Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Protocol 0915: A Randomized Phase 2 Study Comparing 2 Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Schedules for Medically Inoperable Patients With Stage I Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Predicting radiation-induced immune suppression in lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is known to modulate the immune system and contribute to the generation of anti-tumor T cells and stimulate T cell infiltration into tumors. Radiation-induced immune suppression (RIIS) is a side effect of radiation therapy that can decrease immunological function by killing naive T cells as well as SBRT-induced newly created effector T cells, suppressing the immune response to tumors and increasing susceptibility to infections.

PURPOSE

RIIS varies substantially among patients and it is currently unclear what drives this variability. Models that can accurately predict RIIS in near real time based on treatment plan characteristics would allow treatment planners to maintain current protocol specific dosimetric criteria while minimizing immune suppression. In this paper, we present an algorithm to predict RIIS based on a model of circulating blood using early stage lung cancer patients treated with SBRT.

METHODS

This Python-based algorithm uses DICOM data for radiation therapy treatment plans, dose maps, patient CT data sets, and organ delineations to stochastically simulate blood flow and predict the doses absorbed by circulating lymphocytes. These absorbed doses are used to predict the fraction of lymphocytes killed by a given treatment plan. Finally, the time dependence of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) following SBRT is modeled using longitudinal blood data up to a year after treatment. This model was developed and evaluated on a cohort of 64 patients with 10-fold cross validation.

RESULTS

Our algorithm predicted post-treatment ALC with an average error of0.24 ± 0.21 × 10 9 $0.24 \pm 0.21 \times {10}^9$ cells/L with 89% of the patients having a prediction error below 0.5 × 109 cells/L. The accuracy was consistent across a wide range of clinical and treatment variables. Our model is able to predict post-treatment ALC < 0.8 (grade 2 lymphopenia), with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 98%. This model has a ∼38-s end-to-end prediction time of post treatment ALC.

CONCLUSION

Our model performed well in predicting RIIS in patients treated using lung SBRT. With near-real time model prediction time, it has the capability to be interfaced with treatment planning systems to prospectively reduce immune cell toxicity while maintaining national SBRT conformity and plan quality criteria.

Cyclotron and linear accelerator generated scanning proton beams for lung cancer SBRT: Interplay effects and mitigations

BACKGROUND

Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for moving targets is known to be impacted by interplay effects between the scanning beam and organ motion. While respiratory motion in the thoracic region is the major cause for organ motion, interplay effects depend on the delivery characteristics of proton accelerators.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of different types of PBS proton accelerators and spot sizes on interplay effects, mitigations, and plan quality for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Twenty NSCLC patients treated with photon SBRT were selected to represent varying tumor volumes and respiratory motion amplitudes (median: 0.6 cm with abdominal compression) for this retrospective study. For each patient, plans were created using: (1) cyclotron-generated proton beams (CPB) with spot sizes of σ = 2.7-7.0 mm; (2) linear accelerator proton beams (LPB) (σ = 2.9-5.5 mm); and (3) linear accelerator proton minibeams (LPMB) (σ = 0.9-3.9 mm). The energy switching time is one second for CPB, and 0.005 s for LPMB and LPB. Plans were robustly optimized on the gross tumor volume (GTV) using each individual phase of four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans. Initially, single-field optimization (SFO) plans were evaluated; if the plan quality did not meet the dosimetric requirement, multi-field optimization (MFO) was used. MFO plans were created for all patients for comparisons. For each patient, all plans were normalized to have the same dose received by 99% of the GTV. Interplay effects were evaluated by computing the dose on 10 breathing phases, based on the spot distribution. Volumetric repainting (VR) was performed 2-6 times for each plan. We compared volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V100%RX) of the GTV, and normal lung V20Gy.

