Radiation Dose Escalation in Esophageal Cancer Revisited: A Contemporary Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base, 2004 to 2012

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Single-Center 10-Year Experience of Low Versus High-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

While neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered the standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, the optimal radiation dosing remains undefined. We aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes comparing patients treated with low-dose (LD-RT) versus high-dose (HD-RT) radiation therapy.

METHODS

Our institutional database was queried for patients with cT2-T4 or node-positive esophageal or GEJ cancer, who underwent surgery with neoadjuvant chemoradiation from 2010 through 2019. LD-RT and HD-RT regimens were defined as receiving total radiation dose ≤45 Gy and ≥50 Gy, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazard modeling, and logistical regression were utilized for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients were identified: 77 (27%) received LD-RT; 210 (73%) received HD-RT. Median follow-up from diagnosis to death or last contact was 37.1 months for the study cohort. Older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.03/year, p = 0.02) and year of diagnosis (OR 0.77/year, p < 0.001) were independently associated with receipt of HD-RT relative to LD-RT. Compared with HD-RT, LD-RT was associated with improved 5 year overall survival (OS; 55.1 vs. 44.1%, p = 0.03). On multivariate hazard modeling, receipt of HD-RT was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79, 95% 1.19-2.68, p = 0.005), disease-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.88, p = 0.02), and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.11-2.55, p = 0.01) compared with those treated with LD-RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite less frequent utilization than HD-RT strategies, LD-RT is associated with improved survival in those treated with neoadjuvant CRT for esophageal or GEJ cancer.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapyof different radiation doses and different irradiation fields for locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A randomized, multicenter, phase III clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal radiotherapy regimen, particularly in terms of total dose and planned range of irradiation field, remains unclear. This phase III clinical trial aimed to compare the survival benefits between different radiation doses and different target fields.

METHODS

This trial compared two aspects of radiation treatment, total dose and field, using a two-by-two factorial design. The high-dose (HD) group received 59.4 Gy radiation, and the standard-dose (SD) group received 50.4 Gy. The involved field irradiation (IFI) group and elective nodal irradiation (ENI) group adopted different irradiation ranges. The participants were assigned to one of the four groups (HD+ENI, HD+IFI, SD+ENI and SD+IFI). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS). The synergy indexwas used to measure the interaction effect between dose and field.

RESULTS

The interaction analysis did not reveal significant synergistic effects between the dose and irradiation field. In comparison to the target field, patients in IFI or ENI showed similar OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80-1.23, p = 0.930) and PFS (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.82-1.25). The HD treatment did not show significantly prolonged OS compared with SD (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.72-1.11, p = 0.318), but it suggested improved PFS (25.2 months to 18.0 months). Among the four groups, the HD+IFI group presented the best survival, while the SD+IFI group had the worst prognosis. No significant difference in the occurrence of severe adverse events was found in dose or field comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

IFI demonstrated similar treatment efficacy to ENI in CCRT of ESCC. The HD demonstrated improved PFS, but did not significantly improve OS. The dose escalation based on IFI (HD+IFI) showed better therapeutic efficacy than the current recommendation (SD+ENI) and is worth further validation.

Effects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer

PURPOSE

We explored the efficacy and influencing factors of chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 226 locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to analyse the impact of relevant factors. The endpoint was overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Compared with the radiotherapy group, the chemoradiotherapy group had a significant difference in the overall survival rate and the progression-free survival rate between 3 and 5 years (both p ​< ​0.05). The incidences of radiation pneumonitis and radiation oesophagitis were analysed, and the differences were not significant (all p ​> ​0.05). The incidence of haematological toxicity in the chemoradiotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the radiotherapy group (p ​= ​0.001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of haematological toxicity between the ≤65 and the >65 age groups (p ​< ​0.05). Tumour location, T stage, tumour length, tumour target volume, and short-term curative effect were the main factors affecting the prognosis (all p ​< ​0.05). T stage, gross tumour volume, and short-term curative effect were all independent factors affecting the prognosis (all p ​< ​0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with chemotherapy had significant survival benefits compared with radiotherapy alone. Haematological toxicity was the main adverse reaction. T-stage, gross tumour volume and short-term curative effect were independent factors influencing the prognosis.

The impact of radiation dose on the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To investigate the impact of radiation dose on the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy(dCCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) were searched for eligible studies. Studies that compared high-dose radiation(HD-RT) group with low-dose radiation(LD-RT) group using modern radiotherapy techniques for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients in dCCRT were identified. The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the odds ratios (OR) for clinical complete response (cCR), local-regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and grade≥3 AEs. Meta-analysis was performed when relevant data were available. Eleven studies involving 1943 patients were included for analyses. The results showed that the HD-RT group had better OS (pooled HR 0.78 [0.70, 0.87], p < .00001), PFS (pooled HR 0.72 [0.55, 0.94], p = .01), cCR (OR 1.52 [1.13, 2.05], p = .005), and LRF (OR 0.60 [0.45, 0.80], p = .0004). In addition, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of DM (OR 1.43 [1.00, 2.04], p = .05), grade 3-5 radiation pneumonitis (OR 1.38 [0.71, 2.68], p = .35), grade 3-5 radiation esophagitis (OR 1.36 [0.88, 2.10], p = .17), grade 3-5 other esophageal toxicities(stenosis/fistula/hemorrhage) (OR 1.22 [0.75, 2.00], p = .43), and treatment-related death (OR 1.40 [0.73, 2.68], p = .31). High-dose radiotherapy in definitive CCRT for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is associated with improved PFS, OS, cCR, and LC with no increase of grade≥3AEs. Simultaneously, we await the preliminary and final results of several ongoing dose-escalation randomized trials. Furthermore, future studies should provide personalized radiotherapy doses for these patients.

Do higher radiation doses improve survival for cervical esophageal squamous cell cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy? A propensity-score matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine whether higher doses of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) could improve the survival rate in patients of cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC), and lead to more severe treatment-related toxicity.

METHODS

The clinical records of stage I-IVA CESCC patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using IMRT between January 2013 and June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients in the high-dose (HD) group received ≥60 Gy and those in the standard-dose group received <60 Gy. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the confounding factors between both groups. The primary endpoint was over-survival (OS). progression-free survival (PFS), loco-regional control (LRC), and treatment-related toxicity were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients with CESCC were included. Patients with N1-3 nodal and stages III-IVA of the disease (P < 0.05) were included in the HD group. The differences in the OS, PFS, and LRC between the two groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.350, 0.063, and 0.099, respectively). After PSM, significantly longer PFS and LRC were observed in the HD group. The difference in OS between the two groups was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-related toxicity between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this PSM analysis suggested that higher doses may improve PFS and LRC for CESCC patients receiving CRT using OMRT, but do not demonstrate any statistically significant advantage in improving OS.

Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Brachytherapy for the Definitive Treatment of Esophageal Carcinoma

This study aims to investigate the effect of dose escalation with brachytherapy (BT) as an addition to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on local control and survival in esophageal cancer. From 2001 to 2020, 183 patients with locally limited or locally advanced esophageal cancer received definitive CRT with or without brachytherapy in a two-center study. External-beam radiotherapy was delivered at 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions, followed by a sequential boost to the primary tumor of 9 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions if indicated. Intraluminal high dose rate (HDR) Ir-192 brachytherapy was performed on 71 patients at 10 Gy in two fractions, with one fraction per week. The combined systemic therapy schedules used included 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil alone. Cisplatin was not administered in patients receiving brachytherapy. The median local progression-free survival was significantly extended in the BT group (18.7 vs. 6.0 months; p < 0.0001), and the median local control was also significantly prolonged (30.5 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.008). Overall survival (OS) significantly increased in the BT group (median OS 22.7 vs. 9.1 months, p < 0.0001). No significant difference in the overall rate of acute toxicities was observed; however, the rate of acute esophagitis was significantly higher in the BT group (94.4% vs. 81.2%). Likewise, the overall rate of late toxicities (43.7% vs. 18.8%) was significantly higher in the BT group, including the rate of esophageal stenosis (22.5% vs. 9.8%). There was no difference in the occurrence of life-threatening or lethal late toxicities (grades 4 and 5). Brachytherapy, after chemoradiation with single-agent 5-FU, represents a safe and effective alternative for dose escalation in the definitive treatment of esophageal cancer.

