Transarterial Chemoembolization With Drug-Eluting Beads Versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Outcomes From a Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2 Trial (the TRENDY Trial)

Emerging evidence-based role for external-beam radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

The primary curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma are resection or liver transplantation. For patients requiring downstaging or who are unresectable at presentation, the landscape of local treatment options has vastly changed over the past decades. This change is partly due to the paucity of high-level evidence to guide the selection of liver-directed therapies, where physician preference and treatment patterns have historically resulted in relegating external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to a secondary option in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in cases where arterially directed therapies or thermal ablations were not possible. However, technology advancements have substantially improved the ability to treat liver malignancies with high doses of radiation therapy and to minimise doses to uninvolved hepatic parenchyma and other nearby organs. These advancements have enabled safe treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with EBRT, with low risk of toxicity. Recent randomised trials support the role of EBRT in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma from early to advanced stages. These trials identified that EBRT improved several key patient-centred outcomes, including overall survival when using stereotactic body radiotherapy and sorafenib compared with sorafenib alone in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, recurrence-free survival with the use of adjuvant EBRT in select patients after hepatocellular carcinoma resection, and quality of life for patients with painful hepatocellular carcinoma masses treated with palliative EBRT. With emerging high-quality evidence, hepatocellular carcinoma therapeutic guidelines should include the growing role of EBRT in improving the quality and quantity of life for patients with liver cancer.

Advances in radiation therapy for HCC: Integration with liver-directed treatments

HCC is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality with increasing incidence worldwide. Historically, treatment for early disease includes liver transplantation, surgical resection, and/or other local therapies, such as thermal ablation. As a result of technical advances and high-quality prospective data, the use of definitive external beam radiotherapy with ablative doses has emerged. Intermediate-stage disease has been generally addressed with arterially directed therapies (eg, chemoembolization or radioembolization) and external beam radiotherapy, while advanced stages have been addressed by systemic therapy or best supportive care. The role of each local/locoregional therapy has rapidly evolved in the context of novel pharmacotherapies, including immunotherapies and antiangiogenic agents. The combinations, indications, and timing of treatments vary widely among specialties and geographies. Here, we aim to synthesize the best quality evidence available regarding the efficacy and safety of different liver-directed modalities, with a focus on recent prospective clinical data of external beam radiotherapy within the context of other available liver-directed therapies across Barcelona Liver Classification (BCLC) stages.

Final Results of a Multicenter Prospective Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Previously Untreated Solitary Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma (The STRSPH Study)

PURPOSE

To report final results of a prospective study of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with previously untreated solitary primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trial recruited patients with HCC who were unsuitable for, or refused, surgery and radiofrequency ablation, with 3-year overall survival rates as the primary endpoint and survival outcomes and adverse events as secondary endpoints. The prescribed SBRT dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The final data were analyzed in November 2022.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2018, 36 patients (median age, 73.5 years) were registered; enrollment was closed before full recruitment due to slow accrual. Overall, 34 patients were analyzed for efficacy evaluation after excluding 2 patients. The median tumor size was 2.3 cm. The median follow-up times for all patients and for survivors were 49 and 56 months, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 82% (95% confidence interval, 65%-92%). The 3-year local control rate was 93% (95% confidence interval, 76%-98%). Grade 3 or higher SBRT-related nonlaboratory toxicities were observed in 4 patients (11%). No grade 5 adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Final results of this phase 2 trial suggest the efficacy and safety of SBRT for newly diagnosed early-stage HCC that is unfit for other local therapies. Although this study was underpowered by the small number of registrations, the excellent results indicate that SBRT may be an alternative option for the management of early-stage HCC.

Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy for Liver Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines

PURPOSE

Liver metastases are a significant clinical challenge in cancer management, often representing a stage of disease in which curative treatment is still possible. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising modality for treating these metastases, offering a noninvasive approach with potential for high efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of SBRT in treating liver metastases, and practice recommendations are provided.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a thorough literature review, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, and included 33 studies with a total of 3101 patients and 4437 liver metastases.