RESULTS

Twelve of 20 plans can be optimized sufficiently with SFO. SFO plans were less sensitive to the interplay effect compared to MFO plans in terms of target coverage for both LPB and LPMB. The following comparisons showed results utilizing the MFO technique. In the interplay evaluation without repainting, the mean V100%RX of the GTV were 99.42 ± 0.6%, 97.52 ± 3.9%, and 94.49 ± 7.3% for CPB, LPB, and LPMB plans, respectively. Following VR (2 × for CPB; 3 × for LPB; 5 × for LPMB), V100%RX of the GTV were improved (on average) by 0.13%, 1.84%, and 4.63%, respectively, achieving the acceptance criteria of V100%RX > 95%. Because of fast energy switch in linear accelerator proton machines, the delivery time for VR plans was the lowest for LPB plans, while delivery time for LPMB was on average 1 min longer than CPB plans. The advantage of small spot machines was better sparing in normal lung V20Gy, even when VR was applied.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of repainting, proton machines with large spot sizes generated more robust plans against interplay effects. The number of VR increased with decreasing spot sizes to achieve the acceptance criteria. VR improved the plan robustness against interplay effects for modalities with small spot sizes and fast energy changes, preserving the low dose sparing aspect of the LPMB, even when motion is included.

An integrated solution of deep reinforcement learning for automatic IMRT treatment planning in non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

To develop and evaluate an integrated solution for automatic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases.

Methods

A novel algorithm named as multi-objectives adjustment policy network (MOAPN) was proposed and trained to learn how to adjust multiple optimization objectives in commercial Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS), based on the multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (DRL) scheme. Furthermore, a three-dimensional (3D) dose prediction module was developed to generate the patient-specific initial optimization objectives to reduce the overall exploration space during MOAPN training. 114 previously treated NSCLC cases suitable for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were selected from the clinical database. 87 cases were used for the model training, and the remaining 27 cases for evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of MOAPN in automatic treatment planning.

Results

For all tested cases, the average number of adjustment steps was 21 ± 5.9 (mean ± 1 standard deviation). Compared with the MOAPN initial plans, the actual dose of chest wall, spinal cord, heart, lung (affected side), esophagus and bronchus in the MOAPN final plans reduced by 14.5%, 11.6%, 4.7%, 16.7%, 1.6% and 7.7%, respectively. The dose result of OARs in the MOAPN final plans was similar to those in the clinical plans. The complete automatic treatment plan for a new case was generated based on the integrated solution, with about 5-6 min.

Conclusion

We successfully developed an integrated solution for automatic treatment planning. Using the 3D dose prediction module to obtain the patient-specific optimization objectives, MOAPN formed action-value policy can simultaneously adjust multiple objectives to obtain a high-quality plan in a shorter time. This integrated solution contributes to improving the efficiency of the overall planning workflow and reducing the variation of plan quality in different regions and treatment centers. Although improvement is warranted, this proof-of-concept study has demonstrated the feasibility of this integrated solution in automatic treatment planning based on the Eclipse TPS.

How Does the Gradient Measure of the Lung SBRT Treatment Plan Depend on the Tumor Volume and Shape?

Purpose

Gradient measure (GM) is a critical index related to normal tissue sparing in radiosurgery. This study aims to describe the dependence of GM on target volume and target shape for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment plans.

Methods

A total of 307 peripheral and 119 central lung SBRT treatment plans were enrolled for this study. A least-squares regression was used for data analysis. First, the equations with different functional forms were established to determine the dependence of GM on a univariaty (V_P or Sp) and bivariaty (V_P and Sp), respectively. Then, the correlation coefficients and p-values of variables for all equations were compared and analyzed to determine the dependence of GM on PTV volume (VP) and sphericity (Sp).

Results

The power equations had the highest coefficient of determination (R²) in the dependence results of GM on univariate V_P. The equations were GM = 0.674 V P 0.178 and GM = 0.660 V P 0.185 for peripheral and central lesions, respectively. On the other hand, the R² of all functional forms were less than 0.25 when the relationship of GM versus univariate Sp was analyzed. Similarly, the power equation also obtained the highest R² in bivariaty V_P and Sp analysis, whether for central or peripheral. However, the R² of the bivariate equations were not improved compared with those of univariate equations. Moreover, the p-values of the variable Sp were greater than 0.05.

