Rituximab exhibits a better safety profile when used as a first line of treatment for pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective study

Comparative analysis of demographics and clinical outcomes in patients with pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus with high versus normal anti-desmoglein levels post-complete remission

Some patients with pemphigus continue to have elevated levels of desmoglein autoantibodies (Dsg Ab) even after achieving remission. Thus, it is crucial to gain a deeper understanding of these patients' demographics and clinical patterns to improve prognosis, prevent complications, and devise individualized management strategies. This study utilized electronic patient records from a dermatology registry, focusing on PV and PF patients (diagnosed based on clinical and histopathologic diagnosis which included DIF) who achieved complete remission. We analyzed demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, BMI, disease type, lesion onset location, disease duration, test results, anti-desmoglein levels, and previous treatments. For comparative analysis, patients were categorized into two groups based on their Dsg Ab levels (high vs. normal) 3 months post-remission. Of the 80 patients evaluated, 57.5% were female, averaging 48.66 years. Significant gender differences were observed in Dsg Ab1 antibody levels, with males more likely to test sustained positive (P = 0.037), though no such difference was found for Dsg Ab 3 (P = 0.167). No significant differences in age, BMI, or history of other diseases were found between patients with high versus normal Dsg Abs post-recovery. The average time to complete recovery was 27.34 months, with no significant difference in recovery time or relapse rates based on antibody levels. However, there was a notable difference in some variables, including PDAI score, mucosal involvement, the average dose of prednisolone after achieving complete remission and occurrence of infectious complications (only regarding Dsg Ab 3) between the two groups (P < 0.05). The study underscores the heterogeneity in the post-remission course of pemphigus patients regarding the persistence of high Dsg Ab levels in some individuals. These findings emphasize the need for a tailored approach to management and monitoring of patients. Further research into the mechanisms driving these differences could pave the way for more effective treatments and prognostic tools in pemphigus care.

Effect of opioid receptor antagonist on mitigating tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK)-induced apoptolysis in pemphigus pathogenesis

Pemphigus is a severe autoimmune blistering disease characterized by acantholysis triggered by autoantibodies against desmoglein 1 and 3 (DSG1/3). Apoptosis plays a pivotal role in facilitating acantholysis, yet the precise underlying mechanism remains obscure. Tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) is known to promote apoptosis and disrupt cell junctions, although its involvement in pemphigus pathogenesis remains ambiguous. Our study observed decreased DSG1/3 expression alongside increased TWEAK/fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) expression and keratinocyte apoptosis in both lesional and perilesional skin. In vitro experiments revealed that TWEAK-stimulated keratinocytes exhibited enhanced apoptosis, STAT1 phosphorylation, and reduced intercellular DSG1/3 expression. Notably, bulk-RNA sequencing unveiled that CASPASE-3 was responsible for mediating the DSG1/3 depletion, as confirmed by direct interaction with DSG1/3 in a co-immunoprecipitation assay. Naloxone, known for preserving cellular adhesion and preventing cell death, effectively reduced apoptosis and restored DSG1/3 levels in TWEAK-stimulated keratinocytes. The anti-apoptotic properties of naloxone were further validated in a murine pemphigus model. Our findings elucidate that TWEAK facilitates keratinocyte apoptosis by augmenting caspase-3 activity, leading to DSG1/3 depletion and apoptosis in pemphigus. Importantly, naloxone can counter TWEAK-induced apoptosis in pemphigus pathogenesis, offering a potential therapeutic intervention.

A Comparative Study of Demographic and Clinical Criteria Between Male and Female Patients With Pemphigus Referred to a Referral Hospital in Iran

