1
|
Clivio A, Zwahlen DR, Koch S, Negreanu C, Barletta E, Haerle H, Hofmann E, Oehler C. Thyroid avoidance in treatment planning for breast cancer patients irradiated to the supraclavicular nodes. Strahlenther Onkol 2025; 201:589-600. [PMID: 39585411 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02321-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/22/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypothyroidism affects up to 21% of women with breast cancer after supraclavicular node irradiation. The PENTEC (pediatric normal tissue effects in the clinic) initiative highlighted the need to minimize the thyroid dose, albeit without giving a specific constraint. This study aimed to define a reasonable target thyroid mean dose (Dmean) between 10 and 15 Gy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and examine its impact on the hypothyroidism risk. METHODS Forty-three breast cancer patients with supraclavicular irradiation neglecting the thyroid in terms of dose protection were included from 01/2020 to 04/2021. An IMRT or VMAT technique was used in 23 and 20 patients, respectively. Replanning aimed for a thyroid Dmean of 10 Gy. IMRT plans still exceeding 10 Gy were converted into VMAT plans. Fisher's sign test compared original and revised plans and the hypothyroidism risk was calculated. RESULTS Initial radiotherapy plans had a thyroid Dmean of 18.4 ± 7.9 Gy (IMRT: 20.4 ± 8.8 Gy, VMAT: 16.2 ± 6.2 Gy). Replanning significantly reduced Dmean to 10.3 ± 4.5 Gy (-44%) overall (IMRT: -50%, VMAT: -35%), with 56% achieving ≤ 10 Gy (IMRT: 33.3%, VMAT: 61%). Furthermore, an IMRT to VMAT conversion yielded a thyroid Dmean of 9.2 ± 3.5 Gy, with 74.4% of patients ≤ 10 Gy, albeit at the cost of higher doses to the contralateral breast. Clinical and planning target volume (CTV/PTV) coverage remained uncompromised. The calculated hypothyroidism risk significantly decreased from 24.5% to 13.3% (Dmean = 10 Gy) or 16.3% (Dmean = 13.5 Gy). CONCLUSION Implementing a thyroid organ at risk (OAR) constraint Dmean of 13.5 Gy was feasible in 88% of patients without compromising other OARs and CTV/PTV coverage, and resulted in a 33-46% reduction of the hypothyroidism risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Clivio
- Zentrum für Radiotherapie Rüti Zürich-Ost-Linth AG, Rüti, ZH, Switzerland
| | - Daniel R Zwahlen
- Zentrum für Radiotherapie Rüti Zürich-Ost-Linth AG, Rüti, ZH, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Sonja Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Cezarina Negreanu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Enrico Barletta
- Zentrum für Radiotherapie Rüti Zürich-Ost-Linth AG, Rüti, ZH, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Helmut Haerle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Elena Hofmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Oehler
- Zentrum für Radiotherapie Rüti Zürich-Ost-Linth AG, Rüti, ZH, Switzerland.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cutter DJ, Aleman BMP. Translating Between Radiation Dose and Late Toxicity for Lymphoma Survivors: Implications on Toxicity Counseling and Survivorship. Semin Radiat Oncol 2025; 35:27-39. [PMID: 39672639 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2024]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is an important modality in the modern management of lymphoma. RT has long been recognized as a cause of late toxicity in lymphoma survivors, including serious morbidity and increased mortality from second cancers and cardiovascular disease. Many studies have quantified the relationships between radiation dose to normal tissues and the risk of late toxicities. These relationships offer the opportunity to estimate future risks for patients on an individual basis. This knowledge has the potential to effect up-front management decisions regarding the use of RT, optimize radiotherapy planning for treatment, guide the evolution of future RT technologies and identify past and future patients whose risk of late toxicity is sufficient to warrant specific screening and surveillance strategies. Despite these potential applications the challenges around translating between radiation dose and accurate predictions of late toxicities are many and substantial. This article summarizes the current state of knowledge, the inherent challenges and possible directions for future research to address this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Cutter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vennarini S, Colombo F, Filippi AR, Orlandi E. Proton therapy for pediatric malignancies: Indications and challenges focusing on the oncological landscape. TUMORI JOURNAL 2024; 110:416-421. [PMID: 39407409 DOI: 10.1177/03008916241287016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
Advances in therapeutic techniques and multimodal approaches have significantly improved the success rates of treatment for pediatric malignancies, with cure rates now close to 80%. This has led to an increase in long-term survival, with 0.10-0.15% of the general population being survivors of childhood cancer. In Italy, cancer registry data suggest that 75% of treated children become long-term survivors. However, these survivors face significant risks of late adverse events, including chronic diseases and severe conditions, highlighting the need for specialized follow-up care.Radiotherapy, a cornerstone of pediatric cancer treatment, contributes to late toxicities due to the susceptibility of growing tissues. Proton therapy offers advantages in reducing treatment-related toxicity, reducing the risk of secondary cancers, and allowing dose escalation for radioresistant tumors. Comparative studies suggest that proton therapy is superior in sparing healthy tissues and reducing long-term toxicities.Despite these benefits, challenges such as the high cost, limited proton therapy centers, and the need for clinical trials hinder the widespread adoption of proton therapy. Efforts to centralize care in high-ranking centers and ensure equitable access to proton therapy are crucial. In Italy, pediatric solid tumors are now eligible for proton therapy under national health policies, ensuring free access for all children.Dedicated proton therapy centers must provide comprehensive care involving multidisciplinary teams and supportive environments for pediatric patients and their families. Addressing current limitations and enhancing care environments are essential for improving outcomes for pediatric oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Vennarini
