate treatment margins for different image-guidance strategies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventeen patients were included prospectively. An optical marker-based respiratory monitoring with visual guidance enabled comfortable DIBHs, adjusted to each patient's performance. All patients had three consecutive DIBH CTs at each of the treatment fractions 2, 16 and 31. DIBH reproducibility was evaluated as inter- and intra-fractional variations in lung volume, tumour position and differential motion between primary tumour and mediastinal lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Lung volume increased by median 60% in DIBH. Inter- and intra-fractional lung volume variations were median 2.1% and 1.1%, respectively. Inter- and intra-fractional uncertainties in 3D tumour position were 4.8 ± 2.8 mm and 1.7 ± 1.4 mm (mean ± SD). Inter- and intra-fractional differential motion was 4.8 ± 3.3 mm and 0.0 ± 1.1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

For single targets, visually guided voluntary DIBH radiotherapy is highly reproducible provided an image-guidance strategy with tumour registration is performed. If the primary tumour is separated from the mediastinal lymph nodes, inter-fractional differential motion remains a challenge and margins must be adapted to reflect the image registration strategy.

Implementation of an in-house visual feedback system for motion management during radiation therapy

In this Technical Note, we describe an in‐house video goggles feedback system assembled using several commercially available products. This goggle video feedback system is currently being used at University of Louisville and Mayo Clinic for both CT simulation and linac treatment delivery. The setup details, including specific recommendations, are provided, along with an alternative option for using the video goggles system.

PACS number: 07.07Hj

Deep Inspiration Breath Hold-Based Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Review

Several recent developments in linear accelerator-based radiation therapy (RT) such as fast multileaf collimators, accelerated intensity modulation paradigms like volumeric modulated arc therapy and flattening filter-free (FFF) high-dose-rate therapy have dramatically shortened the duration of treatment fractions. Deliverable photon dose distributions have approached physical complexity limits as a consequence of precise dose calculation algorithms and online 3-dimensional image guided patient positioning (image guided RT). Simultaneously, beam quality and treatment speed have continuously been improved in particle beam therapy, especially for scanned particle beams. Applying complex treatment plans with steep dose gradients requires strategies to mitigate and compensate for motion effects in general, particularly breathing motion. Intrafractional breathing-related motion results in uncertainties in dose delivery and thus in target coverage. As a consequence, generous margins have been used, which, in turn, increases exposure to organs at risk. Particle therapy, particularly with scanned beams, poses additional problems such as interplay effects and range uncertainties. Among advanced strategies to compensate breathing motion such as beam gating and tracking, deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) gating is particularly advantageous in several respects, not only for hypofractionated, high single-dose stereotactic body RT of lung, liver, and upper abdominal lesions but also for normofractionated treatment of thoracic tumors such as lung cancer, mediastinal lymphomas, and breast cancer. This review provides an in-depth discussion of the rationale and technical implementation of DIBH gating for hypofractionated and normofractionated RT of intrathoracic and upper abdominal tumors in photon and proton RT.

Ablative Radiotherapy Doses Lead to a Substantial Prolongation of Survival in Patients With Inoperable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Dose Response Analysis

PURPOSE

Standard therapies for localized inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) are ineffective. Advances in radiotherapy (RT) techniques and image guidance have enabled ablative doses to be delivered to large liver tumors. This study evaluated the effects of RT dose escalation in the treatment of IHCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients with inoperable IHCC were identified and treated with definitive RT from 2002 to 2014. At diagnosis, the median tumor size was 7.9 cm (range, 2.2 to 17 cm). Seventy patients (89%) received systemic chemotherapy before RT. RT doses were 35 to 100 Gy (median, 58.05 Gy) in three to 30 fractions for a median biologic equivalent dose (BED) of 80.5 Gy (range, 43.75 to 180 Gy).