RESULTS

The review revealed pooled local control rates at 1, 2, and 3 years of 85%, 75%, and 68% respectively, while overall survival rates were 79%, 54%, and 37%. Grade 3 and 4 side effects occurred in only 3% of patients. The review of the studies highlighted the importance of factors such as primary tumor histology, lesion characteristics, and radiation dose in predicting treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review supports the growing body of evidence that SBRT is an efficacious and safe treatment option for liver metastases. It underscores the need for careful patient selection and personalized treatment planning to optimize outcomes.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy with carbon ions as local ablative treatment in patients with primary liver cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer related death due to treatment resistance and late onset of symptoms (Rumgay in J Hepatol 77: 1598-1606, 2022). The role of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in treatment of unresectable liver cancer needs to be defined. The use of particle therapy such as carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) with high linear energy transfer (LET) could increase efficacy of EBRT while limiting the toxic effects of radiation on non-cancerous liver tissue. Promising effects of CIRT have been described in several studies during the past decades, mostly in Japan. To date, no standardized treatment protocol has been established and European data on CIRT for liver cancer is lacking. This retrospective analysis aims to investigate efficacy and safety of hypofractionated CIRT compared to photon-based stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) in primary liver cancer.

METHOD

Thirty-six (n = 36) and twenty (n = 20) patients with primary malignant liver tumors were treated with hypofractionated CIRT (4 fractions) and photon-based SBRT, respectively, between 2011 and 2022 and were retrospectively evaluated for survival, local control, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Two-year local control rate after CIRT was 92.3%. Compared to photon- based SBRT, CIRT scores with a significantly longer median distant progression free survival (3.1 versus 0.9 years). In a matched pair comparison of the two treatment regimens, the CIRT cohort demonstrated both longer 2-year overall survival (100% versus 59.6%) and longer 2-year distant PFS (75.7% versus 22.9%). No significant impairment of liver function was observed in either cohort.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, patients who received CIRT presented excellent local tumor control and had better oncologic outcomes than patients who received photon-based SBRT. SBRT with carbon ions is a promising local ablative treatment option that needs further investigation in large prospective trials.

Gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis of 81 studies and 9495 patients

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a widely used treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combining targeted chemotherapy and embolization. While effective, TACE can be associated with significant gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, impacting a patient's quality of life.

Objectives

Quantify the prevalence of key GI complications (diarrhea, nausea, GI toxicity, abdominal pain) following TACE.

Design

Systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on studies that reported side effects of TACE. Studies not involving cTACE or drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), non-HCC studies, meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and inaccessible publications were excluded.

Data sources and methods

A PubMed search for clinical and randomized trials was conducted. Extracted data included study identifiers, demographics, TACE details, and GI side effect prevalences. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed study quality and bias.

Results

The analysis included data from 81 studies with 121 individual study arms and 9495 patients. Diarrhea was reported in 38 studies, with a mean prevalence of 23.46% (2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.39-28.544) and a weighted prevalence of 23.5%. Nausea was most frequently reported, mentioned in 67 studies, with a mean prevalence of 34.66% (2.4; 95% CI: 29.89-39.44) and a weighted prevalence of 32.5%. Abdominal pain was reported in 59 studies, with the highest mean prevalence of 48.07% (2.9; 95% CI: 42.20-53.93) and a weighted prevalence of 46.1%. GI toxicity was reported in 32 studies, with a mean prevalence of 8.85% (1.4; 95% CI: 5.99-11.70) and a weighted prevalence of 9.9%. DEB-TACE generally led to slightly higher rates of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and GI toxicity compared to conventional TACE. The type of chemotherapy agent influenced prevalence of GI-side effects, with high prevalences observed for agents such as zinostatin and cisplatin.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis synthesizes current evidence on managing GI side effects in TACE. Standardizing reporting and developing effective management strategies are crucial to improving patient outcomes.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of external-beam radiation versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