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Colombo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea R Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sadeghi H, Seif F, Farahani EH, Khanmohammadi S, Nahidinezhad S. Utilizing patient data: A tutorial on predicting second cancer with machine learning models. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e70231. [PMID: 39300964 PMCID: PMC11413496 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 08/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The article explores the potential risk of secondary cancer (SC) due to radiation therapy (RT) and highlights the necessity for new modeling techniques to mitigate this risk. METHODS By employing machine learning (ML) models, specifically decision trees, in the research process, a practical framework is established for forecasting the occurrence of SC using patient data. RESULTS & DISCUSSION This framework aids in categorizing patients into high-risk or low-risk groups, thereby enabling personalized treatment plans and interventions. The paper also underscores the many factors that contribute to the likelihood of SC, such as radiation dosage, patient age, and genetic predisposition, while emphasizing the limitations of current models in encompassing all relevant parameters. These limitations arise from the non-linear dependencies between variables and the failure to consider factors such as genetics, hormones, lifestyle, radiation from secondary particles, and imaging dosage. To instruct and assess ML models for predicting the occurrence of SC based on patient data, the paper utilizes a dataset consisting of instances and attributes. CONCLUSION The practical implications of this research lie in enhancing our understanding and prediction of SC following RT, facilitating personalized treatment approaches, and establishing a framework for leveraging patient data within the realm of ML models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Sadeghi
- Department of Physics, Faculty of SciencesArak UniversityArakIran
| | - Fatemeh Seif
- Department of Radiotherapy and Medical PhysicsArak University of Medical Sciences & Khansari HospitalArakIran
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Milano MT, Marks LB, Olch AJ, Yorke ED, Jackson A, Bentzen SM, Constine LS. Comparison of Risks of Late Effects From Radiation Therapy in Children Versus Adults: Insights From the QUANTEC, HyTEC, and PENTEC Efforts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:387-400. [PMID: 38069917 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) seeks to refine quantitative radiation dose-volume relationships for normal-tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) in survivors of pediatric cancer. This article summarizes the evolution of PENTEC and compares it with similar adult-focused efforts (eg, Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic [QUANTEC] and Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic [HyTEC]) with respect to content, oversight, support, scope, and methodology of literature review. It then summarizes key organ-specific findings from PENTEC in an attempt to compare NTCP estimates in children versus adults. In brief, select normal-tissue risks within developing organs and tissues (eg, maldevelopment of musculoskeletal tissue, teeth, breasts, and reproductive organs) are primarily relevant only in children. For some organs and tissues, children appear to have similar (eg, brain for necrosis, optic apparatus, parotid gland, liver), greater (eg, brain for neurocognition, cerebrovascular, breast for lactation), less (ovary), or perhaps slightly less (eg, lung) risks of toxicity versus adults. Similarly, even within the broad pediatric age range (including adolescence), for some endpoints, younger children have greater (eg, hearing and brain for neurocognition) or lesser (eg, ovary, thyroid) risks of radiation-associated toxicities. NTCP comparisons in adults versus children are often confounded by marked differences in treatment paradigms that expose normal tissues to radiation (ie, cancer types, prescribed radiation therapy dose and fields, and chemotherapy agents used). To add to the complexity, it is unclear if age is best analyzed as a continuous variable versus with age groupings (eg, infants, young children, adolescents, young adults, middle-aged adults, older adults). Further work is needed to better understand the complex manner in which age and developmental status affect risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles/Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ellen D Yorke