RESULTS

Median follow-up time for patients alive at time of analysis was 33 months (range, 11 to 93 months). Median overall survival (OS) time after diagnosis was 30 months; 3-year OS rate was 44%. Radiation dose was the single most important prognostic factor; higher doses correlated with an improved local control (LC) rate and OS. The 3-year OS rate for patients receiving BED greater than 80.5 Gy was 73% versus 38% for those receiving lower doses (P = .017); 3-year LC rate was significantly higher (78%) after a BED greater than 80.5 Gy than after lower doses (45%, P = .04). BED as a continuous variable significantly affected LC (P = .009) and OS (P = .004). There were no significant treatment-related toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Delivery of higher doses of RT improves LC and OS in inoperable IHCC. A BED greater than 80.5 Gy seems to be an ablative dose of RT for large IHCCs, with long-term survival rates that compare favorably with resection.

Interfraction positional variation in pancreatic tumors using daily breath-hold cone-beam computed tomography with visual feedback

We assessed interfraction positional variation in pancreatic tumors using daily breath‐hold cone‐beam computed tomography at end‐exhalation (EE) with visual feedback (BH‐CBCT). Eleven consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent BH intensity‐modulated radiation therapy with visual feedback were enrolled. All participating patients stopped oral intake, with the exception of drugs and water, for >3 hr before treatment planning and daily treatment. Each patient was fixed in the supine position on an individualized vacuum pillow. An isotropic margin of 5 mm was added to the clinical target volume to create the planning target volume (PTV). The prescription dose was 42 to 51 Gy in 15 fractions. After correcting initial setup errors based on bony anatomy, the first BH‐CBCT scans were performed before beam delivery in every fraction. BH‐CBCT acquisition was obtained in three or four times breath holds by interrupting the acquisition two or three times, depending on the patient's BH ability. The image acquisition time for a 360° gantry rotation was approximately 90 s, including the interruption time due to BH. The initial setup errors were corrected based on bony structure, and the residual errors in the target position were then recorded. The magnitude of the interruptions variation in target position was assessed for 165 fractions. The systematic and random errors were 1.2 and 1.8 mm, 1.1 and 1.8 mm, and 1.7 and 2.9 mm in the left–right (LR), anterior–posterior (AP), and superior–inferior (SI) directions, respectively. Absolute interfraction variations of >5 mm were observed in 18 fractions (11.0%) from seven patients because of EE‐BH failure. In conclusion, target matching is required to correct interfraction variation even with visual feedback, especially to ensure safe delivery of escalated doses to patients with pancreatic cancer.

PACS number: 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.‐s, 87.55.Qr

Assessment of contrast enhanced respiration managed cone-beam CT for image guided radiotherapy of intrahepatic tumors

PURPOSE

Contrast enhancement and respiration management are widely used during image acquisition for radiotherapy treatment planning of liver tumors along with respiration management at the treatment unit. However, neither respiration management nor intravenous contrast is commonly used during cone-beam CT (CBCT) image acquisition for alignment prior to radiotherapy. In this study, the authors investigate the potential gains of injecting an iodinated contrast agent in combination with respiration management during CBCT acquisition for liver tumor radiotherapy.

METHODS

Five rabbits with implanted liver tumors were subjected to CBCT with and without motion management and contrast injection. The acquired CBCT images were registered to the planning CT to determine alignment accuracy and dosimetric impact. The authors developed a simulation tool for simulating contrast-enhanced CBCT images from dynamic contrast enhanced CT imaging (DCE-CT) to determine optimal contrast injection protocols. The tool was validated against contrast-enhanced CBCT of the rabbit subjects and was used for five human patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

In the rabbit experiment, when neither motion management nor contrast was used, tumor centroid misalignment between planning image and CBCT was 9.2 mm. This was reduced to 2.8 mm when both techniques were employed. Tumors were not visualized in clinical CBCT images of human subjects. Simulated contrast-enhanced CBCT was found to improve tumor contrast in all subjects. Different patients were found to require different contrast injections to maximize tumor contrast.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the authors' animal study, respiration managed contrast enhanced CBCT improves IGRT significantly. Contrast enhanced CBCT benefits from patient specific tracer kinetics determined from DCE-CT.