Conclusions

The GM of the lung SBRT plan is shape-independent and volume-dependent. The dependence of GM on PTV volume for peripheral and central lung cancer can be described by two different power equations. The results of this study can be used as a potential tool to assist dosimetric quality control during the radiosurgery process.

SBRT of ventricular tachycardia using 4pi optimized trajectories

PURPOSE

To investigate the possible advantages of using 4pi-optimized arc trajectories in stereotactic body radiation therapy of ventricular tachycardia (VT-SBRT) to minimize exposure of healthy tissues.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thorax computed tomography (CT) data for 15 patients were used for contouring organs at risk (OARs) and defining realistic planning target volumes (PTVs). A conventional trajectory plan, defined as two full coplanar arcs was compared to an optimized-trajectory plan provided by a 4pi algorithm that penalizes geometric overlap of PTV and OARs in the beam's-eye-view. A single fraction of 25 Gy was prescribed to the PTV in both plans and a comparison of dose sparing to OARs was performed based on comparisons of maximum, mean, and median dose.

RESULTS

A significant average reduction in maximum dose was observed for esophagus (18%), spinal cord (26%), and trachea (22%) when using 4pi-optimized trajectories. Mean doses were also found to decrease for esophagus (19%), spinal cord (33%), skin (18%), liver (59%), lungs (19%), trachea (43%), aorta (11%), inferior vena cava (25%), superior vena cava (33%), and pulmonary trunk (26%). A median dose reduction was observed for esophagus (40%), spinal cord (48%), skin (36%), liver (72%), lungs (41%), stomach (45%), trachea (53%), aorta (45%), superior vena cava (38%), pulmonary veins (32%), and pulmonary trunk (39%). No significant difference was observed for maximum dose (p = 0.650) and homogeneity index (p = 0.156) for the PTV. Average values of conformity number were 0.86 ± 0.05 and 0.77 ± 0.09 for the conventional and 4pi optimized plans respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

4pi optimized trajectories provided significant reduction to mean and median doses to cardiac structures close to the target but did not decrease maximum dose. Significant improvement in maximum, mean and median doses for noncardiac OARs makes 4pi optimized trajectories a suitable delivery technique for treating VT.

Dosimetric evaluation of SBRT treatment plans of non-central lung tumours: clinical experience

Objectives:

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women in North America. Surgery is usually the primary treatment option for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, for patients who may not be suitable candidates for surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an alternative method of treatment. SBRT has proven to be an effective technique for treating NSCLC patients by focally administering high radiation dose to the tumour with acceptable risk of toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. The goal of this comprehensive retrospective dosimetric study is to compare the dosimetric parameters between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung SBRT treatment plans for two prescription doses.

Methods:

We retrospectively analysed and compared lung SBRT treatment plans of 263 patients treated with either a 3DCRT non-coplanar or with 2–3 VMAT arcs technique at 48 Gy in 4 fractions (48 Gy/4) or 50 Gy in 5 fractions (50 Gy/5) prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV), typically encompassing the 80% isodose volume. All patients were treated on either a Varian 21EX or TrueBeam linear accelerator using 6-MV or 10-MV photon beams.

Results:

