A Randomized Trial of Mometasone Furoate 0.1% to Reduce High-Grade Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation

Modified Delphi Consensus on Interventions for Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer: A Canadian Expert Perspective

PURPOSE

Acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) is a prevalent adverse effect of radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer, and there is a lack of high-quality data regarding its prevention and management. This study employs a systematic and iterative process to compile the perspectives of Canadian radiation oncology, nursing, and dermatology experts, aiming to establish consensus-based recommendations for the prevention and management of ARD in breast cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A modified Delphi consensus was conducted with the participation of 19 experts from across Canada. The process involved a systematic review of existing literature on the prevention and treatment of ARD in breast cancer, from January 1946 to September 2023. After review of the literature, participants first provided their opinions on the strength and quality of the evidence for the identified interventions. A second round assessed the degree to which the interventions would be recommended in either low- and/or high-risk settings. Two more rounds consolidated consensus.

RESULTS

After the four rounds, consensus for recommendation was reached for 3 prevention interventions in both low- and high-risk patients: prevention care education, moisturizing, and washing. For high-risk settings, 2 additional prevention interventions reached consensus: Mepitel Film and mometasone furoate. With regards to the management of ARD, there was consensus for recommendation of Mepilex Lite, betamethasone valerate, mometasone furoate, saline soaks/cold compresses and barrier creams.

CONCLUSIONS

This pan-Canadian modified Delphi consensus provides expert-reviewed and evidence-based recommendations for interventions to prevent and manage acute radiation dermatitis in patients with breast cancer. The endorsed interventions offer valuable guidance for clinicians and their patients, highlighting areas where consensus among experts has been achieved.

T-DM1 with concurrent radiotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: preclinical evaluation and mechanisms, prediction, and exploration of adverse effects

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) serves as a pivotal target for breast cancer treatment and a vital prognostic marker. Anti-HER-2 therapies, which are integral to the management of HER-2-positive breast cancer, including monoclonal antibodies (e.g., trastuzumab and pertuzumab), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., lapatinib and pyrotinib), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) such as trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). ADCs consist of a monoclonal antibody, a linker, and a cytotoxic payload, engineered to deliver chemotherapy selectively to tumor cells, thereby reducing the systemic toxicity associated with traditional chemotherapy. T-DM1, a HER-2-targeting ADC, combines the humanized anti-HER-2 IgG1 trastuzumab with DM1, a cytotoxic agent that inhibits microtubule formation. T-DM1 has significantly enhanced the prognosis of HER-2-positive breast cancer patients who fail to achieve a pathological complete response or develop distant metastases after neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab therapy. While the combination therapy of T-DM1 with radiotherapy demonstrates an acceptable safety profile overall, clinicians should remain vigilant regarding potential severe treatment-related toxicities that have been observed in specific clinical scenarios. Nevertheless, limited research exists regarding the adverse effects and mechanisms of T-DM1 in combination with radiotherapy. This review investigates preclinical studies on the interactions between T-DM1 and radiotherapy, investigates associated adverse effects and their underlying mechanisms, identifies predictive factors and prognostic implications, and explores potential therapeutic strategies involving the concurrent T-DM1 with radiotherapy.

A critical review of randomized controlled trials on topical corticosteroids for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Topical steroids have shown effectiveness in preventing radiation dermatitis (RD) in breast cancer patients in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This review provides an in-depth analysis of the study methodology of these RCTs to review whether topical steroids should be employed in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from database inception until May 31, 2024. RCTs comparing topical steroids with moisturizers or placebo for the prophylaxis of RD in breast cancer patients were included. The methodology of the RCTs, including how topical steroids were applied, whether crossover in the control arm was allowed, if stratification factors were employed, and the reporting of side effects was evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs met inclusion criteria. Four different topical steroids were used, including betamethasone 0.1%, mometasone 0.1%, hydrocortisone 1%, and beclomethasone. Eleven studies (92%) showed that topical steroids were effective in reducing incidence or delaying occurrence of grade 2 or above RD with a relative risk of 0.69 (range, 0.19 to 0.98). In all RCTs, topical steroids were consistently used from the start of radiotherapy (RT) until completion to 3 weeks post-RT. Five RCTs (42%) provided patient education on topical steroid application. Six (50%) reported on subsequent management if moist desquamation occurred. Four studies (33%) stratified potential risk factors of RD during randomization. No studies reported any long-term side effects of topical steroids.

CONCLUSION

Topical steroids are effective in reducing the incidence of RD. However, heterogeneity was observed among the RCTs with regard to how and when the topical steroids were applied. The long-term safety profile of topical steroids is not well studied. In the context of modern radiotherapy planning techniques and increased use of hypofractionation radiation schedules, a repeat RCT addressing these methodological concerns may provide more guidance to clinicians.

Individual Sensitivity for Radiotherapy-related Adverse Tissue Reactions in Patients Treated Twice for Metachronous Cancers

The role of genetics in susceptibility to radiotherapy-induced toxicities is unclear. A strong impact of genetics should cause correlated toxicities in patients with metachronous double radiotherapy. We ascertained information about demographics, lifestyle, radiotherapy and early toxicities in irradiated tissues for a retrospective cohort of 98 patients from 2 hospitals who underwent two metachronous radiotherapeutic treatments (2000-2022) of different anatomical regions. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (EORTC/RTOG) toxicity scores per organ system were combined to a single mean score. We considered as genetic component the variation of toxicity not explained by radiation dose to the tumor, age at radiotherapy, sex, smoking status, and surgery. Variance components of toxicity were evaluated by ordinal logistic regression with random intercept. Common site combinations were breast/contralateral breast (N = 16), breast/endometrium (N = 6), and cervix/breast (N = 5). Mean toxicity over exposed tissues was 0.70 (range, 0-3). Prescribed radiation dose was significantly associated with mean toxicity, with a 5% (95% CI 3-8) increase of the odds for a higher toxicity level per Gy. Sex, surgery, age and smoking were not. There was no genetic contribution to risk of toxicities after adjustment. Toxicity levels were not more similar within patients than between patients, suggesting a negligible impact of genotype on radiotherapy-related toxicities.

Therapeutic Potential of Hydrogen as a Radioprotective Agent for the Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis

Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a common side effect in patients receiving radiotherapy. Currently, clinical skincare approaches for acute RD vary widely among institutions and lack consensus. Hydrogen molecules, acting as radioprotective agents by selectively scavenging free radicals, have the potential to protect against RD. In this study, we demonstrate that hydrogen reduces double-strand breaks, mitochondrial depolarization, and inflammatory cytokines induced by irradiation damage in HaCaT cells. Furthermore, in vivo experiments reveal that exposing irradiated skin areas to a hydrogen gas environment alleviates RD. Assessment of skin appearance grade and histology staining revealed that direct transdermal application of hydrogen can prevent radiation-induced follicle damage, dermal thickening, and leukocyte infiltration, thereby reducing the severity of RD. In addition, hydrogen enhances the skin's antioxidant capacity, leading to a reduction in the Bcl-2-associated X protein/B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bax/Bcl-2) ratio, the number of apoptotic cells, and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Our data demonstrate that hydrogen possesses antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic properties, and could be a preventive strategy for RD.

A critical review of the progress in prevention and treatment of radiation-induced skin damage

Radiation therapy was initially used in dermatology to treat various skin diseases, including acne vulgaris, keloids, plantar warts, tinea capitis and hirsutism. Although it is no longer used in the treatment of many of these diseases, radiation therapy still plays a crucial role in the treatment of keloids, skin cancer and solid organ malignancies. In the past 20 years, the widespread use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy has significantly increased in the management of tumor growth in multiple cancer sites and reduced the incidence of complications in normal organs. However, the occurrence and severity of radiation-induced organ complications still significantly affects the quality of life of patients and remains a research hotspot. Skin tissue is the largest area in the human body, serving as both a barrier and a defender. In patients undergoing radiation therapy, skin is often the first tissue that gets damaged. Especially, when the tumor involves the skin or is close to the skin (i.e., skin cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, vulvar cancer), the treatment targets the superficial tissues, and may have inherent adverse effects on the skin. With the increasing incidence of cancer and the widespread use of radiation therapy in cancer treatment, the radiation-induced skin damage has become a serious problem. In this pursuit, the present study provides a review of the progress in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced skin damage, thereby providing a reference for the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced skin damage.