Low versus high dose of postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effect of different postoperative radiotherapy doses on the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

A total of 199 patients (aged 18-75 years) with locally advanced ESCC who underwent esophagectomy and postoperative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy at the Fujian Cancer Hospital between July 2008 and January 2018 were included. Based on the postoperative radiotherapy dose, the patients were divided into a low-dose group (50-50.4 Gy; median dose 50 Gy) and a high-dose group (>50.4 Gy; median dose 60 Gy). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens included PF (fluorouracil and cisplatin) and TP (paclitaxel and cisplatin) regimens. Patients were followed-up every 3 months in the first 2 years after surgery, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and then subsequently once a year. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The propensity-score matching (PSM) method was applied to identify a 1:1, well-balanced matched cohort with 33 patients in each group for survival comparison.

Results

Among the 199 patients enrolled in this study, 144 and 55 were in the low-dose and high-dose groups, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that pathological N classification, vascular tumor emboli, and postoperative radiotherapy dose were independent prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, all p < 0.05. Before PSM, the OS and the PFS of the low-dose group were significantly longer than those of the high-dose group, both p < 0.05. After PSM, better OS and PFS rates were observed in the low-dose group, both p < 0.05. The results showed that patients with pathological stages N0-2 or N3, negative surgical margins, and no vascular tumor emboli could obtain a significant benefit in both OS and PFS after treatment with a low dose of postoperative radiotherapy (50-50.4 Gy). In the subgroup with positive surgical margins, treatment with a low dose of postoperative radiotherapy offered a non-significant survival benefit compared to treatment with a high dose of postoperative radiotherapy.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that for patients with ESCC, the low-dose group (50-50.4 Gy) had a significantly higher OS and PFS than the high-dose group (>50.4 Gy). It was suggested that 50-50.4 Gy might be the recommended postoperative radiotherapy dose for ESCC patients.

High-dose versus standard-dose radiotherapy in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for inoperable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of high-dose (HD-RT) versus standard-dose radiotherapy (SD-RT) in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for inoperable esophageal cancer (EC) patients.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted by screening PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases before October 7, 2022 to collect controlled clinical studies of high-dose (≥ 60Gy) and standard-dose (50-50.4Gy) radiation in CCRT for EC. For statistical analysis, a fixed-effects model was used to synthesize HR and OR if there was no significant heterogeneity among studies; otherwise, a random-effects model was employed.

RESULTS

There were ten studies with 4625 patients included in the study, 3667 of whom (79.3%) were esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The HD-RT group had no significant benefits in overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74-1.05, P = 0.16) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.67-1.04, P = 0.12) in total EC patients, compared with SD-RT group. However, in ESCC subgroup analysis, compared with SD-RT group, a better OS was observed in the HD-RT group (HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.70-0.88, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the radiation dose of 50-50.4Gy, the increase of radiation dose (≥ 60Gy) did not achieve benefits in survival for inoperable EC patients receiving CCRT. However, in patients with ESCC, high dose (≥ 60Gy) of radiation probably improved OS.

High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy With Concurrent Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin for Patients With Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Superiority Trial

PURPOSE

The standard dose (SD) of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) remains 50.4 Gy in patients with esophageal cancer; a higher dose, when applied with conventional radiation therapy techniques, increases toxicities without improving survival. We investigated whether a high dose of 59.4 Gy using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) would improve survival without increasing toxicities.

METHODS

Patients with inoperable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) referred for dCRT were randomly assigned (1:1) to high-dose (HD) IMRT (59.4 Gy) or SD IMRT (50.4 Gy). Chemotherapy consisted of 6 cycles of concurrent weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin and a maximum of 2 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy. Nutritional intervention was implemented for patients with malnutrition on the basis of nutritional screening. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). Analyses were by modified intention to treat.

RESULTS

Between April 30, 2016, and April 30, 2019, 167 patients were enrolled at 9 participating centers in China. Seventy-one patients in the HD and 73 patients in the SD groups were included in the analysis; 86.8% of the patients completed radiation therapy and 70.1% received 5 or 6 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 36.0 months. The mOS was 28.1 and 26.0 months in the HD and SD arms, respectively (P = .54). A total of 7 treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related toxicities were observed in 62% and 68.5% of the patients in the HD and SD arms, respectively (P = .675).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with inoperable thoracic esophageal SCC, a dose of 59.4 Gy did not improve survival compared with the SD of dCRT using IMRT.

Prognostic Effect of the Dose of Radiation Therapy and Extent of Lymphadenectomy in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been used for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal dose of radiation therapy and the effect of lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant therapy on patient outcomes are uncertain. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery for ESCC. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who received radiation doses of 45.0 Gy (PF4500) and 50.4 Gy (PF5040). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the number of lymph nodes removed through lymph node dissection (LND). Data from a total of 126 patients were analyzed. No significant differences were found in 3-year OS and DFS between the PF4500 and PF5040 groups (OS: 45% versus 54%, p = 0.218; DFS: 34% versus 37%, p = 0.506). In both groups, no significant differences were found in 3-year locoregional-specific DFS between patients with a total LND number ≤17 and >17 (PF4500, 35% versus 50%, p = 0.291; PF5040 group, 45% versus 46%, p = 0.866). The PF5040 and PF4500 groups were comparable in terms of survival outcomes and local control. Although no additional survival benefits were identified, the extent of LND should not be altered according to the radiation dose.

[Dose-escalated radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A review of the literature]

For non-operable, localized esophageal cancer, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment. Currently, the radiation dose recommended is 50 to 50,4Gy. However, the optimal radiation dose remains controversial. Many studies have demonstrated that locoregional failure remains a common failure pattern, most likely to occur within the original gross tumor volume. Several retrospective studies have indicated that higher radiation dose may improve local control and survival while others failed to demonstrate improved oucomes. In three randomized trials (INT0123, ARTDECO, and CONCORDE), dose escalation did not improve locoregional control nor survival, establishing 50Gy as the standard chemoradiation dose for patients who will not undergo surgery. Here, we reviewed the results of dose escalation in the literature in the neoadjuvant and definitive settings.

Dose escalation based on 18F-FDG PET/CT response in definitive chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase III, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (ESO-Shanghai 12)

INTRODUCTION

Definitive chemoradiotherapy has established the standard non-surgical treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The standard dose of 50-50.4 Gy has been established decades ago and been confirmed in modern trials. The theorical advantage of better local control and technical advances for less toxicity have encouraged clinicians for dose escalation investigation. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have the potential to tailor therapy for esophageal patients not showing response to CRT and pioneers the PET-based dose escalation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The ESO-Shanghai 12 trial is a prospective multicenter randomized phase 3 study in which patients are randomized to either 61.2 Gy or 50.4 Gy of radiation dose by PET response. Both groups undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel/cisplatin regimen for 2 cycles followed by consolidation chemotherapy for 2 cycles. Patients with histologically confirmed ESCC [T1N1-3M0, T2-4NxM0, TxNxM1 (Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis only), (AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition)] and without any prior treatment of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery against esophageal cancer will be eligible. The primary endpoints included overall survival in PET/CT non-responders (SUV_max > 4.0) and overall survival in total population. Patients will be stratified by standardized uptake volume, gross tumor volume and tumor location. The enrollment could be ended, when the number of PET/CT non-responder reached 132 and the total population reached 646 for randomization.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been approved by the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Institutional Review Board. Trial results will be disseminated via peer reviewed scientific journals and conference presentations. Trial registration The trial was initiated in 2018 and is currently recruiting patients. Trial registration number NCT03790553.