Background: Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by the formation of blisters on the skin and mucous membranes, caused by autoantibodies against desmoglein, a key protein in cell adhesion. This study aims to compare demographic and clinical criteria between male and female patients with pemphigus referred to a referral hospital, utilizing data from the pemphigus diseases registry. Method: This retrospective cross-sectional analysis focused on several key aspects age at disease onset, severity (measured by the Pemphigus Disease Area Index [PDAI]), types of pemphigus, duration of disease, and diagnostic criteria including the presence of antidesmoglein antibodies and findings from direct immunofluorescence (DIF). By examining these variables among a cohort selected based on their diagnosis of pemphigus, the study aimed to identify significant gender differences in disease manifestation, diagnosis, and progression. This approach is crucial for tailoring more effective gender-specific management and treatment strategies for this rare autoimmune condition. Results: In a comprehensive analysis of 1218 pemphigus patients in the year 2021 from the hospital's registry, comprising 543 males (44.6%) and 675 females (55.4%), significant gender differences were identified in 9 out of 44 variables examined. The study revealed that males had a higher age at disease onset, more frequent clinical manifestations in the head, neck, and trunk areas, and greater severity of disease as measured by the PDAI score compared to females. Conversely, females exhibited higher instances of mucosal manifestations and a higher PDAI score for mucosal erosion blister of the lower gingiva. No significant gender differences were found in 21 variables, including the overall age of patients, specific clinical manifestations across various mucous membranes, types of pemphigus, and PDAI scores for mucosal erosions in particular locations, indicating a nuanced gender impact on the presentation and severity of pemphigus that necessitates tailored clinical approaches. Conclusion: The study highlights significant gender differences in the presentation and severity of pemphigus, underscoring the importance of gender-specific approaches in the diagnosis and management of this condition. The findings contribute valuable insights into the complex nature of pemphigus and underline the necessity for further research to understand the underlying mechanisms driving these differences.

Steroid as a Saviour and Culprit in Pemphigus Vulgaris Therapy: A Rare Case Series

Introduction:

Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune dermatological life-threatening diseases of which Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) is the most common (1-5 cases/million/year) with a mortality rate of 60-90%. PV is generally characterized by painful oral erosions, along with or without cutaneous lesions, as blisters are often misdiagnosed. The management strategy of PV includes steroids along with adjuvant therapy.

Case Presentation:

We report the case of three female patients with a mean age of 30.67 years who were diagnosed with pemphigus vulgaris and was on steroid therapy for a long duration. The longterm steroid therapy in all these three patients resulted in adverse drug reactions such as Cushing syndrome, oral and vaginal candidiasis. Although the steroid was found to cause ADR among these patients, the treatment with steroids and rituximab was continued. The withdrawal of steroids results in flare-up conditions, whereas the addition of rituximab serves as a steroid sparring partner in the management of PV. However, premedication was administered before the infusion of rituximab to prevent potential toxicity associated with rituximab. Further, administration of pulse therapy over oral dosing of steroids lowers the risks of ADR and long-term complications associated with steroids.

Conclusion:

As PV requires the management with high doses of steroids along with the immunosuppressant, patients are more prone to developing drug-related problems. Hence, the rigorous monitoring of the therapy is vital to prevent adverse effects of long-term therapy. Clinical pharmacists and pharmacologists are the most suitable pillar of the healthcare system for drug therapy management.

A Comprehensive Review on the Efficacy of Anti-CD20 Therapies in Pemphigus Treatment

Pemphigus, an autoimmune blistering disorder, poses significant therapeutic challenges due to dysregulated B cells and the involvement of CD20. This review assesses the efficacy of anti-CD20 therapies, including rituximab, ofatumumab, ocrelizumab, and obinutuzumab, in pemphigus treatment. Mechanisms of action, clinical studies, and safety profiles were analyzed, revealing diverse impacts on disease severity. B cell depletion emerged as a pivotal factor, disrupting the autoimmune process and reducing pathogenic antibodies. Varied efficacy and safety profiles among agents underscore the need for personalized treatment strategies guided by biomarkers. Challenges such as resistance and long-term safety concerns necessitate continued research and vigilance. In clinical practice, insights from this review inform nuanced, tailored approaches for improved pemphigus management. The dynamic landscape of emerging therapies and personalized medicine emphasizes the need for ongoing research and strategic clinical decision-making. This review is a foundation for future investigations, providing insights for clinicians and researchers in optimizing pemphigus treatment.

Combination therapy for management of pemphigus patients with unexpected therapeutic response to rituximab: A report of five cases

Key Clinical Message

The immunosuppressant agents should be considered earlier in the course of treatment with rituximab, possibly after the unfavorable response at first cycle of treatment, especially in male patients and those with high BMI.

