1
|
Waugh E, Glinka J, Breadner D, Liu R, Tang E, Allen L, Welch S, Leslie K, Skaro A. Survival benefit of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:229-237. [PMID: 38296221 PMCID: PMC11128787 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims While patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) are a target population for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), formal guidelines for neoadjuvant therapy are lacking. We assessed the perioperative and oncological outcomes in patients with BRPC undergoing NAC with FOLFIRINOX for patients undergoing upfront surgery (US). Methods The AHPBA criteria for borderline resectability and/or a CA19-9 level > 100 μ/mL defined borderline resectable tumors retrieved from a prospectively populated institutional registry from 2007 to 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 1 and 3 years. A Cox Proportional Hazard model based on intention to treat was used. A receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed to assess the discriminatory capability of the use of CA19-9 > 100 μ/mL to predict resectability and mortality. Results Forty BRPC patients underwent NAC, while 46 underwent US. The median OS with NAC was 19.8 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10.3-44.24) vs. 10.6 months (IQR, 6.37-17.6) with US. At 1 year, 70% of the NAC group and 41.3% of the US group survived (p = 0.008). At 3 years, 42.5 % of the NAC group and 10.9% of the US group survived (p = 0.001). NAC significantly reduced the hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.54; p = 0.001). CA19-9 > 100 μ/mL showed poor discrimination in predicting mortality, but was a moderate predictor of resectability. Conclusions We found a survival benefit of NAC with FOLFIRINOX for BRPC. Greater pre-treatment of CA19-9 and multivessel involvement on initial imaging were associated with progression of the disease following NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Waugh
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Juan Glinka
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Breadner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Liu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ephraim Tang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Allen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen Welch
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ken Leslie
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Anton Skaro
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okamura Y, Nishitai R, Sasaki N, Ito H, Sakamoto T, Itokawa Y, Kusumoto M, Nakai Y, Yamaoka T, Manaka D. Neoadjuvant therapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with S-1 for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38771310 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
AIM We evaluated the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (NAC-IMRT) in patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). METHODS BRPC patients were treated with IMRT (45 Gy/15fr) combined with two courses of S-1 (40 mg/m2 bid) before surgery. Outcomes after NAC-IMRT, surgery, and survival were then evaluated. This single-center retrospective study assessed 26 consecutive patients. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (BR-PV: 7, BR-A: 19) with a median age of 73 years were enrolled from 2016 to 2021. Ten (38%) patients were 75-years-old and above. Twenty-three patients completed NAC-IMRT treatment. The median reductions in tumor size and cancer antigen 19-9 level were 13.6% and 69%, respectively. All 26 patients underwent resection within a median time of 71 days after NAC-IMRT initiation. R0 resection was achieved in 24 patients (92%). The median overall survival (OS) was 28.0 months, and the 1- and 3-year OS rates were 100% and 34%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.5 months, and the 1- and 3-year PFS rates were 50% and 32%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in OS between the patients under and over the age of 75 (29 vs. 20 months, p = 0.86). The 12 patients who completed NAC-IMRT, resection, and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) exhibited a 3-year survival rate of 73%, which was significantly better than that of the patients who did not receive or complete AC (median OS, not reached vs. 19 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION NAC-IMRT showed outstanding clinical efficacy with acceptable tolerability in patients with BRPC, including geriatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Okamura
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryuta Nishitai
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoya Sasaki
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Sakamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshio Itokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Medicine, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masanori Kusumoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Medicine, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterological Medicine, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshihide Yamaoka
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Dai Manaka
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ross SB, Popover J, Sucandy I, Christodoulou M, Pattilachan TM, Rosemurgy AS. The Oncological Stress Test of Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review in Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Compared to Upfront Resection Approach for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 2024:31348241248703. [PMID: 38635295 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, increasingly diagnosed in the United States, has a disheartening initial resection rate of 15%. Neoadjuvant therapy, particularly FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based regimens, is gaining favor for its potential to improve resectability rates and achieving microscopically negative margins (R0) in borderline resectable cases, marked by intricate arterial or venous involvement. Despite surgery being the sole curative approach, actual benefit of neoadjuvant therapy remains debatable. This study scrutinizes current literature on oncological outcomes post-resection of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A MEDLINE/PubMed search was conducted to systematically compare oncological outcomes of patients treated with either neoadjuvant therapy with intent of curative resection or an "upfront resection" approach. A total of 1293 studies were initially screened and 30 were included (n = 1714) in this analysis. All studies included data on outcomes of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma being treated with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 1387) or a resection-first approach (n = 356). Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy underwent resection 52% of the time, achieving negative margins of 43% (n = 601). Approximately 77% of patients who received an upfront resection underwent a successful resection, with 39% achieving negative margins. Neoadjuvant therapy remains marginally efficacious in treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, as patients undergo an operation and successful resection less often when treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Rates of curative resection are comparable, despite neoadjuvant therapy being a primary recommendation in borderline resectable cases and employed more often than upfront resection. Upfront resection may offer improved resection rates by intention-to-treat, which can provide more patients with paths to curative resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharona B Ross
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jesse Popover
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jethwa KR, Kim E, Berlin J, Anker CJ, Tchelebi L, Abood G, Hallemeier CL, Jabbour S, Kennedy T, Kumar R, Lee P, Sharma N, Small W, Williams V, Russo S. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines. Am J Clin Oncol 2024; 47:185-199. [PMID: 38131628 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
For patients with locoregionally confined pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), margin-negative surgical resection is the only known curative treatment; however, the majority of patients are not operable candidates at initial diagnosis. Among patients with resectable disease who undergo surgery alone, the 5-year survival remains poor. Adjuvant therapies, including systemic therapy or chemoradiation, are utilized as they improve locoregional control and overall survival. There has been increasing interest in the use of neoadjuvant therapy to obtain early control of occult metastatic disease, allow local tumor response to facilitate margin-negative resection, and provide a test of time and biology to assist with the selection of candidates most likely to benefit from radical surgical resection. However, limited guidance exists regarding the relative effectiveness of treatment options. In this systematic review, the American Radium Society multidisciplinary gastrointestinal expert panel convened to develop Appropriate Use Criteria evaluating the evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment for patients with PDAC, including surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy, in terms of oncologic outcomes and quality of life. The evidence was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) design framework and "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included phases 2 to 3 trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2022 in the Ovid Medline database. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined to guide practitioners in the management of patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jordan Berlin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Leila Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead
| | | | | | | | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington DC