Interfractional variations of tumor centroid position and tumor regression during stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumor

Purpose. To determine interfractional changes of lung tumor centroid position and tumor regression during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods and Materials. 34 patients were treated by SBRT in 4-5 fractions to a median dose of 50 Gy. The CT scans acquired for verification were registered with simulation CT scans. The gross target volume (GTV) was contoured on all verification CT scans and compared to the initial GTV in treatment plan system. Results. The mean (±standard deviation, SD) three-dimension vector shift was 5.2 ± 3.1 mm. The mean (±SD) interfractional variations of tumor centroid position were −0.7 ± 4.5 mm in anterior-posterior (AP) direction, 0.2 ± 3.1 mm in superior-inferior (SI) direction, and 0.4 ± 2.4 mm in right-left (RL) direction. Large interfractional variations (≥5 mm) were observed in 5 fractions (3.3%) in RL direction, 16 fractions (10.5%) in SI direction, and 36 fractions (23.5%) in AP direction. Tumor volume did not decrease significantly during lung SBRT. Conclusions. Small but insignificant tumor volume regression was observed during lung SBRT. While the mean interfractional variations of tumor centroid position were minimal in three directions, variations more than 5 mm account for approximately a third of all, indicating additional margin for PTV, especially in AP direction.

Implementation of single-breath-hold cone beam CT guided hypofraction radiotherapy for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To analyze the feasibility of active breath control (ABC), the lung tumor reproducibility and the rationale for single-breath-hold cone beam CT (CBCT)-guided hypofraction radiotherapy.

METHODS

Single-breath-hold CBCT images were acquired using ABC in a cohort of 83 lung cancer patients (95 tumors) treated with hypofraction radiotherapy. For all alignments between the reference CT and CBCT images (including the pre-correction, post-correction and post-treatment CBCT images), the tumor reproducibility was evaluated via online manual alignment of the tumors, and the vertebral bone uncertainties were evaluated via offline manual alignment of the vertebral bones. The difference between the tumor reproducibility and the vertebral bone uncertainty represents the change in the tumor position relative to the vertebral bone. The relative tumor positions along the coronal, sagittal and transverse axes were measured based on the reference CT image. The correlations between the vertebral bone uncertainty, the relative tumor position, the total treatment time and the tumor reproducibility were evaluated using the Pearson correlations.

RESULTS

Pre-correction, the systematic/random errors of tumor reproducibility were 4.5/2.6 (medial-lateral, ML), 5.1/4.8 (cranial-caudal, CC) and 4.0/3.6 mm (anterior-posterior, AP). These errors were significantly decreased to within 3 mm, both post-correction and post-treatment. The corresponding PTV margins were 4.7 (ML), 7.4 (CC) and 5.4 (AP) mm. The changes in the tumor position relative to the vertebral bone displayed systematic/random errors of 2.2/2.0 (ML), 4.1/4.4 (CC) and 3.1/3.3 (AP) mm. The uncertainty of the vertebral bone significantly correlated to the reproducibility of the tumor position (P<0.05), except in the CC direction post-treatment. However, no significant correlation was detected between the relative tumor position, the total treatment time and the tumor reproducibility (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using ABC for single-breath-hold CBCT guidance is an effective method to reduce the PTV margin of hypofraction radiotherapy for lung cancer. Using ABC, the tumor position was significantly altered relative to the vertebral position. The reproducibility of the tumor position was affected by the vertebral bone but not by the relative tumor position or the total treatment time.

Self-management of patient body position, pose, and motion using wide-field, real-time optical measurement feedback: results of a volunteer study

PURPOSE

We present the results of a clinical feasibility study, performed in 10 healthy volunteers undergoing a simulated treatment over 3 sessions, to investigate the use of a wide-field visual feedback technique intended to help patients control their pose while reducing motion during radiation therapy treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An optical surface sensor is used to capture wide-area measurements of a subject's body surface with visualizations of these data displayed back to them in real time. In this study we hypothesize that this active feedback mechanism will enable patients to control their motion and help them maintain their setup pose and position. A capability hierarchy of 3 different level-of-detail abstractions of the measured surface data is systematically compared.