A Phase III Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of 60 Gy versus 50 Gy Radiation Dose in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Inoperable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

In this multicenter phase 3 trial, the efficacy and safety of 60 Gy and 50 Gy doses delivered with modern radiotherapy technology for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIA‒IVA ESCC were randomized 1:1 to receive conventional fractionated 60 Gy or 50 Gy to the tumor and regional lymph nodes. Concurrent weekly chemotherapy (docetaxel 25 mg/m2; cisplatin 25 mg/m2) and two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy (docetaxel 70 mg/m2; cisplatin 25 mg/m2 days 1‒3) were administered.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients were analyzed for survival, and the median follow-up was 34.0 months. The 1- and 3-year locoregional progression-free survival (PFS) rates for the 60 Gy group were 75.6% and 49.5% versus 72.1% and 48.4%, respectively, for the 50 Gy group [HR, 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75‒1.35; P = 0.98]. The overall survival rates were 83.7% and 53.1% versus 84.8% and 52.7%, respectively (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73‒1.35; P = 0.96), whereas the PFS rates were 71.2% and 46.4% versus 65.2% and 46.1%, respectively (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73‒1.30; P = 0.86). The incidence of grade 3+ radiotherapy pneumonitis was higher in the 60 Gy group (nominal P = 0.03) than in the 50 Gy group.

CONCLUSIONS

The 60 Gy arm had similar survival endpoints but a higher severe pneumonitis rate compared with the 50 Gy arm. Fifty Gy should be considered as the recommended dose in CCRT for ESCC.

Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

Background Treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the best option for patients with locally advanced esophageal tumors considered unresectable or for patients without clinical conditions to undergo surgical treatment. Technological advances in radiotherapy in the last decades have made treatment more accurate with less toxicity, and the association with more effective systemic treatment has been gradually improving survival rates. Aim Evaluate clinical prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (ChT). Material and methods The clinical records of 60 patients treated from April 2011 until December 2019 with esophageal cancer considered unresectable and/or without clinical conditions for surgery, treated with definitive CRT, were analyzed. All patients had upper digestive endoscopy (UDE) with positive biopsy, neck, chest, and abdominal CT scan, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (PET-CT). Patients were followed with physical examination and CTs every three months in the first and second years and every six months from the third year of follow-up. UDE was made every three to six months after the end of the treatment or in suspicion of tumor recurrence. PET-CT was also performed in the follow-up when clinically necessary. Local and regional failure (LRF) was defined as abnormalities in the image tests within the planning target volume (PTV) and/or positive biopsy on UDE. Any other failure was defined as a distant failure (DF). PFS was defined in the record of the first tumor recurrence site and OS in the death record from the date of the start of treatment. Results The median age of the patients was 66 years (range: 33 to 83 years) and 46 patients (76.7%) were male. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most frequent histological type (85%). Most patients had tumors located in the mid-thoracic esophagus (53.3%) and stage III or IV (59.9%). All patients were treated using 3D (76.7%) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; 23.3%). The median total dose was 50.4Gy (41.4-50.4). All patients received platinum-based ChT concomitant with RT. The most common regimen used was carboplatin and paclitaxel, with a median of five cycles. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median PFS and OS were 10 and 20 months, respectively. LRF and DF as the first site of failure were observed in 22 (36.6%) and 26 (43.3%) patients, respectively. In the univariate analysis, tumor length lower than 2.6 cm, gross tumor volume (GTV) volume lower than 28 cm³, clinical tumor stages T1 and T2, clinical node stage N0, clinical prognostic stage groups I and II, and complete response to treatment, were statistically significant factors for better PFS and OS. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of clinical nodal stage N0 was related to better PFS (p=0.02). Conclusion Node clinical status was the most important clinical factor for PFS. Despite all the technical progress observed in radiotherapy, treatments concomitant with platinum-based chemotherapy are associated with high levels of LRF and DF. New strategies in systemic therapy and radiotherapy are necessary for improving outcomes.

A single-institution phase I feasibility study of dose-escalated IMRT for non-operative locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

•

Dose escalation with IMRT to 60 Gy for esophageal cancer is feasible.

•

Dose escalation with cisplatin/5-FU still results in significant toxicity.

•

Improved local control, but comparable survival compared to historical controls.

•

Pretreatment weight loss was found to be an independent predictor of poor survival.

•

Our dose escalation study is one of few with predominant adenocarcinoma histology.

Background and purpose

Radiation dose escalation to improve poor outcomes with chemoradiation in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is limited in part by increased toxicity. This Phase I study investigates the use of IMRT to improve tolerability of dose escalation.

Materials and methods

A single-institution, prospective study was conducted between 2007 and 2013 for individuals with inoperable esophageal carcinoma. Gross disease received 60 Gy in 30 fractions and at-risk sites received 54 Gy with simultaneous integrated boost. Concurrent chemotherapy primarily consisted of cisplatin/5-FU. The primary objective was to assess feasibility (<15% rate of grade 4–5 toxicity). Secondary objectives included assessment of overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and locoregional (LRR) and distant recurrence.

Results

Twenty-six patients were enrolled with median follow up of 17.6 months (range 0.1 to 152.0). The majority were AJCC 7th edition Stage III (54%), distal esophagus primary (81%), and adenocarcinoma histology (85%). Twenty-one patients (81%) completed their course of radiation therapy, while only 55% received 2 cycles of concurrent cisplatin/5-FU. One grade 5 and one grade 4 cardiac event occurred, both during chemoradiation and before receiving 50 Gy. The 3-year OS was 48.6% (95% CI: 32.5 to 72.2%) and PFS was 28.5% (95% CI: 14.6 to 55.5%). Half developed distant failure with LRR occurring in 10 patients (38%), isolated in 5 patients.

Conclusion

While feasibility was demonstrated, toxicity and compliance remained limiting factors with outcomes similar to historical controls. There remains an uncertain role for dose escalation in definitive management of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Definitive Simultaneous Integrated Boost Versus Conventional-Fractionated Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) and conventional fractionated-IMRT (CF-IMRT) for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

The data of 1173 patients treated with either CF-IMRT or SIB-IMRT for a curative intent from 2005 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create a well-balanced cohort of 687 patients at 1:2 ratio (237 patients in SIB-IMRT group and 450 patients in CF-IMRT group). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence pattern, and toxicity profiles were evaluated and compared between the two groups after PSM.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up time of 42.3 months (range, 3.0-153.2 months) for surviving patients, survival results were comparable in the two groups. After PSM, the 1-year, 2-year and 4-year OS rates in the SIB-IMRT and CF-IMRT groups were 70.0% vs. 66.4%, 41.9% vs. 41.7% and 30.2% vs. 27.6%, respectively (p = 0.87). The 1-year, 2-year and 4-year PFS rates were 48.4% vs. 49.1%, 31.2% vs. 29.4%, and 26.1% vs. 17.9%, respectively (p = 0.64). Locoregional recurrence (p = 0.32) and distant metastasis (p = 0.54) rates were also comparable between two groups. The toxicity profile was similar in the two groups. Multivariate analyses in the matched samples showed that female, concurrent chemotherapy and earlier clinical stage were independently associated with longer OS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

SIB-IMRT appears to be equivalent to CF-IMRT in treatment efficacy and safety, and could become an alternative option for definitive radiotherapy of ESCC.

Results of a Phase 1/2 Trial of Chemoradiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Radiotherapy Dose in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Importance

Effective treatment options for locally advanced esophageal cancer are limited, and rates of local recurrence after standard chemoradiotherapy remain high.

Objective

To evaluate toxic effects, local control, and overall survival rates after chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose to the gross tumor and nodal disease for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A phase 1/2, single-arm trial was conducted in 46 patients from April 28, 2010, to April 9, 2015 (median follow-up, 52 months [range, 2-86 months]), at a tertiary academic cancer center. Outcomes of the study patients were compared with those of 97 similar patients treated at the same institution from January 10, 2010, to December 5, 2014, as part of the interim analysis. Statistical analysis was performed from December 15, 2018, to February 12, 2019.

Interventions

Chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose (50.4 Gy to subclinical areas at risk and 63.0 Gy to the gross tumor and involved nodes, all given in 28 fractions) with concurrent docetaxel and capecitabine or fluorouracil.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Toxic effects, local (in-field) control, and overall survival rates.