The mean PTV V95% and V100% for treatment plans at 48 Gy/4 are 99·4 ± 0·6% and 96·0 ± 1·0%, respectively, for 3DCRT and 99·7 ± 0·4% and 96·4 ± 3·4%, respectively, for VMAT. The corresponding mean PTV V95% and V100% at 50 Gy/5 are 99·0 ± 1·4% and 95·5 ± 2·5% for 3DCRT and 99·5 ± 0·8% and 96·1 ± 1·6% for VMAT. The CIRI and HI5/95 for the PTV at 48 Gy/4 are 1·1 ± 0·1 and 1·2 ± 0·0 for 3DCRT and 1·0 ± 0·1 and 1·2 ± 0·0 for VMAT. The corresponding CIRI and HI5/95 at 50 Gy/5 are 1·1 ± 0·1 and 1·3 ± 0·1 for 3DCRT and 1·0 ± 0·1 and 1·2 ± 0·0 for VMAT. The mean R50% and D2cm at 48 Gy/4 are 5·0 ± 0·8 and 61·2 ± 7·0% for 3DCRT and 4·9 ± 0·8 and 57·8 ± 7·9% for VMAT. The corresponding R50% and D2cm at 50 Gy/5 are 4·7 ± 0·5 and 65·5 ± 9·4% for 3DCRT and 4·7 ± 0·7 and 60·0 ± 7·2% for VMAT.

Conclusion:

The use of 3DCRT or VMAT technique for lung SBRT is an efficient and reliable method for achieving dose conformity, rapid dose fall-off and minimising doses to the organs at risk. The VMAT technique resulted in improved dose conformity, rapid dose fall-off from the PTV compared to 3DCRT, although the magnitude may not be clinically significant.

On the optimal number of dose-limiting shells in the SBRT auto-planning design for peripheral lung cancer

PURPOSE

The number of dose-limiting shells in the optimization process is one of the key factors determining the quality of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) auto-planning in the Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS). This study attempted to derive the optimal number of shells by evaluating the auto-plans designed with different number of shells for peripheral lung cancer patients treated with SBRT.

METHODS

Identical treatment technique, optimization process, constraints, and dose calculation algorithm in the Pinnacle TPS were retrospectively applied to 50 peripheral lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT in our center. For each of the patients, auto-plans were optimized based on two shells, three shells, four shells, five shells, six shells, seven shells, eight shells, respectively. The optimal number of shells for the SBRT auto-planning was derived through the evaluations and comparisons of various dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs), monitor units (MU), and optimization time of the plans.

RESULTS

The conformity index (CI) and the gradient index (GI) of PTV, the maximum dose outside the 2 cm of PTV (D2cm ), Dmax of spinal cord (SCmax ), the percentage of volume of total lung excluding ITV receiving 20 Gy (V20) and 10 Gy (V10), and the mean lung dose (MLD) were improved when the number of shell increased, but the improvement became not significant as the number of shell reached six. The monitor units (MUs) varied little among different plans where no statistical differences were found. However, as the number of shell increased, the auto-plan optimization time increased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that for peripheral lung SBRT plan using six shells can yield satisfactory plan quality with acceptable beam MUs and optimization time in the Pinnacle TPS.

Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients

PURPOSE

We observed that many of our helical therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans did not meet the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommended R50% (volume of 50% of the prescription dose/planning target volume), which characterizes the steepness of dose fall off. We hypothesized that despite not meeting R50%, helical therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans would confer similar local control and minimal side effects as previously reported using nonhelical treatment platforms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report a retrospective review of all consecutive patients treated off-protocol with stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral lung lesions from 2008 to 2013 utilizing helical therapy. Seventy-four patients (81 lesions and 79 plans) were treated with doses ranging from 48 to 60 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions prescribed to the edge of the planning target volume.

RESULTS

Forty-eight (61%) plans had major deviation from R50%. Only 1 (<1%) plan had a major deviation from the R100%. All plans had > 95% planning target volume coverage by prescription dose, 7(8.6%) plans with 121% to 133% maximum dose, and lung V20 Gy <10% in 70 (89%) plans. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years (95% confidence interval: 4.1-5.3), local control for all patients at 1, 2, and 5 years was 94.6%, 83.4%, and 74%, respectively. For patients with primary stage I-II lung cancer (n = 46), the 1, 2, and 5-year local control: 97.2%, 94.2%, and 86.9%; RC: 97.6%, 82.5%, and 69.5%; and DM: 3%, 16%, and 33.4%, respectively. Patients treated for lung metastases (n = 26) had worse local control at 1, 2, and 5 years: 94.4%, 69.3%, and 55.5%, respectively. Side effects were rare with 2 (3%) patients reporting chest wall pain and 6 (8%) patients experiencing radiation pneumonitis, including 1 patient who had grade 5 radiation pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Helical therapy delivers a safe and effective lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plan, despite not being able to meet RTOG's recommended R50 conformality constraint.