Barrier films or dressings for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Barrier films or dressings were reported to be effective in preventing radiation dermatitis (RD) in breast cancer patients, but their comparative efficacy is unknown.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL Registry of Clinical Trials from inception to October 20, 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing barrier films or dressings to the standard of care (SOC) or other interventions were included. We estimated summary odds ratios and mean differences using network meta-analysis with random effects. This study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023475021).

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs met inclusion criteria. Six interventions were analysed: 3M™ Moisturizing Double Barrier Cream (MDBC), 3M™ No Sting Barrier Film (BF), Hydrofilm® (HF), Mepitel® Film (MF), Silver Leaf Nylon Dressing and StrataXRT®. HF, MF and StrataXRT® reduced the incidence of moist desquamation compared to SOC (HF: OR = 0.08; p = 0.02; MF: OR = 0.31 p < 0.01; StrataXRT®: OR = 0.22, p = 0.04). The ranking of agents from most to least effective in preventing moist desquamation according to P-scores was HF (92.5%), MF (78.5%), StrataXRT® (70.1%), BF (46.4%), Silver Leaf Nylon Dressing (24.9%), MDBC (22.9%) and SOC (14.7%). Only four RCTs on HF and MF included patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments that allowed pooling for analysis. HF and MF were more effective in reducing pain, itchiness and burning sensation compared to SOC (p < 0.01 for all symptoms).

CONCLUSION

HF and MF were effective in preventing RD in breast cancer. Future RCTs should compare these interventions to effective cream preparations, such as topical corticosteroids.

Effectiveness of topical corticosteroids on the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in patients with breast cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of topical corticosteroids (TCS) in preventing acute radiation dermatitis in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

An updated systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in six English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase), three Chinese databases (Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cqvip), and two clinical trial registration platforms (CHICTR, Clinicaltrials.gov) were systematically searched from inception to 1 February 2024.

Results

Thirteen RCTs were included, with 1172 patients in this updated review. Meta-analysis showed that TCS reduced the rate of moist desquamation (OR = 0.31; 95% CI = [0.22, 0.44]; P < 0.01), the incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group ratings of grade 2 or higher (OR = 0.22; 95% CI = [0.14, 0.32]; P < 0.01), the incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ratings of grade 2 or higher (OR = 0.56; 95% CI = [0.37, 0.84]; P < 0.01), the mean score of radiation dermatitis (SMD = -0.46; 95% CI = [-0.59, -0.34]; P < 0.01), skin erythema and hyperpigmentation readings, and improved subjective symptoms.

Conclusions

TCS can effectively prevent acute radiation dermatitis in patients with breast cancer.

Systematic review registration

Prospero (CRD42024507890).

Mometasone furoate inhibits tumor progression and promotes apoptosis through activation of the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway in osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in adolescents. While treatments for osteosarcoma have improved, the overall survival has not changed for three decades, and thus, new targets for therapeutic development are needed. Recently, glucocorticoids have been reported to have antitumor effects. Mometasone furoate (MF), a synthetic glucocorticoid, is of great value in clinical application, but there are few reports on its antitumor effect. Here, we verified the effect of MF on osteosarcoma in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, apoptosis and cell metastasis were detected using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), colony formation, flow cytometry, wound-healing and transwell assays, respectively. In vivo, we generated a xenograft mouse model. To examine the potential role of the AMPK pathway, an AMPK-specific inhibitor (dorsomorphin) was used. The expression levels of factors related to the cell cycle, apoptosis and activation of the AMPK/mTOR pathway were assessed by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. MF inhibited proliferation and metastasis and induced S phase arrest and apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo, MF effectively inhibited osteosarcoma cell growth and pulmonary metastasis; however, it had no negative effect on the internal organs. Additionally, MF could activate the AMPK/mTOR pathway in osteosarcoma. Dorsomorphin significantly attenuated MF-induced antitumor activities. In summary, MF can inhibit osteosarcoma proliferation and metastasis and promote osteosarcoma cell apoptosis through the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo, which can provide a new rationale for subsequent academic and clinical research on osteosarcoma treatment.

Keratin-based topical cream for radiation dermatitis during head and neck radiotherapy: a randomised, open-label pilot study

Introduction

Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a frequent toxicity during radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). We report the first use of KeraStat® Cream (KC), a topical, keratin-based wound dressing, in patients with HNC receiving RT.

Methods

This pilot study randomized HNC patients treated with definitive or postoperative RT (≥60 Gy) to KC or standard of care (SOC), applied at least twice daily during and for 1-month after RT. Outcomes of interest included adherence to the assigned regimen (at least 10 applications per week of treatment), clinician- and patient-reported RD, and skin-related quality of life.

Results

24 patients were randomized and completed the study. Most patients had stage III-IV disease and oropharynx cancer. Median RT dose was 68 Gy; the bilateral neck was treated in 19 patients, and 18 patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Complete adherence was observed in 7/12 (SOC) vs. 10/12 (KC, p = 0.65). Adherence by patient-week was 61/68 versus 64/67, respectively (p = 0.20). No differences in RD were observed between groups.

Conclusion

A randomized trial of KC versus SOC in HNC patients treated with RT is feasible with good adherence to study agent. An adequately powered randomized study is warranted to test the efficacy of KC in reducing RD.

Comparison of the efficacy among different interventions for radiodermatitis: A Bayesian network meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a prevalent and difficult-to-manage consequence of radiation therapy (RT). A variety of interventions have been proven effective in preventing and treating RD. However, the optimal approach remains unclear. This network meta-analysis (NMA) conducted a comparison and ranking of the effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the interventions currently utilized in RD.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on the prevention and treatment of RD. The primary outcome measures included the incidence of grade≥2 RD (i.e., percentage of moist desquamation) and RD score. The secondary outcome measures encompassed patients' subjective assessment scores of pains, itching and burning sensations.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis encompassed 42 studies and 4884 participants. Regarding the primary outcomes, photobiomodulation treatment (PBMT) ranked first in surface under curve cumulative ranking area (SUCRA:0.92) for reducing the incidence of grade≥2 RD. It demonstrated a significant difference when compared to Trolamine (OR 0.18,95%CrI 0.09-0.33) and Xonrid® (OR 0.28,95%CrI 0.12-0.66). Mepitelfilm (SUCRA: 0.98) achieved the highest rank in reducing the RD score, demonstrating superiority over StrataXRT® (MD -0.89, 95% CrI -1.49, -0.29). Henna (SUCRA: 0.89) demonstrated the highest effectiveness in providing pain relief, with a significant difference compared to Hydrofilm (MD -0.44, 95% CrI -0.84, -0.04) and Mepitelfilm (MD -0.55, 95% CrI -0.91, -0.19). Hydrofilm (SUCRA: 0.84) exhibited the fewest itching sensations, demonstrating superiority over Mepitelfilm (MD -0.50, 95% CrI -0.84, -0.17). No statistically significant difference was observed among various interventions in the assessment of burning sensations.

CONCLUSION

PBMT and Mepitelfilm demonstrated better efficacy in reducing the incidence of grade≥2 RD and RD score, respectively. In terms of PROs, Henna and Hydrofilm had fewer complaints in pain and itching sensations, respectively. However, studies with larger sample size on different interventions are warranted in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42023428598.