Results

All 46 patients (11 women and 35 men; median age, 65.5 years [range, 37.3-84.4 years]) received per-protocol therapy, as intensity-modulated photon therapy (39 [85%]) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (7 [15%]); 11 patients (24%) ultimately underwent resection. No patients experienced grade 4 or 5 toxic effects; the 10 acute grade 3 toxic events were esophagitis (4), dysphagia (3), and anorexia (3) and the 3 late grade 3 toxic events were all esophageal strictures. The actuarial local recurrence rates were 22% (95% CI, 11%-35%) at 6 months, 30% (95% CI, 18%-44%) at 1 year, and 33% (95% CI, 20%-46%) at 2 years. Overall, 15 patients (33%) experienced local failure, at a median interval of 5 months (range, 1-24 months). The median overall survival time was 21.5 months (range, 2.3-86.4 months). Exploratory comparison with a 97-patient contemporaneous institutional cohort receiving standard-dose (non-simultaneous integrated boost) chemoradiotherapy showed superior local control (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.92; P = .03) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94; P = .02) in the group that received chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose for locally advanced esophageal cancer is well tolerated, with encouraging local control, and thus warrants further study.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01102088.

Randomized Study on Dose Escalation in Definitive Chemoradiation for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer (ARTDECO Study)

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of radiation dose escalation to the primary tumor on local tumor control in definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) for patients with esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with medically inoperable and/or irresectable esophageal carcinoma, referred for dCRT, were randomly assigned between a standard dose (SD) of 50.4 Gy/1.8 Gy for 5.5 weeks to the tumor and regional lymph nodes and a high dose (HD) up to a total dose of 61.6 Gy to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy consisted of courses of concurrent carboplatin (area under the curve 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m²) in both arms once a week for 6 weeks. The primary end point was local progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Between September 2012 and June 2018, 260 patients were included. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was present in 61% of patients, and 39% had adenocarcinoma (AC). Radiation treatment was completed by 94%, and 85% had at least five courses of chemotherapy. The median follow-up time for all patients was 50 months. The 3-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) was 70% in the SD arm versus 73% in the HD arm (not significant). The LPFS for SCC and AC was 75% versus 79% and 61% versus 61% for SD and HD, respectively (not significant). The 3-year locoregional progression-free survival was 52% and 59% for the SD and HD arms, respectively (P = .08). Overall, grade 4 and 5 common toxicity criteria were 12% and 5% in the SD arm versus 14% and 10% in the HD arm, respectively (P = .15).

CONCLUSION

In dCRT for esophageal cancer, radiation dose escalation up to 61.6 Gy to the primary tumor did not result in a significant increase in local control over 50.4 Gy. The absence of a dose effect was observed in both AC and SCC.

The efficacy and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-operable esophageal cancer

Objective

To report outcomes and toxicity in patients who received definitive concurrent chemoradiation (DCCRT) for non‐operable esophageal cancer (EC) in the modern era, and to identify markers of overall and disease‐free survival (OS/DFS).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable EC who received DCCRT at our institution between 1/2008 and 1/2019. Descriptive statistics were used to report disease‐control outcomes and CTCAE v4.0–5.0 toxicities. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression, and stepwise regression were used to identify associations with survival.

Results

At a median follow‐up of 19.5 months, 130 patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) (62%) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (38%) were evaluable (Stage II‐III: 92%). Patients received carboplatin/paclitaxel (75%) or fluorouracil‐based (25%) concurrent chemotherapy. Median total RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 44.7–71.4 Gy) delivered in 28 fractions (24–35). Locoregional and distant recurrence occurred in 30% and 35% of AC, and 24% and 33% of SCC, respectively. Median OS and DFS were 22.9 and 10.7 months in AC, and 25.7 and 20.2 months in SCC, respectively. On stepwise regression, tumor stage, feeding tube during DCCRT, and change in primary tumor PET/CT SUVmax were significantly associated with OS and DFS. Most severe toxicities were acute grade 4 hematologic cytopenia (6%) and radiation dermatitis (1%). Most common acute grade 3 toxicities were hematologic cytopenia (35%), dysphagia (23%), and anorexia (19%).

Conclusions

Treatment of non‐operable EC with DCCRT has acceptable toxicity and can provide multi‐year disease control for some patients, even in AC. Continued follow‐up and investigation in large studies would be useful.

Dose escalation of 3D radiotherapy is effective for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis (3JECROG R-03)

Background

To evaluate the impact of radiation dose escalation on overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with radical radiotherapy.

Methods

The clinical data of ESCC patients treated with three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy were collected from multiple institutes and retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received radiation dose ≥40 Gy were included. Radiation dose as a continuous variable was entered into the Cox regression model by using penalized spline regression to allow for a nonlinear relationship between radiation dose and OS to be identified. Patients were stratified into five groups according to EQD₂. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the OS in different dose groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the factors associated with OS.

Results

A total of 2,469 patients were included from 10 institutes across China. The median follow-up time was 58.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 56.4–60.2 months]. The median OS and PFS time were 24.3 months (95% CI: 22.5–26.2 months) and 18.0 months (95% CI: 16.4–19.6 months), respectively. The risk of death decreased sharply with a dose up to 60 to 62 Gy, before increasing slightly after the dose was elevated beyond 62 Gy. Multivariate analysis indicated that the chance of death was significantly decreased in patients who received radiotherapy doses of 60–62 Gy [P=0.028, hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73–0.98)], compared with those who received radiotherapy doses of 40–60 Gy.

Conclusions

Our results reveal radiation dose is a significant prognostic factor of survival for ESCC patients. Higher radiation dose contributes to much more favorable survival outcomes for ESCC patients receiving radical radiotherapy by modern techniques, and 60 Gy or above might be the most optimal radiation dose.

Stage III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients With Three-Dimensional Conformal or Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Aim: To evaluate long-term outcome and prognostic factors of stage III esophageal cancer after definitive radiotherapy using three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques.

Methods: Patients with T3N1M0/T4N0-1M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive radiotherapy from 2002 to 2016 in 10 Chinese medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated. Prognostic factors were analyzed by Log-rank test and multivariable Cox model.

Results: Survival data of 1,450 patients were retrospectively collected. With a median follow-up time of 65.9 months, 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 69.3, 36.7, and 27.7%, respectively, and PFS rates were 58.6, 32.7, and 27.4%, respectively. Univariable analyses showed that gender, age, lesion location, lesion length, largest tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, gross tumor volume, EQD2, short-term response, and concurrent chemotherapy were prognostic factors for OS. Multivariable analyses showed that lesion location, T-classification, GTV size, EQD2, and short-term response to RT were independent prognostic factors for OS, and tumor diameter, GTV size, and short-term response were independent prognostic factors for PFS.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that definitive radiotherapy using 3DCRT and IMRT provides promising outcomes for locally advanced ESCC.

Chemoradiotherapy Using Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel versus Cisplatin plus Fluorouracil for Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

BACKGROUND

Trimodality therapy (TMT) with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) using concurrent carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) followed by surgery is the standard of care for locoregional esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers. Alternatively, nCRT with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) can be used. Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with CP or CF can be used if surgery is not planned. In the absence of comparative trials, we aimed to evaluate outcomes of CP and CF in the settings of TMT and dCRT.

METHODS

A single-site, retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre to identify all patients who received CRT for locoregional esophageal or GEJ cancer. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression model. The inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used for sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2015, 93 patients with esophageal (49%) and GEJ (51%) cancers underwent nCRT (n = 67; 72%) or dCRT (n = 26; 28%). Median age was 62.3 years and 74% were male. Median follow-up was 23.9 months. Comparing CP to CF in the setting of TMT, the OS and DFS rates were similar. In the setting of dCRT, CP was associated with significantly inferior 3-year OS (36 vs. 63%; p = 0.001; HR 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2-7.7) and DFS (0 vs. 41%; p = 0.004; HR 3.6; 95% CI: 1.4-8.9) on multivariable and IPTW sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

TMT with CF and CP produced comparable outcomes. However, for dCRT, CF may be a superior regimen.

A multicenter prospective phase III clinical randomized study of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: 3JECROG P-02 study protocol

BACKGROUND

Since the development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), no prospective study has investigated whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (SIB-IMRT with 60 Gy) remains superior to radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) alone for unresectable esophageal cancer (EC). Furthermore, the optimal therapeutic regimen for patients who cannot tolerate concurrent chemoradiotherapy is unclear. We recently completed a phase I/II radiation dose-escalation trial using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), elective nodal irradiation, and concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable EC. We now intend to conduct a prospective, phase III, randomized study of SIB-IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. We aim to find a safe, practical, and effective therapeutic regimen to replace the conventional segmentation (1.8-2.0 Gy) treatment mode (radiotherapy ± chemotherapy) for unresectable EC.