Abstract

Rituximab (RTX) has recently been proposed as an alternative first-line therapy for pemphigus patients. However, there are some rare reports of worsening of pemphigus following RTX therapy in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using a combination treatment of mycophenolate mofetil or dapsone and methotrexate in case of nonresponse, exacerbation or development of allergic reactions following rituximab therapy in pemphigus patients. In this case series, archive files of pemphigus patient in a tertiary care hospital from 2016 to 2021 who were treated with rituximab were reviewed and those with failure in treatment process including nonresponsiveness, exacerbation or development of allergic reactions to rituximab were identified and assessed. The study includes five patients out of 1245 RTX-treated patients, who did not respond to RTX (one patient) or experienced an exacerbation of disease (two patients) or development of allergic reactions (two patients). Male patients with high BMI (BMI > 25) whose response to rituximab was not good at first cycle and happened to receive rituximab later in the course of disease, had highest number of relapses and benefited the most from this combination immunosuppressive treatment as an alternative for repeating rituximab cycles. The lower risk of relapse and a better chance of remission might indicate the efficacy of adjuvant immunosuppressant therapy in patients with no-response, exacerbation, or allergic reaction to rituximab. These therapeutic effects were better observed in patients who received lower doses of rituximab which could suggest that the immunosuppressant agents should be considered earlier in the course of the disease, possibly after the first failed trial of rituximab therapy.

COVID outcome in pemphigus: Does rituximab make pemphigus patients susceptible to more severe COVID-19?

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised some concerns regarding the management of chronic skin diseases, especially in patients on immunosuppressive therapy including patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Literature review reveals conflicting results about the effect of monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab on clinical outcome of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reciprocal interaction of COVID-19 and pemphigus and the effect of rituximab on prognosis of COVID-19 in patients.

METHODS

We set up a retrospective study on adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris and a history of COVID-19 with or without symptoms during 2020.

RESULTS

Thirty-six adults with pemphigus vulgaris and SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed with positive RT-PCR test results in 31 cases (86.1%) and suspected in the 5 others (13.9%). Gender, total dose of rituximab, number of rituximab cycles, and involvement of head and neck were not associated to duration of COVID-19 symptoms (p values: 0.32, 0.23, 0.84, and 0.51, respectively), severity of disease (hospitalization) (p values: 0.46, 0.39, 0.23, and 0.72, respectively), or the percentage of lung involvement on CT scan (p values: 0.07, 0.36, 0.38, and 0.09, respectively). Regarding the impact of COVID-19 on pemphigus, the majority of patients did not experience any changes in their pemphigus regarding clinical phenotype (100%) or severity (83.3%), but PV was worsened in 6 (16.9%) patients which was controlled with increasing the prednisolone dosage.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab appears to be safe with no increased risk of severe form of COVID-19 in patients with pemphigus vulgaris.

Striae gravidarum treatment: evaluating non-ablating fractional laser (NAFL) efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND

Striae gravidarum (SG) is a common pregnancy-related dermatologic problem, for which finding an effective treatment remains a challenge.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1540 nm non-ablative fractional laser (Star lux 500) in the treatment of SG in Iranian women and peruse the relationship between clinical improvement rate and patient characteristics as well as clinical features of striae.

METHOD

A prospective before-after study was conducted on 50 patients with SG who received three monthly sessions of 1540 nm non-ablative fractional laser and were followed for 2 months after the last treatment session. Clinical changes were measured using both provider-rated outcome through before/after pictures represented by final clinical score (from 0 to 5) and patient-reported outcome (patient global assessment or PGA).

RESULTS

Over the course of the study both final clinical score and PGA increased significantly from week 4 to week 20 (P value: <0.001 and 0.048, respectively). Only modest adverse effects including erythema, edema and hyperpigmentation were noted.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, patients with SG of different type (rubra/alba) or maturity may somehow benefit from treatment with NAFL experiencing minimal transient side effects.Therefore, NAFL may be considered a safe and partially effective treatment option for stretch mark of patients with SG.

Kaposi's sarcoma in a patient with pemphigus vulgaris mimicking exacerbation of pemphigus

BACKGROUND

Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a rare multifocal angiogenic tumor often seen in immunocompromised setting such as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or organ transplantation recipients. Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a rare blistering disorder with mucocutaneous involvement for which immunosuppressive therapy has long been the core of treatment. Iatrogenic form of KS has been reported infrequently in pemphigus patients as a result of long-term immunosuppressive therapy.