Pharmaceutical management of acute radiation dermatitis in the German speaking radiation oncology community

BACKGROUND

Radiation dermatitis (RD) remains the most common side effect in radiation therapy (RT) with various pharmaceutical options available for prevention and treatment. We sought to determine pharmaceutical management patterns of radiation dermatitis among radiation oncology professionals.

METHODS

We conducted a survey on RD among the German-speaking community of radiation oncologists inquiring for their opinion on preventive and therapeutic pharmaceutical approaches for acute RD.

RESULTS

244 health professionals participated. Dexpanthenol lotion is the agent most widely used both for prevention (53.0%) and treatment (76.9%) of RD, followed by urea (29.8%) for prevention and corticosteroids (46.9%) for treatment. A wide range of substances is used by participants, though the overall experience with them is rather limited. 32.5% of participants do generally not recommend any preventative treatment. 53.4% of participants recommend alternative medicine for RD management. While seldomly used, corticosteroids were considered most effective in RD therapy, followed by dexpanthenol and low-level laser therapy. A majority of participants prefers moist over dry treatment of moist desquamation and 43.8% prescribe antiseptics.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmaceutical management of RD in the German-speaking radiation oncology community remains controversial, inconsistent, and partially not supported by evidence-based medicine. Stronger evidence level and interdisciplinary consensus is required amongst practitioners to improve these care patterns.

Pharmazeutische Behandlung der akuten Radiodermatitis in der deutschsprachigen strahlentherapeutischen Gemeinschaft: Pharmaceutical management of acute radiation dermatitis in the German speaking radiation oncology community

Hintergrund

Die Radiodermatitis (RD) ist die häufigste Nebenwirkung der Strahlentherapie (RT), wobei verschiedene pharmazeutische Optionen zur Vorbeugung/Behandlung zur Verfügung stehen. Unser Ziel war, die pharmazeutischen Behandlungsmuster für die RD unter strahlentherapeutischen Fachleuten zu ermitteln.

Methodik

Wir haben eine Umfrage zum Thema RD in der deutschsprachigen radioonkologischen Gemeinschaft durchgeführt und ihre Meinung zu präventiven und therapeutischen pharmazeutischen Therapieansätzen betreffend die akute RD erfragt.

Ergebnisse

244 Angehörige zugehöriger Gesundheitsberufe nahmen teil. Dexpanthenol‐Lotion ist das am häufigsten verwendete Mittel sowohl zur Vorbeugung (53%) als auch zur Behandlung (76,9%) der RD, gefolgt von Harnstoff (29,8%) zur Vorbeugung und Kortikosteroiden (46,9%) zur Behandlung. Die Teilnehmer verwenden eine breite Palette an Substanzen, haben aber insgesamt wenig Erfahrung mit diesen. 32,5% der Teilnehmer empfehlen generell keine präventive Behandlung. 53,4% der Teilnehmer empfehlen Alternativmedizin. Obwohl selten eingesetzt, wurden Kortikosteroide als wirksamstes Behandlungsmittel angesehen, gefolgt von Dexpanthenol und Low‐Level‐Lasertherapie. Die Mehrheit der Teilnehmer bevorzugt die feuchte gegenüber der trockenen Behandlung der feuchten Desquamation und 43,8% verschreiben Antiseptika.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die pharmazeutische Behandlung der RD in der deutschsprachigen strahlentherapeutischen Fachwelt ist nach wie vor umstritten, sowie mitunter inkonsistent und nicht durch evidenzbasierte Medizin gestützt. Ein interdisziplinärer Konsens ist erforderlich, um die bestehenden Behandlungskonzepte zu verbessern.

Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Review of Pathology, Diagnosis, and Management

Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity presents a significant global health burden, primarily due to risk factors such as tobacco smoking, smokeless tobacco use, heavy alcohol consumption, and betel quid chewing. Common clinical manifestations of oral cavity cancer include visible lesions and sores, often accompanied by pain in advanced stages. Diagnosis relies on a comprehensive assessment involving detailed history, physical examination, and biopsy. Ancillary imaging studies and functional evaluations aid in accurate staging and facilitate treatment planning. Prognostic information is obtained from histopathological factors, such as tumor grade, depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. Notably, lymph node metastasis, found in approximately half of the patients, carries significant prognostic implications. Effective management necessitates a multidisciplinary approach to optimize patient outcomes. Surgical resection is the backbone of treatment, aimed at complete tumor removal while preserving functional outcomes. Adjuvant therapies, including radiation and chemotherapy, are tailored according to pathological factors. Further work in risk stratification and treatment is necessary to optimize outcomes in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.

A blinded-endpoint, randomized controlled trial of Sanyrene with natural active ingredient for prophylaxis of radiation dermatitis in patients receiving radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Sanyrene® vs. control intervention (DaBao®, a complex of hyaluronic acid and Vitamin E) for acute radiation dermatitis in patients receiving radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with breast cancer or head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy (≥ 50 Gy) were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned to either Sanyrene arm or control intervention arm in a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint was incidence rate of ≥ grade 2 radiation induced dermatitis. (Trial Registration: ChiCTR2100050910, registration date: 9/7/2021) RESULTS: A total of 102 eligible patients were randomly assigned into the study. The rate of ≥ grade 2 radiation dermatitis was 22% in Sanyrene group, as compared with 67.3% in the control intervention group (P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 radiation dermatitis was 20.4% and 8.0% in control intervention group and Sanyrene group, respectively (P = 0.076). Patients in Sanyrene group had a longer median time to reach ≥ grade 2 radiation dermatitis compared to these in control intervention group, with hazard ratio of 0.231 (95%CI:0.116-0.458, p < 0.001). Mean score of SD-16 were much higher in control intervention group than Sanyrene group at end of radiotherapy (25 vs.8.3), 2 weeks after radiotherapy (22.9 vs. 0.5) and 4 weeks after radiotherapy (4.2 vs.0), with significantly statistical difference between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial suggests that Sanyrene is effective on preventing serious radiation dermatitis and improving skin related quality of life in patients with breast cancer or head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy-induced Pathology of the Ear

Acute radiotherapy (RT)-induced external ear soft tissue changes start with erythema and dry desquamation and may progress to moist desquamation and epidermal ulceration. Chronic RT-induced changes include epithelial atrophy and subcutaneous fibrosis. Although RT-induced radiation dermatitis has been well studied, interventions for soft tissue disease involving the external auditory canal (EAC) warrant investigation. Medical management includes topical steroid treatment for EAC radiation dermatitis and topical antibiotic therapy for suppurative otitis externa. Hyperbaric oxygen and pentoxifylline-vitamin E therapy have shown promise for other applications, but their clinical effect on soft tissue EAC disease is currently undefined.

Risk of Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Skin of Color Who Undergo Radiation to the Breast or Chest Wall With and Without Regional Nodal Irradiation

PURPOSE

Acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) is common after radiation therapy for breast cancer, with data indicating that ARD may disproportionately affect Black or African American (AA) patients. We evaluated the effect of skin of color (SOC) on physician-reported ARD in patients treated with radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified patients treated with whole breast or chest wall ± regional nodal irradiation or high tangents using 50 Gy in 25 fractions from 2015 to 2018. Baseline skin pigmentation was assessed using the Fitzpatrick scale (I = light/pale white to VI = black/very dark brown) with SOC defined as Fitzpatrick scale IV to VI. We evaluated associations among SOC, physician-reported ARD, late hyperpigmentation, and use of oral and topical treatments for RD using multivariable models.