External-beam radiation (EBRT) is a noninvasive therapeutic alternative to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials to assess the clinical efficacy of EBRT versus TACE for HCC as either a definitive monotherapy or as a bridge to transplantation/surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to include prospective randomized trials comparing EBRT versus TACE. Data was analyzed with random and fixed-effects models. The inconsistency index (I2) was chosen to assess heterogeneity. Three publications were included with a total of 142 patients. Outcomes included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and occurrences of grade ≥3 toxicity. Comparisons are reported as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

There were three randomized trials that met inclusion criteria. The EBRT was delivered in three to 15 fractions with a total dose between 30 and 75 gray(Gy). EBRT was associated with significantly improved LC (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.34; I2 = 0%) and PFS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.60; I2, 0%) compared with TACE. There was no significant difference between EBRT and TACE in OS (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.51-1.22; I2 = 0%) or grade ≥3 toxicity (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.31-2.37; I2 = 57%). None of the analyses had statistically significant heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TACE, EBRT yields superior LC and PFS without providing a survival benefit in early and intermediate stage HCC. Additional larger prospective randomized controlled trials should be conducted to further investigate differences in clinical outcomes amongst patients with more advanced disease.

External Beam Radiation therapy After Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Treatment of Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone with those of TACE combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multicenter randomized study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2017 to 2022, 74 HCC patients with tumors confined to the liver without vascular invasion were treated with either TACE only (TACE group, 39 patients) or TACE combined with EBRT (TACE + EBRT group, 35 patients). The primary outcome measured was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local tumor control, and the assessment of treatment-related toxicity.

RESULTS

Due to slow accrual, the trial was closed prematurely after enrolling 74 patients. All patients received 2 cycles of TACE before randomization. The TACE and TACE + EBRT groups showed comparable patient and tumor characteristics. The TACE group underwent a median of 3 TACE cycles, and the TACE + EBRT group received 2 cycles of TACE, and a median of 5500 cGy in 15 fractions. For the TACE group, the median local control (LC) duration was 13.1 months, whereas for the TACE + EBRT group, the median LC was not achieved (P < .001). The PFS was recorded at 11.6 months in the TACE group compared with 15.4 months in the TACE + EBRT group (P = .072). The median OS reached 36.8 months for the TACE group and extended to 47.1 months for the TACE + EBRT group (P = .654). The incidence of toxicity was comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of patients enrolled in this clinical trial did not meet expectations. TACE combined with EBRT was shown to be more effective than TACE alone in improving LC without increasing toxicity, whereas PFS and OS were slightly improved. TACE + EBRT can be used as a standard treatment option for patients with inoperable but confined intrahepatic HCC.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Sorafenib Alone in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The NRG Oncology/RTOG 1112 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Most patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recur within the liver following systemic therapy.

Objective

To determine whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves outcomes in patients with locally advanced HCC compared with sorafenib alone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial randomized patients with HCC 1:1 to sorafenib or SBRT followed by sorafenib, stratified by performance status, liver function, degree of metastases, and macrovascular invasion. Eligible patients had HCC unsuitable for or refractory to standard local-regional therapies and were candidates for first-line systemic therapy. Data were collected from April 2013 to March 2021, and data were analyzed from July 2022 to August 2023.

Intervention

Personalized SBRT, 27.5 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, and quality of life.