CASE

We describe a 39-year-old male patient with confirmed diagnosis of PV who developed KS after receiving immunosuppressive agents for his pemphigus. KS was initially localized to the oral cavity with features mimicking exacerbation of his pemphigus.

CONCLUSION

This interesting case of KS suggests that dermatologists visiting patients with pemphigus with discomfort in the oral cavity should have a high degree of awareness and consider other differential diagnoses along with merely an exacerbation of PV.

Two asymptomatic facial erythematous macules in an adult male

Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune bullous disorders with different types. Pemphigus foliaceous (PF) is a difficult-to-diagnosis disorder which shares clinical features with many dermatoses. We hereby, present an interesting case of PF which serves as a reminder for clinicians that pemphigus is not always a serious condition with rapid extension of lesions and it could have a very limited and benign form.

Clinical course and outcomes of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus: A retrospective study using a nationwide database in Japan

Pemphigus is a life-threatening autoimmune blistering disease. Patient characteristics, treatment courses, and outcomes remain unclear owing to its rarity. To describe the background, treatment, and outcomes of pemphigus, we identified 2598 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 1186 patients with pemphigus foliaceus from a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients with pemphigus vulgaris were younger (62 vs 72 years, P < 0.001), had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to be admitted to high-volume hospitals (38% vs 30%, P < 0.001) than those with pemphigus foliaceus. Patients with pemphigus vulgaris had undergone more aggressive treatment, including steroid pulse therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, or plasmapheresis, compared with those with pemphigus foliaceus (48% vs 42%, P = 0.001); specifically, in patients aged <70 years, the pemphigus vulgaris group was more likely to undergo aggressive treatment than the pemphigus foliaceus group (52% vs 45%), whereas there was no significant difference in patients aged ≥70 years (40% vs 40%). Immunosuppressive agents (30% vs 26%, P = 0.015) and analgesics, including opioids (45% vs 36%, P < 0.001), were used more frequently, whereas topical corticosteroids were used less frequently (32% vs 48%, P < 0.001) in patients with pemphigus vulgaris compared with those with pemphigus foliaceus. In-hospital mortality was lower in patients with pemphigus vulgaris than in those with pemphigus foliaceus (2.2% vs 4.0%, P = 0.002); in the comparison stratified by age, the mortality was equivalent among the two groups (0.6% in patients aged <70 years and 6.1% in those aged ≥70 years). Overall, patients with pemphigus vulgaris had a 10-day longer hospitalization period and higher hospitalization costs than those with pemphigus foliaceus. Our findings provide useful information for understanding the current trends in the management of pemphigus in Japan.

Prevalence and management of chronic hepatitis B in pemphigus and pemphigoid patients: new evidence for the safety of rituximab

BACKGROUND

Although the treatments of pemphigus and pemphigoid patients have tended toward safer options, patients with chronic infections seem to be still at the risk of infection reactivation when they are exposed to any of immunosuppressive treatments.

AIM

To evaluate the prevalence of chronic HBV as well as its risk factors and management approach in patients with pemphigus and pemphigoid.

METHODS

A retrospective study on 1646 registered pemphigus and pemphigoid patients was conducted between Jan 2017 to Feb 2019. The prevalence of HBV, the association between the treatments, mainly prednisolone and rituximab with HBV reactivation as well as outcomes of patients after management with antiviral therapies were evaluated.

RESULTS

From 1646 reviewed patients, 10 (0.60%) patients with chronic HBV were identified. We found a negative correlation between the ALT (P-value<0.001), AST (P-value=0.090), and Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) (P-value=0.034) and age of patients. At the time points that prednisolone dosage was higher, higher levels of ALT, but no difference in AST levels was noted. The portion of patients with normal ALT was significantly higher (P-value=0.036; OR=2.22) in those who had received rituximab within the previous six months (38 of 49; 77.6%) as compared to those who did not (81 of 133; 60.9%).