RESULTS

A total of 325 patients met eligibility, of which 40% had SOC (n = 129). On multivariable analysis, Black/AA race and chest wall irradiation had a lower odds of physician-reported grade 2 or 3 ARD (odds ratio [OR], 0.110; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.030-0.397; P = .001; OR, 0.377; 95% CI, 0.161-0.883; P = .025), whereas skin bolus (OR, 8.029; 95% CI, 3.655-17.635; P = 0) and planning target volume D0.03cc (OR, 1.001; 95% CI, 1.000-1.001; P = .028) were associated with increased odds. On multivariable analysis, SOC (OR, 3.658; 95% CI, 1.236-10.830; P = .019) and skin bolus (OR, 26.786; 95% CI, 4.235-169.432; P = 0) were associated with increased odds of physician-reported late grade 2 or 3 hyperpigmentation. There was less frequent use of topical steroids to treat ARD and more frequent use of oral analgesics in SOC versus non-SOC patients (43% vs 63%, P < .001; 50% vs 38%, P = .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Black/AA patients exhibited lower odds of physician-reported ARD. However, we found higher odds of late hyperpigmentation in SOC patients, independent of self-reported race. These findings suggest that ARD may be underdiagnosed in SOC when using the physician-rated scale despite this late evidence of radiation-induced skin toxicity.

RISREAC Study: Assessment of Cutaneous Radiation Injury Through Clinical Documentation

OBJECTIVE

Radiation dermatitis (RD) occurs in 95% of patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) for cancer treatment, affecting 800 million patients annually. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of developing a historical RD cohort, Radiation Induced Skin Reactions (RISREAC) cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated RD-related clinical documentation for 245 breast cancer patients who received RT at the University of Rochester Medical Center, to understand the RD progression, scoring, and management. All statistical analyses were performed at 0.05 level of significance.

RESULTS

Clinician-documented RD severity was observed for 169 (69%) patients with a mean severity of 1.57 [1.46, 1.68]. The mean descriptor-based severity score of 2.31 [2.18, 2.45] moderately correlated (r = 0.532, P < 0.0001) with documented RD grade. Most patients (91.8%) received skin care treatment during RT, with 66.7% receiving more than 2 modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The RISREAC cohort is the first retrospective cohort established from clinical documentation of radiation-induced skin changes for the study of RD and cutaneous radiation injury (CRI). RD symptom descriptors were more reliably documented and suitable for all skin types compared to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) or Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades. A new descriptor-based scoring tool would be useful for RD and CRI.

Mepitel Film for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of Mepitel Film in preventing acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) across randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched on 5 March 2023 to identify relevant RCTs. RD assessment tools and outcomes were compared across studies. Pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated based on random-effects analysis using RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

Three RCTs conducted between 2018 and 2020 were included. Mepitel Film decreased RD severity when compared to Sorbolene or Biafine but not when compared to mometasone. A per-protocol analysis of two of the trials revealed that, overall, Mepitel Film significantly reduced the incidence of grade 2-3 RD (odds ratio (OR), 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.65; p = 0.005) and moist desquamation (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10-0.46; p < 0.0001) and decreased average patient, researcher, and combined components of the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (the standardized mean difference (SMD) for patient ratings, - 2.56; 95% CI, - 3.15 to - 1.96, p < 0.00001; SMD for researcher ratings, - 3.47; 95% CI, - 6.63 to - 0.31, p = 0.03; SMD for combined scores, - 3.68; 95% CI, - 6.43 to - 0.92, p = 0.009). Noted issues with Mepitel Film included itchiness and poor adherence.

CONCLUSION

While there were discrepancies across studies, Mepitel Film demonstrated a decrease in the incidence of grade 2-3 RD and moist desquamation. These findings emphasize the need for further examining Mepitel Film's efficacy across diverse patient groups and the importance of standardizing RD severity assessment methodologies and control arms.

Bacterial Decolonization for Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Evidence-based approaches for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) are limited, and additional strategies are necessary to optimize care.

Objective

To determine the efficacy of bacterial decolonization (BD) to reduce ARD severity compared with standard of care.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2/3 randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2019 to August 2021 with investigator blinding at an urban academic cancer center and enrolled patients with breast cancer or head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy (RT) with curative intent. Analysis was performed on January 7, 2022.

Interventions

Intranasal mupirocin ointment twice daily and chlorhexidine body cleanser once daily for 5 days prior to RT and repeated for 5 days every 2 weeks through RT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome as planned prior to data collection was the development of grade 2 or higher ARD. Based on wide clinical variability of grade 2 ARD, this was refined to grade 2 ARD with moist desquamation (grade 2-MD).

Results

Of 123 patients assessed for eligibility via convenience sampling, 3 were excluded, and 40 refused to participate, with 80 patients in our final volunteer sample. Of 77 patients with cancer (75 patients with breast cancer [97.4%] and 2 patients with head and neck cancer [2.6%]) who completed RT, 39 were randomly assigned BC, and 38 were randomly assigned standard of care; the mean (SD) age of the patients was 59.9 (11.9) years, and 75 (97.4%) were female. Most patients were Black (33.7% [n = 26]) or Hispanic (32.5% [n = 25]). Among patients with breast cancer and patients with head and neck cancer (N = 77), none of the 39 patients treated with BD and 9 of the 38 patients (23.7%) treated with standard of care developed ARD grade 2-MD or higher (P = .001). Similar results were observed among the 75 patients with breast cancer (ie, none treated with BD and 8 [21.6%] receiving standard of care developed ARD grade ≥2-MD; P = .002). The mean (SD) ARD grade was significantly lower for patients treated with BD (1.2 [0.7]) compared with patients receiving standard of care (1.6 [0.8]) (P = .02). Of the 39 patients randomly assigned to BD, 27 (69.2%) reported regimen adherence, and only 1 patient (2.5%) experienced an adverse event related to BD (ie, itch).

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that BD is effective for ARD prophylaxis, specifically for patients with breast cancer.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03883828.

Topical corticosteroids for the prevention of severe radiation dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a frequently occurring adverse reaction during radiotherapy in cancer patients. While the use of topical corticosteroids (TCs) is common for the treatment of RD, its role in preventing severe reactions remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the evidence on the use of TCs as prophylaxis of RD.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using OVID MedLine, Embase, and Cochrane databases (between 1946 and 2023) to identify studies examining TC use in the prevention of severe RD. Statistical analysis was completed using RevMan 5.4 to calculate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Forest plots were then developed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs with a total of 1041 patients met the inclusion criteria. Six studies reported on mometasone furoate (MF) and four studies reported on betamethasone. Both TCs were associated with a significant improvement in the prevention of moist desquamation [OR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.25, 0.47], p < 0.00001], but betamethasone was found to be more effective than MF [OR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.18, 0.46], p < 0.00001 and OR = 0.39, 95% CI [0.25, 0.61], p < 0.0001, respectively]. A similar finding was seen in reducing the development of grade 2 or higher RD according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence supports the use of TCs in preventing severe reactions of RD. Both MF and betamethasone were found to be effective; however, betamethasone, a higher potency TC, is more effective despite MF being more commonly reported in literature.

MASCC clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of acute radiation dermatitis: part 1) systematic review

Acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) commonly develops in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and is often characterized by erythema, desquamation, and pain. A systematic review was conducted to summarize the current evidence on interventions for the prevention and management of ARD. Databases were searched from 1946 to September 2020 to identify all original studies that evaluated an intervention for the prevention or management of ARD, with an updated search conducted in January 2023. A total of 235 original studies were included in this review, including 149 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Most interventions could not be recommended due to a low quality of evidence, lack of supporting evidence, or conflicting findings across multiple trials. Photobiomodulation therapy, Mepitel® film, mometasone furoate, betamethasone, olive oil, and oral enzyme mixtures showed promising results across multiple RCTs. Recommendations could not be made solely based on the published evidence due to limited high-quality evidence. As such, Delphi consensus recommendations will be reported in a separate publication.