Results

Of 193 patients randomized, 177 were eligible. Accrual was stopped early due to a change in standard-of-care systemic therapy. Of 177 included patients, 150 (84.7%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years. Macrovascular invasion was seen in 131 (74.0%). As of July 1, 2022, the median OS was 12.3 months (90% CI, 10.6-14.3) with sorafenib vs 15.8 months (90% CI, 11.4-19.2) following SBRT and sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 90% CI, 0.59-1.01; 1-sided P = .06). Adjusting for stratification factors, OS was improved with SBRT (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; 2-sided P = .04). Median PFS was improved from 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.3) with sorafenib to 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.9) with SBRT and sorafenib (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75; 2-sided P < .001). Treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were seen in 37 of 88 (42%) and 39 of 83 (47%) of patients treated with sorafenib vs SBRT and sorafenib, respectively (P = .52). There were 2 treatment-related deaths in the sorafenib group (death not otherwise specified and liver failure) and 1 in the SBRT and sorafenib group (lung infection). At 6 months, improved quality of life was seen in 2 of 20 (10%) and 6 of 17 (35%) of patients treated with sorafenib and SBRT and sorafenib, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, among patients with locally advanced HCC, SBRT was associated with a clinically important but not statistically significant improved overall survival compared with sorafenib alone.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01730937.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which provides excellent local control (LC) and prolongs overall survival (OS). However, in current guidelines, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been proposed as a key treatment option for patients with early- and intermediate-stage HCC, whereas SBRT is not. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies using the propensity score (PS) to compare the outcomes of SBRT and TACE for HCC in a balanced manner. We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials and studies comparing SBRT and TACE using PS analysis. The hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and LC were pooled. The heterogeneity between the data collected from these studies was also assessed. SBRT led to a comparable OS (HR: 0.83; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.52-1.34; p = 0.44) to TACE, and significantly improved LC (HR: 0.25; 95 % CI: 0.09-0.67; p = 0.006). Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the HR of OS and LC. Although there was no significant difference in the rate of grade 3 or higher toxicities between TACE and SBRT, or between studies, liver toxicity was identified as a common adverse event associated with both SBRT and TACE. Compared to TACE, SBRT showed a comparable OS and improved LC without serious toxicity. Therefore, SBRT should be considered an effective treatment option for various stages of HCC, depending on the tumor factors and pretreatment liver function.

Synchronized Contrast-Enhanced 4DCT Simulation for Target Volume Delineation in Abdominal SBRT

Background/Objectives: To present the technical aspects of contrast-enhanced 4DCT (ce4DCT) simulation for abdominal SBRT. Methods: Twenty-two patients underwent two sequential 4DCT scans: one baseline and one contrast-enhanced with personalized delay time (tdelay) calculated to capture the tumor in the desired contrast phase, based on diagnostic triple-phase CT. The internal target volume (ITV) was delineated on ten contrast phases, and a panel of three experts qualitatively evaluated tumor visibility. Aortic HU values were measured to refine the tdelay for subsequent patients. The commonly used approach of combining triple-phase CT with unenhanced 4DCT was simulated, and differences in target delineation were evaluated by volume, centroid shift, Dice and Jaccard indices, and mean distance agreement (MDA). The margins required to account for motion were calculated. Results: The ce4DCT acquisitions substantially improved tumor visibility over the entire breathing cycle in 20 patients, according to the experts' unanimous evaluation. The median contrast peak time was 54.5 s, and the washout plateau was observed at 70.3 s, with mean peak and plateau HU values of 292 ± 59 and 169 ± 25. The volumes from the commonly used procedure (ITV2) were significantly smaller than the ce4DCT volumes (ITV1) (p = 0.045). The median centroid shift was 4.7 mm. The ITV1-ITV2 overlap was 69% (Dice index), 53% (Jaccard index), and 2.89 mm (MDA), with the liver volumes showing significantly lower indices compared to the pancreatic volumes (p ≤ 0.011). The margins required to better encompass ITV1 were highly variable, with mean values ≥ 4 mm in all directions except for the left-right axis. Conclusions: The ce4DCT simulation was feasible, resulting in optimal tumor enhancement with minimal resource investment, while significantly mitigating uncertainties in SBRT planning by addressing poor visibility and respiratory motion. Triple-phase 3DCT with unenhanced 4DCT led to high variability in target delineation, making the isotropic margins ineffective.

Long-term outcomes of more than a decade treating patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose/Objectives

To evaluate if stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a durable effect on tumor control and can be delivered safely.

Materials/Methods

Patients included in this retrospective study have been treated at our institution from January 2008 to December 2022. Eligibility criteria were diagnosis of HCC, BCLC stage 0-A-B, non-cirrhotic liver or liver with cirrhosis Child-Pugh class A, and a maximum of three lesions with a cumulative diameter of ≤ 6 cm. Patients with relapses after surgery, thermal ablation or TACE or patients awaiting transplant were also candidates for SBRT. SBRT was delivered in 6 fractions of 8 or 9 Gy. The primary endpoint was local (target) control (LC). Secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity.