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, PA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Vonetta Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Umezawa R, Mizuma M, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto T, Takahashi N, Suzuki Y, Kishida K, Omata S, Unno M, Jingu K. Clinical impact of multimodal treatment including chemoradiotherapy, conversion surgery and postoperative chemotherapy for borderline resectable and unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer without disease progression after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Pancreatology 2023; 23:650-656. [PMID: 37453848 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate treatment outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using S-1 with or without conversion surgery after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for borderline resectable (BR) and unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) pancreatic cancer. METHODS From 2016 to 2020, patients without disease progression after GnP for BR or UR-LA pancreatic cancer underwent CRT with S-1. If distant metastasis was not detected after CRT, conversion surgery and oral administration of S-1 as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for at least 6 months was performed. RESULTS Forty patients were included in the present study. The median number of cycles of GnP was 6. Surgery was performed after CRT in 25 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) periods from the start of radiotherapy were 24.6 and 27.4 months, respectively. The OS periods from the start of radiotherapy in patients who underwent conversion surgery and those who did not undergo conversion surgery were 41.3 and 16.8 months, respectively. The PFS periods from the start of radiotherapy in patients who underwent surgery and those who did not undergo surgery were 28.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. Patients who were able to receive S-1 after conversion surgery for more than 6 months had better OS than those who were not (p = 0.039), although there was no significant difference of PFS (p = 0.365). CONCLUSIONS In BR/UR-LA pancreatic cancer without disease progression after GnP, multimodal treatment including CRT, conversion surgery and the scheduled postoperative chemotherapy may be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
| | - Masamichi Mizuma
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kei Nakagawa
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yu Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keita Kishida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - So Omata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Palm RF, Boyer E, Kim DW, Denbo J, Hodul PJ, Malafa M, Fleming JB, Shridhar R, Chuong MD, Mellon EA, Frakes JM, Hoffe SE. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for borderline resectable pancreas adenocarcinoma: influence of vascular margin status and type of chemotherapy. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1110-1120. [PMID: 37286392 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of chemotherapy type and vascular margin status after sequential chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is unknown. METHODS A retrospective review was performed on BRPC patients treated with chemotherapy and 5-fraction SBRT from 2009 to 2021. Surgical outcomes and SBRT-related toxicity were reported. Clinical outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier with log rank comparisons. RESULTS A total of 303 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT to a median dose of 40 Gy prescribed to the tumor-vessel interface and median dose of 32.4 Gyto 95% of the gross tumor volume. One hundred and sixty-nine patients (56%) were resected and benefited from improved median OS (41.1 vs 15.5 months, P < 0.001). Close/positive vascular margins were not associated with worse OS or FFLRF. Type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not influence OS for resected patients, but FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved median OS in unresected patients (18.2 vs 13.1 months, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION For BRPC, the effect of a positive or close vascular margin may be mitigated by neoadjuvant therapy. Shorter duration neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as the optimal biological effective dose of radiotherapy should be prospectively explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell F Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA.
| | - Emanuel Boyer
- University of South Florida School of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dae W Kim
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Jason Denbo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Pamela J Hodul
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Mokenge Malafa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Jason B Fleming
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Ravi Shridhar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advent Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Michael D Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami FL, USA
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jessica M Frakes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Sarah E Hoffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu HY, Li JW, Li JZ, Zhai QL, Ye JY, Zheng SY, Fang K. Comprehensive multimodal management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Current status and progress. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:142-162. [PMID: 36896309 PMCID: PMC9988647 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is a complex clinical entity with specific biological features. Criteria for resectability need to be assessed in combination with tumor anatomy and oncology. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for BRPC patients is associated with additional survival benefits. Research is currently focused on exploring the optimal NAT regimen and more reliable ways of assessing response to NAT. More attention to management standards during NAT, including biliary drainage and nutritional support, is needed. Surgery remains the cornerstone of BRPC treatment and multidisciplinary teams can help to evaluate whether patients are suitable for surgery and provide individualized management during the perioperative period, including NAT responsiveness and the selection of surgical timing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Yu Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Jin-Wei Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou 545000, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Jin-Zheng Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Qi-Long Zhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Jing-Yuan Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Si-Yuan Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Kun Fang
- Department of Surgery, Yinchuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yinchuan 750000, Ningxia, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hughes R, Snook AE, Mueller AC. The poorly immunogenic tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer: the impact of radiation therapy, and strategies targeting resistance. Immunotherapy 2022; 14:1393-1405. [PMID: 36468417 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2022-0046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers, due to its uniquely aggressive behavior and resistance to therapy. The tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer is immunosuppressive, and attempts at utilizing immunotherapies have been unsuccessful. Radiation therapy (RT) results in immune activation and antigen presentation in other cancers, but in pancreatic cancer has had limited success in stimulating immune responses. RT activates common pathways of fibrosis and chronic inflammation seen in pancreatic cancer, resulting in immune suppression. Here we describe the pancreatic tumor microenvironment with regard to fibrosis, myeloid and lymphoid cells, and the impact of RT. We also describe strategies of targeting these pathways that have promise to improve outcomes by harnessing the cytotoxic and immune-activating aspects of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Hughes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Adam E Snook
- Department of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.,Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Adam C Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Multiagent Chemotherapy Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Resected Pancreas Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2022; 45:450-457. [PMID: 36318696 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Chemotherapy followed by margin-negative resection (R0) is the treatment of choice for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy (MAC) or MAC then radiotherapy (RT) may optimize surgical candidacy. The purpose of this study was to compare pathologic outcomes of MAC followed by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CRT) versus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with resected PDAC. METHODS Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic PDAC between 2012 and 2017 and who received preoperative MAC or MAC+RT were identified in the National Cancer Database. Variables associated with R0 and overall survival were identified with logistic regression and Cox analysis (P<0.05). RESULTS A total of 5273 patients were identified (MAC: 3900, MAC+CRT: 955, MAC+SBRT: 418). The median RT dose/fraction (fx) in the MAC+CRT and MAC+SBRT cohorts was 50.4 Gy/28 fx and 33 Gy/5 fx. Patients receiving MAC+CRT versus MAC+SBRT had similar rates of ypT3-T4 disease (54% vs. 58%, P=0.187), R0 (87% vs. 84%, P=0.168), and pathologic complete response (pathologic complete response; 6% vs. 4%, P=0.052), however, MAC+CRT was associated with less regional lymphatic disease (ypN+: 28% vs. 41%, P<0.001). The median overall survival of patients receiving MAC+CRT versus MAC+SBRT was 24.6 versus 29.5 months (P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS For patients with resected PDAC, MAC+CRT, and MAC+SBRT had similar rates of R0 and pathologic complete response, although MAC+CRT was associated with lower ypN+. Prospective evaluation of neoadjuvant RT regimens with attention to radiation therapy design is warranted.