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Constine LS, Marks LB, Milano MT, Ronckers CM, Jackson A, Hudson MM, Marcus KJ, Hodgson DC, Hua CH, Howell RM, Marples B, Yorke E, Olch A, Bentzen SM. A User's Guide and Summary of Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC): Radiation Dose-Volume Response for Adverse Effects After Childhood Cancer Therapy and Future Directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:321-337. [PMID: 37999712 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) is an international multidisciplinary effort that aims to summarize normal-tissue toxicity risks based on published dose-volume data from studies of children and adolescents treated with radiation therapy (RT) for cancer. With recognition that children are uniquely vulnerable to treatment-related toxic effects, our mission and challenge was to assemble our group of physicians (radiation and pediatric oncologists, subspecialists), physicists with clinical and modeling expertise, epidemiologists, and other scientists to develop evidence-based radiation dosimetric guidelines, as affected by developmental status and other factors (eg, other cancer therapies and host factors). These quantitative toxicity risk estimates could serve to inform RT planning and thereby improve outcomes. Tandem goals included the description of relevant medical physics issues specific to pediatric RT and the proposal of dose-volume outcome reporting standards to inform future studies. We created 19 organ-specific task forces and methodology to unravel the wealth of data from heterogeneous published studies. This report provides a high-level summary of PENTEC's genesis, methods, key findings, and associated concepts that affected our work and an explanation of how our findings may be interpreted and applied in the clinic. We acknowledge our predecessors in these efforts, and we pay homage to the children whose lives informed us and to future generations who we hope will benefit from this additional step in our path forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis S Constine
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and; Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, New York.
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology (EpiKiK) and the German Childhood Cancer Registry (DKKR), Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Survivorship, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Karen J Marcus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber/ Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David C Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Arthur Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California and Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Soren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hua CH, Bentzen SM, Li Y, Milano MT, Rancati T, Marks LB, Constine LS, Yorke ED, Jackson A. Improving Pediatric Normal Tissue Radiation Dose-Response Modeling in Children With Cancer: A PENTEC Initiative. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:369-386. [PMID: 38276939 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The development of normal tissue radiation dose-response models for children with cancer has been challenged by many factors, including small sample sizes; the long length of follow-up needed to observe some toxicities; the continuing occurrence of events beyond the time of assessment; the often complex relationship between age at treatment, normal tissue developmental dynamics, and age at assessment; and the need to use retrospective dosimetry. Meta-analyses of published pediatric outcome studies face additional obstacles of incomplete reporting of critical dosimetric, clinical, and statistical information. This report describes general methods used to address some of the pediatric modeling issues. It highlights previous single- and multi-institutional pediatric dose-response studies and summarizes how each PENTEC taskforce addressed the challenges and limitations of the reviewed publications in constructing, when possible, organ-specific dose-effect models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yimei Li
- Department of Biostatics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Data Science Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Ellen D Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Journy N, Bolle S, Brualla L, Dumas A, Fresneau B, Haddy N, Haghdoost S, Haustermans K, Jackson A, Karabegovic S, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Thariat J, Wette MR, Botzenhardt S, De Wit I, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Christiaens M, Høyer M, Isebaert S, Jacobs S, Henriksen LT, Maduro JH, Ronckers C, Steinmeier T, Uyttebroeck A, Van Beek K, Walsh L, Thierry-Chef I, Timmermann B. Assessing late outcomes of advances in radiotherapy for paediatric cancers: Study protocol of the "HARMONIC-RT" European registry (NCT 04746729). Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109972. [PMID: 37922994 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Neige Journy
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Laboratory of "Radiation Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Survivorship", Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Department of Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Lorenzo Brualla
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Agnès Dumas
- Inserm, Aix Marseille University, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM (Economic and Social Sciences of Health and Medical Information Processing), Marseille, France
| | - Brice Fresneau
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Laboratory of "Radiation Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Survivorship", Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Paediatric Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Laboratory of "Radiation Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Survivorship", Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Siamak Haghdoost
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Caen Normandy, Advanced Resource Center for HADrontherapy in Europe (ARCHADE), 14000 Caen, France
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Angela Jackson
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France; National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Sanja Karabegovic
- Department of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus 8200, Denmark
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Centre Régional Francois Baclesse, Avenue Du General Harris 3, Caen Cedex 5 14076, France; Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Martina Roxanne Wette
- Department of Particle Therapy - University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Suzan Botzenhardt