Results

A total of 52 patients received SBRT at our institution and 51 were included in this study. One patient objected and was excluded. Median follow-up was 2.1 years for LC and 2.3 years for OS. Median tumor size was 26 mm. LC rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 100 %, 95 % and 95 % respectively. Median TTP was 45.6 months. Median OS was 7.1 years. RR was 96 %. No patients in this study have experienced SBRT related CTC AE grade ≥ 3 toxicity.

Conclusion

SBRT resulted in excellent long-term local control rates and absence of severe toxicity in a group of HCC patients. The reported outcomes compare favorably with other local therapies. SBRT should be considered as one of the available local treatment options for HCC.

A Review of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Management of Gastrointestinal Malignancies

ABSTRACT

In this review, we explore the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and other advanced radiotherapy techniques in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies, which primarily involves primary and secondary liver cancers and pancreatic cancers. The review examines radiotherapy in both curative and palliative settings, emphasizing the evolution of SBRT and hypofractionation as alternatives to conventional radiotherapy. We review the recent literature evaluating radiotherapy in the management of unresectable, borderline resectable, and metastatic pancreatic cancer, highlighting recent advances in radiotherapy techniques that aim to improve local control, reduce toxicity, and increase resectability in appropriate patients. For primary liver cancers (hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma), SBRT has emerged as a potential noninvasive alternative to surgery, particularly in patients with unresectable tumors or those awaiting liver transplantation. The review also provides insights into ongoing clinical trials, comparative studies between SBRT and other local therapies such as radiofrequency ablation, and the use of radiotherapy in managing liver metastases from various primary cancers. Throughout, we emphasize limitations in the available literature and highlight areas of ongoing and future investigation.

The role of ALBI score in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced primary liver tumors: a pooled analysis of two prospective studies

Introduction

To evaluate the outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for locally advanced primary liver cancer.

Materials and methods

Patients with locally advanced liver cancer unsuitable for other loco-regional treatments were treated with SBRT with 50-60 Gy in 3-12 fractions in two consecutive prospective trials.

Results

A total of 83 patients were included, of whom 14 were excluded, leaving 69 evaluable patients with 74 treated lesions. A total of 50 patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 11 patients had cholangiocarcinoma (CCC). Approximately 76% had a Child-Pugh (CP) score of A, while 54% had an albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score of 1. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 11 months, and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months. The ALBI score was an important predictor of overall survival (HR 2.094, p = 0.001), which remained significant also in the multivariate analysis. Patients with an ALBI grade of ≥1 had an OS of 4 months versus 23 months in patients with an ALBI grade of 1 (p ≤ 0.001). The local control at 1 and 2 years was 91%. Thirteen patients developed grade ≥ 3 toxicities, of whom nine patients experienced liver toxicities. Patients with a higher ALBI score had a high risk for developing hepatic failure (OR 6.136, p = 0.006).

Discussion

SBRT is a very effective treatment with low toxicity and should be considered as a local treatment option in patients with HCC and CCC. Patients with a higher ALBI grade are at risk for developing toxicities after SBRT and have a significantly lower survival rate.

Research progress on machine algorithm prediction of liver cancer prognosis after intervention therapy

The treatment for liver cancer has transitioned from traditional surgical resection to interventional therapies, which have become increasingly popular among patients due to their minimally invasive nature and significant local efficacy. However, with advancements in treatment technologies, accurately assessing patient response and predicting long-term survival has become a crucial research topic. Over the past decade, machine algorithms have made remarkable progress in the medical field, particularly in hepatology and prognosis studies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Machine algorithms, including deep learning and machine learning, can identify prognostic patterns and trends by analyzing vast amounts of clinical data. Despite significant advancements, several issues remain unresolved in the prognosis prediction of liver cancer using machine algorithms. Key challenges and main controversies include effectively integrating multi-source clinical data to improve prediction accuracy, addressing data privacy and ethical concerns, and enhancing the transparency and interpretability of machine algorithm decision-making processes. This paper aims to systematically review and analyze the current applications and potential of machine algorithms in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing interventional therapy for liver cancer, providing theoretical and empirical support for future research and clinical practice.