RESULTS

Use of the device enabled volunteers to increase their conformance to a reference surface, as measured by decreased variability across their body surfaces. The use of visual feedback also enabled volunteers to reduce their respiratory motion amplitude to 1.7 ± 0.6 mm compared with 2.7 ± 1.4 mm without visual feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of live feedback of their optically measured body surfaces enabled a set of volunteers to better manage their pose and motion when compared with free breathing. The method is suitable to be taken forward to patient studies.

Advantages of simulating thoracic cancer patients in an upright position

PURPOSE

To compare lung volume and respiratory motion in supine and upright positions to assess the potential advantages of treating thoracic cancer patients in an upright position.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multi-position MRI scanner (FONAR, Melville, NY) was used to take MRI images of 5 healthy volunteers in both supine and upright setup positions. In each case, a series of sagittal cine MR scans were acquired during normal respiration, followed by a volumetric scan taken during breath-hold at end of normal expiration. The trajectory of points inside the lung was automatically detected and tracked in the cine images and then analyzed using a deformable image registration technique together with a principal component analysis model. The exhale volume images were imported into a treatment planning system and lung volumes were delineated and compared for different setup positions.

RESULTS

The amplitude of motion for a set of landmark points in the lung volume ranged from 2 mm (distant from the diaphragm) to 29 mm (close to the diaphragm) in the superior-inferior direction. A linear regression to the amplitude of respiratory motion versus distance from the diaphragm for each volunteer showed that the motion was 3 mm less on average in the upright position than in the supine position, although there was variability among individuals. The average exhale lung volume was 27% (751 cm(3)) larger (range: 9%-53%, 250-1390 cm(3)) when volunteers were in the upright position compared with the supine position.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of motion inside the lung was smaller and the absolute lung volumes were much larger in the upright position than in the supine position, which suggests that treating thoracic patients in the upright position may allow for a reduction in the mean lung dose.

Hybrid MV-kV 3D respiratory motion tracking during radiation therapy with low imaging dose

A novel real-time adaptive MV-kV imaging framework for image-guided radiation therapy is developed to reduce the thoracic and abdominal tumor targeting uncertainty caused by respiration-induced intrafraction motion with ultra-low patient imaging dose. In our method, continuous stereoscopic MV-kV imaging is used at the beginning of a radiation therapy delivery for several seconds to measure the implanted marker positions. After this stereoscopic imaging period, the kV imager is switched off except for the times when no fiducial marker is detected in the cine-MV images. The 3D time-varying marker positions are estimated by combining the MV 2D projection data and the motion correlations between directional components of marker motion established from the stereoscopic imaging period and updated afterwards; in particular, the most likely position is assumed to be the position on the projection line that has the shortest distance to the first principal component line segment constructed from previous trajectory points. An adaptive windowed auto-regressive prediction is utilized to predict the marker position a short time later (310 ms and 460 ms in this study) to allow for tracking system latency. To demonstrate the feasibility and evaluate the accuracy of the proposed method, computer simulations were performed for both arc and fixed-gantry deliveries using 66 h of retrospective tumor motion data from 42 patients treated for thoracic or abdominal cancers. The simulations reveal that using our hybrid approach, a smaller than 1.2 mm or 1.5 mm root-mean-square tracking error can be achieved at a system latency of 310 ms or 460 ms, respectively. Because the kV imaging is only used for a short period of time in our method, extra patient imaging dose can be reduced by an order of magnitude compared to continuous MV-kV imaging, while the clinical tumor targeting accuracy for thoracic or abdominal cancers is maintained. Furthermore, no additional hardware is required with the proposed method.