Collapse
|
10
|
Acuna-Villaorduna A, Shankar V, Wysota M, Jirgal A, Kabarriti R, Bellemare S, Goldman I, Kaubisch A, Aparo S, Goel S, Chuy J. Induction Chemotherapy With FOLFIRINOX Followed by Chemoradiation With Gemcitabine in Patients With Borderline-Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221134411. [PMID: 36221952 PMCID: PMC9558866 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221134411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Perioperative therapy is standard for patients with borderline-resectable
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC); however, an optimal neoadjuvant
regimen is lacking. We assessed the efficacy of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy
followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation as preoperative therapy. Methods Patients received 4 cycles of FOLFIRINOX, followed by 6-weekly gemcitabine
with concomitant intensity-modulated radiation. The primary endpoint was the
R0 resection rate. Secondary outcomes included resection rate,
overall-response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS),
and tolerability. The trial was terminated early due to slow accrual. A
Simon’s optimal two-stage phase II trial single arm design was used. The
primary hypothesis of treatment efficacy was tested using a multistage group
sequential inference procedure. The secondary failure time analysis
endpoints were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier procedure and the Cox
regression model. Results A total of 22 patients enrolled in the study, 18 (81.8%) completed
neoadjuvant treatment. The bias corrected R0 rate was 55.6% (90% CI: 33.3,
68.3; P value = .16) among patients that received at least
1 cycle of FOLFIRINOX and was 80% among patients that underwent surgery. The
median OS was 35.1 months. The median PFS among patients that underwent
surgery was 34 months. Conclusion An R0 resection rate of 55.6% is favorable. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed
by concomitant Gemcitabine with radiation was well-tolerated.
NCT01897454
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Acuna-Villaorduna
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Medical Oncology,
Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NY, USA
| | - Viswanathan Shankar
- Department of Epidemiology &
Population Health, Albert Einstein College of
Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Michael Wysota
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Medical Oncology,
Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NY, USA
| | - Amanda Jirgal
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Radiation Oncology,
Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NY, USA
| | - Sarah Bellemare
- Department of Surgery,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Surgery,
Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NY, USA
| | - Inessa Goldman
- Department of Radiology,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Radiology,
Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NY, USA
| | - Andreas Kaubisch
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Medical Oncology,
Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NY, USA
| | - Santiago Aparo
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Medical Oncology,
Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NY, USA
| | - Sanjay Goel
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Medical Oncology,
Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NY, USA,Sanjay Goel, MD, MS, Professor of Medicine,
Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore
Medical Center, 1695 Eastchester Road, Bronx NY 10461, USA.
; Jennifer Chuy, MD, Assistant
Professor of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College
of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 1695 Eastchester Road, Bronx NY 10461,
USA.
| | - Jennifer Chuy
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Department of Medical Oncology,
Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NY, USA,Sanjay Goel, MD, MS, Professor of Medicine,
Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore
Medical Center, 1695 Eastchester Road, Bronx NY 10461, USA.
; Jennifer Chuy, MD, Assistant
Professor of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College
of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 1695 Eastchester Road, Bronx NY 10461,
USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Puleo A, Malla M, Boone BA. Defining the Optimal Duration of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Time for a Personalized Approach? Pancreas 2022; 51:1083-1091. [PMID: 37078929 PMCID: PMC10144367 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Despite recent advances, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to be associated with dismal outcomes, with a cure evading most patients. While historic treatment for PDAC has been surgical resection followed by 6 months of adjuvant therapy, there has been a recent shift toward neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). Several considerations support this approach, including the characteristic early systemic spread of PDAC, and the morbidity often surrounding pancreatic resection, which can delay recovery and preclude patients from starting adjuvant treatment. The addition of NAT has been suggested to improve margin-negative resection rates, decrease lymph node positivity, and potentially translate to improved survival. Conversely, complications and disease progression can occur during preoperative treatment, potentially eliminating the chance of curative resection. As NAT utilization has increased, treatment durations have been found to vary widely between institutions with an optimal duration remaining undefined. In this review, we assess the existing literature on NAT for PDAC, reviewing treatment durations reported across retrospective case series and prospective clinical trials to establish currently used approaches and seek the optimal duration. We also analyze markers of treatment response and review the potential for personalized approaches that may help clarify this important treatment question and move NAT toward a more standardized approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Puleo
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery
| | - Midhun Malla
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine
| | - Brian A. Boone
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huguet F, Cerbai C, Ta MH, Sarrade T, Evin C, Aziez S, Rivin Del Campo E, Durand B, Loi M. Neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Chemoradiation or stereotactic body radiation therapy? Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:858-864. [PMID: 35987811 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Despite recent advances, the prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinomas remains poor, even for patients with resectable tumors. For these latter, new approaches based on neoadjuvant treatment have been developed. Two components are used: chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT). Indeed, pre-operative RT has many advantages in terms of efficacy and tolerance. It increases notably the chances of subsequent complete tumor resection. Several prospective trials are currently ongoing to clarify its place in the therapeutic arsenal. Another crucial question is to know which is the best RT technique: conventional normofractionated chemoradiotherapy or hypofrationated stereotactic body RT?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, institut universitaire de cancérologie, 4, rue de la Chine, Paris, France; Inserm U938 Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France.