Diagnosis and management of basal cell carcinoma: interdisciplinary consensus statements of Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, a Department of Health Tertiary Hospital in Manila, Philippines

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cutaneous malignancy. Multiple risk factors are associated in the development of BCC, with ultraviolet light and genetics playing major roles.

AIMS

The departments of dermatology, medical oncology, ophthalmology, otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery, plastic surgery, and radiation oncology of the Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, Manila, Philippines, have convened and formulated consensus statements on the diagnosis and management of BCC patients seen in the institution.

CONCLUSION

The summary of the recommendations is: (1) Surgery is the treatment of choice for BCC. The range of margins (2-4 mm) depends on the type of BCC. (2) Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is indicated for high risk BCC. (3) Topical treatment with imiquimod or 5-flourouracil (5-FU) may be used for superficial BCC. (4) Destructive methods (cryotherapy, curettage and electrodessication, photodynamic therapy) may be used for low risk BCC. (5) Medical and/or radiation therapy is advised for cases where surgery is contraindicated or tumor is not amenable to surgery. Metastasis of this malignancy is rare. Follow-up, which may continue up until 2 years, is recommended for high risk BCC.

Smoking and Radiation-induced Skin Injury: Analysis of a Multiracial, Multiethnic Prospective Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Smoking during breast radiotherapy (RT) may be associated with radiation-induced skin injury (RISI). We aimed to determine if a urinary biomarker of tobacco smoke exposure is associated with increased rates of RISI during and after breast RT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with Stage 0-IIIA breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy followed by RT to the breast or chest wall with or without regional nodal irradiation were prospectively enrolled on a multicenter study assessing acute/late RISI. 980 patients with urinary cotinine (UCot) measurements (baseline and end-RT) were categorized into three groups. Acute and late RISI was assessed using the ONS Acute Skin Reaction scale and the LENT-SOMA Criteria.

RESULTS

Late Grade 2+ and Grade 3+ RISI occurred in 18.2% and 1.9% of patients, respectively-primarily fibrosis, pain, edema, and hyperpigmentation. Grade 2+ late RISI was associated with UCot group (P= 006). Multivariable analysis identified UCot-based light smoker/secondhand smoke exposure (HR 1.79, P= .10) and smoking (HR 1.60, p = .06) as non-significantly associated with an increased risk of late RISI. Hypofractionated breast RT was associated with decreased risk of late RISI (HR 0.51, P=.03). UCot was not associated with acute RISI, multivariable analysis identified race, obesity, RT site/fractionation, and bra size to be associated with acute RISI.

CONCLUSIONS

Tobacco exposure during breast RT may be associated with an increased risk of late RISI without an effect on acute toxicity. Smoking cessation should be encouraged prior to radiotherapy to minimize these and other ill effects of smoking.

Efficacy of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate in Preventing Dermatitis in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Postoperative Radiotherapy: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Safe and effective prophylactic therapies for radiation-induced dermatitis (RID) remain an unmet need.

Objective

To determine if epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) solution reduces the incidence of RID in patients undergoing radiotherapy after breast cancer surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial enrolled 180 patients with breast cancer receiving postoperative radiotherapy at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute in Shandong, China, between November 2014 and June 2019. Data analysis was performed from September 2019 to January 2020.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either EGCG solution (660 μmol/L) or placebo (0.9% NaCl saline) sprayed to the whole radiation field from day 1 of the radiation until 2 weeks after radiation completion.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was incidence of grade 2 or worse RID, defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale. The secondary end points included RID index (RIDI), symptom index, changes in the skin temperature measured by infrared thermal images, and safety.

Results

A total of 180 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 165 (EGCG, n = 111; placebo, n = 54) were evaluable for efficacy (median [range] age, 46 [26-67] years). The occurrence of grade 2 or worse RID was significantly lower (50.5%; 95% CI, 41.2%-59.8%) in the EGCG group than in the placebo group (72.2%; 95% CI, 60.3%-84.1%) (P = .008). The mean RIDI in the EGCG group was significantly lower than that in the placebo group. Furthermore, symptom indexes were significantly lower in patients receiving EGCG. Four patients (3.6%) had adverse events related to the EGCG treatment, including grade 1 pricking skin sensation (3 [2.7%]) and pruritus (1 [0.9%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, prophylactic use of EGCG solution significantly reduced the incidence and severity of RID in patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. It has the potential to become a new choice of skin care for patients receiving radiotherapy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02580279.

Treatment Effect of Mometasone Furoate Cream on Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus of External Genitalia in Boys and Its Correlation with Toll-Like Receptor 4 and Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88

Objective

The objective is to explore the treatment effect of mometasone furoate cream on lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LSeA) of external genitalia in boys and its correlation with Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88).

Methods

A total of 100 boys treated in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 due to clinical manifestations in the external genitalia were selected as the study objects. All boys received redundant circumcision treatment, their protein expression of TLR4 and MyD88 in foreskin tissues was measured by BCA protein assay and western blot, and mometasone furoate cream was applied to those who were pathologically diagnosed with LSeA, so as to compare the levels of serum inflammatory factors and urodynamic indicators in the child patients before and after treatment.

Results

The total clinical efficacy rate of LSeA child patients was up to 90.79%; after treatment, the maximum and mean urinary flow rates of child patients were significantly higher than before treatment (P < 0.001); compared with the non-LSeA group, the protein expression of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB was increased in the LSeA group (P < 0.001), and the mRNA expression of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB was significantly increased in the LSeA group (P < 0.001); the results of ROC curves showed that TLR4 had the highest AUC value, and during treatment, the incidence rate of adverse reactions in child patients was 6.58%.

Conclusion

LSeA will increase the inflammatory reactions in child patients, and its pathogenesis may be related to the upregulation of TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB expression and thus activation of TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathways. Applying mometasone furoate cream to LSeA patients after redundant circumcision can effectively reduce the inflammatory reactions in the body and improve their urodynamic indicators, with exact efficacy. Further research will be conducive to establishing a better treatment scheme for such child patients.

Radiation induced skin reactions during and following radiotherapy: A systematic review of interventions

INTRODUCTION

Radiation induced skin reactions (RISR) are a common adverse effect of radiotherapy that can impact on patient quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to identify new research evidence on interventions for RISR to guide health practitioners on best practice skin care for people receiving radiotherapy.

METHODS

A narrative systematic review was adopted including published research since 2014. The MESH search terms used in the 2014 College of Radiographers skin care systematic review were supplemented with terms identified through a pearl growing search technique.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were identified and reviewed, 13(39.4%) were assessed as having a high risk of bias 6(18.2%) moderate risk of bias, and 13(39.4%) low risk of bias; one pilot study was not assessed. Twenty-one of the studies were randomised controlled trials, 2 feasibility studies, 9 non-randomised trials, and 1 a pilot study.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from well conducted studies identified prophylactic use of steroid cream for patients, at high risk of RISR, as being the most efficacious in reducing acute skin reactions. Further research is needed on photo biomodulation therapy, studied within standard dose fractionation schedules, before it is recommended for use in practice. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of barrier films or any topical emollients currently in practice to reduce RISRs. Despite the number of new studies in this area there is limited good comparative research of RISR that accounts for predictive risk and new radiotherapy techniques.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Practitioners are encouraged to risk assess patients prior to radiotherapy to guide interventions and record and monitor patient skin toxicity regularly during treatment, comparing toxicity changes with scores recorded at baseline and support patient self-monitoring of skin reactions.

Morbidity in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Radiation-Induced Skin Lesions: Cause, Risk Factors, and Dermatitis Evolution and Severity

OBJECTIVE

Radiation-induced skin injuries such as lesions (RSLs) and dermatitis are the most common complication during radiotherapy (RT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but little is known about risk factors unique to oncology. This study sought a greater understanding of these risk factors to stratify patients based on risk and guide clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Investigators analyzed the data of 864 consecutive patients referred to the RT center of the Southern Theater General Hospital for a new RSL from 2013 to 2019. These patients were followed up for an average of approximately 16 months until their death or March 30, 2020, whichever came first. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify predictors of grade 3 or 4 dermatitis.