CONCLUSION

Avoidance (high dose) systemic corticosteroids in patients with chronic HBV, and using rituximab instead in severe cases benefits this group of patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Rituximab vs Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Treatment of Pemphigus Vulgaris

Importance

There is an increasing body of literature that supports the use of rituximab as a first-line steroid-sparing agent in pemphigus vulgaris. However, the cost of rituximab is substantial compared with conventional agents, and there are limited health economic data to justify its use.

Objective

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of rituximab biosimilars relative to mycophenolate mofetil as a first-line steroid-sparing agent for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A cost-utility analysis over a 24-month time horizon was conducted from the perspective of the Australian health care sector using a modeled cohort of treatment-naive adult patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. A Markov cohort model was constructed to simulate disease progression following first-line treatment with rituximab biosimilars or mycophenolate mofetil. The simulated cohort transitioned between controlled disease, uncontrolled disease, and death. Efficacy and utility data were obtained from available published literature. Cost data were primarily obtained from published government data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. Primary outcomes were the changes in cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over the 24 months.

Interventions

Rituximab biosimilars and mycophenolate mofetil.

Results

The simulated cohort of treatment-naive patients had a mean age of 50.8 years, a female-to-male ratio of 1.24, and moderate to severe disease as classified by the Harman criteria. First-line rituximab biosimilars were associated with a cost reduction of AU$639 and an improvement of 0.07 QALYs compared with mycophenolate mofetil, resulting in an ICER of -AU$8818/QALY. Rituximab biosimilars were therefore more effective and less costly compared with mycophenolate mofetil. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that rituximab biosimilars remained cost-effective across a range of values for cost, utility, and transition probability input parameters and willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cost-utility analysis, rituximab biosimilars were cost-effective compared with mycophenolate mofetil for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Further investigation into its cost-effectiveness over a longer time horizon is necessary, but the favorable results of this study suggest that the high acquisition costs of rituximab biosimilars may be offset by its effectiveness and provide economic evidence in support of its listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for pemphigus vulgaris.

New-onset pemphigus foliaceus following SARS-CoV-2 infection and unmasking multiple sclerosis: A case report

Development of pemphigus foliaceus (PF) following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection has only been reported in one patient who had received Bamlanivimab and thus might be considered as a drug‐induced case of PF. Here, we reported the first case of PF arising solely after COVID infection without taking any culprit drug.

COVID‐19 has led to many dermatologic conditions. Here, we reported the first case of pemphigus foliaceus arising solely after SARS‐Cov‐2 infection without taking any culprit drug.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and practical points in psoriasis patients: a narrative review

SARS‐CoV2 vaccines were approved without long‐term monitoring due to emergent situations. This has raised some issues about timing and protocol of receiving vaccines in specific situations including patients with chronic inflammatory disorders such as psoriasis. Here, we present different aspects of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and vaccination in psoriasis patients and aim to provide solutions to overcome the potential challenges. In brief, the benefits of vaccination outweigh the potential risk; vaccine‐triggered de novo or flares of psoriasis is uncommon. As such, all psoriasis patients, especially those receiving systemic treatments including anti tumor necrosis factor agents, are strongly recommended to get SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines. It is recommended that new immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapies be initiated at least 1 week after the second SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine dose, if possible. In addition, in severe and active forms of psoriasis, it is better to delay vaccination until stabilization of the disease.

Metabolic derangement in patients with vitiligo: a cross-sectional study

Vitiligo is a pigmentary disorder resulting from progressive destruction of melanocytes in the skin. There is a growing body of evidence about higher risk of metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemia in some dermatoses including vitiligo. We aimed to evaluate lipid profile, leptin and C reactive protein (CRP) status among Iranian patients with vitiligo, compared with healthy controls and perused the relationship between abnormal values of these parameters with disease duration and physical characteristics of patients. 40 patients with vitiligo and 40 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Data on weight, height, lipid profile, leptin and CRP values were recorded and compared. The mean values for nearly all study parameters (except for high-density lipoprotein) were significantly higher in patients with vitiligo, compared with healthy controls, irrespective of age and sex. We could not find any correlation between vitiligo and study parameters, regarding disease severity and extension of lesions; but in patients who have been suffering from vitiligo for more than 5 years, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and CRP values were noted to be significantly higher (p<0.001, p=0.003 and p=0.03, respectively). In conclusion, screening of patients with vitiligo in regard to their lipid profile as well as blood pressure should be considered, especially in patients with longer disease duration or those who have other cardiovascular risk factors to prevent morbidity and mortality as a result of developing cardiovascular events.