| | - C Cerbai
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, institut universitaire de cancérologie, 4, rue de la Chine, Paris, France; Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - M H Ta
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, institut universitaire de cancérologie, 4, rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - T Sarrade
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, institut universitaire de cancérologie, 4, rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - C Evin
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, institut universitaire de cancérologie, 4, rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - S Aziez
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, institut universitaire de cancérologie, 4, rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, institut universitaire de cancérologie, 4, rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - B Durand
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, institut universitaire de cancérologie, 4, rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - M Loi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Turner KM, Delman AM, Kharofa JR, Smith MT, Choe KA, Olowokure O, Wilson GC, Patel SH, Sohal D, Ahmad SA. Radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A review. Surgery 2022; 172:284-290. [PMID: 35034793 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer constitutes a complex clinical entity, presenting the clinician with a locally aggressive disease that has a proclivity for distant spread. The benefits of radiation therapy, such as improved local control and improved survival, have been questioned. In this review we seek to summarize the existing evidence on radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and highlight future areas of research. METHODS A comprehensive review of PubMed for clinical studies reporting outcomes in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer was performed in June 2021, with an emphasis placed on prospective studies. RESULTS Radiologic "downstaging" in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is a rare event, although some evidence shows increased clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over radiation therapy. Margin status seems to be equivalent between regimens that use neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and regimens that include neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Local control in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is likely improved with radiation therapy; however, the benefit of improved local control in a disease marked by systemic failure has been questioned. Although some studies have shown improved survival with radiation therapy, differences in the delivery and tolerance of chemotherapy between the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting confound these results. When the evidence is evaluated as a whole, there is no clear survival benefit of radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION Once considered a staple of therapy, the role of radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is evolving as systemic therapy regimens continues to improve. Increased clinical understanding of disease phenotype and response are needed to accurately tailor therapy for individual patients and to improve outcomes in this complex patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Turner
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Aaron M Delman
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Jordan R Kharofa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Milton T Smith
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Kyuran A Choe
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Olugbenga Olowokure
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Gregory C Wilson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Davendra Sohal
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang C, Tan G, Zhang J, Fan B, Chen Y, Chen D, Yang L, Chen X, Duan Q, Maimaiti F, Du J, Lin Z, Gu J, Luo H. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where Do We Go? Front Oncol 2022; 12:828223. [PMID: 35785193 PMCID: PMC9245892 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.828223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been on the rise in recent years; however, its clinical diagnosis and treatment remain challenging. Although surgical resection remains the only chance for long-term patient survival, the likelihood of initial resectability is no higher than 20%. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in PDAC aims to transform the proportion of inoperable PDACs into operable cases and reduce the likelihood of recurrence to improve overall survival. Ongoing phase 3 clinical trial aims to validate the role of NAT in PDAC therapy, including prolongation of survival, increased R0 resection, and a higher proportion of negative lymph nodes. Controversies surrounding the role of NAT in PDAC treatment include applicability to different stages of PDAC, chemotherapy regimens, radiation, duration of treatment, and assessment of effect. This review aims to summarize the current progress and controversies of NAT in PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenqi Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Guang Tan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Bin Fan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Northwest University (Xi’an No. 1 Hospital), Xi’an, China
| | - Yunlong Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Dan Chen
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Lili Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xiang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Qingzhu Duan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Feiliyan Maimaiti
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Jian Du
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Zhikun Lin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Jiangning Gu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- *Correspondence: Haifeng Luo, ; Jiangning Gu,
| | - Haifeng Luo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- *Correspondence: Haifeng Luo, ; Jiangning Gu,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Barrak D, Villano AM, Villafane-Ferriol N, Stockton LG, Hill MV, Deng M, Handorf EA, Reddy SS. Total neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma increases probability for a complete pathologic response. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1356-1361. [PMID: 35016837 PMCID: PMC9233019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple neoadjuvant therapy protocols have been proposed in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiation (CRT), and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), defined as a CT plus CRT. A pathologic complete response (pCR) can be achieved in a minority of cases. We hypothesize that TNT is more likely to confer pCR than other neoadjuvant therapies, which may improve overall survival (OS). METHODS A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2006 to 2016 was performed, identifying patients who underwent any neoadjuvant therapy followed by definitive pancreatic resection for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A pathologic complete response was defined as down-staging from any clinical stage to pathologic stage 0. RESULTS A total of 5402 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection were identified. 177 patients (3.3%) achieved a pCR. Of the patients who achieved a pCR, 57 received CT, 41 CRT and 79 received TNT. On multivariate analysis, TNT was more likely to confer a pCR than CRT (OR 1.67, CI 1.13-2.46, p = 0.0103) or CT (OR 2.61, CI 1.83-3.71, p < 0.0001). Patients who achieved pCR had a significantly higher OS, with median survival of 64.9 months, compared to 21.6 months in patients who did not achieve pCR (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION TNT may be more likely to achieve a pCR than CT or CRT. Patients who achieve a pCR have a significant OS benefit as compared to those who have residual disease. TNT should be considered for patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy, as it may increase the likelihood of achieving a pCR, thus potentially improving OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dany Barrak
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Anthony M Villano
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Nicole Villafane-Ferriol