METHODS

This two-arm, open, randomized, multicenter, phase III trial will recruit esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (stage IIA-IVB [UICC 2002]; IVB only with metastasis to the supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes). In all, 164 patients will be randomized using a 1:1 allocation ratio, and stratified by study site and disease stage, especially the extent of lymph node metastasis. Patients in the SIB arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy (95% planning target volume/planning gross tumor volume, 50.4 Gy/59.92 Gy/28 f, equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions = 60.62 Gy). Patients in the SIB + concurrent chemotherapy arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and a platinum-based drug (5-6 weeks). Four cycles of consolidated chemoradiotherapy will also be recommended. The primary objective is to compare the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival of the SIB + chemotherapy group and SIB groups. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, local recurrence-free rate, completion rate, and adverse events. Detailed radiotherapy protocol and quality-assurance procedures have been incorporated into this trial.

DISCUSSION

In unresectable, locally advanced EC, a safe and effective total radiotherapy dose and reasonable segmentation doses are required for the clinical application of SIB-IMRT + two-drug chemotherapy. Whether this protocol will replace the standard treatment regimen will be prospectively investigated. The effects of SIB-IMRT in patients with poor physical condition who cannot tolerate definitive chemoradiotherapy will also be investigated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03308552 , November 1, 2017).

The efficacy and safety of simultaneous integrated dose reduction in clinical target volume with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Compelling research to explore the effectiveness of simultaneous integrated dose reduction in clinical target volume (CTV) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIR-IMRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and treatment-related toxicity between SIR-IMRT and conventional IMRT (C-IMRT) in the treatment of ESCC.

Methods

From March 2010 to September 2016, the clinical data of 257 patients with ESCC who received definitive IMRT in the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Among these patients, 137 patients received C-IMRT with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions for planning target volume (PTV), while 120 patients received SIR-IMRT with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions for the planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) and a prescribed dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions for PTV. All of the patients received definitive IMRT with elective nodal irradiation. Locoregional control, survival, treatment toxicity and dose to organs at risk (OAR) were compared between the groups.

Results

Patients who received SIR-IMRT showed a similar locoregional failure rate compared to the C-IMRT group (27.5% versus 29.9%, P=0.668). The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.5%, 44.3%, 44.3% vs. 77.9%, 52.1%, 32.9% in the C-IMRT and SIR-IMRT groups, respectively (P=0.825). No significant differences were observed in PFS and LRRFS between the two groups (P=0.880 and P=0.216, respectively). The dose of lung V30 and the maximum dose of spinal cord in the C-IMRT group were significantly higher than those in the SIR-IMRT group (P=0.013, P=0.047). The incidence of acute radiation esophagitis was significantly lower in the SIR-IMRT group (P=0.046), although no statistical difference was observed in the incidence of acute severe adverse events between the two groups.

Conclusions

SIR-IMRT offers an effective and safe option for patients with unresectable ESCC who receive definitive RT. Further prospective and larger sample size studies are warranted to confirm our results.

High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of different radiation doses in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal carcinoma using modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by screening PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with prespecified searching strategy. Studies which compared high radiation dose group with low-dose radiation group using modern radiotherapy techniques for esophageal cancer patients in CCRT were identified. The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and the odds ratios (OR) for local-regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and toxicities were considered as the outcomes of interest. R 3.6.2 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twelve studies involving 10,896 patients were included for analyses. The results showed that the high-dose group had better OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.90, P = 0.0004) and the local-regional control (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46-0.76, P < 0.0001), especially for patients who were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The subgroup analyses further indicated that ≥ circa 60 Gy can significantly improve the OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.68-0.80, P < 0.0001) as well as the local-regional control (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.40-0.74, P < 0.0001) as compared with < circa 60 Gy. Another subgroup analysis comparing ≤ 50.4 Gy with > 50.4 Gy showed no substantial difference in OS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.93-1.03, P = 0.43). In addition, there are no significant differences between the two groups in grade 3-5 radiation pneumonitis (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.54-2.05, P = 0.89), grade 3-5 radiation esophagitis (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93-2.11, P = 0.11), treatment-related death (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.70-3.66, P = 0.27), and DM (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.92-1.59, P = 0.17). Conclusions: For esophageal carcinoma receiving CCRT with modern radiation techniques, evidence suggested that high-dose radiotherapy, especially ≥circa 60 Gy, had potentials to improve the OS and local-regional control without increase in severe toxicities when compared with low-dose radiotherapy. The result needs to be confirmed by randomized clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant and Definitive Radiochemotherapeutic Approaches in Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Evaluation of 122 Cases in Daily Clinical Routine

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common malignant tumor entity with increasing occurrence. The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC), particularly, is constantly rising in the Western world. The mainstays of therapy with curative intent for EC in advanced stages are neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (neoRCT) with surgery and definitive radiochemotherapy (defRCT).

METHODS

We examined our internal files to identify patients suffering from EC. Palliative cases were excluded. Statistical testing was performed by χ2 test, Student's t test, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two cases were included. Histology revealed squamous cell carcinoma in 92 cases and AC in 23 cases. Ninety-five patients underwent defRCT, 27 underwent neoRCT, and 114 (in both therapy regimes) received simultaneous chemotherapy. There was no difference in the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.654; HR 1.145; 95% CI 0.629-2.086) or and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.912) of patients who underwent neoRCT or defRCT. Median OS was 13.5 (2-197) months for defRCT patients and 19.5 (2-134) months for neoRCT patients (p = 0.751). Karnofsky index (KI) with a cut-off of 70% was strongest, but not a significant parameter for OS (p = 0.608) or PFS (p = 0.137).

CONCLUSION

defRCT is a valid and an equal alternative to neoRCT for patients suffering from EC. Selection of patients for therapy is of crucial relevance. Further studies and improvements in follow-up are needed when neoRCT has been completed before surgery, in order to spare the patient undergoing operative treatment if there is complete remission. The identification of valid markers urgently needed to limit treatment side effects.

Do Higher Radiation Doses with Concurrent Chemotherapy in the Definitive Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Improve Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: To investigate the effects and safety profile of radiation dose escalation utilizing computerized tomography (CT) based radiotherapy techniques (including 3-Dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton therapy) in the definitive treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT). Methods: All relevant studies utilizing CT-based radiation planning, comparing high-dose (≥ 60 Gy) versus standard-dose (50.4 Gy) radiation for patients with EC were analyzed for this meta-analysis. Results: Eleven studies including 4946 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 96.5% of patients diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The high-dose group demonstrated a significant improvement in local-regional failure (LRF) (OR 2.199, 95% CI 1.487-3.253; P<0.001), two-year local-regional control (LRC) (OR 0.478, 95% CI 0.309-0.740; P=0.001), two-year overall survival (OS) (HR 0.744, 95% CI 0.657-0.843; P<0.001) and five-year OS (HR 0.683, 95% CI 0.561-0.831; P<0.001) rates relative to the standard-dose group. In addition, there was no difference in grade ≥ 3 radiation-related toxicities and treatment-related deaths between the groups. Conclusion: Under the premise of controlling the rate of toxicities, doses of ≥ 60 Gy in CT-based dCCRT of ESCC patients might improve locoregional control and ultimate survival compared to the standard-dose dCCRT. While our review supports a dose-escalation approach in these patients, multiple ongoing randomized trial initial and final reports are awaited to evaluate the effectiveness of this strategy.

Lymphopenia and Radiation Dose to Circulating Lymphocytes With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

We hypothesized that radiation-induced lymphopenia could be predicted by the effective dose to the circulating immune cells (EDIC) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with trimodality therapy according to the Dutch ChemoRadiotherapy for Oesophageal cancer followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) trial regimen. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effect of EDIC on the degree of lymphocyte drop (lymphocyte nadir).