Evaluation of a template-based algorithm for markerless lung tumour localization on single- and dual-energy kilovoltage images

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a template-based matching algorithm on single-energy (SE) and dual-energy (DE) radiographs for markerless localization of lung tumours.

METHODS

A total of 74 images from 17 patients with Stages IA-IV lung cancer were considered. At the time of radiotherapy treatment, gated end-expiration SE radiographs were obtained at 60 and 120 kVp at different gantry angles (33° anterior and 41° oblique), from which soft-tissue-enhanced DE images were created. A template-based matching algorithm was used to localize individual tumours on both SE and DE radiographs. Tumour centroid co-ordinates obtained from the template-matching software on both SE and DE images were compared with co-ordinates defined by physicians.

RESULTS

The template-based matching algorithm was able to successfully localize the gross tumor volume within 5 mm on 70% (52/74) of the SE images vs 91% (66/74) of the DE images (p < 0.01). The mean vector differences between the co-ordinates of the template matched by the algorithm and the co-ordinates of the physician-defined ground truth were 3.2 ± 2.8 mm for SE images vs 2.3 ± 1.7 mm for DE images (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Template-based matching on DE images was more accurate and precise than using SE images. Advances in knowledge: This represents, to the authors' knowledge, the largest study evaluating template matching on clinical SE and DE images, considering not only anterior gantry angles but also oblique angles, suggesting a novel lung tumour matching technique using DE subtraction that is reliable, accurate and precise.

To gate or not to gate - dosimetric evaluation comparing Gated vs. ITV-based methodologies in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) treatment of lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To compare retrospectively generated gated plans to conventional internal target volume (ITV)-based plans and to evaluate whether gated radiotherapy provides clinically relevant dosimetric improvements to organs-at-risk (OARs).

METHODS

Evaluation was performed of 150 stereotactic ablative radiotherapy treatment plans delivered to 128 early-stage (T1-T3 (<5 cm)) NSCLC patients. To generate gated plans, original ITV-based plans were re-optimized and re-calculated on the end-exhale phase and using gated planning target volumes (PTV). Gated and ITV-based plans were produced for 3 × 18 Gy and 4 × 12 Gy fractionation regimens. Dose differences between gated and ITV-based plans were analyzed as a function of both three-dimensional motion and tumor volume. OARs were analyzed using RTOG and AAPM dose constraints.

RESULTS

Differences between gated and ITV-based plans for all OAR indices were largest for the 3 × 18 Gy regimen. For this regimen, MLD differences calculated by subtracting the gated values from the ITV-based values (ITV vs. Gated) were 0.10 ± 0.56 Gy for peripheral island (N = 57), 0.16 ± 0.64 Gy for peripheral lung-wall seated (N = 57), and 0.10 ± 0.64 Gy for central tumors (N = 36). Variations in V20 were similarly low, with the greatest differences occurring in peripheral tumors (0.20 ± 1.17 %). Additionally, average differences (in 2Gy-equivalence) between ITV and gated lung indices fell well below clinical tolerance values for all fractionation regimens, with no clinically meaningful differences observed from the 4 × 12 Gy regimen and rarely for the 3 × 18 Gy regimen (<2 % of cases). Dosimetric differences between gated and ITV-based methods did generally increase with increasing tumor motion and decreasing tumor volume. Dose to ribs and bronchial tree were slightly higher in gated plans compared to ITV-based plans and slightly lower for esophagus, heart, spinal cord, and trachea.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of 150 SABR-based lung cancer treatment plans did not show a substantial benefit for the gating regimen when compared to ITV-based treatment plans. Small benefits were observed only for the largest tumor motion (exceeding 2 cm) and the high dose treatment regimen (3 × 18 Gy), though these benefits did not appear to be clinically relevant.