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Leah G Stockton
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Maureen V Hill
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Mengying Deng
- Departments of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Handorf
- Departments of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Sanjay S Reddy
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gartrell RD, Enzler T, Kim PS, Fullerton BT, Fazlollahi L, Chen AX, Minns HE, Perni S, Weisberg SP, Rizk EM, Wang S, Oh EJ, Guo XV, Chiuzan C, Manji GA, Bates SE, Chabot J, Schrope B, Kluger M, Emond J, Rabadán R, Farber D, Remotti HE, Horowitz DP, Saenger YM. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation alters the immune microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2022; 11:2066767. [PMID: 35558160 PMCID: PMC9090285 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2022.2066767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have a grim prognosis despite complete surgical resection and intense systemic therapies. While immunotherapies have been beneficial with many different types of solid tumors, they have almost uniformly failed in the treatment of PDAC. Understanding how therapies affect the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) can provide insights for the development of strategies to treat PDAC. We used quantitative multiplexed immunofluorescence (qmIF) quantitative spatial analysis (qSA), and immunogenomic (IG) analysis to analyze formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) primary tumor specimens from 44 patients with PDAC including 18 treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and 26 patients receiving no treatment (NT) and compared them with tissues from 40 treatment-naïve melanoma patients. We find that relative to NT tumors, CD3+ T cell infiltration was increased in CRT treated tumors (p = .0006), including increases in CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CTLs, p = .0079), CD3+CD4+FOXP3- T helper cells (Th, p = .0010), and CD3+CD4+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs, p = .0089) with no difference in CD68+ macrophages. IG analysis from micro-dissected tissues indicated overexpression of genes involved in antigen presentation, T cell activation, and inflammation in CRT treated tumors. Among treated patients, a higher ratio of Tregs to total T cells was associated with shorter survival time (p = .0121). Despite comparable levels of infiltrating T cells in CRT PDACs to melanoma, PDACs displayed distinct spatial profiles with less T cell clustering as defined by nearest neighbor analysis (p < .001). These findings demonstrate that, while CRT can achieve high T cell densities in PDAC compared to melanoma, phenotype and spatial organization of T cells may limit benefit of T cell infiltration in this immunotherapy-resistant tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn D. Gartrell
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Enzler
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Pan S. Kim
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin T. Fullerton
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ladan Fazlollahi
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew X. Chen
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hanna E. Minns
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Subha Perni
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stuart P. Weisberg
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emanuelle M. Rizk
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel Wang
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eun Jeong Oh
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xinzheng V. Guo
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Codruta Chiuzan
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gulam A. Manji
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan E. Bates
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Chabot
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Beth Schrope
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Kluger
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jean Emond
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Raul Rabadán
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna Farber
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen E. Remotti
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David P. Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Masui T, Nagai K, Anazawa T, Sato A, Uchida Y, Nakano K, Yogo A, Kaneda A, Nakamura N, Yoshimura M, Mizowaki T, Uza N, Fukuda A, Matsumoto S, Kanai M, Isoda H, Mizumoto M, Seo S, Hata K, Taura K, Kawaguchi Y, Takaori K, Uemoto S, Hatano E. Impact of neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy on borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial abutment; a prospective, open-label, phase II study in a single institution. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:119. [PMID: 35093003 PMCID: PMC8800301 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09244-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is a category of pancreatic cancer that is anatomically widely spread, and curative resection is uncommon with upfront surgery. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a form of radiation therapy that delivers precise radiation to a tumor while minimizing the dose to surrounding normal tissues. Here, we conducted a phase 2 study to estimate the curability and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using IMRT (NACIMRT) for patients with BRPC with arterial abutment (BRPC-A). Methods A total of 49 BRPC-A patients were enrolled in this study and were treated at our hospital according to the study protocol between June 2013 and March 2021. The primary endpoint was microscopically margin-negative resection (R0) rates and we subsequently analyzed safety, histological effect of the treatment as well as survivals among patients with NACIMRT. Results Twenty-nine patients (59.2%) received pancreatectomy after NACIMRT. The R0 rate in resection patients was 93.1% and that in the whole cohort was 55.1%. No mortality was encountered. Local therapeutic effects as assessed by Evans classification showed good therapeutic effect (Grade 1, 3.4%; Grade 2a, 31.0%; Grade 2b, 48.3%; Grade 3, 3.4%; Grade 4, 3.4%). Median disease-free survival was 15.5 months. Median overall survival in the whole cohort was 35.1 months. The only independent prognostic pre-NACIMRT factor identified was serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) > 400 U/ml before NACIMRT. Conclusions NACIMRT showed preferable outcome without significant operative morbidity for BRPC-A patients. NACIMRT contributes to good local tumor control, but a high initial serum CA19-9 implies poor prognosis even after neoadjuvant treatment. Trial Registration UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000011776 Registration number: UMIN000010113. Date of first registration: 01/03/2013,
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiko Masui
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Kazuyuki Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takayuki Anazawa
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Asahi Sato
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Uchida
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kenzo Nakano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akitada Yogo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kaneda
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoto Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Michio Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Norimitsu Uza
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akihisa Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shigemi Matsumoto
- Department of Real World Data Research and Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masashi Kanai
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroyoshi Isoda
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaki Mizumoto
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koichiro Hata
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kojiro Taura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiya Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kyoichi Takaori
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinji Uemoto