RESULTS

The main causes of treatment interruption included dermatitis and oral mucositis. Significant patient-specific risk factors for RSLs included current smoking, current drinking, and lower Karnofsky Performance Scale score and significant procedure-specific risk factors included receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), hyperfractionated RT, induction chemotherapy, multicycle chemotherapy, and taxol- and cisplatin-based drugs. The three factors that independently predicted risk of RSL were IMRT, lower Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and multicycle chemotherapy. Comparing predictive factors among patients with severe RSL revealed that patients who received IMRT were more likely to develop grade 3 or 4 dermatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncology providers should note that IMRT is an aggressive technique with a trend toward increased RSL. Providers should pay special attention to adverse effects to skin in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Effect of Heparinoid Moisturizer on Quality of Life in Patients with Acute Radiation Skin Damage Following Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

Background

With few research reports on the effects of moisturizer use for dry skin associated with radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on patient quality of life (QOL), we conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate this effect.

Methods

Patients with breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either heparinoid moisturizer (Group M) or no treatment (Group C). Group M was instructed to apply heparinoid moisturizer during 3 weeks of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation with or without boost until 4 weeks after completion of irradiation. Skin-related QOL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for 7 weeks. The primary endpoint was total DLQI score at 4 weeks after the start date.

Results

In total, 35 patients in Group M and 37 patients in Group C were analyzed. The DLQI total score (2.06 ± 2.17: mean ± SD) at 4 weeks in Group M was slightly lower than in Group C (2.16 ± 2.13) but with no significant difference (p = 0.894). The “Symptoms and feelings” subscore indicated significant worsening at 3 weeks and maintained until 7 weeks in Group C. There was no significant change for this subscore during radiotherapy in Group M, and it significantly increased after radiotherapy (4–5 weeks) and returned to baseline in 7 weeks. The period of subscore worsening was shorter in Group M than in Group C.

Conclusion

Concomitant and extended use of heparinoid moisturizer with radiation therapy may improve the QOL of breast cancer patients impaired by dry skin for patients with breast cancer.

Radiation therapy-associated toxicity: Etiology, management, and prevention

Radiation therapy (RT) is a curative treatment for many malignancies and provides effective palliation in patients with tumor-related symptoms. However, the biophysical effects of RT are not specific to tumor cells and may produce toxicity due to exposure of surrounding organs and tissues. In this article, the authors review the clinical context, pathophysiology, risk factors, presentation, and management of RT side effects in each human organ system. Ionizing radiation works by producing DNA damage leading to tumor death, but effects on normal tissue may result in acute and/or late toxicity. The manifestation of toxicity depends on both cellular characteristics and affected organs' anatomy and physiology. There is usually a direct relationship between the radiation dose and volume to normal tissues and the risk of toxicity, which has led to guidelines and recommended dose limits for most tissues. Side effects are multifactorial, with contributions from baseline patient characteristics and other oncologic treatments. Technological advances in recent decades have decreased RT toxicity by dramatically improving the ability to deliver RT that maximizes tumor dose and minimizes organ dose. Thus the study of RT-associated toxicity is a complex, core component of radiation oncology training that continues to evolve alongside advances in cancer management. Because RT is used in up to one-half of all patients with cancer, an understanding of its acute and late effects in different organ systems is clinically pertinent to both oncologists and nononcologists.

Predictors of Acute Radiation Dermatitis and Esophagitis in African American Patients Receiving Whole Breast Radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy following breast conserving surgery is standard of care in the management of early stage breast cancer. Two of the most common acute toxicities of breast radiotherapy are radiation esophagitis (RE) and radiation dermatitis (RD). African Americans are at higher risk for experiencing treatment-related toxicity and are often under-represented in clinical trials.

METHODS

An institutional database was developed to include all African American patients with history of breast cancer or DCIS undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy at a single institution from 2013-2019. Records were reviewed to identify patient age, BMI, radiation dose, prone vs supine position, inclusion of boost, and inclusion of regional nodal irradiation (RNI). Radiation treatment plans were reviewed to identify breast size as well as dosimetric parameters to the breast and esophagus. Medical records were reviewed to identify which patients were prescribed silvadene or mylanta-lidocaine during or immediately following their course of radiotherapy which was used as a surrogate for Grade 2 or higher dermatitis (G2RD) and esophagitis (G2RE), respectively.

RESULTS

272 patients were included in the final analysis. On univariable analysis, morbidly obese patients were more likely to develop G2RD while hypofractionated radiotherapy was associated with lower rates of G2RD. On multivariable analysis, increasing breast volume was associated with higher rates of G2RD. For the subset of patients receiving RNI, 19% of patients experienced G2RE with the best predictor on multivariable analysis being D_mean to the esophagus.

CONCLUSION

Radiation dermatitis and esophagitis are common toxicities in African American patients undergoing adjuvant breast radiotherapy. Breast size, irrespective of patient's BMI, was associated with worse rate of dermatitis. Prone position and hypofractionated radiation reduced rates of G2RD. D_mean to the esophagus was the dosimetric parameter best correlating with G2RE. These results may be used to help select patients are at higher risk for G2 or higher toxicity during radiotherapy.

Opium poisoning following self-medication of radiation-induced dermatitis with topical use of opium latex traditional extract; a teaching case

Despite Radiation-induced dermatitis is a self-limiting complication, it can be complicated if inappropriate self-medications have been used such as opium latex traditional extract.

Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Topical Steroid Versus Placebo for Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Chemoradiation

PURPOSE

Radiation dermatitis is one of the most common acute toxicities induced by chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). The benefit of topical steroids in the management of radiation dermatitis is still unclear. This phase 3, multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of topical steroids for radiation dermatitis in patients with locally advanced HNC receiving CRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients were scheduled to receive bilateral neck irradiation (≥66 Gy) with concurrent cisplatin (≥200 mg/m²) as definitive or postoperative CRT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either topical steroid or placebo when grade 1radiation dermatitis was observed or the total radiation dose reached 30 Gy. Basic skin care including gentle washing and moistening in the head and neck region was performed in both groups. The primary endpoint was the frequency of grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis, in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Grading of radiation dermatitis was performed by independent central review using photographs taken weekly.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients were enrolled (intention to treat: steroid 101 and placebo 102). The frequency of grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis was not significantly reduced with the steroid (73.3%; 95% confidence interval, 64.6%-81.9%) compared with the placebo (80.4%; 95% confidence interval, 72.7%-88.1%; P = .23), whereas the steroid significantly reduced the frequency of grade ≥3 radiation dermatitis (13.9% vs 25.5%; P = .034). No significant differences in adverse events, including local infection or compliance with CRT, were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical steroid may reduce the severity of radiation dermatitis in patients with HNC and thus may become an important therapeutic tool in the management of radiation dermatitis.

Supportive care for toxicities in children undergoing radiation therapy

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of the management of many pediatric tumors; however, it is associated with both acute and permanent adverse events that can significantly impact a child's quality of life, lead to treatment delays, and potentially affect outcomes of cancer therapy. Prevention, early detection, and optimal management of these adverse effects will help reduce their impact on the patients' quality of life and overall well-being. Unfortunately, there has not been a coordinated effort to study the etiology, evaluate risk factors, and explore novel treatments for these conditions. Studies of supportive care for children undergoing RT are often small and uncontrolled. This review will focus on the impact of irradiation on the different organ systems and their current management. Further studies are required to improve our understanding of the contributing factors and explore novel treatment options for these adverse effects and to enable children and their families to better cope with some of the unavoidable toxicities following multimodality therapy.