Methods and Materials

Patients with advanced nonmetastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated in a single tertiary cancer center from 2012 to 2018 were eligible for this study. All patients had to have a radiation therapy plan available for EDIC computation and received neoadjuvant chemoradiation according to the Dutch CROSS trial regimen before radical esophagectomy. The EDIC was calculated as a function of integral doses to the lung, heart, and total body with a verified mathematical model. The association between EDIC and lymphocyte nadir was studied, and the relationships of overall survival (OS) with lymphocyte nadir and EDIC were assessed using multivariable Cox regression model.

Results

This analysis included 92 eligible consecutive patients (77 men and 15 women). The mean EDIC was 2.8 Gy (range, 0.6-4.4). EDIC was significantly correlated with lymphocyte nadir (Spearman coefficient = –0.505; P < .01), and lymphocyte nadir was a significant independent factor for shorter OS (hazard ratio = 0.63; P < .001). Lymphocyte nadir was also the most significant factor in determining OS among other clinical parameters. Exploratory analysis showed significant OS differences between EDIC groups (<2, 2-4, and >4 Gy). The 2–year OS rates were 66.7%, 42.7%, and 16.7% for EDIC <2, 2 to 4, and >4 Gy, respectively.

Conclusions

There was a significant correlation between radiation dose to circulating immune cells and lymphocyte nadir, which in turn affected OS in patients with advanced nonmetastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by trimodality therapy.

Effect of modern high-dose versus standard-dose radiation in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on outcome of esophageal squamous cell cancer: a meta-analysis

Background and objectives

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94–05 has demonstrated that higher dose radiation didn’t improve outcome of patients with esophageal cancer (EC). However, several retrospective studies showed that a higher dose radiation based on modern radiotherapy techniques could improve overall survival (OS) and local control rate (LCR) of patients with EC, especially esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). As trials have provided updated and controversial data, we performed this updated meta-analysis to investigate whether high-dose (> = 60 Gy) radiotherapy in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) could yield benefit compared to standard dose radiotherapy.

Methods

A systematic literature search was carried out in the database of MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase. All studies published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2018 on the association between radiation dose and curative efficiency in EC were included in this meta-analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to evaluate the time-to-event data employing RevMan version 5.3.

Results

Eight articles with a total of 3736 patients were finally included. Results indicated that there was a significant benefit in favor of high dose radiotherapy (HD-RT) regarding OS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.72–0.84, p < 0.001; 2-year OS risk ratio (RR) = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.14–1.37, p < 0.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.001, HR = 0.7, 95%CI: 0.57–0.87) and LRFS (P < 0.001, HR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.36–0.74) .

Conclusions

HD-RT (> = 60 Gy) based on modern radiotherapy techniques in definitive CCRT appears to improve OS, PFS amd LRFS compared to the SD-RT in patients with ESCC.

Analyzing the impact of neoadjuvant radiation dose on pathologic response and survival outcomes in esophageal and gastroesophageal cancers

Background

The optimal neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) dose prior to esophagectomy is unknown. We compared patients receiving lower-dose RT (LD-RT) of 41.4-45 Gy versus those receiving higher-dose RT (HD-RT) of 50-54 Gy.

Methods

Patients with non-metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by esophagectomy were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and divided into LD-RT and HD-RT groups. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of HD-RT utilization and propensity score matching. Overall survival (OS) was compared between HD-RT and LD-RT groups using Cox regression. Logistic regression was performed with respect to pathologic complete response (pCR), positive surgical margins, postoperative mortality, and readmission rates.

Results

We identified 7,996 patients meeting inclusion criteria, of which 5,732 (71.7%) received HD-RT. At median follow-up of 3.3 years, 3-year OS was 48.7% for HD-RT versus 48.4% for LD-RT (P=0.734). pCR rates were 20.3% with HD-RT versus 16.3% with LD-RT [odds ratio (OR) 1.24; 95% CI: 1.06-1.44; P=0.006]. There were no statistically significant differences between HD-RT and LD-RT with respect to positive margins, 90-day postoperative mortality, or readmission rates. In a separate analysis of patients treated with CRT alone and no subsequent esophagectomy, HD-RT was associated with improved OS (HR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.78-0.88; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Our analysis suggests that 41.4-45 and 50-54 Gy dose regimens are similar in survival and postoperative outcomes. However, in cases of equivocal resectability, a higher RT dose of 50-54 Gy may be preferred.

Impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer underwent definitive radiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

The impact of sex on prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) who underwent definitive radiotherapy remained unclear. The present study aimed to determine the impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with ESCC underwent definitive radiotherapy.

Methods

Between January 2009 and December 2015, patients with ESCC underwent definitive radiotherapy in Shantou Central Hospital were included in this study. The Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PFS and OS were compared between female and male patients. The Cox regression model was used to identify prognostic factors. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to balance baseline characteristics between female and male patients.

Results

A total of 683 ESCC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy were included, with 497 male and 186 female patients. In the whole cohort, female patients had a significantly longer median PFS (14.0 months vs 10.6 months, P = 0.0001, HR = 0.688, 95% CI, 0.567–0.836) and OS (20.8 months vs 15.9 months, P = 0.0005, HR = 0.702, 95% CI, 0.575–0.857). In the matched cohort, female patients still had a significantly longer median PFS (13.5 months vs 11.6 months) and OS (19.6 months vs 16.1 months). Multivariate analysis showed that sex was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 0.746, 95% CI, 0.611–0.910, P = 0.004) and OS (HR = 0.755, 95% CI, 0.615–0.926, P = 0.007).

Conclusions

This present study indicated that sex was an independent prognostic factor in Chinese patients with ESCC underwent definitive radiotherapy, with better survival outcome for women than men. Efforts should be made to investigate the underlying biological mechanism.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1278-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Influence of Neoadjuvant Radiation Dose on Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy and Survival in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by resection is standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, however, a significant portion of these patients do not undergo surgical intervention. This study evaluates radiation dose and other factors associated with undergoing esophageal resection and their impact on outcomes including survival.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2010 and 15 were queried from the National Cancer Database and stratified into low-dose radiation (41.4 Gy) (LDR) or high-dose radiation (50.0 or 50.4 Gy) (HDR) groups. Multivariable Logistic and Cox Regression analyses were performed to investigate the effect of multiple variables on the likelihood of undergoing esophagectomy and overall survival, respectively. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 3633 patients met study criteria with 3005 (82.7%) undergoing esophagectomy. A greater proportion received HDR (3163 (87.1%)) than LDR (470 (12.9%)). The use of LDR increased from 4.7% (n = 22) in 2010 to 20.7% (n = 154) in 2015. Factors associated with undergoing esophagectomy included LDR, adenocarcinoma histology, and younger age. Radiation dosage did not impact overall survival, but undergoing esophagectomy was associated with improved survival. After propensity matching, a greater portion of the LDR group underwent esophagectomy (87.0 vs 81.1%, p = 0.013). There was no difference in R0 3 resection (93.2 vs 92.4%, p = 0.678) or complete pathologic response (19.3 vs 21.5%, p = 0.442) between LDR and HDR groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of LDR is increasing but still underutilized. LDR is associated with increased rates of esophagectomy without negatively impacting overall survival, R0 resection, or complete pathologic response.

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy alone for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year survival outcomes

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We conducted a phase II study to explore the effect of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-DCRT) alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. This study aimed to analyze the long-term survival outcomes.

METHODS

Between November 2004 and April 2007, 30 patients with thoracic esophageal SCC underwent late-course sequential boost 3-DCRT at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The planning target volume (PTV1) comprised a 1.2-1.5 cm lateral margin around the gross tumor volume and a 3.0 cm margin, superior and inferior to the gross tumor volume. PTV2 encompassed the gross tumor volume with a margin of 0.5-0.7 cm. The PTV1 dose delivered was 50 Gy, and the PTV2 dose was a boost dose of 16 Gy, resulting in a total dose of 66 Gy. No chemotherapy was administered.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 30 months for all patients, and 132 months for patients who were alive. The median overall survival was 27 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.9-35.0). The 2-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 56.6%, 33.3%, and 26.6%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 14 months (95% CI 7.7-20.2 months), and the 2-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival rates were 33.3%, 30.0%, and 26.6%, respectively. No severe late toxicity was observed in long-term survivors.

CONCLUSION

Late-course sequential boost 3-DCRT is safe and feasible with promising long-term outcomes for esophageal SCC.