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kondo N, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Sumiyoshi T, Okada K, Seo S, Otsuka H, Murakami Y, Takahashi S. A phase II study of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact. Eur J Cancer 2021; 159:215-223. [PMID: 34781169 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact (BRPC-A) is extremely poor, and effective preoperative treatment is indispensable. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel and S-1 (GAS), for patients with BRPC-A. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multicentre, single-arm, phase II study was performed. Patients were administered 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine on day 1, 125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on day 1 and 60-100 mg/day S-1 on days 1-7 during a 14-day cycle. Patients were then assessed for resectability and response to treatment after six cycles. The primary end-points were 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and median OS time (trial registration: jRCTs061180045, UMIN000016630). RESULTS Forty-seven patients with BRPC-A were eligible for the present study. Six courses of neoadjuvant GAS regimen were completed in all eligible patients. The rate of grade III/IV toxicities occurred in 14 (30%) patients during the neoadjuvant GAS regimen. The response and disease control rates were 43% and 96%, respectively. Forty-five (96%) patients received potentially curative pancreatectomy, whereas two did not owing to disease progression. R0 resection was performed in 40 (86%) of 47 eligible patients. Eleven (24%) patients experienced postoperative major complications (>grade III), including one mortality. The 2-year OS rate and median OS time among 47 eligible patients were 70.1% and 41.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The neoadjuvant GAS chemotherapy regimen for BRPC-A showed good efficacy with mild toxicity, resulting in a high R0 resection rate and prolonged survival in patients with BRPC-A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naru Kondo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Kenichiro Uemura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sudo
- Department of Surgery, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, 3-1, Aoyama-cho, Kure 737-0023, Japan
| | - Yasushi Hashimoto
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima Memorial Hospital, 1-4-3, Honkawa-cho, Naka-ku, Hiroshima 730-0802, Japan
| | - Tatsuaki Sumiyoshi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Okada
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Shingo Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Otsuka
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Murakami
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima Memorial Hospital, 1-4-3, Honkawa-cho, Naka-ku, Hiroshima 730-0802, Japan; Department of Advanced Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Shinya Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yang L, Bai Y, Li Q, Chen J, Liu F, Weng X, Xu F. Analysis of the Curative Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Pancreatic Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:695645. [PMID: 34485131 PMCID: PMC8416459 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.695645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of pancreatic cancer is sharply increasing recently, which significantly increases the economic burden of the population. At present, the primary treatment of resectable pancreatic cancer is surgical resection, followed by chemotherapy with or without radiation. However, the recurrence rates remain high even after R0 resection. This treatment strategy does not distinguish undetected metastatic disease, and it is prone to postoperative complications. Neoadjuvant therapies, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, is being increasingly utilized in borderline resectable as well as resectable pancreatic cancer. This review summarized and discussed clinical trials of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer, comparing resection rates, outcome measures, and adverse reactions between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liqiong Yang
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Yun Bai
- Department of Public Health, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Qing Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Gulinxian People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, School of Chinese Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fangfang Liu
- Department of Art, Art College, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiechuan Weng
- Department of Neuroscience, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Fan Xu
- Department of Public Health, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Janssen QP, van Dam JL, Kivits IG, Besselink MG, van Eijck CHJ, Homs MYV, Nuyttens JJME, Qi H, van Santvoort HJ, Wei AC, de Wilde RF, Wilmink JW, van Tienhoven G, Groot Koerkamp B. Added Value of Radiotherapy Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8297-8308. [PMID: 34142290 PMCID: PMC8591030 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10276-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background The added value of radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer ((B)RPC) is unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX alone or combined with radiotherapy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline (ovidSP), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. The primary endpoint was pooled median overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included resection rate, R0 resection rate, and other pathologic outcomes. Results We included 512 patients with (B)RPC from 15 studies, of which 7 were prospective nonrandomized studies. In total, 351 patients (68.6%) were treated with FOLFIRINOX alone (8 studies) and 161 patients (31.4%) were treated with FOLFIRINOX and radiotherapy (7 studies). The pooled estimated median OS was 21.6 months (range 18.4–34.0 months) for FOLFIRINOX alone and 22.4 months (range 11.0–37.7 months) for FOLFIRINOX with radiotherapy. The pooled resection rate was similar (71.9% vs. 63.1%, p = 0.43) and the pooled R0 resection rate was higher for FOLFIRINOX with radiotherapy (88.0% vs. 97.6%, p = 0.045). Other pathological outcomes (ypN0, pathologic complete response, perineural invasion) were comparable. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with an improved R0 resection rate as compared with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX alone, but a difference in survival could not be demonstrated. Randomized trials are needed to determine the added value of radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with (B)PRC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10276-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quisette P Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob L van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle G Kivits
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hongchao Qi
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar J van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ma H, Wu Y, Zhang W, Zhang H, Miao Z, Zhuang C. Radiosensitization of human pancreatic cancer by piperlongumine analogues. CHINESE CHEM LETT 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
22
|