- Department of Particle Therapy - University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Inge De Wit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- National Institute for Medical Research (INSERM) U1018 Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Laboratory of "Radiation Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Survivorship", Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Centre Régional Francois Baclesse, Avenue Du General Harris 3, Caen Cedex 5 14076, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Rue Larrey 4, Angers 49 000, France
| | - Melissa Christiaens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Morten Høyer
- Aarhus University (AU), Nordre Ringgade 1, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Sandra Jacobs
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium; Department of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Louise Tram Henriksen
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus 8200, Denmark
| | - John H Maduro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Cecile Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Theresa Steinmeier
- Department of Particle Therapy - University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| | - Anne Uyttebroeck
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Karen Van Beek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Linda Walsh
- Department of Physics, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Beate Timmermann
- University Hospital Essen (UK Essen), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy - University Hospital Essen, West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vassantachart A, Olch AJ, Jones M, Marques C, Ronckers C, Constine LS, Maduro JH, de Boer C, Wong K. A comprehensive review of 30 years of pediatric clinical trial radiotherapy dose constraints. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30270. [PMID: 36880707 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy normal tissue dose constraints are critical when treating pediatric patients. However, there is limited evidence supporting proposed constraints, which has led to variations in constraints over the years. In this study, we identify these variations in dose constraints within pediatric trials both in the United States and in Europe used in the past 30 years. PROCEDURE All pediatric trials from the Children's Oncology Group website were queried from inception until January 2022 and a sampling of European studies was included. Dose constraints were identified and built into an organ-based interactive web application with filters to display data by organs at risk (OAR), protocol, start date, dose, volume, and fractionation scheme. Dose constraints were evaluated for consistency over time and compared between pediatric US and European trials RESULTS: One hundred five closed trials were included-93 US trials and 12 European trials. Thirty-eight separate OAR were found with high-dose constraint variability. Across all trials, nine organs had greater than 10 different constraints (median 16, range 11-26), including serial organs. When comparing US versus European dose tolerances, the United States constraints were higher for seven OAR, lower for one, and identical for five. No OAR had constraints change systematically over the last 30 years. CONCLUSION Review of pediatric dose-volume constraints in clinical trials showed substantial variability for all OAR. Continued efforts focused on standardization of OAR dose constraints and risk profiles are essential to increase consistency of protocol outcomes and ultimately to reduce radiation toxicities in the pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Vassantachart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marjorie Jones
- USC/CHLA Summer Oncology, Research Fellowship, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| | - Christophe Marques
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Gayle and Tom Benson Cancer Center, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Cécile Ronckers
- Princess Máxima, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Louis S Constine
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - John H Maduro
- Princess Máxima, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte de Boer
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with inborn errors of immunity. Bone Marrow Transplant 2023; 58:273-281. [PMID: 36456809 PMCID: PMC10005930 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01883-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Graft failure (GF) remains a serious issue of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Second HSCT is the only salvage therapy for GF. There are no uniform strategies for the second HSCTs and limited data are available on the second HSCT outcomes. 48 patients with various IEI received second allogeneic HSCT from 2013 to 2020. Different conditioning regimens were used, divided into two main groups: containing myeloablative doses of busulfan/treosulfan (n = 19) and lymphoid irradiation 2-6 Gy (n = 22). Irradiation-containing conditioning was predominantly used in suspected immune-mediated rejection of the first graft. Matched unrelated donor was used in 28 patients, mismatched related in 18, and matched related in 1. 35 patients received TCRαβ/CD19 graft depletion. The median follow-up time was 2.4 years post-HSCT. One patient died at conditioning. The OS was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41-0.85) after busulfan/treosulfan and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.48-0.88) after irradiation-based conditioning, p = 0.66. Active infection at HSCT significantly influenced OS: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.17-0.69) versus 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.88) without infection, p = 0.004. The cumulative incidence of GF was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.29). To conclude, an individualized approach is required for the second HSCT in IEI. Low-dose lymphoid irradiation in suspected immune-mediated GF may be a feasible option.