High-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy for cervical esophageal cancer: Retrospective single-institution study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the role of definitive radiotherapy using higher-than-standard-dose radiation of 50 Gy for carcinoma of the cervical esophagus (CCE).

METHODS

We reviewed 79 patients with stage I-III CCE, treated between 2000 and 2012. Patients received 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrently and were divided into high-dose (≥59.4 Gy, n = 44) and standard-dose (<59.4 Gy, n = 35) groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 35 months for surviving patients. The high-dose group had significantly better 3-year local (90.0% vs 60.4%, P = .001) and locoregional (70.4% vs 45.3%, P = .04) control. Progression-free (45.4% vs 37.5%, P = .32) and overall (58.4% vs 49.1%, P = .69) survival rates were not different. High-dose radiation was an independent prognostic factor for locoregional control (P = .04). No differences in late toxicities (esophageal stenosis or tracheoesophageal fistula) were observed.

CONCLUSION

High-dose radiation for CCE improves local and locoregional control, without increasing severe toxicities.

Evaluating the optimal radiation dose for definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single institution experience

The optimal radiation dose for definitive chemoradiotherapy in inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been long debated. In this study, we evaluated the effect of doses greater than the conventional radiation dose (50.4 Gy) on tumor control, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).The database of patients diagnosed with inoperable ESCC from 2007 to 2015 was obtained from the cancer registry of Chi-Mei Medical Center. All categorical variables were compared using Chi-squared test. The risk of OS and DFS were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression, and Kaplan-Meier plots presented the trend of OS and DFS with log-rank tests used to compare differences. All significance levels were set at P < .05.A total of 84 patients were retrospectively analyzed, with 42 (50%) receiving >50.4 Gy and 42 (50%) receiving ≤50.4 Gy (50%) concurrently with chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed no significant differences between higher dose and conventional dose in OS (P = .21) and DFS (P = .26). Further dose analysis of <50, 50 to 50.4, 51 to 60, and >60 Gy showed no significant differences in OS or DFS. Higher doses conveyed no significant benefit on the failure pattern, either local regional failure or distant failure (P = .42). Major prognostic factors associated with better OS on multivariate analysis were stages I and II patients (P = .03) and radiation technique using arc therapy (P = .04). No acute toxicity of grade III or higher was recorded.The results of our study show that providing higher than conventional radiation doses concurrent with chemotherapy for inoperable ESCC does not impact OS or DSF, nor does it improve locoregional failure or distant failure. Although tumor response might be improved by radiation doses >50.4 Gy, the impact on OS and DFS remain to be studied.

Retrospective analysis of safety profile of high-dose concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety profile and efficacy of high-dose (60 Gy) concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with standard-dose (50.4-54 Gy) CCRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing CCRT were eligible for a propensity score matched cohort (1:1 for high dose versus standard dose). Adverse events, local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 380 patients with good balance in observed co-variables were enrolled. OS and LC rates of patients receiving high-dose CCRT were significantly higher than those receiving standard-dose CCRT, with the 10-year OS at 24% versus 13.3%, respectively. In contrast, there was a trend towards increased grades 2-3 acute oesophagitis toxicity among patients receiving high-dose versus standard-dose CCRT (37.4% versus 27.9%, respectively). None experienced grade 5 acute oesophagitis and grade 4 acute toxicities were rare. Similar rates of late radiation oesophagitis, radiation pneumonitis, gastrointestinal reactions and haematological toxicities were observed between patients receiving high-dose versus standard-dose CCRT. Six patients (3.2%) receiving high-dose CCRT experienced >grade 3 leucocytopaenia, and two (1.1%) received standard-dose CCRT, whereas none experienced >grade 3 thrombocytopaenia or anaemia. Three patients (2.3%) receiving high-dose CCRT died of infections caused by myelosuppression. Multivariate analysis showed that anaemia is a significant independent predictor of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard-dose CCRT, high-dose CCRT yielded more favourable local control and survival outcomes for patients with OSCC. Grades 2-3 acute oesophagitis toxicity in patients undergoing high-dose CCRT increased, whereas severe, life-threatening toxicities (>grade 3) did not.

Swainsonine Inhibits Invasion and the EMT Process in Esophageal Carcinoma Cells by Targeting Twist1

Esophageal cancer is a common gastrointestinal cancer, with a very high mortality rate in patients with metastasis. Swainsonine, a cytotoxic fungal alkaloid, has been shown to inhibit cell growth in esophageal cancer. In the present study, we explored the effects of swainsonine on cell invasion and metastasis in esophageal cancer cells. Human esophageal carcinoma cells were treated with different doses of swainsonine, and then cell viability, invasion, and apoptosis were measured. The mRNA and protein expressions of Twist1, apoptosis- and EMT-related factors, and PI3K/AKT pathway factors were detected by qRT-PCR and Western blot. Swainsonine had no effect on esophageal cancer cell viability and apoptosis, but it significantly decreased cell invasion in a dose-dependent manner. Swainsonine increased the expression of E-cadherin but decreased the expression of N-cadherin, vimentin, ZEB1, and snail in a dose-dependent manner, thereby inhibiting EMT. Last, we found that swainsonine inhibits cell invasion and EMT in the esophageal carcinoma cells by downregulation of Twist1 and deactivation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Definitive radiotherapy dose escalation with chemotherapy for treating non-metastatic oesophageal cancer

The locoregional failure rate remains high after concurrent chemoradiotherapy with standard-dose radiotherapy (RT, 50–50.4 Gy) for oesophageal cancer (EC). This retrospective study evaluated whether RT dose escalation was effective among 115 consecutive patients with non-metastatic EC (July 2003 to November 2016). Forty-four patients received an RT dose of <66 Gy and 71 patients received ≥66 Gy, with most patients receiving concurrent cisplatin plus fluorouracil. The median follow-up was 12 months for all patients (52 months for 18 surviving patients). The ≥66 Gy group had significantly higher 3-year rates of overall survival (17.9% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.026) and local progression-free survival (46.1% vs. 72.1%, p = 0.005), but not disease progression-free survival (11.4% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.059) and distant metastasis-free survival (49% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.852). The ≥66 Gy group also had significantly better 5-year overall survival compared with 41.4–65.9 Gy. The only significant difference in treatment-related toxicities involved acute dermatitis (7% vs. 28%, p = 0.009). Inferior overall survival was associated with poor performance status, clinical N2–3 stage and not receiving maintenance chemotherapy. In conclusion, patients with inoperable EC experienced better survival outcomes and acceptable toxicities if they received higher dose RT (≥66 Gy) rather than lower dose RT (<66 Gy).

Trends and disparities in the utilization of hypofractionated neoadjuvant radiation therapy for rectal cancer in the United States

Background

Neoadjuvant conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) versus hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for rectal cancer (RC) is among the most controversial and debatable areas of radiotherapeutic management. This is the only known study evaluating the utilization of neoadjuvant HFRT for RC in the United States, and focuses on trends and health disparities.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base was queried [2004-2015] for newly-diagnosed cT3-T4 N_any or cT_any N1-2 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant RT, with or without chemotherapy, followed by resection. Following analysis based on temporal trends, multivariate logistic regression determined factors associated with receipt of HFRT.

Results

Altogether, 29,994 patients met study criteria: 29,724 (99%) were treated with CFRT, and 270 (1%) with HFRT. Temporally, utilization of HFRT rose significantly, from 0.2% in 2004 to 2.0% in 2015, with the steepest slope at most recent time periods. HFRT was more likely administered to older patients, those with more comorbidities, and node-positive disease (P<0.05 for all). There were racial differences, as African-Americans were independently less likely to receive HFRT (P=0.043). The two strongest predictors of HFRT administration (by odds ratio) were time period and therapy at academic centers (P<0.05 for all).

Conclusions

Although HFRT is underutilized in the US, its use is rising and has increased nearly tenfold over the last decade. Disparities in HFRT delivery are emphasized, especially concerning disease-/patient-specific factors, socioeconomic status, and race. These data may serve as a benchmark for future investigation as well as for health disparities in the radiotherapeutic treatment of RC.