Ablative Approaches for Pulmonary Metastases

Pulmonary metastases are common in patients with cancer for which surgery is considered a standard approach in appropriately selected patients. A number of patients are not candidates for surgery due to a medical comorbidities or the extent of surgery required. For these patients, noninvasive or minimally invasive approaches to ablate pulmonary metastases are potential treatment strategies. This article summarizes the rationale and outcomes for non-surgical treatment approaches, including radiotherapy, radiofrequency and microwave ablation, for pulmonary metastases.

Improving Delivery Accuracy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to a Moving Tumor Using Simplified Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

PURPOSE

To develop a simplified volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique for more accurate dose delivery in thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For each of the 22 lung SBRT cases treated with respiratory-gated VMAT, a dose rate modulated arc therapy (DrMAT) plan was retrospectively generated. A dynamic conformal arc therapy plan with 33 adjoining coplanar arcs was designed and their beam weights were optimized by an inverse planning process. All sub-arc beams were converted into a series of control points with varying MLC segment and dose rates and merged into an arc beam for a DrMAT plan. The plan quality of original VMAT and DrMAT was compared in terms of target coverage, compactness of dose distribution, and dose sparing of organs at risk. To assess the delivery accuracy, the VMAT and DrMAT plans were delivered to a motion phantom programmed with the corresponding patients' respiratory signal; results were compared using film dosimetry with gamma analysis.

RESULTS

The plan quality of DrMAT was equivalent to that of VMAT in terms of target coverage, dose compactness, and dose sparing for the normal lung. In dose sparing for other critical organs, DrMAT was less effective than VMAT for the spinal cord, heart, and esophagus while being well within the limits specified by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Delivery accuracy of DrMAT to a moving target was similar to that of VMAT using a gamma criterion of 2%/2mm but was significantly better using a 2%/1mm criterion, implying the superiority of DrMAT over VMAT in SBRT for thoracic/abdominal tumors with respiratory movement.

CONCLUSION

We developed a DrMAT technique for SBRT that produces plans of a quality similar to that achieved with VMAT but with better delivery accuracy. This technique is well-suited for small tumors with motion uncertainty.

Treatment of Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective and well-tolerated noninvasive treatment for medically inoperable patients with peripheral non-small cell lung carcinoma. The term "peripheral" refers to lesions that lie 2 cm or more from the mediastinum and proximal bronchial tree and was instituted based on results from a specific dose and fractionation schedule. Improvements in immobilization, respiratory motion management, and image guidance have allowed for SBRT's highly conformal and accurate delivery of large radiation doses per fraction. Results from prospective and retrospective studies suggest that lung SBRT has superior outcomes when compared with conventionally fractionated treatments and is comparable with surgical resection. Investigations into the optimal SBRT dosing regimen for peripheral lesions are ongoing, with recent trials suggesting comparable efficacy between single and multiple fraction schedules. Chest wall toxicity after peripheral treatment is common, but it usually resolves with conservative management. Pneumonitis is less often observed after treatment of peripheral lesions, and changes in pulmonary function tests are minimal. Studies in the frail and elderly suggest that neither baseline pulmonary function tests nor age should preclude treatment. Recent technical developments have reduced delivery time and resulted in more conformal treatments. This review is on behalf of the IASLC Advanced Radiation Technology Committee.

Cardiac Exposure in the Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of Lung Cancer

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate the cardiac exposure in three cohorts of lung cancer patients treated with dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at our institution in the past seven years.

Methods and Materials

A total of 140 lung cancer patients were included in this institutional review board approved study: 25 treated with DCAT, 70 with IMRT and 45 with VMAT. All plans were generated in a same commercial treatment planning system and have been clinically accepted and delivered. The dose distribution to the heart and the effects of tumor laterality, the irradiated heart volume and the beam-to-heart distance on the cardiac exposure were investigated.