Collapse
|
11
|
Beijer JGM, Kok JL, Janssens GO, Streefkerk N, de Vries ACH, Slagter C, Maduro JH, Kroon PS, Grootenhuis MA, van Dulmen‐den Broeder E, Loonen JJ, Wendling M, Tissing WJE, van der Pal HJ, Louwerens M, Bel A, den Hartogh J, van der Heiden‐van der Loo M, Kremer LCM, Teepen JC, Ronckers CM. Adverse late health outcomes among children treated with 3D radiotherapy techniques: Study design of the Dutch pediatric 3D-RT study. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2023; 6:e1620. [PMID: 36715495 PMCID: PMC9939987 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse late health outcomes after multimodal treatment for pediatric cancer are diverse and of prime interest. Currently available evidence and survivorship care guidelines are largely based on studies addressing side-effects of two dimensional planned radiotherapy. AIMS The Dutch pediatric 3D-planned radiotherapy (3D-RT) study aims to gain insight in the long-term health outcomes among children who had radiotherapy in the 3D era. Here, we describe the study design, data-collection methods, and baseline cohort characteristics. METHODS AND RESULTS The 3D-RT study represents an expansion of the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor study (DCCSS) LATER cohort, including pediatric cancer patients diagnosed during 2000-2012, who survived at least 5 years after initial diagnosis and 2 years post external beam radiotherapy. Individual cancer treatment parameters were obtained from medical files. A national infrastructure for uniform collection and archival of digital radiotherapy files (Computed Tomography [CT]-scans, delineations, plan, and dose files) was established. Health outcome information, including subsequent tumors, originated from medical records at the LATER outpatient clinics, and national registry-linkage. With a median follow-up of 10.9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.9-14.3) years after childhood cancer diagnosis, 711 eligible survivors were identified. The most common cancer types were Hodgkin lymphoma, medulloblastoma, and nephroblastoma. Most survivors received radiotherapy directed to the head/cranium only, the craniospinal axis, or the abdominopelvic region. CONCLUSION The 3D-RT study will provide knowledge on the risk of adverse late health outcomes and radiation-associated dose-effect relationships. This information is valuable to guide follow-up care of childhood cancer survivors and to refine future treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Judith L. Kok
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Geert O. Janssens
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Nina Streefkerk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Andrica C. H. de Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric OncologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Cleo Slagter
- Department of Radiation OncologyErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - John H. Maduro
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Petra S. Kroon
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | | | - Eline van Dulmen‐den Broeder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/HematologyAmsterdam University Medical Center/Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline J. Loonen
- Department of HematologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Markus Wendling
- Department of Radiation OncologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Wim J. E. Tissing
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Beatrix Children's HospitalUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Marloes Louwerens
- Department of Internal MedicineLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Arjan Bel
- Department of Radiation OncologyAmsterdam University Medical Center/University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jaap den Hartogh
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Dutch Childhood Cancer Parent OrganizationNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | | | - Leontien C. M. Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's HospitalAmsterdam University Medical Center/University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's HospitalUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Jop C. Teepen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pharmacological protection of the thyroid gland against radiation damage from radioactive iodine labeled compounds in children: a systematic review. Clin Transl Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-022-00529-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
There is currently no consensus on which protective strategy is most effective to prevent I-131 uptake in the thyroid during medical interventions in children. We aimed to collect the best available evidence to determine which pharmacological intervention is most effective in protecting the thyroid gland from damage by radioactive iodine (RAI).