Complex Multi-site Stereotactic Body Re-irradiation With CT-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy

Online adaptive radiotherapy optimizes a patient's treatment plan to their daily anatomy to account for inter-fraction motion. Daily target and organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation allows for optimized treatments and has been shown to have favorable outcomes in the abdominal region. Adaptive radiotherapy also has the potential to support fine control of dose in re-irradiation to OARs. Herein, we describe a complex multi-site re-irradiation case utilizing CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy. A 46-year-old man with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma presented for re-irradiation of four metastatic lesions to the right acetabulum, T11, S2, and a gastrosplenic lymph node (gsLN). The right acetabulum, T11, and S2 lesions previously received 20 Gy in five fractions. For the current course, he was prescribed 35 Gy (T11, right acetabulum, and gsLN) and 30 Gy (S2) in five fractions. An equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was employed to assess cumulative doses for critical OARs and guide planning. The re-irradiated lesions were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and the gsLN was treated with adaptive radiotherapy. An isotoxic approach was utilized to create the scheduled and adapted plans for the gsLN. Adapted plans were created on the patient's daily anatomy as visualized on kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography and compared against the scheduled plan. Dose-volume histogram objectives were used to compare the plans, and the superior plan was chosen for delivery. The adapted plan was used for all five fractions and met all critical OAR constraints while maintaining target coverage. The use of the scheduled plan would have resulted in stomach and/or esophagus constraint violations on all five fractions. This resulted in reduced EQD2 doses of 6.4 and 12.3 Gy for the esophagus and stomach, respectively. We report the successful treatment of a patient undergoing tri-site SBRT re-irradiation with concurrent CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy to a gsLN. The adaptive treatment allowed us to meet critical OAR constraints while maintaining target coverage. Few studies have described the use of CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy in re-irradiation cases, and the potential benefit for these complex cases is evident.

Recent update of proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

Although access to proton beam therapy (PBT) is limited worldwide, its use for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is gradually increasing with the expansion of new facilities. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis to investigate the updated evidence of PBT for HCC.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies that enrolled patients with liver-confined HCC that were treated with PBT for a cure up to February 2024.

RESULTS

A total of 1,858 HCC patients receiving PBT from 22 studies between 2004 and 2023 were selected for this meta-analysis. The median proportion of Child-Pugh class A was 86% (range, 41-100), and the median tumor size was 3.6 cm (range, 1.2-9.0). The median total dose ranged from 55 GyE to 76 GyE (median, 69). The pooled rates of 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival after PBT were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85-91) and 86% (95% CI, 82-90), respectively. The pooled 3- and 5-year overall rates were 60% (95% CI, 54-66) and 46% (95% CI, 38-54), respectively. The pooled rates of grade 3 hepatic toxicity, classic radiationinduced liver disease (RILD), and non-classic RILD were 1%, 2%, and 1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study supports PBT for HCC and demonstrates favorable long-term survival and low hepatic toxicities compared with other published studies on other radiotherapy modalities. However, further studies are needed to identify the subgroups that will benefit from PBT.

Expanding Indications for Liver Transplantation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Improvements in downstaging therapies have expanded the indications for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with more advanced disease are now considered candidates due to advancements in radiation therapy, combination therapies, and immunotherapy. Combination stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown to be superior to the historic treatment, sorafenib, in patients with macrovascular invasion. These patients are now candidates for LT with stable disease after LRT. Patients with ruptured HCC and prolonged stability have also been shown to have acceptable outcomes. The role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy needs to be further defined and has the potential to further improve tumor control prior to transplant.