Results

The mean dose to the heart among all 140 plans was 4.5 Gy. Specifically, the heart received on average 2.3, 5.2 and 4.6 Gy in the DCAT, IMRT and VMAT plans, respectively. The mean heart doses for the left and right lung tumors were 4.1 and 4.8 Gy, respectively. No patients died with evidence of cardiac disease. Three patients (2%) with preexisting cardiac condition developed cardiac disease after treatment. Furthermore, the cardiac exposure was found to increase linearly with the irradiated heart volume while decreasing exponentially with the beam-to-heart distance.

Conclusions

Compared to old technologies for lung cancer treatment, modern radiotherapy treatment modalities demonstrated better heart sparing. But the heart dose in lung cancer radiotherapy is still higher than that in the radiotherapy of breast cancer and Hodgkin’s disease where cardiac complications have been extensively studied. With strong correlations of mean heart dose with beam-to-heart distance and irradiated heart volume, cautions should be exercised to avoid long-term cardiac toxicity in the lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Comparison of Single-fraction and Multi-fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-staged Pulmonary Oligometastases

AIM

To compare outcomes of single-fraction and multi-fraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for pulmonary metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review from two academic institutions of patients with one to three pulmonary metastases staged with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scans. For single-fraction SABR, 26 Gy was prescribed for peripheral targets and 18 Gy for central targets. In the multi-fraction cohort, 48 Gy/4 or 50 Gy/5 was prescribed for peripheral targets and 50 Gy/5 was prescribed for central targets. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were delivered using heterogeneity corrections. Conformity indices at an intermediate dose (R50%) and at a high dose (R100%) were used to assess a relationship with the planning target volume (PTV). Overall survival, local and distant progression and toxicity rates were analysed from the date of treatment completion.

RESULTS

Between February 2010 and June 2013, 65 patients with 85 pulmonary metastases were reviewed. The median follow-up was 2.1 years. Metastases most commonly originated from colorectal cancer (31%), followed by non-small cell lung cancer (25%). 3D-CRT was used in 52 targets, IMRT in 21 and VMAT in 12. 3D-CRT showed a lower median R50% (P=0.01), but a higher median R100% than IMRT/VMAT (P=0.04). The R50% index was inversely correlated to the PTV with all techniques (P=0.01). Overall survival at 1 and 2 years in all patients was 93% (95% confidence interval 87-100%) and 71% (95% confidence interval 58-86%), respectively. The 2 year freedom from local and distant progression was 93% (95% confidence interval 86-100%) and 38% (95% confidence interval 27-55%), respectively. There were no significant differences between overall survival (P=0 .14), time to distant progression (P=0.06) or toxicity rates (P=0.75) between single- and multi-fraction cohorts.

CONCLUSION

We report comparable local control, overall survival and toxicity rates between single-fraction and multi-fraction SABR treatments in patients with FDG-PET-staged pulmonary oligometastases. We propose a guideline for R50% conformity incorporating 3D-CRT/IMRT/VMAT techniques with heterogeneity corrected planning algorithms.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy

Extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been developed and refined over the last 25 years as a means to precisely deliver ablative doses of hypofractionated radiotherapy to small targets located outside of the cranial vault. SBRT has armed the radiation oncologist with a therapeutic approach that allows for intensification of both dose delivered and fractionation regimen employed. As a consequence, tumor control rates have improved to levels that previously have been associated only with surgical resection. Several prospective phase I and II studies have evaluated the use of SBRT for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), liver tumors, and spinal metastases. This article will give an overview of SBRT and evidence for its use in the most common sites of disease for which it is employed today.