Utilization of intensity modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer in the United States

Background

Chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer (AC) can incur substantial treatment-related toxicities. Whereas radiotherapy (RT) for AC has historically been delivered with two- or three-dimensional conformal RT (2D/3DCRT) techniques, intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) is associated with improved target conformality and lower doses to organs-at-risk (OARs). This is the first investigation to date evaluating trends of IMRT utilization in the United States.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried [2004-2015] for AC patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy with a defined RT technique (3DCRT versus IMRT). Following analysis based on temporal trends, multivariate logistic regression determined factors associated with receipt of IMRT. Secondarily, Kaplan-Meier analysis compared OS between the 3DCRT and IMRT groups, and Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS.

Results

Altogether, 11,396 patients met study criteria; 1,288 (11%) were treated with 3DCRT and 10,108 (89%) with IMRT. Temporally, utilization of IMRT rose significantly, from 28% in 2004 to 96% in 2015, corresponding with a progressive decrease in 3DCRT usage. IMRT was more likely delivered in node-positive disease, at academic centers, and in southern/western regions (P<0.05 for all). T3-4 disease was less likely to receive IMRT (P<0.05). As expected, there were no OS differences based on RT technique (P=0.402). Predictors of worse OS included advancing age, male gender, increasing comorbidities, advanced T-stage, and nodal positivity (P<0.05 for all). In addition to racial- and insurance-related factors, receipt of therapy at academic centers independently predicted for improved OS (P<0.05 for all).

Conclusions

Based on findings from this large, contemporary dataset, IMRT is now the most widely utilized RT technique for AC, and 3DCRT is used in a very small minority of patients. IMRT utilization is impacted by multiple characteristics, such as disease- and regional-related factors. These observations have implications for payers and insurance coverage; improved survival at academic centers has ramifications for patient counseling.

The Role of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer

Background:

The standard of care for locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy. However, the role of adjuvant therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer is unclear.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for patients with LABC, and to determine which risk factors best predict for patients who may best benefit from adjuvant RT.

Methods:

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried (2004– 2013) for patients with newly-diagnosed pT3-4N0-3M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: RT or observation. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving adjuvant RT, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS.

Results:

Altogether, 1,646 patients met inclusion criteria; 59 (3.6%) patients received adjuvant RT, while 1,587 (96.4%) were observed. Patients treated with adjuvant RT were more likely to be female, have positive surgical margins, and receive treatment at a non-academic facility. There was no difference in median overall survival (OS) between patients treated with RT when compared to patients observed (17.7 months vs. 23.5 months; p = 0.085). However, an improvement in median OS with the use of adjuvant RT was observed among patients with positive surgical margins (20.3 months vs. 13.1 months; p = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, advancing age, pT4 stage, positive N stage, positive margins, and lower socioeconomic status were associated with worse OS.

Conclusions:

In the largest study to date evaluating efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer, use of RT was not associated with OS in all patients, while RT was associated with improvemed OS among patients with positive surgical margins. Prospective studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

Increased evidence for the prognostic value of FDG uptake on late-treatment PET in non-tumour-affected oesophagus in irradiated patients with oesophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE

¹⁸F-FDG uptake in irradiated non-tumour-affected oesophagus (NTO) on restaging PET is a potential surrogate for the measurement of radiation-induced inflammation. Radiation-induced inflammation itself has been shown to be of high prognostic relevance in patients undergoing preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. We assessed the prognostic relevance of FDG uptake in the NTO in an independent cohort of patients treated with definitive RCT.

METHODS

This retrospective evaluation included 72 patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive RCT with curative intent. All patients underwent pretreatment and restaging FDG PET after receiving a radiation dose of 40-50 Gy. Standardized uptake values (SUV_max/SUV_mean), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and relative changes from pretreatment to restaging PET (∆SUV_max/∆SUV_mean) were determined within the tumour and NTO. Univariate Cox regression with respect to overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant metastases (DM) and treatment failure (TF) was performed. Independence of parameters was tested by multivariate Cox regression.

RESULTS

∆SUV_max NTO and MTV were prognostic factors for all investigated clinical endpoints (OS, LC, DM, TF). Inclusion of clinical and PET tumour parameters in multivariate analysis showed that ∆SUV_max NTO was an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, multivariate analysis of ∆SUV_max NTO using previously published cut-off values from preoperatively treated patients revealed that ∆SUV_max NTO was independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.88, p = 0.038), TF (HR = 2.11, p = 0.048) and DM (HR = 3.02, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

NTO-related tracer uptake during the course of treatment in patients with oesophageal carcinoma was shown to be of high prognostic relevance. Thus, metabolically activity of NTO measured in terms of ∆SUV_max NTO is a potential candidate for future treatment individualization (i.e. organ preservation).

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer

PURPOSE

The standard of care for locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy. However, the role of adjuvant therapy is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LABC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy, and to determine whether select patients may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried (2004-2013) for patients with newly diagnosed pT3-4N0-3M0 bladder cancer that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: chemotherapy alone or observation. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS) and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS.

RESULTS

Altogether, 2592 patients met inclusion criteria; 901 (34.8%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, while 1691 (65.2%) were observed. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to have positive margins were younger and more likely to receive treatment at a nonacademic facility. There was no difference in median OS between patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (22.6 vs. 21.1 months; p = .267). However, a longer median OS was observed with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was observed among patients with N2-3 disease (17.5 vs. 14.4 months; p = .005) and positive surgical margins (16.7 vs. 12.2 months; p = .025). On multivariate analysis, advancing age, pT4 stage, positive N stage, positive margins and lower socioeconomic status were associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest study to date evaluating efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy, while no difference in OS was observed for adjuvant chemotherapy in all patients, a longer OS was observed among patients with N2-3 disease or with positive surgical margins. Prospective studies are recommended to further evaluate these findings.

Utilization of neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer in the United States

Background

Randomized esophageal cancer (EC) trials have utilized two- or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Advanced radiotherapy (RT) techniques [(ARTs): intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT)] may have benefits, but are relatively unproven. This is the first study to date evaluating utilization of ARTs versus 3DCRT in the trimodality setting in the United States.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried (2004-2013) for newly-diagnosed cT1b-T4bN0/N+M0 EC receiving neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy. The primary objective was to assess temporal trends, with multivariable logistic regression analysis assessing factors predictive of receiving ARTs. Secondarily, Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS, and postoperative complications were compared between cohorts.

Results

Altogether, 3,138 patients met criteria; 1,398 (45%) received 3DCRT, and 1,740 (55%) received ARTs (99% IMRT, 1% PBT). Temporally, utilization of ARTs is steadily rising in the United States, from 20% in 2004 to 69% in 2013, corresponding with a progressive decrease in utilization of 3DCRT. ARTs were more often delivered with advancing age, squamous cell histology, N2+ disease, and at academic centers (P<0.05 for all). Centers in the Southwest were more likely to use ARTs, and those in the Midwest least likely (P<0.05 for both). As expected, there were no OS differences (P=0.8477); there were also no differences in postoperative events (P>0.05 for all). Treatment at an academic center independently correlated with improved OS (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Utilization of ARTs (IMRT in the vast majority) is steadily rising in the United States; 3DCRT is now used in a minority of patients. This has implications for payers and insurance coverage. ART use is impacted by not only age and disease factors, but also regional and facility differences. Treatment at an academic facility independently correlated with higher survival, which has implications for patient counseling.

Utilization of radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for renal cell cancer in the USA

AIM

This study evaluated national practice patterns of cT1N0M0 renal cell cancer, with a focus on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) utilization.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2013) for patients with newly-diagnosed cT1a/bN0M0 renal cell cancer that received definitive treatment. Temporal trends in utilization were tabulated.

RESULTS

Altogether, 138,495 patients met inclusion criteria; 13,725 (9.9%) patients received ablative therapy, 57,924 (41.8%) partial nephrectomy, 67,168 (48.5%) radical nephrectomy and 308 (0.2%) external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The proportion of EBRT that was SBRT increased substantially from 25% in 2004 to 95.4% in 2013, with a sharp inflection point from 2005 to 2006.

CONCLUSION

SBRT utilization has sharply risen over time; in most recent years, the vast majority of EBRT is delivered in the form of SBRT.