Mueller AC, Piper M, Goodspeed A, Bhuvane S, Williams JS, Bhatia S, Phan AV, Van Court B, Zolman KL, Peña B, Oweida AJ, Zakem S, Meguid C, Knitz MW, Darragh L, Bickett TE, Gadwa J, Mestroni L, Taylor MRG, Jordan KR, Dempsey P, Lucia MS, McCarter MD, Chiaro MD, Messersmith WA, Schulick RD, Goodman KA, Gough MJ, Greene CS, Costello JC, Neto AG, Lagares D, Hansen KC, Van Bokhoven A, Karam SD. Induction of ADAM10 by Radiation Therapy Drives Fibrosis, Resistance, and Epithelial-to-Mesenchyal Transition in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Res 2021; 81:3255-3269. [PMID: 33526513 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-3892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Stromal fibrosis activates prosurvival and proepithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathways in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In patient tumors treated with neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), we found upregulation of fibrosis, extracellular matrix (ECM), and EMT gene signatures, which can drive therapeutic resistance and tumor invasion. Molecular, functional, and translational analysis identified two cell-surface proteins, a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10) and ephrinB2, as drivers of fibrosis and tumor progression after radiation therapy (RT). RT resulted in increased ADAM10 expression in tumor cells, leading to cleavage of ephrinB2, which was also detected in plasma. Pharmacologic or genetic targeting of ADAM10 decreased RT-induced fibrosis and tissue tension, tumor cell migration, and invasion, sensitizing orthotopic tumors to radiation killing and prolonging mouse survival. Inhibition of ADAM10 and genetic ablation of ephrinB2 in fibroblasts reduced the metastatic potential of tumor cells after RT. Stimulation of tumor cells with ephrinB2 FC protein reversed the reduction in tumor cell invasion with ADAM10 ablation. These findings represent a model of PDAC adaptation that explains resistance and metastasis after RT and identifies a targetable pathway to enhance RT efficacy. SIGNIFICANCE: Targeting a previously unidentified adaptive resistance mechanism to radiation therapy in PDAC tumors in combination with radiation therapy could increase survival of the 40% of PDAC patients with locally advanced disease.See related commentary by Garcia Garcia et al., p. 3158 GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/81/12/3255/F1.large.jpg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Miles Piper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Andrew Goodspeed
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Shiv Bhuvane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jason S Williams
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Shilpa Bhatia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Andy V Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Benjamin Van Court
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kathryn L Zolman
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Brisa Peña
- Department of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Ayman J Oweida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,Département de médecine nucléaire et radiobiologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sara Zakem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Cheryl Meguid
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Michael W Knitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Laurel Darragh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Thomas E Bickett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jacob Gadwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Luisa Mestroni
- Department of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Matthew R G Taylor
- Department of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kimberly R Jordan
- Human Immune Monitoring Shared Resource, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Peter Dempsey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - M Scott Lucia
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Martin D McCarter
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - Casey S Greene
- Center for Health Artificial Intelligence, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - James C Costello
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Antonio Galveo Neto
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David Lagares
- Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Kirk C Hansen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Adrie Van Bokhoven
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sana D Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Evans JR, Cuneo KC, Lawrence TS. Drug-Radiotherapy Combination Trial Developments-Letter. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:355. [PMID: 33397679 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
24
|
Optimal Preoperative Multidisciplinary Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:cancers13010036. [PMID: 33374369 PMCID: PMC7794773 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary For borderline pancreatic cancer, upfront surgery was standard in the past, and the usefulness of neoadjuvant treatment has been reported in recent years. However, few studies have been conducted to date on whether there is a difference in optimal treatment between borderline resectable pancreatic cancer invading the portal vein (BR-PV) or abutting major arteries (BR-A). The objective of this study was to investigate the optimal neoadjuvant therapy for BR-PV or BR-A. We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with BR-PV and 111 patients with BR-A. In this study, we found that neoadjuvant treatment using new chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine along with nab-paclitaxel) is essential for improving the prognosis of BR pancreatic cancer. These findings suggest that prognosis may be prolonged by maintaining good nutritional status during preoperative treatment. Abstract Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the optimal neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer invading the portal vein (BR-PV) or abutting major arteries (BR-A). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with BR-PV and 111 patients with BR-A. Results: In BR-PV patients who underwent upfront surgery (n = 46)/NAT (n = 42), survival was significantly better in the NAT group (3-year overall survival (OS): 5.8%/35.5%, p = 0.004). In BR-A patients who underwent upfront surgery (n = 48)/NAT (n = 63), survival was also significantly better in the NAT group (3-year OS:15.5%/41.7%, p < 0.001). The prognosis tended to be better in patients who received newer chemotherapeutic regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel. In 36 BR-PV patients who underwent surgery after NAT, univariate analysis revealed that normalization of tumor marker (TM) levels (p = 0.028) and preoperative high prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (p = 0.022) were significantly associated with a favorable prognosis. In 39 BR-A patients who underwent surgery after NAT, multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative PNI > 42.5 was an independent prognostic factor (HR: 0.15, p = 0.014). Conclusions: NAT using newer chemotherapy is essential for improving the prognosis of BR pancreatic cancer. These findings suggest that prognosis may be prolonged by maintaining good nutritional status during preoperative treatment.
Collapse
|
25
|
Miccio JA, Talcott WJ, Patel T, Park HS, Cecchini M, Salem RR, Khan SA, Stein S, Kortmansky JS, Lacy J, Narang A, Herman J, Jabbour SK, Hallemeier CL, Johung K, Jethwa KR. Margin negative resection and pathologic downstaging with multiagent chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with localized pancreas cancer: A national cancer database analysis. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 27:15-23. [PMID: 33392398 PMCID: PMC7772693 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Margin-negative (R0) resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Pre-operative multi-agent chemotherapy alone (MAC) or MAC followed by pre-operative radiotherapy (MAC + RT) may be used to improve resectability and potentially survival. However, the optimal pre-operative regimen is unknown. Methods Patients with non-metastatic PDAC from 2006 to 2016 who received pre-operative MAC or MAC + RT before oncologic resection were identified in the National Cancer Database. Univariable and multivariable (MVA) associates with R0 resection were identified with logistic regression, and survival was analyzed secondarily with the Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Results 4,599 patients were identified (MAC: 3,109, MAC + RT: 1,490). Compared to those receiving MAC, patients receiving MAC + RT were more likely to have cT3-4 disease (76% vs 64%, p < 0.001) and cN + disease (33% vs 29%, p = 0.010), but were less likely to have ypT3-4 disease (59% vs 74%, p < 0.001) and ypN + disease (32% vs 55%, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a pathologic complete response (5% vs 2%, p < 0.001) and R0 resection (86% vs 80%, p < 0.001). On MVA, MAC + RT (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.33-1.89, p < 0.001), evaluation at an academic center (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.56, p < 0.001), and female sex (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.67, p < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of R0 resection, while cT3-4 disease (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96, p = 0.013) was associated with lower odds of R0 resection. Conclusion For patients with localized PDAC who receive pre-operative MAC, the addition of pre-operative RT was associated with improved rates of R0 resection and pathologic response.