Methods
Literature searches were performed using PubMed, Embase, OLDMEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Only original studies were included (1950–2022). Studies comparing pharmacological prevention of the thyroid against RAI uptake or occurrence of hypothyroidism, thyroid nodule or thyroid cancer were included. Included studies were graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation considerations. Pharmacological interventions were compared for effectiveness on reduction of thyroidal intake or relevant clinical thyroidal outcomes.
Results
Forty studies were included. Quality of included studies was low and many different outcome variables were used, making meta-analysis impossible. In 81% of studies, the pharmacological intervention could not prevent RAI uptake or thyroid damage. The administration of potassium iodide (KI) 1 h before exposure to RAI seemed most effective to reduce thyroidal uptake, however, hypothyroidism was reported in up to 64% as well as several cases of thyroid carcinoma. The combination of KI, thyroxine and thiamazole reduced RAI uptake and occurrence of hypothyroidism; yet, after follow-up of 9 years, still 50% of patients developed hypothyroidism. KI with potassium perchlorate showed hypothyroidism to occur in up to 12% of patients after short follow-up time.
Conclusions
The lack of well-designed studies impairs making strong recommendations on the optimal way to prevent thyroid damage when using radioactive coupled ligands for medical interventions. To improve the protection of the thyroid against radiation damage by I-131, well-designed randomized clinical trials with sufficient follow-up time, comparing new protective strategies’ effects on valid and well-defined thyroid outcomes are needed.
Collapse
|
13
|
Dose-Volume Constraints fOr oRganS At risk In Radiotherapy (CORSAIR): An "All-in-One" Multicenter-Multidisciplinary Practical Summary. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:7021-7050. [PMID: 36290829 PMCID: PMC9600677 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safe use of radiotherapy (RT) requires compliance with dose/volume constraints (DVCs) for organs at risk (OaRs). However, the available recommendations are sometimes conflicting and scattered across a number of different documents. Therefore, the aim of this work is to provide, in a single document, practical indications on DVCs for OaRs in external beam RT available in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multidisciplinary team collected bibliographic information on the anatomical definition of OaRs, on the imaging methods needed for their definition, and on DVCs in general and in specific settings (curative RT of Hodgkin's lymphomas, postoperative RT of breast tumors, curative RT of pediatric cancers, stereotactic ablative RT of ventricular arrythmia). The information provided in terms of DVCs was graded based on levels of evidence. RESULTS Over 650 papers/documents/websites were examined. The search results, together with the levels of evidence, are presented in tabular form. CONCLUSIONS A working tool, based on collected guidelines on DVCs in different settings, is provided to help in daily clinical practice of RT departments. This could be a first step for further optimizations.
Collapse
|
14
|
Keikhaei B, Bahadoram M, Keikha A, Bahadoram S, Hassanzadeh S, Mahmoudian-Sani MR. Late side effects of cancer treatment in childhood cancer survivors. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2022:10781552221087611. [PMID: 35289220 DOI: 10.1177/10781552221087611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Childhood cancers are usually treated with chemotherapy and radiation. Therefore, understanding the late side effects of such treatments is important to improve the quality of life in childhood cancer survivors. The present study aimed to investigate the late complications of treatments in childhood cancer survivors. METHODS This study is a retrospective descriptive study. A total number of 93 cases were enrolled in this study. These cases had a history of childhood cancer documented in their medical records at the Shafa Hospital, Ahvaz, Iran. The age range was 5.9-21.3 years and included 62 males and 31 female patients. RESULTS Many of the patients at this hospital with childhood cancer had experienced chemotherapy side effects as well as late effects of cancer therapy. Hypothyroidism is a late complication of therapy in thoracic cancers and head/neck tumors with relative frequencies of 23.1% and 12.5%, respectively. Scoliosis was observed in the patients undergoing the ABVD + COPP and 8/1 regimens with relative frequencies of 4% and 50%, respectively. Lower growth percentiles were also late side effects of cancer therapy. The highest relative frequency of growth retardation was observed in the <5 age group (46.7%). Restrictive lung changes had an overall relative frequency of 6.5% in male patients with all types of tumors. Sensorineural hearing loss was observed in patients with leukemia and Hodgkin lymphoma with relative frequencies of 8.7% and 24.0, respectively. CONCLUSION The occurrence of most side effects could be decreased through early diagnosis, dose adjustment of some drugs, and preventative measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bijan Keikhaei