Radiation-induced acute injury of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective cohort study

To address whether the addition of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) aggravate radiation-induced acute injury of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) patients with induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We conducted a prospective study of 182 patients in the stage III to IVb with biopsy-proven nonmetastatic LANPC who newly underwent radiotherapy and sequentially received IC, followed by CCRT at our institution. Occurring time of radiation-induced toxicities were estimated and compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and Log-rank test. The most severe acute toxicities included oral mucositis in 97.25% and dermatitis in 90.11%. Subset analysis revealed that Grade 3–4 acute dermatitis were significantly higher in the IMRT than 3D-CRT. Oral mucositis and dermatitis were the earliest occurrence of acute injuries (2 years: 60.44% and 17.58%). Patients in IMRT group achieved significantly lower risk of bone marrow toxicity, but higher risk of leukopenia and gastrointestinal injury. Multivariate analyses also demonstrated that IMRT, female gender and hepatitis were the independent prognostic factors for bone marrow toxicity. In a combined regimen of IC followed by CCRT for the treatment of LANPC, IMRT seems to be an aggressive technique with a trend towards increased gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities, but decreased bone marrow toxicity than those treated with 3D-CRT. This study provides a comprehensive summary of prospective evidence reporting the side effects in the management of LANPC patients. We quantify the occurrence risks of chemoradiotherapy-induced acute injuries through analysis of time-to-event.

Patient and radiographer acceptability of prophylactic skin care for breast patients receiving radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to: • Address the lack of information surrounding patient preference within radiotherapy skin care. • Identify if prophylactic skin care is the preferred approach of patients and staff. • Establish if patients and staff are accepting of the use of a type of barrier film, such as 3M™ Cavilon™ No Sting Barrier Film.

METHODS

Twelve patients undergoing standard whole breast radiotherapy and four staff members who were based mainly on a breast-specific treatment unit were interviewed using semi-structured techniques. The interview transcripts were coded for areas of interest and a thematic map generated using the qualitative data analysis software (NVivo V12, QSR International).

RESULTS

One Hundred percent of patients (n = 12) would have preferred a proactive approach to skin care management over the reactive one currently implemented. Staff were also in favour of a proactive approach to skin care with 100% (n = 4) supportive of a trial into the film's effectiveness. Three key themes were identified: • Theme 1: Patient Ownership of Own care - all patients identified they preferred a prophylactic approach and that more specific skin care guidance from healthcare professionals would be beneficial. • Theme 2: Product Practicality - 93% of patients and 100% of staff accepted the product and would be open to the use of it clinically. • Theme 3: Staff Acknowledgement of Skin Care - all staff identified a patient group in need of prophylaxis and that Cavilon No Sting may be a product of interest.

CONCLUSION

Patients and staff were in support of prophylactic skin care, both approved of the proposed product. However, there is a significant lack of clinical evidence to support the use of any topical products within radiotherapy skincare due to the lack of high-quality studies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Changes to skin care practice could be considered due to patient preference in favour of proactive management.

A prospective feasibility study of a 1-mm bolus for postmastectomy radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The optimal chest wall bolus regimen for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) remains unknown. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the use of a 1-mm-thick daily tissue-equivalent bolus in patients who received PMRT using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and skin toxicity assessment.

METHODS

Patients with a 1-mm-thick daily bolus during PMRT were prospectively enrolled at The Juntendo University Hospital. The surface dose was measured in vivo under the 1-mm-thick bolus on the chest wall. We assessed the acute skin toxicity weekly during PMRT, and 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks after the completion of PMRT.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients aged 32-79 years old received PMRT from July 2019 to January 2020. All patients completed the protocol treatment without interruptions, and the median follow-up was 32 weeks. In vivo dosimetry analysis revealed surface doses between 77 and 113% of the prescribed dose, with a mean of 92% of the prescribed radiation dose, and a standard deviation of 7% being delivered. Grade 2 dermatitis was found in 10 patients (53%), and Grade 3 dermatitis was found in one patient (5%). All cases of Grade 2 and 3 dermatitis were improved 4 weeks after PMRT. There were no cases of Grade 4 dermatitis and no chest wall recurrences during the treatment or follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Results confirmed the feasibility of using a 1-mm-thick daily bolus for PMRT, exhibiting an appropriate dose buildup and acceptable skin toxicity without treatment interruptions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000035773 . Registered 1 July 2019.

Radiation-induced skin injury: pathogenesis, treatment, and management

Radiation-induced skin injury (RSI) refers to a frequently occurring complication of radiation therapy. Nearly 90% of patients having received radiation therapy underwent moderate-to-severe skin reactions, severely reducing patients' quality of life and adversely affecting their disease treatment. No gold standard has been formulated for RSIs. In the present study, the mechanism of RSI and topical medications was discussed. Besides, this study can be referenced for clinicians to treat RSIs to guide subsequent clinical medicine.

ONS Guidelines™ for Cancer Treatment-Related Radiodermatitis

PURPOSE

Radiodermatitis is a side effect of radiation therapy. Evidence-based interventions to minimize severity or delay progression are important for clinical care. This guideline intends to support individuals with cancer, clinicians, and others in decisions regarding radiodermatitis treatment.

METHODOLOGIC APPROACH

A panel of healthcare professionals with patient representation was convened to develop a national clinical practice guideline for the management of radiodermatitis. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine criteria for trustworthy guidelines were followed. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool was used, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. A quantitative and narrative synthesis of the evidence was completed.

FINDINGS

The panel agreed on eight recommendations and made a conditional recommendation for deodorant/antiperspirant. Aloe vera and oral curcumin had knowledge gaps and were recommended only in the context of a clinical trial. The panel suggested against emu oil, calendula, and nonsteroidal interventions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

This guideline summarizes evidence-based interventions for the management of radiodermatitis to guide clinical care.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL CAN BE FOUND AT&NBSP;HTTPS

//bit.ly/2GEwJtT.

Dermatologic toxicities associated with radiation therapy in women with breast cancer

Breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy has become the standard of care for women with early stage breast cancer, and as a result, a large number of patients are affected by the cutaneous sequelae of radiation therapy. These dermatologic toxicities may present during treatment or years later and can significantly impact patients’ quality of life. In this review, we discuss the clinical presentation, prevention, and management of radiation-induced cutaneous toxicities in women with breast cancer, including radiation dermatitis, radiation recall, radiation-induced morphea, radiation-induced fibrosis, and cutaneous malignancies in irradiated skin.

Cutaneous Radiation Injuries: Models, Assessment and Treatments

Many cases of human exposures to high-dose radiation have been documented, including individuals exposed during the detonation of atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, nuclear power plant disasters (e.g., Chernobyl), as well as industrial and medical accidents. For many of these exposures, injuries to the skin have been present and have played a significant role in the progression of the injuries and survivability from the radiation exposure. There are also instances of radiation-induced skin complications in routine clinical radiotherapy and radiation diagnostic imaging procedures. In response to the threat of a radiological or nuclear mass casualty incident, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services tasked the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) with identifying and funding early- to mid-stage medical countermeasure (MCM) development to treat radiation-induced injuries, including those to the skin. To appropriately assess the severity of radiation-induced skin injuries and determine efficacy of different approaches to mitigate/treat them, it is necessary to develop animal models that appropriately simulate what is seen in humans who have been exposed. In addition, it is important to understand the techniques that are used in other clinical indications (e.g., thermal burns, diabetic ulcers, etc.) to accurately assess the extent of skin injury and progression of healing. For these reasons, the NIAID partnered with two other U.S. Government funding and regulatory agencies, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to identify state-of-the-art methods in assessment of skin injuries, explore animal models to better understand radiation-induced cutaneous damage and investigate treatment approaches. A two-day workshop was convened in May 2019 highlighting talks from 28 subject matter experts across five scientific sessions. This report provides an overview of information that was presented and the subsequent guided discussions.