Managing hepatocellular carcinoma across the stages: efficacy and outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy : A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a unique challenge due to its predilection for developing on compromised livers, often limiting surgical options. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising local treatment modality for HCC. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of SBRT in HCC patients not suitable for surgery, focusing on local control, optimal radiation dosing, and prognostic factors.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 52 HCC patients treated with SBRT were examined. The study assessed local control, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) while conducting dosimetric analyses. The relationship between mean liver dose and Child-Pugh score (CPS) progression was also explored.

RESULTS

SBRT demonstrated 93.4% freedom from local progression (FFLP) at 12 months. Notably, a near minimum dose (D98%) below 61 Gy as an equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions with α/β 10 Gy (EQD2α/β10) was associated with reduced FFLP (p-value 0.034). Logistic regression analysis revealed a dose-response relationship for FFLP and D98% with 95% and 98% probability of FFLP at a dose of 56.9 and 73.1 Gy, respectively. The study observed OS rates of 63.7% at 1 year and 34.3% at 3 years. Patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) and larger tumors (≥ 37 cm3) experienced decreased PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis identified PVTT, larger tumor volume, and performance status as independent predictors of reduced OS. Notably, classical radiation-induced disease (cRILD) was absent, but nonclassical (nc) RILD occurred in 7.7% of patients. Regression analysis linked a mean EQD2α/β3-8 dose to the liver (12.8-12.6) with a 10% likelihood of ncRILD.

CONCLUSION

SBRT offers a compelling option for achieving high local control and promising survival outcomes in HCC. The study supports a radiation dose range of 61-73.1 Gy, coupled with a mean liver dose under 12.6-12.8 Gy as EQD2, to achieve favorable FFLP rates, with acceptable toxicity rates.

A randomised controlled trial of Standard Of Care versus RadioAblaTion in Early Stage HepatoCellular Carcinoma (SOCRATES HCC)

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic options for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in individual patients can be limited by tumor and location, liver dysfunction and comorbidities. Many patients with early-stage HCC do not receive curative-intent therapies. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as an effective, non-invasive HCC treatment option, however, randomized evidence for SABR in the first line setting is lacking.

METHODS

Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 21.07 SOCRATES-HCC is a phase II, prospective, randomised trial comparing SABR to other current standard of care therapies for patients with a solitary HCC ≤ 8 cm, ineligible for surgical resection or transplantation. The study is divided into 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 will compromise 118 patients with tumors ≤ 3 cm eligible for thermal ablation randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to thermal ablation or SABR. Cohort 2 will comprise 100 patients with tumors > 3 cm up to 8 cm in size, or tumors ≤ 3 cm ineligible for thermal ablation, randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to SABR or best other standard of care therapy including transarterial therapies. The primary objective is to determine whether SABR results in superior freedom from local progression (FFLP) at 2 years compared to thermal ablation in cohort 1 and compared to best standard of care therapy in cohort 2. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, adverse events, patient reported outcomes and health economic analyses.

DISCUSSION

The SOCRATES-HCC study will provide the first randomized, multicentre evaluation of the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of SABR versus other standard of care therapies in the first line treatment of unresectable, early-stage HCC. It is a broad, multicentre collaboration between hepatology, interventional radiology and radiation oncology groups around Australia, coordinated by TROG Cancer Research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

anzctr.org.au, ACTRN12621001444875, registered 21 October 2021.

Carbon ion radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma provides excellent local control: The prospective phase I PROMETHEUS trial

Background & Aims

Inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy. However, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is more effective for sparing non-tumorous liver. High linear energy transfer could promote therapy efficacy. Japanese and Chinese studies on hypofractionated CIRT have yielded excellent results. Because of different radiobiological models and the different etiological spectrum of HCC, applicability of these results to European cohorts and centers remains questionable. The aim of this prospective study was to assess safety and efficacy and to determine the optimal dose of CIRT with active raster scanning based on the local effect model (LEM) I.

Methods

CIRT was performed every other day in four fractions with relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted fraction doses of 8.1-10.5 Gy (total doses 32.4-42.0 Gy [RBE]). Dose escalation was performed in five dose levels with at least three patients each. The primary endpoint was acute toxicity after 4 weeks.