- Thalassemia and Hemoglobinopathy Research Center, Health Research Institute, 48407Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Bahadoram
- Thalassemia and Hemoglobinopathy Research Center, Health Research Institute, 48407Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Amin Keikha
- Thalassemia and Hemoglobinopathy Research Center, Health Research Institute, 48407Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Sara Bahadoram
- Thalassemia and Hemoglobinopathy Research Center, Health Research Institute, 48407Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Shakiba Hassanzadeh
- Thalassemia and Hemoglobinopathy Research Center, Health Research Institute, 48407Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Mohammad-Reza Mahmoudian-Sani
- Thalassemia and Hemoglobinopathy Research Center, Health Research Institute, 48407Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lugat A, Drui D, Baron S, Thebaud E, Supiot S, Jouglar E, Doré M. Effets secondaires endocriniens de la radiothérapie : diagnostic, prévention et traitements. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:1078-1089. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Dell'Oro M, Wilson P, Short M, Hua CH, Merchant TE, Bezak E. Normal tissue complication probability modeling to guide individual treatment planning in pediatric cranial proton and photon radiotherapy. Med Phys 2021; 49:742-755. [PMID: 34796509 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy (PT) is broadly accepted as the gold standard of care for pediatric patients with cranial cancer. The superior dose distribution of PT compared to photon radiotherapy reduces normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for organs at risk. As NTCPs for pediatric organs are not well understood, clinics generally base radiation response on adult data. However, there is evidence that radiation response strongly depends on the age and even sex of a patient. Furthermore, questions surround the influence of individual intrinsic radiosensitivity (α/β ratio) on pediatric NTCP. While the clinical pediatric NTCP data is scarce, radiobiological modeling and sensitivity analyses can be used to investigate the NTCP trends and its dependence on individual modeling parameters. The purpose of this study was to perform sensitivity analyses of NTCP models to ascertain the dependence of radiosensitivity, sex, and age of a child and predict cranial side-effects following intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS Previously, six sex-matched pediatric cranial datasets (5, 9, and 13 years old) were planned in Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (13.7). Up to 108 scanning beam IMPT plans and 108 IMRT plans were retrospectively optimized for a range of simulated target volumes and locations. In this work, dose-volume histograms were extracted and imported into BioSuite Software for radiobiological modeling. Relative-Seriality and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models were used to calculate NTCP values for toxicity endpoints, where TD50, (based on reported adult clinical data) was varied to simulate sex dependence of NTCP. Plausible parameter ranges, based on published literature for adults, were used in modeling. In addition to sensitivity analyses, a 20% difference in TD50 was used to represent the radiosensitivity between the sexes (with females considered more radiosensitive) for ease of data comparison as a function of parameters such as α/β ratio. RESULTS IMPT plans resulted in lower NTCP compared to IMRT across all models (p < 0.0001). For medulloblastoma treatment, the risk of brainstem necrosis (> 10%) and cochlea tinnitus (> 20%) among females could potentially be underestimated considering a lower TD50 value for females. Sensitivity analyses show that the difference in NTCP between sexes was significant (p < 0.0001). Similarly, both brainstem necrosis and cochlea tinnitus NTCP varied significantly (p < 0.0001) across tested α/β as a function of TD50 values (assumption being that TD50 values are 20% lower in females). If the true α/β of these pediatric tissues is higher than expected (α/β ∼ 3), the risk of tinnitus for IMRT can significantly increase (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Due to the scarcity of pediatric NTCP data available, sensitivity analyses were performed using plausible ranges based on published adult data. In the clinical scenario where, if female pediatric patients were 20% more radiosensitive (lower TD50 value), they could be up to twice as likely to experience side-effects of brainstem necrosis and cochlea tinnitus compared to males, highlighting the need for considering the sex in NTCP models. Based on our sensitivity analyses, age and sex of a pediatric patient could significantly affect the resultant NTCP from cranial radiotherapy, especially at higher α/β values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.,UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|