Role of Rituximab in the Treatment of Pemphigus Vulgaris: Patient Selection and Acceptability

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is an approved adjuvant treatment, in combination with oral corticosteroids, for patients with pemphigus vulgaris, a severe and potentially life-threatening autoimmune blistering skin disorder. Updated approaches to the management of pemphigus vulgaris support rituximab as a first-line adjuvant treatment to induce remission early in the course of disease; however, its feasibility in the clinical setting is often reduced by a series of limitations, including high cost of this biological drug, physician and patient concern for the risk of adverse reactions, and uncertainty regarding the optimum dosing and schedule of administration. The standard approved rituximab dosages, which are derived from lymphoma protocols, have been recognized to exceed the effective dose required for inducing B cell depletion, since the B cell burden in pemphigus vulgaris is much lower than in lymphoproliferative disorders. To overcome these limitations, recent research has investigated alternative regimens of rituximab, using lower doses of the drug. Moreover, differences in patient and disease characteristics that are highlighted in the literature strongly suggest that therapy should be tailored individually on a case-by-case basis: personalized treatment schedules may be necessary to optimize response to treatment and tolerability in different subjects, with the possibility of repeated infusions for severe forms and in case of relapse. Finally, low-dose regimens of rituximab were suggested to be favorable during the COVID-19 pandemic by providing a lesser degree of immune cell depletion while retaining a sufficient response. In conclusion, the current literature suggests that lower-dose regimens of rituximab are not only tolerable and cost-effective but may also be associated with a positive response in pemphigus vulgaris, comparable to that achieved with higher doses especially in early disease. Further evidence from rigorous clinical trials will be required to optimize lower-dose regimens of RTX and establish their position within the treatment scenario of pemphigus vulgaris.

High Incidence of Metabolic Syndrome Components in Lichen Planus Patients: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis, involving the skin, appendages, and mucous membranes. There is a growing body of evidence about higher risk of metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemia in some dermatoses including LP.

AIM

To evaluate lipid profile, leptin, and CRP status among Iranian LP patients, compared to healthy controls, and peruse the relationship between abnormal values of these parameters with the disease duration and physical characteristics of patients.

METHODS

40 LP patients and 40 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Data on weight, height, lipid profile, leptin, and CRP values were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

The mean values for leptin, CRP, and lipid profile parameters (except for HDL) were higher in patients, compared to controls. Total cholesterol level was negatively associated with disease duration in patients (P value: 0.039, r: -0.33). Serum leptin level was positively correlated with BMI both in patients and controls (P value: 0.037 and 0.003, respectively). In the patient group, LDL level, although insignificant, was higher in men, but HDL and leptin levels were significantly higher in women in comparison with men (P value: 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Screening of LP patients in regard to their lipid profile might be more reasonable in men or those who have other cardiovascular risk factors to prevent morbidity and mortality in result of developing cardiovascular events.

A review of reported infectious events following rituximab therapy in pemphigus patients

Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune blistering condition that used to be fatal before the introduction of corticosteroid (CS) and immunosuppressive agents. Rituximab is a monoclonal anti-CD-20 antibody that induces the pathologic B-cells apoptosis with significant efficacy in the treatment of pemphigus. The application of rituximab can lead to infectious events. We aim to review the reported infectious events in pemphigus patients who previously received rituximab and classify them based on the causative agents. A thorough search of PubMed was conducted using the keywords "rituximab," "pemphigus," "infection," "viral disease," "viral infection," "complication," "efficacy" and their combinations also applying their equivalent Mesh terms and including the references cited in each study. All studies that mentioned at least one infectious event were included. A total of 77 infectious events in 68 patients were reported in the literature out of which the most reported causative agent was viral but the most fatal one found to be bacterial. Although rituximab therapy has shown promising results in controlling pemphigus patients mainly the refractory cases, given possible fatal outcomes, we believe the medical profile of the patients before initiating the therapy warrants careful examination to search for any risk factors or predisposing conditions.