Results

Twenty patients received CIRT (median age 74.7 years, n = 16 with liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh scores [CP] A5 [n = 10], A6 [n = 4], B8 [n = 1], and B9 [n = 1]). Median follow up was 23 months. No dose-limiting toxicities and no toxicities exceeding grade II occurred, except one grade III gamma-glutamyltransferase elevation 12 months after CIRT, synchronous to out-of-field hepatic progression. During 12 months after CIRT, no CP elevation occurred. The highest dose level could be applied safely. No local recurrence developed during follow up. The objective response rate was 80%. Median overall survival was 30.8 months (1/2/3 years: 75%/64%/22%). Median progression-free survival was 20.9 months (1/2/3 years: 59%/43%/43%). Intrahepatic progression outside of the CIRT target volume was the most frequent pattern of progression.

Conclusions

CIRT of HCC yields excellent local control without dose-limiting toxicity.

Impact and implications

To date, safety and efficacy of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma have only been evaluated prospectively in Japanese and Chinese studies. The optimal dose and fractionation when using the local effect model for radiotherapy planning are unknown. The results are of particular interest for European and American particle therapy centers, but also of relevance for all specialists involved in the treatment and care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, as we present the first prospective data on carbon ion radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma outside of Asia. The excellent local control should encourage further use of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and design of randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trials Registration

The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01167374).

Do We Have a Winner? Advocating for SBRT in HCC Management

•Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective locoregional therapy for inoperable patients with HCC.•SBRT compares favorably with other local therapies in terms of local control, survival, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness.•SBRT should be considered and discussed in multidisciplinary management of appropriate HCC patients.•Advances in SBRT and novel combinations with systemic therapy may further widen the therapeutic index in HCC.

SBRT for Liver Tumors: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know

This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases, and cholangiocarcinoma. Emerging prospective evidence has demonstrated the benefit and low rates of toxicity across a broad range of clinical contexts. We provide an introduction for the interventional radiologist, with a discussion of underlying themes such as tumor dose-response, mitigation of liver toxicity, and the technical considerations relevant to performing liver SBRT. Ultimately, we recommend that SBRT should be routinely included in the armamentarium of locoregional therapies for liver malignancies, alongside those liver-directed therapies offered by interventional radiology.

Definitive Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Australian Multi-Institutional Review of Outcomes

AIMS

Standard curative options for early-stage, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are often unsuitable due to liver dysfunction, comorbidities and/or tumour location. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has shown high rates of local control in HCC; however, limited data exist in the treatment-naïve, curative-intent setting. We report the outcomes of patients with solitary early-stage HCC treated with SBRT as first-line curative-intent therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective study of treatment-naïve patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A, solitary ≤5 cm HCC, Child-Pugh score (CPS) A liver function who underwent SBRT between 2010 and 2019 as definitive therapy. The primary end point was freedom from local progression. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, rate of treatment-related clinical toxicities and change in CPS >1.

RESULTS

In total, 68 patients were evaluated, with a median follow-up of 20 months (range 3-58). The median age was 68 years (range 50-86); 54 (79%) were men, 62 (91%) had cirrhosis and 50 (74%) were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0. The median HCC diameter was 2.5 cm (range 1.3-5) and the median prescription biologically effective dose with a tumour a/b ratio of 10 Gy (BED10) was 93 Gy (interquartile range 72-100 Gy). Two-year freedom from local progression, progression-free survival and overall survival were 94.3% (95% confidence interval 86.6-100%), 59.5% (95% confidence interval 46.3-76.4%) and 88% (95% confidence interval 79.2-97.6%), respectively. Nine patients (13.2%) experienced grade ≥2 treatment-related clinical toxicities. A rise >1 in CPS was observed in six cirrhotic patients (9.6%).

CONCLUSION

SBRT is an effective and well-tolerated option to consider in patients with solitary, early-stage HCC. Prospective, randomised comparative studies are warranted to further refine its role as a first-line curative-intent therapy.