Altered fractionation schedules in radiation treatment: a review

Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is delivered in 1.8- to 2.0-Gy fractions. With increases in understanding of radiation and tumor biology, various alterations of radiotherapy schedules have been tested in clinical trials and are now regarded by some as standard treatment options. Hyperfractionation is delivered through a greater number of smaller treatment doses. Accelerated fractionation decreases the amount of time over which radiotherapy is delivered typically by increasing the number of treatments per day. Hypofractionation decreases the number of fractions delivered by increasing daily treatment doses. Furthermore, many of these schedules have been tested with concurrent chemotherapy regimens. In this review, we summarize the major clinical studies that have been conducted on altered fractionation in various disease sites.

Treatment planning for SBRT using automated field delivery: A case study

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning and delivery can be accomplished using a variety of techniques that achieve highly conformal dose distributions. Herein, we describe a template-based automated treatment field approach that enables rapid delivery of more than 20 coplanar fields. A case study is presented to demonstrate how modest adaptations to traditional SBRT planning can be implemented to take clinical advantage of this technology. Treatment was planned for a left-sided lung lesion adjacent to the chest wall using 25 coplanar treatment fields spaced at 11° intervals. The plan spares the contralateral lung and is in compliance with the conformality standards set forth in Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group protocol 0915, and the dose tolerances found in the report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 101. Using a standard template, treatment planning was accomplished in less than 20 minutes, and each 10Gy fraction was delivered in approximately 5.4 minutes. For those centers equipped with linear accelerators capable of automated treatment field delivery, the use of more than 20 coplanar fields is a viable SBRT planning approach and yields excellent conformality and quality combined with rapid planning and treatment delivery. Although the case study discusses a laterally located lung lesion, this technique can be applied to centrally located tumors with similar results.

30 Gy or 34 Gy? Comparing 2 single-fraction SBRT dose schedules for stage I medically inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To review outcomes of 2 single-fraction lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) schedules used for medically inoperable early stage lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients in our institution have been treated on and off protocols using single-fraction SBRT (30 Gy and 34 Gy, respectively). All patients had node-negative lung cancer measuring ≤5 cm and lying ≥2 cm beyond the trachea-bronchial tree and were treated on a Novalis/BrainLAB system with the ExactTrac positioning system for daily image guidance.

RESULTS

For the interval from 2009 to 2012, 80 patients with 82 lesions were treated with single-fraction lung SBRT. Fifty-five patients (69%) and 25 patients (31%) received 30 Gy and 34 Gy, respectively. In a comparison of 30 Gy and 34 Gy cohorts, patient and tumor characteristics were balanced and median follow-up in months was 18.7 and 17.8, respectively. The average heterogeneity-corrected mean doses to the target were 33.75 Gy and 37.94 Gy for the 30-Gy and 34-Gy prescriptions, respectively. Comparing 30-Gy and 34-Gy cohorts, 92.7% and 84.0% of patients, respectively, experienced no toxicity (P was not significant), and had neither grade 3 nor higher toxicities. For the 30-Gy and 34-Gy patients, rates of 1-year local failure, overall survival, and lung cancer-specific mortality were 2.0% versus 13.8%, 75.0% versus 64.0%, and 2. 1% versus 16.0%, respectively (P values for differences were not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest single-fraction lung SBRT series yet reported. and it confirms the safety, efficacy, and minimal toxicity of this schedule for inoperable early stage lung cancer.

Feasibility of proton transmission-beam stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus photon stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung tumors: a dosimetric and feasibility study

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is being increasingly adopted in the treatment of lung tumors. The use of proton beam therapy can further reduce dose to normal structures. However, uncertainty exists in proton-based treatment plans, including range uncertainties, large sensitivity to position uncertainty, and calculation of dose deposition in heterogeneous areas. This study investigated the feasibility of proton transmission beams, i.e. without the Bragg peak, to treat lung tumors with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. We compared three representative treatment plans using proton transmission beams versus conformal static-gantry photon beams. It was found that proton treatment plans using transmission beams passing through the patient were feasible and demonstrated lower dose to normal structures and markedly reduced treatment times than photon plans. This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility of proton-based stereotactic ablative radiotherapy planning for lung tumors using proton transmission beams alone. Further research using this novel approach for proton-based planning is warranted.