Evaluating the risk-to-benefit ratio of using cotrimoxazole as a pneumocystis pneumonia preventative intervention among pemphigus patients treated with rituximab: A retrospective study with 494 patients

Rituximab is widely used as the first-line treatment for pemphigus patients. Since it depletes the B cells, it increases the risk of infections. Here, we evaluated the prophylactic efficacy of cotrimoxazole in decreasing the risk of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) infection in the pemphigus patients treated with rituximab. The medical records of confirmed pemphigus patients receiving rituximab were evaluated in two groups; those who received cotrimoxazole as a prophylactic after rituximab and patients who only received rituximab without any prophylaxis. The occurrence of PCP infection was determined in each group and compared. Medical records of 494 patients, including 301 women and 193 men, with the mean age of 46.74 years were analyzed. The phenotypes of the disease were mucocutaneous (n = 364), mucosal (n = 88), and cutaneous (n = 42). Among them, 235 cases had received cotrimoxazole as a prophylaxis and 259 patients did not. The incidence of PCP in total patients was 2 (0.4%), one in each group. Accordingly, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of PCP between two groups (p = 0.84). Also, no cotrimoxazole-related side effect was observed in the treated group. It seems that due to the low incidence of PCP in pemphigus patients treated with rituximab, prophylactic cotrimoxazole therapy is not necessary and it only increases the overall therapy cost and might cause cotrimoxazole-related adverse effects in some patients. However, regarding its probable beneficial effect in patients with long-term history of immunosuppressive therapy, more studies are required.

Multiple cycles of rituximab therapy for pemphigus: A group of patients with difficult- to-treat disease or a consequence of late rituximab initiation?

Pemphigus is a serious autoimmune disease with few appropriate therapeutic options. Although rituximab (RTX) has recently shown great promise in this regard, the best protocol of its administration is remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the patients who need at least 3 cycles of treatment with RTX to identify hard-to-treat patients' characteristics, which might lead to consider more prompt protocols for treatment of them. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 45 patients with pemphigus vulgaris who received at least 3 cycles of RTX. Their demographic, clinical, and laboratory data as well as details of treatment protocol and final clinical situation of patients were evaluated. Totally, 45 patients (21 men and 24 women) with mean age of 44.33 years were included in this paper. Women were about 8 years older than men (mean age: 48.1 years versus 40.1 years, p: 0.011) and needed RTX approximately 2 years later in their course of disease (gap: 41.04 months vs. 14.85 months, p: 0.003). Buccal, truncal, and scalp regions were the most frequent sites of involvement respectively. A significant decrease in both anti-Dsg1, 3 was seen at last visit compared to baseline. However, the amount of this decrement was not significantly different between them (p: 0.083). Partial remission in 31.11%, complete remission in 24.44%, relapse in 15.56%, partial remission on treatment in 15.56% and complete remission on treatment in 13.33% were seen at the last follow-up session. RTX is an effective medication for PV even in patients with refractory disease and its therapeutic effect is increased with each subsequent cycle. Male gender, severe oral mucosal involvement on disease onset and extensive scalp and truncal lesions as first cutaneous manifestation of disease are more likely to be signs of refractory PV. Hence, it is reasonable to consider more prompt protocols for treatment of these cases. Moreover, late prescription of RTX during the course of disease might play a role in presence of more resistant form of disease.

COVID vaccination in patients under treatment with rituximab: A presentation of two cases from Iran and a review of the current knowledge with a specific focus on pemphigus

SARS‐COV2 vaccines were approved without long‐term monitoring due to emergent situations. This has raised some issues about the timing and protocol of receiving vaccines in specific situations such as patients receiving immunomodulatory agents including rituximab, which is widely used for various disorders such as multiple sclerosis, pemphigus, and many rheumatologic disorders. We described two cases of pemphigus vulgaris (a new case and one with flare‐up) following vaccination with Astrazeneca in Iran and reviewed the existing data in this regard through searching on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. All of the relevant papers published until June 28, 2021, which we could access their full‐texts were included. We found some recommendations made by rheumatologists, neurologists, and dermatologists in regard to vaccination timing in this group of patients and tried to summarize them to provide a practical guide for clinicians. Clinicians should perform a careful, individualized risk–benefit assessment for their patients and consider a delay in rituximab administration after completion of COVID vaccination if there is not any considerable risk of disease relapse or organ failure. Moreover, choosing vaccines with potential of providing protection after single dose, especially in countries with limited access to vaccines may be a reasonable approach.