Collapse
Key Words
- AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer
- Chemotherapy
- IQR, interquartile range
- LR, logistic regression
- LVI, lymphovascular invasion
- MAC, multiagent chemotherapy
- MVA, multivariable analysis
- NCDB, National Cancer Database
- Neoadjuvant therapy
- OS, overall survival
- PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- Pancreatic cancer
- R0, margin negative
- RT, radiotherapy
- Radiotherapy
- Surgery
- UVA, univariable analysis
- pCR, pathologic complete response
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A Miccio
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Wesley J Talcott
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Timil Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Henry S Park
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Michael Cecchini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Ronald R Salem
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Sajid A Khan
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Stacey Stein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Jeremy S Kortmansky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Jill Lacy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Kimberly Johung
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nguyen L, Schilling D, Dobiasch S, Raulefs S, Santiago Franco M, Buschmann D, Pfaffl MW, Schmid TE, Combs SE. The Emerging Role of miRNAs for the Radiation Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123703. [PMID: 33317198 PMCID: PMC7763922 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate. Radiotherapy is one treatment option within a multimodal therapy approach for patients with locally advanced, non-resectable pancreatic tumors. However, radiotherapy is only effective in about one-third of the patients. Therefore, biomarkers that can predict the response to radiotherapy are of utmost importance. Recently, microRNAs, small non-coding RNAs regulating gene expression, have come into focus as there is growing evidence that microRNAs could serve as diagnostic, predictive and prognostic biomarkers in various cancer entities, including pancreatic cancer. Moreover, their high stability in body fluids such as serum and plasma render them attractive candidates for non-invasive biomarkers. This article describes the role of microRNAs as suitable blood biomarkers and outlines an overview of radiation-induced microRNAs changes and the association with radioresistance in pancreatic cancer. Abstract Today, pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with a five-year overall survival rate of less than 7%. Only 15–20% of patients are eligible for curative intent surgery at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, neoadjuvant treatment regimens have been introduced in order to downsize the tumor by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. To further increase the efficacy of radiotherapy, novel molecular biomarkers are urgently needed to define the subgroup of pancreatic cancer patients who would benefit most from radiotherapy. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) could have the potential to serve as novel predictive and prognostic biomarkers in patients with pancreatic cancer. In the present article, the role of miRNAs as blood biomarkers, which are associated with either radioresistance or radiation-induced changes of miRNAs in pancreatic cancer, is discussed. Furthermore, the manuscript provides own data of miRNAs identified in a pancreatic cancer mouse model as well as radiation-induced miRNA changes in the plasma of tumor-bearing mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily Nguyen
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Raulefs
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Marina Santiago Franco
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
| | - Dominik Buschmann
- Division of Animal Physiology and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany; (D.B.); (M.W.P.)
| | - Michael W. Pfaffl
- Division of Animal Physiology and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany; (D.B.); (M.W.P.)
| | - Thomas E. Schmid
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4140-4501
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yu Y, Zheng P, Chen Y, Wang B, Paul ME, Tao P, Wang D, Li H, Gu B, Gao L, Wang D, Chen H. Advances and challenges of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2020; 17:425-434. [PMID: 33164329 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has been becoming the second cause of cancer death in the western world, and its disease burden has increased. Neoadjuvant therapy is one of the current research hotspots in the field of pancreatic cancer, aiming to improve the surgical rate and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Based on the latest evidence, this review discussed neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer from the following three aspects: patient selection, protocols selection of neoadjuvant therapy, and treatment response evaluation and resectability prediction. A big controversy existed on the indications of neoadjuvant treatment, but it was agreed that any patient who is likely to achieve R0 resection due to neoadjuvant therapy should be the targeted population. A variety of chemotherapy regimens were tried for neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer, and FOLFIRINOX and Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine are two preferred regimens at present. It was challenging to evaluate treatment response and predict resectability after neoadjuvant therapy, although imaging by CT is widely used. Based on new findings of the remarkable performance of several chemotherapy regimens with or without radiotherapy, the neoadjuvant indications of pancreatic cancer have extended in recent years. However, it is still a challenge to assess the neoadjuvant treatment response and determine the timing of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yu
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Peng Zheng
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yajing Chen
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Bofang Wang
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Maswikiti Ewetse Paul
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Pengxian Tao
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Dengfeng Wang
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Haiyuan Li
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Baohong Gu
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Lei Gao
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Dan Wang
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| | - Hao Chen
- The Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China.,The Key Laboratory of the Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gromisch C, Qadan M, Machado MA, Liu K, Colson Y, Grinstaff MW. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Unconventional Approaches for an Unconventional Disease. Cancer Res 2020; 80:3179-3192. [PMID: 32220831 PMCID: PMC7755309 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-2731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This review highlights current treatments, limitations, and pitfalls in the management of pancreatic cancer and discusses current research in novel targets and drug development to overcome these clinical challenges. We begin with a review of the clinical landscape of pancreatic cancer, including genetic and environmental risk factors, as well as limitations in disease diagnosis and prevention. We next discuss current treatment paradigms for pancreatic cancer and the shortcomings of targeted therapy in this disease. Targeting major driver mutations in pancreatic cancer, such as dysregulation in the KRAS and TGFβ signaling pathways, have failed to improve survival outcomes compared with nontargeted chemotherapy; thus, we describe new advances in therapy such as Ras-binding pocket inhibitors. We then review next-generation approaches in nanomedicine and drug delivery, focusing on preclinical advancements in novel optical probes, antibodies, small-molecule agents, and nucleic acids to improve surgical outcomes in resectable disease, augment current therapies, expand druggable targets, and minimize morbidity. We conclude by summarizing progress in current research, identifying areas for future exploration in drug development and nanotechnology, and discussing future prospects for management of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gromisch
- Departments of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Biomedical Engineering, and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mariana Albuquerque Machado
- Departments of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Biomedical Engineering, and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kebin Liu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Georgia Cancer Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Yolonda Colson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark W Grinstaff
- Departments of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Biomedical Engineering, and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chargari C, Levy A, Paoletti X, Soria JC, Massard C, Weichselbaum RR, Deutsch E. Methodological Development of Combination Drug and Radiotherapy in Basic and Clinical Research. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:4723-4736. [PMID: 32409306 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-4155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Newer technical improvements in radiation oncology have been rapidly implemented in recent decades, allowing an improved therapeutic ratio. The development of strategies using local and systemic treatments concurrently, mainly targeted therapies, has however plateaued. Targeted molecular compounds and immunotherapy are increasingly being incorporated as the new standard of care for a wide array of cancers. A better understanding of possible prior methodology issues is therefore required and should be integrated into upcoming early clinical trials including individualized radiotherapy-drug combinations. The outcome of clinical trials is influenced by the validity of the preclinical proofs of concept, the impact on normal tissue, the robustness of biomarkers and the quality of the delivery of radiation. Herein, key methodological aspects are discussed with the aim of optimizing the design and implementation of future precision drug-radiotherapy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Brétigny sur Orge, France
| | - Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
- Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Xavier Paoletti
- University of Versailles St. Quentin, France
- Institut Curie INSERM U900, Biostatistics for Personalized Medicine Team, St. Cloud, France
| | | | - Christophe Massard
- Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Ralph R Weichselbaum
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
- Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|