A monocentric, open-label randomized standard-of-care controlled study of XONRID®, a medical device for the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced dermatitis in breast and head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND

This study was an open-label, 2-arms, monocentric, randomized clinical trial comparing Xonrid®, a topical medical device, versus standard of care (SOC) in preventing and treating acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) and Breast Cancer (BC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Eligible HNC and BC patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Xonrid® + SOC or SOC during RT. Patients were instructed to apply Xonrid® on the irradiated area three times daily, starting on the first day of RT and until 2 weeks after RT completion or until the development of grade ≥ 3 skin toxicity. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the proportion of patients who developed an ARD grade < 2 at the 5th week in both groups. Secondary endpoints were median time to grade 2 (G2) skin toxicity onset; changes in skin erythema and pigmentation and trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL); patient-reported skin symptoms. All patients were evaluated at baseline, weekly during RT and 2 weeks after treatment completion. The evaluation included: clinical toxicity assessment; reflectance spectrometry (RS) and TEWL examination; measurement of patients' quality of life (QoL) through Skindex-16 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (40 for each cancer site) were enrolled between June 2017 and July 2018. Groups were well balanced for population characteristics. All BC patients underwent 3-Dimensional Conformal RT (3D-CRT) whereas HNC patients underwent Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). At week 5 the proportion of BC patients who did not exhibit G2 ARD was higher in Xonrid® + SOC group (p = 0.091). In the same group the onset time of G2 ARD was significantly longer than in SOC-alone group (p < 0.0491). For HNC groups there was a similar trend, but it did not reach statistical significance. For both cancer sites, patients' QoL, measured by the Skindex-16 score, was always lower in the Xonrid® + SOC group.

CONCLUSION

Despite the failure to achieve the primary endpoint, this study suggests that Xonrid® may represent a valid medical device in the prevention and treatment of ARD at least in BC patients, delaying time to develop skin toxicity and reducing the proportion of patients who experienced G2 ARD during RT treatment and 2 weeks later.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano (INT 52/14 - NCT02261181 ). Registered on ClinicalTrial.gov on 21st August 2017.

Dermatologic Sequelae Associated with Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy is a mainstay for the treatment of primary malignancies and metastatic disease and is associated with several dermatological adverse events that are underreported in the literature. The objective of this paper was to review the literature regarding cutaneous manifestations associated with radiation therapy in order to promote awareness of the cutaneous radiation therapy-associated adverse effects. This extensive literature review was performed using the Pubmed and Embase databases. Studies were reviewed for relevance and critical evidence pertaining to cutaneous manifestations of radiation therapy. The most commonly reported cutaneous sequelae associated with radiation therapy include radiation dermatitis, non-melanoma skin cancer, radiation-associated angiosarcoma, morphea, bullous pemphigoid, lymphangioma circumscriptum, and pseudosclerodermatous panniculitis. For many of these conditions, only case reports or case series exist and there is an absence of large-scale cohort studies. Despite these limitations, this review describes the wide range of dermatological adverse events associated with radiation therapy.

Radiation dermatitis in patients treated with concurrent trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)

Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) improves outcomes for patients with HER2+ breast cancer, and is given concurrently with radiation. We have noted increased radiation dermatitis in these patients, which may have been underreported on the KATHERINE clinical trial, and call for clinicians to remain vigilant of unexpected toxicities with newly approved therapies.

Topical treatment of radiation-induced dermatitis: current issues and potential solutions

Approximately 95% of patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) will ultimately develop radiation-induced dermatitis (RID) during or after the course of treatment, with major consequences on quality of life and treatment outcomes. This paper reviews the pathophysiology of RID and currently used topical products for the prevention and treatment of RID. Although there is no consensus on the appropriate management, recent evidence suggests that the use of topical products supports to protect and promote tissue repair in patients with RID. Basic recommendations include advice to wear loose clothing, using electric razors if necessary, and avoiding cosmetic products, sun exposure or extreme temperatures. Based on mechanisms involved and on the clinical characteristics of oncological patients, the profile of the ideal topical product for addressing RID can be designed; it should have limited risk of adverse events, systemic adsorption and drug–drug interactions, should be characterized by multiple clinical activities, with a special focus on localized pain, and should have a careful formulation as some vehicles can block the RT beam.

Relationships between the changes of skin temperature and radiation skin injury

Background: Radiation skin injury (RSI) causes changes in skin temperature, but detailed information on the thermographic responses is currently lacking. We investigated thermographic patterns after radiotherapy. We hypothesized that skin temperature may be used as a diagnostic and early predictor of RSI severity.Method: All breast cancer patients received radiotherapy after unilateral postmastectomy. The contralateral supraclavicular area served as control, and the frontal thermal image of torso was taken by a thermal infrared imager weekly. We defined areas of interest on bilateral symmetrical supraclavicular area, and analyzed the difference of average and maximum skin temperature (DST_average and DST_max) between them. The extent of the weekly variation in DST (DSTW) was calculated using a mathematical formula to represent a trend of skin temperature change. RSI and symptoms related to RSI were scored from baseline to 2 weeks after the end of radiotherapy.Results: Forty-one patients were enrolled in this study. In comparison to the baseline, the DST_average and DST_max increased significantly over time during radiotherapy (p < .05). The onset of DST increase was accompanied by the onset of radiation dermatitis, and the maximal DST also appeared at the peak of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and symptom scores. Radiation dose, DST_average, burning-feeling and pulling were the independent variables affecting RTOG score according to multivariate analysis (p < .001, p < .034, p < .001, p < .001). Patients with DSTW_average >1.223 or DSTW_max >1.114 in second week showed a late higher dermatitis score (RTOG score ≥2).Conclusion: This study confirmed that RSI was associated with thermographic response. Our results suggested that the follow-up observations of skin temperature during radiotherapy could provide the objective evaluation criteria and prediction methods for RSI.

Utility of topical agents for radiation dermatitis and pain: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

Although topical agents are often provided during radiation therapy, there is limited consensus and evidence for their use prophylactically to prevent or reduce radiation dermatitis.

METHODS

This was a multi-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study of 191 breast cancer patients to compare the prophylactic effectiveness of three topical agents (Curcumin, HPR Plus™, and Placebo) for reducing radiation dermatitis and associated pain. Patients applied the topical agent to their skin in the radiation area site three times daily starting the first day of radiation therapy (RT) until 1 week after RT completion.

RESULTS

Of the 191 randomized patients, 171 patients were included in the final analyses (87.5% white females, mean age = 58 (range = 36-88)). Mean radiation dermatitis severity (RDS) scores did not significantly differ between study arms (Curcumin = 2.68 [2.49, 2.86]; HPR Plus™ = 2.64 [2.45, 2.82]; Placebo = 2.63 [2.44, 2.83]; p = 0.929). Logistic regression analyses showed that increased breast field separation positively correlated with increased radiation dermatitis severity (p = 0.018). In patients with high breast field separation (≥ 25 cm), RDS scores (Curcumin = 2.70 [2.21, 3.19]; HPR Plus™ = 3.57 [3.16, 4.00]; Placebo = 2.95 [2.60, 3.30]; p = 0.024) and pain scores (Curcumin = 0.52 [- 0.28, 1.33]; HPR Plus™ = 0.55 [- 0.19, 1.30]; Placebo = 1.73 [0.97, 2.50]; p = 0.046) significantly differed at the end of RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were no significant effects of the treatment groups on the overall population, our exploratory subgroup analysis suggests that prophylactic treatment with topical curcumin may be effective for minimizing skin reactions and pain for patients with high breast separation (≥ 25 cm) who may have the worst skin reactions.