A prospective comparative study of two regimens of diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) in the treatment of alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic disorder and the best treatment regimen for it is unknown. Currently, one of the best documented treatment modalities for AA is topical immunotherapy.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel method (multi-concentration patch test) versus standard protocol for topical immunotherapy.

METHODS

A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted on 30 patients with Alopecia areata, half of them received DPCP with a novel method using multi-concentration patch test to determine the optimal initiating concentration of DPCP (case group) and the other half experienced immunotherapy according to the standard protocol (control group). Percentage of hair regrowth after 6 months of treatment and the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were evaluated and compared between the two groups. (IRCT registration code: IRCT20141209020250N5).

RESULTS

Absolute and relative hair regrowth percentages were reported 25% and 41.49% in case group and 8.2% and 14.21% in control group respectively. Considerable response (more than 75% hair regrowth) was observed in 4 (26.6%) patients in case and 1 (6.6%) patient in control group. The clinical response was initiated about 7 weeks sooner in case compared to the control group (14 versus 7.38 weeks, P: 0.001). Overall, clinical response was higher in patients received new protocol, compared to control group. Moreover, patients who experienced new protocol had a higher level of treatment satisfaction in comparison with patients having standard protocol (P: 0.012).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the effectiveness and safety of the novel multi-concentration patch test DPCP therapy for AA and its priority to conventional method, at least in terms of shortened duration of DPCP immunotherapy.

A systematic review on efficacy, safety, and treatment-durability of low-dose rituximab for the treatment of Pemphigus: special focus on COVID-19 pandemic concerns

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a FDA-approved monoclonal antibody for adults with moderate to severe potentially life-threatening pemphigus vulgaris. Recent studies have focused on assessments of efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab (<2 gram in each cycle).

METHOD

Databases were searched from 2010 to 2020 (last update: 1 June 2020).

RESULT

Nine studies were entered; including180 cases (92: women, 88: men, age range: 9-83 years). The dosages of each Rituximab cycle varied between ultra-low-dose (≤500 mg for a cycle, either multiple infusions or a single infusion), low-dose (2 × 375 mg/m² or 2 × 500 mg) and modified-dose (3 × 375 mg/m² or 3 × 500 mg). The efficacy and safety of Rituximab in the studies are known by the recovery time, relapse time, and side events. According to the studies, 2 × 500 can lead to complete remission in a broad range, from 35 to 82%. These differences might be explained by different end-points and variable cumulative corticosteroid dosage after RTX administration. Although the studies showed that low dose RTX is efficient, there are some controversies regarding the choosing low-dose for severe patients.

CONCLUSION

Considering the effectiveness of low-dose, intermediate dose, and ultra-low-dose protocols of Rituximab in inducing remission in pemphigus disease and considering factors such as cost of therapy, and the need to induce a minimum of immunosuppression for a minimum duration in the COVID-19 pandemic, suggested to use low-dose Rituximab protocol (2 infusions of 500 mg Rituximab: interval of 2 weeks) to induce the remission in mild-to-moderate pemphigus patients.

A randomized trial of diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) combined with anthralin versus DPCP alone for treating moderate to severe alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder. Finding the best treatment regimen for it remains a challenge. Currently, one of the best documented treatment modalities for AA is topical immunotherapy.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined DPCP and anthralin versus standard protocol (DPCP alone).

METHODS

A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients with Alopecia areata who received DPCP alone (group D) or in combination with anthralin (group D/A). Percentage of hair regrowth after 6 months of treatment and the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Complete hair regrowth was observed among three patients in each group (18.75% in Group D and 15.79% in Group D/A) after 6 months. Moreover, 25% and 31% of patients in group D and 21% and 47% of patients in group D/A had > 75% and > 50% hair regrowth respectively at the end of the study (P-value: 0.696). In addition, earlier age of onset, chronicity of lesions, nail involvement, facial hair loss and extensive lesions at baseline were associated with poor clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

DPCP and anthralin was as effective as DPCP alone and anthralin did not add to the effect of DPCP in treating AA.